• 沒有找到結果。

健身俱樂部私人教練課程之顧客參與動機與服務品質之研究

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "健身俱樂部私人教練課程之顧客參與動機與服務品質之研究"

Copied!
107
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)103. 6.

(2) 2014. 7. 600. 386. SPSS 20.0. 20-29 (. ii. ).

(3) A Study on Customers’ Participation Motivation and the Service Quality of Courses of Personal Trainers of Fitness Clubs July, 2014 Student: Lai Heng Jung Advisors: Shih, Chih-Pin Co-Advisors:Chen, Mei-Yen Abstract Course of personal trainers have been started since the foreign fitness industry came to Taiwan, which have also become another source of income for the fitness club. At present, every major fitness industry and even personal fitness studios in Taiwan teach such courses, providing customers with a professional personal fitness service. In view of this, this research discusses situations of customers of courses of personal trainers of fitness clubs and learns about the effects of different background variables on participation motivations and service quality so as to be used as reference for future planning and business patterns of related industries and personal trainers. It conducts a questionnaire survey and its content includes participation motivation scale, service quality scale and demographic variables. It studies customers participating in courses of personal trainers of Taipei’s 8 branches of World Gym Fitness Centers and conducts the survey through sampling, issuing 600 questionnaires with 386 effective ones returned. The collected data are processed with SPSS 20.0 and analyzed with descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA of independent samples, Scheffe's method and Pearson product-moment correlation analysis. The research results show that more women than men participate in such courses; most customers are aged between 20-29 and graduated from universities and colleges; married people without children are in the majority; most of their occupations fall under the category of Others; most of them have participated within one year; the courses were introduced to them mostly through their colleagues and relatives; they continued the courses because of the effects; there is a significant difference in the pressure, socializing and leisure of participation motivations for people with different educational backgrounds; there is a significant difference in the caring for the service quality for people iii.

(4) with different educational backgrounds; there is a significant relationship between the participation motivation and service quality. After organizing the analyses and discussions of the research, it makes the following suggestions: I. Measure the service of courses of personal trainers from the perspective of customers and learn about why customers participate in such courses so as to improve their motivation and participation willingness; II. Strengthen the professional quality of personal trainers, improve the quality of courses and maintain the quality of the external environment.. Keywords: Courses of Personal Trainers of Fitness Clubs; Participation Motivation; Service Quality. iv.

(5) v.

(6) ……………………………………………………………………….……............. .iii ....................................................................................................................................... iv ....................................................................................................................................... vi ..................................................................................................................................... viii ....................................................................................................................................... X. !!. !..................................................................................................................................................!1!. !!. !..................................................................................................................................................!4!. !!. !..................................................................................................................................................!5!. !!. !.............................................................................................................................................!5!. !!. !..................................................................................................................................................!6!. !!. !..................................................................................................................................................!7!. !!. !..................................................................................................................................................!7!. !!. !............................................................................................!9!. !!. !............................................................................................................!21!. !!. !............................................................................................................!29!. !!. !..............................................................................................!34!. !!. !...............................................................................................................................................!36!. vi.

(7) !!. !................................................................................................................................!38!. !!. !...............................................................................................................................................!40!. !!. !...............................................................................................................................................!41!. !. !.................................................................................................................................................!46!. !. !..................................................................................................................................!47!. !!. !..........................................................................!48!. !. !........................................................................!56!. !. !........................................................................!63!. !. !.....................................................................................................!69!. !. !...........................................................................................................................................................!73!. !!. !........................................................................................................................................................!75!. …………………………………………………………..………...94. vii.

(8) 2-1. …………………………………………...15. 2-2. (. 2-3. ………………………………………………………...26. 2-4 2-5. )…………………………..………...19. SERVQUAL PZB. 22. ……………31 SERVQUAL. ……………….………….32. 2-6. …………..……..…………...……………34. 3-1. ………………………………………………...…………………41. 3-2. ……………………………………………...……………43. 3-3. …………………………………………...……………43. 3-4. ………………………………………………...……………45. 3-5. …………………………………………………………...……………46. 4-1. ……………………………………….…..50. 4-2. t. ……..56. 4-3. ………...57. 4-4. ………………………………...58. 4-5. ………………………………...59. 4-6. …………………………...59. 4-7. t. 4-8. t. 4-9. ……………………..60 ………………………..64. ……………………………………...65. 4-10. ………………………...66. 4-11. ………………………………...67. 4-12. ………………...67. viii.

(9) 4-13. t. ……………..68. 4-14. ……...70. 4-15. …...71. ix.

