碩士論文
分數階變革式奈米 Duffing 共振器系統的渾沌及
其同步與反控制
Chaos, Its Synchronization and Anticontrol of
Fractional Order Modified Nano Duffing
Resonator Systems
研 究 生:歐展義
指導教授:戈正銘 教授
Chaos, Its Synchronization and Anticontrol of
Fractional Order Modified Nano Duffing
Resonator Systems
研 究 生:歐展義 Student:Chan-Yi Ou
指導教授:戈正銘 Advisor:Zheng-Ming Ge
國 立 交 通 大 學
機 械 工 程 研 究 所
碩 士 論 文
A Thesis
Submitted to Department of Mechanical Engineering
College of Engineering
National Chiao Tung University
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement
for the Degree of Master of Science
in
學生:歐展義 指導教授:戈正銘
摘要
本篇論文以相圖、龐卡萊映射圖及分歧圖等數值方法研究分數階變革式奈米 Duffing 共振器系統的渾沌行為。基於頻域的觀點,零到一階之間的分數階積分器可以 線性轉移函數的近似計算而得。可以發現系統總階數 1.8、1.9、2.0、2.1 時,系統具 有渾沌現象。兩個沒有耦合的分數階變革式奈米 Duffing 共振器系統之渾沌同步可以藉 以第三渾沌系統的渾沌狀態變數之相同函數取代它們相對應的參數而達成。此方法稱為 參數激發渾沌同步。渾沌同步可成功地以很低的總分數階數 0.2 獲得,數值模擬見於相 圖、龐卡萊映射圖和狀態誤差圖。最後研究分數階變革式奈米 Duffing 共振器系統的反 控制。首先,以第二個全同的系統之狀態變數的函數作為添加項,渾沌反控制即可獲得。 接著以白噪訊、Rayleigh 噪訊、Rician 噪訊、均勻噪訊等分別作為添加項,渾沌反控 制亦可獲得。渾沌反控制可成功地以很低的總分數階數 0.2 達成。數值模擬以相圖、龐 卡萊映射圖表示。Systems
Student:Chan-Yi-Ou Advisor:Zheng-Ming-Ge
ABSTRACT
In this thesis, the chaotic behaviors in a fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system are studied numerically by phase portraits, Poincaré maps and bifurcation diagrams. Linear transfer function approximations of the fractional integrator block are calculated for a set of fractional orders in (0,1], based on frequency domain arguments. The total system orders found for chaos to exist in such systems are 1.8, 1.9, 2.0 and 2.1. The chaos synchronizations of two uncoupled fractional order chaotic modified nano Duffing resonator systems are obtained. By replacing their corresponding parameters by the same function of chaotic state variables of a third chaotic system, the chaos synchronization can be obtained. The method is named parameter excited chaos synchronization which can be successfully obtained for very low total fractional order 0.2. Numerical simulations are illustrated by phase portrait, Poincaré map and state error plots. Anti-control of chaos of a fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system is studied. First, by using the functions of state variable of a second identical system as the added term, the anti-control of chaos can be obtained. Second, by using the white noise, Rayleigh noise, Rician noise and uniform noise as
此篇論文及碩士學業之完成,首先感謝指導教授 戈正銘老師的耐心指導及諄諄教 誨。老師在讀書、人生、真理方面的經驗是令學生敬佩的,無論是兩個金字塔、特定人 誕生之機率、剃刀原則等等皆讓我受益無窮;而老師的博學也令學生見識到大師的風 采,特別是詩詞方面令學生體會到傳統中國文化之美。 在兩年的碩士光陰,經歷了兩場親人的死別和自身的一場車禍,在這要感謝我的同 學易昌賢、張安瑞和徐茂原在課業上的幫忙及生活上的協助;也感謝學弟李乾豪、李式 中、吳宗訓及學妹翁郁婷陪伴我度過最後一年碩士生涯。感謝我的家人,在我求學期間 能使我無後顧之憂完成我的學業,特別要感謝的是父親對我求學之路上的支持。在新竹 的兩年,要感謝女友小君在生活上的相伴及學業上的支持與鼓勵;感謝陳爸爸、陳媽媽 在生活上的照顧。
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
iiiCONTENTS
ivLIST OF FIGURES
vChapter 1
Introduction 1Chapter 2
Chaos in a Fractional Order Modified Nano Duffing Resonator System4
2.1 Fractional Derivative and Its Approximation 4 2.2 A Fractional Order Modified Nano Duffing Resonator
System
5
2.3 Simulation Results 7
Chapter 3
Chaos Synchronization of Fractional Order Modified Nano Duffing Resonator Systems with Parameters Excited by a Chaotic Signal34
3.1 Preliminaries 34
3.2 Numerical Simulations for Chaos Synchronization with Parameter Driven by a Chaotic Signal
34
Chapter 4
Anti-control of Chaos of a Fractional Order Modified Nano Duffing Resonator System47
4.1 Regular Dynamics of a Fractional Modified Nano Duffing Resonator System
47
4.2 Anti-control of Chaos 47
4.2.1 Adding the term kx1 48
4.2.2 Adding the term ksin x1 49
Chapter 5
Anti-control of Chaos of a Fractional Order Modified NanoDuffing Resonator System by Adding Noise
59
5.1 Preliminaries 59
5.2 Anti-control of Chaos by Adding Noise 59
5.2.1 Adding the white noise 59
5.2.2 Adding the Rayleigh noise 60
5.2.3 Adding the Rician noise 61
Figure 2.2 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x,(q1, q2)=(1.3,0.5).
