我國生醫領域研究生資訊素養初探—以分子生物學研究生論文題目發現歷程為例
182
0
0
全文
(2) 誌. 謝. 我決定還是從最初的地方開始，就是什什麼都都沒有，什什麼都都沒看見見過。 只有歌與我，只有風與我，只有我與我，沒有距離離。 如同第一次親耳聽見見張懸唱的並不不，我便便知那一刻即是永恆瞬間。 我想我的感謝之情亦如當時，如此真擎以致於無法言說說說。. 謝謝我的指導教授陳昭珍老老師一直以來來的鼓勵勵和提攜，您的溫暖謙和給予學生最 大的支持。謝謝邱子恒老老師和邱銘心老老師的指導叮嚀，讓我能以更更多元的視角觀看文 本。謝謝我的受訪者，與你們對話讓我反思與收獲良良多。 謝謝圖資所的同學和學長姐，雅方、燕鈴鈴、車車車車、創宏、小白、麗麗嬌、承儀、惠 愛、文杰、鴻晢、芳伶、惠馨、忠勤學長、佳香學姐、苑菁助教、奕翔助教，在課業 和生活上的照顧；謝謝興大的麗麗美姐、蕙貞姐、志文大哥帶領領我進入圖資的世界。謝 謝怡君、贏萩、怡萱、佩牟總是給我鼓勵勵，希望我也能給妳們如此的多。 謝謝小史、林林小平、張懸，你們給了了我信念念，教我如何勇敢直前；謝謝一直陪伴 著我的詠婷，妳是我永遠的怪朋友。謝謝黑潮的反骨店長阿靖靖，還有子淇、子和、阿 諾諾、可嘉，你們從來來都都不不知道你們有多重要。 最後，謝謝我的家人，你們的寬容如此可貴，除了了感謝還是感謝。 願親愛的你/妳們都都能常保美好的心，平安健康。. 102 夏. i.
(3) ii" ".
(4) ACRL Sci-Tech. 20. iii" ".
(5) iv" ".
(6) Abstract The biomedical information environment is in a state of constant and rapid change due to the increase in research data and rapid technological advances. Compared to that information literacy has become an integral part of biomedical higher education abroad, only few studies have so far been made at information literacy training and the assessment of biomedical graduate students in Taiwan. It is important to know whether graduate students use the resources well. The purpose of this study is to explore the information literacy of biomedical graduates in Taiwan. In this study, data were collected through semi-structured interviews, which based on the Association of College and Research Libraries. Information. Literacy. Competency. Standards. for. Science. and. Engineering/Technology. A total of twenty molecular biological graduates are recruited for investigating information-seeking channels and information literacy education they received of topic searching. The findings of this study include that biomedical graduate students discussed their research topic with their advisors. Through a variety of information-seeking channels and retrieval strategies, they could access information efficiently. Also, they could evaluate information and its sources critically. The integration and the spread of information could be done as well. Moreover, most interviewees could concern with social, economic, legal and ethical issues surrounding the use of information. Though seminars, annual conferences and papers, they kept self-learning during the research. The information-seeking channels, including formal and informal ones, could satisfy all different kinds of interviewees’ information need. Most important of all is that college courses and labs were the main information literacy education environment for graduate students to learn about research skills and knowledge. v" ".
(7) In conclusion, there are four characteristics of information literacy of biomedical graduate students. First, using academic information. Secondly, updating latest information. Thirdly,. collecting. relative. information. efficiently.. Finally,. applying. various. information-seeking channels to fulfill information needs. In addition, apprenticeship teaching and lab-based organization learning was the main way of improving the information literacy of biomedical students. However, all interviewees showed little utilization of library resources. It is important for educators to rethink how to improve library services and visibility. Keywords: biomedical graduate students, information literacy, information-seeking channels, information literacy education. vi" ".
(8) ................................................................................................................ 1 ................................................................................................1 ................................................................................................6 ................................................................................................7 .............................................................................................................8. ...................................................................................................... 11 .................................................................................11 .................................................................................18 ...........................................................................................................22 ....................................................................26. /. .............................................42 ...................................................................................................46. .......................................................................................... 49 ...........................................................................................................49 ...........................................................................................................51 ..............................................................................................53 ...........................................................................................................58. ...................................................................................................... 61 .....................................................................................61 .......................................................64 " vii" ".
(9) .....................................................108 .....................................................122 ...........................................................................................................134. ................................................................................................ 145 ..................................................................................................................145 ..................................................................................................................150 ................................................................................................152. .................................................................................................................... 153 .............................................................................................................153 .............................................................................................................154. ................................................................................................ 161 .................................................................................................... 162 ............................................................................................ 163 .................................................................................... 165. " viii" ".
(10) 2-1. ......................................................................... 15. 2-2 ACRL. Sci-Tech. 2-3 ACRL. ILCS. .................................................................... 30. 2-4 SCONUL 2-5 Sci-Tech. .............................................................. 27. ......................................................................... 32 ILCS. .................................... 37. 2-6. ..................................... 38. 2-7. ................................................................................. 39. 3-1. ......................................................................... 55. 4-1. ..................................................................................... 62. 4-2. ..................................................................................... 63. 4-3. ..................................................................................... 63. 4-4. ................................................................................... 138. 4-5. ........................................................... 139. 4-6. ............................................................... 140. 4-7. ................................................................................... 142. " ix" ".
(11) 2-1. ..................................................................................................... 24. 2-2 SCONUL. ......................................................... 34. 3-1. ..................................................................................................... 50. 3-2. ............................................................................. 56. 3-3. ............................................................................................. 59. 4-1. ............................................................................................. 64. x"" ".
(12) (Berman et al., 2011). (Schuster, 2007). 2000. DNA. 2003. 1" ".
(13) (Bundy, 2004). (Jonquet et al., 2011) (biomedical ontology) (terminology). (information model). (Rubin, Shah, & Noy, 2007). Association of College and Research Libraries ACRL. 2" ".
