• 沒有找到結果。

6. Conclusions and Suggestions

6.2 Suggestions

Telecom industry provides the infrastructure for worldwide communications. Therefore, network to network connectivity, network coverage, network reliability and performance and service affordability are important criteria in establishing telecom networks. Because of the unique characteristics of the telecom network, it requires large capital investments and government licenses to conduct business and is, therefore, heavily influenced by government policy and regulation. Telecom deregulation is intended to introduce competition in the telecom carriers. However, without proper government guidance, telecom deregulation and policy (such as the European 3G license auction) could have a long-term negative impact on the local telecom industry. How to balance the forces between market demand and regulation is deemed a delicate issue. Furthermore, the speed and scope of telecom deregulation also impacts the survivability and sustainability of the telecom industry, particularly the carrier industry. A long-term sustainability phase approach for the telecom carrier industry coupled with a user centric strategy to balance supply and demand may be the best guideline for future telecom policy regulation. From a policy perspective, if a majority of the CLECs (Competitive Local Exchange Carriers) are unable to effectively compete with incumbent carriers, then a CLEC consolidation - leading to a well-controlled monopoly - could be a solid option for future local loop networks.

It is important to recognize the qualitative issues while managing emerging MAN and access technologies. Using the fuzzy MCDM method to quantify the qualitative issues while conducting a strategy evaluation is deemed an effective approach. This is may be of particular importance in managing emerging technologies in a complex business environment, since no deployment and proven benefits have been realized yet on these technologies. It is also found that in many cases, technology advantages are only one of the components in making a successful business. Other components, such as marketing and partnership strategies, as well as meeting user’s demands, are equally important in overall technology management. A system view is deemed necessary to manage and capture the trend of the emerging technologies.

References

王乃弘 (民 89 ), 民眾偏好醫院類型之研究 法之應用, 管理學報, 第十六卷第四期, 頁 661-681。

汪美香, 許溪南 (民 89 ), AHP 應用於外幣選擇權投資策略之研究 -- 以國際金融業務分 行(OBU)為例, 企業管理學報, 第四十六卷第二期頁 115 - 134。

黃興進, 張仁雄, 李幸秋, (民 90 ), 群體支援系統環境中層級分析法與任務型態對群決策 之影響, 中山管理學刊, 第九卷第二期, 頁 201 - 219。

Arthur W. B., Business 2.0, March 2002, Is the Information Revolution Dead?

Baker S., BusinessWeek Asia Edition, June 3, 2002, Tale of a Bubble, p46 –p52

Bellman, R.E., Zadeh, L.A., 1970. Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment. Management Science 17(4), 141-146.

Beranek L., 2000, Volume 2, The Massachusetts Historical Review, p56 -p72.

Buckley, J.J., 1985. Ranking Alternatives Using Fuzzy Numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 15(1), 21-31.

Business Online, May 2000, volume 1, issue 7, Cover Story, E-volution –Trading Hubs Take Off, p26 – p35.

Business Online, May 2000, volume 1, issue 7, ASPs – Controlling the Chaos, p18 – p20.

Chen, T.C.,1997. Fuzzy theory application in selecting management strategy. 1997 toward new management era conference, Ming-Chian University, 715-720.

Cheng, C.H., Mon, D.L., 1994. Evaluating Weapon System by Analytical Hierarchy Process Based on Fuzzy Scales. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 63, 1-10.

Cheng, J.Z., Tsyu, J.Z., Yu, H.C., 2003. Boom and gloom in the global telecommunications industry. Technology in Society 25(1), 65-81.

Cheng, J.Z., Chen, P-T, Yu, H-C D. 2003, Establishing a MAN access strategy for future broadband service ; a fuzzy MCDM analysis of SONET/SDH and Gigabit Ethernet, accepted by Technovation.

Cheng, J.Z., Yu, H-C, Sincoskie, W.D. 2003, Meeting the broadband access infrastructure demands: the promise of Gigabit Ethernet, accepted by Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

Christodoulou K. & Vlahos K. 2001, Implications of regulation for entry and investment in the local loop, Telecommunications Policy, 25, PP. 743-757.

Clark R., February, 2002, Caught in the loop, telecom Asia, PP. 18- 21.

Clavenna, S., Mary Jander and Marguerute Reardon, August 2001, Metro Optical Ethernet, Business Communications Review: S12-S16.

Economides, N., September, 1998, The Telecommunications Act of 1996 and its Impact, presented at the Annual Telecommunications Policy Conference, Tokyo, Japan, December 4, 1997. available at www.raven.stern.nyu.edu

Economides, N., Spring/Summer, 2001, Coming Together: The AT&T breakup (round three) and the remonopolization of telecommunications, STERNbusiness, PP. 39-41.

