立法院圖書館（2010）。〈立法院第7屆第6會期社會福利及衛生環境委員會第12次全體委員 會議紀錄〉，《立法院公報》，第99卷，第73期:151-274。
(Legislative Yuan Library [2010]. “the Meeting Minute of the 12nd Social Welfare and Environmental Hygiene Committee Meeting.” Legislative Yuan Bulletin, 99 (73): 151-274.) 行政院經濟建設委員會（2010）。〈環境永續與經濟發展雙贏〉。《台灣新經濟簡訊》，第115
期。8月16日。http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0014099。2012/02/18。
(Council for Economic Planning and Development [2010]. “Win-win Solution for Environmental Sustainability and Economic Development.” Taiwan New Economy Newsletter, 115. August 16. http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0014099 [accessed February 18, 2012].)
南亞塑膠工業股份有限公司（2003）。《六輕四期擴建計畫環境影響說明書》。12月2日。
http://eiareport.epa.gov.tw/EIAWEB/Main3.aspx?func=11&hcode=0920441A&address=&ra dius=。2012/2/18。
(Nan Ya Plastics Corporation [2003]. Environmental Impact Report of the 6th Naphtha Expansion Project. December 2. http://eiareport.epa.gov.tw/EIAWEB/Main3.aspx?func=11&hcode=09 20441A&address=&radius= [accessed February 18, 2012].)
台灣塑膠工業股份有限公司（2010）。《六輕四期擴建計畫環境影響調查報告書》。7月26 日。http://eiareport.epa.gov.tw/EIAWEB/Main3.aspx?func=10&hcode=0980827A&address
=&radius=。2012/2/18。
(Formosa Plastics Corporation [2010]. Environmental Impact Investigation Report of the 6th Naphtha Expansion Project. July 26. http://eiareport.epa.gov.tw/EIAWEB/Main3.aspx?func
=10&hcode=0980827A&address=&radius= [accessed February 18, 2012].)
行政院環境保護署（2008a）。《六輕相關計畫環境影響評估審查結論執行監督委員會第31次 會議紀錄》。3月17日。http://webarchive.ncl.edu.tw/archive/disk21/61/67/47/16/99/20071 1263039/20121222/web/epa.gov.tw/ch/DocListc8cd.html?unit=8&clsone=552&clstwo=559
&clsthree=897&busin=336&path=14033。2012/02/20。
(Environmental Protection Administration (2008a) “The 31st Meeting Record of the 6th Naphtha EIA Conclusion Implementation Investigation.” March 17. 1222/web/epa.gov.tw/ch/
DocListc8cd.html?unit=8&clsone=552&clstwo=559&clsthree=897&busin=336&path=1403 3 [accessed February 20, 2012].)
（2008b）。《六輕相關計畫環境影響評估審查結論執行監督委員會第32次會議紀 錄》。7月25日。http://webarchive.ncl.edu.tw/archive/disk21/61/67/47/16/99/20071126303 9/20121222/web/epa.gov.tw/ch/DocListc8cd.html?unit=8&clsone=552&clstwo=559&clsthr ee=897&busin=336&path=14033。2012/02/20。
臺灣民主季刊
( (2008b) “The 32nd Meeting Record of the 6th Naphtha EIA Conclusion Implementation Investigation.” July 25. http://webarchive.ncl.edu.tw/archive/disk21/61/67/47/16/99/200711 263039/20121222/web/epa.gov.tw/ch/DocListc8cd.html?unit=8&clsone=552&clstwo=559
&clsthree=897&busin=336&path=14033 [accessed February 20, 2012].)
（2009a）。《六輕相關計畫之特定有害空氣污染物所致健康風險評估計畫書專案小 組審查會議紀錄》。6月8日。http://atftp.epa.gov.tw/EIS/098/E0/08604/ %E5%85%A D%E8%BC%95%E9%A2%A8%E9%9A%AA%E7%B4%80%E9%8C%8498.6.8.doc。
2012/02/18。
( (2009a) “The Meeting Record of the 6th Naphtha Air Pollutants and Health Impact Assessment Proposal Committee Meeting.” June 8. http://atftp.epa.gov.tw/EIS/098/E0/
08604/%E5%85%AD%E8%BC%95%E9%A2%A8%E9%9A%AA%E7%B4%80%E9%8C
%8498.6.8.doc [accessed February 18, 2012].)
