• 沒有找到結果。

全語言教學在國中英語課之實驗研究

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "全語言教學在國中英語課之實驗研究"

Copied!
22
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

*

86

( 87.5.13)

the Grammar-translation, Direct Method, the Audiolingual Method, Total Psysical Response, the

Suggestopedia (Richards et al., 1986)

Communicative Approach Natural Appraoch

( w h o l e l a n g u a g e approach) 80

( 84)

(2)

( ) ( )

( )

( )

(skills) 1980

(Goodman, 1986)

(whole language) J. A. Comenius

(The Orbis Pictus)

(whole world) (whole languaue) (

)

(Goodman, Y. M., 1989, p.113)

Harste Burke(1977) Harste

Burke

(indivisible)

1.

2.

( ) 3.

Manzo &

Manzo, 1995, P.46

(Hse, 1994)

(Weaver, 1990)

( 86)

(3)

(back to basics) Newman Church(1995) M u r p h y Hornstein(1995) ABC 1995 10 13

( )

( )

(whole-word) (look-say)

(language experience approach, LEA) 1960

(whole-word) (look-say)

1960

(Weaver, 1990; Weaver, 1997; Edelsky et al., 1991)

( )

(by osmosis)

risk)

(trade book)

( )

(anything goes)

(4)

( )

Weaver(1997)

1985

(mandate)

( )

(holistic education)

(Ediger, 1991) 1.

(5)

2.

3.

4.

5.

( )

Deway

(whole child) Deway

( 86)

( )

Vygotsky

Chomsky(1965)

LAD(Language Acquisition Device)

( )

1.

(K. Goodman, 1989)

( Z P D z o n e o f p r o x i m a l development

) ( 83)

2.

Church(1996)

ZPD

(6)

4.

(miscue)

5.

( )

(kid watchers) (teachers)

(Chen, Y., 1999)

1.

2. 15

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

(

86 De Carlo, 1995; Hui-lien, 1997; Watson, 1989;

Weaver, 1990) 1.

(Edelsky, 1992; Weaver, 1990)

2.

(Edelsky, 1992) K. Goodman (1986)

(Norris & Damico, 1990) 3.

4.

Waston(1989)

(7)

5.

(readiness)

(Weaver, 1990)

( )

1.

(Ibid.) 2.

K.Goodman(1986)

( )

2.

(Watson, 1989)

(Ibid.)

( )

1.

Foster(1994)

( N o r r i s &

Damico, 1990) Watson(1989)

(8)

2.

Watson(1989)

( ) (Chen, C., 1999; Shen &

Chang, 1999)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

( ) ESL/EFL

ESL(English as Second Language) FEL(English as Foreign Language)

EFL

(L1) ESL EFL

(Hedgecock & Pucci, 1994;Lems, 1995) EFL

EFL EFL

EFL

Ghosn(1996) EFL

L1 EFL

EFL EFL

TPR

(Adair-Hauck, 1996;

Chen, 1994; Lems, 1995)

Redmond(1994) ESL/EFL

EFL

EFL ( 88

Chen, C., 1999; Chen, Y., 1999; Shen &Chang,

(9)

1.

2.

3.

4.

( )

Chen(1992)

Tseng(1997a)

Tseng(1997b)

Li(1996) EFL

Chen, C. L.(1999)

( 89)

( )

( )

( )

( )

(89.3.1~6.30)

(10)

1

Y1 A Y3

Y2 B Y4

A B

Y1 Y2

Y3 Y4

( )

( 86)

Hsu(1986) English Language Motivation- Attitude Questionnaire of Chinese Junior High School Students Person (1980) Roger (1981) Clement Kruidenier(1983) Gardner(1985) Dornyei(1990)

4 3 2 1 1 2 3

4

205

(Cronbach )

.6317 .8577 Cronbach .

9067

( )

Oxford(1990a)

(SILL)(the revised Strategy Inventory for Language

Learning) SILL 1986

SILL

( 86) E-mail Oxford

4 3 2 1

225

(Cronbach ) .6030 .

(11)

(Cronbach ) .8154 .8807 Cronbach ( .9401

EFL

2

( )

( 82)

(

) (

)

Likert

4 3 2

1

230

2

mouth?

a /maus/?

b c d

mouse mouth

(12)

3 4

3

95.11 94.91

14.35 15.77

104.03 86.21

14.91 17.40

103.94 86.30

4

F

( ) 273.20 1 273.20 4.15*

( ) 4275.42 65 65.78

*p<.05

I must forgot

s I siad I can't ....(5.3 ) Today we have a

English test(5.8 ) Todey ....

(4.26 ) But I want to get a very good gread.(4.

19 )

3

(103.94)

(86.30) 4

(F=4.15, p<.

05)

5 6

5

65.60 65.24

20.70 24.58

69.40 64.44

18.69 24.40

(13)

6

F

( ) 258.90 1 258.90 14.22**

( ) 1183.13 65 18.20

**p<.01 5

(69.23)

(64.61) 6

(F=14.22, p<.

