第五章 結論
第二節 研究限制與建議
口譯界對於跨領域學科的合作與研究已有數十年的歷史，然而本 研究以音樂表演與之對照比較的討論卻屬第一遭，可供參照的文獻實 屬有限，故本研究實為一初探性研究。礙於種種限制，本文就口譯與 音樂表演的比較與討論僅限於活動概況以及評量部分，建議未來研究 或可納入諸如教學方法、課程設計等面向，或許可挖掘出音樂表演研 究其他可供口譯學習之處。有興趣從事跨領域研究的口譯學者，也可 思索還有哪些活動與口譯具有某些程度同質性，以期繼續透過跨學科 的比較研究方式，增進對口譯活動的了解，並為口譯研究開發新的議 題。
112
113
參考文獻
中文書目
中華民國行業分類標準(第八次修訂) (2006)。行業標準分類。民 98 年 6 月 26 日，取自：
http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=16333&ctNode=1309 。 江建良 (1998)。服務業品質觀念與策略作法之探討。商學學報, 6,
114
英文書目
Abeles, H. F. (1973). Development and validation of a clarinet performance adjudication scale. Journal of Research in Music Education, 21(3), 246-255.
Aiello, R. & Williamon, A. (2002). Memory. In R. Parncutt & G.
Mcpherson (Eds.), The Science and Psychology of Music Performance: Creative Strategies for Teaching and Learning (pp.
167-182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Altman, J. (1994). Error analysis in the teaching of simultaneous interpretation: A pilot study. In S. Lambert & B. Moser-Mercer (Eds.), Bridging the Gap: Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation (pp. 25-38). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Anderson, L. (1994). Simultaneous interpretation: Contextual and translation aspects. In S. Lambert & B. Moser-Mercer (Eds.), Bridging the Gap: Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation (pp. 101-120). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Barik, H. C. (1994). In S. Lambert & B. Moser-Mercer (Eds.), Bridging the Gap: Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation (pp.
121-137). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Barry, N. H. & Hallam, S. (2002). Practice. In R. Parncutt & G.
Mcpherson (Eds.), The Science and Psychology of Music Performance: Creative Strategies for Teaching and Learning (pp.
151-166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bergee, M. J. (1987). An application of the facet-factorial approach to scale construction in the development of a rating scale for euphonium and tuba music performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence.
115
Bergee, M. J. (1988). The use of an objectively constructed rating scale for the evaluation of brass juries: A criterion-related study. Missouri Journal of Research in Music Education, 5(5), 6-25.
Bergee, M. J. (1993). A comparison of faculty, peer and self-evaluation of brass juries: A criterion-related study. Missouri Journal of Research in Music Education, 5, 6-25.
Bergee, M. J. (1995). Primary and higher-order factors in a scale assessing concert band performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research for Music Education, 126, 1-14.
Bergee, M. J. (2003). Faculty interjudge reliability of music performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51(2), 137-150.
Bergee, M. J. (2007). Performer, rater, occasion, and sequence as sources of variability in music performance assessment. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55(4), 344-358.
Bergee, M. J. & Platt, M. C. (2003). Influence of selected variables on solo and small-ensemble festival ratings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51(4), 342-353.
Bergee, M. J. & Westfall, C. R. (2005). Stability of a model explaining selected extramusical influences on solo and small-ensemble festival ratings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53(4),358-374.
Blom, D. & Poole, K. (2004). Peer assessment of tertiary music performance: Opportunities for understanding performance assessment and performing through experience and self-reflection.
British Journal of Music Education, 21(1), 111-125.
Brandon, S. N. (2004). Heifetz, Shaw, & a Blueprint for teaching the arts.
http://www.educationupdate.com/archives/2004/august/html/mad_h aifetz.html (accessed 26 June 2009).
116
Bühler, H. (1986). Linguistic (semantic) and extra-linguistic (pragmatic) criteria for the evaluation of conference interpretation and interpreters. Multilingua, 5(4), 231-235.
Burrack, F. (2002). Enhanced assessment in instrumental programs.
Music Educators Journal, 88(6), 27-32.
Cantor, J.R. & Zillman, D. (1973). The effect of affective state and emotional arousal on music appreciation. Journal of General Psychology, 89, 97-108.
Cantwell, R. H. & Jeanneret, N. (2004). Developing a framework for the assessment of musical learning: Resolving the dilemma of he
“parts” and the “whole”. Research Studies in Music Education, 22(1), 2-13.
Cartellieri, C. (1983). The inescapable dilemma: Quality and/or quantity in interpreting. Babel, 29(4), 209-213.
Catell. R. B. & Anderson, J. C. (1953). The measurement of personality and behavior disorders by the IPAT Music Preference Test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37, 446-454.
