Chapter 3 Results and Discussion
3.3 Analysis and discussion OTFT electric characteristics
Here we focus on the influence of plasma treatment under varied conditions which have different gas of PECVD. They are N
2
, NH3
and no treatment respectively.As shown from Figure 3-23 to Figure 3-25, design of drain current I
D
versus gate voltage VD
at various drain voltage VG
, drain current ID
versus gate voltage V
G
at various drain voltage VD
and drain current ID
versus radical gate voltage VG
at various drain voltage VD
with different plasma treatments.In all figures of different treatment conditions, we can observe that no treatment has best electrical characteristic about I
D
-VG
and NH3
treatment has best electrical characteristic about ID
-VD
. Additionally, we plot the comparison of ID
-VD
, ID
-VG
and ︱ ID
︱1/2
-VG
in the same figure due to observe clearly, they are shown in Figure 3-26. Themagnitude of current at the same operating voltage, NH
3
> no > N2
. Besides, threshold voltage and mobility would be calculated by taking measured data into Eq.(3-1) ~ (3-3). Arrangement of threshold voltage, mobility and on/off ratio is shown in Table 3-3(labeled as no treatment, N2
and NH3
) and Figure 3-27. The mobility in the saturation region and the threshold voltage and on/off ratio of the OTFT are 0.72 cm2
/Vs and -0.616 V and ~103
, respectively.To summarize this section, we can know from the experiment the atmospheric-pressure plasma technology silicon dioxide is worth studying. The advantage of the atmospheric-pressure plasma technology is that it needn't vacuum and at general room temperature to deposit insulator. This advantage is an asset condition to fabricate OTFT.
-2 -1 0 1 2
Le a k a g e Cu rre nt (n A)
Bias ( V ) 0.1sccm
1.0sccm 5.0sccm
(b)
Figure 3-1 The (a)C-V and (b)I-V characteristic of MIM structure with different APPT flow rates
-2 -1 0 1 2
L ea k ag e Cur ren t (n A)
Bias (V)
(b)
Figure 3-2 The (a)C-V and (b)I-V characteristic of MIM structure with Al gate
-2 -1 0 1 2
Le akag e Cur rent (n A)
Bias (V)
(b)
Figure 3-3 The (a)C-V and (b)I-V characteristic of MIM structure with Ni gate
-2 -1 0 1 2
L eak age Cur ren t ( nA )
Bias (V)
(b)
Figure 3-4 The (a)C-V and (b)I-V characteristic of MIM structure with TaN gate
-2 -1 0 1 2
Le akag e Cur rent (n A)
Bias (V)
(b)
Figure 3-5 The (a)C-V and (b)I-V characteristic of MIM structure with Ir gate
-2 -1 0 1 2
Le akag e Cur rent (n A)
Bias (V)
(b)
Figure 3-6 The (a)C-V and (b)I-V characteristic of MIM structure with Pd gate
-2 -1 0 1 2
Leak age C u rrent Dens it y ( A/c m 2 )
Pd
TaN Ni Ir
Metal gate Al
In same electric field
(b)
Figure 3-7 The (a)C-V and (b)I-E characteristic of MIM structure with different metal gates at 200℃
Table 3-1: The surface roughness of different conditions 溫度
金屬 100℃ 150℃ 200℃
Al 10.895 nm 9.937 nm 8.601 nm
Ni 11.695 nm 3.778 nm 1.950 nm
TaN 6.421 nm 3.882 nm 2.090 nm
Ir 18.422 nm 4.134 nm 3.013 nm
Pd 3.093 nm 2.075 nm 2.467 nm
(a) (b)
(c)
Figure 3-8 The surface roughness of APPT SiO
2
on Al gate at (a)100, (b)150, (c)200 substrate temperature(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 3-9 The surface roughness of APPT SiO
2
on Ni gate at (a)100, (b)150, (c)200 substrate temperature(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 3-10 The surface roughness of APPT SiO
2
on TaN gate at (a)100, (b)150, (c)200 substrate temperature(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 3-11 The surface roughness of APPT SiO
2
on Ir gate at (a)100, (b)150, (c)200 substrate temperature(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 3-12 The surface roughness of APPT SiO
2
on Pd gate at (a)100, (b)150, (c)200 substrate temperature90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
0 2 4 6 8 10
0 2 4 6 8 10
RMS
temperature(
oC)
Al Ni TaN Ir Pd
Figure 3-13 The trend of surface roughness of different conditions
-2 -1 0 1 2
Leakage Current De nsity (A/ c m
2)
Bias (V)
(b)
Figure 3-14 The (a)C-V and (b)I-V characteristic of MIM structure by N
2
plasma treatment with different flow rates-2 -1 0 1 2
Leakage Current De nsity (A/ c m
