Monascus has been used in oriental fermented foods
for thousands of years.
1)Red mold rice fermented with
Monascus spp. produces bioactive metabolites such as
g-aminobutyric acid (GABA), polyketides monacolin K, and
some pigments, which, respectively, function as an
anti-hy-pertension agent,
2)a cholesterol-lowering drug,
3—5)and
pos-sess antibacterial activity.
6)Monascus pigments, secondary
metabolites possessing mainly azaphilone skeletons, have
traditionally been used as natural food colorants.
1)Many
other metabolites have also been reported in previous
re-search,
7—15)most of them isolated from red mold rice
ob-tained from solid fermentation. In contrast, the metabolites
contained in the mycelia pellets from submerged cultures
have rarely been investigated. The antioxidant effects
exhib-ited in the methanol extract fraction of the mycelia pellets
of M. pilosus BCRC 38072 were monitored using the
2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging
method.
16,17)Subsequent chemical examination of the methanol
extract of mycelia from M. pilosus led to the isolation of
two new phenylacetic acid derivatives, monaspilosin (1)
and monaspiloindole (2), and one new pyranoindole alkaloid,
monaspyranoindole (3), along with twelve known
com-pounds. This paper reports on the isolation, structural
eluci-dation and the DPPH free radical scavenging activity of these
fungal metabolites.
Results and Discussion
Extensive chromatographic purification of the
EtOAc-sol-uble fraction of the MeOH extract of the pellets of M. pilosus
afforded fifteen compounds. The new compound 1, isolated
as colorless oil, was assigned the molecular formula
C
16H
16O
3Na by ESI-MS ([M
Na]
, m/z 279) and
HR-ESI-MS. IR absorptions were observed at 3403, 1712, 1612,
1514 cm
1pointing to the presence of hydroxyl, an ester
car-bonyl group, and a benzene ring. The UV spectrum showed
maximum absorption at 277 nm, and a bathochromic shift in
alkaline solution indicated the presence of a phenol
deriva-tive.
18)This was confirmed by the
1H-NMR spectrum, which
showed one proton at d
H4.90 (1H, br s) assigned to OH-15,
which disappeared upon addition of D
2O. The
1
H-NMR
spectrum of 1 showed a mono-substituted phenyl moiety at
d
H7.09 (5H, m, H-2—6). An AA
XX pattern at d
H6.72,
7.00 (each 2H, d, J
8.8 Hz, H-14, 16 and H-13, 17)
sug-gested a 1,4-disubstituted benzene ring in 1. In addition, the
1H-NMR and HSQC spectra revealed the presence of a
ben-zylic methylene group [d
H3.60 (2H, s)]. An oxymethylene
unit [d
H4.26 (2H, t, J
7.0 Hz, H-10)] split into a triplet due
to coupling with another methylene group [d
H2.84 (2H, t,
J
7.0 Hz, H-11)]. The above signals and the COSY
spec-trum established the presence of the partial substructures:
fragments, 1a, 1b, and 1c, for compound 1. The entire
skele-ton of 1 was constructed from the HMBC spectrum (Fig. 2).
The
2J and
3J correlations of the signal at
d
H3.60 (H-7) and
d
H4.26 (H-10), with the carbon signal at d
C171.6 (C-8),
helped to establish the connections of fragments 1a and 1b
with the carbonyl group at C-8. That is, fragments 1a and 1b
can be connected to produce 1d. In addition, the cross peak
between
d
H2.84 (H-11) and d
C130.0 (C-13, 17), as well as
d
H4.26 (H-10) and d
C129.6 (C-12), suggest that fragments
1c and 1d were linked together at C-11. The structure was
further confirmed by
13C-NMR, DEPT, COSY, NOESY (Fig.
1), HSQC, and HMBC (Fig. 2) experiments. Thus, the
struc-ture of 1 was determined to be a phenylacetic acid
2-(4-hy-droxyphenyl)ethyl ester, and was given the name
monaspi-losin.
