1
CO Oxidation by Electroless Copper Catalyst
: NSC88-2214-E011-006
87/8/1 – 88/7/31
!" (#$% &'()*+
,-,./)
012"3456789:'()
;67&*+/<=,-,./>
?@ABCDEFG;67*+HIJ :KA67LMNOPQR>S;T<
UVWX>YZCT[\]^_A*+
`ab<XRDBETTPRN 2 Oc dSEM_efS;HghiBC,
-,./12*+>./RaAjk lm&gnaJo>DEFG;*+ip Raq=&gnaJr>'()&*+A
<cd;Rs<JtU>uRvwJ x./Ra>'()&*+AVWXyC EDTA z{|ivwJ}~g>&*
+A*+8500[\:,-,
./RazrA
Abstract (Keyword: Copper, Electroless catalyst, CO, Oxidation)
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of preparation method on the electroless copper catalyst for CO oxidation reaction. The impregnated copper catalysts are also prepared for comparison.
All prepared catalysts were characterized by XRD ƋBETƋTPRƋchemisorption and SEM.
The catalysts were further tested by CO oxidation reaction. Experimental results show that the catalysts prepared by the electroless method has better activities than those prepared by the impregnation method, and the electroless copper catalysts
prepared by EDTA chelating agent were better than those by TEA chelating agent.
Furthermore, the calcined electroless copper catalyst (at 500C) presents highest activities among all the catalysts.
12 >
>i
ip">
\ ¡¢£¤¥¦>,-A§
¨,->"S;,->*+
,./A©zª«sz¬<>*+
®C¯u°_±²³A =´
Y±²³¥Uµ¶·¸±iL´ª¹ º12»¼½¾¿ÀÁvCÂôZ±
²³>IJ³ACÅ>12jklm3 IJ³C&zªv¾Æ±²³> ÃÇAÈÉÊi¹º»12&*+3
,-,./>RaA012Ë12
©ÌÍZÎÏ./Ði'(Ñ;67Á Ê>&*+IÒÓ>FG; ÔÕÖ;¤
67ÁÊ>&*+«kÊwrA0¼
½×<'(Ñ;67&*+B/<=,
-,./ØA Ù12S;
1. *+67
'()&*+>67ÚÛÜPQÝ ÞßÞàiáCuâãRàiäå' ()&âãH'()iæÆàçè
éÆ'()&*+Aêë[\iyCìí
>]^Ùqî[\æÆAFG*+yC
ÒÓ>EïFG;67æÆAðñ<>*
2
+"gÙZ òZÚ×<'();
¤67Á>'()&*+óòZ>*+
Ú×<DEFG;¤67Á>*+óòÙ Z>*+Ú×<EïFG;67wAô : * + Ã õ ö ò Z * + C (1).FE-t-f FE-e-c (2).IE-e-fIE-t-c ÷i F øPQ<cd;RiI øPQ<FG;
R A E ø ' ( ) ; ie øVWX
EDTAit y TEAAf øùú*+ic ø
8[\AòZ*+ IWI DEFG
;AFIWI Ûcd;RPQiáDEF G;AIIWI ÛFG;RPQiàáD EFG;AòÙZ*+ CI ÔFG;A 2. CO,./
Ü 0.5 g *+ûüý=./þi®à
å H 2 /Ar Wi= 250>]^
¢*+ 8 qîàiË]iá
,-T,>WiB./
H./A
jk5
1. XRDgh
3XRDi&111>`a
&FU>óuFU>
åBªÆ&`a> !i"
8FE-t#'()*+>&100`a
iuFU>i^!iFE-e
#'()*+y$r%.lmu>å
&?@`õ>j'A8[\à>*
+&`a^i=ª[\8>i
í*+8750[\ài©ª(Ý
&>j'Á©is&>`a^)
*ADEFG;¤w>*+ip&`a
^}='()&*+A 2. BETgh
ø¤ª*+>BET+ø,T- }./A BETjklmiDEFG;*
+>+ø,0q='()&*+i- }./!ilmDEFG;1ÆP
Q2q.3>45A&uFUT PQ×<FG;Rîi+ø,L
q.3675)µA89×<TEA
VWX67'()&*+îi+ø,
IEDTAVWX¤w>*+qi:ÚL
TEA>h);<EDTA>20=iL´
H'()&îi&>?@;hÁiª µU>,dAB>©C¥¦A[\8>
*+ip+,Ifresh*+Ê>qAT 3t][\iBET+ø,!qi- }./!A
3. TPRgh
Fig.1&2>TPRv©ií&u
>FUi&¢ÅD]EFiD EFG;*+y%.is¢3Jt ]>GHÁ©iIî3100dȪJK
>©C¥¦i">¢LÚDEFG;
*+LMNuN>?>?@¤O Fig.3 ylmCEDTAVWX¤67Á>
'()&*+ªPQKÁ©iTEA
#*+RªQ¢KisJt]
>¢i´jkømEDTA#*+
ªgna>&CTbulk&iEDTA#*
+yRªbulk&A89iTPRjklm í[\]^S350M500îi&>
gnaA8t>[\]^y
T&áUVjéÆ\j>©CA
4. cd
ø&*+&ø,gn^
&W/qA jkwXi'()&*+
>&ø,Tgn^iuFU>
iW/yÚ!qAYømíå Pd
>?àiªZ='()&*+Ø>&²³ gniÆW/!qi&ø,>©
C¦Aø 2 lm'()&*+3 500
[\îªz>&ø,gn^iz q>W/Aí[\]^[8 500îi&
ø,\]iøm*+8t][\
ài*+¥¦\j©CA&FUyC 20^
>*+ip&ø,ztign^zri
3
W/zqA&FU>)µi&ø
,gn^!>_Ê_qi&W/
!A89C TEA VWX67'()&
*+îi =p:&>Vj¾`=
EDTAiT&>?1=h)=PQØi
Æ&gn^JqiW/JAPQR
9a>"IiB"?@&Vj>jkA : IWI #*+ibcde&ø,g n^f¬>qi&W/yÚgg>As Pd 0.012^> IWI *+ipgn^&ø
,ihI Pd 0.12^>"Ê>AYøm íNu>Uºi7i&>gni
Æ&Vj>jéggi';}~>g
3PQØA 5. SEMgh
SEMKklmiDEFG;¤6 w>&*+ip&²³>glZmnop
"}~>d=PQØi'();¤w
>*+yJ}~qg=PQØA89 VWX:&²³>glª?@iTEA
#*+ª&²³piVj=PQø
ØiEDTA#*+>&yéÆrs }~qgA
6. *+./Ra
:=,-,./Ra12i Fig.4 lmDEFG;*+ip./RaÚ q='()&*+A'()*+
&uFU>i./a!>trAD EFG;*+yÚuFU>i.