(10) 2-1.. …………………………………………………………...……….…22. 2-2.. …………………………………………………………25. 2-3.. ……………………………….………………..…….33. 3-1.. …………………………………………………………………….…...38. 3-2.. ………………………………………………………………………....39. 3-3.. ……………………………………………………………….…...42. x.

(11) !!. !. !!. ! (GDP) (. (. 2013). 2009). (. 2011). ( 2012). (. 2012). (. 2012). ( 2000) 1.

(12) (. 2007). (. 2002) (. 2001). (. 2006). Watermeyer (2012). ( 2006). (2008). (. 2005). ( Hultquist, Church,. Fisher (2010). 24 54. 2. 2006). Madeson,.

(13) Koivula (1999). (Briggs, 1994; Jakicic, Markus, Gallagher, Napolitano, & Lang, 2004; Wankel, 1993). (Oman & King , 2000). Pahl (2003). (. ) (Madeson, Hultquist,. Church, & Fisher, 2010). (2009). (2013). 3.

(14) (2011). (2012). (2009). !!. !. 4.

(15) !!. !. !!. !. ( 2006). (. 2008). (. (. 2003 2006. 2004 2008. 2012). 5. 2004. 2012). 2006.

(16) 2000. (. 2008). Crompton Mckay (1997). (2007). !!. !. 6.

(17) 101. 2013. 1. 2014. 1. 2014. 6. 12 5. !!. !. 8. 8. !. !!. 7.

(18) (Zoumbaris 2012). movere (. 1991). (Parasuraman, Zeithaml, & Berry, 1985). 8.

(19) !!. !. !!. !. ( 2000). Zoumbaris (2012). (George, 2008) 1930. Scott (1996). 1930. Weiders Weiders 1930 1936 Jack Lalanne Jack Lalanne. Henry Gray 9.

(20) (cable pulley machine). (leg extension) (Watermeyer,. 2012 ). Scott (1996). 1950. 1980. 2000. ( 2000 90. (. 2006). 2000. 10. 2006).

(21) (. 2006). (2006). 2000. (. 2005) SPA (. 2006). (. ). 2004. 2003. 2012 (. 2013) 2000 2001 28. 2006. 2008. Fitness. 11. True.

(22) (. 2005). (. 2008). ( (. ). (. 2002). ). (2008) FISAF TAIWAN (2007). (. ). 12.

(23) (. 2010). (2012). (2004). (Zoumbaris, 2012). Aerobics and Fitness. Association of America (AFAA). Asian Academy for Sports & Fitness. Professionals (AASFP). Federation of International Sport. Aerobics and Fitness (FISAF). International Health and. Fitness Institute (IHFI). (2005). (. 2005). True Fitness 13.

(24) (. (. 2005). 2006) (2005). (2000) (1996). (2005). Malek 1999. (2002). 15,372 2002. 62,000 14.

(25) (Malek, 2002) 1954. (Watermeyer, 2012). 2-1 2-2 2-1. (. ) 1.. (2003). 2.. 3.. (2004). (. 15. ).

(26) 2-1 ( (. ). ) 1.. (2004) 2.. 1. (2004) 2.. 3.. 4.. 1. 2.. (2005). 1. (2006) 3.. ( 16. ).

(27) 2-1 ( (. ). ) 1.. (2006). 2.. 1. (2007). 2. (2008). ( 1. ). 2.. 1. (2009) 2.. 17. 31-40.

(28) 2-1 ( (. ). ). (2012). 12. 3. 11. 69. 1. (2012) 2.. —. 3.. Club. 1.. Gavin (1996). 2. 3. 4. 5.. Malek. 1.. (2002) 2. (. 18. ).

(29) 2-1 (. ). ( ) McClaran (2003) 1.. ─. 2.. ─. 3.. ─. 4.. ─. 5.. ─. 2-2 ( ( ) Gaylene. ). 10. 1.. S. W. (2008). REPS 2.. 3.. 4.. Madeson. 8. (2010) 24. 54 ( 19. ).

(30) 2-2 ( (. )(. ). ). Watermeyer. 1.. 1.. (2012). 9 3. 3 3 2.. 2.. 9 9. (Watermeyer, 2012) (. 2005. (Gavin, 1996). 20. 2012).

(31) !. !!. (Engel, Blackwell, & Miniard, 2001). Kotler (2000). 2-1.. (. 2000). 21.

(32) 2-1. (2003). (. movere. (. 1991) Maslow (1970). Maslow. (2000) 22. 13).

(33) (1994). Kenyon (1968). Beard. Raghed. 1983 (. Cash, Novy. Crant (1994). 101. 23. 2011).

