CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION
5.3 Research Limitation
國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
reconstruction in the policy implications. As can be seen, religion attains the most considerable freedom when the struggle on material life is resolved. The socialist policy on faiths and believes simply concluded as if the politic is not ‘healthy’ enough to confront the religious demand, policy makers have to take another path. In particular, indicating the liberty of conscience into the systematic management, using the label of different factors (such as economic, social welfare, cultural sentiment) to consolidate the political aim.
5.3 Research Limitation
The research delivered a synergy of the practical case to against the strictly critique of Marxism on religion; however, the fundamental detail of political ideology and motivation on sustaining the win-win situation rather than zero-sum strategy remains to acquire further analysis. The aspect relates to organization structure in Buddhism Association, either the legitimate or non-written functions offer a puzzle to discover in the future. The research is conducted in a time period, thus opportunities to approach diverse and multiple interviewees are restricted.
In the study, documents and books are selected subjectively to conduct the literature review, but the situation on historical bias is difficult to avoid. In other words, almost references are from Western scholars, written in English. The previous researches on Vietnam used the lens of foreigners that observing the different culture, society, religion and politic condition. In comparison, the thesis author is from the origin country. The generalized value on nationalism, religious freedom in a Communist country has been nourished, inherited from generation to generation. The cultural root, family, nationality background may contribute a different perspective in this research.
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
This Page is Innitially Left Blank
‧
1 Meyer, Hilbert. 2009. In M.Jorio&C. Sonderegger (Eds), Hítorisches Lẽikon Schweiz. Bern: HLS.
2Pao Ming. 1997. A Bomb in Beijing. Hong Kong: The Economsist.
3Bryant, C.G.A. 1994. A further comment on Kumar’s “civil society”, British Journal of Sociology, 45, 3, pp. 497–9
4 Casanova, Jose. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
5 Lunn, Jenny. 2009. The Role of Religion, Spirituality and Faith in Development: A critical theory approach. Third World Quarterly, 30(5), 937-951.
6 Aspinall, Edward. 2004. Indonesia: Transformation of Civil Society and Democratic Breakthrough. Civil Society and Political Change in Asia: Expanding and Contracting Democratic Space, M. Alagappa. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
7 Unger, Jonathan, and Chan.A. 1995. China, Corporatism, and the East Asian Model Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 33:29–53.
8Billings, D. B. (1994). Religion and Political Legitimation. Annual Review of Sociology, 20(1), 173-201
9 Ammerman NT. 1990. Baptist Battles: Social Change and Religious Conflict in the Southern Baptist Convention. New Brunswick: Rutgers University. Press
10 Herbert. D in Haynes, J. (2009). Routledge handbook of religion and politics.
London: Routledge.
11 Bruce, S. (2003) Politics and Religion, Cambridge:Polity.
12 Andre.L. 2001. Buddhist Organizations and Democracy in Taiwan. American Asian Review. Proquest Research Library pg.97
13 Tatsuru.A. 2013. The role of Buddhism in Social Work Vietnam and Japan. Social Work Institute Asian Center for Welfare in Society.
‧
14 Vu, Hien, Bailey, Stephen and Chen,James. Engaging Vietnam and Laos and Religious Freedom. The Review of Faith and International Affairs. UK: Taylor and Francis Groups, pp 86-92
15 Duiker, J Williams. 2000. Ho Chi Minh, A Life. NY: Hyperion.
16 State Records Management and Achieves III: Vietnamese Constitution. 2945-1946.
File no 97.
17 Gheddo. P. 1970. The Cross and the Bo-tree: Catholics and Buddhists in Vietnam.
Trans. Charles Quinn. New York: Sheed and Ward.
18 Jame S Olson & Randy Roberts. 1996. Where do the Dominos fell: America and Vietnam, 1945- 1990. NY: St Martin Press.
19 Michael E, Latham. 2006. Redirecting the revolution. Third World Quarterly, pp 27-41
20 Nguyen, Cong Luan. 2012. Nationalist in Vietnam Wars: Memoirs of a Victim Turned Soldier. Indiana University Press, p233
21 Fall, B Bernard. 1955. The Political-Religious Sects of Viet-Nam. Pacific Affairs, Vo.28, No.3, pp. 235-253
22 Ruth, Richard A. 2010. In Buddha’s Company: Thai soldiers in the Vietnam War.
University of Hawai’i Press, pp 181-212
23 Ruth, Richard A. 2010. In Buddha’s Company: Thai soldiers in the Vietnam War.
University of Hawai’i Press, pp 181-212
24 Tran, Q Le & Rambo, Terry and Garry D, Murfin. 1976. Why they Fled: Refugee Movement during the Spring 1975Communist Offensive in South Vietnam.
University of California Press.