2)
Bias (V)
(b)
Figure 3-15 The (a)C-V and (b)I-V characteristic of MIM structure by NH
3
plasma treatment with different flow rates-2 -1 0 1 2
Leakage Current De nsity (A/ c m
2)
Bias (V)
(b)
Figure 3-16 The (a)C-V and (b)I-V characteristic of MIM structure by N
2
plasma treatment with different time-2 -1 0 1 2
Leakage Current De nsity (A/ c m
2)
Bias (V)
(b)
Figure 3-17 The (a)C-V and (b)I-V characteristic of MIM structure by NH
3
plasma treatment with different time1 2 3
L e akage Cur rent Den s it y ( A/cm 2 )
Plasma treatment
NH 3
N 2
no
In the same electric field
Figure 3-18 The I-E characteristic of MIM structure with different plasma treatment
Table 3-2: The surface roughness, contact angle and the film thickness of different conditions
Plasma
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 3-19 The roughness of (a)no, (b)N
2
, (c)NH3
plasma treatment2 20
22 24 26
contact angle thickness
Plasma treatment Co nt a c t ang le (
o)
NH
3N
2no
12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6
T h ickness (n m )
Figure 3-20 The film thickness and the contact angle of different plasma treatments
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 3-21 The contact angel of (a)no, (b)N
2
, (c)NH3
plasma treatment(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 3-22 The film thickness of (a)no, (b)N
2
, (c)NH3
plasma treatmentTable 3-3 The s threshold voltage, mobility and on/off ratio of different conditions
Plasma treatment
threshold
voltage(Volt) Mobility(cm
2
/V·s) on/off ratio no -0.616 V 0.56 cm2
/V·s 0.81×103
N2
-0.953 V 0.59 cm2
/V·s 0.47×103
NH3
-0.886 V 0.72 cm2
/V·s 0.41×103
0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 -2.0
Figure 3-23 I
D
-VD
for different plasmas treatments (a) no treatment (b) N treatment (c) NH treatment-2.6 -2.4 -2.2 -2.0 -1.8 -1.6 -1.4 -1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2
Figure 3-24 I
D
-VG
for different plasmas treatments (a) no treatment (b) N treatment (c) NH treatment-2.6 -2.4 -2.2 -2.0 -1.8 -1.6 -1.4 -1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0
| Drain Current |1/2(A)
(a)
| Drain Current |1/2(A)
(b)
| Drain Current |1/2(A)
(c)
Figure 3-25 ︱ I
D
︱1/2
-VG
for different plasmas treatments (a) no treatment (b) N2
treatment (c) NH3
treatment0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 -2.0
| Drain Current |1/2(A)
(c)
Figure 3-26 The comparison of (a) I
D
-VD
(b) ID
-VG
(c) ︱ ID
︱1/2
-VG
with different treatments2
Figure 3-27 The s threshold voltage, mobility and on/off ratio of different conditions
Chapter 4
Conclusions and Future work
4.1 Conclusions
We can know from the experiment the flow of carrier gases will influence the quantity that the TEOS gas comes out. The increasing of the flow rate about carrier gases leads to the increasing of released TEOS gas.
But depositing is too quickly to make good quality of insulator.
And we can learn from the experiment the nickel is most suitable for using APPT to deposit the oxidize layer.
After plasma treatment, the insulator surface characteristic is caused to have exiguity changes. For example, there are the change of the surface roughness and contact angle. And the plasma treatment has the effect to reduce leakage current.
In summary, OTFT using pentacene as an active layer are fabricated on insulator deposited by APPT. The mobility in the saturation region and the threshold voltage and on/off ratio of the OTFT are 0.72 cm
2
/Vs and -0.616 V and ~103
, respectively. The advantage of the atmospheric-pressure plasma technology is that it needn't vacuum and at general room temperature to deposit insulator. This advantage is an asset condition to fabricate OTFT.4.2 Future work
The new method, for example, use plastics substrate as the base, so
that it’s more suitable for OTFT which is flexibility and lightness.
Spinning organic polymeric gate dielectrics on oxide which is deposited by APPT achieve the result of reducing roughness.
Simultaneously, we can improve the hydrophilic and hydrophobic question for organic semiconductor by organic polymeric gate dielectrics.
