• 沒有找到結果。

Chapter  4   -­‐  Characteristics  of  YouTube  Trolls:  The  Case  of  PewDiePie

4.2   Deception

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

most  trolls  were  fairly  direct  with  their  aggression,  jelena  jankovic  (20)(21)  was  the  only  troll   to  have  exclusively  exhibited  passive-­‐aggressive  tendencies:  

  Example  (20)  

(Mohammad  “TheMtarGaMer”  Matari):  because  your  a  dumbass  and  being  owned  on  the   internent.  hey  let  me  join.  #momgetthecamrea  

(jelena  jankovic):  #momthisguymispelledcamera   Example  (21)  

(Razerware146):  omfg  hahaha  Facepalm  It's  not  a  stereotype  if  it's  true  hahaha.  

(jelena  jankovic):  WALLPALM      A  stereotype  doesn't  need  to  be  true...      #Derp    

It  is  also  worth  mentioning  that  jelena  jankovic  “appeared”  to  have  used  her  real  name  and   profile  picture,  indicating  that  she  is  female.  If  so,  her  non-­‐anonymous  status  and  female   identity  might  be  significant  factors  in  assessing  her  rather  tame  commenting  style  in   comparison  with  other  trolls.  

 

4.2  Deception  

In  previous  studies,  a  large  factor  in  trollish  behavior  includes  deception.  In  this   study,  deception  only  proved  to  be  present  in  about  10  (43%)  of  the  observed  trolls.    As  per   Donath’s  (1999)  definition,  deception  refers  to  trolls  who  try  to  establish  themselves  as  a   legitimate  part  of  the  community  while  in  truth,  they  are  seeking  to  deceptively  disrupt  the   group  undercover.  This  is  also  true  for  several  YouTube  trolls,  to  an  extent.  Hardaker  (2010)   noted  in  her  study  that  rarely  will  trolls  go  on-­‐record  to  reveal  their  trollish  intents  

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

beforehand  which  also  true  for  several  YouTube  trolls  who  stalwartly  denied  their  troll   identity  when  accused:  

 

Example  (22)  

(Babywannabe)  stfu  am  not  a  troll  and  get  the  fuck  out  of  here  little  boy!  

Example  (23)  

(Orange  Tortoise)  IM  NOT  TROLLING  FUCK  U   Example  (24)  

(Σκεπτόμενη)  stop  trolling  bitch!  

 

In  examples  (22)  and  (23),  other  users’  accusations  of  trolling  leads  to  denial  and  further   hostility  by  the  trolls,  while  example  (24)’s  Σκεπτόμενη  even  goes  so  far  as  to  counter-­‐

accuse  others  of  trolling  when  Σκεπτόμενη  is,  in  fact,  the  real  troll.    Some  trolls  will  also  go   one  step  further  by  attempting  to  diminish  their  troll  status  through  reasoning  and  

deflection:  

 

Example  (25)  

(Rachel  Lambert)  Lol.  Troll  much?  

(Lyric)  Troll  a  word  that  is  used  by  uneducated  unsophisticated  people.  Guess  that  explains   you.  

Example  (26)  

(BBL  Podcast)  A  troll  is  someone  who  just  says  something  to  piss  someone  off,  i  can't  be  a   troll  because  it's  my  honest  opinion.  if  i  was  a  troll  i  would  only  be  saying  shit  like  

"PewDiePie  sucks  hahahahahahahaahahahah"  

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

 

Lyric  (25)  deflects  accusations  of  being  a  troll  back  to  his  original  accuser  while  BBL  Podcast   (26)  says  he  is  not  purposely  antagonizing  other  users,  but  his  original  comment,  “Calm   Down,  It's  just  PewDiePie.  Nobody  important,”  appears  to  indicate  otherwise.  

The  most  common  form  of  deceptive  trolling  amongst  the  PewDiePie  community   was  based  on  flawed  rhetoric  regarding  PewDiePie’s  subscriber  count.  In  one  of  PewDiePie’s   videos,  “Mean  Comments,”  dated  May  2014,  he  ridiculed  a  comment  posted  on  one  of  his   videos  -­‐  “how  can  pewdiepie  have  26  million  subscribers  while  there  are  only  7-­‐8  million   people  on  the  earth??  Fake  accunts..?”  While  it  is  unclear  if  this  video  launched  or  merely   catalyzed  this  comment  into  meme  status,  numerous  similar  copycats  posting  near  identical   comments  have  since  run  rampant  throughout  PewDiePie’s  videos,  including  four  of  the   trolls  identified  in  this  study:  

 

Example  (27)  

(Σκεπτόμενη)  HOW  is  it  possible  for  this  video  to  have  13  million  views  when  there  are  only   7  million  people  on  planet  earth?  

Example  (28)  

(MLG  POTATO)  how  dufuq  is  there  20  million  views  theres  7  mil  people  on  the  planet  omg   hacks  

Example  (29)  

(EpicNEd)  If  there's  only  7000  people  in  the  world,  why  is  does  he  have  32  million   subscribers?  Fake  acunts.  

Example  (30)  

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

(jelena  jankovic)  How  PewDiePie  has  32  billion  subscribers  when  there  is  only  7  billion   people  in  this  world?  (__)  waits  for  12-­‐year  old  kids  

 

Though  the  troll’s  intentions  were  obvious  to  many  community  members,  there  was  also  a   large  swath  of  users  who  believed  that  these  trolls  were  genuinely  misinformed  and  thus   took  it  upon  themselves  to  rectify  the  inaccuracy  (this  method  of  trolling  is  also  heavily   characteristic  of  ‘disruption’  as  explained  in  the  next  section).  Thus,  these  trolls  were  all   successful  in  attracting  large  swaths  of  attention  from  the  fan  community.  Σκεπτόμενη,  MLG   POTATO  and  EpicNEd  in  examples  (27),  (28)  and  (29)  continued  to  feign  ignorance  and   vehemently  denied  all  attempts  by  community  members  who  attempted  to  correct  their   original  comment.  Only  jelena  jankovic  in  example  (30),  who  made  her  trollish  intentions   clear  from  the  beginning  by  writing  “waits  for  12-­‐year  old  kids,”  did  not  attempt  to  prolong   the  ruse,  so  it  cannot  be  said  that  her  comments  were  intended  to  be  deceptive  like  the   others.  Nonetheless,  her  original  comment  still  managed  to  accumulate  a  long  list  of   comments.  

Other  than  these  examples,  there  were  rarely  instances  in  which  users  doubted  the   true  identity  and  intentions  of  a  troll.  Therefore,  trolls  were  either  not  able  to  successfully   deceive  others  of  their  identity  or  they  never  had  any  intentions  of  truly  deceiving  

community  members  into  believing  they  were  legitimate  members  of  the  PewDiePie  fan   community.  Deception  may  be  a  less  pronounced  characteristic  in  the  context  of  YouTube   because  it  is  simply  not  required  for  “trolling,”  whereas  in  more  traditional  forms  of   asynchronous  CMC  such  as  UseNet  forums,  open  hostility  could  lead  to  swift  banishment   from  the  community,  never  to  be  seen  again.  While  there  are  methods  for  flagging  spam   and  offensive  comments  on  YouTube,  given  the  massive  scale  of  the  entire  site  and  the  fact  

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

that  the  comment  sections  are  mostly  left  unmoderated  by  any  one  person,  it  is  not  as  easy   to  control  the  sheer  number  of  trolls  who  easily  obtain  lulz  through  overt  aggression.  

Deception  is,  however,  most  commonly  attributed  to  disruptive  troll  practices  explained   further  in  detail  below.