(34) Cash, Novy Cash. /. Crant (1994). (2005). (1994). /. /. /. (2005) 2-2.. Murray (1938). 24. 19.

(35) 2-2. (2005). 25.

(36) 2-3 2-3. 1991 2002 2005 2005 2005. 205 400 48.23. 2006 2007 2008 2008. 2008 2008 2009 2009 2009 2010 ( 26. ).

(37) 2-3 (. ). 2012 Markland & Hardy. 1993. Cash, Novy & Crant. 1994. 101. ”. (2011) (. ). ”. (2005) /. /. /. /. (2006) 35 76.8%. (2006) 45 27.

(38) (2007). (2008). (2010). (2011). 28.

(39) (2011). !!. !. (Taylor & Baker, 1994). 80. Parasuraman, Zeithaml. Kotler (1994). Berry (1988). (service). (2009). (American Marketing Association, AMA) 29.

(40) Kotler, Leong, Ang,. Bitner. Tan (1996). Hubbert (1994). (Cronin & Taylor, 1992). Parasuraman SERVQUAL. 22. (. (. (1985). 2009). 30. 2009).

(41) Parasuraman, Zeithaml,. (PZB Parasuraman, Zeithaml. Berry (1985). ). PZB. Berry 12 1988. Parasuraman. SERVQUAL SERVQUAL. 2-4. SERVQUAL. 22. 2-5. 2-4 SERVQUAL 1985 PZB. 1988. PZB. 1.. 1.. (19%). 2.. 2.. (32%). 3. 4.. 3.. (22%). 5. 6. 7. 8.. 4.. (19%). 9.. 5.. (16%). (. ). 10. ”. (2009) (. ). 31.

(42) 2-5 PZB 1.. 22. SERVQUAL. 1. 2. 3. 4.. 2.. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.. 3.. 10. 11. 12. 13.. 4.. 14. 15. 16. 17.. 5.. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. ”. (2009). (. ). 32.

(43) 1991 Parasuraman, Zeithhaml,. Berry. SERVQUAL. 2009 Parasuraman. (1993) (desired service) (adequate service). (zone of. tolerance) 2-3-2. ( 22. 2002). 1993. Parasuraman. 1991. 21. 2-3. (2002). (. ). (. 2009) Parasuraman, Zeithhaml. Berry (1994). SERVQUAL 33.

(44) Cronins Taylor (1992). (2009). !!. !. (2011). (2010). 2-6 2-6. (2005) (. 34. ).

(45) 2-6 (. ). (2005) (2009). (2010). (2012). (2012) ─. (2013). Lee (2009). An investigation of predictors of satisfaction and future intention: Links to motivation, involvement, and service quality in a local festival. 35.

(46) !!. !. 2000. (2005). /. /. /. (Taylor & Baker, 1994). (. 2011). 36. /.

(47) ( (1985) PZB. 2009). Parasuraman, Zeithhaml (2009). 37. Berry.

(48) !. !!. !!. !. 3-1.. 3-2.. 3-1. t. Pearson. t. 3-1. 38.

(49) IBM SPSS 20.0. 3-2. 3-2. 39.

(50) !!. !. 8. 8. 8 (2009) ±5%. 95% 384. 600. n= Z = Z (95%. ). p= d=. ( (. 0.5) ±5%). 8. 75. 40.

(51) 600 3-1 3-1. -. 75. -. 75. -. 75. -101. 75. -. 75. -. 75. -. 75. -. 75 600. !!. !. (2005) Parasuraman (1994) (2009). 3-3. 41. SERVQUAL.

(52) 3-3.. 19 21. 9 (5). (2). (4). (3). (1). (2005) /. /. /. 3-2. 42. /.

(53) 3-2. 1. 2. 3. 4.. (. ). 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. /. 17. 18. 19.. Parasuraman, Zeithhaml,. Berry (1994) SERVQUAL. (2009) 3-3 3-3. 1. 2. 3. 4. ( 43. ).

(54) 3-3 (. ) 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21.. (. 2000). (. 44. 2011).

(55) 27%. t. 0.3 2006). CR. 3.00. (. 3-4. 3-4 Cronbach’s α 1.2.3.4.5.6. 6. .846. 7.8.9.10. 4. .699. 11.12.13.14.15. 5. .88. 16.17.18.19. 4. .935. 1.2.3.4. 4. .795. 5.6.7.8. 4. .829. 9.10.11.12. 4. .865. 13.14.15.16.17. 5. .88. 18.19.20.21. 4. .875. 45.

