• 沒有找到結果。

In this study, we investigate a theory that the perturbed thermodynamic profile caused

by MCV will promote the spin-up of incipient vortex through the generation of

bottom-heavy mass flux profile. We initialize VVM with a very weak, 3 m s-1 Rankine vortex that

represents an idealized MCV embedded into a quiescent environment. Six sensitivity

experiments are carried out with the maximum wind speed situating at different heights

that creates different perturbed potential temperature profile. We find that the MCV with

maximum wind speed placed at 4500 m is the fastest to undergo cyclogenesis, the surface

vortex case and the vortex with height of maximum wind speed at 7500 m barely develops

after 144 hours of integration. We can divide the sensitivity experiments to developing

sets and non-developing sets accordingly.

The direct response to different structure of MCV is the degree of thermodynamic

stabilization. To quantify thermodynamic stabilization, we define stability index as the

difference between the averaged moist entropy at 1000-3000 m and 7000-9000 m. We

find that the stability index is lower (more stable) in DS prior genesis. With more

stabilization, the saturation fraction around the center of the vortex will increase more

efficiently and the convection in such environment, have two distinct features: (1) The

better organization of convection around the vortex center, which can concentrate heating

and moisturizing near the center of incipient vortex. (2) A higher probability of generating vertical mass flux profiles that is more “bottom heavy”, increasing local vorticity through

stretching.

Both of these features have a positive contribution to the intensification of the incipient

vortex, hence faster time to cyclogenesis could be achieved. We are aware that in recent

cloud resolving simulations (Kilroy et al., 2017, 2018), a pre-existing MCV is not

required to spin-up incipient vortex. In this study, we do not argue that the formation of

MCV is a necessary trigger for cyclogenesis. Rather, the favorable thermodynamic

environment collaterally created by the MCV can act as a catalyst to speed up the process,

preventing the weak vortex to dissipate when entering unfavorable environment before it

even had a chance to develop. On the other hand, the stabilization could also be achieved

by other means such as microphysical processes and large scale warming and cooling

with elevated background vorticity and does not exclusively require a MCV, which could

be addressed in future studies.

The key findings of this study are as follow:

⚫ In addition to the mere existence of a MCV, the vertical position of the MCV also

plays a role in the time required for the incipient vortex to develop into a

tropical-depression strength system. When the MCV is placed at different level, it alters

the initial environmental stabilization hence the evolution of stabilization and

column moisture. In our current initial conditions, MCV placed at 4500 m seems

to be the “sweet spot” for the vortex to develop.

⚫ Stabilized environment are more likely to generate bottom heavy mass flux profile

found in two-dimensional cloud model (Raymond & Sessions, 2007) also applies

to three-dimensional environments.

⚫ The aggregation of deep convection in environments with high saturation fraction

that is evident in previous experiments conducted in high resolution models are

also occurs in our experiment. Due to the deep convection characterized in our

experiment is highly rotational, the process is analogous to the upscale growth of

VHT involved in cyclogenesis described by Montgomery et al. (2006). We find

that the aggregation takes place at a scale between 104 – 105 km3, which is 10–

100 times larger than their results.

Finally, we propose a simple conjecture in the cyclogenesis framework that combines

theories from previous researches and knowledge obtained from this study, shown in the

flowchart below.

Figure 29. Flow chart of an updated cyclogenesis framework combining the VHT paradigm and the role of stabilization caused by MCV.

Some questions remain of interest and can be discussed in future studies:

◼ As showed in 3.1, there seems to be a preference of position which large

convection are activated. According to previous studies, convection seems to

prefer to activate on the down-shear left of storm relative winds. Although

strong shear is known to be detrimental to tropical cyclone development due to

vortex tilting and ventilation of low entropy air, weakly-sheared environment

is also showed to be favorable for convection to aggregate (Tsai & Wu, 2017).

It would be interesting to conduct the experiment in a weak-moderately sheared

environment to inspect the net contribution of shear to genesis between these

competing effects.

◼ Will different initial soundings, such as soundings from Western Pacific Ocean,

or a perturbed initial water vapor mixing ratio, affect the outcome of the

experiment?

◼ Positive radial gradient of column integrated moist entropy flux divergence, or

Gross Moist Stability (GMS) is observed to reach maximum shortly prior

genesis (Tang, 2017). It would be interesting to compare the evolution of GMS

in these experiments.

Bibliography

Arakawa, A., & Wu, C.-M. (2013). A Unified Representation of Deep Moist Convection in Numerical Modeling of the Atmosphere. Part I. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 70(7), 1977-1992. doi: 10.1175/jas-d-12-0330.1

Bister, M., & Emanuel, K. A. (1997). The genesis of Hurricane Guillermo: TEXMEX analyses and a modeling study. Monthly weather review, 125(10), 2662-2682.

Carrillo, C. L., & Raymond, D. J. (2005). Moisture Tendency Equations in a Tropical Atmosphere. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 62(5), 1601-1613. doi:

10.1175/jas3424.1

Chien, M. H., & Wu, C. M. (2016). Representation of topography by partial steps using the immersed boundary method in a vector vorticity equation model (VVM).

Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 8(1), 212-223.

Dunkerton, T. J., Montgomery, M., & Wang, Z. (2009). Tropical cyclogenesis in a tropical wave critical layer: Easterly waves. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, 9(15).

Emanuel, K. A. (1989). The finite-amplitude nature of tropical cyclogenesis. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 46(22), 3431-3456.

Gjorgjievska, S., & Raymond, D. (2014). Interaction between dynamics and thermodynamics during tropical cyclogenesis. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(6), 3065-3082.

Haynes, P. H., & McIntyre, M. E. (1987). On the Evolution of Vorticity and Potential Vorticity in the Presence of Diabatic Heating and Frictional or Other Forces.

Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 44(5), 828-841. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<0828:Oteova>2.0.Co;2

Hendricks, E. A., Montgomery, M. T., & Davis, C. A. (2004). The role of “vortical” hot towers in the formation of tropical cyclone Diana (1984). Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 61(11), 1209-1232.

Houze Jr., R. A. (2004). Mesoscale convective systems. Reviews of Geophysics, 42(4).

doi: 10.1029/2004rg000150

Jung, J.-H., & Arakawa, A. (2008). A three-dimensional anelastic model based on the vorticity equation. Monthly weather review, 136(1), 276-294.

Kilroy, G., Smith, R. K., & Montgomery, M. T. (2017). A unified view of tropical cyclogenesis and intensification. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 143(702), 450-462. doi: 10.1002/qj.2934

Kilroy, G., Smith, R. K., & Montgomery, M. T. (2018). The role of heating and cooling associated with ice processes on tropical cyclogenesis and intensification.

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 144(710), 99-114. doi:

10.1002/qj.3187

Krueger, S. K., Fu, Q., Liou, K., & Chin, H.-N. S. (1995). Improvements of an ice-phase microphysics parameterization for use in numerical simulations of tropical convection. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 34(1), 281-287.

Kuo, K.-T., & Wu, C.-M. (2019). The Precipitation Hotspots of Afternoon Thunderstorms over the Taipei Basin: Idealized Numerical Simulations. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II.

Montgomery, M., Nicholls, M., Cram, T., & Saunders, A. (2006). A vortical hot tower route to tropical cyclogenesis. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 63(1), 355-386.

Nolan, D. S. (2007). What is the trigger for tropical cyclogenesis? Australian Meteorological Magazine, 56(4).

Raymond, D. J., Gjorgjievska, S., Sessions, S. L., & Fuchs, Ž. (2014). Tropical cyclogenesis and mid-level vorticity. Aust. Meteorol. Oceanogr. J, 64, 11-25.

Raymond, D. J., & Sessions, S. L. (2007). Evolution of convection during tropical cyclogenesis. Geophysical research letters, 34(6).

Raymond, D. J., Sessions, S. L., & Fuchs, Ž. (2007). A theory for the spinup of tropical depressions. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 133(628), 1743-1754. doi: 10.1002/qj.125

Raymond, D. J., Sessions, S. L., & López, C. C. (2011). Thermodynamics of tropical cyclogenesis in the northwest Pacific. Journal of Geophysical Research:

Atmospheres, 116(D18).

Raymond, D. J., Sessions, S. L., Sobel, A. H., & Fuchs, Ž. (2009). The Mechanics of Gross Moist Stability. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 1(3), n/a-n/a. doi: 10.3894/james.2009.1.9

Rotunno, R., & Emanuel, K. A. (1987). An air–sea interaction theory for tropical cyclones.

Part II: Evolutionary study using a nonhydrostatic axisymmetric numerical model.

Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 44(3), 542-561.

Schubert, W. H., & Hack, J. J. (1982). Inertial stability and tropical cyclone development.

Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 39(8), 1687-1697.

Tang, B. H. (2017). Coupled Dynamic–Thermodynamic Forcings during Tropical Cyclogenesis. Part II: Axisymmetric Experiments. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 74(7), 2279-2291. doi: 10.1175/jas-d-17-0049.1

Tsai, J.-Y., & Wu, C.-M. (2016). Critical transitions of stratocumulus dynamical systems due to perturbation in free-atmosphere moisture. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, 76, 1-13.

Tsai, W. M., & Wu, C. M. (2017). The environment of aggregated deep convection.

Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 9(5), 2061-2078.

Wang, Z. (2018). What is the Key Feature of Convection Leading up to Tropical Cyclone Formation? Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 75(5), 1609-1629.

Wang, Z., & Hankes, I. (2016). Moisture and Precipitation Evolution during Tropical Cyclone Formation as Revealed by the SSM/I–SSMIS Retrievals. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 73(7), 2773-2781. doi: 10.1175/jas-d-15-0306.1

Wu, C. M., & Arakawa, A. (2011). Inclusion of surface topography into the vector vorticity equation model (VVM). Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 3(2).

相關文件