(14) ACRL Information Literacy Standards for Science and Engineering/Technology. Sci-Tech. (ACRL, 2000) Sci-Tech (1). 5. 24 (2). (3) (4). (5). (ACRL) American Association of Medical Colleges. AAMC. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education ACGME. (evidence-based medical, EBM). (Morley & Hendrix, 2012). (AAAS, 2010) (1) (data literacy)—. (MacMillan, 2010) 3". ".
(15) (2). (scientific literacy)— (Porter et al., 2010). (3). (visual literacy, VL)—. (Schönborn & Anderson, 2006) literacy, QL)—. (4). (quantitative (Hack & Kendall,. 2005; Speth et al., 2010) 2000. 2008. 164. 99; 99. ACRL. 4" ". Sci-Tech.
(16) 5" ".
(17) 6" ".
(18) /. (Biggam, 2011). 7" ".
(19) (Smith et al., 2005). 92. Zurkoski. 1974. 1989. (ALA, 1989) 8" ".
(20) (Ontology). 2006 (Smith et al., 2007). 9" ".
(21) 10" ".
(22) /. (Ontology). (Terms) (Smith, 1998). 2006. ontology. (Uschold & Gruninger, 1996). Ontology. Ontology (Ding & Foo, 2002). ontology. 11" ".
(23) (Stevens, Goble, & Bechhofer, 2000). 2006. (Biomedical ontologies). (Baorto, Li, & Cimino, 2009; Smith et al., 2007) (1). —. (operon). (2). (3). — (4). —. (5). —. (6). DNA DNA. (7). —. (Rojas, E., Saric, & Wittig, 2004). 12" ". —. —.
(24) Stevens (2000) (1) (domain-oriented) — (2) (3). (task-oriented) —. (generic) —. (1). —. Ontology for Molecular Biology —. MBO. (2). RiboWeb. EcoCyc Gene Ontology TaO. GO. (4). (3) (5). (Stevens et al., 2000). (terminology). GO. 13" ".
(25) (Hill et al., 2010). (information model). (Rubin et al., 2007). 3. 5 2-1. 14" ".
(26) 2-1. The. Gene Ontology. http://www.arabidopsis.org/. Gene Ontology. http://www.plantgdb.org/AtGDB/. Gene Ontology. http://prosite.expasy.org/. Gene Ontology. http://flybase.org/. Gene Ontology. http://www.genecards.org/. Gene Ontology. http://jbirc.jbic.or.jp/hinv/ahg-db/in. Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR). AtGDB. Database of protein domains, families and functional sites (PROSITE). FlyBase. GeneCards. H-Invitational Database (H-InvDB) microRNA. (miRBase). dex.jsp miRNA. Gene Ontology. 15# #. http://www.mirbase.org/.
(27) Gene Ontology. http://www.informatics.jax.org. Gene Ontology. http://rgd.mcw.edu/. Gene Ontology. http://www.yeastgenome.org/. Gene Ontology. http://www.wormbase.org/#012-3-6. Pathway Ontology. http://www.hmdb.ca/. Pathway Ontology. http://www.genome.jp/kegg/. Cell Line Ontology. http://bioinformatics.istge.it/hypercl. Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI). Rat Genome Database (RGD). Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD). WormBase. Human Metabolome Database (HMDB). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). Hyper Cell Line Data Base. db/indexes.html. (HyperCLDB). 16# #.
(28) Cell Line Ontology. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ipd/. The Immuno Polymorphism Database (IPD) Ensembl. Ontology. http://asia.ensembl.org/index.html. Ontology. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) PubMed. Terminology. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubm ed/. http://science.thomsonreuters.co. Terminology. m/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jloptions.cgi?PC. Science citation index (SCI). =D. 17# #.
(29) Palmer (2005). (Palmer, 2005) 95. 18# #.
(30) 1980 2000. DNA. (1). (2). (3). 2003. PubMed (Lieberman et al., 2011). 19# #.
(31) National Center for Biotechnology Information NCBI 1988 public law 100-687. NCBI. Institutes of Health Medicine. National. NIH NLM. National Library of. NCBI. (1). (2). (3) 1992. DDBJ. NCBI DNA. EMBL —GenBank. (National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2013) GenBank. NCBI. (1) PubMed—. MEDLINE 2. 2. (2) Entrez (3) BLAST (Basic Local. Alignment Search Tool). DNA. (4) OMIM (Online Mendelian Inheritance In Man) (5) Taxonomy GenBank. (6) Structure 3D. NCBI 20#. #.
(32) (Genome Biology Resource). (National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2013) Expert Protein Analysis System ExPASy. ExPASy. (Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics,. SIB) SIB ExPASy. PROSITE. SWISS 2DPAGE. 14. DNA. (ExPASy, 2013) European Molecular Biology network 1988. EMBnet. EMBnet. 2011 33. EMBnet. 30 25 8. 2005. 2. 92 21# #.
(33) 1991. (Public Law 102-73, the National Literacy Act of. 1991, Section 3). 83. (functional literacy). 87. Johnston. Webber (2005) Doyle (1994) Lorenzo. Oblinger (2). Dziuban (2006). (1) (3). (ALA). 1989 22#. #.
(34) (Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report). (ALA, 1989). Grassian. Kaplowitz (2001) 1991. George Bush. 2000. 2000. America. What Work Requires of. Schools. (Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills, 1991) McClure (1994). 1.. (traditional literacy). 2.. (computer literacy). 3.. (media literacy) (post-print media). 4.. (network literacy). 23# #.
(35) 2-1. MaClure (1994). 2-1 McClure, C. R. (1994). Network literacy: a role for libraries? Information Technology and Libraries, 13(2), p118, fig1.. 1996. 24# #.
(36) 1992 Educational Resources Information Center ERIC. (National. Foum on Information Literacy, 1989). Bruce (2004). 2012. 25# #.
(37) ACRL. Sci-Tech /. ACRL. /. 1974. Zurkowski (The Information Service Environment Relationships. and Priorities). (Leung, 2002) ACRL 2002. 1. Science & Technology Section Task Force. 2004. ALA. ACRL STS. STS. /. Information Literacy. Standards for Science and Engineering/Technology. Sci-Tech. (Baldwin,. 2005) Sci-Tech. 5. 24 26#. #. 2-2.