(56) (. 2011). 3-4 3-5. !. 2014. 4. 1. 4. !. 19. 46.

(57) !. ! IBM SPSS 20.0. (descriptive statistics). t. (independent t-test) t. (one-way ANOVA). (Scheffe’s Post Hoc Comparison) (p. (Pearson correlation analysis). Pearson. 47. <.05).

(58) !. ! 600. 386. SPSS 22.0 for Mac. !!. !. 4-1. 30.6%. 74.7%. 40-49. 195. 50.5%. 20-29. 30-39. 14.8%. 50-59. 191. 44% 5.2% 60. 66.3% 22%. (. ). 11.7%. (. ). 49.5%. 1.8%. (. ). 0%. 65.8%. 34.2%. 71.8% 48. 28.2%.

(59) ( 15.8%. ). 15 % 9.1%. 16.3%. 14.2%. 8.3%. /. / 7.3%. 45.9% 9.8%. 6.7%. 10.1%. 25.9%. 3.9% 1.6%. 3.9%. 2.3% 0.8%. 25.9% 22.8% 13.7%. 18.7%. 14.8%. 4.1%. 27.2% 15.8%. 11.4%. 23.3% 9.6%. 3.6%. 49. 9.1%.

(60) 4-1 (n=386) (. ). 191. 49.5. 195. 50.5. 14. 3.6. 20-29. 170. 44.0. 30-39. 118. 30.6. 40-49. 57. 14.8. 50-59. 20. 5.2. 7. 1.8. 45. 11.7. 256. 66.3. 85. 22. 254. 65.8. 132. 34.2. 109. 28.2. 277. 71.8. 61. 15.8. 39. 10.1. 32. 8.3. 58. 15. 35. 9.1. 15. 3.9. 28. 7.3. 55. 14.2. 63. 16.3. 19. 60 ( (. ) ). /. / (. ). (. 50. ).

(61) 4-1 (n=386) (. ) (. 20-29. 30-39. 51. ). 177. 45.9. 100. 25.9. 38. 9.8. 26. 6.7. 15. 3.9. 6. 1.6. 6. 1.6. 6. 1.6. 3. 0.8. 9. 2.3. 100. 25.9. 57. 14.8. 72. 18.7. 88. 22.8. 53. 13.7. 16. 4.1. 105. 27.2. 61. 15.8. 44. 11.4. 37. 9.6. 90. 23.3. 35. 9.1. 14. 3.6.

(62) (2009). (2008). (2005). (1991). 20-29 30-39. 30.6%. (2009). 44% 74.6%. (2008) (. 2008. 2010. 2006) (2011). 52.

(63) 256 66.3%. (. 2008. ( 2014). 2005). 2009. 2008. 2008. (2007) (2013). 65.8% (2005) (. (2008). 2007. 2001. (. 71.8%. Madrigal, Havitz. 1997). 2009). Howard (1992) (2010) Becker (1965) 53.

(64) (2010). ( ) (. 2000 2009). 2005. 2007. 2001. 2003. (2010) (2011) (2006). (. U. ) (. 2012). 16. 16. 45.9% 18 54. (2009).

(65) 25.9% 22.8%. (2009) 32.8%. 27.2% (2009). 55.

(66) !. !. t t-test). (independent. (p<.05) (Scheffe's Post Hoc Comparison). t 4-2 (p>.05). 4-2. 4-2 t. (n=386) t. 191. 4.30. .56. 196. 4.31. .57. 191. 4.21. .60. 196. 4.30. .58. 191. 3.88. .79. 196. 3.85. .73. 191. 3.20. 1.02. 196. 3.28. 1.04. 56. p .21. .96. -1.49. .93. .35. .91. .78. .93.

(67) 70. (. ). 60. 4-3. 4-4. 4- 3 (n=386) 10-19. 14. 4.42. .45. 20-29. 170. 4.27. .55. 30-39. 118. 4.29. .55. 40-49. 57. 4.33. .52. 50-59. 20. 4.40. .81. 7. 4.67. .33. 19. 14. 4.23. .70. 20-29. 170. 4.30. .53. 30-39. 118. 4.22. .60. 40-49. 57. 4.29. .62. 50-59. 20. 4.02. .76. 7. 4.14. .54. 19. 14. 4.04. .63. 20-29. 170. 3.83. .75. 30-39. 118. 3.80. .79. 40-49. 57. 3.95. .75. 50-59. 20. 4.03. .81. 7. 3.82. .73. 19. 14. 3.46. 1.18. 20-29. 170. 3.27. 1.00. 30-39. 118. 3.19. 1.02. 40-49. 57. 3.32. 1.13. 50-59. 20. 2.78. 0.89. 7. 3.10. 1.14. 60. 60. 60. 60. 57.

