第五章 結論與建議
第三節 進一步研究之建議
本研究僅專注於如何藉由相似性測量，以及將類別相似性加入多樣性指標，
呈現使用者的閱讀偏好多樣性，對於其他影響閱讀多樣性之因素，並未深入探究。
然而，應有閱讀背景因素如閱讀書籍總量、讀者面對閱讀的態度等因素皆可能對 閱讀偏好多樣性產生影響。例如，過去一般認為書櫃擁有者之書籍總數，與閱讀 偏好多樣性有關。
研究資料處理過程中，初步觀察個別書櫃書籍總數與分群數之數值分布，發 現書籍總數愈多的書籍，其閱讀偏好多樣性可能愈高。在進一步針對本研究計算 之相似性測量之分群結果、使用者自評之閱讀偏好多樣性與個別書櫃書籍總數做 相關分析，結果卻發現與使用者自評多樣性相關性愈顯著之相似性測量，與書籍 總數的相關性顯著性愈低。
此外，實際將研究中之分群數與個別書櫃書籍總數，作為預測使用者自評之 多樣性的變數，簡單線性回歸結果顯示書籍總數違背排除的變數，而相似性測量 產生的分群數與使用者自評之多樣性呈現顯著正相關。上述結果可發現，我們無 法直接利用書籍總數作為判斷使用者閱讀偏好多樣性的依據，儘管一般而言書籍 總數愈多，閱讀偏好多樣性也愈高。
關於使用者書櫃書籍總數的多寡，除了可能受使用者閱讀偏好多樣性的影響，
在網路服務中，加入網路書櫃服務時間愈長，書籍總數也會愈多。因此，閱讀的 背景因素暫時沒有直接與閱讀偏好多樣性呈現高度相關的現象，其與閱讀偏好多 樣性之交互作用卻值得進一步探究。閱讀偏好多樣性與其他閱讀相關背景因素之 研究，可進一步研究其他因素是否能加入增加解釋使用者自評多樣性的能力，例 如閱讀對讀者的重要性、使用網路書櫃的頻率。
參考文獻
一.西文部分
Aiello, L. M., Barrat, A., Cattuto, C., Ruffo, G., & Schifanella, R. (2010, 20-22 Aug.
2010). Link Creation and Profile Alignment in the aNobii Social Network.
Paper presented at the Social Computing (SocialCom), 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on.
Armstrong, A., & Hagel Iii, J. (1996). The real value of on line communities. Harvard
Business Review, 74(3), 134.
Bell, Robert M., & Koren, Yehuda. (2007). Lessons from the Netflix prize challenge.
SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 9(2), 75-79. doi: 10.1145/1345448.1345465
Bennett, J., & Lanning, S. (2007). The Netflix Prize. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the KDD Cup Workshop 2007, New
York. http://www.cs.uic.edu/~liub/KDD-cup-2007/NetflixPrize-description.pd
f
Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 187-217. doi:
10.1086/209535
Buldú, Javier M, Cano, P, Koppenberger, M, Almendral, Juan A, & Boccaletti, S.
(2007). The complex network of musical tastes. New Journal of Physics, 9(6), 172.
Dieberger, A., Dourish, P., Höök, K., Resnick, P., & Wexelblat, A. (2000). Social navigation: techniques for building more usable systems. interactions, 7(6), 36-45. doi: 10.1145/352580.352587
Dourish, P., & Chalmers, M. (1994). Running Out of Space: Models of information navigation HCI, Glasgow.
Franke, Nikolaus, Keinz, Peter, & Steger, Christoph J. (2009). Testing the Value of Customization: When Do Customers Really Prefer Products Tailored to Their Preferences? Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 103-121. doi:
10.1509/jmkg.73.5.103
Hanneman, R.A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to Social Network Methods:
University of California.
Haubl, G., & Murray, K. B. (2003). Preference construction and persistence in digital
marketplaces: The role of electronic recommendation agents. Journal of
Consumer Psychology, 13(1-2), 75-91. doi: 10.1207/153276603768344807
Holbrook, Morris B., & Hirschman, Elizabeth C. (1982). The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun. Journal of Consumer
Research, 9(2), 132-140. doi: 10.2307/2489122
Hopper, Rosemary. (2005). What are teenagers reading? Adolescent fiction reading habits and reading choices. Literacy, 39(3), 113-120. doi:
10.1111/j.1467-9345.2005.00409.x
Kari, Jarkko, & Hartel, Jenna. (2007). Information and higher things in life:
Addressing the pleasurable and the profound in information science. Journal
of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(8),
1131-1147. doi: 10.1002/asi.20585Klavans, Richard, & Boyack, Kevin W. (2006). Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 251-263. doi: 10.1002/asi.20274
Kramer, T. (2007). The effect of measurement task transparency on preference construction and evaluations of personalized recommendations. Journal of
Marketing Research, 44(2), 224-233. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.44.2.224
Kwon, Kwiseok, Cho, Jinhyung, & Park, Yongtae. (2009). Influences of customer preference development on the effectiveness of recommendation strategies.