9
Figure 2.3 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order
.
10
Figure 2.4 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation di , 1.3). 11 Figure 2.5 di , 0.1). 12 Figure 2.6
diagram for the fractional order
, 0.3).
13
Figure 2.7
diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing
re .4). 14 Figure 2.8 re .5). 15 Figure 2.9 re .6). 16 Figure 2.10 17
modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x,(q1, q2)=(0.3,1.5)
agram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (0.5
The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation agram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (1.8
The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation
modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (1.6
The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation
sonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (1.5, 0
The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing
sonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (1.4, 0
The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing
sonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (1.3, 0
Figure 2.12 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing
resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (0.3, 1.6).
19
Figure 2.13 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order
.
20
Figure 2.14 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation di 21 Figure 2.15 di , 1.3). 22 Figure 2.16 di , 1.1). 23 Figure 2.17 di , 0.1). 24 Figure 2.18 di , 0.2). 25 Figure 2.19 di , 0.8). 26
modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (0.4, 1.5)
agram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing
resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (0.5, 1.4). The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation agram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (0.6
The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation agram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (0.8
The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation agram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (1.9
The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation agram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (1.8
The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation agram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (1.2
diagram for the fractional order
. Figure 2.23
diagram for the fractional order
, 1.1).
30
Figure 2.24
diagram for the fractional order
.
31
Figure 2.25
diagram for the fractional order
, 1.9).
32
Figure 2.26
diagram for the fractional order
, 1.2).
33
Figure 3.1
fractional order modified
modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (0.8, 1.2)
The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation
modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (0.9
The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation
modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (1.2, 0.9)
The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation
modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (0.2
The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation
modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (0.9
The phase portrait and Poincaré map of the synchronized
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.9 for Case 1.
The time histories of the errors of the states e
37
Figure 3.2
synchroniz
of th
ed fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator
systems (11) and (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.9 for Case 1. The phase portrait
37
Figure 3.3 d Poincaré map of the synchronized
fractional order modified an
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1= q2 =0.1 for Case 1.
fractional order mod nano Duffing resonator systems (11) an
ified
d (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.9 for Case 2.
The time histories of the errors of the states of the synchronized fractional order modified
Figure 3.6
nano Duffing resonator
systems (11) and (12) with orderq1 = q2 =0.9 for Case 2. The phase portrait and Poincaré map of the synchronized fractional order mod
39
Figure 3.7
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) an
ified
d (12) with order q1= q2 =0.1 for Case 2.
The time histories of the errors of the states of the synchronized fractional order modified
40
Figure 3.8
nano Duffing resonator
systems (11) and (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.1 for Case 2. The phase portrait and Poincaré map of the synchronized fractional order mod
40
Figure 3.9
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) an
ified
d (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.9 for Case 3.
The time histories of the errors of the states of the synchronized fractional order mo
41
Figure 3.10
nano Duffing resonator
sy
dified
stems (11) and (12) with orderq1 = q2 =0.9 for Case 3. The phase portrait and Poincaré map of the synchronized fractional order modified
41
Figure 3.11
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.1 for Case 3.
The time histories of the errors of the states of the synchronized fractional order mo
42
Figure 3.12
nano Duffing resonator
sy
dified
stems (11) and (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.1 for Case 3. The phase portrait and Poincaré map of the synchronized
42
fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.1 for Case 4.
The time histories of the error s of the Figure 3.16
synchroniz
s of the state
ed fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator
systems (11) and (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.1 for Case 4. The phase portrait
44
Figure 3.17 d Poincaré map of the synchronized
fractional order modified an
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.9 for Case 5.
The time histories of the errors of the
45
Figure 3.18
synchroniz
of the states
ed fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator
systems (11) and (12) with orderq1 = q2 =0.9 for Case 5. The phase portrait
45
Figure 3.19 d Poincaré map of the synchronized
fractional order modified an
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.1 for Case 5.
The time histories of the error s of the
46
Figure 3.20
synchroniz
s of the state
ed fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator
systems (11) and (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.1 for Case 5. The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of th
46
Figure 4.1 e fractional order
modified
50
Figure 4.2 maps of the fractional order
m
51
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) without control term.
The phase portraits and Poincaré
odified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term 1
1x
ified na fing resonator systems (11) with control term 2
k
Figure 4.5 maps of the fractional order
modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term 2
k
mod no Duf
1
x , wherek2 =10.
The phase portraits and Poincaré
1
x , wherek2 =−10.
54
Figure 4.6 maps of the fractional order
modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term
k
The phase portraits and Poincaré
1
3sin x , wherek3 =10.
55
Figure 4.7 maps of the fractional order
modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term
k
The phase portraits and Poincaré
1
3sin x , wherek3 =−10.
56
Figure 4.8 maps of the fractional order
modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term
k
The phase portraits and Poincaré
1
4sin x , wherek4 =10.
57
Figure 4.9 maps of the fractional order
modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term
k
The phase portraits and Poincaré
1
4sin x , wherek4 =−10.