(68) 4-4 F 1.63. 5. .33. 119.43. 380. .31. 121.06. 385. .52. 5. .33. 133.70. 380. .35. 134.23. 385. 5.08. 5. .40. 218.83. 380. .58. 223.92. 385. 12.52. 5. 1.21. 400.33. 380. 1.07. 412.85. 385. 1.04. .96. .69. 1.13. 4-5. 4-6 Brown-Forsythe. (p<.05) (. ). (Scheffe) (. ) (. ( ). 58. ).

(69) 4-5 (n=386). ( (. ) ). ( (. ) ). ( (. ) ). ( (. ) ). 45. 4.27. .52. 256. 4.33. .55. 85. 4.25. .60. 45. 4.28. .51. 256. 4.28. .60. 85. 4.19. .61. 45. 4.13. .52. 256. 3.86. .78. 85. 3.72. .77. 45. 3.66. .90. 256. 3.24. 1.03. 85. 3.00. 1.05. 4-6 F. *p < .05. A. (. ). .53. 2. .27. 120.52. 383. .32. 121.05. 385. .52. 2. .26. 133.70. 383. .35. 134.23. 385. 5.08. 2. 2.54. 218.83. 383. .57. 223.92. 385. 12.52. 2. 6.26. 400.33. 383. 1.05. 412.85. 385. B. C. 59. (. ). .85. .76. 5.58* A>C 5.99*. A>B A>C.

(70) t 4-7 (p>.05). 4-7. 4-7 t. (n=386) t. 255. 4.30. .55. 132. 4.31. .58. 255. 4.26. .60. 132. 4.26. .58. 255. 3.80. .77. 132. 3.97. .73. 255. 3.17. 1.02. 132. 3.38. 1.06. p -.19. .37. -0.3. .63. -2.06. .34. -1.89. .39. ( 2008. 2007. 2010). 60.

(71) (. 2010. 2012. 2007. 2002) Leary, Wheeler,. Jenkins. (1986) (2005). (. 2012. 2010. 2010). ( (. ). (. ). ) (. (2005) (2006). (2007). 61. ).

(72) (. ). (2009). (2006). (. ) ( (. ). ). (2007) (2011) (2010). 62.

(73) !. !. t t-test). (independent. (one-way ANOVA) (scheffe). (. ) t 4-8 (p>.05). 4-8. 4-8 t. (n=386) t. 191. 3.92. .68. 196. 3.97. .61. 191. 4.28. .59. 196. 4.31. .60. 191. 4.26. .66. 196. 4.39. .60. 63. p .73. .17. -.50. .59. -2.03. .34.

(74) 4-8 t. (n=386) (. ) t. (. 191. 4.34. .61. 196. 4.48. .60. 191. 4.31. .68. 196. 4.44. .62. p. -2.23. .50. -1.88. .08. ). 60. ) 70. (. 4-9 4-10. (p>.05) (p<.05). (Scheffe). 4-9 (n=386) 10-19. 14. 4.11. .61. 20-29. 170. 3.97. .63. 30-39. 118. 3.93. .66. 40-49. 57. 4.04. .58. 50-59. 20. 3.49. .78. 7. 3.89. .52. 10-19. 14. 4.29. .76. 20-29. 170. 4.23. .61. 30-39. 118. 4.31. .56. 40-49. 57. 4.40. .50. 50-59. 20. 4.39. .73. 7. 4.61. .38. 60. 60. 64.

(75) 4-9 (n=386) (. ). 10-19. 14. 4.38. .77. 20-29. 170. 4.23. .65. 30-39. 118. 4.37. .58. 40-49. 57. 4.41. .62. 50-59. 20. 4.56. .72. 7. 4.75. .38. 10-19. 14. 4.33. .77. 20-29. 170. 4.31. .64. 30-39. 118. 4.45. .57. 40-49. 57. 4.54. .53. 50-59. 20. 4.62. .60. 7. 4.89. .30. 10-19. 14. 4.13. .84. 20-29. 170. 4.31. .69. 30-39. 118. 4.38. .60. 40-49. 57. 4.50. .54. 50-59. 20. 4.64. .63. 7. 4.71. .44. 60. 60. 60 4-10. (n=386) F 5.24. 5. 1.05. 153.92. 380. .41. 159.16. 385. 2.39. 5. .48. 131.19. 380. .35. 133.58. 385. 4.51. 5. .90. 151.17. 380. .40. 155.68. 385. 65. 2.59*. 1.39. 2.27*.