(38) (1). (2). (3) /. (4). (5). (American Library Association, Association of College and Research Libraries, and Science and Technology Section’s Task Force on Information Literacy for Science and Technology, 2006). 2-2. ACRL. Sci-Tech. 1. 2. 3. 4.. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.. / 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.. / 27#. #.
(39) 6. 7.. 1. 2.. 3. 4. 5. 6.. 1. 2. Association of College and Research Libraries, Information Literacy Standards for Science and Engineering/Technology, 2006. Retrieved December 26, 2012,. from. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/infolitsci-tech. ACRL. /. (ACRL, 2000 ALA, 1989) ACRL SCONUL. CAUL. Big Six information skills model. 28# #. ILCS.
(40) (Eisenberg, & Berkowitz, 1999) 1.. (task definition) —. 2.. (information seeking strategies) —. 3.. (location & access) —. 4.. (use of information) —. 5.. (synthesis) —. 6.. (evaluation) — K-12 Eisenberg. 1-12. Berkowitz (1999). ACRL. Information Literacy. Competency Standards for Higher Education 2002 5009. ILCS Rader. 1973-2002 (Rader,. 2002) (National Institute for Literacy, 1991) (Ferguson, Neely, & Sullivan, 2006) 29# #.
(41) Dinkelman (2010). ACRL. ILCS. (1). (2). (3) (4). (5) (ACRL 2000). 22. (. 2-3. 2-3). ACRL. ILCS. 1. 2. 3. 4.. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.. 30# #. 5.
(42) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.. /. 7.. 1. 2. 3.. 1. 2. 3. Association of College and Research Libraries, Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education, 2000. Retrieved December 26, 2012,. from. http://www.ala.org/acrl/ standards/information-literacycompetency. Emmett. Emde (2007). ACRL. ILCS. ACRL. (Blackall, 2002) Society of College, National and University 31# #.
(43) Libraries. SCONUL. (Information Skills. in Higher Education) 2011. 7. 49. of College, National and University Libraries, 2011). 2-4. SCONUL. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.. 1. 2. 3. 4. 32# #. 2-4. #. (Society.
(44) 5. 6.. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 33# #.
(45) 6. 7. 8. 9. Society of College, National and University Libraries. (2011). The SCONUL seven pillars of information literacy: core model. Retrieved July 19, 2013, from http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/coremodel.pdf. SCONUL. 2-2. 2-2 SCONUL Society of College, National and University Libraries. (2011). The SCONUL seven 34# #.
(46) pillars of information literacy: core model. Retrieved July 19, 2013, from http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/coremodel.pdf. Council of Australian University Librarians CAUL CAUL. 2001 7. (Information Literacy Standards) 10. ACRL 25. ILCS 102. ALA. (Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report) (1) (3). (4). (2) (5). (6) (7). (8) (9). (10). (11). CAUL. 1. 2. 3.. 4. 5.. 35# #.
(47) 6.. 7.. ACRL. Sci-Tech. ILCS /. ILCS. Sci-Tech —. — —. — —. Sci-Tech. ILC. 2-5. 36# #. ILCS.
(48) 2-5. Sci-Tech. ILCS. ILCS. Sci-Tech. 37# #.
(49) ILCS. Sci-Tech RSS. (Aydelott, 2007) 2-6. CAUL. (Webber & Johnston, 2003) SCONUL. 7 6. 49. 12. 2-6. 2000. 5. 22. 1990. 6. 12. SCONUL. 2011. 7. 49. CAUL. 2001. 7. 25. ACRL. ILCS. 1-12. 38# #. 87. 102.
(50) 2004. ACRL Sci-Tech /. 5. 24. /. ACRL. ILCS. (1) (2). (3). (4). (5). 2-7 2-7. / ACRL ILCS. / SCONUL. 1.. 2.. 3.. 4.. 1.. 2.. 5.. 4.. 3.. 6.. 3.. 5.. 1.. 6. 39#. #. 104. 5.. 6..
(51) 2.. 4. 7.. / CAUL. 1.. 2.. 3.. 4.. 6.. 7.. 4.. 5.. 5.. / ACRL Sci-Tech. 1.. 2.. 3.. 4.. / /. ILCS CAUL 40# #. Sci-Tech.
(52) Sci-Tech /. 41# #.
(53) /. (ACRL). (AAMC). (ACGME). (Morley & Hendrix, 2012) Welborn. Kanar (2000). Brahmi. ACRL. Sci-Tech. 3-D. /. 42# #. (1999).
(54) (Leung, 2002) ACRL. Sci-Tech. Bracke. Critz (2001). (1). (2). (3) (4). (5). ACRL. ILCS. Manuel (2004). (National Science Education Content Standards, ILCS. Aydelott (2007). Sci-Tech 2006. (American Physical Society) (Yale’s Kline Science Library). Aydelott (2007). 43# #. NSECS) ILCS.
(55) ACRL. Sci-Tech. /. (Aydelott, 2007) Holden (2010) Sci-Tech. —. Hazen. 81%. Sci-Tech. —. ILCS. Jurecki. Wander (2012). 44# #. 2002.
(56) /. (Aydelott, 2007; Holden, 2010; Jurecki & Wander, 2012). ACRL. Sci-Tech. 45# #.
(57) 2010. (Poock & Love, 2001). Lei (2009). (1) (2). (3). —. — (4). —. (1) — (2). — 46#. #.
(58) (3). —. (4) (5). —. (6) (7). —. — — (Lei, 2009). (Gitanjali, 2005) Pansiri (2009). (gap). 47# #.
(59) (Pansiri, 2009). 48# #.
(60) 3-1 / 3. 49# #. /.
(61) 1. 2.. ( ). 3.. (. ). 4. 5.. 1.. 1.. (. 2. ) 2. (seminar) 3.. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.. 3-1. 50# #.
(62) DNA. RNA. (Crick, 1970). (Troubleshooting) (Henderson & Buising, 51# #.
(63) 2001). 1. 2.. /. 3.. 52# #.