58
Figure 5.1 maps of the fractional order
modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term
k
63
Figure 5.2 maps of the fractional order
modified
The phase portraits and Poincaré
1
1F , wherek1 =10,F is the white noise. 1 The phase portraits and Poincaré
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term 1
1F
k , wherek1 =−10,F is the white noise. 1
modified
Figure 5.6 the fractional order
modified
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term 3
3F
k , wherek3 =10,F is Rician noise. 3
e phase s d Poincaré maps of Th portrait an
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term 3
3F
k , wherek3 =−10,F is Rician noise. 3
e phase it and Poincaré map
68
Figure 5.7 s of the fractional order
modified
69
Figure 5.8 of the fractional order
modified
Th portra s
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term 4
4F
k , wherek4 =10,F is the uniform noise. 4
e phase s d Poincaré maps Th portrait an
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term 4
4F
k , wherek4 =−10,F is the uniform noise. 4
Fractional calculus is a 300-year-old mathematical topic [1-4]. Although it has a long history, the applications of fractional calculus to physics and engineering are just a recent focus of interest. Many systems are known to display fractional order dynamics, such as viscoelastic systems, dielectric polarization [5], electrode electrolyte polarization [6], and electromagnetic waves [7]. More recently, many investigations are devoted to the control [8-12] and dynamics [13-26] of fractional order dynamical systems. In [13], it is shown that the fractional order Chua’s circuit of order as low as 2.7 can produce a chaotic attractor. In [14], it is shown that nonautonomous Duffing systems of order less than 2 can still behave in a chaotic manner. In [15], chaotic behaviors of the fractional order “jerk” model is studied, in which chaotic attractor can be obtained with the system order as low as 2.1, and in [16] chaos control of this fractional order chaotic system is investigated. In [17], the fractional order Wien bridge oscillator is studied, where it is shown that limit cycle can be generated for any fractional order, with a proper value of the amplifier gain.
Since the pioneering work by Pecora and Carroll [28], various effective methods for chaos synchronization have been reported [29-63]. However, most of synchronizations can only be realized under the hypotheses that there exists coupling between two chaotic systems. In practice, such as in physical and electrical systems, sometimes it is difficult even impossible to couple two chaotic systems. In comparison with coupled chaotic systems, for synchronization between the uncoupled chaotic systems, there are many advantages [35, 36]. In this thesis, synchronization of two fractional nano Duffing resonator systems whose corresponding parameters are excited by a chaotic signal of a third system is studied.
For continuous time systems, how to design a simple controller that can drive the system from nonchaotic to chaotic, and how to prove that such a controlled system is
approach is applied to study the behaviors of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator equations in this thesis. We use the approximate linear transfer functions for the fractional integrator of order that varies from 0.1 to 0.9, and study the resulting behavior of the entire system for each case under the effect of different types of nonlinearities. Chaotic behaviors in the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator equations are studied by phase portraits, Poincaré maps and bifurcation diagrams. It is found that the total system orders for chaos to exist in such systems are 1.8, 1.9, 2.0 and 2.1.
The chaos synchronizations of two uncoupled fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems are obtained by replacing their corresponding parameters by the same function of chaotic state variables of a third chaotic system. The method is named parameter excited chaos synchronization which can be successfully obtained for very low total fractional order 0.2. Numerical simulations are illustrated by phase portraits, Poincaré maps and state error plots.
Anti-control of chaos of a fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system is studied. By using the functions of state variable of a second identical system as the added term, the anti-control of chaos can be obtained. By using the white noise, Rayleigh noise, Rician noise and uniform noise as the added term respectively, the anti-control of chaos can be obtained. Anti-control of chaos can be successfully obtained for very low total fractional order 0.2. Numerical simulations are illustrated by phase portraits and Poincaré maps.
This thesis is organized as follows. Chapter 2 gives the dynamic equation of modified nano Duffing resonator system. The fractional derivative and its approximation are introduced. The system under study is described both in its integer and fractional forms. Numerical simulation results are presented.
In Chapter 3, numerical simulations of synchronization scheme based on driving the corresponding parameters of two chaotic systems by a chaotic signal of a third system are
Rician noise and uniform noise as the external term respectively are presented. In Chapter 6, conclusions are drawn.
Duffing Resonator System
In this chapter, the dynamic equation of modified nano Duffing resonator system is given. The fractional derivative and its approximation are introduced. The system under study is described both in its integer and fractional forms. Numerical simulation results are presented.
2.1 Fractional Derivative and Its Approximation
Two commonly used definitions for the general fractional differintegral are the Grunwald definition and the Riemann-Liouville definition. The Riemann-Liouville definition of the fractional integral is given here as [27]
, 0 ) ( ) ( ) ( 1 ) ( 0 − 1 < − Γ =
∫
+ d q t f q dt t f d t q q q τ τ τ (2.1)where q can have noninteger values, and thus the name fractional differintegral. Notice that the definition is based on integration and more importantly is a convolution integral for q < 0. When q > 0, then the usual integer nth derivative must be taken of the fractional (q–n)th integral, and yields the fractional derivative of order q as
⎥, ⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ = −− n q n q n n q q dt f d dt d dt f d q>0 and n an integer>q (2.2)
This appears so vastly different from the usual intuitive definition of derivative and integral that the reader must abandon the familiar concepts of slope and area and attempt to get some new insight. Fortunately, the basic engineering tool for analyzing linear systems, the Laplace transform, is still applicable and works as one would expect; that is,
{ }
0 1 0 1 1 ) ( ) ( ) ( = − = −− − −∑
⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − = ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ t n k q k k q k q q q dt t f d s t f L s dt t f d L , for all q (2.3)An efficient method is to approximate fractional operators by using standard integer order operators. In [27], an effective algorithm is developed to approximate fractional order transfer functions. Basically, the idea is to approximate the system behavior in the frequency domain. By utilizing frequency domain techniques based on Bode diagrams, one can obtain a linear approximation of fractional order integrator, the order of which depends on the desired bandwidth and discrepancy between the actual and the approximate magnitude Bode diagrams. In Table 1 of [13], approximations for q
s 1 with q=0.1~0.9 in steps 0.1 are given, with errors of approximately 2dB. These approximations are used in following simulations.