(76) 4-10 (n=386) (. ) F. 5.26. 5. 1.05. 138.951. 380. .37. 144.22. 385. 4.69. 5. .94. 156.84. 380. .41. 161.53. 385. 2.88*. 2.27*. 4-11. 4-12 (p<.05) (Scheffe). ( (. ). ). 4-11 (n=386) ( (. ) ). ( (. ) ). ( (. ) ). 66. 45. 3.96. .71. 256. 3.95. .64. 85. 3.95. .61. 45. 4.23. .59. 256. 4.30. .60. 85. 4.31. .56. 45. 4.11. .69. 256. 4.36. .62. 85. 4.38. .64.

(77) 4-11 (n=386) ( ( (. ) ). ( (. ) ). ( (. ) ). ( (. ) ). ). 45. 4.24. .57. 256. 4.45. .59. 85. 4.40. .68. 45. 4.10. .71. 256. 4.41. .63. 85. 4.40. .64. 45. 4.24. .57. 256. 4.45. .59. 85. 4.40. .68. 45. 4.10. .71. 256. 4.41. .63. 85. 4.40. .64. 4-12 (n=386) F. *p < .05. A. (. ). .00. 2. .00. 159.16. 383. .42. 159.16. 385. .20. 2. .10. 133.38. 383. .35. 133.58. 385. 2.64. 2. 1.32. 153.04. 383. .40. 155.68. 385. 1.55. 2. .78. 142.66. 383. .37. 144.22. 385. 3.96. 2. 1.98. 157.57. 383. .41. 161.53. 385. B. C. 67. (. ). .01. .29. 3.30*. 2.08. 4.81*. B>A C>A.

(78) t 4-13 4-13. 4-13 t. (n=386) t. 255. 3.92. .66. 132. 3.99. .61. 255. 4.29. .61. 132. 4.30. .55. 255. 4.32. .64. 132. 4.34. .63. 255. 4.39. .64. 132. 4.45. .56. 255. 4.35. .68. 132. 4.41. .59. 68. p -1.00. .46. -.11. .16. -.21. .89. -.96. .40. -.86. .13.

(79) (2004). (2005). (2010). (2004) (2010). (2008). (. ). (. ). !. ! ( ). (. ). 69.

(80) 4-14. 4-15. 4-14 M. SD. 1. 1.. 75.10. 9.63. 2.. 89.87. 10.93. 2. .296*. *p < .05 4-15 M. SD. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1.. 4.30. .56. 2.. 4.26. .59. .41*. 3.. 3.86. .76. .44*. .24*. 4.. 3.24. 1.04. .09. .16*. .52*. 5.. 3.95. .64. .28*. .30*. .20*. .20*. 6.. 4.30. .59. .52*. .36*. .22*. -.03. .45*. 7.. 4.33. .64. .42*. .30*. .13*. -.18*. .32*. .77*. 8.. 4.41. .61. .40*. .27*. .12*. -.16*. .34*. .73*. .82*. 9.. 4.37. .65. .42*. .30*. .10*. -.17*. .37*. .71*. .79*. .85*. *p < .05 4-14 (. 2004. 2005. 2010. 2012. 2012). 4-15. .52. 70. .42. .40. .42. 9.

(81) .28 .20. -.18 -.16 -.17. 71.

(82) 72.

(83) !. !!. !. 20-39. 73. !.

(84) ( (. ). ) (. ) (. (. ). ). (. 74. ).

(85) !!. 75. !.

(86) (Total Body Resistance Exercise, TRX) VIPR (Vitality. Performance. Reconditioning). (BOSU). (Kickboxing) NTC (Nike. Training Club). 76.

(87) 77.

(88) !. (2002). (2006). 26. 307-314. (2013) http://news.cnyes.com/Content/20130507/KH7UBGEGKY5E7.shtml. (2010). (. ). (2011). — (. ). (2004) (. ). (2012) 11. 198-213. (2000). 99. (2004). 78. 2010.

(89) (2005). (. ). (2002). (. ). (2009). ( ). (2004). (. ). (2006) 1(2). 65-89. (2010). ( ). (2004). 73. 126-132. (2001). (. (2005) (. ). ). 79.

(90) (2005) 1(2). 55-64. (2006). 11. (2008). 23-34. ─ 83. 59-94. (2007). (. ). (2010). 9. 1-13. (2010). 99. (2012) (. ). (2013). (. ). 16. 209-225. (2013). 21. (2004). 25-52 (. ). (2007) 40-56. 80.

