• 沒有找到結果。

第五章 結論與建議

第四節 研究限制與未來研究方向

SEM 參數估計有同時考慮測量模型與關係結構,迴歸只考慮結構沒考慮衡 量問題。受限於研究時間與資源,本研究因為樣本數少只能以 SPSS 分析,建議 未來可以廣泛蒐集資料並以 SEM 分析,進一步確認模型的可行性。

本研究為簡化起見只考慮風險態度與累積效應作為調節變數,分別看期盼對 購買意願的影響關係。未來研究可考慮研究累積效應是否改變風險態度,或者累 積效應與風險態度的交互作用對購買意願的影響。

本研究將累積效應以類別變數來分析,未來可廣泛蒐集樣本,並將累積效應 當連續變數,加入風險態度一同討論,分析結果。

本研究將期盼當成討論變數,期盼是人受環境影響所產生的正面情緒。未來 可將其他情緒變數納入考慮,看與累積效應的交互作用對購買意願的影響關係。

36

參考文獻

Ariyabuddhiphongs, V. (2011). Lottery gambling: A review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(1), 15-33.

Armstrong, J. S., Morwitz, V. G., & Kumar, V. (2000). Sales forecasts for existing consumer products and services: Do purchase intentions contribute to accuracy?

International Journal of Forecasting, 16(3), 383-397.

Averill, J. R., Catlin, G., & Chon, K. K. (1990). Rules of hope Springer Science &

Business Media.

Azmier, J. (2000). Gambling in canada: Triumph, tragedy, or tradeoff. canadian gambling behavior and attitudes. Calgary, Alberta: Canada West Foundation, Bansal, H. S., & Voyer, P. A. (2000). Word-of-mouth processes within a services

purchase decision context. Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 166-177.

Barnes, G. M., Welte, J. W., Tidwell, M. O., & Hoffman, J. H. (2011). Gambling on the lottery: Sociodemographic correlates across the lifespan. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(4), 575-586.

Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367.

Chang, L. (2008). Estimating risk recognition of environmental catastrophe using expected utility theory.

Cheung, H. Y., Wu, J., & Tao, J. (2013). Risk perception and risk-taking attitude: A comparison between hong kong and mainland chinese undergraduate students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 497-506.

Chiu, J., & Storm, L. (2010). Personality, perceived luck and gambling attitudes as predictors of gambling involvement. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(2), 205-227.

Dahlbäck, O. (1990). Personality and risk-taking. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(12), 1235-1242.

de Mello, G. E., MacInnis, D., & Stewart, D. (2005). Goal-motivated reasoning: The lure of the" yes, I can" conclusion. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 466.

37

De Mello, G., MacInnis, D. J., & Stewart, D. W. (2007). Threats to hope: Effects on reasoning about product information. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 153-161.

Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, , 307-319.

Donkers, B., Melenberg, B., & Van Soest, A. (2001). Estimating risk attitudes using lotteries: A large sample approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 22(2), 165-195.

Du, X., Li, J., & Du, X. (2014). Testing risk-taking behavior in chinese undergraduate students. PloS One, 9(5), e97989.

Forrest, D., Gulley, O. D., & Simmons, R. (2010). The relationship between betting and lottery play. Economic Inquiry, 48(1), 26-38.

Friedman, M., & Savage, L. J. (1948). The utility analysis of choices involving risk.

The Journal of Political Economy, , 279-304.

Hu, X., & Xie, X. (2012). Validation of the domain-specific risk-taking scale in chinese college students. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(2), 181-188.

Johansson, A., & Götestam, K. G. (2003). Gambling and problematic gambling with money among norwegian youth (12-18 years). Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 57(4), 317-321.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, , 263-291.

Kassinove, J. I. (1998). Development of the gambling attitude scales: Preliminary findings. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(6), 763-771.

Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1967). Risk taking as a function of the situation, the person, and the group. New Directions in Psychology, 3, 111-278.

Landman, J., & Petty, R. (2000). “It could have been you”: How states exploit counterfactual thought to market lotteries. Psychology & Marketing, 17(4), 299-321.

38

Lin, C., & Lai, C. (2006). Substitute effects between lotto and big lotto in taiwan.

Applied Economics Letters, 13(10), 655-658.

MacInnis, D. J., & Chun, H. E. (2007). Understanding hope and its implications for consumer behavior: I hope, therefore I consume Now Publishers Inc.

MacInnis, D. J., & De Mello, G. E. (2005). The concept of hope and its relevance to product evaluation and choice. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 1-14.

MacInnis, D. J., & Price, L. L. (1987). The role of imagery in information processing:

Review and extensions. Journal of Consumer Research, , 473-491.

March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking.

Management Science, 33(11), 1404-1418.

Markiewicz, Ł., & Weber, E. U. (2013). Dospert's gambling risk-taking propensity scale predicts excessive stock trading. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 14(1), 65-78.

McMullan, J. L., & Miller, D. (2009). Wins, winning and winners: The commercial advertising of lottery gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(3), 273-295.

Mishra, S., Lalumière, M. L., & Williams, R. J. (2010). Gambling as a form of risk-taking: Individual differences in personality, risk-accepting attitudes, and behavioral preferences for risk. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 616-621.