Clifford, A. (2005). Putting the exam to the test: Psychometric validation and interpreter certification. Interpreting, 7(1), 97-131.
Cope, C. O. (1996). Steps toward effective assessment. Music Educators Journal, 83(1), 39-42.
Cross, I. (2004). Music and meaning, ambiguity and evolution. In D.
Miell, R. M MacDonald, & D. Hargreaves (Eds.), Musical Communication (pp. 27-44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Daniel, R. (2001). Self-assessment in performance. British Journal of Music Education, 18(3), 215-226.
De Poli, G. (2004). Methodologies for expressiveness modeling of and for music performance. Journal of New Music Research, 33(3),
117
189-202.
Dixon, S. (2000). Assessing the performer.
Drake, C. & Palmer, C. (2000). Skill acquisition in music performance:
Relations between planning and temporal control. Cognition, 74(1), 1-32.
Dreyfus, H. L. & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of Computer. New York: The Free Press
Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49(8), 725-747.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance.
Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406.
Fink, K. E. (2006). Perceptual acoustic assessment of singing. Journal of Singing, 63(1), 35-43.
Finney, S. A. & Palmer, C. (2003). Auditory feedback and memory for music performance: Sound evidence for an encoding effect.
Memory & Cognition, 31(1), 51-64.
Fiske, H. E. (1975). Judge-group differences in the rating of secondary school trumpet performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23(3), 186-196.
Fiske, H. E. (1977). The relationship of selected factors in trumpet performance adjudication. Journal of Music Education Research, 25(4), 256-263.
Fiske, H. E. (1983). Judging musical performances: Methods or madness?
Update, 7-10.
Flores, R. G. & Ginsburgh, V. A. (1996). The Queen Elisabeth musical
118
competition: How fair is the final ranking? The Statistician, 45, 97-104.
Friberg, A. & Battel, G. U. (2002). Structural communication. In R.
Parncutt & G. Mcpherson (Eds.), The Science and Psychology of Music Performance: Creative Strategies for Teaching and Learning (pp. 199-218). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gabrielsson, A. (2003). Music performance research at the millennium.
Psychology of Music, 31(3), 221-272.
Gerver, D., Longley, P., Long, J., & Lambert, S. (1984). Selecting trainee conference interpreters: A preliminary study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 57(1), 17-31.
Gile, D. (1995a). Communication and quality in interpretation and translation. Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gile, D. (1995b). Fidelity assessment in consecutive interpretation: An experiment. Target, 7(1), 151-164.
Goolsby, T. W. (1995). Portfolio assessment for better evaluation. Music Educators Journal, 82(3), 39-44.
Goolsby, T. W. (1999). Assessment in instrumental music. Music Educators Journal, 86(2), 31-35.
Gozzi, R. (2005). Communication as making music. ETC.: A Review of General Semantics, 62(2), 207-209.
Hartley, A., Mason, I., Peng, G., & Perez, I. (2003). Peer- and Self-assessment in conference interpreter training.
http://www.llas.ac.uk/projects/1454 (accessed 3 March 2009).
Heijink, H., Desain, P., Honing, H., & Windsor, L. (2000). Make me a match: An evaluation of different approaches to score-performance matching. Computer Music Journal, 24(1), 43-56.
119
Herbert, J. (1952). The Interpreter’s Handbook: How to Become a Conference Interpreter. Geneva: Georg.
Inskip, C. & MacFarlane, A. (2008). Meaning, communication, music:
Towrads a revised communication model. Journal of Documentation, 64(5), 687-706.
Isham, W. P. (1994). Memory for sentence form after simultaneous interpretation: Evidence both for and against deverbalization. In S.
Lambert & B. Moser-Mercer (Eds.), Bridging the Gap: Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation (pp. 191-212). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Johnson, P. (1997). Performance as experience: the problem of assessment criteria. British Journal of Music Education, 14(3), 271-282.
Jones, H. (1986). An application of the facet-factorial approach to scale construction in the development of a rating scale for high school vocal solo performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma.
Juslin, P. N. (2000). Cue utilization in communication of emotion in music performance: Relating performance to perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26(6), 1797-1813.
Juslin, P. N. & Persson, R. S. (2002). Emotional communication. In R.
Parncutt & G. Mcpherson (Eds.), The Science and Psychology of Music Performance: Creative Strategies for Teaching and Learning (pp. 219-236). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kahane, E. (2000). Thoughts on the quality of interpretation.
http://www.aiic.net/ ViewPage.cfm?page_id=197 (accessed 18 December 2008).
Kalina, S. (2000). Interpreting competences as a basis and a goal for teaching. The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 10, 3-32.
120
Kalina, S. (2005). Quality assurance for interpreting process. Meta, 50(2), 768-784.
