Shin-Shan Eiko Yu Department of Physics
National Central University, Taiwan
15 December 2020
Colloquium, Department of Physics National Taiwan University
Search for Dark Matter in pp
Collisions with CMS
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu
• Dark matter searches at colliders
• Overview
• Introduction to LHC and CMS
• Experimental techniques
• Interpretation of results
• Conclusion and outlook
2
Outline
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 3
How Do You “See” an Object?
Reflection Thermal Radiation
Visible for T=3800~7600 K
4
In our galaxy, besides visible stars, is there
something else?
5
Cold Dark Matter:
(CDM) 25%
Dark Energy : ( ) 70%
Stars:
0.8%
H & He gas: 4%
Chemical Elements:
(other than H & He) 0.025%
Neutrinos:
0.17%
CDM CDM
Radiation:
0.005%
CDM CDM
inflationary perturbations baryo/lepto genesis
If I had been present at creation, I would have suggested a simpler scheme. - Alfonse the Wise
Rocky Kolb
What Is Dark Matter?
6
• “Dark Matter” is a temporary name
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 7
“Dark Matter” in Chemistry: Argon
Lo rd Ra yl ei gh Si r Wi lli am Ra ms ay Nitrogen extracted from air is heavier
than that extracted from the chemical reaction by 0.5%
☞ New Unknown Gas: Argon
Discovered in 1894
What Is Dark Matter?
• Influenced by gravitational interaction and no other standard model (SM) interactions
• Interact weakly with normal matter →may need a new type of interaction
8
• “Dark Matter” is a temporary name
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 9
Why Dark Matter?
M33 galaxy
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 10
Reminder of Gravitation Law (Outside the Earth)
r
F r ( ) > R ∝ M r total 2 m v particle 2
r ∝ M total
r 2
⇒ v particle ∝ M total r
R
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 11
Reminder of Gravitation Law: Inside the Earth
r
F r ( ) < R ∝ M r ( )
r
2=
ρ 4 π
3 r
3⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
r
2= r m v
particle2r ∝r
⇒ v
particle∝r
R
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 11
Reminder of Gravitation Law: Inside the Earth
r
F r ( ) < R ∝ M r ( )
r
2=
ρ 4 π
3 r
3⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
r
2= r m v
particle2r ∝r
⇒ v
particle∝r
R
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 12
Extended to the Stars in a Galaxy
r
r
v ∝ M r ( )
r
v r ( ) < R ∝r
v r ( ) > R ∝ 1 r
13
Rotational Curves
Vera Rubin 1928-2016 Measured
~200km/s
Expectation
13
Rotational Curves
Vera Rubin
1928-2016
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 14
Extended to the Stars in a Galaxy
r
v
particle( ) r > R ∝ M r
totalv
particle( ) r > R ∝ M r ( )
r
⇒ M r ( ) ∝r
Gravitation Lensing
15
Abell 2218 Cluster
The size of the Einstein ring is
related to the mass of the lensing
θ ∝ M
lenseGravitation Lensing
15
Abell 2218 Cluster
The size of the Einstein ring is
related to the mass of the lensing
θ ∝ M
lenseGravitation Lensing
15
Abell 2218 Cluster
The size of the Einstein ring is
related to the mass of the lensing
θ ∝ M
lenseBullet Clusters
16
2006 observed
1E0657-558
Bullet Clusters
16
Normal Matter
X-ray image Dark Matter
2006 observed
1E0657-558
Bullet Clusters
17
Bullet Clusters
17
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 18
Dark Matter Detection
DM
DM SM
Direct Detection
SM
Indirect Detection
DM
DM SM
SM
Production at Colliders
DM
DM SM
SM
Introduction to LHC and CMS
19
High Energy Physics Dictionary
• LHC ( )
20
• CERN
– Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire – European Council for Nuclear Research
– Location of LHC and the experiments
CERN
•