2.2 A Fractional Order Modified Nano Duffing Resonator System
The famous Duffing system is t b x x x a
x&&+ &+ + 3 = cosω (2.5) where a, b are constant parameters
It can be written as two first order ordinary differential equations:
⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎨ ⎧ + − − − = = t b ay x x dt dy y dt dx ω cos 3 (2.6)
Consider the following modified nano Duffing resonator system:
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − = = + − − − = = 3 3 dw w dt dz bz ay x x dt dy y dt dx (2.7)
and ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − = = 3 dz cz dt dw w dt dz (2.9)
As a nonlinear oscillator, system (2.9) provides the periodic time function to system (2.8) as an excitation which produces the chaos in system (2.8). To sum up, system (2.8) can be considered as a nonautonomous system with two states
bz
y
x, with as an excitation which is a given periodic function of time, while system (2.8) and system (2.9) together can be considered as an autonomous system with four states
bz
w z y
x, , , . We focus on system (2.8), while system (2.9) remains an integral order system.
Now, consider a fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system. Here, the conventional derivatives in Eq.(2.8) are replaced by the fractional derivatives as follows:
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − = = + − − − = = 3 3 2 2 1 1 dz cz dt dw w dt dz bz ay x x dt y d y dt x d q q q q (2.10)
where system parameter b is allowed to be varied, and are two fractional order numbers. Simulations are then performed using
2 1, q q ) 2 , 1 (i= qi varied from 0.1~0.9, respectively. The approximations from Table 1 of [13] are used for the simulations of the appropriate th integrals. When < 1, then the approximations are used directly. It should further be noted that approximations used in the simulations for
i q qi i q s 1 , when
In this section, all numerical simulations are run by block diagrams in Simulink environment,using ode45 solver algorithm, where the fractional integrators have been approximated by linear time invariant transfer functions following the procedure in [13]. In so far as the attractor shape is concerned, both procedures gave very similar results. In numerical simulations, three parameters a =0.05, c =1 and d=0.3 are fixed and is varied. The initial states of the modified Duffing system are ,
b 0 ) 0 ( = x y(0)=0, and . 10 ) 0 ( = z w(0)=10
Firstly, when the total order q1+q2is 1.8, chaos is found in the cases: ( ) = (1.5, 0.3), ( ) = (1.3, 0.5), ( ) = (0.3, 1.5), and ( ) = (0.5, 1.3). The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagrams are showed in Fig.2.1~Fig.2.4. Secondly, when the total order
2 1, q q 2 1, q q q1, q2 q1, q2 2 1 q
q + is 1.9, chaos is found in the cases: ( ) = (1.8, 0.1), ( ) = (1.6, 0.3), ( ) = (1.5, 0.4), ( ) = (1.4, 0.5), ( ) = (1.3, 0.6), ( ) = (1.1, 0.8), ( ) = (0.1, 1.8), ( ) = (0.3, 1.6), ( ) = (0.4, 1.5), ( ) = (0.5, 1.4), ( ) = (0.6, 1.3), and ( ) = (0.8, 1.1) The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagrams are shown in Fig.2.5~Fig.2.16. When the total order is 2.0, chaos is found in the cases: ( ) = (1.9, 0.1), ( ) = (1.8, 0.2), ( ) = (1.2, 0.8), ( ) = (1.1, 0.9), ( ) = (0.2, 1.8), ( ) = (0.8, 1.2), and ( ) = (0.9, 1.1). The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagrams are shown in Fig.2.17~Fig.2.23. Finally, when the total order
2 1, q q 2 1, q q q1, q2 q1, q2 q1, q2 2 1, q q q1, q2 q1, q2 q1, q2 q1, q2 2 1, q q q1, q2 2 1 q q + q1, q2 q1, q2 2 1, q q q1, q2 q1, q2 q1, q2 2 1, q q 2 1 q q + is 2.1, chaos is found in the cases: ( ) = (1.2, 0.9), ( ) = (0.2, 1.9), and ( ) = (1.2, 0.9). The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagrams are showed in Fig.2.24~Fig.2.26. It can be seen that when is larger, the range of y state is also larger.
