• 沒有找到結果。

心臟衰竭治療的新契機:心臟再同步化治療

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "心臟衰竭治療的新契機:心臟再同步化治療"

Copied!
12
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

579

ၡāāࢋ

ᙯᔣෟĈ͕᝙਽ა ( Heart failure )

͕᝙ГТՎ̼ڼᒚ ( Cardiac resynchronization therapy )

༼ޠጡ ( Pacemaker )

݈֏

ܕೀѐֽᐌ඾ᘽۏ͕̈́ጱგ̬ˢّڼᒚ۞ቿ ݎ൴णĂధк჌͕᝙ঽଈ۞πӮх߿ѐ᛬ౌ̂̂

۞೩੼Ă఺ֱঽଈࣧώΞਕЯࠎ͕᝙ঽ൴҃εΝ Ϡ׻Ăҭдன΃Ϥٺຬା଀آĂѣ࠹༊ּͧ۞ঽ ଈౌਕх߿˭ֽĂּтާّ͕҉ୟ๫ٕާّ͕҉

ۆĂҭߏĂ఺ᇹх߿˭ֽ۞ঽˠــ̙ߏܧ૱۞

ઉ૵Ă͕᝙Αਕᔘߏצז࠹༊۞ຫ๋Ăѩޢܮј ࠎ͕᝙਽ა۞ঽଈĂͷ૱૱Яѩซ΍ᗁੰĂ၆ঽ ଈăछल̈́ۤົౄјޝ̂۞࢑ፉćϫ݈͕᝙਽ა

۞ঽˠᇴϒుѐ˯̿Ă 2002 ѐ઼࡚͕᝙םົ௚

ࢍĂБ࡚ࡗѣ̣Ѻ༱ˠଈѣ͕᝙਽აĂՏѐࢋ܅

෱д఺ཏঽଈ۞ᗁᒚྤ໚̂ࡗߏ׌Ѻα˩ᆆ࡚

ܛĂͷ఺࣎୉ཏ۞ˠ˾ᇴϒͽՏѐ̣˩̣༱ˠ۞

ిޘдᆧΐĂҤࢍז 2037 ѐ఺࣎ᇴϫ૟ࡎ৔˘

˼༱ˠ ( http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/resources/docs/

cht-book.htm )ĂЯѩ఺࣎યᗟ၁̙ट̈㌿Ą ņ͕᝙ГТՎ̼ᒚڱŇ( cardiac resynchroniza- tion therapy, CRT ) ߏ੫၆ќᒺّ͕᝙਽ა ( sys- tolic heart failure ) ়ଈ۞˘࣎ࡎ৔ّڼᒚĂᄃ็

௚۞˾ڇᘽۏٙᏜ۞ܐ৺ٕѨ৺࿰֨ѣޝ̂۞म ҾĂιߏᖣϤۡତԼត͕᝙ྯજ۞ሀёĂֽ྿ז ϲӈԼච͕᝙Αਕ۞ϫ۞Ă˵ᖣϤχ৔ೋّೈ

ᒖĂ૲ᅳ͕᝙ـр۞͞Шត̼ĂӈٙᏜ۞ͅШ๬

ݭ ( reverse remodeling )ćϤٺ CRT ༼ޠጡ˯ξ̙

(2)

זˬѐĂᓜԖྏរྵ͌ĂГΐ˯ᆊॾڀෳĂϫ݈

̙ გ ߏ ࡚ ΐ г ડ ٕ ߏ ለ ߷ ͕ ᝙ ጯ ົ ౌ ၆ ତ צ C RT ۞ঽଈѣᚑॾ۞߄ᏴĂԧࣇ۞ઉܲԊϺѣ ᙷҬఢቑĂϫ݈ࢨט୧ІΒ߁Ĉ

˘ă৸ࡗ͕᝙ጯົΑਕ̶ᙷ ( New York Heart Association Functional Class ) ௐˬƂα৺۞͕᝙਽ა

˟ăν͕ड΍த ( left ventricular ejection frac- tion, LVEF )̈ٺ 35 Ʀ

ˬă͕࿪ဦពϯԆБّνՁڑܡᕝ ( com- plete left bundle branch block, cLBBB ) ͷ QRS ᆵ ޘ̂ٺ 130 ୮ࡋ

