企業如何打動員工的心？組織誘因構念與測量工具之發展 - 政大學術集成

全文

(1)不. 不工. 立. 政治大. 、. ‧ 國. 學. 心入. ‧. How to Attract Employees?. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. Construct and Measurement Tools Development of Organizational Inducements. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 中. 4. 4 DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(2) 心入. 34《. 水. 水. —. 心入心入. 心入月 .. —. 立. ‧ 國. 心入. 113 也. 心入心入. 4. 630. 主 7. al. 水反. n. .. 心入. 也 .. io. 代氏. .. 乏互；. 力. 不不. . .. 3 心入. y. 。. 水. 心. 政治大.. Nat. 201. 3. 。. ‧. 水. —. 心. 、. 學. 5. 2. 互.. 心工 2. . 力 .. 心入. 6. 心入. 心. ： . 4. 水少. 水. 不. C h4 U engchi 、. sit. 力. 心. 心心入. 女心. 13 大. 互；. 互；. 。. 止. 4. 己. .. er. 2. v ni. 也 .. 7. .. 4 13. 力. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(3) 六 4. 一工 . 4. 互 . 7. . 7. . 4. 心入. 7. 力. . 心入. . 政治. 大. 立. ‧ 國. 4. 3 . ‧. 2. 學. . Nat. . 7. 什允 a v. n. 2. er. io. sit. y. 4. i l C hengchi Un. 4. . 7. 代3 . 4. . 7. 代氏. 7. 2. 水反. 代3 . i. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(4) 4. . 7. 、心入. . 力. . ；. 代氏. . 政治. 水. 大立 . ‧ 國. 學. . ‧. . y. Nat. er. io. sit. . a. n. v l C 工 ni. hengchi U. 4. 工. 7. ； . 也力. ； . 心入. . . ii. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(5) 六心入. 代.. 4. 心入心入. 代氏. 力. . .. 7. . .. 7. . 心入. .. 力. 心入. 力. . . Nat. 心水. io. . n. al. 心入. 他介水. Ch. e n g六 chi. 4. i Un. v. . 六六 4. . ‧. 心入. . 學. .. 政治大. 力. 力立. 心入 .. . 心入. ‧ 國. .. 力. y. 心入. . sit. .. .. er. 水. 代氏. 六. ？ . 六 7. 4. ？ . 六. 7. ？ . iii. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(6) 4. 一工. 4. 互. 己. 切. 104 8. 工. 八. 8. 9—. 心. —. 8. .LinkedIn 己. 9. 入. 入 .. 102. 4《. 2. 3. .小. .久. .. 水. . .. 水政治大. 主. 立. 3. al. n. contract. io. 心入. 、. y. 心入水. 入. 心入. Nat. 、. 允. ‧. 。. 2. 乏. 學. 水少. 允. 6. ‧ 國. 》. ；. ，. 心月. sit. 。. ；. 尺. Ch. 4. engchi U. and breach. 心入 .psychological. er. 仍. 水. v ni. 月. —. .matching. .Rousseau, 1990;. 主. Freese & Schalk, 1996; Herriot, Manning, & Kidd, 1997; Porter, Pearce, Tripoli, & Lewis, 1998; Coyle-Shapiro & Kessler, 2000; Kickul & Lester, 2001; De Vos, Buyens, & Schalk, 2003; Zhao, Wayne, Glibkowski, & Bravo, 2007 organization relationship 心水. 入. —. 7. 心水. .employee-. 工.social exchange theory 乏. 心. 心. 乏. 。. .Tsui, Pearce, Porter, & Tripoli, 1997; Hom et al., 2009; Shin, Taylor, & Seo, 2012;. Hui, Lee, & Wang, 2015 心3 2. 3，. ，月. 尺. （. —. 尺乏月. 2 主. 1. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(7) —. 心水. 尺. 2. 心3. 心. 入. 乏.Tsui et al., 1998. 工。. 心入. 。. ，. 工. 心入. 尺. 6. 尺. 工. 心. 乏尺. 。. 心水. 不. 4. （. 心入. 心水. 心入. 4. 不. 水（. 心入. ，. 尺. ，工. 尺尺. .Rousseau, 1990; Tsui et al., 1997; Coyle-Shapiro. 心入. & Kessler, 2000; Kickul & Lester, 2001; De Vos, Buyens, & Schalk, 2003; Hom et al., 2009; Lambert, 2011; Lee et al., 2011 心入. ，. 立. ‧ 國. 心入. —. 心入. 心入. al. i 乏互；工 C hengchi Un. 心入予心入力. 心入. 9. —. 心水（. 心入. 互；. 工 .Rousseau, 1990; Tsui et al., 1997 ，. v. .expectation 心入. 、. Simon. 互3.Porter et al., 1998; Hui, Lee, & Wang, 2015. n. 工. March. sit. io. 7. 3. er. 2. Nat. .1958. 心. ‧. 心. Seo.2012. 學. .valued outcomes. 2. Shin Taylor. y. 9. 心入. 政治大. 尺. 2. 尺十3. 4 心入. 工代. 心入. .Kotter, 1973; Herriot, Manning & Kidd, 1997 之. 什允. 心入. 大. .Shin, Taylor, & Seo, 2012; Hui, Lee, & Wang, 2015. 之. 、.Freese & Schalk, 1996; Herriot, Manning, & Kidd, 1997; Porter. et al., 1998; De Vos, Buyens, & Schalk, 2003; Nikolaou, Tomprou, & Vakoola, 2007; Hom et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2011; George, Chattaopadhyay, & Ng, 2015. 、. 不. 2. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(8) 4 5. （. 心入. 心入（. 女. 、. 二. （. 心入. 尺. 工. —. 尺心入. 文. 尺. 力. 、心入. 心水. 。已. 心入 .Nikolaou, Tomprou & Vakoola,. 水. 2007; Hui, Lee, & Wang, 2015; Shin, Taylor, Seo, 2012; Porter et al., 1998; Lee et al., 2011; Rousseau, 1990; Tsui et al., 1997 2 2. 心入. 3. 3. 心. 力. —. 力. 月. 2. 3. ：. 2. 3. 之. 心心入. .2008. 代氏. 6. 4. y. sit. n. i Un. 之C Hinkin.1998. hengchi. 3. 尺.need fulfillment. 心入. scale development process 3. 心. 心. 力. al. .March 2. 力. er. io. 9. 。. .valued outcomes. Nat. 心入. 不. ‧. —. 互；. 互. ‧ 國. 6. 心入. 學. 心. 心. 尺. 政治大 & simon, 1958; Shin, Taylor, & Seo, 2012 心入立水. 心入. v. 。. 2. 2. 水反. 充.the. 代代. 4. 充3. 心入. 、友. 6 乃. 不. 心入. 予. 心入. 互；. 予. 心入心入. 心入. 乏. 力文. 充. 、. 、. 3. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(9) 7. 之. 4. 心入. （. 心入. 水. 4. 、. 允. 工. 心入. 7. 力. 心入互；. 心入. 之 Hinkin.1998 2 他介水. 立. .2008 2. .nomological network. 心入. 代、. 政治大學 ‧. io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 充3. 充3. ‧ 國. 4. 不. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 4. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(10) 7 之. 4. .organizational inducement 7. 之. 4. 心入. 力. .well-being. 乏. 心入心入. 充.the scale development process 3. 2. 代. 心入. .need fulfillment. 力. 互； 2. 水. 心入. 充3. .nomological network. 他介水. .job engagement. 心入政治大. 4. Simon.1958. 立. 三 2. 3.organizational inducement. 互3 Shin Taylor. .valued outcomes. 2. 3 .obligation. Ch. 心入. i U e n g（c h 心. 1996; Herriot, Manning, & Kidd, 1997. Seo.2012. 二. y. n. al. sit. io. 心. 心. er. 2. 2. —. Nat. 心入. 2. ‧. 9. 心3.Organization 4. 學. ‧ 國. 之 March. v ni. 3 入 .Freese & Schalk,. 不. 心入. ，. .Rousseau, 1990; Tsui, Pearce, Porter, & Tripoli, 1997; Coyle-. 也. Shapiro & Kessler, 2000; Kickul & Lester, 2001; De Vos, Buyens, & Schalk, 2003 心入. 2 。（. .. —. 工. 心入. 。. 心. 心入. 心水. 3 工. .Rousseau,. 1990; Tsui, Pearce, Porter, & Tripoli, 1997; Coyle-Shapiro & Kessler, 2000; Kickul & Lester, 2001; De Vos, Buyens, & Schalk, 2003; Hom et al., 2009; Lambert, 2011; Lee et al., 2011. 5. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(11) 水心. 心入. 不. 尺. Freese. 心入. Schalk.1996. 3.employer obligation. （. 65. .job content. 、. .opportunities for personal development. 互. .social aspect. 4 policy. 2. 8. .HRM. 己.rewards. Herriot Manning. Kidd.1997. 。. 6 12. 子.training 8—. 8. 口 .consult. 8. 己.rewards for performance. n. a. 互l. 3. 二. sit. 心入. y. ‧ 國. 2. 、. er. 之. io. 切. 63. 予. Nat. 8.1998. .security. 天 .pay. ‧. .benefits. .justice. .environment. 學. 4. 3. .fairness. 政治大二 .recognition 立. .humanity. 2. 力 .needs. 付.discretion. Porter. 心. Ch. development. engchi. i Un. v. . job/career growth. 天. .commitment to employee. 互. De Vos Buyens. Schalk.2003. 5. 2入. 互 .career development. 3. 付. .job content. .social atmosphere 己.financial reward. 、 8. 上 Nikoloau. 互. Tomprou. .work-life balance. Vakoola.2007. .retirement benefits security. 