/a.!>toA'()&*+PQ
8cd;R8ài./RaIFG;R
"Ê>tAFig.5 lm3%IuFUi
&FU:,-H,>?@A vdÁDEFG;*+p3D&FUîu
<%o"iM& 20^îu<vªl
>ØwiRª 8.6^xA'()
&*+pu<0&FUØ yAC FE-e-c #*+>u<zti FE-t-c #UiIE-t-c #zoA u
<z{vCdÁiFE-e-c #>*+&
FU>iu<gg>|;iu
<z{J}~i FE-t-c T IE-t-c
#>*+ipu<z{yÚJ-A
*+8[\i:,-,./R aiI fresh *+"Ê>tAFig.5 lm TEA #*+>./RaI EDTA #
*+Ê>Di´ = TEA #*+>&g naI EDTA #*+Ê>oAFig.6 FE-e #>*+8"I>[\]^:
,-,./>?@A vdÁ
8 500[\>*+Razripu<
72.6^i 450Ui8 750
[\à>*+pu<zDiRª 22.8 ^Al®t][\ÜO&¢?>\
jiT&ø,)µAtt>[\]^
ÜHO(Ý&>j'Á©A
1. Barbier, J. Dumas, J.M. Geron, C. and Kribii, A., Appl. Catal., 47, L9 (1989).
2. Bond G.C Namijo S.N and Wakeman J.S, J. Mol.Catal, 64, 305 (1991).
3. Chang, H.F. and Yung, C.F., IECR., 36, 2080 (1997)ƌ
4. Fabio, B.Noronha and Martin Schmal, Appl.. Catal., 78, 125 (1991).
5. Huang, T.J and Yu, T.C, Appl. Catal., 71, 275 (1991).
6. Laine, J. and Severino, F., J. Catal., 129, 297 (1991).
7. Noronha, Fabio, Schmal and Martin, Appl. Catal., 78, 125 (1991).
8. Rossi, S.D., Ferraris, G. and Mancini, R., Appl. Catal., 38, 359 (1988).
BET
BET
(m 2 /g-cat)
(Å)
4 γ-Al 2 O 3 159.9 54.7 Cu 15%-Pd 0.12%
FE-t-f 116.7 60.7 FE-e-f 146.4 62.0 IE-t-f 112.5 66.7 IE-e-f 127.7 69.7 FE-t-c 114.1 64.6 FE-e-c 122.6 66.7 IE-t-c 108.4 70.4 IE-e-c 117.7 71.8
IWI 95.6 74.9
FE-e-c (Pd 0.12
%)
Cu 20 % 112.6 70.3 Cu 15 % 122.6 66.7 Cu 10 % 128.9 63.5 Cu 5 % 147.3 61.9 Cu 15%-Pd
0.012%
FE-t-c 116.8 64.0 FE-e-c 126.2 66.2
IWI 109.6 70.3
(m 2 /g)
(%)
(Å) FE-t series (Cu 15%)
Pd 0.24% 148.6 22.0 45.5 Pd 0.12% 143.7 21.2 47.1 Pd 0.012% 94.7 14.5 75.8
FE-e series (Cu 15%)
Pd 0.24% 274.6 40.6 24.6 Pd 0.12% 253.4 37.5 26.7 Pd 0.012% 171.7 25.4 39.4
FE-e series (Pd 0.12%) Cu 20% 290.7 42.7 23.9 Cu 15% 253.4 37.5 26.7 Cu 10% 201.7 29.8 33.5 Cu 5% 145.6 22.5 46.3
IWI series (Cu 15%)
Pd 0.12% 35.6 5.3 190.2 Pd 0.012% 43.5 6.4 155.7
0 10 0 20 0 30 0 40 0
Tem peratur e ( oC )
H ydrogen C o m sumpt ion
Pd 0.012 % calcin P d 0.12 % calci n Pd 0.24 % calcin
αβ
α β
α
Fig. 1
0 1 00 20 0 3 0 0 4 00 50 0
Tem peratur e ( oC )
Hydrogen C o ms u m ption
Pd 0.0 12 % P d 0.12 %
γ
γ δ
δ
Fig. 2
0 1 00 2 00 30 0 40 0
Temp er atur e (0C )
Hydro gen Coms umpt ion
Cu 5 % Cu 10 % Cu 15 % Cu 20 %
α β
α β
α