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(5), 263-275.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2009.04.004
Lancaster, F.W. (1998). Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice: Library Association Publishing.
Leydesdorff, Loet, & Vaughan, Liwen. (2006). Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the Web environment.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(12), 1616-1628. doi: 10.1002/asi.20335
Mikkonen, Anna, & Vakkari, Pertti. (2012). Readers' search strategies for accessing books in public libraries 4th Information Interaction in Context Symposium (pp. 214-223).
Pejtersen, Annelise Mark, & Austin, Jutta. (1983). FICTION RETRIEVAL:
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF A SEARCH SYSTEM BASED ON USERS' VALUE CRITERIA (PART 1). Journal of
Documentation, 39(4), 230-246. doi: 10.1108/eb026750
Peppers, D., Rogers, M., & Rogers, M. (1999). The One to One Manager: An
Executive's Guide to Custom Relationship Management: Bantam Doubleday
Dell Publishing Group.Pinney, J.W. & Westhead, D.R. (2006). Betweenness-based decomposition methods for social and biological networks In S. Barber, P.D. Baxter, K.V.Mardia, &
R.E. Walls (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Statistics and Bioinformatics, pp. 87-90.
Leeds, Leeds University Press.
Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability: Twenty years of chatting online. Behavior
and Information Technology Journal(20), 347--356.
Purvis, Andy, & Hector, Andy. (2000). Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature,
405(6783), 212-219.
Rafols, Ismael, & Meyer, Martin. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as
indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics,
82(2), 263-287. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y
Ross, Sheldrick Catherine. (1999). Finding without seeking: the information encounter in the context of reading for pleasure. Information Processing &
Management, 35(6), 783-799.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00026-6
Fortunato, S. (2010). Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports, 486(3), 75-174.
Senecal, S., & Nantel, J. (2004). The influence of online product recommendations on consumers' online choices. Journal of Retailing, 80(2), 159-169. doi:
10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.001
Simonson, Itamar. (2005). Determinants of Customers’ Responses to Customized Offers: Conceptual Framework and Research Propositions. Journal of
Marketing, 69(1), 32-45. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.69.1.32.55512
Small, H., & Sweeney, E. (1985). Clustering the science citation index ® using co-citations. Scientometrics, 7(3-6), 391-409. doi: 10.1007/BF02017157 Small, Henry. (2009). Critical thresholds for co-citation clusters and emergence of the
giant component. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 332-340.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.05.001
Spertus, Ellen, Sahami, Mehran, & Buyukkokten, Orkut. (2005). Evaluating similarity
measures: a large-scale study in the orkut social network. Paper presented at
the KDD '05: Proceeding of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD internationalconference on Knowledge discovery in data mining, New York, NY, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1081870.1081956
Stirling, Andrew. (1998). On the Economics and Analysis of Diversity. Electronic
Working Papers Series, 28.
Stirling, Andy. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 707-719. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2007.0213
Svensson, Martin, Höök, Kristina, Laaksolahti, Jarmo, & Waern, Annika. (2001).
Social navigation of food recipes. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the
SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, Washington, United States.Thomas H. Cormen, Charles E. Leiserson, Ronald L. Rivest & Clifford Stein. (2009).
Introduction to Algorithms (pp. 621-622). Massachusetts, MA: MIT press.
Tang, Muh-Chyun, Ting, Pei-Hang, & Sie, Yi-Jin. (2012). Exploring evaluation
criteria of social navigational tools on social media: a case study of aNobii.
Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 4th Information Interaction in Context Symposium, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Taylor, Robert S. (1962). The process of asking questions. American Documentation,
13(4), 391-396. doi: 10.1002/asi.5090130405
Xu, Yunjie. (2007). Relevance judgment in epistemic and hedonic information searches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 58(2), 179-189. doi: 10.1002/asi.20461
二.中文部分
丁培涵. (2011). 網路書櫃使用者偏好結構與瀏覽尋書行為之研究. (碩士), 臺灣 大學. Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database. (2011 年)
李書萍. (2012). 網路書評發表者之書寫動機、平台選擇與使用經驗探討. (碩士), 臺灣大學. Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database. (2012 年)
林珊如, 劉應琳. (2001). 休閒閱讀找書策略與影響因素之探討：以台大 BBS Books 版愛書人為例. 資訊傳播與圖書館學, 8(2), 23-37.
林頌堅. (2010). 以詞語共現網絡分析探勘資訊傳播學領域的研究主題與關係.
圖書資訊學研究, 4(2), pp.123-148.
謝宜瑾. (2012). 從透鏡模式探討影響讀者尋書滿意度之因素