6 14. 2入. .health care benefits. .well-defined responsibilities. 3 .job. .a reasonable. 6. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(12) workload. .safe work environment. and interesting work decision making. 、. .meaningful work. .participation in. .freedom to be creative. .a. job that provides autonomy and control. 子.continual professional training. 主. 中 .career guidance and mentoring. 中 Lee. 8.2011 2. .challenging. .tuition reimbursement. 不. 68. 8. .friendly and fun work environment and challenging job. 天. 乃天. io. n. al. 乃. 12. 互 Taylor. Seo.2012. Chattopadhyay. development opportunities. 子互. 付. Wang.2015. 互. 8.2009 8. 公子互. v. .developmental rewards ni. engchi U. 心入. 主乏. 2. 心入. 互互. .sufficient power and responsibility 62. .perceived supervisor support. 》. 3. .training opportunities. 心入. 心入. Hom. Ng.2015 6 4. 心入. opportunities. Ch. 心入. y. 心水. 尺. ‧. 水. .materialistic rewards. 》. 心水. 心. Nat. 6，. —. 4. ‧ 國. 尺. .bonus based on. 之. 學. 6. George. .interesting. 政治大 .competitive pay 立. sit. 、. Shin. 3.. .good supervisor. er. performance. 、. .respect employees .pay tied to performance. 天. 心入. .collaborative work environment. 3. 之. 2. 2. .career. .promotion Hui Lee. 心入. 3. .participative decision making （. 心入. .Porter, Pearce, Tripoli, & Lewis, 1998; Shin, Taylor, & Seo, 2012; Hui, Lee, & Wang, 2015. （. 心入 7. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(13) 心入 Freese. 9. 之. 心入. Schalk.1996 Porter. 也. .social aspect. 4 主. .Lee et al., 2011; Nikoloau, Tomprou,. 中. & Vakoola, 2007. （心入. 、. 心入. 8.1998. .. 入. 9. 什允. 4. 心入、. 代. 也. 允. 也. 乏. 心. 心入. 6. 、. 心入. 、. .Freese & Schalk, 1996; Herriot, Manning, & Kidd, 1997; Porter et al., 1998; De Vos, Buyens, & Schalk, 2003. 政治大. 立. 2. 3 9. 3. 2. 3月. ，. 心入. 心3. n. a. 心入. y. 心3 2. er. ‧ 國. 2. 2. io. .leadership. 4. ‧. Nat. 中. 心入. 學. 水. 心入. sit. 心入. 8. 。. 心. v. .Nikolaou, Tomprou, &l Vakoola, 2007; Hui,n iLee, & Wang, 2015 C 力. 2. hengchi U. 3—. 2：. 心入. —. 2. 3. 7. 心入. 士3.Shin, Taylor, Seo, 2012; Porter, Pearce,. Tripoli, & Lewis, 1998; Hui, Lee, & Wang, 2015 2. 士3. 心. （. ，. 4. 5. 心. 心. 心入. 心入. 4. 。. .Lee et al., 2011 入. 升. 工. 尺—. .expectation. —. 心水. 尺. 心. 心入. .Rousseau,. 1990; Tsui et al., 1997 心入心. 月. 2. 3. 心. 2 2. 3. 3 力. —. 8. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(14) ：. 2. 3. 力. 4 心. 心入. 6. 心入. 2. 互.. 心. 心. 。. 水. .. .valued outcomes. 乃. .. 心. — 3. 心入. .. 心入心入 4. 心入. 心入心入. —. .Rousseau, 1990; Tsui et al., 1997 5. 立 Deci.2000. n. al. Ch. 心入. 。. engchi. 3. （. 心入. 互 2 心入. 2. 心. v. 水. 、. 心. 6. — 。、. Robbins. 互.motivation. Judge.2013. 心. .organizational. 4. 3. 、. 心入. 心入. 以. 十。. i Un. 心. 乏 .March & Simon, 1958 behavior 4. 心入. 力. 心. 心入. 工. 力 .basic psychological need. io. 互. 心入. .need fulfillment. 力. 7. 之. 6. y. Nat. 之。. 工. 2. ‧. Ryan. 7. 心入. 學. 心入. ‧ 國. 十3. （. 政治大. sit. 心水. er. —. 心入. 互二. 力. 心入（. 力互. 工. Ryan. 9. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(15) Deci.2000. 工.self-determination theory. 五 .innate psychological process 4. 8. 工（，. 互.self-motivation .external regulation. 乏. 8. （. 以. 干. 7. （. 以. Ryan & Deci, 1991; Sheldon, Ryan, Rawsthorne, & Ilardi, Deci.1997 二. 8. 、. .exploration. .spontaneous interest （. 互. al. 。. 6力. n 工。二. .competence. Ch. 互. 互；. 乏. v. .tasks ni. engchi U. .autonomy ，. 二》. 力 .basic psychological need. （ 8. 6. 力. 8 9力互以. 力 Ryan. Deci.2000. .social growth. 力（. 心. y. 工.sub-theory 互二》. 二. 工.cognitive evaluation theory. 二》. io. 工. 4. ‧ 國. Ryan.1985. 立. Nat. Deci. 政治大 .Ryan & Deci, 2000. ‧. —. 水. 互. 互. 心. 以. 學. 入. .mastery 以. 互. .individual —. .assimilation. 二》. 互.intrinsic motivation 十. 以 .evolved propensity. sit. Ryan Kuhl. er. 1997. 力. 主 .relatedness. 力. .need fulfillment. 8. 乏互. 6. 9力。. 互. 力 10. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(16) 。. 力. 。互.extrinsic motivation. 互 Koestner, & Ryan, 1999. （. 互. 互. 互. 4. .Deci, 1975; Deci,. ） .La Guardia, Ryan,. 力. Couchman, & Deci, 2000 二. 心入. 力. 力. 子； .Freese & Schalk,. 心入. 1996; Herriot, Manning, & Kidd, 1997; Nikoloau, Tomprou, & Vakoola, 2007 入. （. 心心入. 。. .Porter et al., 1998; De Vos,. 4. 政治大 Buyens, & Schalk, 2003; Lee et al., 2011 心入立 ‧ 國. 乏互；. al. n. 4. （心. iv — 心水， n 尺 C hengchi U 水. 3 水 .. 心. 工 2. 3. 3. 尺. 2. .. —. 心水. 9. 已. 力. 3 2. 十，. 心. 力 2. 。. 心入十. （，. 心入. 心入. 心入 2. 5. .Tsui et al., 1997. 乏. 力. （. er. 心入. y. 心. sit. （. io. 力. 升. .Freese & Schalk, 1996; Lee et al., 2012; Hui, Lee, & Wang,. 4. 心入. 心. Nat. 2015. 心. ‧. 。. （. 學. 心入. 7. 心. 心入. 心入 3. 互 5. 力. 心入. 。. 7. 工. 氏. 力. 乏.White, 1963; deCharms, 1968; Deci, 1975; Reis,. 1994; Baumeister & Leary, 1995. 工. 代氏. 心氏. 代氏力. 11. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(17) 乏.Harter, 1978; Ryan & Grolnick, 1986; Vansteenkiste et al., 2007;. 不. Schreurs, van Emmerik, Van den Broeck, & Guenter, 2014; Yousaf, Yang, & Sanders, 2015 代氏（代心入. 。. 水. 心入. 力. 4. 水. 心入. 心入. 4 入. 工力. 6. 立. 心入. （ 4. 文. .confirmatory factor analysis. .5. iv item reduction n C.initial hengchi U. 2. .2008 代. .2. 充3 。. .item generation. .internal structure. .4 .stability. 代. 4 代. .6. .7 他介水. ？. .questionnaire. .4. 代氏. .convergent/discriminant validity. 了.replication 1. .2. er. al. n. .3. 、. sit. .item generation. 代. io. .1. administration. validity. 之 Hinkin.1998. y. Nat. 充. explication. 6. ‧. 、. 氏. 充.the scale development process 3. 2. 氏. 。. 學. ‧ 國. 代. 政治大心入》. 、. 、、. .6. 心入氏. （. 心. 心入. 心入. 不. 6. 力. 乏、. 7. 0. 心. .1. .content validity. .3. 代 .5. .construct. 4. .convergent validity. .internal consistency .discriminant. .nomological network. 充. 。. ，不. 尺. .Brown, Trevino,. & Harrison, 2005; Ferris, Brown, Berry, & Lian, 2008; Walumbwa, Avolio, Gardner, Wernsing, & Peterson, 2008; Djurdjevic et al., 2017. ；. 2. 4. 12. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(18) 3 2. 7. 代氏. 3. 2. 水反. Nunnally.1978. 也、 .3. 工. 氏代. 4. .1. .empirically 。. 水. .Hinkin, 1998. 心入. 1998;. 2008. 代.Hinkin,. Hinkin.1998. 工. 二. ，. 之. （. 2. 工 3.inductive. 水. 比.deductive. 心入. —. 六 6 6. Nat. Richard, & Kubany, 1995. 代. .2008. 工 3 .Haynes,. ‧. 代. 立. 政治大 .Schwab, 1980. 學. 2. 不. ‧ 國. 心入. 比3 .deductive. —. 2 心入. 4. 代. sit. 7. 代氏. y. 止. 止 .2. 代3. er. io. .Schriesheim, Powers, Scandura, Gardiner, & Lankau, 1993; Anderson & Gerbing, 1991;. a. n. v. l C MacKenzie, Podsakoff, & Fetter, 1991; Schriesheim & Hinkin, n i 1990; Hinkin & Tracey, 1999 Stone . 