第五章 結論及建議
第二節 建議
壹、研究對象方面
本研究對象侷限於中部地區之彰化縣、台中市與南投縣國小四、六年級學 生,因此對於研究結果的代表性可能稍嫌不足,建議後續研究可將研究對象擴 展至不同年級、不同地區的學生,以便更一步探討詞彙多樣性指標之成效。
71
貳、詞彙多樣性指標方面
本研究已完成詞彙多樣性指標的建置並進行初步的探討,礙於研究限制,
未能做全面性的推論,建議後續研究能針對本研究尚未建置之指標繼續發展並 再加以改進,讓國內的中文兒童文本分析系統更加完備。
參、研究工具方面
本研究在選擇編製文本時所使用之「中高年級閱讀理解測驗」,文本類型 僅包含記敘文及非記敘文,建議可納入其他文本文體,例如:詩歌、應用文、
說明文及議論文……等,使測驗內容更為完整;且閱讀理解測驗試題僅 32 篇,
因篇數稍嫌不足,測驗分數不足以作推論性解釋,因此建議,可增加測驗篇數、
題數,使研究結果為嚴謹。
肆、施測方式
建議後續研究者在施測上可以採用複本測驗,以減少受試學生因作答時間 過長產生疲累效應而影響測驗的準確性。
72
參考文獻
中文參考文獻
丁竹君(2011)。閱讀理解策略對國中國文科閱讀理解表現之成效探討。國立屏 東科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。屏東。
中央研究院數位典藏國家型科技計畫(2004)。中文斷詞系統。網址:
http://ckipsvr.iis.sinica.edu.tw/
中國文化研究院(2003)。現代漢語語法。網址:
http://www.chiculture.net/0615/html/b03/0615b03.html
林怡君、張麗麗、陸怡琮。(2013)。Rasch 模式建置國小高年級閱讀理解測驗。
教育心理學報,1,39 -61。 DOI:10.6251/BEP.20121128
柯華葳、詹益綾、張建妤、 游婷雅(2008)。臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養 PIRLS2006 報告。行政院國家科學委員專題研究成果報告 ( 編號:
NSC96-MOE-S-008-002)。桃園縣:國立中央大學學習與教學研究所。
胡裕樹(1994)。現代漢語詞類(重訂本)。上海:上海教育出版社。
教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要語文學習領域(國語文)。取自:
http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php
教育部(2010)。深耕閱讀教育 樹立磐石典範。教育部電子報。416。取自:
http://epaper.edu.tw/topical.aspx?topical_sn=463
郭伯臣、廖晨惠、楊裕貿、白鎧誌、陳文蘭、陳建宏、黃勇媜、蔡亞韋、蔡筱倩、
李湘瑩、葉靜如(2013)。中高年級文本理解測驗技術報告。臺中市:國立 臺中教育大學測驗統計與適性學習研究中心,未出版。
陳建宏(2013)。兒童文本詞類指標分析系統建置與應用。國立臺中教育大學教 育 測驗統計研究所碩士論文。臺中。
黃琬玲(2010)。以 NAEP 架構建置國小四、五年級閱讀理解測驗。國立屏東
73
教育大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。屏東。
黃珮選(2012)。「調整式問答關係策略」應用於國小社會領域閱讀理解教學之 研究。國立中正大學教育學研究所碩士論文。嘉義。
張豔、陳紀梁(2013)。言語產出中詞彙豐富性的定量測量方法。外語測試與教 學,3,34-40。
連啟舜(2002)。國內閱讀理解教學研究成效之統合分析。國立臺灣師範大學教 育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。臺北市。
陸芸(2012)。詞彙豐富性測量方法及電腦程式開發: 回顧與展望。南京工業大 學學報(社會科學版),2,104-108。
廖晨惠(2011)。以LSA為基礎之電腦化閱讀認知測驗及AutoTutor建置。國科 會專題 研究計畫編號:NSC 100-2420-H-142-001-MY3。臺北:中華民國行 政院國家科學委員會。
蔡筱倩(2013)。兒童文本詞頻詞彙指標分析系統建置與應用。國立臺中教育大 學教育 測驗統計研究所碩士論文。臺中。
蔡亞韋(2013)。 兒童文本潛在語意指標 分析系統建置與應用。國立臺中教育 大學教育 測驗統計研究所碩士論文。臺中。
錡寶香(2000)。國小低閱讀能力學童語言能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,20,
69-96。
蕭富元(2011)。芬蘭教育 世界第一的祕密。天下雜誌,384 取自:
http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5012870&page=1
鮑貴(2011)。不同課程水準英語學習者詞彙複雜性研究。解放軍外國語學院學 報,4,55-60。
http://study.naer.edu.tw/UploadFilePath//dissertation/l026_04_11vol026_04_11.pdf
74
英文參考文獻
Andrew. Mellor.(2011). Essay Length, Lexical Diversity and Automatic Essay Scoring. Memoirs of the Osaka Institute of Technology, Series B, 2, 1-14
Andrew. Mellor.(2012). Automatic Essay Classification. Memoirs of Osaka Institute of Technology, Series B , 2, 37-44
Crossley, S. A., Greenfield, J., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Assessing text readability using cognitively based indices. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 475-93. Retrieved from http://129.219.222.66:8080/SoletlabWeb/pdf/CrossleyGreenfieldMcNamara_2008 .pdf
Crossley, S. A., Allen, D.,& McNamara, D. S.(2011)Text readability and intuitive simplification:A comparison of readability formulas. Reading in a Foreign
Language, 23, 84-102.http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ926371.pdf
Daller, H., Van Hout, R., & Treffers-Daller, J.(2003). Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals. Applied Linguistics 24, 197-222.doi:
10.1093/applin/24.2.197
Engber, C. A.(1995). The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions Journal of Second Language Writing ,2,139-155.