23 member states•
Yearly budget 109 CHF (= 3.2 × 1010 TWD)‣
Germany UK France Italy‣
LHC cost ~ 4.3 × 109 CHF21
•
Established by 12 European countries on 1954/09/29•
Origin of WWW‣
Tim Berners-Lee in 1989•
Director‣
Fabiola GianottiShin-Shan Eiko Yu 22
Users Around the World
23
LHC Birdview
23
LHC Birdview
ATLAS
23
LHC Birdview
CMS
23
LHC Birdview
Our offices
24
Text
Tunnel circumference 26.7 km, tunnel diameter 3.8 m Depth : ~ 70-140 m – tunnel is inclined by ~ 1.4% 50-175
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 25
LHC Tunnel
1232 superconducting dipoles Operating temperature: 1.9 K Magnetic dipole field: 8.3 Tesla
Beam-pipe pressure: 10-13 atm
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 25
LHC Tunnel
1232 superconducting dipoles Operating temperature: 1.9 K Magnetic dipole field: 8.3 Tesla
Beam-pipe pressure: 10-13 atm
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 25
LHC Tunnel
1232 superconducting dipoles Operating temperature: 1.9 K Magnetic dipole field: 8.3 Tesla
Beam-pipe pressure: 10-13 atm
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 26
CMS Detector Sketch
27
27
28
Muon Chamber
Superconducting Magnet
B=3.8 Tesla Hadron
Calorimeter
Silicon Tracker Electromagnetic
Calorimeter
CMS Detector
28
Muon Chamber
Superconducting Magnet
B=3.8 Tesla Hadron
Calorimeter
Silicon Tracker Electromagnetic
Calorimeter
CMS Detector
Path of Various Particles
29
Path of Various Particles
29
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu
•
Neutral, weakly-interactive, massive, and stable on the distance- scales of tens of meters•
Dark matter appears as missing transverse momentum in collider detectors30
What Is Dark Matter at Colliders?
Missing
transverse momentum
7m0m3.5 m
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu
µ
jet
Momentum imbalance ν ME
Tμ
μ
•
The negative of the total transverse momentum of all observed particles in the detector31
Missing Transverse Momentum
neutrinos or
dark matter
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 32
•
Mediator has minimal decay width•
Minimal set of parameters•
coupling structure, MMED, mDM, gSM (gq), gDMSimplified Models for Direct DM Production
q
q
!
!
Mediator gSM
(gq) gDM
MMED
mDM
mDM
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 32
•
Mediator has minimal decay width•
Minimal set of parameters•
coupling structure, MMED, mDM, gSM (gq), gDMSimplified Models for Direct DM Production
Features of Mediators
Tae Min Hong, LHCP 2017
q
q
!
!
Mediator gSM
(gq) gDM
MMED
mDM
mDM
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 32
•
Mediator has minimal decay width•
Minimal set of parameters•
coupling structure, MMED, mDM, gSM (gq), gDMSimplified Models for Direct DM Production
Features of Mediators
Tae Min Hong, LHCP 2017
q
q
!
!
Mediator gSM
(gq) gDM
MMED
mDM
mDM
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 32
•
Mediator has minimal decay width•
Minimal set of parameters•
coupling structure, MMED, mDM, gSM (gq), gDMSimplified Models for Direct DM Production
Features of Mediators
Tae Min Hong, LHCP 2017
q
q
!
!
Mediator gSM
(gq) gDM
MMED
mDM
mDM
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 32
•
Mediator has minimal decay width•
Minimal set of parameters•
coupling structure, MMED, mDM, gSM (gq), gDMSimplified Models for Direct DM Production
Features of Mediators
Tae Min Hong, LHCP 2017
q
q
q
q
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 33
Amount of Data We Use
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 33
Amount of Data We Use
σtt ∼ 800 pb Ntt = Lσtt
∼ 3.2 ×107
DM Searches with Missing Transverse Momentum Signatures
34
q
q
!