Economides, N., Lopomo, G., & Woroch, G., September, 1996, Regulatory Pricing Rulesto Neutralize Network Dominance, available at www.raven.stern.nyu.edu

Elstrom P. with Timmons H. in New York, BusinessWeek, April 23, 2001, Telecom Meltdown, p 100 – p 110.

Ferreira P., Lehr W., McKnight L., 2002, Optical networks and the future of broadband services, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69(2002) PP 741-758

Finneran M., August, 2001, Optical Switching: The What, How and Why, Business Communications Review PP S19-S23.

Foroohar R., Newsweek, May 28, 2001, The Other Bubble, p19 – p22.

Gabelmann A., 2001, Regulating European telecommunications markets: unbundled access to the local loop outside urban areas, Telecommunications Policy, 25, PP. 729-741.

GR-253, September, 2000, Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) Transport Systems:

Common Generic Criteria, Telcordia Technologies.

Henry D., BusinessWeek, February 19,2001, Deadweight on the Markets”, p84 –85.

Hu C-W, Keys for future network industry growth, Chinatimes Business Newspaper, June 29, 2001.

IEEE Standard 802.3AE-2002, IEEE Standard for Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications-Media Access Control (MAC) Parameters, Physical Layer, and Management Parameters for 10 Gb/s Operation

Information Technology - LAN/MAN - Part 3: Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) Access Method and Physical Layer, Specifications 2000 IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD (Ethernet) Standards.

Kerzner, H., 1989. A System Approach to Planning Scheduling and Controlling. Project Management, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 759-764.

Lawrence, G..R., Crump, C., U.S. Internet IP Traffic Growth, available at www.caspiannetworks.com

Lashinsky A, TheStreet.Com, June 22, 2001, Cisco’s Cash Cushion Keep It Riding High Lynch G. April, 2002, Has the competitive carrier model failed?, Telecom Asia, PP. 38.

Masini, E.B. and Vasquez, J.M. 2000, Scenarios as Seen from a Human and Social perspective, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 65(1), 49-66.

Metro Ethernet Networks – A Technical Overview, A Metro Ethernet Forum Whitepaper, www.metroethernetforum.org

Michalis M., 2001, “Local competition and the role of regulation: the EU debate and Britain’s experience”, Telecommunications Policy, 25, PP. 759-776.

Miller R. , Arndt M., Edwards C., Burrows P., Shinal J., Muller J., Zellner W., and bureau reports, February, 2001, Downturn in Fast-Forward. BusinessWeek.

NASA, PATTERN Relevance Guide (3 vols) 1965,. National Technical Information Service, U. S. Department of Commerce, Virginia.

NASA, PATTERN procedure manual. 1996, Honeywell Aero Report. National Technical Information Service, U. S. Department of Commerce, Virginia.

Perez, T. 1995, Some Comments on Satty’s AHP, Management Science, 41(8), 1091-1095.

Rohde L., February 2002, Study warns local loop unbundling failing in Europe, IDG News Service, available at www.pcworldmalta.com/news/2002/Feb

Rosenbush S., March, 2002, Broadband Policy: Did somebody say oligopoly?, BusinessWeek, PP. 40.

Rosenbush S. and Elstrom P., BusinessWeek, August 13, 2001, 8 Lessons from the Telecom Mess, p 60 – p 67.

Rosenbush S. in New York, with Shinal J. in San Mateo, Crockett R. in Chicago, Baker S. in Paris, and Kunii I. in Tokyo, BusinessWeek, February 19, 2001, Bad Loans Rattle Telecom Vendor, p85 – p86.

Saaty, T.L., 1977. A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(2), 234-281.

Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Seifert, R., A Complete Guide to LAN Switching Technology. JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.

Seifert R., A Complete Guide to LAN Switching Technology, JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.

Shinak J., BusinessWeek, February 26, 2001, Can Mike Volpi make Cisco Sizzle Again?

p102 – p104.

Tang, M.T., Tzeng, G..H., Wang S.W., 1999. A Hierarchy Fuzzy MCDM Method for Studying Electronic Marketing Strategies in the Information Service Industry. Journal of International Information Management 8(1), 1-22.

Telecommunications Industry Association, September, 2002, TIA White Paper: Fiber Optic Network Capacity and Utilization, Part II

Teng, J.Y., Tzeng, G.H., 1996, Fuzzy Multicriteria Ranking of Urban Transportation Investment Alternative. Transportation Planning and Technology 20(1), 15-31.

Tsaur, S.H., Tzeng, G..H., Wang, K.C., 1997. Evaluating Tourist Risks from Fuzzy Perspectives. Annals of Tourism Research 24(4), 796-812.

Tzeng, G.H., 1977. A study on the PATTERN Method for the Decision Process in the Public System, Japan Journal of Behaviormetrics 4 (2), 29-44.