αăֹ̏ϡዋ༊۞ᘽۏଠט̪̙ਕԼච ϫ݈ C R T д઼̰ߏϡְ݈ᆶߤ۞͞ёგ טĂϤᗁरᄓะঽଈ۞࠹ᙯྤफ़೩΍ϦኛĂᆶ८

࿅඀ࡗ׌ฉĂ͘ఙޢĂυืՏˬז̱࣎͡Ϥ͕᝙

ࡊᗁर੨Ъ෹ࢰگᑭߤĂෛঽˠېڶү፟ጡనؠ

۞አፋᄃ੠ᖸĄ

͕᝙ГТՎ̼ڼᒚ ( CRT ) ۞៍هϤֽ

˘Ѩ͕᝙۞ຨજ࠻ҬᖎಏĂҭ׎၁Βӣ˞ܧ

૱ኑᗔ۞ՎូĂ׎̚ঘ̈́ઉБ۞࿪Ϡந็ጱր௚

( His-Purkinje system )ăϒቁ۞௟ࡪͅᑕăͽ̈́ϒ

૱۞҉҇ќᒺĂЇң˘࣎ᒖ༼΍᏾ౌΞͽጱ࡭͕

᝙ᑒ঒۞Αਕள૱Ăͷצຫ۞ొЊ҉҇ົ஝ాԆ р۞ొЊĂ˳҃˳̝ፋ͕࣎᝙ౌజٳ௢ć׏ݭ۞

ּ̄тνՁڑ็ጱܡᕝٕдΠ͕ыٸ˞็௚͕ޠ አ༼ጡ۞ঽˠĂν͕ވ۞࿪ঈੈֽཱིҋΠ͕ވ۞

҉҇Ă҃ܧϒ૱۞ His-Purkinje system Ăٺߏ༊

͕ވ̚࿣ฟؕќᒺॡĂྵᅈ۞઎ጨ ( lateral free wall ) ᔘ՟ତќזќᒺܫཱིĂᔘઃ঻д˯˘࣎න

ૺېၗĂඈז઎ጨฟؕࢋќᒺॡĂ͕ވ̚࿣̏གྷ ฟؕࢋනૺĂكѩಶညᙘᙘڕĂ̙ҭ͕᝙ᑒ঒۞

ड़தҲĂͷᔘਈ෱ͧϒ૱͕᝙Հк۞ਕณ̖ਕݍ

ૻჯ޺౵ҲᅮՐĄ

C RT ۞៍هಶߏֽҋٺ˯ࢗ۞៍၅Ăтڍ ԧࣇ૟ጱໂ ( lead ) ٸཉд౵टٽؼᏵќᒺ۞ొ

ҜĂٕߏд͕ވ׌઎Чٸཉ˘୧ጱቢĂТॡו

፬ăТॡќᒺĂߏ̙ߏಶΞͽឰ͕᝙̙ТՎ۞ଐ ڶԼචĂซ҃Լត͕᝙਽ა۞ঽ඀׸ĉ

ТՎ̼఺࣎៍ه׎၁̙֭ߏ఺ೀѐֽ̖Ꮈ੓

۞Ăѝд 1976 ѐ Forrester ඈˠдજۏ֗˯ࡁտ

݄ېજਔ়ঽॡಶ൴னĂ૟ߙ୧݄ېજਔܡ๫҃

ֹྍҕგֻٙᑕ۞͕҉ડા৿ҕॡĂಶົౄј͕

᝙ќᒺ̙ТՎ۞ଐԛĂ༊ॡ΁ϡ˞ dyssynchrony

఺࣎фֽԛट఺࣎ன෪

1

Ă࿣ѐ ( 1977 ѐ ) ͟ώ۞

Miyazawau ᗁरдۓ۞͕᝙˯ࡁտ͕ޠአ༼ጡጱ ໂו፬ొҜ၆͕᝙۞ᇆᜩĂ΁൴னٸдΠ͕ы۞

ጱໂٸ࿪ॡĂϤٺ࿪ঈੈཱི۞็ጱ͞Шᄃϒ૱͕

᝙̙ТĂ͕᝙ќᒺ͞ڱ˵ᄃϒ૱ˠ̙ТĂ˵ಶౄ

јЧొҜќᒺ̙ТՎĂ҃΁༊ॡϡ۞ߏ a s y n - chrony ఺࣎ф

2

ć఺׌࣎ф׎၁΃ܑ۞ߏТ˘࣎

ຍޥĂ޽۞ౌߏ͕᝙Чડ๴ќᒺ̙ТՎ۞ଐԛĂ ᄃ̝ᄬຍ࠹ͅ۞ಶߏТՎّĂࡻ͛͛ᚥ̚Ξ֍

synchrony Ă ( re ) synchronization ޽۞ӈߏТՎ

̼Ă൒҃఺࣎៍هৌϒࠎˠٙࢦෛ݋ߏд 1990 ѐ΃ϐഇâ͞ࢬߏЯࠎν͕ވጱໂ۞΍னĂͷ జᑕϡдˠវ۞щБّ̈́ΞҖّజᙋ၁ĂΩ˘͞

ࢬ˵ߏЯࠎᇆညࡊԫ۞ซՎĂឰᗁरΞͽϡމ៍

۞͞ڱᑭߤ͕᝙۞ТՎّ֭૟̝ณ̼Ăซ҃ࡁտ CRT ၆͕᝙۞ᇆᜩĄ

CRT ༼ޠጡങˢ۞͞ڱ

׏ݭ۞ C RT ༼ޠጡΒ߁˘ښΞͽٸ΍࿪ו

፬۞࿪Ѱͽ̈́ˬ୧ጱໂĂ࿪Ѱ̂ొЊٸдᗆ੻˭

͞ࡗ׌ ~ ˬ̶̳۞ϩ˭ҜཉĂˬ୧ጱໂགྷϤᗆ੻

˭ᐖਔٕᓖᐝᐖਔซˢ˯ටᐖਔГซˢ͕᝙Ă׎

̚˘୧ጱໂཉٺΠ͕ٗĂΩ˘୧ጱໂཉٺΠ͕

ވĂ҃Г˘୧ጱໂ݋གྷϤ݄ېᐖਔᚭ ( coronary sinus ) ซˢ̶Ҷдν͕ވγ઎۞ߙ୧͕᝙ᐖਔ̶

ڑĂᖣϤጱໂ౤ბώ֗۞ѡޘĂ૟ጱໂΙдҕგ

̰Ă఺ֱಶߏԆј׏ݭ C R T ٙ׍౯۞ૄώՄ फ़Ą

˘ਠᄲֽĂ C RT ༼ޠጡ۞ങˢϫ݈͹ࢋϤ

͕᝙̰ࡊᗁरд͕ጱგވ̰߉ҖĂፋ࣎࿅඀ࡗ

ืᇴ̈ॡĂঽଈʑਠତצԊొ౫ዕĂ֭дᗆ੻

˭͞ᄦౄ˘ϩ˭۞˾ఠĂ൒ޢ૟ˬ୧ጱໂ˘˘

ཉˢĂϤဦ˘Ξͽ࠻΍ν͕ވጱໂଂνᗆ੻˭

ᐖਔซˢೈᒖր௚ޢᖼ˞ޝкᝈĂࠎ˞ឰጱໂ ซˢߙ୧͕᝙ᐖਔ̶ڑϐბĂυืА૟̚۩۞

ጱ͔ᐘଭд݄ېᐖਔᚭ۞ฟ˾Ăϡਗ਼Ш۞ҕგ

ᛷᇆĂؠҜ΍ዋЪ۞ᐖਔ̶ڑĂᖣϡ˘ਠүགྷ

ϩ݄ېજਔፋԛఙ ( percutaneous coronary inter-

(3)

vention ) ۞ጱ͔ቢ ( wire ) ૟ጱໂ૲ҌؠᕇĂϤٺ ᐖਔր௚۞តளّᅈͧજਔր௚ࢋ̂۞ధкĂ ҕგ۞௖௟̈́֕Шــᙱͽ࿰ീĂ૱૱ឰν͕

ވጱໂ۞ཉˢјࠎፋ࣎࿅඀̚౵׍߄ጼّ۞˘

ᒖĂˬ୧ጱໂౌཉٸрޢĂତ˯࿪ѰĂ֭૟࿪

Ѱཉˢϩ˭˾ఠ̚ಶ̂ΑӘјćѣॡĂ݄ېᐖ ਔր௚Ϥٺҕგ֕Ш͉࿅ٺᝈѡĂٕҕგටވ

࿅ٺ௟̈Ă఺ֱଐڶౌΞਕֹᗁरٸୢଂᐖਔ ր௚ങˢν͕ވጱໂĂᖼϤ͕᝙γࡊᗁरͽฟ

˥۞͞ё૟ጱໂۡତ׽ؠдν͕ވ͕҉˯Ă҃

྿זТᇹ۞ड़ڍĂͷͽγࡊ۞͞ڱĂጱໂ۞Ҝ ཉ૟̙צࢨٺ݄ېᐖਔ۞̶οડાĂΞͽ૟ጱ ໂ׽ؠдЇңᓜԖ˯ᄮؠ౵р۞ҜཉĂ৿ᕇߏ

๋˾ྵ̂Ăᔵ൒ܕѐֽ຋౹͘ఙ̏Ξͽֹϡ̰

ෛᙡֽซҖ఺ี͘ఙĂҭঽˠ̪ืБ֗౫ዕĄ

тңീณ͕᝙۞ТՎ̼

ϫ݈Ξͽϡֽᑭរ͕᝙ТՎّ۞̍׍͹ࢋߏ

෹ࢰگĂᔵ൒࿅Ν˵ѣˠྏ඾ϡ׎ι۞̍׍ᑭീ

͕᝙۞ТՎّĂҭϤٺܮӀّᄃщБّ۞҂ณĂ

఺ֱ̍׍ϫ݈ౌઃ঻дྏរล߱Ă՟ѣᒔ଀ᇃھ

۞ᑕϡć८ჃВॎᛷᇆ ( magnetic resonance imag- ing, MRI ) Ϥٺ၆హ௡ᖐ׍ѣ੼ྋژޘĂ၆͕҉

௡ᖐྻજ۞៍၅അѣ࠹༊੼۞ෞᆊĂҭϤٺ఺࣎

ᑭߤᄃ͕ޠአ༼ጡА͇˯۞̙࠹टĂֹ଀ c a r - diac MRI ΪਕोֽᑭរإϏщ྅͕ޠአ༼ጡ۞ঽ ˠĂ఺࣎ࢨטֹ଀ cardiac MRI ௣տΪਕઃ঻д જۏ၁រล߱҃൑ڱᇃھᓜԖᑕϡć८̄ᗁጯ۞

ᑭߤ ( radionuclide angioscintigraphy, RNA ) ˘ۡ

జ̳ᄮߏෞҤ͕᝙Αਕ۞еਚĂ˵ѣˠྏ඾൴ण ϡ RNA ֽޘณ͕᝙۞ТՎّĂҭϤٺ৿ͻܮӀ

ّĂᓜԖᑕϡ̪൒࠹༊ѣࢨć Myocardial con- trast echo ݋ߏΩγ˘࣎അజ൴ण۞̍׍ĂᖣϤڦ ड˘჌д෹ࢰگ˭ົពᇆ۞ᘽۏĂឰν͕ވ۞ට ވܪ੓ֽĂͽਬᄃ͕҉ડ࿣ĂГͽ࿪ཝహវ̶ژ Чొ͕҉۞ќᒺଐڶĂҭϤٺѩ჌෹ࢰگ૞ϡព ᇆ጗פ଀̙ٽĂͷщБّ˵ѣޞซ˘Վᗃ୻Ă఺

჌ᑭߤϫ݈Ϊ֍࿬ߐࡁտ

3

Ą

Ҍٺ෹ࢰگд఺࣎ᅳા۞ᑕϡ݋ߏܧ૱ቿݎ

൴णĂ 1995 ѐ௡ᖐౌ˪ઙ෹ࢰگ ( color-coded tissue Doppler imaging, TDI ) ય͵Ă̜౪۞

Sogaard ඈˠࢵА೩΍ϡ TDI ֽܑன߉ͽ CRT ݈ ޢ͕᝙ќᒺТՎّ۞ត̼

4

Ăଂѩฟୁ˞࿪Ϡந ጯछᄃ෹ࢰگ૞छ̝ม۞ాඕĂ෹ࢰگᑒӄ࿪Ϡ நጯछ˞ྋ CRT ۞үϡ፟טă෹ࢰگᑒӄᗁर ᎡᏴዋЪତצ CRT ۞ঽଈă෹ࢰگ˵జϡֽү ࠎ੠ᖸঽଈăአፋ CRT ༼ޠጡనؠ۞ֶፂĄ TDI

̝ٙͽਕд఺࣎ᅳા၈ᜨᐝ֎Ă౵̂۞ࣧЯߏЯ ࠎιΞͽۡତณ̼͕᝙҉҇۞ќᒺ˧Ă࠹ྵٺ็

௚෹ࢰگϡീณҕ߹ֽมତՐ଀ќᒺ˧۞͞ёĂ ѣޝ̂۞ซՎĂՀࢦࢋ۞ߏĂϤٺፖคߏॡมĂ ᓂคߏిޘĂ੨Ъ͕࿪ဦ۞੃ᐂĂԧࣇΞͽͧྵ

̙Т͕҉ડ๴ќᒺ۞АޢĂଂ҃˞ྋ͕᝙҉҇ќ ᒺ۞ېڶĂтѩᄲ੓ֽĂ TDI ߏӎಶΞͽүࠎീ

ณ͕᝙ТՎ̼۞ᇾ໤҃ᇃھᑕϡ˞׸ĉְ၁˯Ă

ଂ౵ฟؕಶഅ೩זĂ͕᝙۞ќᒺ̙֭ညԧࣇຐည

፟ୠёᑒ঒֤ᇹಏ৷Ă͕᝙۞ԛې˵̙ߏᇾ໤۞

ፚ๪ԛٕΗ๪ԛĂٺߏЧёЧᇹ۞ീณᄃᇴፂᑕ

ྻ҃ϠĂ͕҉۞ᓂШќᒺ ( longitudinal contrac- tion ) ߏϫ݈౵૱జֹϡ˵ߏࡁտ౵к۞޽ᇾĂ ҭ̂छ၆ٺࢋפᇹֱࣹડ๴֭൑ВᙊĂ Schuster ඈˠפ۞ߏ septal ׶ lateral basal segments

5

Ă A n s a l o n e ඈˠפ۞ߏ 5 ࣎ basal segments

6

Ă Turner ඈˠפ 6 ࣎ basal segments

7

Ă Yu ඈˠ

8

̈́ Bordachar ඈˠ

9

݋ߏפ basal ׶ mid В 12 ࣎ seg- ments ĂҭೀͼౌΞ࠻΍ങˢ CRT ݈ޢ۞ត̼ć ፖШќᒺ˧ ( radial force ) ТՎّ۞ࢦࢋّ˵ѣˠ ࡁտĂϫ݈඾ግ۞ˠᔵ൒ྵ͌ĂҭϤѝഇࡁտព ϯĂፖШќᒺ˧ᄃ͕ވќᒺ˧ѣޝр۞ᙯᓑّĂ Dohi ඈˠ˵̏૟̝ϡдତצ CRT ۞ঽଈ֗˯ᑭ