(64) (Wilson, 2000). 2001. 3-1 ACRL. Sci-Tech. 53#. #.
(65) 15. ACRL. Sci-Tech. 54#. #. (outcomes).
(66) 3-1 11. (seminar) 12.. (meeting). 9.. Brown(2005) Green(2000) Morley & Hendrix(2012). 2003 Brown(2005) Lieberman et al. (2011) Judd & Kennedy(2011). 10.. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 14.. ACRL. 2000 ACRL Sci-Tech. 1.. /. 2. 3. 13.. 55#. #. ILCS. 2004 Ferguson et al. (2006) Emmett & Emde(2007) Carr, Iredell, Newton-Smith, & Clark(2011).
(67) 20. /. 3-2. #. 3-2. 56#. #.
(68) G 12-15. G. 12-15. Endnote Endnote. reference Endnote. B 240-242. 1.. 2.. 57#. #. cite.
(69) 20. 3-3. 58#. #.
(70) 59#. #.
(71) 60#. #.
(72) ACRL. 10. Sci-Tech. 4-1 A. J. 10. N. W. 10. 20. 4-2 19. 1. 11. 6 61#. #.
(73) 2. 1. 4-3. 4-1 (. ). A. 63. 483. B. 42. 314. C. 25. 201. D. 39. 319. E. 53. 320. F. 49. 385. G. 74. 426. H. 65. 515. I. 62. 388. J. 63. 435. N. 37. 254. O. 35. 290. P. 42. 354. Q. 43. 316. R. 44. 386. S. 42. 301. T. 60. 454. U. 59. 393. V. 53. 380. W. 47. 286. 62#. #.
(74) # # 4-2. 5. 3. 0. 0. 1. 0. 1. 10. 2. 2. 2. 1. 2. 1. 0. 10. 7. 5. 2. 1. 3. 1. 1. 20. # 4-3. 5. 3. 1. 1. 10. 6. 3. 1. 0. 10. 11. 6. 2. 1. 20. 63#. #.
(75) ACRL Sci-Tech. 4-1. . . . . 4-1. 64#. #.
(76) DNA. RNA. 1.. G. G 65#. #.
(77) G. 11-13. 19-21. 2. O O. O. 14-15. 3.. (review article) V. (review paper). V review paper. review paper protein. function 66#. #.
(78) review paper. V. 4.. 42-45. (research article) G. G. G. 23-24. 1. 67#. #.
(79) D. D. introduction reference D. background. 26-29. 2.. PubMed U. PubMed. PubMed U NCBI PubMed NCBI U 3.. 25-28 Google. Google. Google Google T. V 68#. #.
(80) Google. basic PubMed NCBI. Medline. T 49-52. Google Scholar Google publish V. science paper. 85-86. 4. N. N. reference N 33-34. 69#. #.
(81) 1.. P P. paper paper P. 50-52. 2. J. J low(. ). paper paper J. 91-93. 70#. #.
(82) 3. G. G. G. 1. 71#. #. 96-98.
(83) O. O. O. 72-74. 2.. A. Data A. 51-52. 3. Q PubMed. Google Q Google paper. keyword. NCBI. NCBI. review review. abstract. NCBI key word 72#. #. keyword.
(84) Google. Q. 50-53. 4.. S B P. S. B P. …. S. 154-169. … 73#. #. S.
(85) B 158-162. P. 96-98. A B E F G H I N O R S V. W. 13. P. E S. T. 74#. #.
(86) Google. Google 1.. PubMed I. 19. B. PubMed. P. PubMed center. paper. reference protein. reference. paper B 33-35. PubMed. P 2.. 259-260. Google G. PubMed. Google 75#. #.
(87) G Google. Google paper. G 3.. 94-96. Google. Google E O. E Google ELISA. Google. O Google. protocol. Google E 163-164 wikipedia PubMed. NCBI. …. PubMed. Google. O 76#. #. 33-38.
(88) G. hyperglycemia high glucose G. 42-44. 77#. #.
(89) A. interleukin-6 liver fibrosis. interleukin-6. liver fibrosis interleukin-6. signal pathway fibrosis. liver model. P. A. 45-48. O signaling. pathway. Google Google. P. 190-192 BLAST. function NCBI. 90-91. 78#. #. O.
(90) I reference. review. reference. review. paper. cite. paper. paper cite. I. cite. 44-46. I journal club. topic 79#. #.
(91) I. T S. 104-106. C. paper. … paper. T 318-325 paper S. journal. 255-256. Blood Cancer Research C. 159-160. 80#. #.
(92) J. …. J 265-267 289-291. D. U. G. 81#. #.
(93) U. 35-39. keywords ⋯ keywords. G. 72-74. A. …. Liver. Fibrosis. A. 478-481. 82#. #.
(94) S title. correlation. S. 25-26. G Endnote paper paper. PDF. paper. G. paper. 278-282. 83#. #.
(95) R. R background download. R 250-252. U. U power&point power& point. data power&point paper power& point U. 223-228. 84#. #.
(96) 1. 20 F. F. F 85#. #. 77-80.
(97) 2. G T. G. T. G 51-52 gene. key. gene. paper. gene. T 111-113 3.. (IF) A B F G I N O P Q R S T O Q. P. O. Q. P. narrow down 86#. #. W. 13.
(98) O. 51-53 paper. reviewer Q. …. 74-75. journal. editor journal. P 88-90. 4. U. U Plant Physiology New Phytol U. 93-94. 5.. D. P paper group. group 87#. #.
(99) group D. P. 264-266. 69-71. E. Q. E 87-88 paper 88#. #. data.
(100) …. paper. data. Q. 71-74. V publish. bio-information confirm. V. 114-115. U. R power point. power point. data. U. 223-225 paper. 89#. #.
(101) confirm paper. R 170-171. 1. E. E. meeting. data. E. 278-280 2.. 90#. #.
(102) B. P. B 285-287. data P 269-270 3. S N S. S 228-229. N 91#. #. 197-198. N.
(103) D. G. D. G ⋯. key. paper. D. 63-64. G 66-68. 1. 92#. #.
