• 沒有找到結果。

第五章 結論與建議

第二節 政策建議

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

58

第二節 政策建議

首先,本研究結果將提供相關研究者、投資者及政府有關企業避稅之參考依 據,使其能夠利用財務報表中的資訊以衡量公司是否從事長期或短期之避稅行為,

幫助研究者進行相關研究;幫助投資者作出決策;幫助政府制定相關政策與法令。

同時,也提供國稅局從事避稅行為公司之可能特徵以及有關之避稅方法,幫助其 進行稽徵工作。

其次,本研究發現半導體業、建材營造業等積極從事避稅行為的可能性較高,

所承擔之稅負較輕;觀光事業、油電燃氣業等積極從事避稅行為的可能性較低,

所承擔之稅負較重。這與近年來政府鼓勵企業進行大量投資,並積極扶持半導體 等高科技產業有極大之關係。台灣的確成為全球首屈一指之半導體重鎮,確實達 到政府之政策效果。然而,政府在追求國家經濟成長之同時,也須審慎衡量國內 其他產業之發展,在制定針對特定產業稅式支出之同時,應作更良善之評估,避 免壓迫到其他產業之生存。

第三節 研究限制及未來展望

在研究限制上,要準確衡量企業從事避稅行為的程度有其困難性,因為相關

的實際資料取得不易。雖本文已參考多篇先前文獻之方法來推估避稅程度之高低,

但可發現,兩個避稅指標所得出之結果存在些微差異,可能仍然難以避免估計誤 差之存在。

‧ 國

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

59

本研究分析長短期避稅行為之決定因素,並呈現相關之產業效果,提供後人

針對避稅行為分析之參考依據。未來一旦能獲得國稅局之實際避稅資料,將可參 考Lisowsky (2010)一文,利用實際避稅資料與本研究所提供之避稅特徵,建立一 個能夠由台灣上市櫃公司之財報資料推論廠商從事租稅規避行為機率之模型。

‧ 國

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

60

參考文獻

一、中文文獻

王建煊與吳嘉勳(2011),租稅法,台北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。

陳明進、蔡麗雯(2006),「財稅所得差異決定因素及課稅所得推估之研究」,《管 理學報》,第 23 卷,第 6 期,739-763

陳明進(2000),「我國公司平均有效稅率決定因素之實證研究:財務報表資料及 課稅申報資料之分析比較」,《會計評論》,第 34 期,57-75

黃昭勇(2013),「企業好大稅好低」,《天下雜誌》,第 523 期,200-204

葛克昌(1977),「租稅規避之研究」,《國立臺灣大學法學論叢》,第 6 卷第 2 期 (3 月),167-187。

二、英文文獻

Badertscher, B., S. P. Katz, and S. O. Rego (2010), “The impact of private equity ownership on portfolio firms’ corporate tax planning.” Working paper, Harvard Business School.

Chen, S., X. Chen, Q. Cheng, and T. Shevlin (2010), “Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?” Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1): 41-61.

Cheng, C. S. A., H. H. Huang, Y. Li, and J. Stanfield (2012), “The effect of hedge fund activism on corporate tax avoidance.” The Accounting Review (Forthcoming).

‧ 國

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

61

Desai, Mihir A., and Dhammika Dharmapala (2006), "Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives," Journal of Financial Economics In Press, Corrected Proof.

Desai, Mihir A., and James R. Hines Jr (2002). "Expectations and expatriations:

Tracing the causes and consequences of corporate inversions." National Tax

Journal 55(3):409.

Dharmapala, Dhammika and James R. Hines (2009), “Which Countries Become Tax Havens?” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 93, pp. 1058-1068

Engel, Ellen, Merle Erickson and Edward Maydew (1999). "Debt-equity hybrid securities."Journal of Accounting Research 37(2):249.

Erickson, Merle, Austan Goolsbee and Edward Maydew (2003). "How prevalent is tax arbitrage? Evidence from the market for municipal bonds." National Tax Journal 56(1):259.

Graham, John, and Alan L. Tucker (2006). "Tax Shelters and Corporate Debt Policy."

Journal of Financial Economics 81(3): 563-594.

Spooner, G.M. (1986). “Effective tax rates from financial statements.” National Tax Journal, 36(1):293–306

Gupta, S., and K. Newberry, (1997), “Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal data,” Journal of Accounting and

‧ 國

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

62

Public Policy, 16(1):1-34

Hanlon, Michelle, Lillian Mills and Joel Slemrod (2005). “An Empirical Examination of Corporate Tax Noncompliance.” working paper presented at the conference on Taxing Corporate Income in the 21st Century.

Hanlon, M., and S. Heitzman(2012).” A review of tax research.” Journal of Accounting

and Economics, 50(December): 127–178.

Gravelle, Jane G. (2013) “Tax Havens: International Tax Avoidance and Evasion.” CRS Report for Congress.

Joos, P. and G. Plesko (2005) “Valuing loss firms.” The Accounting Review 80 (3):

847-870.

Klein, A. and C. Marquardt (2006) “Fundamentals of accounting losses” The

Accounting Review 81 (1): 179-206.

Manzon, Gil B., and George A. Plesko (2002). "The Relation Between Financial and Tax Reporting Measures of Income." Tax Law Review 55(2):175.

Mills, Lillian, Merle M. Erickson and Edward L. Maydew (1998). "Investments in Tax Planning." Journal of the American Taxation Association , 20(1):1.

Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation (OECD), Towards Global Tax Competition, 2000

Lisowsky, Petro (2010), “Seeking Shelter: Empirically Modeling Tax Shelters Using

‧ 國

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

63

Financial Statement Information”, Accounting Review, Vol. 85, No. 5

Rego, Sonja O. (2003). "Tax-Avoidance Activities of U.S. Multinational Corporations."

Contemporary Accounting Research 20(4):805-833.

Seida, Jim A., and William F. Wempe (2004). "Effective Tax Rate Changes and Earnings Stripping Following Corporate Inversion." National Tax

Journal ,57(4):805-828.

Slemrod, J., Yitzhaki, S(2002) Tax avoidance, evasion, and administration. In:

Auerbach, A., Feldstein, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Public Economics, vol. 3.

Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

Dyreng, Scott, Michelle Hanlon, and Edward L. Maydew (2008), “Long-Run Corporate Tax Avoidance.” Accounting Review, 83, 61-82

Dyreng, Scott, Michelle Hanlon, and Edward L. Maydew (2005), “Long-Run Corporate Tax Avoidance.” Working Paper, University of North Carolina.

Wilson, R. (2009) “An examination of corporate tax shelter participants.” The

Accounting Review 84 (3): 969-999.

三、網路資源

行政院主計總處,中華民國統計資訊網,http://www.stat.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=4

相關文件