ീĂ଀זᄃᓂШќᒺ˘ᇹр۞៍၅ඕڍĂ Dohi

֭૟఺ֱᇴፂ၆෼ᗓ຋̶ĂՐ΍ septum ̈́ lateral basal wall ಏҜડ๴ԛត ( strain ) ۞ॡมमĂͽΝ

ੵ͕҉̢࠹ٛԵ۞̒ᕘĂՀΞ࠻΍͕᝙ТՎّ۞

඀ޘ

10

ć൒҃Ă͕᝙ߏ࣎តّ̼ޝ̂۞ጡءĂ఺

˘Ѩ۞͕ྯᄃ˭˘Ѩ۞͕ྯᔵ൒࠻Ҭ࠹ТĂҭְ

၁˯̏ѣֱ຋۞म෼Ă఺˘̶ᛗീณ݈ጨă˭˘

̶ᛗീณޢጨĂᚑॾᄲ੓ֽ׎၁̏གྷ৭д̙Т۞

ϲ֖ᕇ˯Ăكѩ࠹ͧྵҋ൒̙̳πĂ˵ЯѩĂ౵

ܕ൴ण΍۞ 4D ϲវ෹ࢰگΞͽྋՙ఺࣎યᗟĂ ΞТॡࡔᐂ˘Ѩ͕ྯ̰ٙѣ͕᝙ડ๴۞ྯજ࢖

ྫĂΝੵЯീณ̙ТѨ͕ྯ͔੓۞ᄱम

11

Ă Kuhl

(4)

ඈˠ֭૟ѩᄃ c a r d i a c M R I ࠹ͧྵ୮̙ᅊҒĂ Kenning ඈˠ

12

ᄃ Kapetanakis ඈˠ

13

˵̏дঽଈ

֗˯ᙋځι۞ΞҖّĄᓁ߁ֽᄲĂ CRT д͕᝙

਽ა۞ঽଈ֗˯ٙणன۞ГТՎ̼۞ਕ˧̏གྷ൑

૶ҌႷĂ̙გϡࣹ჌͞ڱౌΞͽ࠻΍߉ͽ C RT

݈ޢ۞मҾĂͽѩࠎૄᖂĂ̂छၙၙ˞ྋזĂΞ ਕࣧώТՎ̼म҃ܧ LVEF म۞͕᝙̖ߏ CRT ۞

౵̂צৈ۰Ą

͕᝙ГТՎ̼ڼᒚ၆͕᝙۞ᇆᜩ

CRT ၆ҕҖજ˧ጯ۞ᇆᜩ

C RT ၆͕᝙Αਕ۞ᑒӄߏϲӈΞ֍۞Ăࡶ

ͽܬˢّ۞ Millar ጱგֽ៍ീঽଈ͕ވќᒺΑਕ ( +dP/dt

max

)д߉ͽ CRT ݈ޢ۞मளĂΞ࠻΍ϲӈ

۞Լච

14

Ă҃఺ᇹ۞Լචϫ݈̏གྷቁؠΞͽ޺ᜈ Ҍ͌Ηѐͽ˯

15

Ăҭߏтڍͽࠎঽଈ͕᝙̏གྷԼ චĂ҃૟CRT ᇶॡઃͤĂ͕᝙Αਕົϲגតम

16

Ă

఺༊൒ѣΞਕߏ͕᝙ʑॡ̝มֽ̙̈́΃ᐺ۞ቡ߇Ă ҭፂҤࢍĂπӮ੠ᖸ׌ѐΗĂࡗѣˬ̶̝˘۞ঽଈ

ົЯЧёЧᇹ۞ࣧЯ҃ᇶॡ̚ᕝCRT

17

ĂЯѩдᓜ Ԗ˯ቁ၁ߏ࣎ืࢋϒෛ۞યᗟĄ

C RT ၆ν͕ड΍த̈́ဃಽᘝਗ਼߹۞ᇆᜩ˵

ߏ࠹༊ϒࢬ۞Ăдೀ࣎̂ݭ۞ᓜԖࡁտ ( MIRA- CLE, CARE-HF ) ౌΞ࠻זν͕ވड΍தᆧΐͽ

̈́ဃಽᘝਗ਼߹Լච۞ன෪

18-20

Ă఺ॡтڍ૟ CRT ᇶઃĂν͕ވड΍தͽ̈́ဃಽᘝਗ਼߹˫ົГೋ

̼

8

ćᔵ൒ C RT ͹ࢋ੫၆۞ߏν͕ވ۞ГТՎ

̼ĂҭΠ͕ވ۞Αਕ˵ົྫྷ඾Լච

21,22

ĂΪߏޝ ᙱᗃ୻ߏۡତᔘߏมତ۞ᙯܼĄ

ࣃ଀˘೩۞ߏĂ఺ֱΑਕ۞Լච֭՟ѣᆧΐ

͕҉۞ਈউณĂᄃങˢ CRT ݈࠹ͧĂдЃिې

ၗ˭ਈউณྵҲ

23

Ă stress ଐڶ˭ਈউณ҃ͅྵ

23,24

Ă΃ܑ͕҉۞ड़த ( myocardial efficiency )

ᆧΐĂ҃࡝צ˧ ( metabolic reserve ) Հр˞Ą CRT ၆͕᝙Г๬ݭ ( remodeling ) ۞ᇆᜩ

C RT Լච˞͕᝙ќᒺ۞ТՎّĂᆧΐ˞͕

᝙۞ќᒺΑਕĂܜഇ҃֏Ă͕᝙ߏӎᒔ଀˞ॲώ

۞ԼតĉధкᓜԖࡁտౌᙋ၁ν͕ވනૺϐഇ̰

श ( left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, LVEDD )

̈́ν͕ވќᒺϐഇ̰श ( left ventricular end-sys- tolic diameter, LVESD ) ົഴ͌

8

Ăд MIRACLE

trial ̚Ăᔘ࠻ז LV mass ˭ࢫ۞рன෪Ă઱˘˘

࣎ѣঽந̷ͯ៍၅۞ߏ D'Ascia ඈˠд͕᝙਽ა ঽଈү۞̷ͯĂ൴ன߉ͽ CRT ̱࣎͡ޢĂ colla- gen volume fraction ă apoptotic index ̈́ TNF ɗ expression ౌ˭ࢫ˞

25

Ă఺ֱౌߏԼච͕᝙Г๬

ݭ ( reverse remodeling ) ۞ᙋፂĄ CRT ၆ҋޠৠགྷր௚۞ᇆᜩ

ૄٺ၆͕᝙਽აᘽۏ۞ࡁտĂԧࣇۢ྽Ăၙ

ّ͕᝙਽ა۞ঽଈϹຏৠགྷૻޘܜഇ࿅੼Ă၆ঽ ଈ۞࿰ޢѣ̙։۞ᇆᜩĂϹຏৠགྷ۞߿ّ׎၁֭

̙टٽീณĂΪਕͽ˘ֱมତ۞޽ᇴֽ˞ྋঽଈ វ̰Ϲຏৠགྷ̤ጬ۞඀ޘćѣତצ C R T ۞ঽ ଈĂ heart rate variability ົ˯چĂវ̰ cate- cholamine ፧ޘົ˭ࢫ

26

Ă sympathetic nerve activ- ity ˵ົࢫҲ

27

Ăᄃ֓ιצጡܡᕝ጗ ( ɘ-blocker )

ٕҕგૺ˧৵ᖼೱ Ժט጗̈́ҕგૺ˧৵צጡ ܡᕝ጗ ( angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/

angiotensin II receptor blocker ) ѣளѡТ̝̍ӻĄ

׎ι

CRT ˵၆ immune system

28

Ă Cheyne-Stokes respiration

29

ѣᇆᜩĂߏрߏᗼĉ፟טࠎң?ౌѣ ޞซ˘Վࡁտ˞ྋĄ

ᓜԖ̂ఢሀࡁտ ( Clinical trial )

CRT д˘ਠϒ૱ᚭٗඕ͕ޠ ( sinus rhythm ) ঽଈ

֗˯۞֎Ғ

ܕೀѐֽĂԸˢ C RT ࡁտ۞ᗁጯࠧˠ̀࠹

༊۞кĂՏѐ൴ܑд͛ᚥ˯۞ࡁտјڍ̙˭ᇴ ѺĂҭߏĂ఺ֱᙋፂΪਕពϯ CRT ၆͕᝙ߏѣ р఍۞Ăҭ఺ֱ̙֭ߏۡତᙋፂᙋځ CRT ၆ঽ ଈ۞р఍ĂЯѩԧࣇᅮࢋᗕ۠ᐌ፟۞ᓜԖྏរĂ

૟ CRT ۡତᑕϡд͕᝙਽ა۞ঽଈ֗˯Ă੠ᖸ

఺ֱঽˠ۞ଐڶĂΐͽ௚ࢍͧྵĂ఺ᇹ̖ਕۢ྽

CRT ৌϒᓜԖ۞Αड़Ą

ྵѝ۞ೀѐĂϤٺќᐂ۞ঽˠᇴ̙ૉĂ੠ᖸ

۞ॡม̙ૉܜĂͧྵᙱ࠻΍ CRT ၆Ѫ˸த۞ᇆ ᜩĂ఺ֱྏរкΗͽ৸ࡗ͕᝙ጯົΑਕ̶ᙷă̱

̶ᛗ֕ྮ෼ᗓീྏ ( 6-minute walking distance ) ̈́ Ϡ߿ݡኳયס ( quality of life, QOL ) ࠎ޽ᇾĂೀ

ͼٙѣ۞ᓜԖྏរౌពϯ CRT ΞͽԼච఺ֱމ

៍۞޽ᇾ

6,19,30-34

Ă҃఺ֱ޽ᇾᐌ඾ CRT ۞ઃͤү

(5)