1978. 二. 不. hengchi U. .quantitative index 工. 4. （ .Hinkin, 1998. （ Schriesheim. 4. 允. ） .item sorting task. 8.1993. 心入. （. 力. 心入. 代代心. 75%. 入. 代.Hinkin, 1985; Hinkin,. 心入 1998; MacKenzie, Podsakoff, & Fetter, 1991 7 13. 氏心入. 代. 心入. 代氏. 心入. 止 13. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(19) Hinkin.1998. .2008. factor analysis 3 2代氏. 代. .2008. 心入 4. 2. 代. 心入. 之. .2008. 0. 1. 2他介水. （. 代. 代. 不. 他介水中. 立. .. 心入. 。. y. 2. Ch 心. 心入. engchi. iv 力 n U. 水. 3 5. 水反. 心. 心. Deci.2000. 水反. sit. a. 心 2. 工. 心入. n. 之. 乏. （. 互；l. 力. 3.. .Djurdjevic et al., 2017. 心. io. 他介水. 心. Nat. 下. .. （ 2. ‧. 下. 水. 5. ‧ 國. 心入. 3. 政治大 3.水反. 2. 水. 學. （. —. 心. er. 工. .uni-dimensionality 3. .nomological networking. 水 .Cronbach & Meehl, 1955 氏. 心入. .Gerbing & Anderson, 1988. 工. 他介水. 代. 代氏. 工. 代. .exploratory. .confirmatory factor analysis 3. 之 6. 2. 水. 6. 互. —. 3 。. 心入. 之 Ryan. 力. 力. 水. 8. 互. 之力. 水. .need fulfillment. 工. 他介水. .. 1. 水. 4. 力氏. 力. .job engagement 心入. 心入. 工. 代. 2008. 6. 8. 水反. 水力. .Deci & Ryan, .well-being. 心入. 14. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(20) 心入. ，. Schaufeli. 二》. 8.2002. y. sit. 二. al. n 工代. 氏C. 水反. 二. 心入. hengchi. 9 二. er. io. 6. 一. .resource. Nat. （. .work-role. ‧. 3. 立. ‧ 國. 2. 政治大 Kahn.1990 學. 二. 他介水. 24 3. （. .burnout. iv 允 n U. 已. ；二. .vitality. 。. ；. .Ryan & Deci, 2008. 力. 尺 .Deci & Ryan, 2000. 9. 氏. 乏 .Deci et al.,. 力. 2001; Schreurs, van Emmerik, Van den Broeck, & Guenter, 2014; Jowett, Hill, Hall, & Curran, 2016. 1 1. 心入. 力. 乏 15. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(21) 2 .Ryan & Frederick, 1997 。. 工. 代. Ryan. Deci.2000. 水反. 工. 水. 6 ，. 不. .Ryan & Deci, 2001. 氏 2. 代. 及. 不. .Ryan, Sheldon, Kasser, & Deci, 1996. ‧ 國. 代。. 9. .Ryan & Frederick, 1997. er. io. sit. y. Nat. .energizing state 氏. 水 .Deci & Ryan, 2002. 政治大付. ‧. 心入. 立. 3. 學. 8. 已. 3. ， /. 2 力. 心入. .Kahneman,. .fully functioning. 工. 二. .hedonic. 2. .Ryff & Stinger, 1998. 氏. （. .happiness 3. Diener, & Schwaz, 1999 .eudainomic. 3. n. a. 力. v. l C Ryan, Reis, 1996; .Sheldon, n i Reis, Sheldon, Gable, Roscoe,. hengchi U. & Ryan, 2000 2. 2. 心入. 力. 乏. 16. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(22) 2. 4. 3. 4. 比水少. 心入. 工. organizational inducements. 心入. 工. 水. 心入. 不. 心入. .Shin,. Taylor, & Seo, 2012; Hui, Lee, & Wang, 2015 psychological contract. 9 不. 水少. 分不. PsycARTICLES.EBSCOhost. 。. JSTOR ProQuest. ESBCOhost. Nature. Sage. 不. Google Scholar 、— 大. 三. 心入. 13. 什允. 治. .Rousseau, 1990;政 Robinson, Kraatz, 大 & Rousseau, 1994; Freese &. 主. 立. Schalk, 1996; Herriot, Manning, & Kidd, 1997; Porter et al., 1998; Rousseau, 2000; Kickul &. ‧ 國. 學. Lester, 2001; De Vos, Buyens, & Schalk, 2003; Wang et al., 2003; Nikolaou, Tomprou, & 13 大. 水. 、. y. Nat. 心入. . 150. .statement. er. io. 中.authentic leadership a. n. 比 iv l C n U hengchi 三工. 心入入 4. .. 六 Walumba. sit. 2015. ‧. Valoola, 2007; Hom et al., 2009; Geourge, Chattaopadhyay, & Ng, 2015; Hui, Lee, & Wang,. 中. .. 4. ）. 7. .. 支 16. .item. Hinkin.1998. 4. 8.2008. 三引. 心元. ）. 什允. Hinkin.1998. .item sorting task. 代 16. .content validity .Schriesheim et al., 1993. 心入？ 16 水. .. 六4. 心入. 心入心. 心入 6. 互. 。. —. 心心入. 17. .2. 心心. 3. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(23) 也也. 也代. Djurdjevic et al., 2017 也. 水. 也. —. 47. 。. 65 1. ‧ 國. 心入. y. n. 升. Ch. engchi. 心入. i Un. v. 不不. 也. 不不. 也. 不. 2 付3 3 （. 代. 也. 7. 之. 二 4. 代. 心入. 32. 、. 允. 心入、. 心. 心入. 、。. 心入. 心入代 …. …3. 2. 、 3 2. 13. ‧. io. 不不a l 也. 不. 2. 付3.71.68%. 16. 工. …. 13. 3.62.83%. 心入. 心入. 心入. 13. 21.16. 心入. 4. （，. 代. 48. 且. 學. 16. 32 13. 友. 2. Nat. 之 13 大 113. 3. 」. 不. 2 治政大. 立 3.64.60%. 、. 互3.motivation. 也. 16. & Fetter, 1991. 4. 不. .Schriesheim et al., 1993; Hinkin, 1985; MacKenzie, Podsakoff,. 什允. 升. 代. 15. 之. 也. 也. 66. 也. 水. 不. 不. —. 不 98. 心 2. Facebook 不、. 也. 75%. 不. 也. 入. .. .Ferris, Brown, Berry, & Lian, 2008;. 也. 也. 心入也. 113. 、. 也. sit. 不. 中. ，. 也. /升. 8. er. 不不. 8.2012. 付3 。. 女。心入. 心入. 18. 水反中. 62 《. 。. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(24) 代. ；. 6. 3. 手. 13. 心入. 01. 心入. 代.. 主. .. 80.53. 二. 76.99. 03. 心. 77.88. 互. 04. 76.11 a. 62.83. 06 升. .... .. 」. 方. 切. n. 14 15 16. al. 子互 a. Ch. n engchi U. 82.30. iv. 87.61 82.30 86.73 71.68. 付 a. 76.11 76.11. er. io. .. 仍. sit. Nat. 12. 天. 81.42. ‧. ‧ 國. .. 64.60. 學. ：. 11. 13. .立. 水. 83.19. 政治大. y. a. 09 10. 82.30. 水. 07 08. 代. 4. 02. 05. 主. 75%. 代. 19. 心入. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(25) 2. 7. 代3. 4. 也心入. （. （. 心入. 心入. 三 13. ？. 6. （. 心入 6. 1203 也 .84. 不. 三. 也. 心入. IP. 也. 立. 代氏. 治4. 也. 大 213. 28.46. 7. 100. 215. y. sit. er. io. v .principal-components methods ni. n. al. Ch. engchi U. .Ford et al., 1986; Rummel, 1970 入. ， 53.140%. 11.438%. 13. 4 0.40. 心入. 代. 2 .. 3. 心. 1.487 （ 0.602. .Ford et al., 1986 0.488. 3. 」. 13. 心入. 代. （-0.453. 72 6.908. .eigenvalues. 0.804 13. 代氏. ‧. 7. Nat SPSS. 予. 102. ‧ 國. 且. 也. 學. 也. .10 也. ？. 政 .Krzystofiak, Cardy, & Newman, 1988 29.85. 也. 才 630. 之 315. 且. 也 .42. 也 .18. Hinkin.1998. 三. 19. 也 .39. .211. 內. ，. 也. 也 .169. 三. — 13. 也. 》. 7 0.40. ， 0.488 （. 2 （1. 工. .Cattell, 1966. 20. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(26) 心入. 01. .. .. 7. 二. 02 03. 心. 互. 04 05. 水. 06 . ： .. 09. 切. 天. 10. .. 仍. 政治大」. 立. .. 12 13. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 子互. Nat. io. 代氏. al. n. SPSS. 予 3. 13. ..000. 618.135. CFI.comparative fit index. approximation 0.90. Ch. 心入. .CMIN. Browne. .393. .689. .488. .655. .284. .685. .287. .746. .147. .602. -.022. .703. .171. .734. -.154. .665. -.227. .723. -.453. .728. -.381. .804. -.224. .740. -.218. y. 11. .... 方. .699. sit. 08. 水. 7. er. 07. 4. AMOS. engchi. i v 代氏 n U （ 0.628. 0.831. .degree of freedom 0.807. 0.165 水（. 65. p. RMSEA.root mean square error of. 代. Cudeck.1993. 之. RMSEA. Hinkin.1998 二（ 0.10. CFI. （. 代氏. 代. 21. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(27) 心入. 代氏. .. 7 CFA. 01. .. .698. 二. 02. .672. 03. 心. .628. 互. 04. .697 水. 05. .774. 06. ： .. 09. 方切. 天. 立. 仍政治大」. .790. ‧ 國子互. io. .728. CMIN. n. al. .831. y. Nat. 13. .787. ‧. 12. .777. 學. .. .726. .... .. 10 11. .756. .. sit. 08. 水. 618.135 65 .000***. er. 07. .625. Ch. n engchi U. iv. df p CFI RMSEA. 0.807 0.165. 7. 7. 315. 也. 代氏（1. ，. 