王光復（2002）：科技能力評量表( Rubrics )之需求及設計。生活科技教育，35 (2): 2-8。
吳兆棠（1966）：吳兆棠博士文集，下冊（pp.1）。台北市：台灣書店。
吳明隆（1998）：教室作為評量環境的內涵 與其評量新趨勢。研習資訊，15 (4)。
吳毓瑩（1996）：評量的蛻變與突破－－從哲學思潮與效度理論思考起。教育資料與研究，
13，2-15。
吳毓瑩（1999）：效度。載於王文中、呂金、吳毓瑩、張郁雯、張淑慧合著，教育測驗與 評量：教室學習觀點，第三章。台北：五南。
卓播禮（1984）：探討式和探究式的科學教學。教育部科學思考模式單元教學實驗計畫研 習特刊，3，32。
姜蓓蒂（1990）：中美初級中學自然科學教科書之分析與比較。台北：台灣師範大學科學 教育中心。
段曉林、李成康、黃啟淵（1992）：探究國中生參與化學專題研習活動中的表現─個案研 究。論文發表於中華民國第八屆科學教育學術研討會。高雄市：國立高雄師範大學。
洪振芳（1999）：從理論與實踐的對話建構科學史融入科學教學的範例。「1999 科學史、
哲與科學教育學術研討暨研習會」論文彙編，29-38。高雄：國立高雄師範大學物理系。
洪振芳、賴羿蓉（1997）：教師對以邏輯實證與後邏輯實證主義科學哲學觀建構之電化電 池發展史教材的認識與抉擇。科學教育學刊，5，347-390。
范信賢（2000）：無聲之聲：從教師的觀望與冷漠再思九年一貫課程改革的進路。國立屏 東師院「當學校－教師遇上九年一貫課程改革」對談會。
桂怡芬、吳毓瑩（1998）：自然科實作評量的效度探討。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，45 (2)，
19-36。
翁秀玉（1977）：國小自然科教師傳達科學本質之行動研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育 研究所論文。
翁秀玉、段曉林（1997）：科學本質在科學教育上的啟示與作法。科學教育月刊，201，2-15。
高慧蓮、蘇明洲（2000）：科學的本質與科學哲學觀的演進。屏師科學教育，12，3-13。
張巨青、吳寅華（1994）：邏輯與歷史－現代科學方法論的嬗變。台北：淑馨出版社。
張惠博（1993）：邁向科學探究的實驗教學。教師天地，62，12-20。
教育部（1999）：國民教育九年一貫課程綱要（草案）。台北：教育部。
教育部（2000）：國民教育九年一貫課程綱要（草案）。台北：教育部。
許榮富（1985）：科學過程技能簡介。中等教育，36，26-31。
郭重吉（1992）：從科學哲學觀點的改變探討科學教育的過去與未來。彰化師大學報，3，
532-555。
陳佩君（2002）：實踐多元化評量於國小中年級自然科教學之行動研究。國立屏東師範學 院數理教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
陳玫良（2002）：評量規準( Rubrics )在生活科技教學評量上之運用。生活科技教育，35 (1)，
2-9。
陳嘉皇（2002）：從成績單學習表現敘述之問題探討計分標準在教學與評量上的實際運用。
國教天地，149，73-79。
游淑媚（2001）：職前國小教師培育課程中融入真實的科學探究學習與指導之研究。九十 學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會論文集，p. 1077-1108。
黃鴻博（1996）：改變中的自然科學評量實務。國教輔導，35 (5)，42-47。
楊文今（2000）：為什麼理解科學的本質重要？引自 http://web.cc.ntnu.edu.tw/~wgy/default.htm。
楊銀興（n.d.）：多元化評量的理論與作法。取得10 月21 日2002 從 http://www2.thu.edu.tw/~edupage/meeting%202/yang.htm.
楊遵榮（2001）：自然與生活科技學習領域教學理念與教材編輯。邁向課程新紀元(七)九年 一貫課程學習領域研討會論文集。歐用生/莊梅枝主編。取得10 月23 日2002從
http://www.trd.org.tw/Cpast/9-7.htm.