ϡົГޘೋ̼

8

ćҭৌϒଣ੅ז CRT Ξͽഴ͌Ѫ

˸தăؼܜх߿த۞Ă݋ߏд 2003 ѐĂ Bradley ੫၆࿅Νೀѐ۞ࡁտٙү۞௚Ъ̶ّژ ( meta- analysis )Ă൴ன CRT ੵ˞ͽ˯۞Αड़γĂΞਕ၆

͕ЯّѪ˸̈́Гҝੰத˵ߏѣᑒѓ۞

35

Ăٺߏд

఺׌ѐ۞ COMPANION

36,37

̈́ CARE-HF

20

̚Ăଣ

੅ ۞ ಶ ߏ ఺ ࣎ ࢦ ࢋ ۞ ᛉ ᗟ Ă ҃ ޝ ੼ Ꮈ ۞ ߏ Ă C RT ੵ˞ൺഇਕૉԼචঽˠাېγĂܜഇֽᄲ

˵ ቁ ၁ ਕ Լ ච Ѫ ˸ த Ă ഴ ͌ Г ҝ ੰ த Ă ҃ д CARE-HF ̚Ă Bentkover ඈˠ˵ͽѩྤफ़ଣ੅ј ώड़ৈ̶ژ ( cost-benefit )Ăᄮࠎᔵ൒ CRT ᆊॾڀ

ෳĂҭ҂ᇋזЯࠎഴ͌ҝੰத̈́Ѫ˸தٙ༼࠷۞

᏿Ă׌۰ߏम̙к۞

38

Ą

CRT д͕ٗᝫજ ( Atrial fibrillation )ঽଈ֗˯۞֎Ғ

͕᝙਽ა۞ঽˠϤٺ͕ވ̰ᑅ˧੼Ă૱มତ ጱ࡭͕ٗᕖ͔̂҃੓͕ٗᝫજĂ఺ཏঽˠϤٺ՟

ѣᏱڱ͕͕ٗވТՎ̼ ( AV synchrony )Ă૱జލ

ੵдᓜԖྏរ̝γĂҭдன၁Ϡ߿྆Ă͕᝙਽ა Ъ׀͕ٗᝫજ̙д͌ᇴĂϫ݈੫၆఺ᙷঽˠ۞ᓜ Ԗྏរౌពϯϒࢬ۞ड़ڍ

39-42

ĂҭтТѝഇ۞ᓜ ԖྏរਠĂϫ݈఺ֱྏរౌΪଣ੅ז৸ࡗ͕᝙ጯ

ົΑਕ̶ᙷă̶̱ᛗ֕ྮ෼ᗓീྏăͽ̈́Ϡ߿ݡ ኳયסĂΪѣ Hay ඈˠഅϡܬˢّ͞ё੃ᐂҕҖ જ˧ጯ۞ត̼ ( +dP/dt )Ă҃଀΍ CRT ͧ׎΁ಏ˘

ጱໂו፬ ( ಏ˘ν͕ވו፬ٕಏϡΠ͕ވו፬ )

ֽ଀р۞ඕኢ

43

Ă Gaspaeini ඈˠ݋ᄮࠎĂᑕซ˘

Վ ͽ ࿪ ፵ ۞ ͞ ё ౄ ј ٗ ވ ็ ጱ ܡ ᕝ Ă Ԇ Б ϡ C RT ֽଠטঽଈ۞͕ྯᇴ̈́็ጱ͞ШĂ̖ਕৌ

ϒԼචঽˠ۞ېڶ

44

Ą

CRT д็௚͕᝙༼ޠጡঽଈ֗˯۞֎Ғ

็௚͕ޠአ༼ጡ۞͕ވጱໂ˘ਠߏٸдΠ͕

ވ͕ыొĂ఺჌͕ޠአ༼ጡ۞͕࿪ဦ࠻੓ֽಶޝ ညԆБνՁڑܡᕝĂ Bordachar ඈˠ

45

៍၅ֱ֤

ֹϡ็௚͕ޠአ༼ጡͷѣ͕᝙਽ა۞ঽଈ۞͕࿪

ဦॡĂ൴னᔵ൒΁ࣇ۞͕࿪ဦ׶ֹϡ༼ޠጡҭ൑

͕᝙਽ა۞ঽଈ՟ѣमளĂ҃༊ࠎ఺ֱঽˠچ৺

ࠎ CRT ༼ޠጡॡĂቁ၁൴னঽଈ̙გдТՎ̼

޽ᇾ˯ă͕᝙ќᒺ˧˯ͽ̈́ྻજਕ˧˯Ăౌ଀ז ځព۞ԼචĂͷԼච۞಼ޘᄃࣧώߏνՁڑ็ጱ ܡᕝ۞ঽଈ̙࠹˯˭

46

ĂՀࠤ۰Ă Ritter ඈˠͧ

ྵࣧώΪѣᅅ຋͕᝙Αਕצຫ۞ঽˠĂЯࠎ̙௑

Ъν͕ވќᒺΑਕ̈ٺ 3 5 % ۞୧ІĂЯѩତצ

็௚͕ޠአ༼ጡĂΩ˘ཏঽଈ݋ߏৌϒ͕᝙਽ა ( ν͕ވќᒺΑਕ̈ٺ 3 5 % ) ͷνՁڑ็ጱܡ ᕝĂЯѩତצ CRT ڼᒚĂ੠ᖸ̱࣎͡ޢ൴ன֤

ֱࣧώ͕᝙Αਕᔘр۞ঽଈЯ͕᝙યᗟГˢੰ۞

፟தౣ൒ͧࣧώಶ͕᝙਽ა۞ˠᔘ੼

47

Ă఺ֱ៍

၅Ωˠ̙༰ᘃႷĂߏӎ˭ѨГѣঽˠืࢋങˢ͕

ޠ አ ༼ ጡ ॡ Ă ԧ ࣇ ᑕ ྍ ˘ ฟ ؕ ಶ ࠎ ঽ ˠ ങ ˢ CRT? COMBAT trial ߏΩγ˘࣎ϒдซҖ̚۞̂

ݭ݈ᖀّࡁտĂ૟Я͕ຨ࿅ၙͷ͕᝙਽ა۞ঽଈ

̶ј׌௡â௡ତצ็௚͕ޠአ༼ጡڼᒚă˘௡

ۡତତצ CRT ڼᒚĂ࿰ࢍ੠ᖸ׌ѐĂ៍၅ঽଈ х߿தĂ఺࣎ࡁտ۞ඕڍ๕υ၆Ϗֽ۞ᓜԖՙඉ

ౄјᇆᜩĂԧࣇΞͽ޹ϫͽޞ

48

Ą

إѣۋᛉ۞ኝᗟ

CRT ၆͕ޠ̙ፋ۞ᇆᜩ

2003 ѐĂ Medina-Ravell ඈˠࢵޘ൴ܑ CRT

ົ͔੓Гໂ̼ ( repolarization ) ᗓ೸۞ଐԛ ( Β߁ QTc ă transmural dispersion of repolarization ඈ޽

ᇾ )Ă֭࿰ീΞਕᆧΐ torsade des pointes ۞፟ົ

49

Ă

̝ޢౙౙᜈᜈѣ˘ֱ९ּಡӘĂពϯ CRT ቁ၁ дߙֱঽଈ۞֗˯͔੓˞࡭׻۞͕ޠ̙ፋ

50

Ăଯ

׎ࣧЯĂѣΞਕߏϤٺ CRT ۞ LV lead Аו፬˞

epicardium Ă҃ϒ૱۞ Purkinje system ݋ߏА߿

̼ endocardium ĂЯѩౄјΝໂ̼ᄃГໂ̼۞Լ តĂ൒҃Ăޢᜈ۞ࡁտݒѣ̶ڡ۞ඕڍĂѣֱࡁ տᄃ Medina-Ravell ѣᙷҬ۞ඕڍ

51

ĂࠤҌΞͽү ࠎ࿰ീ↢Ѫ۞޽ᇾ

5 2

Ăѣֱඕڍݒᄃ̝ޫޫ࠹

ͅĂТᇹ۞Гໂ̼޽ᇾĂങˢ C R T ޢ҃ͅԼ

53,54

ćҌ͌זϫ݈ࠎͤĂԧࣇ࠻ז׌࣎ങˢݭ

͕᝙Νᝫጡ ( implantable cardioverter defibrillator, ICD ) Ъ׀ֹϡ CRT ۞ᓜԖྏរඕڍĂ CRT ౌѣ ӄٺഴ͌ങˢݭ͕᝙Νᝫጡٸ࿪۞ѨᇴĂ˵ಶߏ ഴ͌˞࡭׻ݭ͕ޠ̙ፋ൴Ϡ۞፟ົ

55,56

Ăҭ఺ሕ дّ۞યᗟืያซ˘Վࡁտᗃ୻Ą

ν͕ވו፬ٕᗕ͕ވו፬ĉ

Ϥٺତצ C RT ۞ঽଈкᇴߏνՁڑ็ጱܡ ᕝĂܑϯঽଈ۞ΠՁڑ็ጱߏ՟ѣᅪᘣ۞ĂЯѩ

̙͌ˠ͹ૺĂᑕྍಏϡν͕ވו፬ಶрĂΠ͕ވ

۞Νໂ̼ያঽˠҋ̎۞ His-Purkinje system Ξਕ

(6)