(91) (2009). SPSS. (2011). (. ). (2005) (. ). (2005) (. ). (2008). (. ) (2009) (2006) 87. 163-169. (2000). 2000. 108-114 (2009). 5. 8. 636. (2011) WTO. 259. (2009) (. ). 81. 36-39.

(92) (2013) (. ) (2009) (2008). ( ). (2005). 7(1). 117-129. (2005) 16(1). 185-198. (2008). 99. 163-171. (2011) 5. 119-135. (2003). ( ). (2000). (. (2005). ). 145 76-82. (2003). 82.

(93) (2008) (. ). (2012). ( ). (2010) 41(1). 27-48. (2012) (. ). (2006). (. (2010). ). :SPSS (PASW). :. (2011) (2008) (. (2008). ). ─. 2008. 182-189. (2010). 2010 165-185. (2005). (. ) 83.

(94) (2013). 95-98. http://sports.bestmotion.com/Page/News2.aspx (2000) (2005). (2009). 45(2). IPod. 29-37. (2010) 48. 79-96. (1991) (1997). 94. (2002). 8-11. (. ). (2006) (. ). (2006) (. ). (2010). (. ). (2010). (. 84. ).

(95) (2001) (1991). (. (2004). ). 2004 , 598-605. (2008). (2003). (. ). (2008) (. ). (2010). (. (2000). ). BabyBoss City (. ). (2009) -. (. ). (2006). (. ). 85.

(96) (2009). 12. (2012). (. (2010). ). (. ). (2002). Life Coaching ─. (2008) 12 632-651. (2003). (. (1991). (. (2005). (. ). ). ). (2002). (. ) (2006). 11 35-44. 86.

(97) (2007) (. ). (2007). — 2007. (2009). 2008 (. ). (2009). (. ). (2012). TTR. (2002). (. ). (2005) 29(4). 36-39. (2012) 11. 94-103. (2006). 86. (2000) (. ─ ). 87. 122-126.

(98) (2009). ( ). (2000) (. ). (2005) (. ). (2006) (RTS International). (. ). (2007) 18(4). 1-14 (2006). 82. 141-146. (2013) 1. 23-34 (2005) (. ) (2002). (Weinberg, R. S., & Gould, D. ,1995). (2011) 14 88.

(99) (2011). ( ). (1996). 10(3). (2004). 8-17 -. (. ). (2012). World Gym. (2004) 89-96 (2007) 1(3). 18-27. (2009). ( ). (2009) (. ). (2011) (. ). (2011) (. ) (2007) 89.

(100) (2005). (. ). (2009). http://www.pollster.com.tw. Becker, G. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75, 493-517. Bitner, M. J., and Hubbert, A. R. (1994). Encounter Satisfaction Versus Overall Satisfaction Versus Quality. In R. T. Rust and R. L. Oliver (Eds.), Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice (pp. 289). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc Briggs, J. (1994). An investigation of participant enjoyment in the physical activity instructional setting. Physical Educator, 51, 213-221. Cash, T. F., Novy, P.L. & Grant, J.R. (1994). Why do women exercise? Factor analysis and further validation of the reasons for exercise inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 539–544. Cronin, J. Joseph Jr., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality:A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68. Crompton L. J., & Mckay L. S. (1997). Motives of visitors attending festival events. Annals of Tourism research, 24(2), 425-439. Ebel, R. L. (1979). Essentials of Educational Measurement (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer behavior. New York, NY: Dryden Press. Gavin, J. (1996). Personal trainers' perceptions of role responsibilities, conflicts, and boundaries. Ethics & Behavior, 6(1), 55-69. George, M. (2008). Interactions in expert service work: Demonstrating professionalism in personal training. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37(1), 108 - 131. 90.

(101) Gaylene, S. W. (2008). Personal trainers: motivating and moderating client exercise behavior. The University of Waikato, New Zealand.. Jakicic, J., Markus, B., Gallagher, K. Napolitano, M., & Lang, W. (2004). Effect of exercise duration and intensity on weight loss in overweight, sedentary women: A randomized trial. ACC Curr. J. Rev., 13(1), 21-22.. Kenyon, C. S. (1968). A conceptual model for characterizing physical activity. Research Quarterly, 39, 96-105.. Kotler, P., Leong, S. M., Ang, S. H., & Tan, C. T. (1996). Marketing management: An Asian perspective. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.. Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing management. New Jersey, NJ : The Millennium Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc.. Koivula, N. (1999). Sport participation: Differences in motivation and actual participation due to gender typing. J Sport Behav, 22, 360-380.. Kotler, P. (1994). Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation, and control. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice-Hall.. Lee, J., & Beeler, C. (2009). An investigation of predictors of satisfaction and future intention: Links to motivation, involvement, and service quality in a local festival. Event Management, 13(1), 17-29. Madrigal, R., Havitz, M. E., & Howard, D. R. (1992). Married couples’ involvement with family vacations. Leisure Sciences, 14, 287-301.. 91.

