• 沒有找到結果。

Statistical Methods for Biotechnology Products

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Statistical Methods for Biotechnology Products"

Copied!
34
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

Statistical Methods for

Statistical Methods for

Biotechnology Products

Biotechnology Products

Jen-pei Liu, Ph.D., Professor

Division of Biometry, Department of Agronomy

National Taiwan University

and

(2)

110/07/16 Copyright by Jen-pei Liu, PhD; Pr oduct Names for Illustration only and not for endorsement

2

Materials

Materials

1. CGMP

Current Good Manufacturing Practice

2. USP/NF

The United States Pharmacopeia XXII and National

Formulary

3. Text book

Chow, S.C. and Liu, J.P.(1995). Statistical Design and

Analysis in Pharmaceutical Science. Marcel Dekker, Inc.,

(3)

4. Some References

Simon et al (2003) Design and Analysis in DNA Microarray Investigations.

Springer.

Liu, J.P. and Chow, S.C.(1995). Statistics methods for quality assurance of

drug products. J. Chinese Stat. Assoc., 33, 169-186.

Ju, H.L. and Chow, S.C.(1995). On stability designs in drug shelf-life esti

mation, J. Biopharm. Stat., 5, 201-214.

Liu, J.P., Tung, S.C., and Pong, Y.M. (2005) An alternative approach to ev

aluation of poolability of stability studies, accepted by J. Biopharm. Stat.

Lesko, L. and Woodcock, J. (2004) Translation of pharmacogenomics and

pharmacogenetics: a regulatory perspective, Nature Reviews Drug Discove

Materials

(4)

110/07/16 Copyright by Jen-pei Liu, PhD; Pr oduct Names for Illustration only and not for endorsement

4

Shi, L., et al (2004) QA/QC: challenges and pitfalls facing the microarray co

mmunity and regulatory agencies, Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 4, 761-777.

Dobbin, K.K., et al. (2005) Interlaboratory comparability study of cancer gen

e expression analysis using olignonucleotide, Clinical Cancer Research, 11,

565-572.

Michiels S., Koscielny S., and Hill C. (2005) Prediction of cancer outcome w

ith microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy, Lancet, 365, 488-492

.

Ioannidis J.P.A. (2005) Microarrays and molecular research: noise discovery

, Lancet, 365, 454-455.

Materials

(5)

Members of the Toxicogenomics research Consortium (2005)

Standardizing global gene expression analysis between labora

tories and across platforms, Nature Methods, 2, 351-356.

Irizarry R.A., Warren D., Spencer F., Kim I.F., Biswal S., Fra

nk B.C. et al. (2005) Multi-laboratory comparison of microarr

ay platforms, Nature Methods, 2, 345-349.

Larkin J.E., Frank B.C., Gavras H., Sultana R., and Quackenb

ush J. (2005) Independence and reproducilbility across microa

rray platforms, Nature Methods, 2, 337-343.

Materials

(6)

110/07/16 Copyright by Jen-pei Liu, PhD; Pr oduct Names for Illustration only and not for endorsement

6

Introduction

Introduction

Part I: Biopharmaceutical Products

Lecture 1: Principles

Lecture 2: Review of Statistical Process Control

Lecture 3: USP tests and Specifications

Lecture 4: Regulatory Requirements for Drug Stability

Lecture 5: Accelerated Testing

Lecture 6: Statistical Designs of Stability Studies

Lecture 7: Statistical Analysis of Stability Data

(7)

Introduction

Introduction

Part II: Biochip Diagnostic Products

Lecture 8: Overview of Biochips and Microarray Techn

ology

Lecture 9: Issues of Biochip Products Based on Microa

rray Technology

Lecture 10: Evaluation of Microarray Products

Lecture 11: Examples of Regulatory Evaluation of Bioc

hip Products

Lecture 12: Tests Based on Quantitative Measurements

Lecture 13: Clinical Validation and Effectiveness

(8)

110/07/16 Copyright by Jen-pei Liu, PhD; Pr oduct Names for Illustration only and not for endorsement

8

Introduction

(9)

Introduction

Introduction

Drug development

Regulatory requirement

Current issues

(10)
(11)

Regulatory Requirements

Regulatory Requirements

Legal basis

- Pure Food and Drug Act (1906)

- Sherley Amendment (1912)

- Federal, Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (1938)

- Kefauver-Harris Amendment(1962)