01)

7 8

7

109.86 104.59

10.38 26.09

119.20 100.44

10.20 25.65

116.77 102.94

8

F

( ) 334.28 1 334.28 9.46**

( ) 2296.84 65 35.34

7

(116.77)

(102.94) 8

(F=9.46, p<.01)

( )

( )

1. Today English teacher I

V. must forgot s I siad I can't forget s

but I have confidence. s.

2. teacher I

3. we I

4. I have a(an) English class, I am excited and happy.

5. I English newspaper I

hope

6. Today we

not

7. today teacher we

8. Today we have a(an) English test

(14)

( ) ( )

1.

2.

( )

1

2

3 Taiwan Student News

( )

EFL

(15)

( )

( )

( )

EFL

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

(16)

( 88)

( 86)

( 82)

( 83)

( 84) 8

52-53 ( 89)

( ) 2000 ~

(I)( 297-324 )

Chen, C. L. (1999). Documenting Whole Language Learners' Progress Through Publication. International Conference on ESL/EFL Literacies in the Asia-Pacific Region in Tunghai University.

Chen, J. (1992). An experimental study of whole language instruction and basal reader instruction for the junior high English as a second language(ESL) students in Taiwan, R.O.C. NC: UMI Company.

Chen, Y. M. (1999). The Teachers' Role and the Parents' Role in Whole Language. International Conference on ESL/

EFL Literacies in the Asia-Pacific Region in Tunghai University.

Clément, R.& Kruidenier, B. G. (1985). Orientations in sec- ond language acquisition: The effects of ethnicity, milieu, and target language on their emergence. Language Learning, 33(3), 273-91.

De Carlo, J. E. (Ed.). (1995). Perspectives in whole language.

US: Allyn & Bacon.

Dörnyei, Z.(1990). Conceptualizing motivation in foreign language learning. Language Learning, 40(1), 45-78.

Edelsky, C. (1992). Language arts topics and educational issue: Information sheets. (ERIC Document Reproduc-

Foster, H. M. (1994). Crossing over: Whole language for secondary English teachers. USA: Harcourt Brace.

Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second lan- guage learning : The role of attitudes and motivation.

London: Edward Arnold.

Goodman, K. (1986). What's whole in whole language?

Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Harste, J. C. (1991). How whole language got its name? In K.

S. Goodmen, L. B. Bird & Y. M. Goodman (Eds.), The whole language catalog (p.388). Santa Rosa: American School Publishers.

Hedgecock, J. & Pucci, S. (1994). Whole language application to ESL in secondary and higher education. TESOL Journal, 3(2), 22-26.

Hse, Yuehkuei.(1994). "Whole language, reading achievement, and the ESL student: Defitions and applications." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of SECOL and the Tennessee Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Lan- guages (Memphis, TN, April 7-9, 1994). (ERIC Docu- ment ED 375 614).

Hsu, J. M. (1986). Attitude, motivation and achievement in EFL: A case study of Chinese junior high school students.

Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.

Hui-lien, Chiang. (1997). Teaching College English with Feature Films: A Practical Implement of the Whole Lan- guage Approach. NKNU English Department master thesis.

Lems, K. (1995). Whole language and the ESL/EFL classroom.

(ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED384 210).

Manzo, A. V. & Manzo, U. C. (1995). Teaching children to be literate. Orlando, US: Harcourt Brace.

Norris, J. A. & Damico, J. S. (1990). Whole language in theory and practice: Implications for language intervention.

Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 21 (4), 212-20.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Pierson, H. D., Fu, G. S., & Lee, S. (1980). An analysis of the

(17)

tainment of secondary students in Hong Kong. Language Learning, 30, 289-316.

Roger, D., Bull, P., & Fletcher, R. (1981). The construction and validation of a questionnaire for measuring attitudes towards learning foreign languages. Educational Review, 33, 223-30.

Shen, T. C. & Chang, S. I. (1999). Applying Whole Language in EFL Classrooms: Some Theoretical and Practical Considerations. International Conference on ESL/EFL Literacies in the Asia-Pacific Region in Tunghai University.

Tseng, Y. H. (1997a). Attacking Methodology: EFL whole language in a Taiwanese Classroom. Proceedings of the Fourteen Conference on English Teaching and Learning

in the Republic of China. Complied by Department of English, NTNU. Taipei, The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.

Tseng, Y. H. (1997b). Whole language for beginners in the EFL classroom. Proceedings of the sixth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 531-40). Taipei, R.O.C., The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.

Waston, D. J. (1989). Defining and describing whole language. The Elementary School Journal, 90(2), 129-42.

Weaver, C. (1990). Understanding whole language: from principles to practice. Portsouth, NH: Heinemann.