(104) W. W. W 276-278 2. W. W. W 278-282. 93#. #.
(105) R. 1. A A Cite Cite …. Cite A. 370-371. 2.. I. B. B A 94#. #. cite B.
(106) …. ABC. cite B. reference. B cite. cite C I. A reference. 282-285 paper. discussion. introduction. cite. cite review. cite. result review. B 264-265 B E. J. P. R. S. U. B P. R E. cite. review. cite. reivew review. reference. cite review. cite review 95#. #. cite.
(107) reference. reference B 407-412. P. 162-163. A reference. cite. B. A reference. B. A A A R. cite. cite. reference. A. 306-309 citation. A. B. B B paper. B paper A. B cite. E 249-251. 3.. O. O 96#. #.
(108) paper. key in Endnote paper B. A. pattern. pattern. O. 224-227. 1.. J. N seminar. paper 97#. #.
(109) J. 379-381. 2.. Q P. power point. T. Q. 310-311 power point meeting power point. P. 344-346 seminar. paper. paper support. proposal. 98#. #. data. T 209-211.
(110) 1. U Q U Q PDF power point U paper. 217-218 power. point paper. Q. 94-95. 2.. J J …. seminar 99#. #.
(111) J. 128-131. 146-149. W. I W. I ⋯ Science 100#. #.
(112) editor. W 127-129. PubMed paper. I. V. 108-110. R V. R. V. 144. say no. R. 202-204. 101#. #.
(113) ID. 1.. I. I. 123-124. E. E 187-189 2. 102#. #.
(114) E. F E. F. E 203-204. OK F. 137-138. 3.. P T. P. reference. T. 376-377 103#. #. 157-158.
(115) 1.. G. T. G. 104#. #. 66-68.
(116) OK. information. T 447-450. 2. (review journals). E. E review. background review. review review. paper. E 92-94. 3. U. U follow. U 105#. #. 211-213.
(117) 4.. S T. S. T paper. S. 266-269. T 429-433. 106#. #.
(118) 1.. F F. F. 368-371. 2. F NCBI F NCBI NCBI F. 378-379. 107#. #. database.
(119) 88. PubMed. 1. MEDLINE PubMed. PubMed. MEDLINE 20. B. T. 108#. #.
(120) PubMed center. paper. reference protein. reference. paper B 33-35. MEDLINE. PubMed. T 271-272 Science Citation Index. SCI SCI. JCR. SCI. JCR I. N. O. P. Q. R S. T. W. A B F G 13 B. F. S SCI SCI. journal. JCR. SCI. B 270-271 paper paper. SCI 5%. 109#. #. F.
(121) 155-156 arthritis Impact Factor …. Impact Factor paper. SCI S. JCR. 242-245. 2. DNA RNA. D U. V. 11. E F. G. PubMed. H. (Genome) NCBI O BLAST. E D. O. 90-91 Genome. Genome. sequence E 214-215 protein structure 96 110#. #. V. function NCBI. D. R S. (Structure). Ensembl. Genetax. O. (Nucleotide). (BLAST). …. J.
(122) Ensembl. protein sequence. alignment. protein domain V. 3D. 119-120. 3.. knockout mice F I S T. V. (TAIR) microRNA. (miRBase). (GeneCards) F. I. S. (FlyBase). (MGI) T V. TAIR microRNA. F. 236-237. FlyBase I. fly. 382-383. Protein Database UniGene. S. 146. paper. gene GeneCards paper 111#. #.
(123) T 63-65 MGI. Mouse Genome. Informatics knockout mice. phenotype V. 107-110. 4.. U. V (KEGG) U. KEGG pathway U. 143-145. pathway KEGG. pathway. Google. information. G. I. P. #. 88-89. T. Nature Cell 112#. V. Science. V.
(124) G. I. P. T. CELL Google. G journal club. PubMed. 308-309 journal club. topic I. 104-106 journal Science. … Nature. Cell. Planta Medica. … PubMed. … Hepatology P. PNAS Cell Nature gastro. Hepatology T 173. 113#. #. 175-183.
(125) Google. Google. J. V. P. Google. I. Google. paper. J. Google Scholar. Google. science. publish. paper V. signaling pathway Google. Google. P. 190-192. protocol. Google po 114#. #. 78-79. 85-86.
(126) reference Scholar. PubMed. detail. Google. B 24-26. O H E Endnote O. H. E V. O 128-129. H. 453-454. EBISCO PubMed E 177-178. 115#. #. B.
(127) V. 302-304. Endnote. B 235-236. Google. B C. H. B 218-220. journal. Blood Cancer Research … journal C 159-165 PubMed. 116#. #.
(128) H. 271-273. 20. V S. T. paper V 205-207. S 266-269. T 429-432. 117#. #.
(129) U. U. S. S. U. 330-331. S. N. 273-274. I. G. … 192-193 118#. #. E. N. A.
(130) I. 21-22. …. G. 15-21. meeting. data. E. 278-280 Liver Fibrosis. A 37-38. 119#. #.
(131) G. N. U. W A. T. group. …. meeting. PBL…. database. G. 74-80 proposal. N. 232-233. U. W 276-278. 120#. #. 377-378.
(132) trouble shooting OK. A. 36-38. T 398-400. S T. S. 228-229. T 398-400 Journal. O 126-128 121#. #. O.
(133) 20. P. P. Q. Q. P. 351-352. Q 122#. #. 294-295.
(134) G. T. G. T. R. R. paper paper G. 98-100. PubMed key word T 421-422 seminar paper. 123#. #.
(135) reference reference A. R 365-367 Q. W. 20% (Review article). G. B C D. E. G Impact Factor paper Impact Factor 20%. B 192-193 5. C 68. D. Paper. paper. Communication. …. paper review 124#. #. 187. Review.
(136) E 40-45. …. G 197-202. 20. B F A. mechanism. model model. …. detail reference. 125#. #. B 122-125. 188-190. O.
(137) F 161-166. PPT model A. 133-135. O. 114-116. A B C D E F G H J P Q. G. A. T 12. H Paper. PubMed G. 110-112 PPT. model A 126#. #. 133-135.