- NDA Rewrite (1985)

- Treatment IND (1987)

- Parallel Track And Accelerated Approval (1992)

- U.S. FDA Modernization Act (1997)

(12)

110/07/16 Copyright by Jen-pei Liu, PhD; Pr oduct Names for Illustration only and not for endorsement

12

Regulatory Requirements

Regulatory Requirements

Objectives

- Efficacy & safety

- Identity, strength, quality and purity

FDA regulations

- CFR(Codes of Federal Regulations)

- cGMP (Current Good Manufacturing Practice)

- USP/NF (United States Pharmacopeia/ National Formulary)

- FDA guidances and guidelines

- ICH guidances

Continued

(13)
(14)

110/07/16 Copyright by Jen-pei Liu, PhD; Pr oduct Names for Illustration only and not for endorsement

14

Current Good Manufacturing Practice

Current Good Manufacturing Practice

Organization and Personnel

Building and Facilities

Equipment

Containers and Closures

Production and Process Controls

Holding and Distribution

Laboratory Controls

Records and Report

(15)

Current Good Manufacturing Practice

Current Good Manufacturing Practice

Quality Control Unit

- Statistical QC criteria

- Sampling and testing plan

- Acceptance and rejection levels

Representative Samples

- Variability

- Confidence levels

- Degree of precision

- Top, middle, and bottom of the container

Validation

- Accuracy and reliability

- Assay and process validation

(16)

110/07/16 Copyright by Jen-pei Liu, PhD; Pr oduct Names for Illustration only and not for endorsement

16

Current Good Manufacturing Practice

Current Good Manufacturing Practice

Process Controls

- Raw material inspection

- In-process materials testing

- Release testing

Stability Testing

- Expiration dating period

(or shelf-life)

- Sample size

(e.g., at least three primary batches)

- Test intervals

(e.g., 0, 3, 6, 9, 12,18,…)

- Storage conditions

(17)

Introduction

Introduction

1

2

i

N-1

N

Raw

Material

Finish

Product

Manufacturing Steps

i

Unit Process Step (i) with Associated Process Characteristics

Total Manufacturing Process =

1

(Unit Process Step i)

N i

(18)

110/07/16 Copyright by Jen-pei Liu, PhD; Pr oduct Names for Illustration only and not for endorsement

(19)
(20)

110/07/16 Copyright by Jen-pei Liu, PhD; Pr oduct Names for Illustration only and not for endorsement

20

(21)
(22)

110/07/16 Copyright by Jen-pei Liu, PhD; Pr oduct Names for Illustration only and not for endorsement

22

Process Controls

Process Controls

Raw Material Inspection

Random selection of drums

Random samples from the top, middle, and

bottom parts of each chosen drum

Checking the strength: uniformity – mean a

nd varibility

Combination of different strengths from diff

(23)

Process Controls

Process Controls

Example: 150-ft

3

V-blender

Objective: potency and uniformity to meet the

USP/NF specifications

Primary and final blending stage: 12 samples

from top, middle, bottom, and front and

back of the right and left sides of the

V-blender.

(24)

110/07/16 Copyright by Jen-pei Liu, PhD; Pr oduct Names for Illustration only and not for endorsement

24

Process Controls

Process Controls

Product Testing

Release Testing: Random samples from a batch

for potency, content uniformity, dissolution,

weight variation and disintegration

Release target: a target set by the manufacturer so

that (1-)% probability that the batch will meet

the USP/NF specifications.

(25)

Current Good Manufacturing Practice

Current Good Manufacturing Practice

What if a pharmaceutical company fail to comply

with current good manufacturing practice?

- Warning

- Issue a recall

- Legal action

Example

New Jersey Star Ledger, July 9, 1993

A New Jersey drug company agreed to a consent decree with the

FDA for a dispute over record keeping at its two manufacturing

plants, The settlement cost the company ay least $50 million in lost

sales in the first and second quarters of 1993.

(26)

110/07/16 Copyright by Jen-pei Liu, PhD; Pr oduct Names for Illustration only and not for endorsement

26

Current Good Manufacturing Practice

Current Good Manufacturing Practice

Example

On May 17, 2002, Schering-Plough agrees to pay US $500 million for its vio

lation of cGMP at 4 New Jersey and Puerto Rico facilities and also had to

pay US $471,500 for inspection cost. It suspended manufacturing 198 diff

erent drugs (90%).