Kalina, S. (2007). Microphone off – Application of the process model of interpreting to the classroom. Kalbotyra, 57(3), 111-121.
Kane, M., Crooks, T., & Cohen, A. (1999). Validating measures of performance. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18(2),5-17.
Kinney, D. W. (2009). Internal consistency of performance evaluations as a function of music expertise and excerpt familiarity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(4), 322-337.
Kopczynski, A. (1994). Quality in conference interpreting: Some pragmatic problems. In S. Lambert & B. Moser-Mercer (Eds.), Bridging the Gap: Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation (pp. 87-99). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kurz, I. (1989). Conference interpreting: User expectations. In D. L.
Hammond (Eds.), Coming of Age. Proceedings of the 30 th Annual Conference of the American Translator Association (pp.143-148).
Medford: NJL Learned Information, Inc.
Kurz, I. (1993). Conference interpretation: Expectations of different user groups. In F. Pöchhacker & M. Shlesinger (Eds.), The Interpreting Studies Reader. (pp.313-324). London and New York: Routledge.
Kurz, I. (2001). Conference interpreting: Quality in the ears of the user.
Meta, 46(2), 394-409.
Lehmann, A. C., Sloboda, J. A., & Woody, R. H. (2007). Psychology for Musicians: Understanding and Acquiring the Skills. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Lerdahl, F. & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A Generative Theory of Tonal Music, Cambridge: MIT Press.
121
Linell, P. (1997). Interpreting as communication. In Y. Gambier, D. Gile,
& C. Taylor (Eds.), Conference Interpreting: Current Trends in Research. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interpreting: What Do We Know and How? (pp.49-67). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Liu, M., Schallert, D. L., & Carroll, P. J. (2004). Working memory and expertise in simultaneous interpreting. Interpreting, 6(1), 19-42.
Livingstone, S. R., Muhlberger, R., & Brown, A. (2005). Playing with affect: Music performance with awareness of score and audience.
In T. Opie & A. R. Brown (Eds.), Australasian Computer Music Conference. (pp.92-98). Brisbane: ACMA.
Maugars, C. (2006). Attitudes of music teachers towards final examinations in the French music conservatoires. International Journal of Music Education, 24(1), 43-55.
McPherson, G. E. (1995). The assessment of musical performance:
Development and validation of five new measures. Psychology of Music, 23, 142-161.
McPherson, G. E. & Schubert, E. (2004). Measuring performance enhancement in music. In A. Williamon (Eds.), Musical Excellence.
(pp. 61-82). New York: Oxford University Press.
McPherson, G. E. & Thompson, W. F. (1998). Assessing music performance: Issues and influences. Research Studies in Music Education, 10(1), 10-24.
Mills, J. (1991). Assessing musical performance musically. Educational Studies, 17(2), 173-181.
Moser, P. (1995). Survey on Expectations of Users of Conference Interpretation: Final Report. Geneva: AIIC.
Moser, P. (1996). Expectations of users of conference interpretation.
Interpreting, 1(2), 145-178.
122
Moser-Mercer, Barbara (1996). Quality in interpreting: Some methodological issues. The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 7, 43-55.
Moser-Mercer, B. (1997). Skill components in simultaneous interpreting.
In Y. Gambier, D. Gile, & C. Taylor (Eds.), Conference Interpreting:
Current Trends in Research. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interpreting: What Do We Know and How? (pp.
133-148). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Nakamura, T. (1987). The communication of dynamics between musicians and listeners through musical performance. Perception
& Psychophysics, 41(6), 525-533.
Palm, T. (2008). Performance assessment and authentic assessment: A conceptual analysis of the literature. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 13(4), 1-11.
Palmer, C. (1997). Music performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 115-138.
Palmer, C. (2005). Sequence memory in music performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 247-250.
Palmer, C. & Drake, C. (1997). Monitoring and planning capacities in the acquisition of music performance skills. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51(4), 369-384.
Parasurama, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research.
Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
Peng, K. C. (2006). The development of coherence and quality of performance in conference interpreter training. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds.
Pöchhacker, F. (2001). Quality assessment in conference and community interpreting. Meta, 46(2), 410-425.
123
Pöchhacker, F. (2004). Introducing Interpreting Studies. London and New York: Routledge.
Repp, B. H. (1992). Diversity and commonality in music performance:
An analysis of timing microstructure in Schumann’s “Träumerei”.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92(5), 2546-2568.
Repp, B. H. (1995). Expressive timing in Schumann’s “Träumerei”: An analysis of performances by graduate student pianists. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98(5), 2413-2427.
Ryan, C., Wapnick, J., Lacaille, N., & Darrow, A. (2006). The effects of various physical characteristics of high-level performers on adjudicators’ performance ratings. Psychology of Music, 34(4), 559-572.