Mukherjee, K. (2011). Thinking styles and risky decision‐making: Further exploration of the affect–probability weighting link. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24(5), 443-455.

Oskamp, S. (1991). Attitudes and options.

Parsons, K., & Webster, D. (2000). The consumption of gambling in everyday life.

Journal of Consumer Studies & Home Economics, 24(4), 263-271.

Payne, J. W., Laughhunn, D. J., & Crum, R. (1980). Translation of gambles and aspiration level effects in risky choice behavior. Management Science, 26(10), 1039-1060.

39

Perez, L., & Forrest, D. (2011). Own‐And Cross‐Price elasticities for games within A state lottery portfolio. Contemporary Economic Policy, 29(4), 536-549.

Reimann, M., Nenkov, G. Y., MacInnis, D., & Morrin, M. (2014). The role of hope in financial risk seeking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(4), 349.

Rogers, P. (1998). The cognitive psychology of lottery gambling: A theoretical review.

Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(2), 111-134.

Rossiter, J. R., & Percy, L. (1987). Advertising and promotion management.

McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Scott, F., & Garen, J. (1994). Probability of purchase, amount of purchase, and the demographic incidence of the lottery tax. Journal of Public Economics, 54(1), 121-143.

Snyder, C. R. (2000). Handbook of hope: Theory, measures, and applications Academic press.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions.

Journal of Business, , S251-S278.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (New York, N.Y.), 185(4157), 1124-1131.

Wang, Y. (2014). Consumers’ purchase intentions of shoes: Theory of planned behavior and desired attributes. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 6(4), p50.

Weber, E. U., Blais, A., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain‐specific risk‐attitude scale:

Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(4), 263-290.

Weinstock, E., & Sonsino, D. (2014). Are risk-seekers more optimistic?

non-parametric approach. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 108, 236-251.

Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M., & Parker, J. (2002).

Gambling participation in the US—results from a national survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18(4), 313-337.

40

吳奇峰. (2008). 台北地區樂透彩券與運動彩券購買動機與行為之研究. 未出版, 台北縣, 華梵大學,

吳馨仁. (2007). 網路福袋的知覺價值與購買意願之影響因子.

周妙玲. (2013). 臺灣購買公益彩券家庭之特性分析.

張威龍, 鄭如珍, & 蕭君華. (2007). 樂透購買行為, 金錢態度和其它強迫性行為 之關係. 行銷評論, 4(2), 243-261.

林為翰. (2004). 大專學生借貸態度研究—自消費文化與人格特質觀點探討. 成 功大學工業與資訊管理學系學位論文, , 1-76.

林靖中, 康信鴻, & 詹司如. (2004). 以時間數列觀點談樂透銷售量之行銷策略意 涵. 臺大管理論叢, 15(2), 99-121.

王正治. (2004). 風險趨避程度對醫師業務責任險需求影響之研究.

羅詩婷. (2004). 我國樂透彩券的需求與歸宿研究,

謝宗霖. (2013). 運動彩券投注者資訊需求與消費行為之研究. 運動休閒管理學 報, 10(2), 112-134.

賴欣儀. (2000). 消費者風險態度與資金運用行為對銀行信用卡業務影響之研究.

未出版, 國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所, 高雄市,

黃韻真. (2012). 網路福袋購買意願影響因素之研究. 臺灣師範大學管理研究所 學位論文, , 1-76.

鹿元忠. (2003). 台北市地區彩券購買行為之研究. 碩士論文.淡江大學管理科學 研究所,

Trendgo 行銷人電子報. (2013). 送金龍迎蛇神,過年試手氣,您有樂透嗎?

林建煌(2013)消費者行為。消費者行為(第四版)。台北:華泰文化事業股份有 限公司

41

附錄

附錄一: 累積效應操弄版本 1. 低累積效應操弄

42

2. 中累積效應操弄

43

3. 高累積效應操弄

44

附錄二 主要問卷題項 先生/女士您好:

非常感謝您在百忙之中抽空參與本問卷,我們是國立臺灣師範大學管理研 究所的師生,正進行「大樂透購買意願」研究,需要您的幫忙以進行相關分析。

本問卷會先請您回答部分題項,再瀏覽一段敘述,閱畢後,回答後續題項。

資料蒐集完畢後,將從有效樣本抽取 10 名幸運兒,可獲得 7-11 禮卷。若 您欲參加抽獎,請留下您的聯繫方式;若您不參加抽獎,可不留。

本問卷為學術性研究,絕不用於其他用途,並嚴加保密,敬請安心作答。

您的回答對本研究有極大的貢獻,請用您最真實的感覺來填答。再次向您致上 十二萬分的謝意!

敬祝

健康快樂 生活順心

國立臺灣師範大學管理研究所 指導教授:周世玉 博士 研究生:陳美如 Email:60255001O@ntnu.edu.tw 中華民國 104 年 4 月

45

□20000~29999 元

□30000~39999 元

□40000~49999 元

□50000~59999 元

□60000 元(含)以上

46

47

相關文件