Compound 2, also a colorless oil, was assigned the
molec-ular formula C
18H
17NO
2, as deduced by ESI-MS and
HR-ESI-MS. The presence of an ester group was revealed by an
394 Vol. 56, No. 3
Secondary Metabolites from the Mycelia of the Fungus Monascus pilosus
BCRC 38072
Ming-Jen C
HENG,
aMing-Der W
U,
aIh-Sheng C
HEN,
b,#and Gwo-Fang Y
UAN*
,aaBioresource Collection and Research Center (BCRC), Food Industry Research and Development Institute; Hsinchu 300,
Taiwan, Republic of China: and bCollege of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University; Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, Republic
of China. Received November 12, 2007; accepted December 11, 2007; published online December 13, 2007
Three new compounds, including two phenylacetic acid derivatives, monaspilosin (1) and monaspiloindole (2), and one pyranoindole alkaloid, monaspyranoindole (3), were isolated from the EtOAc-soluble fraction of the MeOH extract of the mycelia of Monascus pilosus BCRC 38072. Twelve known compounds were also obtained in this study. The structures were elucidated by 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. This is the first report of Monascus metabolites with an indole ring. All isolates were also evaluated for their scavenging properties toward the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) in TLC autographic and spectroscopic as-says.
Key words Monascus pilosus; Eurotiaceae; phenylacetic acid; pyranoindole; 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl Chem. Pharm. Bull. 56(3) 394—397 (2008)
Notes
© 2008 Pharmaceutical Society of Japan ∗ To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: [email protected]
IR absorption at 1716 cm
1and by a resonance signal in the
13C-NMR spectrum at d
C
171.3. The presence of a NH group
in the molecule was revealed by a band at 3410 (br) cm
1in
the IR spectrum, which was confirmed by the signal at d
H8.00 (1H, br s), which disappeared upon addition of D
2O.
The UV spectrum showed a maximum absorption at 280 nm,
indicating the presence of a phenylacetic acid skeleton.
18)The
1H-NMR spectrum of compound 2 was similar to the
above compound, monaspilosin (1), except that the
substitu-tent at C-11 in 2 was a 1H-indol-3-yl moiety in place of the
p-hydroxyphenyl group in 1. Signals for the indol-3-yl
moi-ety appeared at d
H7.13 (1H, br t, J
7.8 Hz, H-18), 7.20 (1H,
br t, J
7.8 Hz, H-17), 7.36 (1H, br d, J7.8 Hz, H-16), and
7.61 (1H, br d, J
7.8 Hz, H-19), suggesting four coupling
aromatic protons along with a nitrogen-bearing olefinic
pro-ton at d
H6.93 (1H, t, J
1.8 Hz, H-13). The above
assign-ments were verified by NOESY correlations between d
H3.09
(H-11)/d
H6.93 (H-13) and d
H7.61 (H-19), respectively. The
olefinic proton signal at d
H6.93 (H-13) was correlated with a
methylene carbon at d
C24.7 (C-11), as well as d
H4.38
(H-10) and d
C112.0 (C-12) from the HMBC spectrum,
suggest-ing that the indole moiety linked at C-11. The structure was
further confirmed by
13C-NMR, DEPT, COSY, NOESY (Fig.
2), HSQC, and HMBC (Fig. 3) experiments. Thus, the
struc-ture of 2 was determined to be a phenylacetic acid
2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl ester, and designated monaspiloindole.
Com-pound 2 was first isolated from a natural source, although it
has been mentioned by Yamamoto as a reactant for
synthe-sizing a new class of anti-methicillin-resistant
Staphylococ-cus aureus (anti-MRSA) and anti-vancomycin-resistant
en-terococci (anti-VRE) agents.
19)Compound 3 was also isolated as colorless oil. The
HR-ESI-MS spectrum gave a molecule ion [M
Na]
at
m/z 224.3139, consistent with a molecular formula of
C
13H
15NONa. UV spectrum showed maximum absorption at
288 nm, indicating the presence of an indole skeleton.