Because pentacene OTFT is sensitive to ambient conditions.
Protection from the environment by encapsulation is critical to the stability of pentacene OTFT. Therefore, using a suitable material as passivation to protect pentacene film from environmental effect is another important topic.
References
﹝1﹞ C. Reese, M. Roberts, M. M. Ling, and Z. Bao, Mater. Today 7, 20 (2004).
﹝2﹞ C. D. Dimitrakopoulos and P. R. L. Malenfant, Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) 14, 99 (2002).
﹝3﹞ A. Afzali, C. D. Dimitrakopoulos, and T. L. Breen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 8812 (2002).
﹝4﹞ C. J. Drury, C. M. Mutsaers, C. M. Hart, M. Matters and D. M. de Leeuw:
Appl. Phys. Lett. 73 (1998) 108.
﹝5﹞ M. G. Kane, J. Campi, M. S. Hammond, F. P. Cuomo, B. Greening, C. D.
Sheraw, J. A. Nichols, D. J. Gundlach, J. R. Huang, C. C. Kuo, L. Jia, L. H.
Klauk and T. N. Jackson: IEEE Electron Device Lett. 21 (2001) 534.
﹝6﹞ W. Fix, A. Ullmann, J. Ficker and Clemens: Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 (2002) 1735.
﹝7﹞ C. D. Sheraw, L. Zhou, J. R. Huang, D. J. Gundlach, T. N. Jackson, M. G.
Kane, I. G. Hill, M. S. Hammond, J. Campi, B. K. Greening, J. Francl and J.
West: Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 (2002) 1088.
﹝8﹞ Y. Fujisaki, Y. Inoue, H. Sato, T. Kurita, S. Tokito and H. Fujikake: Proc. Int.
Display Workshop (2003) (IDW’03), p. 291.
﹝9﹞ Y. Inoue, Y. Fujisaki, T. Suzuki, S. Tokito, T. Kurita, M. Mizukami, N.
Hirohata, T. Tada and S. Yagyu: Proc. Int. Display Workshop (2004) (IDW’04), p. 355.
﹝10﹞ H. E. Katz, Z. Bao and S. L. Gilat: Acc. Chem. Res. 34 (2001) 359.
﹝11﹞ Y. Y. Lin, D. J. Gundlach, S. F. Nelson and T. N. Jackson: IEEE Electron Device Lett. 18 (1997) 606.
﹝12﹞ F. J. Mayer zu Heringdorf, M. C. Reuter and R. M. Tromp: Nature 412 (2001)
517.
﹝13﹞ D. J. Gundlach, H. Klauk, C. D. Cheraw, C. C. Kuo, J. R. Huang and T. N.
Jackson: Electron Devices Meet., 1999, IEDM Tech. Dig.,Washington, D.C., (1999), p. 111.
﹝14﹞ M. Pope, C. E. Swenberg, “Electronic processes in organic crystal and polymers,”2
nd
ed, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.337-340, 1999.﹝15﹞ L. Torsi, A. Dodabalapur, L.J. Rothberg, A.W.P. Fung, H.E. Kazt
﹝16﹞ Chrisos D. Dimitrakopoulos, D, J. Mascaro, “Organic thin film transistors: A review of recent advances “IBM J. RES. & DEV. 45(1), 11, (2001).
﹝ 17 ﹞ Hagen Llauk, Gunter Schmid, Wolfgang Radlik, Werner Weber, LisongZhou,Chris D. Sheraw, Jonathan A.Nichols, Thomas N.jackson;
“ Contact resistance in organic thin film transistors”; Solid-State Electronics 47 (2003) 297-301
﹝18 ﹞ Graciela B. Blanchet, C. R. Fincher, And Micheal Lefenfeld”Contact resistance in organic thin film transistors” Appl. Phys. Lett, Vol 84, no. 2, 2004
﹝19 ﹞ Giles Lloyd, Munira Raja, Ian Sellers, Naser Sedghi, Raffaella Di Lucrezia,Simon Higgins, Bill Eccleston; “The properties of MOS structures using conjugated polymers as the semiconductor” ; Microelectronic Engineering 59 (2001) 323-328
﹝20﹞ P. V. Necliudov, M. S. Shur, D. J. Gundlach, and T. N. Jackson, J. Appl.
Phys. 88, 6594~2000; D. J. Gundlach, L. Jia, and T. N. Jackson, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 22, 571~2001; P. V. Necliudov, M. S. Shur, D. J.