!
Mediator gSM
(gq) gDM
MMED
mDM
mDM
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 35
Mono-X Diagrams of Direct DM Production
Mono-jet Mono-Z(leptonic) Mono-W/Z(hadronic)
Mono-photon Mono-h (bb, "") Mono-tt/bb
Mono-top
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu
•
Anomalous high MET can be due to:•
Particles striking sensors in the ECAL photodetectors•
Beam halo•
Dead cells in ECAL or HCAL•
Noise in ECAL or HCAL36
Challenges of Missing Transverse Momentum
[GeV]
miss
ET
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Events / 30 GeV
−1
10 1 10 102
103
104
105 Top quark
EWK
QCD
Data after cleaning
Data before cleaning
(13 TeV, 2016) 12.9 fb-1
CMS
Preliminary
Raman Khurana Ching-Wei Chen
CMS-PAS-JME-16-004
Events passing dijet selection
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 37
Fake Missing Transverse Momentum: Noise
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 37
Fake Missing Transverse Momentum: Noise
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 37
Fake Missing Transverse Momentum: Noise
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 37
Fake Missing Transverse Momentum: Noise
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu
Events / GeV
−2
10
−1
10 1 10 102
103
104
105
106
(13 TeV) 35.9 fb-1
CMS monojet
Data
inv.
→ H(125)
= 2.0 TeV Axial-vector, mmed
)+jets ν ν Z(
)+jets ν W(l
WW/WZ/ZZ Top quark
+jets γ (ll), γ Z/
QCD
Data / Pred. 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2
[GeV]
miss
pT
400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Unc.(Data-Pred.) 2−
0 2
killed by MET &
veto of extra objects
PRD 97, 092005 (2018)
•
Rely on MET triggers (offline MET cut ≳200 GeV)•
Major background from Z(→##)+jets, W(→l#)+jets38
Mono-X Searches in Hadronic Final State
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 39
Estimation of Z+Jets Background
Searches for Visible Mediator Decays
40
q
q
q
q
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu
•
high-pT/HT trigger for large-Mjj, ISR "/jet tag or data with only trigger-level objects (data scouting) for small-Mjj41
Visible Mediator Searches
q
q
q
q
Mediator with ISR
q
q
q
q
Mediator
600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
[pb/TeV] jj/dmσd
(13 TeV) 27 fb-1
CMS Data
Fit
gg (0.75 TeV) qg (1.20 TeV) qq (1.60 TeV)
/ NDF = 20.3 / 21 = 1.0 χ2
Wide Calo-jets < 2.04 TeV 0.49 < mjj
| < 1.3 η Δ
| < 2.5, | η
| 106
105
104
103
102
10 1
−1
10
Dijet mass [TeV]
Uncertainty(Data-Fit)
−32
−−011 2 3
0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
[pb/TeV] jj/dmσd
(13 TeV) 36 fb-1
CMS Data
Fit
gg (2.0 TeV) qg (4.0 TeV) qq (6.0 TeV)
/ NDF = 38.9 / 39 = 1.0 χ2
Wide PF-jets > 1.25 TeV mjj
| < 1.3 η Δ
| < 2.5, | η
| 104
103
102
10 1
−1
10
−2
10
−3
10
−4
10
Dijet mass [TeV]
Uncertainty(Data-Fit)
−32
−−011 2 3
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
JHEP 08 (2018) 130
(GeV) mSD
40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Events / 5 GeV
0 5000 10000 15000 20000
25000 Data W(qq)+jets (×3)
Total SM pred. Z(qq)+jets (×3) Multijet pred. t/tt(qq)+jets (×3)
=135 GeV
=0.17, mZ'
Z'(qq), gq'
(13 TeV) 35.9 fb-1
CMS
: 500-600 GeV pT
(GeV) mSD
50 100 150
Data/Prediction
0.9 1 1.1
JHEP 01 (2018) 097
Result Interpretation
42
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 43
Mono-X With Vector/Axial Mediators
Mono-jet
Mono-W/Z(hadronic) Mono-Z(leptonic)
Mono-photon
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 44
Collider Results Only (Vector Mediator)-Mono-X
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 45
Collider Results Only (Vector Mediator)
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 46
If We Use Different Parameter Values
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 47
Collider v.s. Non-Collider Experiments (SI)