（2009b）。《六輕相關計畫之特定有害空氣污染物所致健康風險評估專家會議紀 錄》。7月6日。
( (2009b) “The Meeting Record of the 6th Naphtha Air Pollutants and Health Impact Assessment Committee Expert Meeting.” July 6.)
（2009c）。《六輕相關計畫之特定有害空氣污染物所致健康風險評估專家會議之延續 會議紀錄》。11月17日。
( (2009c) “The Meeting Record of the 6th Naphtha Air Pollutants and Health Impact Assessment Committee Expert Extension Meeting.” November 17.)
（2009d）。〈解決六輕健康風險評估調查爭議的有效制度〉。6月9日。http://www.
lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-18399 。2012/03/09。
( (2009d) “News Release: The Effective way to Solve the Disputes of the 6th Naphtha Health Risk Assessment.” June 9. http://www.lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-18399 [accessed March 9, 2012].)
（2010a）。《97年度六輕相關計畫之特定有害空氣污染物所致健康風險評估
%2583%25E8%25AD%25B0%25E7%25B4%2580%25E9%258C%2584.doc&ei=- r2aU5GUItW68gXBsYAo&usg=AFQjCNE5m20a1o2eItJCo98fa0piRLyBbg&sig2=
2gLy6aUKc0fV-9EgJ3ozaQ。2012/03/09。
( (2010a) “The Meeting Record of the 2008 6th Naphtha Air Pollutants and Health Impact Assessment Report Committee Meeting.” January 26. https://www.google.com.tw/url?sa=t
&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CFYQFjAI&url=http%
3A%2F%2Fatftp.epa.gov.tw%2FEIS%2F099%2FE0%2F02060%2F97%25E5%25B9%25
B4%25E5%2585%25AD%25E8%25BC%2595%25E9%25A2%25A8%25E9%259A%25 AA%25E8%25A9%2595%25E4%25BC%25B0%25E6%259C%2583%25E8%25AD%25 B0%25E7%25B4%2580%25E9%258C%2584.doc&ei=-r2aU5GUItW68gXBsYAo&usg=
AFQjCNE5m20a1o2eItJCo98fa0piRLyBbg&sig2=2gLy6aUKc0fV-9EgJ3ozaQ [accessed March 9, 2012].)
（2010b）。〈環保單位持續強化對廢氣燃燒塔管理，以維護雲嘉南空品區空氣品 質〉。10月29日。http://ivy5.epa.gov.tw/enews/fact_Newsdetail.asp?inputtime=099102914 3226。2012/4/9。
( (2010b) “News Release: Environmental Agencies Continue to Strengthen the Management of the Flaring to Protect Air Quality of the Yun Chia Nan Region.” October 29. http://ivy5.
epa.gov.tw/enews/fact_Newsdetail.asp?inputtime=0991029143226 [accessed April 9, 2012].)
朱淑娟（2009）。〈台塑六輕比一個永揚垃圾場還不如〉。11月17日。http://shuchuan7.
blogspot.com/2009/11/blog-post_19.html。2012/10/17。
(Shu-chung Chu [2009] “The 6th Naphtha is worse than the Yun-Yang Landfill.” November 17.
http://shuchuan7.blogspot.com/2009/11/blog-post_19.html [accessed October 17, 2012].) 朱道凱（譯），Deborah Stone（原著）（2007）。《政策弔詭—政治決策的藝術》。臺北：群
學出版社。
(Stone, Deborah [2007]. Dao-kai Zhu [trans.]. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. Taipei: Socio Publishing Co., Ltd.)
杜文苓（2009）。〈高科技污染的風險論辯—環境倡議的挑戰〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，第6卷，
第4期，頁101-39。
(Wen-ling Tu [2009]. “The Risk Debates on High-Tech Pollution: A Challenge to Environmental Advocacy.” Taiwan Democracy Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 4:101-139.)