18)Its
IR spectrum revealed NH absorption at 3320 cm
1. Analysis
of the
1H-NMR spectrum of 3 revealed four typical mutually
coupling aromatic protons of indole alkaloid at d
H7.11 (1H,
td, J
7.6, 1.0 Hz, H-7), 7.17 (1H, td, J7.6, 1.0 Hz, H-6),
7.33 (1H, dd, J
7.6, 1.0 Hz, H-5), 7.49 (1H, dd, J7.6,
1.0 Hz, H-8) and one NH group at d
H7.66 (1H, br s,
ex-changeable with D
2O). In addition, the appearance of a set of
A
2X
2pattern signals at d
H2.80 (2H, t, J
5.4 Hz, H-4) and
4.05 (2H, t, J
5.4 Hz, H-3), accompanied by a singlet of two
methyl groups at d
H1.57 (6H, s, CH
3-9, 10). The HMBC
correlations (Fig. 3) from d
H1.57 (CH
3-9, 10) to d
C138.9
(C-1a); d
H2.80 (H-4) to d
C106.9, 138.9 (C-4a, 1a), and d
H4.05 (H-3) to d
C106.9 (C-4a) verify the junction of the
1,1-dimethyldihydropyrano ring to the indole moiety at C-1a, and
4a. The other key correlations of HMBC are illustrated in
Fig. 3. Based on the above data, the structure of 3, named
monaspyranoindole, was elucidated as
1,1-dimethyl-1,3,4,9-tetrahydropyrano[3,4-b]indole, which was further confirmed
by
13C-NMR, COSY, NOESY (Fig. 2), HSQC and HMBC
(Fig. 3) experiments. Compound 3 was first isolated from a
natural source, though it has since been synthesized.
20)The other known isolates, b-sitosteryl stearate,
21)a
mix-ture of b-sitosterol and stigmasterol,
22)ergosterol,
23)p-hy-droxybenzoic acid,
24)methylparaben,
25)trans-caffeic acid,
26)linoleic acid,
27)cyclo-(
L
-Pro-
L-Tyr),
28)5-(hydroxymethyl)fur-fural,
29)(Z)-pulchellalactam,
30)and
(4R,5S)-5-hydroxyhexan-4-olide,
31)were readily identified by comparison of their
physico-chemical, spectroscopic, and mass-spectrometric
data with the literature. Except for linoleic acid, this is the
first time any of the compounds described above have been
isolated from Monascus spp. The radical-scavenging
proper-ties of the fifteen compounds were evaluated against the
DPPH radical.
16)By using DPPH as a TLC spray reagent,
p-hydroxybenzoic acid and trans-caffeic acid (5, 10
mg)
ap-peared as strong yellow spots against a purple background,
while compound 1 displayed moderate yellow spots, and
March 2008 395
Fig. 1. New Compounds Isolated from Monascus pilosus
Fig. 2. NOESY Interactions of Monaspilosin (1), Monaspiloindole (2), and Monaspyranoindole (3)
other compounds did not react with the radical. The phenol
derivatives p-hydroxybenzoic acid and trans-caffeic acid
were more active than 1 in the above concentration range.
The free radical scavenging effects of the isolates (compound
1, p-hydroxybenzoic acid and trans-caffeic acid),
correspond-ing to the intensity of quenchcorrespond-ing of the DPPH radical, were
evaluated by spectroscopic assay. At a concentration of
50
m
M, the test compounds showed moderate DPPH radical
scavenging activity, with 40, 65, and 87% inhibition for
com-pound 1, p-hydroxybenzoic acid and trans-caffeic acid,
re-spectively, with trans-caffeic acid the most active compound
in this study.
In summary, most of recent studies on secondary
metabo-lites from Monascus have investigated red mold rice and
whole broth. These metabolites are azaphilone,
15)fura-noisophthalides,
15)amino acid,
13,15)polyketides,
1)and fatty
acids.