(138) paper. abstract. proposal. abstract H. F. 404-405. J. presentation. F. 350-352. … A. C. D. E. G. G. H. I. J. U. U. copy paste. paper. 127#. #. 9. J. 114-115.
(139) G. 366-369. abstract abstract U. 269-270. B E F G H J N O P Q S T U V. F. V. W. 15. W database. meeting. paper. NCBI. database F. 57-59 paper. paper. V. 250-251. PubMed …. W 128#. #. 200-201.
(140) 276-278. E I. B. paper paper E 116-118. paper I. 138-139. paper mechanism mechanism potential. B 137-139 20. P 129#. #.
(141) S. U. G. P. paper paper. paper paper. S. 141-143 meeting. U. 292-295. data. G. 347-350. data …. P. 305-306 349-350. E H I J R S U. V 130#. #. 8.
(142) E. H. meeting PPT E 324-325. PPT H. A. E F. B. 194-195. J. 17. Q PubMed. Endnote. abstract citation. Endnote E 241-243. Endnote F. 325 Endnote. 131#. #.
(143) Q. 229. 20. C W I. S. G. P. … speaker I. 364-376. S. poster. G. 276-278. 392. abstract P 273-275. 132#. #. E. F.
(144) A D G O P R S. G. S. Endnote OK. citation. Endnote. Endnote. …. G. …. 247-250. reference Endnote. S. 185-186. P. P P …. P. 324-330. 133#. #.
(145) 15. 134#. #. 75%.
(146) 13. 65% 15. 75% 20. 135#. #.
(147) 3. 75% 20. 15. 75% 5 136#. #. 25%.
(148) 18. 90%. 8. 40% 15. 11. 75%. 55% (Review article). (Research article). 18. 90% 2. 137#. #. 10%.
(149) 4-4 10. 10 4-4. 4-4. 1.. 10. 10. 2.. 10. 10. 3.. 10. 10. 4.. 10. 10. 1.. 10. 10. 2.. 10. 10. 3.. 10. 8. 4.. 10. 10. 5.. 9. 9. 1.. 10. 10. 2.. 10. 10. 3.. 10. 10. 4.. 10. 10. 5.. 10. 10. 1.. 8. 7. 2.. 10. 10. 3.. 10. 10. 1.. 10. 8. 2.. 10. 8. 1.. 10. 10. 2.. 0. 2. 138#. #.
(150) 20. 4-5. 4-5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3.. 139#. #.
(151) 20. 4-6. 4-6. 10. 10. 8. 5 5. 4. (. 10. 10. 10. 9. 8. 5. ). 10 10. 1. 140#. #.
(152) 2.. 15. ACRL Sci-Tech. 141#. #.
(153) 4-7 4. 4 (PubMed). 4-7. 4-7. 1. –. (PubMed). 0. 4. 1. 0. 1. 5. 8. 9. 8. 9. 3. 7. 5.. 1. 2. 6.. 1. 1. 2. 1. 2.. (PubMed) IF. 3. –. 4.. 142#. #.
(154) 1.. 9. 6. 8. 6. 3.. 9. 6. 4.. 9. 7. 5.. 10. 8. 6.. 3. 4. 7.. 1. 1. 8.. 9. 6. 9.. 2. 3. 9. 7. 4. 3. PubMed 2.. Google IF. 10.. 143#. #.
(155) 144#. #.
(156) 1. PubMed Google. 20 PubMed Google. Google 145#. #.
(157) PubMed. 2.. 3.. 4. 18. EndNote. EndNote. 146#. #.
(158) 1.. 2.. 3.. 147#. #.
(159) 1.. 4-4. 4-5. 148#. #.
(160) 149#. #.
(161) Google. Google. 150#. #.
(162) 10% 20. 151#. #.
(163) 152#. #.
(164) 2001 A. Srauss & J. Corbin (2001). 1997. 1996. 73 88. 4-5. –. 99 26-38 83 NSC83-0111-S002-006-TL 1 2003. 1. 1–11. 2008. 5. 46-55 95 2(1). 15–42 2010. 2(4). 72-96. 87. — 35. 27. 92. 19 2012. 19. 2013. http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679154/ 2006. 99 153#. #. 154-167 7.
(165) 57(5). 18-23. 2000. 6. 77-102. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2010). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. Retrieved January 12, 2013, from http://visionandchange.org/ files/2010/03/VC_report.pdf American Library Association. (1989). American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report. Retrieved December 23, 2012, from http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/whitepapers/presidential.htm American Library Association, Association of College and Research Libraries, and Science and Technology Section’s Task Force on Information Literacy for Science and Technology. (2006). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Science and Engineering/Technology. Retrieved December 30, 2012, from http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl /standards/infolitscitech.cfm Association of College and Research Libraries. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Aydelott, K. (2007). Using the ACRL information literacy competency standards for science and engineering technology to develop a modular critical-thinking-based information literacy Tutorial. Science & Technology Libraries, 27(4), 19-24. doi: 10.1300/J122v27n04_03 Baldwin, V. (2005). Science and technology Iinformation literacy:review of standards developed by an association task force. Science & Technology Libraries, 25(3), 117-125. doi: 10.1300/J122v25n03_08 Baorto, D., Li, L., & Cimino, J. J. (2009). Practical experience with the maintenance and auditing of a large medical ontology. J Biomed Inform, 42(3), 494-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.03.005 Berman, E., Baruzzi, A., Bogucka, R., MacAlpine, B., Sparks, O., & Sapp-Nelson, M. (2011). Report on the 5-year review of the information literacy standards for 154#. #.