ົͧΠ͕ы۞ጱໂו፬ֽ଀ՀрĂͽҕҖજ˧ጯ តֽ̼៍၅ϲӈّ۞ត̼Ăቁ၁тѩ

57

Ă҃៍၅ ಏϡν͕ވו፬۞ঽˠĂྻજਕ˧̈́Ϡ߿ݡኳ˵

ౌѣځព۞Լච

58

Ă̙࿅Ă༊ᄃᗕ͕ވו፬࠹ͧ

ྵॡĂݒ࠻̙΍ኡᐹኡК

59

Ă҃ѣֱࡁտ݋ពϯ ң۰ྵᐹ˜Яˠ҃ள

60

ćϤٺಏϡν͕ވו፬Ϊ

ֹϡ˘୧ጱໂĂ̙გдјώ˯ă͘ఙ۞ኑᗔޘ

˯ĂΪࢋν͕ވו፬̙ͧᗕ͕ވו፬मĂಏϡν

͕ވו፬ಶΞਕјࠎϏֽ۞ᔌ๕ć B-LEFT HF

61

ͽ̈́ DECREASE-HF

62

ߏ׌࣎ϒдซҖ̚۞ᓜԖ

ྏរĂϫ۞ӈдଣ੅఺࣎યᗟĂд̙˳۞૟ֽಶ

ົѣྋඍĄ ጱໂ۞Ҝཉ

ν͕ވጱໂ۞ཉٸҜཉ˵ߏ࣎ᇆᜩ C RT ड़ ਕ۞Я৵Ăтڍਕ૟ጱໂٸдќᒺ౵୎۞ડ๴Ă நኢ˯ड़ڍᑕྍົ౵рĂ҃Ϥٺ౵୎ќᒺ۞ડ๴

Яˠ҃ளĂٙͽ౵ዋ༊۞Ҝཉᄃ௡Ъ˵༊൒Яˠ

҃ளćҭϤٺ͕᝙ᐖਔ۞̶οѣࢨĂٕߏѣֱડ

๴ΞਕЯࠎញჯ̼඀ޘྵᚑࢦ҃൑ڱజ߿̼Ă఺

ֱଐڶౌົֹ଀ጱໂ൑ڱٸдࣧώᄮࠎ౵நຐ۞

ҜཉĂ̂࡭ᄲֽĂ઎ጨ݈ͧጨр

63

Ă҃ޢጨᄃ઎

ጨ݋म̙к

64

Ą

Π͕ވጱໂ۞ཉٸҜཉ၆ C RT ۞ड़ਕҬͼ

˵ᑕྍѣᇆᜩĂѣˠ૟Π͕ы۞ጱໂொז͕ވ̚

ჽ఍ ( right ventricular septum )Ă൴ன఺ᇹו፬۞

ड़ڍ͕ͧыֽ۞р

65

Ăҭ van Campen ඈˠᄮࠎĂ

ٙᏜ۞౵ዋҜཉᑕྍߏЯˠ҃ள

66

Ăϫ݈إϏѣ ВᙊĂ҃ᅮซ˘Վࡁտֽᗃ୻Ą

Ҍٺ͕ٗ۞ጱໂ˘ਠౌߏ̺дΠ͕ٗ҅ĂЯ ࠎ ఺ ᇹ ۞ ߛ ၹ ౵ ࠎ ᘦ ؠ Ă ൒ ҃ ன д ѣ ٙ Ꮬ ۞ screw-in ۞ጱໂĂŇᘦؠŇ̙ГߏཉٸጱໂҜཉ

઱˘۞҂ณĂѣˠ૟͕ٗ۞ጱໂᗆд͕ٗ̚࿣

˯Ăຐឰν͕ٗᄃΠ͕ٗ۞ќᒺྵࠎТՎĂҭड़ ڍҬͼ̙֭т࿰ഇ

67

Ą

͕͕ٗވؼᏵॡม ( AV delay ) ۞నؠ

χଂ 1999 ѐĂ Auricchio ඈˠ൴ன֭൑ٙ

ᏜŇ౵ዋ༊Ň۞͕͕ٗވؼᏵॡมĂ҃ߏЯˠ҃

ளޢ

57

ĂЧёЧᇹ۞ࢍზᄃనؠ̳ё৾৾΍᝕Ă ဦ˘Ĉঽଈങˢ CRT ༼ޠጡޢ۞਒ొ X ЍဦĄΞͽ࠻

֍Π͕ٗĞ ȋğăΠ͕ވĞ Ȍğăν͕ވ( C ) ጱ ໂĄ

ဦ˟Ĉঽଈങˢ CRT ༼ޠጡ݈ޢ۞͕࿪ဦĄ CRT ݈Ă

͕࿪ဦពϯԆБّνՁڑܡᕝć CRT ޢĂ͕࿪

ဦពϯ QRS ត৫Ăͷ QRS คᖼШঽଈΠ˯͞Ą

(7)

̙ҭтѩĂ Verbeek ඈˠՀ೩΍౵ዋ༊۞͕͕ٗ

ވؼᏵॡมົצጱໂו፬Ҝཉ̙Т҃ѣमள

68

Ă Հᆧΐనؠ۞ኑᗔّĂѣˠϡ߹གྷ͹જਔ۞ҕ߹

ి-ॡม᎕ ( aortic velocity-time index, aortic VTI )

69

ă ѣˠ៍၅߹གྷဃಽᘝҕ߹߹ి۞ᙷݭ ( mitral in- flow wave form )

70

ăѣˠϡ߹གྷဃಽᘝ۞ҕ߹ి- ॡม᎕ ( mitral inflow velocity-time index, mitral in- flow VTI )

71

ăѣˠϡ͕҉˧ณ޽ᇴ ( myocardial power index, MPI )

72

Ăព൒ϫ݈֭൑ВᙊĂ̙࿅

ॲፂ Jansen ඈˠϡܬˢّጱგീณ۞ඕڍĂҬͼ ဃಽᘝҕ߹۞ҕ߹ి-ॡม᎕ົͧ͹જਔ۞ҕ߹

ి-ॡม᎕Հਕ΃ܑν͕ވ۞ +dP/dt

71

Ăҭѩඕኢ

̪ืГរᙋĄ

ν͕ވᄃΠ͕ވؼᏵॡม ( VV delay ) ۞నؠ кᆧΐ˞ν͕ވጱໂ̝ޢĂΠ͕ވᄃν͕ވ ו፬۞ॡมึԔ˵ߏ࣎યᗟĂ CRT ࣣ˯ξॡĂ ν͕ވᄃΠ͕ވߏ˘੓ו፬۞ ( simultaneous pac- ing )Ă఺ᇹҬͼ̖௑ЪТՎ̼۞ࣧ݋Ăҭߏ˘ֱ

̈ݭࡁտ൴னአፋν͕ވᄃΠ͕ވו፬۞ॡมम Ξͽͧ׌۰Тॡו፬ᆧΐՀк۞ν͕ड΍தă͕

Ꮾ΍ᓁณăනૺഇ·๱ॡม ( diastolic filling time )ă Լච̙ТՎ޽ᇴ ( dyssynchrony index )

73-75

ăࢫҲဃ ಽᘝਗ਼߹ᚑࢦޘĂᆧΐצᑅ˧ॡ۞ТՎّ

9,73,76

ć

҃ͷ౵ዋ༊۞ν͕ވᄃΠ͕ވม࿣˜Яˠ҃ளĂ צጱໂ۞ཉٸҜཉͽ̈́ঽˠώ֗۞ٗވඕېڶᇆ ᜩĂͷཉٸΗѐޢĂ౵ዋ༊۞ؼᏵॡมࣃΞਕົ

ѣត̼ĂᅮГአፋćϫ݈׌࣎ྵ̂ݭ੫၆఺࣎ᛉ ᗟ۞ᓜԖࡁտ۞ඕڍ׎၁ߏѣڡள۞Ă InSync III

੠ᖸঽˠ̱࣎͡۞ᓜԖাې̈́ྻજ˧Ăᄮࠎν͕

ވᄃΠ͕ވ۞ו፬ॡมᑕѣम෼ ( sequential pacing )

ͧྵр

77

Ăҭ RHYTHM II ݒᄮࠎ׌۰рᗼ֭൑

मள

78

Ă఺༊൒ѣΞਕߏޢ۰۞ঽּᇴྵ͌ ( 422 v.s.121 )Ă࠻̙΍मளĂՀซ˘Վ۞̂ݭࡁտቁ ၁ѣ׎υࢋّĂ DECREASE-HF trial ૟ঽଈ̶ј ˬ௡Ăଣ੅ᗕ͕ވТॡו፬ăѣॡมАޢ۞ו

፬ͽ̈́ಏϡν͕ވו፬Ă੠ᖸˬ௡ঽଈ۞ᓜԖ

াېͽ͕̈́᝙វ᎕ត̼Ăԓ୕Ξͽྋՙтѩۋ ኢ̙Ѓ۞ྖᗟĂலౣĂአፋν͕ވᄃΠ͕ވؼ Ᏽॡมमᅮࢋ෹ࢰگጯछᄃ࿪ϠநጯछВТે

ҖĂтڍአ̙አፋ̙֭ᇆᜩЇң࿰ޢĂ˫ңυ кѩ˘ᓝ׸ĉ

࿰ീֱࣹঽଈΞͽԼච ( responder )