溫存儒（2002）：探究國一學生科學探究活動之參與內涵及其參與動機之個案研究。彰化 師範大學科學教育研究所在職進修專班碩士論文。
趙金祁（1999）：科學教育立論基礎芻議。1999 科學史、哲與科學教育學術研討暨研習會。
高雄：國立高雄師範大學物理系。
劉宏文（2001）：高中學生進行開放式科學探究活動之個案研究。網址：
http://203.71.212.1/resource/liu_proposal/homepage.htm
劉湘川（1998）：多元化評量系統簡介：提供完整且專業的教學評量資源，以助教學品質 之提升。北縣教育，25，38-45。
蕭碧茹、洪振芳（2000）：以認知歷史分析法探究科學史及其在科學教育的意涵。科學教 育月刊，235，2-13。
鍾聖校（1999）：自然與科技課程教材教法。台北：五南圖書出版公司。
簡聿成（2000）：融入科學史之電腦輔助學習教材對高中生科學探究思考學習之個案研究。
國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
簡茂發(1999)：多元化評量之理念與方法。師大校友，298，9-15。
Abbagnano, N. (1967). Positivism. In P. Edwards (Ed.), The encyclopedia of philosophy, vol. six.
New York: MacMillan.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (1998, April). Improving scienceteachers’conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-436.
Abimbola,I.O.(1983).Therelevanceofthe“new”philosophy ofscience for the science curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 83 (3), 181-193.
Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’conceptionsofnatureofscience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295-317.
Alters, B. (1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 39-55.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Project 2061: Benchmarks forscience literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Appenbrink, D., & Hounshell, P. B. (1981). Physical science. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Assessment of Performance Unit (1989). Science at age 11(and13, 15). London, H MSO.
Bentley, M. L., & Garrison, J. W. (1991). The role of philosophy of science in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2 (3), 67-71.
Bombaugh, R. (1995). Peace Corps Fellows enter the urban classroom: Learning to teach by the authority of experience. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan.
Boyd, R. (1991). Confirmation semantics, and the interpretation of scientific theories. In R. Boyd, P. Gasper, & J. D. Trout (Eds.), The philosophy of science. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Bronowski, J. (1965). Science and human values. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
Bronowski, J. (1966). The identity of man. New York: The Natural History Press.
Bronowski, J. (1978). The origins of knowledge and imagination. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
Brown, H. I. (1977). Perception, theory and commitment: The new philosophy of science.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
California State Board of Education. (1990). Science frame work: For California public schools, kindergarten through grade twelve. CA: California Department of Education.
Chiang, S. H. (1994). A study on the teaching behavior of beginner science teachers in secondary school by methods of time series analysis. Taipei, Taiwan: National Science Council.
Chiappetta, E. L., Sethna, G. H., & Fillman, D. A. (1993). Do middle school life science textbooks provide a balance of scientific literacy themes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 787-797.
Cleminson, A. (1990). Establishing an epistemological base for science teaching in the light of contemporary notions of the nature of science and of how children learn science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27 (5), 429-445.
Collette, A. T., & Chiappetta, E. L. (1994). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools (3rd ed.). New York: Maxwell Macmillan.
Cox-Petersen, A. (1999). Investigating the Nature of Science through a Museum Research
Apprenticeship Program. 「1999 科學史、哲與科學教育學術研討暨研習會」論文彙編，
62-64。高雄：國立高雄師範大學物理系。
Dana, T. M., & Davis, N. T. (1993). On considering constructivism for improving mathematics and science teaching and learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington: AAAS Press.
Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of the literature related to
concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young People’sImagesofScience. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Duschl, R. A. (1985). Science education and philosophy of science: Twenty-five years of mutually exclusive development. School Science and Mathematics, 85 (7), 541-555.
Duschl, R. A. (1988). Abandoning the scientistic legacy of science education. Science Education, 72 (1), 51-62.
Eastman, G. (1969). Scientism in science education. The Science Teacher, 36, 19-22. Eisner, E.
W. (1985). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (2nded.). New York: MacMillan.
Fabricius, W. V. (1983). Piaget theory of knowledge: Its philosophical context. Human Development, 26, 325-334.
