第五章 結論與建議
5.4 未來研究方向
5.4.2 用不同的任務來進行實驗
本研究所採用為 Arkes 等人(1989)的語句任務所設計本實驗，而現今社會的 網路發展快速，在網路上流傳的資訊亦是更加多元化。例如：鄭菲菲(2005)年提 出框架效應之去偏誤化─以網路採購為例，針對網路採購商業模式上所產生的框 架效應以及所使用的去偏誤化效果探討，因此建議未來研究可使用不同型態的任 務來進行實驗。
53
參考文獻
中文部分
1. 王榕榆(2005)。以答題信心度為基礎之線上評量系統碩士論文（未出版之碩 士論文）。國立暨南國際大學資訊管理學系，南投縣。
2. 吳金山、鄭菲菲、林信惠(2005)。框架效應對電子商務採購行為意圖影響之 研究（資訊管理學報）。3，12，131-157。
3. 陳敥虹(2007)。溝通協調管理（教育部提升技職校院學生通識教育暨語文應 用能力改善計畫書面教材）。朝陽科技大學社會工作系，台中市。
4. 楊伶琪(2006)。電子商務中促進個人化推薦之服務中介者探討（未出版碩士 論文）。國立臺灣大學資訊管理研究所，台北市。
5. 鄭菲菲(2005)。框架效應之去偏誤化─以網路採購為例（未出版博士論文）。 國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所，高雄市。
54
英文部分
1. Arnott, D. (1998). A Taxonomy of Decision Biases. Technical Report, Victoria, Australia: Monash University.
2. Arnott, D. (2006). “Cognitive biases and decision support system development: a design science approach.” Information Systems Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 55-78.
3. Arkes, H. R., Hackett, C. and Boehm, L. (1989). “The Generality of the Relation between Familiarity and Judged Validity.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 81-94.
4. Arkes, H. R. (1991). “Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing.” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 110, No. 3, pp. 486-498.
5. Bacon, F. T. (1979). “Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia.”
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, Vol. 5, No. 3,
pp. 241-252.6. Begg, I., Armour, V. and Kerr, T. (1985). “On believing what we remember.”
Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, Vol. 17, No.3 pp. 199-214.
7. Bawden, D., Holtham, C. and Courtney, N. (1999). “Perspectives on Information Overload.” Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 51, No. 8, pp. 249-255.
8. Bharati, P. and Chaudhury, A. (2004). “An empirical investigation of decision making satisfaction in web-based decision support systems.” Decision Support
Systems, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp.187-197.
9. Bazerman, M. H. and Moore, D. A. (2008). Judgment in Managerial Decision
Making, (7
th ed.), New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons.10. Block, B. A. and Harper, D. R. (1991). “Overconfidence in estimation: Testing the anchoring-and-adjustment hypothesis.” Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 188-207.
11. Banerjee, S. and Basu, A. (1993). “Model type selection in an integrated DSS environment.” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 75-89.
12. Caricato, P. and Grieco, A. (2009). “A DSS for production planning focused on customer service and technological aspects.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated
Manufacturing, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 871-878.
13. Cheng, F. F. and Wu, C. S. (2010). “Debiasing the framing effect: The effect of warning and involvement.” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp.
328-334.
14. Chiesi, H. L., Spilch, G. J. and Voss, J. F. (1979). “Acquisition of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge.” Journal of
Verbal Learnings and Verbal Behavior, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 275-290.
55
15. Cortiella, C. (2005) No Child Left Behind: Determining appropriate assessment accommodations for students with disabilities. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED486451)
16. DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (1992). “Information System Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable.” Information System Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 60-95.
17. Einhorn, H. J. and Hogarth, R. M. (1978). “Confidence in Judgment: Persistence of the Illusion of Validity.” American Psychological Association, Vol. 85, No. 5, pp. 395-416.
18. Fischhoff, B. (1982). “Debiasing.” in Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A.
(Eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, pp. 422-444.
19. Fischhoff, B., Riley, D., Kovacs, D. C. and Small, M. (1998). “What information belongs in a warning?.” Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 15, No. 7, pp.663-686.
20. Gigerenzer, G. (1984). “External validity of laboratory experiments: The
frequency-validity relationship.” American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 97, No. 2, pp. 185-195.
21. Flavian, C., Guinalý´u, M. and Gurrea, R. (2006). “The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty.” Information and
Management, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 1-14.
22. Gilliland, S. W. and Schmitt, N. (1993). “Information redundancy and decision behavior: A process tracing investigation.” Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 157-180.
23. George, J. F., Duffy, D. and Ahuja, M. (2000). “Countering the anchoring and adjustment bias with decision support system.” Decision Support System, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 195-206.