ֱࣹˠᑕତצ C R T ڼᒚĉ఺ߏ࣎ܧ૱ࢦ

ࢋĂ˵ߏϫ݈ܧ૱ሤܝ۞ྖᗟâ͞ࢬ༊൒ߏЯ ࠎ CRT ಏᆊ੼Ă҃Ω˘͞ࢬĂ׎၁˵ߏՀࢦࢋ

۞ࣧЯĂಶߏ̙֭ߏٙѣ۞ঽˠౌົצ೎ĂࠤҌ ѣ͌ొ̶۞ঽˠд߉ͽ CRT ޢĂᓜԖ˯҃ͅົ

ೋ̼Ăࠎ˞ͽ౵͌۞ᗁᒚྤ໚ആঽˠᏖפ౵̂۞

჊ӀĂԱ΍ֱ֤߉ͽ CRT ޢົѣԼච۞ঽˠព

଀ॾγࢦࢋĂӈٙᏜ۞ responder Ąᔵ൒ϫ݈੫ ၆ responder ۞ࡁտซҖ۞тͫтఊĂҭϤٺ̂

छֹٙϡ۞ responder ؠཌྷ൞ༀ႕ϫĂѣ෹ࢰگ

۞ត̼ăᓜԖাې۞Լචă˵ѣѪ˸த̈́Гҝੰ

த۞ഴ͌Ăጱ࡭ϫ݈ᔵ൒̏གྷ̂࡭ᄮؠ mechani- cal dyssynchrony ᄃ electrical dyssynchrony ̙ਕ˘

ໄ҃ኢ

79

Ă෹ࢰگ۞ mechanical dyssynchrony Ҭ ͼՀਕ΃ܑ͕᝙̙ТՎ۞ଐԛĂ˵ՀਕᏰᙊ΍ྵ

Ξਕົצৈ۞ঽଈĂҭಶϫ݈ࠎͤĂ̪൒̙೷ਨ தԯڼᒚ໤݋྆ࢬ۞ QRS ᆵ̂ٺ 130 ୮ࡋԼј

෹ࢰگ˯۞̙ТՎ޽ᇴ ( dyssynchrony index )Ą

͕࿪ဦ΃ܑ۞ߏ͕᝙۞࿪ঈੈཱིĂϤٺ็ጱ ᅪᘣͽҌٺ QRS duration ࿅ᆵĂຐ༊൒ႬĂྵ୎

଀ז࿪ঈੈཱི۞͕᝙ડ๴༊൒ົؼᏵќᒺĂ҃఺

࣎ໄهགྷ࿅ྏរᙋ၁

8 0

˵˘ۡдᓜԖ˯ڻϡҌ

̫ĂϤᓜԖགྷរ۞៍၅Ăԧࣇۢ྽Ăಏϡ͕࿪ဦ үࠎ޽ᇾ̙֭ૉ

81

ĂٺߏΞᑭീ͕᝙̙ТՎ޽ᇴ

۞෹ࢰگಶјࠎϫ݈ࡁտ౵к۞̍׍ĄϤ݈ࢬଣ

੅ CRT ၆͕᝙ТՎّᇆᜩ۞߱རĂ᝝۰ಶΞͽ

˞ྋĂΞֹϡ۞޽ᇾ࠹༊кĂ Yu ඈˠд 2004 ѐ

૟ 18 ჌Ϥ็௚෹ࢰگ̈́௡ᖐౌ˪ઙ෹ࢰگ଀ז

۞޽ᇾोֽઇͧྵĂ࠻࠻ࣹ࣎޽ᇾ౵ਕ࿰ീν͕

ވ ड ΍ த ͽ ̈́ ν ͕ ވ Г ๬ ݭ ۞ Լ ච Ă ඕ ڍ Ϥ 2003 ѐ Yu ҋ౹۞޽ᇾ౼΍ ( 12 ࣎ડ๴ electrome- chanical delay ۞ᇾ໤म )

82

ĂҭϤٺν͕ވड΍த

۞Լචٕߏν͕ވГ๬ݭ ( remodeling ) ۞ត̼ல

ౣ̙ਕԆБ΃ܑঽˠৌϒ۞ᓜԖېڶĂซҖ̚۞

PROSPECT trial ૟੠ᖸ۞޽ᇾԼࠎঽˠᓜԖাې ᄃྻજ˧Ăԓ୕Ξͽྋՙ఺࣎རम

83

Ą

ੵ˞෹ࢰگγĂ׎΁۞ᇆညԫఙ˵അϡֽྏ

រ၆ٺ responder ۞࿰ീّĂΒ߁ϒ̄ٸड࿪ཝ

ᕝᆸବೡ ( positron emission tomography, PET ) ࠻

Π͕ވٕν͕ވ۞΃ᔁăಏЍ̄ٸड࿪ཝᕝᆸବ

(8)

ೡ ( Single-photon emission computed tomography, SPECT )࠻͕҉᛿߹඀ޘă၆ّ͕ͧ᝙෹ࢰگ( my- ocardial contrast echo ) ࠻͕҉۞߿ّ ( viability )Ăࠤ Ҍѣˠ൴ځགྷࢴ྽ٕགྷጱგᇶॡّጱໂĂֽۡତ

៍ീঽଈ۞͕᝙ΑਕߏӎົѣԼචГֽՙؠࢋ̙

ࢋങˢ CRT ༼ޠጡĂ఺ֱౌᔘдࡁտล߱Ă̙

࿅Ϥϒ̄ٸड࿪ཝᕝᆸବೡ̈́၆ّ͕ͧ᝙෹ࢰگ

۞ࡁտĂԧࣇΞͽፑྋĂᚑࢦ݄ېજਔ়ঽ͔ٙ

੓۞͕᝙਽აĂ೼ֽ࿆ᄲĂ၆ CRT ۞ͅᑕͧྵ

मĂ҃ᖣϤ఺ֱଣീ͕҉х߿ޘ۞̍׍ĂٕధΞ ͽԼච఺ཏঽଈ၆ CRT ۞ड़ڍĄ

CRT дܧνՁڑܡᕝঽଈ֗˯۞֎Ғ

Egoavil ඈˠፋந MIRACLE ̈́ Contak CD t r i a l ྆ΠՁڑԆБܡᕝ۞ঽˠĂ̙გߏᓜԖা

ېăྻજ˧ă͕᝙ќᒺ˧ăϹຏৠགྷ߿ّĂҬͼ

ౌ՟ѣ̦ᆃԼච

84

ć҃ Garrigue ඈˠ݋ᄮࠎтڍ

͕̈߄ᏴঽଈĂ෹ࢰگ˯ӔனТՎ̼޽ᇴम۞ঽ ˠᔘߏΞਕѣᑒӄ

85

Ą

݈ࢬഅགྷ೩࿅Ă͕࿪ဦ՟ѣᏱڱԆБܑன͕

᝙ќᒺ۞̙ТՎĂٙͽ QRS ᆵ۞ঽˠ̪ѣΞਕ ѣإр۞ТՎّĂ҃јࠎٙᏜ۞ n o n - r e s p o n - der ć̝ͅĂ͕࿪ဦϒ૱۞ঽˠ݋ѣΞਕ̙ТՎ

۞ଐڶ࠹༊ᚑࢦĂ Turner ඈˠྏ඾д͕࿪ဦ࠻Ҭ ϒ૱ҭ෹ࢰگពϯ̙ТՎଐڶᚑࢦ۞͕᝙਽აঽ ଈങˢ CRT Ăͽങˢޢ۞ТՎّ޽ᇾֽ࠻Ҭѣ ซՎ

7

ĂҭৌϒᓜԖېڶ۞੠ᖸྤफ़ݒߏଂ৿Ă ЯѩĂ CRT ၆ٺ QRS ᆵޘϒ૱ҭ͕᝙਽აঽଈ

۞֎ҒĂ̪ѣޞซ˘Վࡁտᗃ୻Ą

CRT ۞ܢΐΑਕ

C RT ༼ޠጡϫ݈ѣ˘࣎̏ࡁ൴ҭ̪Ϗགྷ̂

ఢሀࡁտ۞ΑਕĂჍү਒ට࿪ܡႾീᆇ ( i n - trathoracic impedance monitoring )ĂᖣϤ੠ᖸ਒၏

̰۞࿪ܡֽଯᕝঽˠ۱̰᎕ͪ۞ଐԛĂ̈́ѝග̟

ঽଈ೩ᏹĂԓ୕ਕ྿ז̈́ѝ఍ཉͽഴ͌ҝੰ፟த

۞ड़ڍ

86

Ăϫ݈఺࣎Αਕ၆ٺᓜԖ໰᜕۞ᑒӄᔘ ѣޞ៍၅Ăୂຏޘ̈́໤ቁّ˵ѣޞԼซĂҭҬͼ ߏ࣎ޝр۞ࡎ৔ĂԧࣇΞͽഇ୕ιϏֽ۞൴णĄ

ඕኢ

C RT ߏ͕᝙਽აڼᒚ̚ܧᘽۏ۞ڼᒚ͞ڱ

̝˘Ăι۞Αड़̏གྷдధк۞ᓜԖྏរ̚జᙋ ၁Ă҃ι۞ᓜԖᑕϡ˵ు͟дᆧΐ̚Ăҭ౵ָ۞

ТՎ̼޽ᇾזغࠎңĉтң࿰ീ r e s p o n d e r ĉ C RT ώ֗۞నؠăጱໂཉٸ۞ҜཉĂߏӎѣ౵

р۞ᇾ໤ĉߏӎᑕᕖ̂ CRT ۞ዋᑕাүࠎ̈́ѝ

࿰֨۞ඉரĉͽ̈́ٙࢉϠ΍۞࠹ᙯགྷᑻયᗟඈ ඈĂౌѣޞՀк࠹ᙯˠࣶ۞ԸˢĂ̖ਕ၆ C RT ѣՀ౅ၔ۞˞ྋĄ

ણ҂͛ᚥ

1.Forrester JS, Wyatt HL, Da Luz PL, Tyberg JV, Diamond GA, Swan HJ. Functional significance of regional ischemic contrac- tion abnormalities. Circulation 1976; 54: 64-70.