（2010）。〈環評決策中公民參與的省思—以中科三期開發爭議為例〉，《公共行政學 報》，第35卷，頁29-60。
( [2010]. “Environmental Impact Assessment: Environmental Disputes over the 3rd Stage of Central Taiwan Science Park Development.” Journal of Public Administration, Vol.
35:29-60.)
汪浩（譯），Beck, Ulrich（原著）（2004）。《風險社會—通往下一個現代的路上》。臺北：
巨流。
(Beck, Ulrich [2004]. Hao Wang [trans.]. Risikogesellschaft-Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne.
Taipei: Chuliu Publishing Co., Ltd.)
周任芸（譯），Wynne, Brian（原著）（2007）。〈風險社會、不確定性和科學民主化—STS的 未來〔演講稿〕〉，《科技、醫療與社會》，第5期，頁15-42。
(Wynne, Brian [2007]. Ren-yun Zhou [trans.]. “Risk Society, Uncertainty and Democratization of Science: The Future of STS.” Taiwanese Journal for Studies of Science, Technology and Medicine, No. 5:15-42.)
臺灣民主季刊
周桂田（2000）。〈生物科技產業與社會風險—遲滯型高科技風險社會〉，《臺灣社會研 究》，第39期，頁239-83。
(Kuei-tien Chou [2000]. “Bio-industry and Social Risk-Delayed High-tech Risk Society.” Taiwan:
A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies, No. 39:239-83.)
（2005）。〈爭議性科技之風險溝通—以基因改造工程為思考點〉，生物多樣性人才培 育先導型計畫推動辦公室（主編），《生物多樣性—社經法規篇》，頁169-77。臺北：
教育部顧問室。
( [2005]. “Risk Communication on the Controversial Technology: A Case of GMO.” In Biodiversity Human Resource Pilot Project Promotion Office (ed.) Biodiversity: A Chapter of Social, Economics and Law (pp. 169-77). Taipei: Consulting Office of the Ministry of Education.)
（2008）。〈全球在地化風險典範之衝突—生物特徵辨識作為全球鐵的牢籠〉，《政治 與社會哲學評論》，第24卷，頁101-89。
( [2008]. “Glocalizational Conflict in Risk Paradigm-Biometrics as a Global Iron Cage.” A Journal for Philosophical Study of Public Affairs, Vol. 24:101-89.)
徐世榮、許紹峰（2001）。〈以民眾觀點探討環境影響評估制度〉。《台灣土地研究》，第2 卷，頁101-30。
(Shih-jung Hsu and Shao-feng Hsu [2001]. “The Research of Environmental Impact Assessment from the Viewpoint of Citizen Participation.” Journal of Taiwan Land Research, No.
2:101-30.)
陳信行（2011）。〈司法正義與科學事實如何交會？從Daubert爭議看法律、科學與社會〉，
《科技，醫療與社會》，第12期，頁17-60。
(Brian Wynne [2007]. “How Does Legal Justice Meet Scientific Fact? A View on Law, Science and Society through the Daubert Controversy.” Taiwanese Journal for Studies of Science, Technology and Medicine, No. 12:17-60.)
湯京平（1999）。〈鄰避性環境衝突管理的制度與策略—以理性選擇與交易成本理論分析六 輕建廠與拜耳投資案〉，《政治科學論叢》，第10卷，頁355-82。
(Ching-ping Tang [1999]. “Institutions and Strategies for Managing NIMBY Environmental Disputes: The Cases of Sixth Naphtha Cracker Plant and Bayer Project.” Taiwan Journal of Political Science, Vol. 10:355-82.)
湯京平、邱崇原（2010）。〈專業與民主—台灣環境影響評估制度的運作與調適〉，《公共行 政學報》，第35卷，頁1-28。
(Ching-ping Tang and Chung-yuan Chiu [2010]. “Professionalism and Democracy: The Operation and Adaptation of Environmental Impact Assessment in Taiwan.” Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 35:1-28.)