Asian Survey, Vol. 16, No.9, pp 855-863
25 Bruce, Mathews. 1992. The Place of Religion in Vietnam Today. Buddhist-Christian studies, Vol.12, pp65-74
26 Marlaney, Shaun Kingsley. 2003. “Return to the Pass? The Dynamics of
Contemporary Religious and Ritual Transformation” in in Hy V Luong eds.,Post War in Vietnam. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
27 Zhang, XiaoMing. 2005. China’s 1979 War with Vietnam: A Reassessment. The China Quarterly, Vol. 1984, pp 851-874
28 Luong, V Hy. 2003. “Wealth, Power, and Inequality: Global Market, the State, and Local Sociocultural Dynamics”. in Hy V Luong eds., Post War in Vietnam.
Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
‧
29 Luong, V Hy. 2003. “Wealth, Power, and Inequality: Global Market, the State, and Local Sociocultural Dynamics”. in Hy V Luong eds., Post War in Vietnam.
Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
30 Taylor, Keith Weller. 1983. The Birth of Vietnam.
Berkerly: University of California Press.
31Olga, Dror. 2007. Cult, Culture and Authority: Princess Lieu Hanh in Vietnamese History. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
32 Thich Dao Tinh. Interview 2016. Taiwan: Dharma Mountain Sangha University.
33 Pham, Quynh Phuong. 2009. Hero and Deity. Chiang Mai: Mekong Press
34 Wells-Dang, Andrew. 2007. ‘ Foreign Religious organizations and Development in Vietnam’, cited in Philip Taylor, ‘ Modernity and Re-enchantment’. Singapore:
Institutes of South East Asia Studies
35 Teacher Zhang. Interview 2016. Ho Chi Minh city: The Yi-guan Dao Temple.
36 Martin, David. 2005. The relevance of European model of secularization in Latin America and Africa. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press
37 McHale, Shawn Federick. 2004. Print and Power, Confucianism, Communism and Buddhism in the making of modern Vietnam. Honolulu: University of Hawai’I Press.
38 Long, Darui. 2000. Humanistic Buddhism From Venerable Tai Xu to Grand Master Hsing Yun. His Lai Journal of Humanistic Buddhism. Volume 1, pp. 53-84
39 Tai Xu Dashi Quanshu (The Complete Works of Venerable Tai Xu), volume 34, pp. 597-598.
40 Taylor, Philip. ed.2007. Modernity and Re-enchantment: Religion in Post revolutionary Vietnam. Singapore: Institutes of South East Asia Studies
41 Norton, Barley. 2009. Songs for the Spirits: Music and Mediums in Modern Vietnam. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
42 Cadiere, Leopold. 1944. Religious and Practices of the Vietnamese. Melbourne:
Monash University
43 Chauvet Claire. 2011. Changing Spirit Identities: Rethinking the Four Palace’s Spirit representations in Northern Vietnam, in “Engaging the Spirit World” edited by Kristen W.Endres& Andrea Lauser
44 Laurel, Kendall. 1996. Korean Shamans and the Spirits of Capitalism. American Anthropologist, pp 512-27
45 Soucy, Alexander. 2013. The Buddha side: Gender, Power and Buddhist Practice in Vietnam. Honolulu: University of Hawai’I Press
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
46 Endres, Kristen W. & Lauser, Andrea. Contests of Commemoration: Virgin War Martyrs, State Memorials, and the Invocation of the Spirit World in Contemporary Vietnam. Britain: Berghahn Books
47 Olga, Dror. 2007. Cult, Culture and Authority: Princess Lieu Hanh in Vietnamese History. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
48 Nguyen, Ngoc Huy. 1998. ‘The Confucian Incursion into Vietnam’, in
Confucianism and the Family, eds. Walter H. Slote & George A. Devos. New York:
State University of New York Press
49 Woodside, Alexander. 1976. Community and Revolution in Modern Vietnam. New York: Houghton Mifflin
50 Wolters, Oliver. 1982. History, Culture and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives. Singapore: Institutes of South East Asia Studies
51 Andrade, D’ Roy. 2008. The study of Personal and Cultural Values, American, Japanese and Vietnamese. New York: Palgrave MacMillan
52 Nguyen, Thi Hien. 2006. ‘ A bit of a spirit favor is equal to a Load of Mudane Gifts’: Votive Paper Offerings of Len Dong Rituals in Post-renovation Vietnam,’ in Possesses by the Spirtis: Mediumship in the Contemporary Vietnamese Communities, eds K. Fjelstad ad T.H. Nguyen. Ithaca, NY: South East Asia Program, Cornell University
53 Soucy, Alexander. 2013. The Buddha side: Gender, Power and Buddhist Practice in Vietnam. Honolulu: University of Hawai’I Press
54 Hearn, Adrian H. 2008. Cuba: Religion, Social Capital, and Development. Durham:
Duke University Press
55 Crahan, Magaret E. 1985. Cuba: Religion and Revolutionary Institutionalization.
Journal of Latin American Studies. UK: Cambridge University Press.
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
Appendices
Appendix 1. The Vision of Synergy in different Historical Periods
Appendix 2. The Transformative Dialogue Structure in 1990
Appendix 3. National Administration system on Religious Affairs
Appendix 4- List of Religious Policies changed when the State Authority changed
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y