1)Nevertheless, the chemical characteristics, as well as
the biological activities, of many Monascus metabolites still
remain unclear. In this study we focus on the secondary
metabolites appearing in the mycelia of Monascus
sub-merged culture, which has seldom been reported on. The
three metabolites 1, 2 and 3, phenyl ester, indole, and
pyra-noindole alkaloid found in this study are new, naturally
oc-curring compounds. Interestingly, this is the first report of an
indole alkaloid isolated from this Monascus spp. Compound
1, p-hydroxybenzoic acid and trans-caffeic acid were found
to have significant antioxidant properties, as determined by
experiments with 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH),
which suggests their ability to efficiently scavenge free
radi-cals. Compounds 1 and 2 have similar structures, but the
lat-ter does not show the ability to efficiently scavenge free
radi-cals, which implies that the presence of a phenol group is
crucial for activity. The hydrogen donating ability was
asso-ciated with the radical scavenging effects of antioxidants on
the DPPH radical. Structures containing phenolic hydroxyl
and carboxylic acid moieties have long been recognized to
function as electron or hydrogen donors. Thus, the higher
DPPH radical scavenging activity of p-hydroxybenzoic acid
and trans-caffeic acid may be related to the phenolic and
car-boxylic acid groups present in the molecules. These results
suggest that Monascus has distinct and diverse metabolites
which arise under different fermentation conditions. It may
therefore be possible to find more new bioactive natural
products by cultivating Monascus under different conditions.
Experimental
General All melting points were determined on a Yanaco micro-melting point apparatus and were uncorrected. Optical rotations were measured on a Jasco P-1020 digital polarimeter, UV spectra were obtained on a Jasco UV-240 spectrophotometer in MeOH, and IR spectra (KBr or neat) were taken on a Perkin-Elmer System 2000 FT-IR spectrometer. 1D (1H, 13C, DEPT) and 2D (COSY, NOESY, HSQC, HMBC) NMR spectra using CDCl3and CD3OD as solvent were recorded on a Varian Unity Plus 400 (400 MHz for 1H-NMR, 100 MHz for 13C-NMR) and Varian INOVA-500 (500 MHz for 1H-NMR, 125 MHz for 13C-NMR) spectrometer. Chemical shifts were inter-nally referenced to the solvent signals in CDCl3(
1H,
d 7.26; 13C, d 77.0) with Tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard. Low-resolution ESI-MS spectra were obtained on an API 3000 (Applied Biosystems) and high-resolution ESI-MS spectra on a Bruker Daltonics APEX II 30e spectrometer. Low-resolution EI-MS spectra were recorded on a Quattro GC/MS spec-trometer having a direct inlet system. Silica gel (70—230, 230—400 mesh) (Merck) was used for column chromatography, and silica gel 60 F-254 (Merck) was used for TLC and prep. TLC. For radical scavenging TLC au-tographic assay, DPPH (Sigma) was used as spray reagent.
Microorganism Monascus pilosus BCRC 38072 was used throughout
this study, and specimens deposited at the Bioresource Collection and Re-search Center (BCRC) of the Food Industry ReRe-search and Development In-stitute.
396 Vol. 56, No. 3
Table 1. 1H- and 13C-NMR Data for Compounds 1—3 in CDCl
3(400 MHz)
1 2 3
No.