On April 28, 2005, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) had signed a consent decree wit

h FDA to correct manufacturing deficiencies at its Cidra, Puerto Rico facil

ities. The Decree requires GSK to post a panel bond of US $650,000,000 c

ontingent upon GSK reconditioning drugs seized in March 2005 or destro

y them and pay costs to government. Paxil CR tablets for depression and

panic disorder, could split apart. One half may contain the whole active in

gredients and other half contains no active ingredient at all

(27)

USP/NF Tests

USP/NF Tests

The United States Pharmacopeia XXII and National Formulary

The compendia of legally public standards

- Safety and efficacy

- Identity, strength, quality and purity

- Packaging and labeling

Standard testing procedures

Standard sampling plans

Acceptance criteria

(28)

110/07/16 Copyright by Jen-pei Liu, PhD; Pr oduct Names for Illustration only and not for endorsement

28

USP/NF Tests

USP/NF Tests

Uniformity of Dosage Units

- Sampling plan

- Acceptance criteria

- Probability of passing

Dissolution

- Acceptance criteria

- Probability of passing

Other tests

- Potency

- Weight variation

- Disintegration

(29)
(30)

110/07/16 Copyright by Jen-pei Liu, PhD; Pr oduct Names for Illustration only and not for endorsement

30

FDA guidances and

FDA guidances and

guidelines

guidelines

Guidances

Stability

“Guideline for submitting Documentation for the Stability

if Human Drugs and Biologics” Rockville, Maryland,

1987.

cGMP

“Quality systems approach to pharmaceutical current good

manufacturing practice regulations” Rockville,

(31)

ICH guidances

ICH guidances

Guidances

Stability

Q1A(R2): Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products.

Q5C: Stability of Biotechnology/Biological Products

cGMP

Q7A Good Manufacturing Practice for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients

Specifications

Q6A Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for New Drug Substances

and New Drug Products: Chemical Substances

Q6B Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for

(32)

110/07/16 Copyright by Jen-pei Liu, PhD; Pr oduct Names for Illustration only and not for endorsement

32

FDA draft guidances

FDA draft guidances

Draft Guidances

Genomics

-

Pharmcogenomic Data Submissions

-

Multiplex Tests for Heritable DNA Markers, Mutation, and Expression

Pattern

-Instrumentation for Clinical Mulitplex Text Systems

-Drug Metabolizing Enzyme Genotyping System

-Drug-Diagnostic Co-Developmnt – Preliminary Draft Concept Paper

-

多標的陣列平台基因診斷試劑 – 查驗登記審查指引 (2005 年 3

月 ) 衛生署

(33)

Current Issues

Current Issues

Assay Development and Validation

- How to select appropriate weights and model for calibration?

- How to determine sample size?

- How to choose appropriate validation design?

USP/NF Tests and Specifications

- What’s the probability of passing a USP/NF test

(e.g., content uniformity or dissolution testing)?

- How to construct in-house specifications so that if test

results pass the in-house specification there is a high

(34)

110/07/16 Copyright by Jen-pei Liu, PhD; Pr oduct Names for Illustration only and not for endorsement

34

Current Issues

Current Issues

Stability Design and Analysis

- How to select appropriate stability design?

- How to allocate sampling tome points?

- How to deal with batch-to-batch variation?

- International harmonization?

參考文獻

相關文件

GCG method is developed to minimize the residual of the linear equation under some special functional.. Therefore, the minimality property does not hold... , k) in order to construct

For an important class of matrices the more qualitative assertions of Theorems 13 and 14 can be considerably sharpened. This is the class of consistly

● develop teachers’ ability to identify opportunities for students to connect their learning in English lessons (e.g. reading strategies and knowledge of topics) to their experiences

Copyright © 2021 by The Hong Kong Academy for Gifted Education. All

If the best number of degrees of freedom for pure error can be specified, we might use some standard optimality criterion to obtain an optimal design for the given model, and

where L is lower triangular and U is upper triangular, then the operation counts can be reduced to O(2n 2 )!.. The results are shown in the following table... 113) in

Since the subsequent steps of Gaussian elimination mimic the first, except for being applied to submatrices of smaller size, it suffices to conclude that Gaussian elimination

Since the subsequent steps of Gaussian elimination mimic the first, except for being applied to submatrices of smaller size, it suffices to conclude that Gaussian elimination