13 .Cattell, 1966 代. Browne & Cudeck, 1993. .CFI. 13. 0.807 RMSEA. 0.40. 22. 2 代. 2 .. 。. 心入. 0.165 .Hinkin, 1998; 7. 0.488 -0.453. 心入. 代氏. 之. 3. 3.. 315. 也. 」. （ 0.40.Ford et. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(28) al., 1986 13. 二. （. 4. 代. 心入. 4. 7. 水水. 二。. 互人. 友. 13. 心入. .latent variable. 心入. 0.40 代. 代 13. 4. .13. 心入. .Ford et al., 1986 心入. ，. 4. 13. 二. 4. 心入. （ —. 4. 主. 4. 治心入大. 主代氏政 13. 立. 學 ‧. ‧ 國 io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 心入. ，. ，. 之代氏. 心入. ，. Ch. engchi. 23. i Un. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(29) 2. 水反. Hinkin.1998 fulfillment. 乏互；. .2008. 力. .nomological network. 他介水. 力. 代3. 代氏 13. 心入. .job engagement. 乏水反. .well-being. .need. 心入. 4. 13. 心入. 》. 心入. 」，. ？. （. 入. —. 心入. 》. . .. 立，. 化.ostracism. 4 六7. 7. 治六政大. （ Ferris. 4. 力. 8.2008. ，. ‧ 國. 學. .common method variance .Dillman, 2000; Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, & Podsakoff,. 32.18. 心入. 7. SPSS. 予水. 水.correlation 4. .. 69. 132 54.04. 代. 代氏 .reliability. 代氏予. SPSS. .average variance extracted, AVE. .model comparison. 力. 也也. 2008. AMOS. SPSS. 114. 。. a l 60 iv 不 129 n Ch engchi U. n. 12 氏. 且. 也. 尺. y. 也. 7. sit. 也也. 也. 201. io. 87. 也. Nat. 內. 360. er. 4. ‧. 2003. 代. PROCESS. 心入. 。代. 心入. 乏. 24. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(30) 7. ？. 、. 、. 心入. 。. ；. 心. 6. 代. 、. 不. 月. 心入. 水 6. 互. 心入。. —. 》 2. 代氏心 4. Deci.2000. 3. 力. y. 3. al. 4. 2. er. 4. n. .. 尺. io. 3. 2. ‧. ‧ 國. Couchman. Nat. 2. 力. 己. 學. Ryan. 力 .. 力. 心. 政治大. 立. 2. （. 尺. 3. 3. 3. 心入. La Guardia. 水. 心. 心入. 力. 心. 心心入. 13. 2. sit. 心. 心入. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 力 1. 2. 3.. （；. 元. .. 4.. .. 5. 6. 7. 8.. 8 。. 8. 水. . 「. 水. 9.. 25. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(31) Schaufeli. 8.2002. 24 3. 9 2. 尺 3. .. 1.. 4. 2. 3. 5. 友. 6. 2. 3. 4. 5.. 友. 6.. 立. 8. 9.. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 7.. 政治大. er. io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. Ryan. ni Ch Frederick.1997 U engchi. 代. 2. 5. 1.. 3. 2. 3. 2. Diener Emmons Larsens. 3. .1985. v. 尺 .. Griffin. 4. 6. 「. 2. 3. 4. 5.. 十. 26. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(32) ；. 。. 乏. 且. 8. 9. .. ；. 代氏. Hinkin.1998 AMOS. 。. 工.Cattell, 1966. 0.793. 0.782 立. （ 0.10. RMSEA. 水. .r = 0.231 p < 0.01 二 0.828. 之. （. p. y. sit. er. 且人.similar to me bias. 心入. 水心入. .α = 0.949 、. 65. 代. .r = 0.256 p < 0.001. 力. 心入 .CFI. v i. l C 8 n hengchi U 心入. .Brown, Trevino & Harrison, 2005 水。. 13. 代. 0.095. 心入 a. 8. n. .. io. 之. （1. 6. .. 13. 4. 185.162. Nat. 水. 4. （. .CMIN. ‧ 國. 0.903. 心入. 50.147%. 政治之大. 心入. ‧. CFI. ..000. 13. 學. RMSEA. 7. 7. 代氏. （ 0.605 0.90. .. 6.519. .eigenvalues （ 0.632. 代 13. 代氏之. 心入. SPSS. .replication 代氏. .r = 0.236 p < 0.01 乏互； .α = 0.916 .α = 0.834. 力. 4 .α =. 力、. 4. 27. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(33) 心入. 01. 代氏. .. .. 二. 02 03. 心. 互. 04 06. 水. 07 . ：切. 12. 14. .. 立. ‧. 15. .. 政」治大學. 13. 天. 仍. 子互. Nat. CMIN. io. sit. 11. .... 方. y. .. df. Ch. .746. .714. .665. .627. .717. .687. .632. .592. .774. .757. .665. .634. .769. .746. .635. .605. .700. .661. .660. .617. .688. .650. .738. .719. .793. .782 185.162 65 0.903. RMSEA. 0.096. engchi. 28. CFA. i pv n UCFI. n. al. er. 10. 水. ‧ 國. 09. EFA. .000. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(34) 8 3.. 5.. 治-.039 大. .017. (.916). .059. .256***. (.828). .103. .236**. .806***. (.949). .136. .231**. .510***. .625***. 1.. a. 1.66. 0.48. 2.. b. 2.60. 0.61. .055. 3.. 32.18. 7.70. .021. -.291***. 4.. 54.04. 60.82. .057. -.244**. 5.. 3.95. 0.83. -.052. 政 .053. 3.96. 0.68. -.099. .067. -.037. 7.. 3.92. 0.92. -.087. .051. .051. 8.. 3.53. 0.84. -.010. .051. .046. 2= 1=. sit. p < .001. al. n. b. 1=. ***. io. a. p < .01. Nat. **. 2=. 3=. (.834). er. 8. 9.. .687***. 學. 6.. 立. 6.. 7.. 4.. ‧ 國. 2.. ‧. 1.. y. Ch. n engchi U. iv. cronbach’s alpha. 29. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(35) ６. SPSS. ；. AMOS. 木. ６. 7. 」. = 0.917. = 0.950. g. = 0.850. 0.460 c〈. 13. @. ６ r2 = 0.066. 一 r2 = 0.053. = 0.056 0.508. m. ６. c〈. 、. 」乃. 0.850. 六. = 0.645. RMSEA = 0.116 RMSEA. 一. e上 3. 上. al. ６ 4. Ch. engchi. 今〈. e上. i Un. v. AMOS 1140.687. 8》. 」 588 CFI. 0.877 RMSEA. 4. e. 3. e CFI = 0.711. RMSEA = 0.105. 2. CFI = 0.613. RMSEA = 0.121. @升. 4. 4. e. e. m. e 1. ；. Brown & Cudeck, 1993 e. e上 e. @. er. 士. 〈 0.10. e 2. 0.508. 0.510***. 1. 內. 0.625***. 0.231**. n. e. 0.391. 0.806***. 木. m. 0.681. 0.236**. CMIN. 0.069@. 0.260. 0.390. SPSS. e. 0.650. 0.256***. io. 4. 0.053. 0.066. ６. ；. 0.056. 0.460. y. 4.. 4.. sit. 0.950. ‧ 國. 3. g. 3.. ‧. 0.835. 乃. @. 學. 2.. 一g. 政治g 大 2.. 立1.. Nat. 0.917. 〈. 一g. ６. ave. 互@. 、互. 1.. ave =. 一. ６. r2. g. ave = 0.681. g. 一 = 0.390. = 0.835. e CFI e. ６乃. ；. @. 30. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(36) g /. e上 T. *. 4. RMSEA. .877. .069. 4. e. 1140.687. 588. 3. e. 1889.174. 591. 249.496***. .711. .105. 2. e. 2186.851. 593. 209.233***. .645. .116. 1. e. 2335.574. 594. 199.148***. .613. .121. e. 3. g. T T. CFI. 2. e g 1. e. e. e. e. 一. 一. 》. T. g. e@. ls. 」. 月. 天. 」. 0.211. ls 1. 」. 0.115. 0.364 m. n. 」. 乃. s〈 0.080. al. Ch. p = .090. 友. β = 1.077. 」. io. 一. outcome variable. Nat. ls. 」. g. p = .445. 」. m. p = .000. ‧. ‧ 國. 一. ；. 學. β = 0.196 p = .000 @. 立. 」. 9 10 政治大一. e n乃g c h i. s〈 0.040. 2. 31. i Un. 0.214 m g. g. @. er. ？. 2@. ls. y. 1. 》. PROCESS. 木. 」. sit. SPSS. ；. v. 」. β = 0.588 p = .000. @. 」 @. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(37) ls. g β. S.E.. t. p. 3.449. 0.446. 7.737. .000. 0.196***. 0.056. 3.502. .000. 」. 」上. ls. g. -0.875. 0.423. -2.068. .040. 0.037. 0.048. 0.766. .445. 1.077***. 0.059. 18.115. .000. ls. 」. S.E.. LLCI (95%). ULCI (95%). 0.211***. 0.072. 0.080. 0.364. 95%. Bootstrapping = 10,000. 政治月大. ？. 立 ‧ 國. β. S.E.. p. 0.446. 7.737. y. .000. 0.196***. 0.056. 3.502. .000. er. al. n. ls. t. 3.449. io. 上. @. ‧. 」. Nat. 上. 學. ls. 天. sit. 上. 0.454. 」 C. hengchi 0.558. i Un. v. 0.814. .416. 0.108. 0.063. 1.702. .090. 0.588***. 0.078. 7.504. .000. ls. 」. S.E.. LLCI (95%). ULCI (95%). 0.115***. 0.044. 0.040. 0.214. 95%. Bootstrapping = 10,000 ？. 月. 32. 天. @. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(38) ；. 201. ；. 天. 1. g. 3. 2 4. ６ l. T. ； T. T. ；. l. 