林志宜 (2009 )。建構小五學生 Google 地球地圖學習情境:以活動理論為架構之研究。
淡江大學教育科技學系碩士在職專班碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
[ Lin,
c.-
Y. (2009). Research oncons的ctinga Google Earth Map learning environment for 5th grade students: Applyingactiv妙的eoryas aframework. Unpublished master's thesis,TamkangUr盯ersity， Tai闕，Taiwan.>
林怡君 (2010 )。從活動理論觀點研究薑灣中學跨國協作交流計畫。國立臺灣科技大學 應用外語系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
[Lin,
Y.-c.
(20 I0). Investigating the implem凹的tion of an international e-learning platform。ta high school in Taiwan. Unpublished master's thesis,National Taiwan University of Science and Technology,Taip缸，Taiwan.>
林郁婷 (2010 )。以活動理論檢視三位中學英語教師對於資訊融入教學的理念與實踐。
國立交通大學英語教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
<Lin,
Y.-
T. (2010). Anact川沙 theoryperspective to examine three secondary school English teachers'beliφ andpractices in technology integration. Unpublished master's thesis, National Chiao Tung University,Hsinchu,Taiwan.>唐昇志 (2002 )。以活動理論為架構分析網路主題式學習活動。國立花蓮師範學院教育 研究所碩士論文，未出版，花蓮市。
<Tang,S.-
c.
(2002). Using activity"heory as framework to analyze activities ofweb-based thematic learning. Unpublished master's thesis,National Dong Hwa University Meilun Campus,Hualien,Taiwan.>張淑玲 (2005 )。合作成長小組但進國小教師數學教學知能與反思能力成長之探討。國 立臺灣師範大學數學系博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
【 Char池， S.-L. (2005). Investigations into the growth of elementary school teacher 50 mathematics teaching competence andr，電flectionunder the operation of co-development group. Unpublished doctoral of dissertation,National Taiwan Normal University,Taipei, Taiwan.>
黃志賢、林福來 (2008 )。利用活動理論分析臺灣泰雅族國中生的數學學習並設計教學 活動。科學教育學刊， 16 (2) . 147-169 。
【 Hua嗯， C.-H.,& Lin F.-L. (2008). The analysis of the learning of Taiwanese Tayal junior high school students and the design of teaching activities utilizing activity theory. Chinese Journal ofScience Education,I6(2),I咐-169.]
陳向明 (2002 )。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南。
[Ch凹， C.司M. (2002). Qualitative research in SocialScience. Taipei,Taiwan: Wunan. ]
陳宏維 (2010 )。以活動理論探討兩位臺灣大學英文寫作老師教學信念及實施。國立交 通大學英語教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
<Chen,H.-W.(2010). A casestu砂 on 仰oTaiwanese EFL college writing teachers'beliφ and
teaching practices: An activitytheoη)perspective. Unpublished master's thesis,National
Chiao Tung University,Hsinchu,Taiwan.>
陳佩英、焦傳金 (2009 )分散式頡導與專業學習社群之建構:一所高中教學創新計畫的 個案研究。教育科學研究集刊， 54 (l) .55-86 。
[Chen,P.-玄， & Chiao,C.-C. (2009). Distributed leadership and professional learning community: A case study of innovative teaching in a high school.Journal of Educational Research,54(1),55-86.]
鄭燕祥 (2004 )。教育報導與改革:新範式。臺北市:高等教育。
<Cheng,Y.-C. (2004). Educationalleadersh伊 andreform: New paradigm. Taipei,Taiwan:
Higher Education.>
鄭燕祥 (2006 )。教育範式轉變:效能保證。臺北市:高等教育。
[Che嗯， Y.-C. (2006). Paradigmsh拼 in education: Effectiveness assurance. Taipei, Taiwan:
Higher Education.>
潘淑滿 (2003 )。質性研究:理論與運用。臺北市:心理。
<Pan, S.-F (2003) 0 Qualitative research: Theory and application. Taipei,Taiwan:
Psychological >
劉宜汶口010) 。部落格為中介行為之教師發展。國立交通大學英語教學研究所碩士論文，
未出版，新竹市。
<Liu,Y.-w. (2010). Blogging as mediated actions in teacher development. Unpublished master's thesis,National Chiao Tung University,Hsinchu,Taiwan.>
Ahonen, H.,& Virkkunen, J. (2003). Shared challenge for learning. Dialogue between managementand 企ont-lineworkers in knowledge management.International Journal of Information Technology and Management,2(1-2),59-84.
Albrow,M. (1990). Globalization,knowledge and society. London: Sage.
Creswell, 1.W. (2005). Educational research: Planning,conducting,and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River,NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall
Enges肘m ，Y.(1987). Learning by expanding: Anactivi紗-theoretical 中'Proachto developmental
rωearch.Helsinki,Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engestrom,Y. (1998). Reorganizing the motivational sphere of classroom culture:An activity-theoretical analysis of planning in a teacher team. InF. Seeger,J. Voigt,& U. Waschescio (Eds.),The culture ofthe mathematics classroom(pp. 76-105).Cambrid阱，UK: Cambridge University Press.
Engestrom,Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge
creation in practice. InY.Engestrοm ，R. Miettinen,&Rι.Punamaki (Eds.),Perspectives on activity theory(pp. 377-404). Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.
Engestrom,Y.,Kerosuo, H., & Kajamaa,A. (2007). Beyond discontinuity: Expansive orgamizationallearning remembered. Management Learning,38(3),319-336.