Feyerabend, P. (1970). Consolation for the specialists. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. (1978). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London:
Verso.
Finley, F. N. (1983). Science processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 47-54.
Fleury, S. C., & Bentley, M. L. (1991). Educating elementary science teachers: Alternative conceptions of the nature of science. Teaching Education, 3 (2), 57-66.
Fredericksen, J. R. & Collins, A.(1989). A systems approach to educational testing Educational Researcher, 189, 27-32.
Gallagher, J. J. (1993). Secondary science teachers and constructivist practice. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington: AAAS Press.
Garrison, J. W. (1986). Some principles of postpositivistic philosophy of science. Educational Researcher, 15, 12-18.
Garrison, J. W., & Bentley, M. L. (1990). Teaching scientific method: The logic of confirmation and falsification. School Science and Mathematics, 90 (3), 188-197.
Good, R. G., Wandersee, J. H., & Julien, J. (1993). Cautionary notes on the appeal of the new
“ism”(constructivism)in scienceeducation.In K.Tobin (Ed.),The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington: AAAS Press.
Gorman, M. E. (1986). Falsification in experimental and classroom simulations. School Science and Mathematics, 86 (4), 306-321.
Hand, B., Prain, V., Lawrence, C., & Yore, L. D. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1021-1035.
Hanson, N. R. (1961/1958). Patterns of discovery (2nded.). Cambridge: The University Press.
Hanson, N. R. (1977). Is there a logic of scientific discovery? In B. A. Brody (Ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Harris, K. (1979). Education and knowledge: The structured misrepresentation of reality. London:
Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Hodson, D. (1985). Philosophy of science, science and science education. Studies in Science Education, 12, 25-57.
Hodson, D. (1986). Philosophy of science and science education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 20 (2), 215-225.
Hodson, D. (1988). Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum. Science Education, 72 (1), 19-44.
Hodson, D. (1993). Teaching and learning about science: considerations in the philosophy and sociology of science. In D. Edwards, E. Scanlon, & D. West (Eds.), Teaching, learning and assessment in science education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd, The Open
University.
Hume, D. (1962). Of ideas, their origin, composition, connection, abstraction, etc. In D. G. C.
Macnabb (Ed.), A treatise of human nature, Book One. London: Fontana/Collins.
Justi R., & Gilbert, J. (2000). History and philosophy of science through models: some challenges in thecaseof‘theatom’.International Journal of Science Education, 22, 993-1009.
Kant, I. (1965). Critique of pure reason (translated by Norman Kemp Smith). New York: ST Martin Press.
Kauffman, G. B. (1989). History in the chemistry curriculum. Interchange, 20, 81-94.
Kelly, G. J., Carlsen, W. S., & Cunningham, C. M. (1993). Science education in sociocultural context: Perspectives from the sociology of science. Science Education, 77 (2), 207-220.
Kisiel, T., & Johnson, G. (1974). New philosophies of science in the USA. A selective Survey.
Zeitschrift fur allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, 5, 138-191.
Krajcik, Blumenfeld, Marx, ＆ Soloway (2000). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In Mirstell, J. Uan Zee, E. (Eds.) Inquiry into inquiry: science learning and teaching. American Association for the Advancement of Science Press, Washington, DC. pp.283-315.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970/1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nded.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of science research programmes. In I.
Lakatos, & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lederman, N. G. (1983). Delineating classroom variablesrelated to students’conceptionsofthe nature of science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University.
Lederman,N.G.(1986).Students’and teachers’understanding ofthenatureofscience:A reassessment. School Science and Mathematics, 86 (2), 91-99.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Loving, C. C. (1997). From the summit of truth to its slippery slopes: Science education journey through positivist-postmodern territory. American Educational Research Journal, 34 (3), 421-452.
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
Matthews, M. R. (1998). How history and philosophy in the US Science Education Standards could have promoted multidisciplinary teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 285-293.
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (ed.), Educational Measurement (3rded.) (pp.13103 ).
New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
Messick, S.(1992). Validity of test interpretation and use. In M. C. Alkin(Ed.), Encyclepedia of educational research, (pp. 1487-1495). New York: Macmillan.