雲林縣政府（2010）。〈縣府召開環境監測記者會，邀請莊秉潔教授報告監測方法〉。11月9 日。http://www.yunlin.gov.tw/newskm/index-1.asp?m1=6&m2=45&id=201111090001" \t
"_blank。2012/03/03。
(Yunlin County Government [2010]. “County Government’s Press Conference Invites Prof. Ben Jei Tsuang to Report the Air Monitoring Methods.” http://www.yunlin.gov.tw/newskm/index-1.
asp?m1=6&m2=45&id=201111090001" \t "_blank [accessed March 3, 2012].)
詹長權（2009）。《97年度空氣污染對沿海地區環境及居民健康影響之風險評估規劃第1年計 畫研究報告》。4月5日。雲林縣政府環境保護局97年度委託專案計畫成果報告。http://
epq.epa.gov.tw/project/projectcp.aspx?proj_id=AHPDCEZJSV。2012/4/4。
(Chang-chuan Chan [2009] The First Year Research Project of the 2008 Air Pollution Impact on the Costal Environment and People’s Health. April 5. http://epq.epa.gov.tw/project/projectcp.
aspx?proj_id=AHPDCEZJSV [accessed April 4, 2012].)
黃淑莉、高嘉和（2010）。〈學者公布環署統計數據 / 六輕排放一級致癌物砷、鎘，佔中 區總排放量4成以上〉。《自由時報》。11月10日。http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/
paper/538014。2012/02/18。
(Shu-li Huang and Chia-he Kao [2010]. “The Scholar Publish EPA’s Data: the 6th Naphtha Releases Group 1 Carcinogens including Arsenic and Cadmium, which contribute 40% of Total Air Pollutants in the Central Region.” Liberty Times, November 10. http://news.ltn.com.tw/
news/life/paper/538014 [accessed February 18, 2012].)
經濟部工業局（2009）。〈報載「六輕致癌評估，工業局暗槓」回復說明〉，6月9日，《中 央通訊社》。http://www.cna.com.tw/postwrite/Detail/30953.aspx#.U5oT2fmSxqU。
2012/02/06。
(Industrial Development Bureau, Ministry of Economic Affairs [2009]. “Response to News Report
‘IDV Covers up Cancer Assessment of the 6th naphtha.’ ” Central News Agency. June 9.
http://www.cna.com.tw/postwrite/Detail/30953.aspx#.U5oT2fmSxqU. [accessed February 6, 2012].)
監察院（2009）。《雲林縣麥寮國小海豐分校空污案調查報告》（派查字號098000556）。
(The Control Yuan [2009] “Investigation Report on Air Pollution Case of the Yuan Country MeiLiao Elementary School.” Document No. 098000556.)
鄭秋霜（1992）。〈環境保護，六輕環評將併新六輕重審，張隆盛：會儘量加速審查但不代 表會加速通過〉。《經濟日報》，第9版。11月26日。
(Chiu-shun Cheng [1992] “Environmental Protection: the 6th Naphtha EIA will Incorporate the New Project to be Reviewed.” Economic Daily. November 26.)
蘇偉業（譯），Kevin B. Smith and Christopher W. Larimer（原著）（2010）。《公共政策入 門》。臺北：五南出版社。
(Kevin B. Smith and Christopher W. Larimer [2010]. Bennis Wai-yip So [trans.]. The Public Policy Theory Primer. Taipei: Wu-nan Culture Enterprise Ltd.)
Ascher, William, Toddi Steelman and Robert Healy (2010). Knowledge and Environmental Policy:
Re-Imagining the Boundaries of Science and Politics. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
臺灣民主季刊
Bucchi, Massimiano and Federico Neresini (2008). “Science and Public Participation.” In Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael E. Lynch and Judy Wajcman (eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp. 449-72). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Clarke, Lee, Caron Chess, Rachel Holmes and Karen M O'Neill (2006). “Speaking with One Voice:
Risk Communication Lessons from the US Anthrax Attacks.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Vol.14, No. 3:160-69.
Corburn, Jason (2005). Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice.
Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Davis, Devra (2002). When Smoke Ran Like Water: Tales of Environmental Deception and the Battle Against Pollution. New York, NY: Basic Books.
DeLeon, Peter (1997). “The Policy Sciences for Democracy.” In Peter DeLeon (ed.), Democracy and the Policy Sciences (pp. 67-95). New York, NY: State Univ of New York Pr.