gq=0.25, gDM=1
σSIvector ! 6.9 × 10−41cm2 gqgDM 0.25
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
2 1 TeV Mmed
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
4 µnχ 1 GeV
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
2
MMed
mDM
mDM
$
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 47
Collider v.s. Non-Collider Experiments (SI)
No upper bound Experimental limit
gq=0.25, gDM=1
σSIvector ! 6.9 × 10−41cm2 gqgDM 0.25
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
2 1 TeV Mmed
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
4 µnχ 1 GeV
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
2
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 47
Collider v.s. Non-Collider Experiments (SI)
No upper bound Experimental limit Upper bound limited
by mediator mass (collider energy)
gq=0.25, gDM=1
σSIvector ! 6.9 × 10−41cm2 gqgDM 0.25
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
2 1 TeV Mmed
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
4 µnχ 1 GeV
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
2
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 48
Collider v.s. Non-Collider Experiments (SD)
For the model parameters considered here, collider experiments can probe SD cross sections 2-3 orders of magnitude smaller than the non-collider experiments.
gq=0.25, gDM=1
σSDaxial ! 2.4 × 10−42cm2 gqgDM 0.25
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
2 1 TeV Mmed
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
4 µnχ 1 GeV
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
2
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 49
CMS Phase-2 Upgrade
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 49
CMS Phase-2 Upgrade
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu 50
The Detector Lab @ NCU
Grid computing room for AMS, CMS, KAGRA
Space for Scintillator+SiPM detector for muography Cleanroom for Silicon
detector for CMS/sPHENIX
~2000 cores
~500 TB
Space for testing, inspection,
repair and students
~45m2
Cleanroom
~26m2
Service room
~7m2
Buffer room
~10m2
~11m2
~41m2
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu
•
cleanroom ~26m2•
service + buffer room ~17m2•
class 1000 with temperature and humidity controlled at 22℃and relative humidity (RH) 55%
all year round
•
fully operation with pressured dry-air service51
Cleanroom
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu
•
left self-designed 8-inch probe station used for the large pad silicon sensors•
right 4-inch probe station used for PHOBOS and CMS Preshower (being upgraded for sPHENIX)•
A new 8-inch MPI probe station was installed in mid-November for CMS HGCal and sPHENIX52
Probe Stations
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu
•
Aerotech 1.25x1.25 m2 robotic gantry with Labview control.•
OGP optical 3d measurement•
Hesse BJ820 automatic Bondjet and DAGE 4000 Bondtester(puller)•
Manual probe station and picoprobes (not visible in this pic)•
glue dispensers, mini-gantry, microscope, degassing chamber, Keithley 2410 and tools …53
Cleanroom Equipments at NTU
Gantry
OGP Bondjet
Puller
mini-gantry Gantry
control
A set of jigs and tooling for 6-inch HGCal module assembly
54
1. Deposit epoxy on Cu baseplate
2. Place gold-plated
Kapton film 3. Deposit epoxy and silver epoxy on Kapton
4.Place sensor on top of Kapton
5. Deposit epoxy on sensor, avoiding opening bond pads
6.Place PCB on top of sensor
Shin-Shan Eiko Yu
•
CMS has an extensive darkmatter program, including both searches for mediators and
searches in mono-X channels
•
137 fb-1 of full Run II data are yet to be analyzed56
Conclusion and Outlook
•
Moving towards more advanced/sophisticated models•
t-channel production•
spin-2 mediators, long-lived mediators or intermediate“dark” particles