Tzeng, G.H., Shiau, T.A., 1987. Energy Conservation Strategies in Urban Transportation:

Application of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making. Energy Systems and Policy, 11(1), 1-19.

Tzeng, G.H., Shian, T.A., Lin, C.Y., 1992. Application of Multicriteria Decision Making to the Evaluation of New Energy-System Development in Taiwan, Energy (An International Journal) 17(10), 983-992.

Tzeng, G.H., Teng, J.Y., 1994. Multicriteria Evaluation for Strategies of Improving and Controlling Air-Quality in the Super City: A Case of Taipei City, Journal of Environmental Management 40(3), 213-229.

Tzeng, G.H., Tsaur, S.H., 1993, Application of Multicriteria Decision Making to Old Vehicle Elimination in Taiwan, Energy and Environment 40 (3), 265-283.

www.techguide.com, Building 10 Gigabit/DWDM Metro Area Networks, The Technology Guide Series.

www.extremenetworks.com, Building New-generation Metropolitan Area Networks, Extreme Network.

www.appliancom.com, Ethernet, The key to new service revenues. Appian Communications.

www.wimaxforum.org, WiMAX Overview, Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access Forum

www.xilinx.com www.yipes.com www.onfiber.com

Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Information and Control. Fuzzy Sets, 8(3), 338-353.

Zadeh, L.A., 1975. The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning, Parts 1, 2, and 3. Information Science 8(2), 199-249, 8(3), 301-357; 9(1), 43-80.

Zahedi, F., 1986, Analytic hierarchy Process: A Survey of the Method and its Applications, Interfaces, 16(4), 96-108.

Zhau, R., Goving, R., 1991. Algebraic Characteristics of Extended Fuzzy Numbers, Information Science 54(1), 103-130.

Appendix - Questionnaire

Compatible With existing Network Equipment 設備成本的競爭優勢

填寫範例

敬請兩兩相比,勾選以下各考量項目之相對重要性比例。

以下為例 9:1 表目前「網路服務」相對於「網路設備成本」重要性最強;反之,1:9 表目前「網路運作系統」相對於「網路服務」重要性最強,下量表越靠左,表「網 路服務」相對越強。若置於中間(1:1)則表兩考量項目之重要性相等。

相對重要性比例(9 最大、1 最小)

9:1 8:1 7:1 6:1 5:1 4:1 3:1 2:1 1:1 1:2 1:3 1:4 1:5 1:6 1:7 1:8 1:9

網路服務 V 網路設備成本

網路服務 V 網路運作系統

問卷填寫開始

敬請兩兩相比,勾選以下各考量項目之相對重要性比例。

相對重要性比例(9 最大、1 最小)

9:1 8:1 7:1 6:1 5:1 4:1 3:1 2:1 1:1 1:2 1:3 1:4 1:5 1:6 1:7 1:8 1:9

網路服務 V 網路設備成本

網路服務 V 網路運作系統

網路設備成本 V 網路運作系統

針對「網路服務」下之第二層構面敬請兩兩相比,勾選以下各考量項目之相對重要 性比例。

相對重要性比例(9 最大、1 最小)

9:1 8:1 7:1 6:1 5:1 4:1 3:1 2:1 1:1 1:2 1:3 1:4 1:5 1:6 1:7 1:8 1:9

提供品質服務 V 可成長的頻寬

針對「網路設備成本」下之第二層構面敬請兩兩相比,勾選以下各考量項目之相對 重要性比例。

相對重要性比例(9 最大、1 最小)

9:1 8:1 7:1 6:1 5:1 4:1 3:1 2:1 1:1 1:2 1:3 1:4 1:5 1:6 1:7 1:8 1:9

與目前網路設備相容 V 設備成本的競爭優勢

與目前網路設備相容 V 簡易化的網路架構

設備成本的競爭優勢 V 簡易化的網路架構

針對「網路運作系統」下之第二層構面敬請兩兩相比,勾選以下各考量項目之相對 重要性比例。

相對重要性比例(9 最大、1 最小)

9:1 8:1 7:1 6:1 5:1 4:1 3:1 2:1 1:1 1:2 1:3 1:4 1:5 1:6 1:7 1:8 1:9

容易提供服務 V 低營運成本

容易提供服務 V 提供網路管理資訊

低營運成本 V 提供網路管理資訊

二、效用值設定

請給以下各種程度的效用區間一個評分,自 0 至 100 指示之低、中、高三個分 數。例如您可能認為「效用很大」低、中、高評分各為(85, 90, 100),但「效用大」

的低、中、高評分各為(70, 80, 90),其中低和高的分數可以重疊。

低 中 高

1.「效用很大」 80 90 100 2.「效用大」 60 70 80 3.「效用中」 40 50 60 4.「效用小」 20 30 40 5.「效用很小」 0 10 20

三、評估準則及都會區網路寬頻網路架構政策間之效用值勾選