Saunders, C. T. (1993). The assessment of music performance:
Techniques for classroom and rehearsal. Newsletter of the Special Research Interest Group in Measurement and Evaluation (MENC).
In R. Colwell & R. Ambrose (Eds.), 15, 7-11
Sawyer, D. B. (2004). Fundamental Aspects of Interpreter Education.
Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Scott, S., (2004). Evaluating tasks for performance-based assessments:
Advice for music teachers. General Music Today, 17(2), 17-27.
Seleskovitch, D. (1986). Comment: Who should assess an interpreter’s performance? Multilingua, 5(4), 326.
Shlesinger, M., et al. (1997). Quality in simultaneous interpreting. In Y.
Gambier, D. Gile, & C. Taylor (Eds.), Conference Interpreting:
Current Trends in Research. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interpreting: What Do We Know and How? (pp.
123-131). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sloboda, J. A. (1985). The Musical Mind: The Cognitive Psychology of Music. New York: Oxford University Press.
124
Sloboda, J. A. (2000). Individual differences in music performance.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(4), 397-403.
Smith, B. P. & Barnes, G. V. (2007). Development and validation of an orchestra performance rating scale. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55(3), 268-280.
Stanley, M., Brooker, R., & Gilber, R. (2002). Examiner perceptions of using criteria in music performance assessment. Research Studies in Music Education, 18(1), 46-52.
Swanwick, K. (1996). Teaching and assessing. Newsletter of the Special Research Interest Group in Measurement and Evaluation (MENC), R. Colwell & J. Roberts (Eds.), Winter, 18, 6-9.
Thompson, S. (2007). Determinants of listeners’ enjoyment of a performance. Psychology of Music, 35(1), 20-36.
Thompson, W. F., Bella, S. D., & Keller, P. E. (2006). Music performance.
Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2(2-3), 99-102.
Thompson, W. F. & Cuddy, L. (1997). Music performance and the perception of key. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23(1), 116-135.
Tijus, C. A. (1997). Understanding for interpreting, interpreting for understanding. In Y. Gambier, D. Gile, & C. Taylor (Eds.), Conference Interpreting: Current Trends in Research. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interpreting: What Do We Know and How? (pp. 29-48). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Torsello, C. (1997). Linguistics, discourse analysis and interpretation. In Y. Gambier, D. Gile, & C. Taylor (Eds.), Conference Interpreting:
Current Trends in Research. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interpreting: What Do We Know and How? (pp.
167-186). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
125
Tsui, Amy B. M. (2003). Understanding Expertise in Teaching: Case Studies of ESL Teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
van Galen, G., & Wing, A.M. (1984). The sequencing of movements. In M.Smyth, & A. M. Wing, The Psychology of Human Movement, (pp.153-182). London: Academic Press.
Viaggio, S. (1991). Teaching beginners to shut up and listen. The Interpreters’ Newsletter, No. 4, 45-58
Vianna, B. (2005). Simultaneous interpreting: A relevance-theoretic approach. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(2), 169-190.
Vuorikoski, A. R. (1998). User responses to simultaneous interpreting. In L. Bowker, M. Cronin, D. Kenny, & J. Pearson (Eds.), Current Trends in Translation Studies (pp. 187-194). Manchester, UK: St.
Jerome.
Wapnick, J., Flowers, P., Alegant, M., & Jasinskas, L. (1993).
Consistency in piano performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 282-292.
Wapnick, J., Ryan, C., & Lacaille, N. (2004). Effects of selected variables on musicians’ ratings of high-level piano performances.
International Journal of Music Education, 22(1), 7-20.
Weaver, W. (1949). Recent contributions to he mathematical theory of communication. In C. Shannon, & W. Weaver (Eds.), The Mathematical Theory of Communication (pp. 1-28). Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Wells, R. (1998). The student’s role in the assessment process. Teaching Music, 6(2), 32-33.
Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2(2).
http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=2&n=2 (accessed 27 November, 2008).
126
Winter, N. (1993). Music performance assessment: A study of the effects of training and experience on the criteria used by music examiners.
Interntional Journal of music Education, 22(1), 34-39.
Wolak, R., Kalafatis, S., & Harris, P. (1998). An Investigation into four characteristics of services. Journal of Empirical Generalisations in Marketing Science, 3(2), 22-41.
Woody, R. (2000). Getting into their heads. The American Music Teacher, 49(3), 24-27
Zdzinski, S. F. & Barnes, G. V. (2002). Development and validation of a string performance rating scale. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50(3), 245-255.
Zwischenberger, C., Pöchhacker, F., & Kurz, I.(2008).
Quality and role: The professionals’ view. Communicate!,
http://www.aiic.net/ViewPage.cfm/page3044.htm (accessed 13 January 2009).