2 1, q
q q1, q2 q1, q2
1
x x
(a) (b) Period 5, b=191.6 Period 5, b=191.8
y x (c) Chaos, b=196 x b (d)
Fig. 2.1 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x,(q1, q2)=(1.5,0.3).
x x
(a) (b) Period 5, b=195 Period 5, b=199
y x (c) Chaos, b=191 x b (d)
x x
(a) (b) Period 2, b=201 Period 5, b=202
y x (c) Chaos, b=206 x b (d)
Fig. 2.3 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x,(q1, q2)=(0.3,1.5).
x x
(a) (b) Period 2, b=200.9 Period 2, b=201.2
y x (c) Chaos, b=206 x b (d)
x x
(a) (b) Period 4, b=66 Period 6, b=68.1
y x (c) Chaos, b=63 x b (d)
Fig. 2.5 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (1.8, 0.1).
x x
(a) (b) Period 2, b=60.5 Period 4, b=61
y x (c) Chaos, b=65 x b (d)
x x
(a) (b) Period 2, b=47.1 Period 4, b=47.5
y x (c) Chaos, b=42 x b (d)
Fig. 2.7 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (1.5, 0.4).
x x
(a) (b) Period 2, b=48 Period 4, b=47.1
y x (c) Chaos, b=42 x b (d)
x x
(a) (b) Period 2, b=50.5 Period 4 , b=59.9
y x (c) Chaos, b=55 x b (d)
Fig. 2.9 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (1.3, 0.6).
x x
(a) (b) Period 4, b=62 Period 5, b=64.9
y x (c) Chaos, b=67 x b (d)
x x
(a) (b) Period 3, b=60.5 Period 4, b=62
y x (c) Chaos, b=66 x b (d)
Fig. 2.11 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (0.1, 1.8).
x x
(a) (b) Period 4, b=40.4 Period 5, b=47.2
y x (c) Chaos, b=44 x b (d)
x x
(a) (b) Period 5, b=42.2 Period 5, b=44
y x (c) Chaos, b=48.2 x b (d)
Fig. 2.13 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (0.4, 1.5).
x x
(a) (b) Period 5, b=42.2 Period 5, b=44
y x (c) Chaos, b=45.8 x b (d)
x x
(a) (b) Period 2, b=40.4 Period 4, b=45.2
y x (c) Chaos, b=44 x b (d)
Fig. 2.15 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (0.6, 1.3).
x x
(a) (b) Period 3, b=63 Period 4, b=64.7
y x (c) Chaos, b=66 x b (d)
x x
(a) (b) Period 1, b=38.5 Period 2, b=35
y x (c) Chaos, b=37 x b (d)
Fig. 2.17 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (1.9, 0.1).
x x
(a) (b) Period 2, b=128.1 Period 2, b=129.05
y x (c) Chaos, b=125 x b (d)
x x
(a) (b) Period 5, b=125 Period 6, b=129
y x (c) Chaos, b=123 x b (d)
Fig. 2.19 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (1.2, 0.8).
x x
(a) (b) Period 3, b=72.8 Period 5, b=78.01
y x (c) Chaos, b=79 x b (d)
x x
(a) (b) Period 4, b=124 Period 6, b=121
y x (c) Chaos, b=126 x b (d)
Fig. 2.21 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (0.2, 1.8).
x x
(a) (b) Period 4, b=124 Period 5, b=127.2
y x (c) Chaos, b=121 x b (d)
x x
(a) (b) Period 4, b=68 Period 5, b=63
y x (c) Chaos, b=69 x b (d)
Fig. 2.23 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (0.9, 1.1).
x x
(a) (b) Period 2, b=68.9 Period 5, b=64
y x (c) Chaos, b=62 x b (d)
x x
(a) (b) Period 2, b=72 Period 5, b=78.8
y x (c) Chaos, b=79 x b (d)
Fig. 2.25 The phase portraits, Poincaré maps and the bifurcation diagram for the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system, x versus y and b versus x, (q1, q2) = (0.2, 1.9).
x x
(a) (b) Period 2, b=70.1 Period 5, b=78.5
y x (c) Chaos, b=74 x b (d)
Modified Nano Duffing Resonator Systems with
Parameters Excited by a Chaotic Signal
3.1 Preliminaries
The chaos synchronizations of two uncoupled fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems are obtained by replacing their corresponding parameters by the same function of chaotic state variables of a third chaotic system in this chapter. The method is named parameter excited chaos synchronization which can be successfully obtained for very low total fractional order 0.2.
3.2
Numerical Simulations for Chaos Synchronization with
Parameter Driven by a Chaotic Signal
In this section, two chaotic fractional order modified nano Duffing resontor systems ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − = = + − − − = = 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 dz cz dt dw w dt dz bz ay x x dt y d y dt x d q q q q (3.1) and
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎨ − − = = + − − − = 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 dz cz dt dw w dt dz bz ay x x dtq (3.2)
where and are the fractional orders, are synchronized by replacing corresponding parameters by the same function of chaotic states of chaotic modified nano Duffing resontor system
1 q q2 ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − = = + − − − = = 3 3 dz cz dt dw w dt dz bz ay x x dt dy y dt dx (3.3)
where a = 0.05, b= 53, c = 1, and d = 0.3 are constant parameters of the system. Define the error states as e1 =x1−x2 and e2 = y1 −y2 in system (3.1) and (3.2). The synchronization scheme is to replace the corresponding parameters b in system (3.1) and (3.2) by the same function of chaotic states of system (3.3) such that
0 ) (t →
e as t →∞. In following simulations, for various derivative orders and
, we replace the system parameter b in system (3.1) and (3.2) by x, y, , , xy where x and y are state variables in system (3.3). Simulations are performed under
in steps of 0.1. In our numerical simulations, four
1 q 2 q x2 y2 9 . 0 ~ 1 . 0 2 1 = q = q = = = =
are successfully obtained. For saving space, only results for q1 =q2= 0.1 and 0.9 are
shown in Fig. 3.1 ~ 3.4.