Gough, P., & Tunmer, W.(1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disabilities.
Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10. DOI: 10.1177/074193258600700104 Graesser, A., McNamara, D., Louwerse, M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis
of text on cohesion and language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 193-202
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M.,(2011) . Coh-Metrix:
Providing Multileve Analyses of Text Characteristics. Feature Articles, 223-234.
75
Johansson, Victoria. (2008). Lexical diversity and lexical density in speech and writing: a developmental perspective. Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics and Phonetics Working Papers 53, 61-79
Johnson, D. D., & Pearson, P. D.(1978). Teaching readingvocabulary. New York:
Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Johnson, W.(1944). Studies in language behavior. I. A program of research.
Psychological Monographs, 56,1-15
Klare, G. R.(1963). The measurement of readability.Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press
Klare, G. R.(2000). The measurement of Readability:Useful information for communicators. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation, 24, 107-121.
Kintsch W.(1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182
Louwerse, M. M., McCarthy, P. M., McNamara, D. S., & Graesser, A. C. (2004).
Variation in language and cohesion across written and spoken registers. In K.
Forbus, D. Gentner, T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 843-848. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Laufer, B., & Nation, P.(1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16, 307-322.
Laufer, B.(2003). The influence of L2 on L1 collocational knowledge and on L1 lexical diversity in free written expression, in V. Cook (ed.), Effects of the L2 on the L1, Clevedon, Multilingual Matters, 19-31
Malvern, D.D., Richards, B.J., Chipere, N., & Dura´n, P.(2004). Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230511804
76
McCarthy, P.M.(2005). An assessment of the range and usefulness of lexical diversity measures and the potential of the measure of textual, lexical diversity
(MTLD). Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Memphis.
McCarthy, P.M., & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42. 381-392. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.2.381
McNamara, D. S., & Graesser, A.(2010). Coh-Metrix: An automated tool for theoretical and applied natural language processing. Applied natural language processing and content analysis: Identification,investigation, and resolution.
Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., McCarthy, P. M., & Graesser, A. C.(2010).
Coh-Metrix: Capturing linguistic features of cohesion. Discourse Processes, 47, 292-330.
McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P. M., & Cai,Z.(2013).Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix.
Philip M. McCarthy, Brian M Lehenbauer.,Charles Hall., Nick D. Duran., Yuko Fujiwara., and Danielle S. McNamara.(2007). A Coh-Metrix Analysis of Discourse Variation in the Texts of Japanese, American, and British Scientists Mccarthy & Jarvis.(2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of
sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods , 42, 381-392 doi:10.3758/BRM.42.2.381
Mellor, A.(2010). A utomatic essay scoring for low level learners of E nglish as a second language,Unpublished Phd thesis, Swansea University.
Miller, J. (1981). Assessing language production in children. Baltimore: University Park Press.
77
Myers, J. C., McCarthy, P. M., Duran, N. D., & McNamara, D. S.(2011). The bit in the middle: A computational analysis of the linguistic features of body paragraphs.
Behavior Research Methods.
OECD.(2010). PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn. Retrieved from OECD:
http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/48852630.pdf
Paul Booth.(2010). The Vocabulary Performance of Native and Non-Native Speakers and Its Relationship to Learning Style. Malaysian Journal Of ELT Research, 6, 46-83
Philip M. Mccarthy & Scott Jarvis. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 381-392 doi:10.3758/BRM.42.2.381
Read, J.(2002). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rie Koizumi.(2012)Relationships Between Text Length and Lexical Diversity Measures: Can We Use Short Texts of Less than 100 Tokens? Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 1, doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.7820/vli.v01.1.koizumi,60-69
Rupp, A., Garcia, P., & Jamieson, J.(2001). Combining multiple egression and CART to understand difficulty in second language reading and listening comprehension test items. International Journal of Testing, 1, 185-216.
Song Wen-juan & Zheng Hong-bo.(2011). Scientific Writing or Creative Writing: A Corpus Investigation. US-China Foreign Language, 5, 271-279
Templin, M. C. (1957). Certain language skills in children: Their development and interrelationships. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Yu, G.(2010) Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Applied Linguistics, 31, 236–259.
78
Ure, J.(1971). Lexical density: a computational technique and some findings. In M.
Coultard (Ed.), Talking about text (pp. 27-48). Birmingham: English Language Research, University of Birmingham.
Wang Hongwei& Yan Liqin.(2013). A Computational Analysis of Textual Features and L2 Writing Proficiency. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 4, doi: 10.6007/IJARPED/v2-i4/396 Xiaofei Lu.(2012) .The Relationship of Lexical Richness to the Quality of ESL
Learners’ Oral Narratives. The Modern Language Journal , 2, 190-208.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01232.x
Zareva, A., Schwanenflugel, P.,& Nikolova, Y.(2005). Relationship between lexical competence and language proficiency: Variable sensitivity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 567-595.