對後續研究者的建議 - 微笑曲線的驗證－台灣半導體產業之實證分析

基於上述之研究限制，本研究仍有待改進之處，期望後續研究者能夠針對本研究所提之數點建議加以探討，以使產業價值鏈之價值移動概念能更完整呈現。綜而言之，本研究對後續研究之建議如下所述。

1. 隨著企業多角化的經營，於公開報表上難以區分個別業務產值，對於產業價值 鏈的分類、報酬率及附加價值的計算都存有困難，若後續研究者能與廠商針對此部分進行深入的訪談，將會使本研究更加完善。

2. 受限於分類不易，本研究未將半導體通路商納入產業價值鏈的分類中。後續研 究者可將台灣半導體產業價值鏈延伸至通路商，透過國內電子通路商的主要業務作區分，歸納出半導體通路商業者，完整半導體產業價值鏈的分類。

3. 本研究的研究對象僅限於國內公開上市（櫃）的企業，盼後續研究者若能將未 公開上市的企業納入產業價值鏈的分類，也許可讓產業價值鏈的價值流動更為完整呈現。

4. 面對國際競爭的壓力下，台灣半導體產業的市場已經不僅限於國內市場，因此 可納入國際間的半導體業者，發展為國際半導體產業價值鏈，而國際間的半導體業者大多屬於垂直整合的IDM 商業模式，可再進一步比較垂直整合與垂直分工的優劣。

參考文獻

1. Johan Roos, et al 著，智能資本：領航於新的商業版圖(Intellectual captial/navigating in the new business landscape)，施純協譯，知行文化，臺北，2000。

2. Kaplan & Norton，「衡量無形資產的價值」，哈佛商業評論中文版，第三十期，54~67 頁，2004。

3. Leif Edvinsson, Michael S. Malone 著，智慧資本：如何衡量資訊時代無形資產的價值，林大容譯，麥田出版社，臺北，1999。

4. Thomas A. Stewart 著，智慧資本：資訊時代的企業利基，宋偉航譯，智庫文化，臺北，1988。

5. 王興毅計畫主持，我國半導體產業發展策略研究報告，經濟部工業局經濟部資訊工業發展推動小組，臺北市，2001。

6. 何玉玲，「無形資產價值影響因素之研究-以台灣 IC 設計業為例」，國立交通大學，

碩士論文，2004。

7. 施振榮，未來六大趨勢，大塊文化出版股份有限公司，台北市，1990。

8. 施振榮，全球品牌大戰略-品牌先生施振榮觀點，天下雜誌，台北市，2005。

9. 施振榮，再造宏碁，天下文化，台北市，1996。

10. 施振榮，宏碁的世紀變革：淡出製造、成就品牌，天下遠見，台北市，2004。

11. 高強、黃旭男、末吉俊幸，管理績效評估：資料包絡分析法，華泰，台北市，2003。

12. 許楨屏，「無形資產價值衡量之研究-企業評價之觀點」，國立交通大學，碩士論文，

2003。

13. 覃禹華等著，2005 半導體工業年鑑，初版，新竹縣，工業技術研究院產業經濟與資訊服務中心，2005。

14. 楊川毅，「影響無形資產價值趨動因素之國內外比較-以台灣、美國 IC 設計業為例」，國立交通大學，碩士論文，2005。

15. 劉明賢，「IC 設計產業智慧資本與獲利能力關連性研究：台灣與美國實證」，國立交通大學，碩士論文，2005。

16. 劉常勇，「後進地區發展高科技產業之策略分析－以台灣 IC 產業發展經驗為例」，

劉常勇管理學習資料庫全球資訊網，1998。

17. 謝孟玹等編著，2006 半導體工業年鑑，初版，新竹縣，工業技術研究院產業經濟與資訊服務中心，2006。

18. Amato, L. and Wilder, R., “Firm and Industry Effects in Industrial Economics”, Southern Economic Journal, Vol.57, Iss.1, pp.93-105, 1990

19. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W.W., “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, Vol.30, Iss.9, pp.1078-1092, 1984.

20. Berman, J. and Pfleeger, J., “Which Industries Are Sensitive to Business Cycle”,

Monthly Labor Review, Vol.120, Iss.2, pp.19-25, 1997.

21. Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W., “Programming with Linear Functionals”, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol.9, pp.181-186, 1962.

22. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E., “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.2, Iss.6, pp.429-444, 1978.

23. Chauvin, K.W. and Hirshey, M., “Advertising, R and D Expenditures and the Market Value of the Firm”, Financial Management, Vol.22, Iss.4, pp.128-140, 1993.