》. g. ６@. ；. ；. ；. Hinkin, 1998; 13. 》. ；七. ６. 一. ；. ；. 》. 升. 立. —. ） @. 學. ；. 一. y g. v ６ ni. n. al. ；七. Ch. 一g. 、. engchi U. —. 互. c〈. m. m. ６. Podsakoff et al., 2003 l Ford et al., 1986. c〈. @. u. 》. 一. T. l. 〈. 0.309. Harrison 一 McLaughlin 1991. 一g T. T. ６. @. sit. m. T. er. io. @. u. ‧. 」乃. 、. g. ！. Nat. ；. 互@. 0.258. 0.282. 乃. ２. Hinkin, 1998. ６ l 4. 1993. ；. 一. 」. ‧ 國. ６. Walumbwa et al., 2008. 〈. 一. 入. 政也心治（大. l. l. 〈—. @. 》. ６. @. ；. T. 七. 0.40. 」一. m @. ；》. 〈 0.10. e. 」天. RMSEA ；. ls. c〈 1 Cattell, 1966. 三. CFI c〈 0.90 Brown & Cudeck, 1993 @. 5. CFI ６. RMSEA i. e 內c〈 0.90 3. e. 內. 〈 0.10. Hinkin, 1998 2. e. 33. 1. e. @. @. Brown & Cudeck, m. 一. CFI 一 RMSEA. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(39) @ T. 4. ；七. e. m》. ；. 」６. 4. T. 」乃. e. l. ls. 36. 上. 」. 1. u. ；》. c@. — 2. g 乃 l. 立. 及. Ryan & Deci, 2000. @. 政治大學 ‧. ‧ 國 io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. @. ６. Ch. engchi. 34. i Un. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(40) ；；３. ２. 一. g. m. ；. ；. 乃. ；. T u. T. ；. @. ；. 2. u. T. 內. 》乃. ；. ２. ；. g @ ２. 支. ；. g. l. @. T. — c. 方. z. ２. 治 Tsui et al., 1997 Rousseau, 政 1990;. 立u. 大. @. 大. —. 方什. 小. 學. ‧ 國. l. 1. g. g. ；. ；. 支. ；. 一. g. 3. g. ２. T. Freese & Schalk, 1996; Herriot, Manning, & Kidd, 1997; Shin, Taylor, & Seo, 2012 Lee et al., 2011; Hui, Lee, & Wang, 2012. ３. u m》. ３. y. ；. 、. March 一 Simon 1958. ； 2015. 〈. @. ３. a l３ i v 1996; Porter et al., 1998 @ n C h Freese & Schalk, engchi U. n. ；. 士一. er. c. io. u. u. sit. Nat. Nikolaou, Tomprou, & Vakoola, 2007. g. g. ‧. ！. 《. 心. Porter et al., 1998; Hui, Lee, & Wang, Shin, Taylor, & Seo, 2012. ；. ；. Rousseau, 1990; Tsui et al., 1997; Coyle-Shapiro &. 、. Kessler, 2000; Kickul & Lester, 2001; De Vos, Buyens, & Schalk, 2003; Hom et al., 2009; Lambert, 2011; Lee et al., 2011 ；u. ，. ；才. 木〈. g. 一. g. g. @ 一. @. g. 《及. ；. l 一. g. （方. T g. 》. 35. n. ３《. 」. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(41) @. 〈. T. T. u. 一 l. ；. @. —. ；@ i. ２. 〈. 了. g. T. 〈. ；. ；. g Herriot, Manning, & Kidd,. g. 1997; Lee et al., 2011, Shin, Taylor, & Seo, 2012; Hui, Lee, & Wang, 2015 ３ 1997. 乃. g. ２. z 內. n. —. ；. ；. g. al. g 13 201. ；. 113. 支天. g @. Ch. ；i. engchi. c. 」. v i才 n U. @. ；. 630. ；T. g. ２. ２. y. 一. n. ２. ；. 乃. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. ２. io. 中一. ２. u @. Nat. 〈. m. Ryan 一 Deci 2000. T. ；. 上. g. —. ；. Rousseau, 1990; Freese & Schalk, 1996; Herriot, Manning, &. Hinkin 2008. T @. m. g. ；. Kidd, 1997; Porter, et al., 1998; Rousseau, 2000; Kickul & Lester, 2001 13. ；. u. ； @. e 天. ；. ；T 13. —. 乃. g. ；. g. @. 文 @治政大. 立〈. g. ；. mT. g４. @. sit. Tsui. —. ；七. er. m》. @. 1998 m. ；. ；》. m. 一. c g. 及m. 引 u. 36. ５ t 子. 什. 小. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(42) 天. …. g. u. 」m. 內. ；. ；. ；》. @. ；》. g. ；m. 〈. — ６. 〈. g. ；. 〈. ；. ６. 13. ３. u. 子. g g. l. s. ６. @. g. m. io. . g. . g. . Ch. . g. g. i Un. v. e n g c h i g. g . g. . g. ２ . . 七. y. al. ２. n. g. ４. ６. ；. . ；. 政治大. Nat. ２. @. T. @. ‧. ‧ 國. ；. 一. . . ２. . g g. ；. 學. 方. ６；》. ；. 立. ；一. ６. g. sit. ２；. ２. 內一. —. 及. ６. ２. g. ２. T. ；一. ２. er. @. 升. ；. g一. ２. 少. g 13. 13. —. 不 g. g g. . g. 37. g. g ３. g. ３. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(43) 方. l 〈. 一. l@. w. CSR. 二. 》. @ 內. ３. @. l. 一. 內 Hinkin. 1998. g. 》. n. 一. Ch. 2008. ；. engchi. T. ；. 木. i Un. 》 @. @. m convergent validity. 六六. 《. 互. Walumba. 一. authentic leadership 互. v. Hinkin 1998. discriminant validity m. 互. 2008. ethical leadership ；l. 〈. 一. 木〈. leadership. 一. 」. 內. inducement @. u. sit. n. al. ；一. g. er. io. 才. 13. @. y. Nat. @. 一. ２. 》. —. 13. ５. 13. ；. ；. ‧. g. m. 學. u. 立」. ；. 方. ‧ 國. —. @. 政治大. Ryan 一 Deci 2000 @. @. 》. g T. ；七. ２. 13. ；. 」. …. g. 內. ；. T. 一. CSR. m》. 《. g. 方 @升. 一. 今. g. l. @. g. 互. @. l》《. ；. 38. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(44) 互. @. Walumba. ；. ６. 乃. m. 2008. 互. 一. ；》. ６@ 一. 2008. 一」 @. ；升. m 內. n. ； g. Ryan & Deci, 2000. 」」 @. 乃. ；. ；七. g. @. ；. ；. 方. 〈. 一. ；. z. @. 一立. 〈. a lu Ch. n. m ；. 《g. e n；g c h方i. i Un. ；. ；七. ；. ２. g @ 》. ；. l. 〈. 3. ６；. 」l. ）》. ；. ；. ；. T. ；. 心. t. ；. ； 13. @. g ；. v；」. u. 」l e. ；u. @. 16. ；. @. sit. io. g氏 T. 才. y. Nat. 已. T. ‧. 〈. g. er. @. c. 學. u. ；. ‧ 國. ；T. 政治大. ６. ；. 」. T @. ；. 方. 內. @. 39. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(45) 一. 13. ；. T. u T. Ryan 一 Deci 2000. @ 內. ；. u. 一. 一. —. ，〈. Deci & Ryan, 1985 @. Ryan 一 Deci 2000. m @一m. ２. ； 13. u. 一. ３. T. 」. 乃. e. extrinsic. Vakoola 2007. @Lee. ；l. n. a l factor analysis EFA exploratory iv. Ch. —. 〉. ；. g. @. Ryan 一 Deci 2000 》. u. 》. transactional 一；. ；i. ２. 2011. ３. T 友 @. 乃. l. n e n— gchi U. relational @ 〈 T. ２. @Kickkul 一 Lester. er. io. Nikoloau Tomprou. @. ‧. intrinsic 一. u. 13. ；. Nat. 2001. g—. @. 政治大. ；. 方. ２. 學. 《一. 立. ；. ‧ 國. 一. ；. 一. m. t. ；. @ 〈. y. 下. T. T. 內. sit. ；. 》. 、. 一及. ；. 方m. 一. @. 40. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(46) 支 2008. @. ２. @. ２. 2012 @. 元 @. 一. 29. ２. 4. l. ；己. @ :. 307-331@. https://doi.org/10.6504/JOM.2012.29.04.01 2013. 2013. @. @. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1991). Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. Journal of applied psychology, 76(5), 732. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.732 Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 政治. 大. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). 立 Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage focus. ‧ 國. 學. editions, 154, 136-136. Doi: N/A. Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning. ‧. perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational behavior and human. sit. y. Nat. decision processes, 97(2), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002. er. io. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral. n. al Research, 1, 245-276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 iv. n. C. h e n g c h i Uof the psychological contract for the Coyle‐Shapiro, J., & Kessler, I. (2000). Consequences employment relationship: A large scale survey. Journal of management studies, 37(7), 903-930. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00210 Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological bulletin, 52(4), 281-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0040957 deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. New York: Academic Press. Doi: N/A. Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum. Doi: N/A. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-668. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum. Doi: N/A.. 41. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(47) Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. Handbook of self-determination research, 3-33. Doi: N/A. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian psychology / Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 182-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012801 Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 27(8), 930-942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201278002 De Vos, A., Buyens, D., & Schalk, R. (2003). Psychological contract development during organizational socialization: Adaptation to 治 reality and the role of reciprocity. Journal of. 政. 大 organizational behavior, 24(5), 537-559. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.205. 立. ‧ 國. 學. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.. ‧. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13. y. er. io. sit. York: Wiley. Doi: N/A.. Nat. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New. n. Djurdjevic, E., Stoverink, A. C., Klotz, a A. C., Koopman, J., da v Motta Veiga, S. P., Yam, K. C.,. i. l. n C h status: The development & Chiang, J. T. J. (2017). Workplace and validation of a scale. i U e. ngch. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(7), 1124-1147. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000202 Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., Berry, J. W., & Lian, H. (2008). The development and validation of the Workplace Ostracism Scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1348-1366. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012743 Ford, J. K., MacCallum, R. C., & Tait, M. (1986). The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel psychology, 39(2), 291314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00583.x Freese, C., & Schalk, R. (1996). Implications of differences in psychological contracts for human resource management. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(4), 501-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414875 George, E., Chattopadhyay, P., & Ng, C. K. (2016). The relationship between workgroup blending and perceived organizational inducements: The mediating roles of tasks and. 42. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(48) relationships. Australian Journal of Management, 41(3), 538-562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896215595680 Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of marketing research, 186192. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172650 Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265 Harter, S. (1978). Effectance motivation reconsidered: Toward a developmental model. Human Development, 1, 661-669. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271574 Haynes, S. N., Richard, D., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: a functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological assessment, 7(3), 238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238 Herriot, P., Manning, W. E. G., & Kidd, J. M.治 (1997). The content of the psychological. 政. 大 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467contract. British Journal of management, 8(2), 151-162.. 立. ‧ 國. 學. 8551.0047. Hinkin, T. R. (1985). Development and application of new social power measures in superior-. ‧. subordinate relationships (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida). Doi: N/A.. y. Nat. Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey. er. io. sit. questionnaires. Organizational research methods, 1(1), 104-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106 a. n. iv l C n Hinkin, T. R., & Tracey, J. B. (1999). Anhanalysis approach to content validation. U e n g cof h ivariance Organizational Research Methods, 2(2), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819922004 Hom, P. W., Tsui, A. S., Wu, J. B., Lee, T. W., Zhang, A. Y., Fu, P. P., & Li, L. (2009). Explaining. employment. relationships. with. social. exchange. and. job. embeddedness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013453 Hui, C., Lee, C., & Wang, H. (2015). Organizational inducements and employee citizenship behavior: The mediating role of perceived insider status and the moderating role of collectivism. Human Resource Management, 54(3), 439-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21620 Jowett, G. E., Hill, A. P., Hall, H. K., & Curran, T. (2016). Perfectionism, burnout and engagement in youth sport: The mediating role of basic psychological. 43. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(49) needs. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 24, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.01.001 Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of management journal, 33(4), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287 Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation. Doi: N/A. Kickul, J., & Lester, S. W. (2001). Broken promises: Equity sensitivity as a moderator between psychological contract breach and employee attitudes and behavior. Journal of business and psychology, 16(2), 191-217. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011105132252 Kotter, J. P. (1973). The psychological contract: Managing the joining-up process. California management review, 15(3), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.2307/41164442 Krzystofiak, F., Cardy, R. L., & Newman, J. (1988). Implicit personality and performance appraisal: The influence of trait inferences治 on evaluation behavior. Journal of Applied. 政. 大 Psychology, 75, 515-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.515. 立. ‧ 國. 學. Lambert, L. S. (2011). Promised and delivered inducements and contributions: an integrated view of psychological contract appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 695-712.. ‧. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021692. y. Nat. Lee, C., Liu, J., Rousseau, D. M., Hui, C., & Chen, Z. X. (2011). Inducements, contributions,. er. io. sit. and fulfillment in new employee psychological contracts. Human Resource. n. Management, 50(2), 201-226.ahttps://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20415 v. i. l. n MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., &CFetter, h e R. (1991). i U Organizational citizenship behavior. ngch. and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons' performance. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(1), 123-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90037-T March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Doi: N/A. Nikolaou, I., Tomprou, M., & Vakola, M. (2007). Individuals' inducements and the role of personality:. implications. for. psychological. contracts. Journal. of. Managerial. Psychology, 22(7), 649-663. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710820082 Nunnally, J. C. (1976). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879. 44. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(50) Porter, L. W., Pearce, J. L., Tripoli, A. M., & Lewis, K. M. (1998). Differential perceptions of employers' inducements: Implications for psychological contracts. Journal of organizational behavior, 19(S1), 769-782. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(1998)19:1+<769::AID-JOB968>3.0.CO;2-1 Reis, H. T. (1994). Domains of experience: Investigating relationship processes from three perspectives. Theoretical frameworks for personal relationships, 87-110. Doi: N/A. Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily wellbeing: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 26(4), 419-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200266002 Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M. S., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study. Academy of management Journal, 37(1), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.5465/256773 Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (2013). Organizational behavior. Pearson. Doi: N/A. Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of治 their own and their employer's obligations:. 政. 大 A study of psychological contracts. Journal of organizational behavior, 11(5), 389-400.. 立. ‧ 國. 學. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030110506. Doi: N/A.. Rousseau, D. M. (2000). Psychological contract inventory technical report. Pittsburgh:. ‧. Carnegie Mellon University. Doi: N/A.. y. er. io. sit. Doi: N/A.. Nat. Rummel, R. J. (1970). Applied factor analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.. n. Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). and internalization. Journal a Perceived locus of causality v. l. n C h 57, 749- 761. of Personality and Social Psychology, i U e. i. ngch. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749. Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality edward l., deci and. Perspectives on motivation, 38(237), 237-288. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 141-166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). From ego-depletion to vitality: Theory and findings concerning the facilitation of energy available to the self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 702–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00098.x. 45. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(51) Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well‐being. Journal of personality, 65(3), 529-565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x Ryan, R. M., & Grolnick, W. S. (1986). Origins and pawns in the classroom: Self-report and projective assessments of individual differences in children's perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(2). 550-558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.550 Ryan, R. M., Kuhl, J., & Deci, E. L. (1997). Nature and autonomy: Organizational view of social and neurobiological aspects of self-regulation in behavior and development. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 701-728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579497001405 Ryan, R. M., Sheldon, K. M., Kasser, T., & Deci, E. L. (1996). All goals are not created equal: An organismic perspective on the nature of goals and their regulation. Doi: N/A. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of治 positive human health. Psychological. 政. 大 inquiry, 9(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0901_1. 立. ‧ 國. 學. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic. ‧. approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 3(1), 71-92.. y. Nat. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326. er. io. sit. Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Rawsthorne, L., & Ilardi, B. (1997). Trait self and true self:. n. Cross-role variation in the Big aFive traits and its relations v with authenticity and subjective. i. l. n well-being. Journal of PersonalityCand 73, 1380-1393. h e Social Psychology, i U. ngch. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1380 Schreurs, B., van Emmerik, I. J., Van den Broeck, A., & Guenter, H. (2014). Work values and work engagement within teams: The mediating role of need satisfaction. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 18(4), 267-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000009 Schriesheim, C. A., & Hinkin, T. R. (1990). Influence tactics used by subordinates: A theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson subscales. Journal of applied psychology, 75(3), 246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.246 Schriesheim, C. A., Powers, K. J., Scandura, T. A., Gardiner, C. C., & Lankau, M. J. (1993). Improving construct measurement in management research: Comments and a quantitative approach for assessing the theoretical content adequacy of paper-and-pencil. 46. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(52) survey-type instruments. Journal of Management, 19(2), 385-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639301900208 Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. Research in organizational behavior, 2(1), 3-43. Doi: N/A. Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R., & Reis, H. T. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 22(12), 1270-1279. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962212007 Shin, J., Taylor, M. S., & Seo, M. G. (2012). Resources for change: The relationships of organizational inducements and psychological resilience to employees' attitudes and behaviors toward organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 727748. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0325 Stone, E. (1978). Research methods in organizational behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman. Doi: N/A. Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli,治 A. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the. 政. 大 in employees pay off? Academy of employee-organization relationship: Does investment. 立. ‧ 國. 學. Management journal, 40(5), 1089-1121. https://doi.org/10.5465/256928 Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In. ‧. Advances in experimental social psychology, 29, 271-360.. y. Nat. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2. er. io. sit. Vansteenkiste, M., Neyrinck, B., Niemiec, C. P., Soenens, B., Witte, H., & Broeck, A. (2007).. n. On the relations among work value need satisfaction and job a orientations, psychological v. i. l. n outcomes: A self‐determinationC htheory approach. i U Journal of occupational and e. ngch. organizational psychology, 80(2), 251-277. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X111024 Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of management, 34(1), 89-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913 Wang, D., Tsui, A. S., Zhang, Y., & Ma, L. (2003). Employment relationships and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24(5), 511-535. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.213 White, R. W. (1963). Ego and reality in psychoanalytic theory. New York: International Universities Press. Doi: N/A. Yousaf, A., Yang, H., & Sanders, K. (2015). Effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on task and contextual performance of Pakistani professionals: the mediating role of. 47. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(53) commitment foci. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2012-0277 Zhao, H. A. O., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work‐related outcomes: a meta‐analysis. Personnel psychology, 60(3), 647-680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00087.x. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 48. i Un. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(54) T. ；T. ）. 「化. 一. ；. ；. c. 》. m. 化 à. 一. c. ：. ； m. ；. ２. 》小一. g. 支@. ；. ；上. m. t３. à. t３. à. t. (. ）立. 女. ２. 《. m. ；. Ch. engchi U. m 一. 化. 一. n @. ；. al. sit. m. 女. er. io. ；》. y. Nat. ；. @. ‧. 一. 化@. 學. ；. ‧ 國. 一. g. 政治大. 反）. v ni. 》. @. 一 c. ２. ；》g. 一. ；. 《. ； (). T. 切 e. 一 (. ； 6. 10 :. 49. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(55) T. ；》. m. ３上. 女. @. 782.63 .:376.4 360 1516:9 一. g. l. 一. g. 》. n. ３. 《. @. 女. l. u. w. g. u 七. w. 今. 政治大. w. 立. w 一. ‧ 國. 學. w. ‧. w. ，. g. 天. w. w. g. w w. 一. a l： Ch. ？. 口. g. 比. engchi. i Un. v. 之g. w w w. y. 天. sit. w. g. er. ). ２. n. w. io. (. Nat. 仍. g 公. w g w. 一. o. g（. ：. ２. 分. 予. ：. 50. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(56) 土女. + -9.3. 。. -. d@. 月. @ l天. c. 《一. ２. 《. @. ２. e 女. (. e. ）. 政治大. 力 T. 土. １. 力 —. １. 學. 女. 化. ‧. Nat. io. sit. y. （. n. al. er. ）. ‧ 國. 立. 女. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 51. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(57) ；. T. g. ）. T. 「化. 一. ；. ；. c 》. m. ２. ；. 》. m. 小一. g 化. 一. ；. ；. ：. （. ；. 》. u. c. 支@. ；上. m à. t３. à. t３. 政治大. 反）. 立 w. 天. g@. Nat. —. 女. al. n. l. —. io. ）i. ；. 天. ‧. ；；. ‧ 國. 天〈T. 學. ；. ；. 化. @. T. Ch. engchi. m 一. ）. y. (. ）. sit. t. T. ）. er. à. i Un. v. 》. @. 一 c. ２. ：g. 一. ；. 《. ； (). T. 切. 一；. e. (. 6. 10 :. 52. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(58) T. 切. g. w. g. 女. 《. @. u 七. w. 今. w w w. 一. w. ， g 仍天. ：. ？. w. g. io. w. ‧. 之g. Nat. w. 口. al o iv n Ch engchi U. n. g w. y. w. 天立一. sit. w. g. er. ). ２. ‧ 國. w. 學. (. 政治大. 一 g（２. ：分. 予. ：. 53. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(59) 土女. + -9.3. e. -. 女. 。. e. d@. 月. @ l天. c. @. g g. ri @ 立. ‧ 國. w. 木〈. g. g. w. 天. al. 《. n. @. io. 天《. u. g. y. 土. Nat. 天. @. ‧. w. 木〈. 政治大. 學. ). g. sit. T. er. (. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. @. 天《. l. 《. T. w. 《天. ３. @. T 工. ４ w. @. 54. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(60) w. ４. e c a. 介. 分. 仍. w. @ ）女. ）. 女. 立. 力 T. 土. １. 政治大. 化. 力 —. １. （. 學 ‧. ‧ 國 io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 公. T. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 55. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(61) ；. ）. g. 「化. 一. ；. ；. c 》. m. ２. ；. 》. m. 小一. g 化. 一. ；. ；. （. ：. ；. 》. u. c. 支@. ；上. m à. t３. à. t３ t. (. 政治大. 反）. 立. ；. —. ）女. y. al T Ch. n. ；. ；. engchi U. m 一. 化. g@. —. io. ）. 天. Nat. ；. 天. sit. w. ‧. ‧ 國. 天〈T. 學. ；. er. à. v ni. ）@. 》. @. 一 c. ２. ：g. 一. ；. 《. ； (). T. 切. 一；. e. (. 6. 10 :. 56. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(62) T. 切. g. 女. 《. @. 《. @. g g g g. c一 g. 一. 人. g g g. 立. 不. 政治大. g. ‧. ‧ 國. １. io. g. y. Nat. g. al. 一. n g. 學. g. 〈. sit. ). 乃. er. (. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. g g (. l. g. ). 止一. g 切. l. c. 女. ２. i. l. 」. 57. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(63) 土女. + -9.3. e. -. 女. 。. e. d@. 月. @ l天. c. @. g g. ri @ 立. ‧ 國. w. 木〈. g. g. w. 天. al. 《. n. @. io. 天《. u. g. y. 土. Nat. 天. @. ‧. w. 木〈. 政治大. 學. ). g. sit. T. er. (. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. @. 天《. l. 《. T. w. 《天. ３. @. T 工. ４ w w. @. ４ 58. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(64) e c a. 介. 分. 仍. w. @ ）女. ）. 力 T. 女. 立. 土. １. 化. 力 —. １. （. 政治大學 ‧. ‧ 國 io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 公. T. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 59. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.002.2019.C01.

(65)