(166) science and engineering/technology: STS Information Literacy Standards Review Task Force. Biggam, J. (2011). Succeeding with your master’s dissertation: A step-by-step handbook (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Blackall, C. (2002). Rethinking information literacy in higher education: the case for informatics. Paper presented at the 11th Biennial VALA Conference 6-8 Feb, Melbourne. Bracke, M. S., & Critz, L. J. (2001). Re-envisioning instruction for the electronic environment of a 21st century science-engineering library. Science & Technology Libraries, 20(2), 97-106. Brahmi, F. A., London, S. K., Emmett, T. W., Barclay, A. R., & Kaneshiro, K. N. (1999). Teaching Lifelong Learning Skills in a Fourth-Year Medical Curriculum. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 18(2), 1-11. doi: 10.1300/J115v18n02_01 Brown, C. (2005). Where do molecular biology graduate students find information? Science & Technology Libraries, 25(3), 89-104. doi: 10.1300/J122v25n03_06 Bruce, C. S. (2004). Information literacy as a catalyst for educational change.A background paper. Paper presented at the Proceedings “Lifelong Learning: Whose responsibility and what is your contribution?”, the 3rd International Lifelong Learning Conference, Yeppoon, Queensland. Bundy, S. (Ed.). (2004). Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework: principles, standards and practice (2nd ed.). South Australia: Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy. Carr, S., Iredell, H., Newton-Smith, C., & Clark, C. (2011). Evaluation of information literacy skill development in first year medical students. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 42(2), 136-148. Crick, F. (1970). Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature, 227, 562-563. Dinkelman, A. L. (2010). Using course syllabi to assess research expectations of biology majors: implications for further development of information literacy skills in the curriculum. Science & Technology Librarianship. Retrieved 155#. #.
(167) December 30, 2012, from http://www.istl.org/10- winter/refereed3.html Ding, Y., & Foo, S. (2002). Ontology research and development. Part 1 - a review of ontology generation. Journal of Information Science, 28(2), 123-136. doi: 10.1177/016555150202800204 Doyle, C. S. (1994). Information literacy in an information society: a concept for the information age. Syracuse, N.Y.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology. Emmett, A., & Emde, J. (2007). Assessing information literacy skills using the ACRL standards as a guide. Reference Services Review, 35(2), 210-229. doi: 10.1108/00907320710749146 Eisenberg, M. B., & Berkowitz, R. E. (1999). Teaching information & technology skills: the big6 in elementary schools. Worthington, OH: Linworth Publishing. ExPASy. (n.d.). Retrieved January 1, 2013, from http://www.expasy.org/ Ferguson, J. E., Neely, T. Y., & Sullivan, K. (2006). A baseline information literacy assessment of biology students. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 46(2), 61-71. Gitanjali, B. (2005). Identifying a research topic-the problem is the problem... Indian J Pharmacol, 37(1), 67-68. Grassian, E. S., & Kaplowitz J. R. (2001). Information Literacy Instruction: Theory and Practice. New York: Neal-Schuman. Green, M. L. (2000). Evidence-based medicine training in graduate medical education: past, present and future. J Eval Clin Pract, 6(2), 121-138. Hack, C., & Kendall, G. (2005). Bioinformatics: current practice and future challenges for life science education. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 33(2), 82-85. Henderson, L., & Buising, C. (2001). A research-based molecular biology laboratory. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30(5), 322-327. Hill, D. P., Berardini, T. Z., Howe, D. G., & Van Auken, K. M. (2010). Representing 156#. #.
(168) ontogeny through ontology: a developmental biologist's guide to the gene ontology. Mol Reprod Dev, 77(4), 314-329. doi: 10.1002/mrd.21130 Holden, I. I. (2010). Science literacy and lifelong learning in the classroom: a measure of attitudes among university students. Journal of Library Administration, 50(3), 265-282. doi: 10.1080/01930821003635002 Johnston, B., & Webber, S. (2005). As we may think: Information literacy as a discipline for the information age. Research Strategies, 20(3), 108-121. doi: 10.1016/j.resstr.2006.06.005 Jonquet, C., LePendua, P., Falconera, S., Couleta, A., Noya, N. F., Musena, M. A., & Shah, N. H. (2011). NCBO resource index: ontology-based search and mining of biomedical resources. Web Semant, 9(3), 316-324.. doi:10.1016/j.websem.2011.. 06.005 Judd, T., & Kennedy, G. (2011). Expediency-based practice? Medical students' reliance on Google and Wikipedia for biomedical inquiries. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 351-360. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01019.x Jurecki, K., & Wander, M. C. F. (2012). Science literacy, critical thinking, and scientific literature: guidelines for evaluating scientific literature in the classroom. Journal of Geoscience Education, 60(2), 100-105. doi: 1089-9995/2012/60(2) /100/6 Lei, S. A. (2009). Strategies for finding and selecting an ideal thesis or dissertation topic: a review of literature. College Student Journal, 43(4), 1324-1332. Leung, S. (2002). Information Literacy: Theory and Practice. Paper presented at the Proceedings A Seminar on Technical Colleges and Polytechnic University Libraries: Co-operation and Prospects (. ) , 2002. Lieberman, M. D., Taheri, S., Guo, H., Mirrashed, F., Yahav, I., Aris, A., & Shneiderman, B. (2011). Visual exploration across biomedical databases. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 8(2), 536-550. Lorenzo, G., Oblinger, D., & Dziuban, C. (2006). How choice, co-creation, and 157#. #.
(169) culture are changing what It means to be net savvy. Educause. Retrieved December 23, 2012, from http://oit-dev.drake.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/ StudentChoice.pdf MacMillan, D. (2010). Sequencing genetics information: Integrating data into information literacy for undergraduate biology students. Issues in Science and Technology. Librarianship,. 61.. Retrieved. December. 23,. 2012,. from. http://www.istl.org/10-spring/refereed3.html Manuel, K. (2004). Generic and discipline-specific information literacy competencies: The case of the sciences. Science & Technology Libraries, 24(2), 279-308. doi: 10.1300/J122v24n03_05 McClure, C. R. (1994). Network literacy: a role for libraries? Information Technology and Libraries, 13(2), 115-125. Morley, S. K., & Hendrix, I. C. (2012). "Information survival skills": a medical school. elective.. J. Med. Libr. Assoc,. 100(4),. 297-302.. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.100.4.012 National Center for Biotechnology Information. (n.d.). Retrieved January 1, 2013, from http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov National Forum on Information Literacy. (1989). A Progress Report on Information Literacy: An Update on the American Library Association Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report. Retrieved December 23, 2012, from http://www.infolit.org/documents/progress.htm National Institute for Literacy, Public Law 102-73, the National Literacy Act of 1991, Section 3. Retrieved December 22, 2012, from http://www.nifl.gov/publiclaw.html Palmer, C. L. (2005). Scholarly work and the shaping of digital access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(11), 1140-1153. doi: 10.1002/asi.20204 Pansiri, J. (2009). Evolution of a doctoral thesis research topic and methodology: A personal experience. Tourism Management, 30(1), 83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman. 2008.04.001 158#. #.