90 5 17

90 6 20

90 8 14

43-1

(18)

Abstract

The study was conducted to (a)develop a model of whole language teaching that is suitable for junior high English classes; (b)compare the differences between whole language and traditional teaching in terms of English learning motivation, English learning strategies, and classroom climate; (c)look into the difficulties in the teaching process and suggest ways to solve the problems; and (d)demonstrate and evaluate students' learning process through portfolio assessment. 69 1st-grade students(2 classes) selected from Kuan-Rung Junior High School in Taichung county, served as the subjects of the study, with one class as the experi- mental group and the other as the control group. The subjects were required to respond to

"English Learning Motivation Inventory", "English Learning Strategy Inventory", and "Class- room Climate Inventory" questionnaires. The findings were as follows: (a)There was differ- ence in terms of English learning motivation between the two groups; (b)There was differ- ence in terms of English learning strategies between the two groups; and (c)there was differ- ence in terms of classroom climate between the two groups as well. Additionally, this study offered some suggestions for the implementation of whole language teaching and showed parts of the samples of portfolio assessment.

Key words: English teaching of junior high portfolio assessment whole language teaching

The Empirical Study of Whole Language Teaching in English Class of Junior High

*

Yu-Ju Chang Sieh-Hwa Lin

Kwan-Rung Junior High School Department of Education Psychology & Counseling National Taiwan Normal University

(19)

1. --- 1 2 3 4 2. --- 1 2 3 4 3. --- 1 2 3 4 4. --- 1 2 3 4

5. --- 1 2 3 4

6. --- 1 2 3 4 7. --- 1 2 3 4 8. --- 1 2 3 4 9. --- 1 2 3 4 10. --- 1 2 3 4 11. --- 1 2 3 4 12. --- 1 2 3 4

13. --- 1 2 3 4

14. --- 1 2 3 4

15. --- 1 2 3 4 16. --- 1 2 3 4

17. --- 1 2 3 4

18. --- 1 2 3 4

19. --- 1 2 3 4

20. --- 1 2 3 4 21. --- 1 2 3 4

22. --- 1 2 3 4

23. --- 1 2 3 4 24. --- 1 2 3 4 25. --- 1 2 3 4 26. --- 1 2 3 4

27. --- 1 2 3 4

28. --- 1 2 3 4

29. --- 1 2 3 4

30. --- 1 2 3 4 31. --- 1 2 3 4 32. --- 1 2 3 4 33. --- 1 2 3 4 34. --- 1 2 3 4

(20)

1. --- 1 2 3 4

2. --- 1 2 3 4

3. --- 1 2 3 4

4. --- 1 2 3 4

5. --- 1 2 3 6. --- 1 2 3 4

7. --- 1 2 3 4

8. --- 1 2 3 4

9. --- 1 2 3 4

10. --- 1 2 3 4

11. --- 1 2 3 4

12. --- 1 2 3 4

13. --- 1 2 3 4

14. --- 1 2 3 4

15. --- 1 2 3 4

16. --- 1 2 3 4

17. --- 1 2 3 4

18. --- 1 2 3 4 19. --- 1 2 3 4

20. --- 1 2 3 4

21. --- 1 2 3 4

22. --- 1 2 3 4

23. --- 1 2 3 4

24. --- 1 2 3 4

25. --- 1 2 3 4

26. --- 1 2 3 4 27. --- 1 2 3 4 28. --- 1 2 3 4

1. --- 1 2 3 4 2. --- 1 2 3 4

(21)

4. ---1 2 3 4

5. ---1 2 3 4

6. ---1 2 3 4 7. ---1 2 3 4 8. ---1 2 3 4 9. ---1 2 3 4

10. ---1 2 3 4

11. ---1 2 3 4

12. ---1 2 3 4

13. ---1 2 3 4

14. ---1 2 3 4 15. ---1 2 3 4

16. ---1 2 3 4

17. ---1 2 3 4

18. ---1 2 3 4

19. ---1 2 3 4 20. ---1 2 3 4

21. ---1 2 3 4

22. ---1 2 3 4 23. ---1 2 3 4

24. ---1 2 3 4

25. ---1 2 3 4

26. ---1 2 3 4

27. ---1 2 3 4

28. ---1 2 3 4

29. ---1 2 3 4

30. ---1 2 3 4 31. ---1 2 3 4 32. ---1 2 3 4

33. ---1 2 3 4

34. ---1 2 3 4

35. ---1 2 3 4

36. ---1 2 3 4

37. ---1 2 3 4

38. ---1 2 3 4

39. ---1 2 3 4

40. ---1 2 3 4

(22)

參考文獻

相關文件

• e-Learning Series: Effective Use of Multimodal Materials in Language Arts to Enhance the Learning and Teaching of English at the Junior Secondary Level. Language across

Building on the strengths of students and considering their future learning needs, plan for a Junior Secondary English Language curriculum to gear students towards the learning

• e‐Learning Series: Effective Use of Multimodal Materials in Language Arts to Enhance the Learning and Teaching of English at the Junior Secondary Level. Language across

 develop a better understanding of the design and the features of the English Language curriculum with an emphasis on the senior secondary level;..  gain an insight into the

Building on the strengths of students and considering their future learning needs, plan for a Junior Secondary English Language curriculum to gear students towards the

Enhancing English Vocabulary Learning and Teaching at Secondary Level is a resource package produced by the English Language Education Section, Curriculum

3 The teaching modes of ELA in English include collaboration between non-language subject teachers and English Language teachers to conduct cross-curricular English

- To provide career and life planning education at the junior secondary level to develop students’ understanding of themselves in the context of whole-person development.