(102) McClaran, S. R. (2003). The effectiveness of personal training on changing attitudes towards physical activity. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2(1), 10-14.. Murray, H.A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.. Malek, M., Nalbone,D., Berger, D., & Coburn, J. (2002). Importance of health science education for personal fitness trainers. J. Strength Cond. Res. 16(1), 19–24.. Markland, D., & Hardy, D. (1993). The exercise motivations inventory: Preliminary development and validity of a measure of individuals' reasons for participation in regular physical exercise. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(3), 289-296.. Madeson, N. M., Hultquist, N. C., Church, A., & Fisher, A. L. (2010). A Phenomenological Investigation of Women’s Experiences With Personal Taining. Hardin Simmons University, Texas USA.. Oman, R., & King, A. (2000). The effect of life events and exercise program format on the adoption and maintenance of exercise behavior. Health Psychol, 19, 605-612.. Pahl R. (2003). Some skeptical comments on the relationship between social support and well- being. Leisure Studies, 22, 357-368.. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1994). Ressessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: Implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 58, 111-124.. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 41- 50. 92.

(103) Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perception of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 12-40.. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1991). Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 69, 140-147.. Scott, R. (1996). The business of personal training. Human Kinetics, 4-9.. Taylor, S. A., & Baker, T. L. (1994). An assessment of the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in the formation of consumers' purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 70, 163-178.. Watermeyer, A. J. (2012). Thinking on their feet: the role of knowledge in the work of personal training. university of the witwatersrand.. Wankel, L. (1993). The importance of enjoyment to adherence and psychological benefits from physical activity. Int J Sport Psychol, 24(2), 151-169.. Williams, P., & Davis, D. C. (2002). Therapist as life coach: Transforming your practice (1st cd.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company Ltd. Zoumbaris K. S. (2012). Encyclopedia of wellness: From acai berry to yo-yo dieting. ABC-CLIO LLC.. 93.

(104) banai13@gmail.com. …. 1.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 2.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 3.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 4.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 5.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 6.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 7.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 94.

(105) … 8.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 9.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 10.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 11.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 12.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 13.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 14.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 15.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 16.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 17.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 18.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 19.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 1.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 2.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 3.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 95.

(106) 4.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 5.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 6.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 7.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 8.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 9.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 10.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 11.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 12.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 13.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 14.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 15.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 16.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 17.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 18.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 19.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 20.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 21.. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 96.

(107) ! ". 1.. ". 1. 2. 2.. __________. 3. " #. 1 4. ". ". 1. ". 1. ". 1. ". 2. ". 4. ". 5. ". 8. ". 2. 3. 4. ". 2. 5. ". 2. 6.. " 7. /. /. ". 9. ". 3. ". 6. ______________. 7. " " " ". 1 4 7 10. ". 1. ". 4. " " ". " " ". 2 5 8. 3 6 9. 8. " ". 2 5. 9.. ". 3. ". 6. ( ". 1. ". 4. " ". ". 2 ". 5. 97. 6. ). 3 ". 7.

(108)

參考文獻

相關文件

Define instead the imaginary.. potential, magnetic field, lattice…) Dirac-BdG Hamiltonian:. with small, and matrix

incapable to extract any quantities from QCD, nor to tackle the most interesting physics, namely, the spontaneously chiral symmetry breaking and the color confinement.. 

Basing on the observation and assessment results, this study analyzes and discusses the effects and problems of learning the polynomial derivatives on different level students

Microphone and 600 ohm line conduits shall be mechanically and electrically connected to receptacle boxes and electrically grounded to the audio system ground point.. Lines in

™ ™ When ready to eat a bite of your bread, place the spoon on the When ready to eat a bite of your bread, place the spoon on the under plate, then use the same hand to take the

This research sets different backgrounds as variables of consumers of Miaoli County residents and whether their different life styles and corporate social

The main goal of this research is to identify the characteristics of hyperkalemia ECG by studying the effects of potassium concentrations in blood on the

In order to analyze the tourists’ multi-phase recreation experience of railway tourism, this research discusses the dimensions, including customers’ involvement, perceived