2.Miyazawa K, Shirato K, Haneda T, Honna T, Arai T. Effects of pacing location on coronary circulation in dogs. Tohoku J Exp Med 1977; 121: 149-56.

3.Kawaguchi M, Murabayashi T, Fetics BJ, et al. Quantitation of basal dyssynchrony and acute resynchronization from left or biventricular pacing by novel echo-contrast variability imaging.

J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 2052-8.

4.Sogaard P, Kim WY, Jensen HK, et al. Impact of acute biven- tricular pacing on left ventricular performance and volumes in patients with severe heart failure. A tissue doppler and three-di- mensional echocardiographic study. Cardiology 2001; 95: 173- 82.

5.Schuster P, Faerestrand S, Ohm OJ. Colour tissue velocity imag- ing can show resynchronisation of longitudinal left ventricular contraction pattern by biventricular pacing in patients with se- vere heart failure. Heart 2003; 89: 859-64.

6.Ansalone G, Giannantoni P, Ricci R, et al. Doppler myocardial imaging in patients with heart failure receiving biventricular pacing treatment. Am Heart J 2001; 142: 881-96.

7.Turner MS, Bleasdale RA, Vinereanu D, et al. Electrical and me- chanical components of dyssynchrony in heart failure patients with normal QRS duration and left bundle-branch block: impact of left and biventricular pacing. Circulation 2004; 109: 2544-9.

8.Yu CM, Chau E, Sanderson JE, et al. Tissue Doppler echocar- diographic evidence of reverse remodeling and improved syn- chronicity by simultaneously delaying regional contraction af- ter biventricular pacing therapy in heart failure. Circulation 2002; 105: 438-45.

9.Bordachar P, Lafitte S, Reuter S, et al. Echocardiographic pa- rameters of ventricular dyssynchrony validation in patients with heart failure using sequential biventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 2157-65.

10.Dohi K, Suffoletto MS, Schwartzman D, Ganz L, Pinsky MR,

Gorcsan J, 3rd. Utility of echocardiographic radial strain imag-

ing to quantify left ventricular dyssynchrony and predict acute

response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol

2005; 96: 112-6.

(9)

11.Kuhl HP, Schreckenberg M, Rulands D, et al. High-resolution transthoracic real-time three-dimensional echocardiography:

quantitation of cardiac volumes and function using semi-auto- matic border detection and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 2083-90.

12.Krenning BJ, Szili-Torok T, Voormolen MM, et al. Guiding and optimization of resynchronization therapy with dynamic three- dimensional echocardiography and segmental volume--time curves: a feasibility study. Eur J Heart Fail 2004; 6: 619-25.

13.Kapetanakis S, Kearney MT, Siva A, Gall N, Cooklin M, Monaghan MJ. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography:

a novel technique to quantify global left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony. Circulation 2005; 112: 992-1000.

14.Breithardt OA, Stellbrink C, Kramer AP, et al. Echocardio- graphic quantification of left ventricular asynchrony predicts an acute hemodynamic benefit of cardiac resynchronization thera- py. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 536-45.

15.Steendijk P, Tulner SA, Bax JJ, et al. Hemodynamic effects of long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy: analysis by pres- sure-volume loops. Circulation 2006; 113: 1295-304.

16.Boriani G, Saporito D, Biffi M, et al. Acute and chronic haemo- dynamic effects of biventricular pacing and of switching to dif- ferent pacing modalities in heart failure patients. Int J Cardiol 2006; 110: 318-23.

17.Knight BP, Desai A, Coman J, Faddis M, Yong P. Long-term re- tention of cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 72-7.

18.St John Sutton MG, Plappert T, Abraham WT, et al. Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular size and function in chronic heart failure. Circulation 2003; 107: 1985- 90.

19.Abraham WT, Young JB, Leon AR, et al. Effects of cardiac resyn- chronization on disease progression in patients with left ven- tricular systolic dysfunction, an indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and mildly symptomatic chronic heart failure. Circulation 2004; 110: 2864-8.

20.Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1539-49.

21.Toussaint JF, Lavergne T, Kerrou K, et al. Basal asynchrony and resynchronization with biventricular pacing predict long-term improvement of LV function in heart failure patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003; 26: 1815-23.

22.Donal E, Vignat N, De Place C, et al. Acute effects of biven- tricular pacing on right ventricular function assessed by tissue Doppler imaging. Europace 2007; 9: 108-12.

23.Nelson GS, Berger RD, Fetics BJ, et al. Left ventricular or biven- tricular pacing improves cardiac function at diminished energy cost in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle- branch block. Circulation 2000; 102: 3053-9.

24.Knaapen P, van Campen LM, de Cock CC, et al. Effects of car- diac resynchronization therapy on myocardial perfusion reserve.

Circulation 2004; 110: 646-51.

25.D'Ascia C, Cittadini A, Monti MG, Riccio G, Sacca L. Effects of biventricular pacing on interstitial remodelling, tumor necro- sis factor-alpha expression, and apoptotic death in failing hu- man myocardium. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 201-6.

26.Adamson PB, Kleckner KJ, VanHout WL, Srinivasan S, Abraham WT. Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves heart rate variability in patients with symptomatic heart failure.

Circulation 2003; 108: 266-9.

27.Najem B, Unger P, Preumont N, et al. Sympathetic control after cardiac resynchronization therapy: responders versus nonre- sponders. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006; 291: H2647- 52.

28.Rubaj A, Rucinski P, Rejdak K, et al. Biventricular versus right ventricular pacing decreases immune activation and augments nitric oxide production in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2006; 8: 615-20.

29.Gabor JY, Newman DA, Barnard-Roberts V, et al. Improvement in Cheyne-Stokes respiration following cardiac resynchronisa- tion therapy. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 95-100.

30.Varma C, Sharma S, Firoozi S, McKenna WJ, Daubert JC.

Atriobiventricular pacing improves exercise capacity in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 582-8.

31.Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, et al. Cardiac resynchro- nization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1845- 53.

32.Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Sack S, et al. Long-term clinical ef- fect of hemodynamically optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and ventricular conduction delay. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 2026-33.

33.Linde C, Leclercq C, Rex S, et al. Long-term benefits of biven- tricular pacing in congestive heart failure: results from the MUltisite STimulation in cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 111-8.

34.Young JB, Abraham WT, Smith AL, et al. Combined cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioversion defibrillation in advanced chronic heart failure: the MIRACLE ICD Trial.

Jama 2003; 289: 2685-94.

35.Bradley DJ, Bradley EA, Baughman KL, et al. Cardiac resyn- chronization and death from progressive heart failure: a meta- analysis of randomized controlled trials. Jama 2003; 289: 730- 40.

36.Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, et al. Cardiac-resynchro- nization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2140- 50.

37.Carson P, Anand I, O'Connor C, et al. Mode of death in advanced heart failure: the Comparison of Medical, Pacing, and Defibrillation Therapies in Heart Failure (COMPANION) trial.

J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 2329-34.

38.Bentkover JD, Dorian P, Thibault B, Gardner M. Economic anal- ysis of a randomized trial of biventricular pacing in Canada.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007; 30: 38-43.

(10)

39.Leon AR, Greenberg JM, Kanuru N, et al. Cardiac resynchro- nization in patients with congestive heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation: effect of upgrading to biventricular pacing af- ter chronic right ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39:

1258-63.

40.Molhoek SG, Bax JJ, Bleeker GB, et al. Comparison of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with sinus rhythm versus chronic atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94:

1506-9.

41.Brignole M, Gammage M, Puggioni E, et al. Comparative as- sessment of right, left, and biventricular pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 712-22.

42.Doshi RN, Daoud EG, Fellows C, et al. Left ventricular-based cardiac stimulation post AV nodal ablation evaluation (the PAVE study). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005; 16: 1160-5.

43.Hay I, Melenovsky V, Fetics BJ, et al. Short-term effects of right- left heart sequential cardiac resynchronization in patients with heart failure, chronic atrial fibrillation, and atrioventricular nodal block. Circulation 2004; 110: 3404-10.

44.Gasparini M, Auricchio A, Regoli F, et al. Four-year efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy on exercise tolerance and dis- ease progression: the importance of performing atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 734-43.

45.Bordachar P, Garrigue S, Lafitte S, et al. Interventricular and in- tra-left ventricular electromechanical delays in right ventricular paced patients with heart failure: implications for upgrading to biventricular stimulation. Heart 2003; 89: 1401-5.

46.Witte KK, Pipes RR, Nanthakumar K, Parker JD. Biventricular pacemaker upgrade in previously paced heart failure patients-- improvements in ventricular dyssynchrony. J Card Fail 2006;

12: 199-204.

47.Ritter O, Koller ML, Fey B, et al. Progression of heart failure in right univentricular pacing compared to biventricular pacing. Int J Cardiol 2006; 110: 359-65.

48.Martinelli M, Costa R, de Siqueira SF, Ramires JA. COMBAT-- conventional versus multisite pacing for bradyarrhythmia ther- apy: rationale of a prospective randomized multicenter study.

Eur J Heart Fail 2005; 7: 219-24.

49.Medina-Ravell VA, Lankipalli RS, Yan GX, et al. Effect of epi- cardial or biventricular pacing to prolong QT interval and in- crease transmural dispersion of repolarization: does resynchro- nization therapy pose a risk for patients predisposed to long QT or torsade de pointes? Circulation 2003; 107: 740-6.

50.Mykytsey A, Maheshwari P, Dhar G, et al. Ventricular tachy- cardia induced by biventricular pacing in patient with severe is- chemic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005; 16:

655-8.

51.Bai R, Yang XY, Song Y, et al. Impact of left ventricular epi- cardial and biventricular pacing on ventricular repolarization in normal-heart individuals and patients with congestive heart fail- ure. Europace 2006; 8: 1002-10.