24. Hastie, R. and Dawes, R. M. (2001). Rational Choice in an Uncertain World: The
Psychology of Judgement and Decision Making. Sage Publications, Inc.
25. Hasher, L., Goldstein, D. and Toppion, T. (1977). “Frequency and the conference of referential validity.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 107-112.
26. Hasher, L., Attig, M. S. and Alba, J. W. (1981). “I knew it all along: or, did I?.”
Joumal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 86-96.
27. Hopkins, R. L. (1995). “Countering Information Overload: The Role of the Librarian.” Reference Librarian, Vol. 23 No. 49 and 50, pp. 305-333.
28. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1973). “On the psychology of prediction.”
Psychological Review, Vol. 80, No. 4, pp. 237-251.
29. Keren, G. (1990). “Cognitive aids and debiasing methods: Can cognitive pills cure
56
cognitive ills.” Advances in Psychology, Vol. 68, pp. 523-552
30. Kennedy, J. (1993). “Debiasing audit judgment with accountability: A framework and experimental results.” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp.
231-245.
31. Keen, P. G. and Morton, S. (1978). Decision support systems: An organizational
perspective. Boston, USA: Addison-Wesley.
32. Komiak, S. and Benbasat, I. (2006). “The Effects of Personalization and
Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents.” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 4.
33. Pereira, R. E. (2001). “Influence of Query-based Decision Aids on Consumer Decision Making in Electronic Commerce.” Information Resources Management
Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 31-48.
34. Schwartz, M. (1982). “Repetition and rated truth value of statements.” American
Journal of Psychology, Vol. 95, No. 3, pp. 393-407.
35. Scott-Morton, M. S. (1971). Management decision systems: Computer-based
support for decision making. Boston, USA: Harvard University Press.
36. Smith, H. W. (1911). Strategies of Social Research. (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
37. Salend, S.J. (2008). “Determining appropriate accommodations: Complying with NCLB and IDEA.” Teaching Exceptional Children, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 14-21.
38. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science, Vol. 185, No. 4157, pp. 1124-1131.
39. Thurlow, M.L., Lazarus, S.S., Thompson, S.J. and Morse, A. B. (2005). “State policies on assessment participation and accommodations for students with disabilities.” The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 38, pp. 232-240.
40. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive
psychology. San Francisco, USA: Freeman.
41. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
57
58
28 211-(33-17)*7=98？
29 有一長方體的體積是 3500 立方公分，它的底面積為 500 平方公分，那
59
60
61
62
107 蝶泳換氣抬頭時機為空中移臂時？
108 在踢毽單人對抗賽中，每人最多踢 3 次即應過網？
109 刀身上用以防衛部位是刀刃？
110 跆拳道練習時特別注重四大精神，分別為忍耐、積極、服從、尚義？
111 中華民國法律規定：立法委員及市議員的最低參選年齡是 22 歲？
112 臺灣的澎湖又被稱為「菊島」？
113 在廟裡許願擲筊，丟出「笑筊」時，筊的方向(凸面為反，平面為正)為 二正？
114 臺灣高鐵第一個啟用的車站是臺中站？
115 統一發票開獎日是雙月 25 日？
116 澎湖縣的電話區域號碼是 07？
117 使用滅火器時，應該將噴嘴朝向火源上方噴灑？
118 在超級市場突然覺得餓了，於是擅自把貨架上的食品吃掉這是竊盜行 為？
119 臺北市的市花是杜鵑花？
120 「馬祖」地名的由來，是當地先民為感念「媽祖」孝行而得名？
63
附錄二 系統畫面
第一階段實驗
1. 第一階段實驗系統登入畫面，受測者進入此畫面後，以 E-mail 當作 ID 輸入，並依照自己的專長程度選取數字 1(高)~6(低)。
2. 題目畫面共 7 個選項，受測者選擇自己最滿意之答案，點選完答案後便 可按下送出，進入下道題目，此畫面問項共 60 題。
64
3. 第一階段 60 題作答結束後，實驗結束的畫面。
第二階段實驗
1.
第二階段登入畫面，輸入與第一階段相同之 E-mail 當作 ID65
2. 題目畫面共 7 個選項，受測者選擇自己最滿意之答案，點選完答案後便 可按下送出，此畫面問項共 60 題。
3. 第二階段每題問題作答完成皆問在今天進行作答之前，你是否曾經看過 這題，共 3 個選項可以選擇。
66
4. 警告訊息畫面，在本實驗中分組部份，以第二組與第 4 組共有 20 題將 提出下列警告訊息
5. 重新選擇畫面，警告訊息結束後，在此題將讓受測者從新選擇一次。
67
6. 問卷畫面，60 題填答完成後，最後請受測者填寫一份重複資訊之問卷。