Engestrom,Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work.Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.
Enges仕om，玄，& Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations,findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review,5,1-24.
Fenwick,T. J. (2004). Learning in portfolio work: Anchored innovation and mobile identity.
Studies in Continuing Education,26(2),229-245.
FitzSimons,G. E. (2003). Using Engestrom's expansive learning 台ameworkto analyze a case study in adult mathematics education.Literacy& Numeracy Studies,12(2),47-63.
Foot,K. (200 I). Cultural-historica~activity theory as practical theory: Illuminating the development of a conflict monitoring network. CommunicationTheo吵， 11(1)， 56-83.
Ford,D. (1991). The school principal and Chicago schoolr，φrm:Principal's earlyperc中tlOns
ofreform initiatives.Chicago: Chicago Panel on Public school Policy and Finance.
Fullan,M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Giddens,A. (1990). The consequences ofmodernity. Cambridge,UK: Polity Press.
Giddens,A. (2000). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. London:
Routledge.
Hargreaves,A. (1994). Changing teachers,changer times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. London: Cassell.
Harris,A.,& Bennett,N. (Eds.). (2004). School 電ffectiveness and school improvement.New York: Continuum.
Hill ，民， Capper,P.,Wilson, K., Whatman, R.,&Wong, K. (2007). Workplace learning in the New Zealand apple industry network: A new co-design method for government“practice making". Journal ofWorkplace Learning,19(6),359-376.
Jo恤son， S. M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. New York: Basic Books.
Kazlauskas, A.,& Crawford, K.(2007). Learning what is not yet there:Knowledge mobilization in a communal activity. Learning and socio-culturaltheoηλ.·E耳ploringmodern 巧Igotskian
perspectives international workshop, 1(1). Retrieved from h仕p://ro.uow.edu.au/llrg/voll / issl/8
Kruse,S. D.,Louis,K. S. & Bryk,A. S. (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. In K. S. Louis,S. Kruse,& Associates (Eds.), Professionalism and community: Perspectives on，φrmingurban schools(pp. 1-22). Long Oaks,CA: Corwin.
Langemeyer,I. (2006). Contradictions in expansive learning: Towards a critical analysis of self-dependent forms of leaming in relation to contemporary socio-technological change.
Forum QualitativeSoziαlforschung， 7(1). Retrieved August 10,2010,from http://www.
qualitative-research.net/fqs/
Leithwood, K., Jantzi,D., & Steinbach, R. (2000). Changingleadersh伊 forchanging times.
Bristol,PA: Open University Press
Llewellyn,D. (2002). Inquire within: Implementing inquiry-based science standards. Thousand Oaks,CA: Corwin Press.
Llewellyn,D. (2005). Teaching high school science through inquiry: A casestu咿咿'[Jroach.
Thousand Oaks,CA: Corwin Press.
Makino,Y.(2007). The third generation of e-Ieaming: Expansive learning mediated by a weblog.
International Journalof 悅bBased Communities,3(1),16-31.
Mu 中hy， J. (1994). Transformational change and the evolving role of the principal: Early empirical evidence. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.),Reshaping theprincipalshψ
Insights from tranφrmational r，彷附有(forts(pp. 3-19). Thousand Oaks,CA: Corwin Press.
Miettinen, R.(1999). Transcending traditional school leaming: Teachers' work and networks of learning. InY.Engestrom,R. Mittinen, & R. Punamliki (Eds.),Perspectives on activity theory(pp.325 司344). Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.
Neuman,W. L. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.
Boston,MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Pereira-Querol, M.,& Seppanen, L. (2009). Learning as changes in activity systems: The emergence of on-farm biogas production for carbon credits. Outlook on Agriculture,38(2), 147-155.
Sannino,A. (2005). Cultural-historical and discursive tools for analyzing critical conflicts in students' development.InK.Yamazumi,Y. Enges甘om ，&H. Daniels (Eds.),New learning
challenges: Going beyond the industrial age system ofschool and work(pp. 165-195).
Osaka,Japan: Kansai University Press.
Sannino,A.,Daniels,H.,& Gutierrez,K. D. (2009). Learning and expanding with activity theory.New York: Cambridge University Press
Sergiovanni,T. J. (2000). The lifeworld of leadership: Creating culture, commun旬" and personal meaning in our schools.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sfard,A. (1998). On two metaphors of learning and the dangers of choosing just one.
Educational Researcher,27(2),4-13.
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon,A.,Wallace,M.,& Thomas,S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature.Journal ofEducational Change,7(4),221-258.
Toiviainen,H. (2007). Inter-organizational learning across levels: An object-oriented approach.
Journal of WorkplaceLearni嗯，i9(6),343-358.
Vir尬unen，J.,&Ahonen,H. (2004). 可ansforming learning and knowledge creation on the shop floor.international Journal ofHuman Resources Development and Management,4(1), 57-72.
Vygots旬， L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
Yamagata-Lynch,L. C.,& Haudenschild,M. T. (2009). Using activity systems analysis to identify inner contradictions in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher
E耐cation ，25,507-517.
Yamagata-Lynch,L.仁，& Smaldino,S. (2007). Using activity theory to evaluate and improve K-12 school and university partnerships.Evaluation and Program Planning,30,364-380.
Yin,R.K.(1994).Casestu砂 research:Design and methods.Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.