Open Questionnaire (Government Staff)

79 No

Questions

Name/Institution

What is the Program for this area

How is your institution managing this area?

What is the strategy to improve the condition in this area?

Is the

program has meet the requirement /target?

What is the difficulties/proble m in managing this area?

What is the future planning for this area?

1 REZA FAHLEVI (Head of Culture

& Tourism Dept.)

Physic:

1. Preservation of Peunayong area as the historical site.

2. Maintaining the old buildings (old shop houses) that contain historical value.

3. Revitalization of Peunayong area.

Non Physic:

1.Conducting Peunayong

festival (culture festival)

2.Promote Aceh &

Tionghoa culture thorugh the festival.

3.Prepare

Peunayong as one of heritage City

There are no specific

regulations for this area since this area jointly managed with other relevant department.

 Promote this area through ‘heritage city program’.

 Coordinate with all relevant agencies in order to have the same vision about the heritage city program.

Not 100%

yet, still implement continuously.

 Not enough funding.

 Community perception

(society considers that Peunayong festival contrary to the Islamic Shari ‘a.

 Difficult to control street vendors while held the festival.

 Implementing

‘Heritage City program.

 Improve the physic & and non physic condition hence this area become beautiful, clean and healthy.

 Proposed fund proposal to renovate the historic building in this area.

 Reorganize the river bank in this area.

Table 12: Interview result of Government

80 site.

2 T. FAISAL RIZA (Head of PBL Unit-Public Work Dept)

 Construction of pavement, street

lamp and

providing vegetation.

No direct

intervention from provincial level because this area belongs to the office of Public Work-City level.

Stimulate the public work-city level to implement the program

Not yet

achieved the desired goals

Difficult to adjust the budget with program

Improvements to pedestrian

accessibility

3 RAMOS (Head of Spatial Planning Unit- City Public Work Dept).

 Construction of pedestrian.

 Improved sanitation.

 Street lamp installation.

 Preserve the historic old building.

 Renovate old buildings that are not in good condition, without losing its historical value.

 Revitalization.

 Continue to implement the existing program which considers budget

availability.

Not yet, because construction

has not

completed yet.

 Insufficient budget.

 Public behavior which was not supports the government program.

 Continue the area development such us: pedestrian &

sanitation.

 Support the

‘Heritage City’

program.

4 SUBHAN S.E

(Head of Parking

Unit-Transportation Dept)

 Open parking place in front of fish market.

 Blocking the road for car access in the particular time

to reduce

crowdedness.

 Mobile patrol to control traffic

(everyday from 9.30-12 am).

 Disseminate information to the people regarding parking/traffic

 Improve control/patrol system.

 Construct appropriate parking place.

 Exceed the target (for parking area in front of fish

market).

 But in another place the program

 There has never been proper evaluation of PAD in the city of Banda Aceh.

 There is no authority to relocate the street vendor.

 Construct new parking building in this area.

81 regulation.

 Perform an audit for the people who against

regulations.

not achieved the target (Kartini road).

5 SYARIFUDDIN

(Head of

Peunayong village)

 Sanitation.

 Footpath.

 Construct small kiosk for Chinese community in this area.

 Organize mass work for area

maintenance.

 Managing the residence data.

 Lead the residence.

 Improve the security system

(by doing

Siskamling &

disaster preparedness).

 Mass work for healthy

environment (1x/month).

 Advocate the residence due to healthy issue.

Already meet the target in terms of security.

 Village leader has no authority because the area belongs to local government.

 There is no land

for office

construction.

 Not enough fund to

maintain/develop this area.

 It’s difficult to control the street vendors.

 Develop

Peunayong area as culinary area

& tourist area.

 Reorganize the river bank.

 Support the government program

(Heritage city program).

6 JALALUDDIN

ST,M.T (Head of DK3/Sanitation

and Park

Department)

 Managing environmental cleanliness.

 Advocate the community related

environmental cleanliness.

 Garbage collection (4x/day)

 Provide garbage container in several spots in this area.

 Socialization of environmental hygiene and prohibition throw garbage anywhere.

Not 100%, because the street

vendors still against the regulation regarding the cleanliness issues.

Community

perception. They still not have the awareness how to keep the clean environment.

 Socialize about waste separation.

 Improve

monitoring of environmental issues.

82

7 AZHARI, SP

(Head of

Landscape unit-DK3 Dept).

 Planting the tree along the shops.

 Maintained the existing garden in this area.

 Provide specialized personnel to maintain the garden

(contract system-2 shift/day)

 Socialize about the beauty of the environment through mobile campaign and signboard.

Not yet. Community

perception (some of the shop owner rejected the plantation

program).

 Add plants to support the development of green cities

8 RAMLI RASYID (Mayor

Assistant).

 Produce master plan.