dC dH(mult; J, Hz) dC dH(mult; J, Hz) dC dH(mult; J, Hz)
1 133.9 — 134.1 — 71.8 — 1a — — — 138.9 — 2 129.3 7.09 (m) 129.3 7.30 (m) — 3 127.1 7.09 (m) 127.0 7.30 (m) 60.5 4.05 (t, 5.4) 4 128.5 7.09 (m) 128.5 7.30 (m) 22.4 2.80 (t, 5.4) 4a — — — 106.9 — 5 127.1 7.09 (m) 127.0 7.30 (m) 110.8 7.33 (dd, 7.6, 1.0) 5a — — — 127.0 — 6 129.3 7.09 (m) 129.3 7.30 (m) 121.7 7.17 (td, 7.6, 1.0) 7 41.4 3.60 (s) 41.5 3.63 (s) 119.6 7.11 (td, 7.6, 1.0) 8 171.6 — 171.6 — 118.3 7.49 (dd, 7.6, 1.0) 8a — — — 135.7 — 9 — — — 27.9 1.57 (s) 10 65.6 4.26 (t, 7.0) 65.0 4.38 (t, 7.0) 27.9 1.57 (s) 11 34.1 2.84 (t, 7.0) 24.7 3.09 (td, 7.0, 1.8) — — 12 129.6 — 112.0 — — — 13 130.0 7.00 (d, 8.8) 122.0 6.93 (t, 1.8) — — 14 115.3 6.72 (d, 8.8) — — — 15 154.2 — 136.1 — — — 16 115.3 6.72 (d, 8.8) 111.1 7.36 (br d, 7.8) — — 17 130.0 7.00 (d, 8.8) 122.1 7.20 (br t, 7.8) — — 18 — — 119.4 7.13 (br t, 7.8) — — 19 — — 118.8 7.61 (br d, 7.8) — — 20 — — 127.4 — — — OH-15 — 4.90 (br s) — — — NH — — 8.00 (br s) — 7.66 (br s)
Media The inoculum’s medium contained: malt extract, 3 g; yeast extract, 3 g; glucose, 5 g; agar, 1.5 g; and distilled water 1 l. The initial pH of the medium was 8. The synthetic culture medium contained: glucose, 20 g; monosodium L-glutamate (MSG), 10 g; K2HPO4, 5 g; KH2PO4, 5 g; MgSO4· 7H2O, 1.0 g; KCl, 0.5 g; ZnSO4· 7H2O, 0.01 g; FeSO4· 7H2O, 0.01 g; and MnSO4· H2O, 0.003 g per liter of distilled water. The initial pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.5.
Cultivation Methods The slant culture was kept on PDA (potato dex-trose agar) Difco. Spores of strains were prepared by growth on PDA slants for 14 d at 28 °C. Spores were washed with sterile water. A suspension of 107spores was used to incubate a 5 l Erlenmeyer flask containing 2 l inocu-lum medium, which was incubated at 28 °C on a rotary shaker for 3 d. This inoculum was then transferred to a 50 l fermentor (B. Braun, Germany) con-taining 30 l of synthetic medium, operated at 100 rpm and 30 °C, with an aeration rate of 0.3 vvm. After 14 d of cultivation, the pellet mycelia har-vested from the culture broth were used as samples for further extraction.
Extraction and Isolation The dried mycelia of the M. pilosus BCRC 38072 (2 kg) were extracted three times with MeOH at room temperature. The methanol syrup extract was partitioned between EtOAc and H2O (1 : 1) to afford EtOAc (2.5 g) and H2O (10.2 g) soluble fractions. The EtOAc-solu-ble fraction (2.5 g) was chromatographed over silica gel (75 g, 70—230 mesh), eluting with n-hexane and enriched with EtOAc to produce ten frac-tions (A1—A10). Fraction A4 (0.56 g) was subjected to a silica gel (18 g) chromatography by eluting with n-hexane–EtOAc (100 : 1), enriched with EtOAc, to furnish 20 fractions (A4-1—A4-20). Fraction A4-11 (21.0 mg) was purified by preparative TLC (n-hexane–EtOAc, 5 : 1) to give monaspyra-noindole (3) (1.3 mg), (4R,5S)-5-hydroxyhexan-4-olide (6.2 mg), and ergo-sterol (2.9 mg). Fraction A5 (125.5 mg) was subjected to a silica gel (3 g) chromatography by eluting with n-hexane–EtOAc (10 : 1), enriched with EtOAc, to furnish 8 fractions (A5-1—A5-8). Fraction A5-4 (7.5 mg) was pu-rified by preparative TLC (n-hexane–EtOAc, 15 : 1) to furnish monaspilosin (1) (2.0 mg). Fraction A5-5 (12.5 mg) was purified by preparative TLC (n-hexane–EtOAc, 5 : 1) to yield b-sitosteryl stearate (4.0 mg), and linoleic acid (9.8 mg). Fraction A6 (214.3 mg), eluting with n-hexane–acetone (20 : 1), was further separated using silica gel column chromatography and prepara-tive TLC (n-hexane–EtOAc (5 : 1)) and gave monaspiloindole (2) (2.7 mg), (Z)-pulchellalactam (21.7 mg), and a mixture of b-sitosterol and stigmasterol (8.8 mg). Fraction A7 (312.4 mg) was repeatedly chromatographed over sil-ica gel and purified by preparative TLC to afford p-hydroxybenzoic acid (4.2 mg), 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural (14.1 mg), and methylparaben (2.5 mg). Fraction A9 (290.3 mg) was chromatographed on a silica gel (9 g) column, eluting with CHCl3–EtOAc (20 : 1) to yield 12 fractions (A9-1—A9-12). Fraction A9-1 (26.2 mg) was subjected to further silica gel column chro-matography and purified by preparative TLC to afford trans-caffeic acid (3.2 mg) and cyclo-(L-Pro-L-Tyr) (4.1 mg).