Case 2: The parametersa=0.05, c=1 and d =0.3 of system (3.1) and (3.2) are fixed. The parameter b of system (3.1) and (3.2) is replaced by the same y, where y is the state variable of system (3.3). All synchronizations for
are successfully obtained. For saving space, only results for
9 . 0 ~ 1 . 0 2 1 = q = q 2 1 q q = = 0.1 and 0.9 are shown in Fig. 3.5 ~3.8.
Case 3: The parameters a=0.05, c=1 and d =0.3 of system (3.1) and (3.2) are fixed. The parameter b of system (3.1) and (3.2) is replaced by the same , where x is the state variable of system (3.3). All synchronizations for
are successfully obtained. For saving space, only results for
2 x 9 . 0 ~ 1 . 0 2 1 = q = q 2 1 q q = = 0.1 and 0.9 are shown in Fig. 3.9 ~ 3.12.
Case 4: The parameters a=0.05, c=1 and d =0.3 of system (3.1) and (3.2) are fixed. The parameter b of system (3.1) and (3.2) is replaced by the same , where y is the state variable of system (3.3). All synchronizations for
are successfully obtained. For saving space, only results for
2 y 9 . 0 ~ 1 . 0 2 1 = q = q 2 1 q q = = 0.1 and 0.9 are shown in Fig. 3.13 ~ 3.16.
Case 5: The parameters a=0.05, c=1 and d =0.3 of system (3.1) and (3.2) are fixed. The parameter b of system (3.1) and (3.2) is replaced by the same xy, where x and y are the state variables of system (3.3). All synchronizations for
are successfully obtained. For saving space, only results for 9 . 0 ~ 1 . 0 = = q q
1
y
1
x
Fig. 3.1 The phase portrait and Poincaré map of the synchronized fractional order modified
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1= q2 =0.9 for Case 1.
1
e
t
2
1
x
Fig. 3.3 The phase portrait and Poincaré map of the synchronized fractional order modified
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.1 for Case 1.
1 e t 2 e t
Fig. 3.4 The time histories of the errors of the states of the synchronized fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.1 for Case 1.
1
x
Fig. 3.5 The phase portrait and Poincaré map of the synchronized fractional order modified
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1= q2 =0.9 for Case 2.
1 e t 2 e t
1
x
Fig. 3.7 The phase portrait and Poincaré map of the synchronized fractional order modified
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.1 for Case 2.
1 e t 2 e t
Fig. 3.8 The time histories of the errors of the states of the synchronized fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.1 for Case 2.
1
x
Fig. 3.9 The phase portrait and Poincaré map of the synchronized fractional order modified
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1= q2 =0.9 for Case 3.
1 e t 2 e t
1
x
Fig. 3.11 The phase portrait and Poincaré map of the synchronized fractional order modified
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1= q2 =0.1 for Case 3.
1 e t 2 e t
Fig. 3.12 The time histories of the errors of the states of the synchronized fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.1 for Case 3.
1
x
Fig. 3.13 The phase portrait and Poincaré map of the synchronized fractional order modified
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1= q2 =0.9 for Case 4.
1 e t 2 e t
1
x
Fig. 3.15 The phase portrait and Poincaré map of the synchronized fractional order modified
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1= q2 =0.1 for Case 4.
1 e t 2 e t
Fig. 3.16 The time histories of the errors of the states of the synchronized fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.1 for Case 4.
1
x
Fig. 3.17 The phase portrait and Poincaré map of the synchronized fractional order modified
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1= q2 =0.9 for Case 5.
1 e t 2 e t
1
x
Fig. 3.19 The phase portrait and Poincaré map of the synchronized fractional order modified
nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1= q2 =0.1 for Case 5.
1 e t 2 e t
Fig. 3.20 The time histories of the errors of the states of the synchronized fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) and (12) with order q1 = q2 =0.1 for Case 5.
Modified Nano Duffing Resonator System
In this chapter, anti-control of chaos is applied by adding various external terms. By using the functions of state variables of a second system as the external terms, the anti-control of chaos can be obtained. Anti-control of chaos can be successfully obtained for very low total fractional order 0.2.4.1 Regular Dynamics of a Fractional Modified Nano Duffing Resonator System In this section, consider the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − = = + − − − = = 3 3 2 2 1 1 dz cz dt dw w dt dz bz ay x x dt y d y dt x d q q q q (4.1)
where a=0.05, b=10, c=1 and d=0.3, and are the fractional orders, and the initial condition is , 1 q q2 0 ) 0 ( =
x y(0)=0,z(0)=10andw(0)=10. It can be obtained that the motion is periodic forq1 = q2 =0.1~0.9. For saving space, only results for
=0.1, 0.5 and 0.9 are shown in Fig.4.1.
2
1 q
Now, consider a second identical modified nano Duffing resonator system: ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − = = + − − − = = 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 dz cz dt dw w dt dz bz ay x x dt dy y dt dx (4.2)
where a = 0.05, b= 10, c = 1, and d = 0.3 are constant parameters of the system, and the initial condition is x1(0)=3,y1(0)=4,z1(0)=1andw1(0)=0.
In order to induce chaotic phenomena of the fractional modified nano Duffing resonator system (4.1), and are added to system (4.1) respectively, where k is a constant.
1
kx ksin x1
4.2.1 Adding the term kx1
First, we add an external term to the first equation of (4.1). Second, we add an external term to the second equation of (4.1). The strengths and are either positive or negative. For anti-control of chaos all simulations for
are obtained successfully. For saving space, only results for =0.1, 0.5 and 0.9 are shown as Fig. 4.2-4.5. It can be seen that when total order is larger, the range of y state is also larger.