52.Chalil S, Yousef ZR, Muyhaldeen SA, et al. Pacing-induced in-

crease in QT dispersion predicts sudden cardiac death follow- ing cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;

47: 2486-92.

53.Berger T, Hanser F, Hintringer F, et al. Effects of cardiac resyn- chronization therapy on ventricular repolarization in patients with congestive heart failure. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005;

16: 611-7.

54.Santangelo L, Ammendola E, Russo V, et al. Influence of biven- tricular pacing on myocardial dispersion of repolarization in di- lated cardiomyopathy patients. Europace 2006; 8: 502-5.

55.Arya A, Haghjoo M, Dehghani MR, et al. Effect of cardiac resyn- chronization therapy on the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Heart Rhythm 2005; 2: 1094-8.

56.Voigt A, Barrington W, Ngwu O, Jain S, Saba S. Biventricular pacing reduces ventricular arrhythmic burden and defibrillator therapies in patients with heart failure. Clin Cardiol 2006; 29:

74-7.

57.Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Block M, et al. Effect of pacing cham- ber and atrioventricular delay on acute systolic function of paced patients with congestive heart failure. The Pacing Therapies for Congestive Heart Failure Study Group. The Guidant Congestive Heart Failure Research Group. Circulation 1999; 99: 2993-3001.

58.Blanc JJ, Bertault-Valls V, Fatemi M, Gilard M, Pennec PY, Etienne Y. Midterm benefits of left univentricular pacing in pa- tients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 2004; 109: 1741- 4.

59.Gasparini M, Bocchiardo M, Lunati M, et al. Comparison of 1- year effects of left ventricular and biventricular pacing in pa- tients with heart failure who have ventricular arrhythmias and left bundle-branch block: the Bi vs Left Ventricular Pacing: an International Pilot Evaluation on Heart Failure Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias (BELIEVE) multicenter prospective randomized pilot study. Am Heart J 2006; 152: 155 e1-7.

60.Jia P, Ramanathan C, Ghanem RN, Ryu K, Varma N, Rudy Y.

Electrocardiographic imaging of cardiac resynchronization ther- apy in heart failure: observation of variable electrophysiologic responses. Heart Rhythm 2006; 3: 296-310.

61.Leclercq C, Ansalone G, Gadler F, et al. Biventricular vs. left u- niventricular pacing in heart failure: rationale, design, and end- points of the B-LEFT HF study. Europace 2006; 8: 76-80.

62.De Lurgio DB, Foster E, Higginbotham MB, Larntz K, Saxon LA. A comparison of cardiac resynchronization by sequential biventricular pacing and left ventricular pacing to simultaneous biventricular pacing: rationale and design of the DECREASE- HF clinical trial. J Card Fail 2005; 11: 233-9.

63.Butter C, Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, et al. Effect of resynchro- nization therapy stimulation site on the systolic function of heart failure patients. Circulation 2001; 104: 3026-9.

64.Rossillo A, Verma A, Saad EB, et al. Impact of coronary sinus

lead position on biventricular pacing: mortality and echocar-

diographic evaluation during long-term follow-up. J Cardiovasc

Electrophysiol 2004; 15: 1120-5.

(11)

65.Riedlbauchova L, Cihak R, Bytesnik J, et al. Optimization of right ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronisation ther- apy. Eur J Heart Fail 2006; 8: 609-14.

66.van Campen CM, Visser FC, de Cock CC, Vos HS, Kamp O, Visser CA. Comparison of the haemodynamics of different pac- ing sites in patients undergoing resynchronisation treatment:

need for individualisation of lead localisation. Heart 2006; 92:

1795-800.

67.Di Pede F, Gasparini G, De Piccoli B, Yu Y, Cuesta F, Raviele A. Hemodynamic effects of atrial septal pacing in cardiac resyn- chronization therapy patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005; 16: 1273-8.

68.Verbeek XA, Vernooy K, Peschar M, Cornelussen RN, Prinzen FW. Intra-ventricular resynchronization for optimal left ven- tricular function during pacing in experimental left bundle branch block. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 558-67.

69.Sawhney NS, Waggoner AD, Garhwal S, Chawla MK, Osborn J, Faddis MN. Randomized prospective trial of atrioventricular delay programming for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm 2004; 1: 562-7.

70.Inoue N, Ishikawa T, Sumita S, et al. Long-term follow-up of atrioventricular delay optimization in patients with biventricular pacing. Circ J 2005; 69: 201-4.

71.Jansen AH, Bracke FA, van Dantzig JM, et al. Correlation of echo-Doppler optimization of atrioventricular delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy with invasive hemodynamics in pa- tients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic di- lated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 552-7.

72.Porciani MC, Dondina C, Macioce R, et al. Temporal variation in optimal atrioventricular and interventricular delay during car- diac resynchronization therapy. J Card Fail 2006; 12: 715-9.

73.Sogaard P, Egeblad H, Pedersen AK, et al. Sequential versus si- multaneous biventricular resynchronization for severe heart fail- ure: evaluation by tissue Doppler imaging. Circulation 2002;

106: 2078-84.

74.Burri H, Sunthorn H, Somsen A, et al. Optimizing sequential biventricular pacing using radionuclide ventriculography. Heart Rhythm 2005; 2: 960-5.

75.Vanderheyden M, De Backer T, Rivero-Ayerza M, et al. Tailored echocardiographic interventricular delay programming further optimizes left ventricular performance after cardiac resynchro- nization therapy. Heart Rhythm 2005; 2: 1066-72.

76.Bordachar P, Lafitte S, Reuter S, et al. Echocardiographic as- sessment during exercise of heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 1622-5.

77.Leon AR, Abraham WT, Brozena S, et al. Cardiac resynchro- nization with sequential biventricular pacing for the treatment of moderate-to-severe heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:

2298-304.

78.Boriani G, Muller CP, Seidl KH, et al. Randomized comparison of simultaneous biventricular stimulation versus optimized in- terventricular delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy. The Resynchronization for the HemodYnamic Treatment for Heart Failure Management II implantable cardioverter defibrillator (RHYTHM II ICD) study. Am Heart J 2006; 151: 1050-8.

79.Leclercq C, Faris O, Tunin R, et al. Systolic improvement and mechanical resynchronization does not require electrical syn- chrony in the dilated failing heart with left bundle-branch block.

Circulation 2002; 106: 1760-3.

80.Alonso C, Leclercq C, Victor F, et al. Electrocardiographic pre- dictive factors of long-term clinical improvement with multisite biventricular pacing in advanced heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 1417-21.

81.Ghio S, Constantin C, Klersy C, et al. Interventricular and in- traventricular dyssynchrony are common in heart failure pa- tients, regardless of QRS duration. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 571- 8.

82.Yu CM, Fung WH, Lin H, Zhang Q, Sanderson JE, Lau CP.

Predictors of left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure secondary to idio- pathic dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2003;

91: 684-8.

83.Yu CM, Abraham WT, Bax J, et al. Predictors of response to car- diac resynchronization therapy (PROSPECT)--study design.

Am Heart J 2005; 149: 600-5.

84.Egoavil CA, Ho RT, Greenspon AJ, Pavri BB. Cardiac resyn- chronization therapy in patients with right bundle branch block:

analysis of pooled data from the MIRACLE and Contak CD tri- als. Heart Rhythm 2005; 2: 611-5.

85.Garrigue S, Reuter S, Labeque JN, et al. Usefulness of biven- tricular pacing in patients with congestive heart failure and right bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 1436-41, A8.

86.Vollmann D, Nagele H, Schauerte P, et al. Clinical utility of in-

trathoracic impedance monitoring to alert patients with an im-

planted device of deteriorating chronic heart failure. Eur Heart

J 2007; 28: 1835-40.

(12)

A New Device Therapy for Heart Failure Treatment --- Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Chih-Chieh Yu, Jiunn-Lee Lin

1

, and Ling-Ping Lai

Congestive heart failure is a major burden in modern society. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) im- proves cardiac function by allowing the ventricle to contract in a synchronized mode. By breaking the vicious cy- cle of heart failure, CRT reverses cardiac remodeling and therefore increases heart contractility. Not only does CRT improve the symptoms of heart failure, but it also prolongs the survival of heart failure patients, as shown in clinical trials. All physicians, including primary care physicians, should know this new therapeutic option and be familiar with the related issues. ( J Intern Med Taiwan 2008; 19: 103- 114 )

Department of Internal Medicine,

National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch;

1

Department of Internal Medicine,

National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

參考文獻

相關文件

Introduction: Eagle’s syndrome is a rare condition that refers to chronic recurrent pain in the oropharynx, face, and neck due to elongation of the styloid process or calcification

showed that 36% of patients with oral histoplasmosis had concomitant active pulmonary tuberculosis, 18% had malignant neoplasia, 9% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 9%

申請全民健保處方及治療明細檔_門急診、全民健保處

• 對於接受靜脈血栓溶解劑治療的病患, 建議於治療前, 治療2 小時後, 治療24小時後, 治療7至10天後,

在使用Paxlovid治療的5天 療程完畢後再5天才開始 高血脂症或心血管疾病患者,有在服用史塔汀類的降膽固醇藥物(Statin) 例如: Simvastatin

A discussion of the Dapagli flozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease (DAPA-CKD) trial, the Effect of Sotagli flozin on Car- diovascular Events in Patients

Effectiveness of robot-assisted upper limb training on spasticity, function and muscle activity in chronic stroke patients treated with botulinum toxin: A randomized single-

SF15116A#6 張基晟 多中心、隨機分配的雙盲詴驗,探 討 Erlotinib 併用 Ramucirumab 或安