Monaspilosin (1): Colorless oil. 1H-NMR (CDCl
3, 400 MHz) and 13 C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): see Table 1. IR (Neat) cm1: 3403 (OH), 1712 (CO), 1612, 1514 (aromatic ring CC stretch). UV lmax (MeOH) nm (loge): 277 (3.42). HR-ESI-MS m/z 279.0997 [MNa] (Calcd for C16H16O3Na, 279.0995). ESI-MS m/z 279 [MNa].
Monaspiloindole (2): Colorless oil. 1H-NMR (CDCl
3, 400 MHz) and 13 C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): see Table 1. IR (Neat) cm1: 3410 (OH), 1716 (CO), 1617, 1517 (aromatic ring CC stretch). UV lmax (MeOH) nm (loge): 280 (3.74). HR-ESI-MS m/z 302.1159 [MNa] (Calcd for C18H17NO2Na, 302.1157). ESI-MS m/z 302 [MNa].
Monaspyranoindole (3): Colorless oil. 1H-NMR (CDCl
3, 400 MHz) and 13C-NMR (CDCl
3, 100 MHz): see Table 1. IR (Neat) cm1: 3320 (NH). UV lmax(MeOH) nm (loge): 288 (3.60). HR-ESI-MS m/z 224.3137 [MNa] (Calcd for C13H15NONa, 224.3139). ESI-MS m/z 224 [MNa].
Reduction of DPPH Radical After developing and drying, TLC plates were sprayed with a 0.2% DPPH (Aldrich-Sigma) solution in MeOH. The plates were examined 30 min after spraying. Compounds showing a yellow-on-purple spot were regarded as having antioxidant qualities.16)The intensity of the yellow color depends upon the amount and nature of radical scavenger present in the sample.
Determination of the Scavenging Effect on DPPH Radical The radi-cal scavenging activity of the test compounds was examined with the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) radical, as described previously.17) a-Toco-pherol (vitamin E) (Sigma) was used as control. Fifty microliters of a solu-tion containing the different compounds (final concentrasolu-tion was 50mM) to be tested was added to 5 ml of a 1.0104MMeOH solution of DPPH. The
reaction mixture was shaken vigorously, and its absorbance at 517 nm was determined after 30 min incubation in a dark area. Decreasing DPPH solu-tion absorbance indicates an increase in DPPH radical-scavenging activity. The DPPH solution, without sample solutions, was used as a control. All tests were run in triplicate and averaged. This activity is given as % DPPH radical-scavenging and is calculated in the equation: % DPPH radical-scav-enging(control absorbancesample absorbance/control absorbance)100.
Acknowledgements Support from the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan ROC, (Grant No. 94-EC-17-A-17-R7-0563) to the Food Industry Research and Development Institute (FIRDI) is appreciated.
References
1) Ma J., Li Y., Ye Q., Li J., Hua Y., Ju D., Zhang D., Cooper R., Chang M., J. Agric. Food Chem., 48, 5220—5225 (2000).