24. Chin, Chen-Lung, Lee, Picheng, Chi, Hsin-Yi, Anandarajan, Asokan, “Patent Citation, R&D Spillover, and Tobin's Q: Evidence from Taiwan Semiconductor Industry”, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol.26, Iss.1, pp.67-84, 2006.

25. Christensen, Clayton M. and Overdorf, Michael, “Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.78, Iss.2, pp.66-76, 2000.

26. Chu, Po-Young, Teng, M.J., Huang, C.H., and Lin, H.S., “Virtual Integration and Profitability: Some Evidence from Taiwan’s IC Industry”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.29, Iss.1, 2, pp.152-172, 2005.

27. Chung, K., Pruitt, H., and Stephen, W., “A Simple Approximation of Tobin’s Q”

Financial Management, Vol.23, Iss.3, pp.70-74, 1994.

28. Edvinsson, L. and Malone, M. S., Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company's True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower, 1sted, Harper Business, New York, 1997.

29. Edvinsson, Leif and Sullivan, Patrick, “Developing a Model for Managing Intellectual Capital”, European Management Journal, Vol.14, No.4, pp.356-364, 1996.

30. Farell, M.J. , “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency“, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Vol.120, Iss.3, pp.253-581, 1957.

31. Firer, S. and Williams, S. M., “Intellectual Capital and Traditional Measures of Corporate Performance”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol.4, No.3, pp.348-360, 2003.

32. Gadiesh, O. and Gilbert, J.L., “Profit Pools: A Fresh Look at Strategy”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.76, Iss.3, pp.139-147, 1998.

33. Galbraith, John Kenneth, The new industrial state, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1967.

34. Hill, C.R.; Griffiths, W. E. and Judge, G.G., Undergraduate Econometrics,: John Wiley

& Sons, New York, 1997.

35. Itami, H. and Roehl, T. Roehl, Mobilizing Invisible Assets, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1987.

36. Kieso, Donald E., Weygandt, Jerry J., Warfield, Terry D., Intermediate accounting, 11thed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2004.

37. Kramer, J. K. and Peters, J. R., “An Interindustry Analysis of Economic Value Added as a Proxy for Market Value Added”, Journal of Applied Finance, Vol.11, Iss.1, pp.41-49, 2001.

38. Luthy, D. H., “Intellectual Capital and Its Measurement”, 1998, working paper.

(http://www3.bus.osaka-cu.ac.jp/apira98/archives/htmls/25.htm)

39. Lynn, B. E., “Performance evaluation in the new economy: Bringing the measurement and evaluation of intellectual capital into the management planning and control system”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.16, Iss.1-3, pp.162-177, 1998.

40. Perry, M. K., Vertical Integration: determinants and effects, In: Schmalensee, Willig, R.

(Eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, 5^th Edtion Elsevier, Amstredam, 1998.

41. Pulic, A. “VAIC^TM—an accounting tool for IC management”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.20, No.5, pp.703-714, 2000.

42. Pulic, A. and Bornemann, M., “The physical and intellectual capital of Austrian banks”, available at: www.measuring-ip.at/Papers/Pulic/bank/en-bank.html, 1999.

43. Pulic, A., “Measuring the performance of intellectual potential in knowledge economy”, available at: www.measuring-ip.at/Opapers/Pulic/vaictxt.vaictxt.html, 1998.

44. Ramcharran, H., “Inter-firm Linkages and Profitability in The Automobile Industry: The Implications for Supply Chain Management”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol.37, Iss.1, pp.11-17, 2001.

45. Schneider, U., “The Austrian approach to the measurement of intellectual potential”, available at:

www.measuring-ip.at/Opapres/Schneuder/Canada/theoreticalframework.html, 1999 46. Skandia., “Renewal and Development: Intellectual Capital”, Sweden: A supplement to

Skandia’s 1995 Interim Annual Report, 1995.

47. Slywotzky, A. and Linthicum, F., “Capturing Value in Five Moves of Less: The New Game of Business”, Strategy & Leadership, Vol.25, Iss.1, pp.5-11, 1997.

48. Steward, T. A., Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations, Dell Publishing Group Inc, New York, 1997.

49. Sveiby, K. E., “Methods for Measuring Intangible Assets”, 2002, working paper.

(http://www.Sveiby.com/articles/IntangibleMethods.htm)

50. Sveiby, K.E., The new organizational wealth: managing & measuring knowledge-based assets, 1sted, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, 1997.

51. Williams, M. S., “Is intellectual capital performance and disclosure practices related?”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol.2, Iss.3, pp.192-203, 2001.

52. Woo, C. Y. and Willard, G., “Performance representation in business policy research:

discussion and recommendation”, Paper presented at the 23rd Annual National Meetings of the Academy of Management, Dallas, 1983.

在文檔中微笑曲線的驗證－台灣半導體產業之實證分析 (頁 65-68)