Miller, R., & Driver, R. (1987). Beyond processes. Studies in Science Education, 14, 33-42.
Milne,C.,& Taylor,P.C.(1995).Metaphorsasglobalmarkersforteachers’beliefsaboutthe nature of science. Research in Science Education, 25 (1), 39-49.
Moyer, R., & Bishop, J. (1986). General science. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Murcia,K.,& Schibeci,R.(1999).Primary studentteachers’conceptionsofthenatureofscience.
International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1123-1140.
National Research Council (1996). Naional Science Education Standards. Washington DC:
National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1994). National science education standards: A draft. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
Nersessian, N. J. (1989). Conceptual change in science and in science education. Synthese, 80, 163-183.
Nussbaum, J. (1989). Classroom conceptual change: philosophical perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 530-540.
Palmeri, A. B. (1995). The consistency between second-gradeteachers’beliefstoward science and their science teaching practice. Doctoral Dissertation: Indiana University.
Petersen-Falshoft, G. (1979). Philosophy of science and didactics (Henn, Kastellaun). In German.
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Toward a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Popham, W. J. (1997). What's wrong--and what's right--with rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55 (2), 72-75.
Popper, K. R. (1968). Conjectures and refutations in the growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Puckett, M. B., & Black, J.K.(1994). Authentic assessment of the young child celebrating development and learning. New York：Macmillan College Publishing Company.
Roth, W. M. (1993). Construction sites: Science labs and classrooms. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington: AAAS Press.
Roth, W. M. (1995). Authentic school science: knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sax, G. (1989). Principles of Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation (3rded.). Belmont, CA: Wad- sworth.
Shapere, D. (1987). Method in the philosophy of science and epistemology: How to inquire about inquiry and knowledge. In N. J. Nersessian (Ed.), The process of science: Contemporary philosophical approaches to understanding scientific practice. Netherlands: Dordrecht.
Shaw, K. L., & Etchberger, M. L. (1993). Transitioning into constructivism: A vignette of a fifth grade teacher. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education.
Washington: AAAS Press.
Smith, M. U., Lederman, N. G., Bell, R. L., McComas, W. F., & Clough, M. P. (1997). How great is the disagreement about the nature of science: A response to Alters. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (10), 1101-1103.
Stake, R. E., & Easley, J. A. (1978). Case studies in science education. Urbana, IL: Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation, University of Illinois.
Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. (1994). Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education.
Science Education, 78 (4), 387-398.
Stenhouse, D. (1985). Active philosophy in education and science. Boston, MA: G. Allen &
Unwin Ltd.
Stone, L. (1992). Postpositivist teaching; beyond the myth of prediction. Paper presented at the
1992 JUSTEC conference. Tamagawa University, Tokyo.
Terhart, E. (1988). Philosophy of science and school science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 10 (1), 11-16.
Tombari, M., & Borich, G.(1999). Authentic assessment in the classroom ：Applicationa and practice. New Jersey：Prentice Hall.
Toulmin, S. E. (1953). The philosophy of science: An introduction. London: Hutchinson &
Company, Ltd.
Toulmin, S. E. (1985). Pluralism and responsibility in post-modern science. Science, Technology and human values, 10 (1), 28-37.
Treagust,D.F.,Duit,R.,& Fraser,B.J.(1996).Overview:Research on students’
preinstructional conceptions -- the driving force for improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics. New York, London: Teachers College Press, Teachers College Columbia University.
Wang, H. C. A. (1999). A content analysis of the history of science in the national science
standards documents and four secondary science textbooks. 「1999 科學史、哲與科學教 育學術研討暨研習會」論文彙編，57-61。高雄：國立高雄師範大學物理系。
Wang, J. R. (1995). A casestudy:An investigation ofteachers’conceptionsofthenatureof science, science teaching and learning, classroom practices, and other contextual matters.
Doctoral Dissertation: University of Northern Colorado.
Yager, R. E. (1990). Workshop Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education.
Science Education Center, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, R. O. C.
Yager, R. E. (1994). Science-Technology-Society as Reform. Science Education Center, The University of Iowa City, JA. U. S. A.