2) Tsuji K., Ichikawa T., Tanabe N., Abe S., Tarui S., Nakagawa Y.,
Nip-pon Nogeikagaku Kaishi, 66, 1241—1246 (1992).
3) Endo A., J. Antibiot., 32, 852—854 (1979). 4) Endo A., J. Med. Chem., 28, 401—405 (1985).
5) Martinokova L., Juzlova P., Vesely D., J. Appl. Bacteriol., 79, 609— 616 (1995).
6) Wong H. C., Bau Y. S., Plant Physiol., 60, 578—581 (1977). 7) Nozaki H., Date S., Kondo H., Kiyohara H., Takaoka D., Tada T.,
Nakayama M., Agric. Biol. Chem., 55, 899—900 (1991).
8) Blanc P. J., Loret M. O., Goma G., Biotechnol. Lett., 17, 291—294 (1995).
9) Juzlová P., Martinková L., Kren V., J. Industrial Microbiol., 16, 163— 170 (1996).
10) Sato K., Goda Y., Sakamoto S. S., Shibata H., Maitani T., Yamada T.,
Chem. Pharm. Bull., 45, 227—229 (1997).
11) Wild D., Tóth G., Humpf H. U., J. Agric. Food Chem., 50, 3999—4002 (2002).
12) Wild D., Tóth G., Humpf H. U., J. Agric. Food Chem., 51, 5493—5496 (2003).
13) Akihisa T., Mafune S., Ukiya M., Kimura Y., Yasukawa K., Suzuki T., Tokuda H., Tanabe N., Fukuoka T., J. Nat. Prod., 67, 479—480 (2004).
14) Jongrungruangchok S., Kittakoop P., Yongsmith B., Bavovada R., Tanasupawat S., Lartpornmatulee N., Thebtaranonth Y.,
Phytochem-istry, 65, 2569—2575 (2004).
15) Akihisa T., Tokuda H., Yasukawa K., Ukiya M., Kiyota A., Sakamoto N., Suzuki T., Tanabe N., Nishino H., J. Agric. Food Chem., 53, 562— 565 (2005).
16) Cuendet M., Hostettman K., Potterat O., Dyatmiko W., Helv. Chim.
Acta, 80, 1144—1152 (1997).
17) Hatano T., Edamatsu R., Hiramatsu M., Mori A., Fujita Y., Yasuhara T., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 37, 2016—2021 (1989).
18) Hahar L., Russell W. R., Middleton M., Shoeb M., Sarker S. D., Acta
Pharm., 55, 187—193 (2005).
19) Yamamoto Y., Kurazono M., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 17, 1626— 1628 (2007).
20) Zhang X., Li X., Lanter J. C., Sui Z., Organic Lett., 7, 2043—2046 (2005).
21) Caboni M. F., Iafelice G., Pelillo M., Marconi E., J. Agric. Food
Chem., 53, 7465—7472 (2005).
22) Cheng M. J., Tsai I. L., Chen I. S., J. Chin. Chem. Soc., 50, 1241— 1246 (2003).
23) Chiang H. C., Chu S. C., J. Chin. Chem. Soc., 38, 71—76 (1991). 24) Chang Y. C., Chang F. R., Wu Y. C., J. Chin. Chem. Soc., 47, 373—
380 (2000).
25) Chen C. Y., Wu Y. C., J. Chin. Chem. Soc., 48, 1203—1206 (2001). 26) Kuo Y. H., Lee S. M., Lai J. S., J. Chin. Chem. Soc., 47, 241—246
(2000).
27) Lee C. K., Chang M. H., J. Chin. Chem. Soc., 47, 555—560 (2000). 28) Stark T., Hofmann T., J. Agric. Food Chem., 53, 7222—7231 (2005). 29) Hearn T. W., Aust. J. Chem., 29, 107—113 (1976).
30) Bryans J. S., Chessum N. E. A., Huther N., Parsons A. F., Ghelfi F.,
Tetrahedron, 59, 6221—6232 (2003).
31) Buchanan M., Hashimoto T., Takaoka S., Asakawa Y., Phytochemistry,
40, 1251—1257 (1995).