1 1x k 1 2x k k1 k2 9 . 0 ~ 1 . 0 2 1 = q = q 2 1 q q =
From above numerical results, it is shown that whether and are either positive or negative, the chaotization effects are similar.
1
add an external term to the second equation of (4.1). The strengths and are either positive or negative. For anti-control of chaos all simulations for are obtained successfully. For saving space, only results for =0.1, 0.5 and 0.9 are shown as Fig. 4.6-4.9.
1 4sin x k k3 4 k 9 . 0 ~ 1 . 0 2 1 = q = q 2 1 q q =
From above numerical results, it is also shown that whether and are positive or negative, the chaotization effects are similar. It can be seen that when total order is larger, the range of y state is also larger.
3
(a) q1 = q2 =0.1 (b) q1 = q2 =0.5
(c) q1 = q2 =0.9
Fig. 4.1 The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) without control term.
(a) q1 = q2 =0.1 (b) q1 = q2 =0.5
(c) q1 = q2 =0.9
Fig. 4.2 The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term k1x1, wherek1 =10.
(a) q1 = q2 =0.1 (b) q1 = q2 =0.5
(c) q1 = q2 =0.9
Fig. 4.3 The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term k1x1, wherek1 =−10.
(a) q1 = q2 =0.1 (b) q1 = q2 =0.5
(c) q1 = q2 =0.9
Fig. 4.4 The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term k2x1, wherek2 =10.
(a) q1 = q2 =0.1 (b) q1 = q2 =0.5
(c) q1 = q2 =0.9
Fig. 4.5 The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term k2x1, wherek2 =−10.
(a) q1 = q2 =0.1 (b) q1 = q2 =0.5
(c) q1 = q2 =0.9
Fig. 4.6 The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term k3sin x1, wherek3 =10.
(a) q1 = q2 =0.1 (b) q1 = q2 =0.5
(c) q1 = q2 =0.9
Fig. 4.7 The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term k3sin x1, wherek3 =−10.
(a) q1 = q2 =0.1 (b) q1 = q2 =0.5
(c) q1 = q2 =0.9
Fig. 4.8 The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term k4sin x1, wherek4 =10.
(a) q1 = q2 =0.1 (b) q1 = q2 =0.5
(c) q1 = q2 =0.9
Fig. 4.9 The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term k4sin x1, wherek4 =−10.
Chapter 5
Anti-control of Chaos of a Fractional Order
Modified Nano Duffing Resonator System by
Adding Noise
5.1 PreliminariesIn this chapter, anti-control of chaos of a fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system is studied by adding noise. By using the white noise, Rayleigh noise, Rician noise and uniform noise as the added term respectively, the anti-control of chaos can be obtained. Anti-control of chaos can be successfully obtained for very low total fractional order 0.2.
5.2 Anti-control of Chaos by Adding Noise
In this section, addition of the white noise, Rayleigh noise, Rician noise and uniform noise as the external term respectively are presented, which can enhance the existing chaos of the originally system. All numerical simulations are run by block diagrams in Simulink environment. The results are demonstrated by numerical results, i.e. phase portraits and Poincaré maps.
Communications toolbox provides the Gaussian Noise Generator block. The initial seed, the mean value and the variance in the simulation must be specified. We take the initial seed 41, the mean value 1 and the variance 1 in the simulation.
For anti-control of chaos, all simulations for q1 = q2 =0.1~0.9 are obtained successfully. For saving space, only results for q1=q2=0.1, 0.5 and 0.9 are shown as Fig. 5.1-5.2.
From above numerical results, it is shown that when is either positive or negative, the chaotic phase portraits are almost symmetric to the origin. It can be seen that when total order is larger, the range of y state is also larger.
1
k
5.2.2 Adding the Rayleigh noise
We add an external term to the second equation of (4.1), where is Rayleigh noise. The strength is either positive or negative.
2 2F
k F2
2
k
The Rayleigh probability density function is given by
⎪ ⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ < ≥ = − 0 0 0 ) ( 2 2 2 2 x x e x x f x σ σ (5.2)
where is known as the fading envelope of the Rayleigh distribution. The Simulink Communications toolbox provides the Rayleigh Noise Generator block. The initial seed and the sigma parameter in the simulation must be specified. We specify the initial seed 47 and the sigma parameter 5 in the simulation.
2
negative, the chaotic phase portraits are almost symmetric to the origin. It can be seen that when total order is larger, the range of y state is also larger.
5.2.3 Adding the Rician noise
We add an external term to the second equation of (4.1), where is
Rician noise. The strength is either positive or negative.
3 3F
k F3
3
k
The Rician probability density function is given by
⎪ ⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ < ≥ = + − 0 0 0 ) ( ) ( 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 x x e mx I x x f m x σ σ σ (5.3)
where σ is the standard deviation of the Gaussian distribution that underlies the Rician distribution noise, , where and are the mean values
of two independent Gaussian components, and is the modified 0th-order Bessel function of the first kind given by
2 2 2 Q I m m m = + mI mQ 0 I
∫
− = π π π e dt y I0 y cost 2 1 ) ( (5.4)Note that m and σ are not the mean value and standard deviation for the Rician noise. The Simulink Communications toolbox provides the Rician Noise Generator block. The initial seed, Rician K-factor and the sigma parameter must be specified in the simulation. We specify the initial seed 59, Rician K-factor 10 and the sigma
that when total order is larger, the range of y state is also larger.