(170) Poock, M. C., & Love, P. G. (2001). Factors influencing the program choice of doctoral students in higher education administration. NASPA Journal, 38(2), 203-223. Porter, J. A., Wolbach, K. C., Purzycki, C. B., Bowman, L. A., Agbada, E., & Mostrom, A. M. (2010). Integration of information and scientific literacy: promoting literacy in undergraduates. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9, 536-542. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-01-0006 Rader, H. B. (2002). Information literacy 1973–2002: a selected literature review. Library Trends, 51(2), 242-259. Rojas, I., E., Ratsch, Saric, J., & Wittig, U. (2004). Notes on the use of ontologies in the biochemical domain. In Silico Biology, 4, 89-96. Rubin, D. L., Shah, N. H., & Noy, N. F. (2007). Biomedical ontologies: a functional perspective. Brief Bioinform, 9(1), 75-90. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbm059 Schönborn, K. J., & Anderson, T. R. (2006). The importance of visual literacy in the education of biochemists. Biochemistry and Biology Education, 34(2), 94-102. Schuster, S. M. (2007). Information literacy as a core value. Biochemistry and Biology Education, 35(5), 372-373. doi: 10.1002/bambed.100 Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. (1991). What Work Requires of Schools: a SCANS Report for America 2000. Retrieved December 23, 2012, from http://wdr.doleta.gov/SCANS/whatwork/whatwork.pdf Smith, B. (1998). The basic tools of formal ontology. In N. Guarino (Ed.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems (pp. 19-28). Amsterdam, Oxford, Tokyo, Washington, DC: IOS Press (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications). Smith, B., Ashburner, M., Rosse, C., Bard, J., Bug, W., Ceusters, W.,& Lewis, S. (2007). The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical. data. integration.. Nat. Biotechnol,. 25(11),. 1251-1255.. doi:. 10.1038/nbt1346 Society of College, National and University Libraries. (2011). The SCONUL seven 159#. #.
(171) pillars of information literacy: core model. Retrieved July 19, 2013, from http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/coremodel.pdf Speth, E. B., Momsen, J. L., Moyerbrailean, G. A., Ebert-May, D., Long, T. M., Wyse, S., & Linton, L. (2010). 1,2,3,4: Infusing quantitative literacy into introductory biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9, 323-332. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-030033 Stevens, R., Goble, C. A., & Bechhofer, S. (2000). Ontology-based knowledge representation for bioinformatics. Brief Bioinform, 1(4), 398-414. Uschold, M., & Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2), 93-136. Webber, S., & Johnston, B. (2003). Information Literacy: Standards and Statements, Retrieved January 2, 2013, from http://dis.shef.ac.uk/literacy/standards.htm Welborn, V., & Kanar, B. (2000). Building websites for science literacy. Science and Technology. Librarianship,. 25.. Retrieved. December. 30,. 2012,. from. http://www.istl.org/00-winter/article 2.html Wilson, T. D. (2000). Recent trends in user studies: action research and qualitative methods. Information Research, 5(3). Retrieved July 19, 2013, from http://informationr.net/ir/5-3/paper76.html. 160#. #.
(172) 60~90. ○ 161#. #.
(173) 1.. /. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.. (seminar) (meeting). 13.. 14. 15.. 162#. #.
(174) 1.. /. 2. 3. 4.. 1. a. b. c. 2. a. b. c. 3. a. b. c. (. ). 4. a. 5. a. b. c. 1. 2. 1. 2. 163#. #.
(175) (seminar) 1. 2. 3. (meeting) 1. 2. 3. 4. 1. 2. 3. 4.. 164#. #.
(176) 1. a. b. c. d. e. f. 2. a. b. c. 3D d. e. f.. 3. a. b. c. d.. e. 165#. #.
(177) f.. 4. a.. b. c. d.. e.. 1. a. b. c. 2. a. b. c. d. e.. f. 3. 166#. #.
(178) a. b. c. / d. 4. a. b. c. 5. a.. b. c. d.. 1. a. b. c. 2. a. 167#. #.
(179) b. c. d. e. f. g. 3. a. b. c.. 4. a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. 5.. /. a. b. 168#. #.
(180) c. 6. a. b. c. 7. a. b.. 1. a. b. c. 2. a. b. 3. a. b. c. 4. a. b. c. 169#. #.
(181) d.. 1.. a. b. c. d. 2.. a. b.. ID. c. d. e. f. g.. 1. a. b. c. d.. 2. 170#. #.
(182) a. b. c. d. e.. RSS. 171#. #.
(183)
相關文件
Science education provides learning experiences for students to develop scientific literacy with a firm foundation on science, realise the relationship between science, technology,
In the context of public assessment, SBA refers to assessments administered in schools and marked by the student’s own teachers. The primary rationale for SBA in ICT is to enhance
American Association of School Librarians, Association for Educational Communications and Technology.. Information power: Building partnerships
Graphene: leading the way in material science and technology.. The 2010 Nobel Prize
STEM : Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Interdisciplinary and
Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chaoyang University of
Menou, M.著(2002)。《在國家資訊通訊技術政策中的資訊素養：遺漏的層 面，資訊文化》 (Information Literacy in National Information and Communications Technology (ICT)
• 參考「香港學生資訊素養架構」 參考「香港學生資訊素養 架構」 參考「香港學生資訊素養架構」 *，推行全校參與方 式 推行全校參與方式 的校本資訊素養 課程 ，例如 ，例. 如