Gundlach, and T. N. Jackson, Solid-State Electron. 47, 259~2003; H. Kluak, G. Schmid, W. Radik, W. Weber, L. Zhou, C. Sheraw, J. A. Nichols, and T.
N. Jackson, ibid. 47, 297~2003.
﹝21﹞ I. Kymissis, C. D. Dimitrakopoulos, and S. Purushothaman, IEEE Trans.
Electron Devices 48, 1060~2001; C. D. Dimitrakopoulos and P. R. L.
Malenfant, Adv. Mater. ~Weinheim, Ger. 14, 99~2002
﹝22﹞ U. Geiser. Toward crystal design in organic conductors and superconductors.
In Proceedings of the 28th International School of Crystallography, Erice, Italy, May 1999.
﹝23﹞ G. Horowitz, R. Hajlaoui, and P. delannoy,“Temperature dependence of the field effect mobility of sexithiophene. Determination of the density of trap”,
J. Phys. III, France, vol. 5, no. 4 pp. 355-371, 1995
﹝24﹞ Lu, E. Delamarche, L. Eng, R. Bennewitz, E. Meyer, and H. J. Guntherodt,
“Kelvin probe force microscopy on surface: Investigation of the surface potential of self-assembled monolayers on gold,”Langmuir., vol. 15, pp.
8184-8188, 1999.
﹝ 25 ﹞ Kazumasa Nomoto, Nobukazu Hirai, Nobuhide Yoneya, Noriyuki Kawashima, Makoto Noda, Masaru Wada, Jiro Kasahara, IEEE Trans.
Electron Dev. 52 (2005) 1519
﹝26﹞ Qing Cao, Zheng-Tao Zhu, Maxime G. Lemaitre, Ming-Gang Xia, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 88 (2006) 113511.
﹝27﹞ Guangming Wang, Daniel Moses, Alan J. Heeger, Hong-Mei Zhang, Mux Narasimhan, R.E. Demaray, J. Appl. Phys. 95 (2004) 316.
﹝28﹞ Hsiao-Wen Zan, Kuo-Hsi Yen, Pu-Kuan Liu, Kuo-Hsin Ku, Chien-Hsun Chen, Jennchang Hwang Organic Electronics 8 (2007) 450–454.
﹝29﹞ Jin Y, Rang Z, Nathan M I, Newman C R and Frisbie C D 2004 Appl. Phys.
Lett. 85 4406.
﹝30﹞ Deman A L and Tardy J 2005 Org. Electron. 6 78.
﹝31﹞ Fritz S E, Kelley T W and Frisbie C D 2005 J. Phys. Chem. B 108 10574.
﹝32﹞ R. H. Tredgold, ”Order in Thin Organic Films” Cambridge University Press, 1994
﹝32﹞ A. Ulman, “An Introduction to Ultrathin Organic Films: From
Langmuir-Blodgett to Self-Assembly”, Academic press, New York,1991
﹝34﹞ R.F. Gould (Ed.), “Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion”, Proceeding of the 144th Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Vol.43, Washington,
DC, 1964
﹝35﹞ R.J. Good, “Contact angle wetting and adhesion: a critical review”, in:K.L.
Mimal (Ed.), Contact angle, Wettability and Adhesion, USP, The Netherlands, 1993, pp. 3–36.
﹝36﹞ Sang Chul Lim, Seong Hyun Kim, Jung Hun Lee, Mi Kyung Kim, Do Jin Kim, Taehyoung Zyung, Synthetic Metals 148 (2005) 75–79
﹝37﹞ D. Lu, Y. Wu, J. Guo, G. Lu, Y. Wang, J. Shen, Mater. Sci. Eng. B97 (2003) 141–144.
簡 歷
姓 名 : 徐明頤 性 別 : 男
出生日期 : 民國 73 年 04 月 26 日 出 生 地 : 台灣省新竹縣
住 址 : 新竹縣竹東鎮水之路 9 號 學 歷 : 私立上智天主教小學
(民國 79 年 09 月~民國 85 年 06 月) 竹東國中
(民國 85 年 09 月~民國 88 年 06 月) 國立新竹高級中學
(民國 88 年 09 月~民國 91 年 06 月) 國立中興大學物理學系
(民國 91 年 09 月~民國 95 年 06 月) 國立交通大學電子工程研究所碩士班 (民國 95 年 09 月~民國 97 年 07 月)
碩士論文 : 常壓式電漿系統沈積之二氧化矽在有機薄膜電晶體應上之研究 The study on the silicon dioxide deposited by
Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma Technology for Organic Thin-Film Transistor application