Douglas, Mary and Aaron Wildavsky (1982). Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Environmental and Technological Dangers. Berkeley, [Calif.]: University of California Press.
Dunn, William N. (1993). “Policy Reforms as Arguments.” In Frank Fischer and John Forester (eds.), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (pp. 254-90). London: UCL.
Fischer, Frank (2003). “Policy Analysis as Discursive Practice: The Argumentative Turn. “ in Frank Fischer (ed.), Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices (pp.
181-203). NY: Oxford University Press.
(2004). “Citizens and Experts in Risk Assessment: Technical Knowledge in Practical Deliberation.” Theory and Practice, Vol. 13, No. 1:90-98.
(2009). Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry. NY: Oxford University Press, USA.
Jasanoff, Sheila (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, Mass:
Harvard University Press.
(2004). States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social order. London ; New York: Routledge.
Keller, A. Campbell (2009). Science in Environmental Policy: The Politics of Objective Advice.
Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Lambert, Barrie (2002). “Radiation: Early Warnings; Late Effects. European Environment Agency.” In European Environment Agency (ed.), Late Lessons from Early Warnings:
The Precautionary Principle 1896-2000 (pp. 31-37). London ; Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publications.
Levidow, Les (2007). “European Public Participation as Risk Governance: Enhancing Democratic Accountability for Agbiotech Policy?” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: an International Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1:19-51.
Limoges, Camille (1993). “Expert Knowledge and Decision-making in Controversy Contexts.”
Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 2, No. 4: 417-26.
Moore, Kelly (2006). “Powered by the People: Scientific Authority in Participatory Science.” In Scott Frickel and Kelly Moore (eds.), The New Political Sociology of Science (pp. 299-326).
Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Nowotny, Helga (2003). “Democratising Expertise and Socially Robust Knowledge.” Science and Public Policy, Vol. 30, No. 3:151-56.
O’rourke, Dara and Gregg P. Macey (2003). “Community Environmental Policing: Assessing New Strategies of Public Participation in Environmental Regulation.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 22, No. 3:383-414.
Ottinger, Gwen and Benjamin Cohen (2012). “Environmentally Just Transformations of Expert Cultures: Toward the Theory and Practice of a Renewed Science and Engineering.”
Environmental Justice, Vol. 5, No. 3:158-63.
Sarewitz, Daniel (2004). “How science Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse.”
Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 7, No. 5:385-403.
Scott, Dianne and Clive Barnettb (2009). “Something in the Air: Civic Science and Contentious Environmental Politics in Post-apartheid South Africa.” Geoforum, Vol. 40, No. 3:373-82.
Sirianni, Carmen (2009). Investing in Democracy: Engaging Citizens in Collaborative Governance.
Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Wagenaar, Hendrik andS. D. Noam Cook (2003). “Understanding Policy Practices: Action, Dialectic and Deliberation in Policy Analysis.” In Maarten A. Hajer and Hendrik Wagenaar (eds.), Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network society (pp.
139-71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weingart, Peter (1999). “Scientific Expertise and Political Accountability: Paradoxes of Science in Politics.” Science and Public Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3:151-61.
Wynne, Brian (1996). “May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-lay Rnowledge Divide.” In Scott M Lash, Bronislaw Szerszynski and Brian Wynne (eds.), Risk, environment Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology (pp. 44-83). London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Yearley, Steven (2006). “Bridging the Science- policy Divide in Urban Air-quality Management:
Evaluating Ways to Make Models More Robust Through Public Engagement.” Environment and Planning C: Government & Policy, Vol. 24:701-14.
Yearley, Steve, Steve Cinderby, John Forrester, Peter Bailey and Paul Rosen (2003). “Participatory Modeling and the Local Governance of the Politics of UK Air Pollution: A Three-city Case Study.” Environmental Values, Vol. 12, No. 2:247-62.
臺灣民主季刊
Wen-ling Tu is associate professor at the Department of Public Administration of National Chengchi University. Her research interests include environmental policy, sustainable development, STS, citizen participation, risk communication and deliberative democracy.
Chia-liang Shih is a Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Public Administration National Cheng-Chi University. His research interests include environmental policy, STS, citizen participation.