 Organized planning meetings related action

plans by

related department.

 Coordinate the related

department

due to

program implementatio n in this area.

 Approve the action plans submitted by related

department if it is meet the requirements.

 Support all the program

especially

tourism sector

such us

developing chinese culture in this area, improve the security system in this area, promote Aceh local custom, improve

structure

facilities in this area.

Not yet, still in progress.

Limited budget to implement all program.

 Invites all Malaysia cultural leaders to share experiences and ideas on Islamic tourism

development.

 Community

awareness on how importance culture is.

 Change the

mindset of

Acehnese people hence better quality life could be achieve.

 Make cooperation with investors to develop this area.

83

9 MARDALENA

(Sub-sector head of Infrastructure Planning unit).

 Implementing water front city concept

(coordination with related department).

 Facilitate related dept. in set up the heritage city concept.

 No direct management, only

supporting related

department to implement the program in this area.

Held coordination meeting with related department to analyze the problems in this area.

Not yet, still in gradual development.

 There is no integration between the programs from related

departments because each department working based on their budget.

 Limited fund hence not all of the program

could be

implemented.

 Establishing

cooperation with investors.

10 MIRFATA (Head of Technical Implementation Unit, Market Dept).

 Manage and maintain the whole market in Peunayong.

 Make rules for street vendors.

 Disciplined street vendors who are not registered and who violate the rules.

 Overcome market problems.

 Managing markets and street

vendors.

 Set up the market to be more clean and tidy.

 Provide

counseling to both sellers and buyers related environmental cleanliness.

 Implementing regulations for sellers and buyers.

Not 100%

yet, still in improvement .

 Difficult to control the street vendors.

 Lack of awareness of traders and buyers to keep the environment clean.

 Limited budget.

84

Based on interview with the Aceh government it can be concluded that:

- There is lack coordination between related department/agencies into implement the program in this area.

- The main problems are limited funding to improve the area condition.

- Different perception between government and community due to lack coordination among both parties.

- Lack of community awareness related several issues i.e. environmental problem.

Thus the above inferred the government side, while the people also have a different perception of the government. For more details can be seen from the table below (Table 13) of the similarities and differences between both parties:

Table 13: Similarities and Difference opinion between government & public

No Variable Government

User

Remarks Seller Visitors

Area Assessment

1 Market Chaos Agree Not Agree Agree

2 Limited Parking Space Availability Agree Not Agree Agree

3 Misusing of Parking place Agree Not Agree Agree

Reorganizing the Area

4 Requirement of reorganizing the area 80/20 50/50 Agree Amount in percentage 5 No changes expected in this area Not Agree Not Agree Not Agree

6 Parking reorganizing 20/80 50/50 Agree Amount in

percentage

7 Market reorganizing Agree Not Agree Agree

8 Pedestrian construction Agree Agree Agree

9 Misuse pedestrian by street vendors Agree Not Agree Agree 10 Renovation of Historical Building Agree Agree Agree

11 Greening the area Agree Agree Agree

12 Waste management Agree 50/50 Agree

85

13 Cleanliness of the area Agree Agree Agree

14 Reorganising the area could improve citizen life

Agree Agree Agree

15 New design requirement Agree 50/50 Agree Amount in

percentage Vitality

16 This area known as Central Business District

Agree Agree Agree

17 This area not vital Not Agree Not Agree Not Agree

Accessibility & Circulation

18 Access Difficulty Not Agree Not Agree Not Agree

19 Poor intern access Agree Not Agree Agree

20 Street vendors caused the access problem

Agree Not Agree Agree

Tourism Potentiality

21 No tourism potentiality Not Agree Agree Not Agree

22 No culinary center Not Agree Not Agree Not Agree

23 Attractive historical building Agree Not Agree Agree 24 Waterfront development could not be

developed

Not Agree Agree Not Agree

Image of the Area

25 This area is not important Not Agree Not Agree Not Agree

26 Area image as trading area Agree Agree Agree

27 This area not provide citizen needs Not Agree Not Agree Not Agree

28 Area dependency Agree Agree Agree

29 This area could support economic development

Agree Agree Agree

30 Area image as China Town Agree Agree Agree

The table above has shows the persistence of the gap between the government and the public. This is probably related to the different opinion and the lack of coordination

86

between the government and the community in implementing the program, and it is strongly recommended that linear cooperation between both parties should establish through independent group which represent both parties and other stakeholders in order to success the revitalization program (Figure 58).

Figure 58: Coordination chart between Government, Community and Stakeholders

The independent group will consist of representatives from government, the community and stakeholders and they will have responsibility to control the revitalization process. By establishing this group it is expected that will be common perception within the parties hence the revitalization program will be implemented successfully.

87

在文檔中 中 華 大 學 碩 士 論 文 (頁 91-100)