5.2.4 Adding the Uniform noise
We add an external term to the second equation of (4.1), where is the uniform noise. The strength is either positive or negative.
4 4F
k F4
4
k
The probability density function of uniform noise is given by
⎪⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ ≤ ≤ − = otherwise b x a if a b x f 0 1 ) ( (5.5)
The mean of this density function is given by
2 b a+ =
µ and its variance by
12 )
( 2
2 = b−a
σ .
The Simulink Communications toolbox provides the Uniform Noise Generator block. The initial seed, the noise lower bound and the noise upper bound must be specified in the simulation. We specify the initial seed 31, the noise lower bound 0 and the noise upper bound 5 in the simulation.
For anti-control of chaos, all simulations for q1 = q2 =0.1~0.9 are obtained successfully. For saving space, only results for q1=q2=0.1, 0.5 and 0.9 are shown as Fig. 5.7-5.8.
From above numerical results, it is shown that when is either positive or negative, the chaotic phase portraits are almost symmetric to the origin. It can be seen that when total order is larger, the range of y state is also larger.
4
(a) q1 = q2 =0.1 (b) q1 = q2 =0.5
(c) q1 = q2 =0.9
Fig. 5.1 The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term k1F1, wherek1 =10,F1 is the white noise.
(a) q1 = q2 =0.1 (b) q1 = q2 =0.5
(c) q1 = q2 =0.9
Fig. 5.2 The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term k1F1, wherek1 =−10,F1 is the white noise.
(a) q1 = q2 =0.1 (b) q1 = q2 =0.5
(c) q1 = q2 =0.9
Fig. 5.3 The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term k2F2, wherek2 =10,F2 is Rayleigh noise.
(a) q1 = q2 =0.1 (b) q1 = q2 =0.5
(c) q1 = q2 =0.9
Fig. 5.4 The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term k2F2, wherek2 =−10,F2 is Rayleigh noise.
(a) q1 = q2 =0.1 (b) q1 = q2 =0.5
(c) q1 = q2 =0.9
Fig. 5.5 The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term k3F3, wherek3 =10,F3 is Rician noise.
(a) q1 = q2 =0.1 (b) q1 = q2 =0.5
(c) q1 = q2 =0.9
Fig. 5.6 The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term k3F3, wherek3 =−10,F3 is Rician noise.
(a) q1 = q2 =0.1 (b) q1 = q2 =0.5
(c) q1 = q2 =0.9
Fig. 5.7 The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term k4F4, wherek4 =10,F4 is the uniform noise.
(a) q1 = q2 =0.1 (b) q1 = q2 =0.5
(c) q1 = q2 =0.9
Fig. 5.8 The phase portraits and Poincaré maps of the fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems (11) with control term k4F4, wherek4 =−10,F4 is the uniform noise.
Conclusions
In this thesis we have studied the chaos in the fractional order modified nano Duffing resontor system by phase portraits, Poincaré maps and bifurcation diagrams in Chapter 2.The total orders of the system for the existence of chaos are 1.8, 1.9, 2.0 and 2.1.
In Chapter 3, The chaos synchronizations of two uncoupled fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator systems are obtained by replacing their corresponding parameters by the same function of chaotic state variables of a third chaotic system. The method is named parameter excited chaos synchronization which can be successfully obtained for very low total fractional order 0.2. Numerical simulations are illustrated by phase portraits, Poincaré maps and state error plots.
In Chapter 4 and 5, anti-control of chaos of a fractional order modified nano Duffing resonator system is studied. By using the functions of state variable of a second identical system as the added term, the anti-control of chaos can be obtained. By using the white noise, Rayleigh noise, Rician noise and uniform noise as the added term respectively, the anti-control of chaos can be obtained. Anti-control of chaos can be successfully obtained for very low total fractional order 0.2. Numerical simulations are illustrated by phase portraits and Poincaré maps.
Solitons and Fractals 2005;26:867-79.
[2] Yao, K.; Su, W.Y.; Zhou, S.P.,“On the connection between the order of fractional calculus and the dimensions of a fractal function”. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 2005;23: 621-9.
[3] Guy, Jumarie, “Fractional master equation: non-standard analysis and Liouville–Riemann derivative”. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 2001;12: 2577-87. [4] Elwakil, S. A.; Zahran, M. A., “Fractional Integral Representation of Master
Equation”. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 1999;10: 1545-8.
[5] Sun, H.H., Abdelwahad A.A., Onaral B., IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1984;29: 441.
[6] Ichise, M., Nagayanagi ,Y., Kojima, T., Electroanal J., Chem. 1971;33:253. [7] Heaviside, O., Electromagnetic Theory, Chelsea, New York, 1971.
[8] Oustaloup, A., Levron, F., Nanot, F., Mathieu, B., “Frequency band complex non integer differentiator: characterization and synthesis”. IEEE Trans CAS-I 2000;47:25–40.
[9] Chen, Y.Q., Moore, K., “Discretization schemes for fractional-order differentiators and integrators”. IEEE Trans CAS-I2002;49:363–7.
[10] Hartley, T.T., Lorenzo, C.F.,“Dynamics and control of initialized fractional-order systems”. Nonlinear Dyn 2002;29:201–33.