Contents lists available atScienceDirect
Materials Chemistry and Physics
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / m a t c h e m p h y sA study of ultraviolet-curable organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites and their
encapsulating applications for organic light-emitting diodes
Ming-Hua Chang
a, Tsung-Eong Hsieh
a,∗, Bohr-Ran Huang
b, Huai-En Hsieh
b, Fuh-Shyang Juang
c,
Yu-Sheng Tsai
c, Mark O. Liu
d, Jen-Lien Lin
daDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan, ROC
bGraduate School of Optoelectronics Engineering, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan, ROC cInstitute of Electro-Optical and Materials Science, National Formosa University, Huwei, Yunlin 63208, Taiwan, ROC
dMaterial and Chemical Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu 30011, Taiwan, ROC
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:Received 26 September 2007
Received in revised form 24 October 2008 Accepted 28 November 2008 Keywords: Polymers Electrical properties Thermal properties Adhesion
a b s t r a c t
UV-curable organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites have been successfully synthesized with poly-mer monopoly-mers (tetramethoxysilane (TMOS)/3-glycidoxypropyl-trimethoxysilane (GPTMS)) nano-fillers (silica/alumina), curing agents (bisphenol A (BPA)), and photoinitiators (triaryl sulfonium hexafluoroan-timonate (TSH)) by in situ polymerization. Their thermal stability, coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), adhesion strength, and gas barrier capability have also been investigated with thermogravimetry analysis (TGA), thermomechanical analysis (TMA), micro-computer universal testing machine and moisture pen-etration tests. Experimental results indicate that nano-fillers are completely homogeneously dispersed in the polymer matrices and the increase of nano-fillers in the nanocomposites causes the raise of decom-position temperature (Td) as well as gas resistance and the reduction of CTE as well as adhesion strength.
Because lab-made organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites have been discovered to exhibit excellent gas barrier properties, we have also applied them for the encapsulation of organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) and flexible OLEDs. With lab-made nanocomposite d, the lifetimes of OLEDs and flexible OLEDs can be successfully lengthened to 92 and 36 h, respectively, whereas those of OLEDs and flexible OLEDs without encapsulation are 11 and 7 h, respectively.
© 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites are composed of organic polymer matrices (e.g. acrylics, epoxy, and silicone, etc.) as well as inorganic nano-fillers (e.g. silica (SiO2), titanium oxide (TiO2), zinc oxide (ZnO), and alumina (Al2O3), etc.)[1]and have drawn considerable attention because of their excellent mechanical strength, thermal stability, electrical properties, and resistance of staining[2–4]. Furthermore, organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) have also attracted much attention in recent years due to their widespread applications for illumination as well as displays[5]and possess the advantage of higher contrast ratio, lower cost, better brightness, less power consumption, larger viewing angle and faster response time[6–8]. However, their lifetimes have recently become an essential issue for practicability since oxygen and moisture in the air induce the corrosion of organic layers and metal electrode, drop-ping the lifetimes dramatically[9,10]. Without high-performance encapsulating adhesives, the lifetimes of devices are limited.
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +886 3 5712121 55306; fax: +886 3 5724727. E-mail address:[email protected](T.-E. Hsieh).
Although organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites have been uti-lized in biological, mechanical, and electronic regions[11–13], the studies about their encapsulating application are less reported.
In this paper, ultraviolet (UV)-curable organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites have been synthesized with silicone-epoxy monomers, nano-fillers (silica/alumina), curing agents, and pho-toinitiators via in situ polymerization. Because experimental data represent lab-made nanocomposites possess good thermal sta-bility, adhesive properties, and gas barrier capasta-bility, we have then fabricated OLEDs as well as flexible OLEDs and applied them for the encapsulation. Experimental results manifest lab-made organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites are excellent encapsu-lating adhesives and effectively prolong the lifetimes of OLEDs as well as flexible OLEDs.
2. Experimental 2.1. Materials
Tetramethoxysilane (TMOS) and 3-glycidoxypropyl-trimethoxysilane (GPTMS) were utilized as monomers for silicone-epoxy polymer matrices and purchased from Fluka Co. The chemicals used for OLEDs and flexible OLEDs (i.e. naphthyl phenyl ben-zidine (NPB; hole transport material), tris-[8-hydroxyquinoline] aluminum (Alq3;
0254-0584/$ – see front matter © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.11.067
542 M.-H. Chang et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 115 (2009) 541–546
Fig. 1. Chemical structures of NPB, Alq3, and TSH.
light-emitting material), and lithium fluoride (LiF; electron injection material), bisphenol A (BPA; curing agent), triaryl sulfonium hexafluoroantimonate (TSH; pho-toinitiator), hydrogen chloride, and nano-filler (silica/alumina) were obtained from Aldrich Co. (Fig. 1). All the materials in this study were utilized without further purification.
2.2. Preparation of UV-curable organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites (Scheme 1)
GPTMS and TMOS were firstly mixed (2:1 molar ratio) in a beaker with 0.01 M HCl and methanol (1:2 molar ratio) at ambient temperature. The resul-tant two-phase solution was mechanically stirred at a rate of 240 rpm for 1 h to complete hydrolysis and condensation of the silane. Then BPA (10 wt%), sil-ica (30 wt%), alumina (5–15 wt%), and TSH (1 wt%) were added to the solution. After mechanically stirred at a rate of 240 rpm for 4 h, the transparent UV-curable organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites without phase separation were synthesized (nanocomposite a: polymer matrices/silica (30 wt%)/alumina (0 wt%); nanocomposite b: polymer matrices/silica (30 wt%)/alumina (5 wt%); nanocompos-ite c: polymer matrices/silica (30 wt%)/alumina (10 wt%); nanocomposnanocompos-ite d: polymer matrices/silica (30 wt%)/alumina (15 wt%)). The viscosities of lab-made nanocom-posite a, b, c, and d were 12,500, 12,800, 13,200, and 13,700 cps, respectively. 2.3. Instruments
Thermal characterization and viscosity were measured by a DuPont 2950 ther-mogravimetric analyzer (TGA) at a heating rate of 10◦C min−1in the air and a Viscolite 700, respectively. The coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) was inves-tigated by an in-plane thermomechanical analysis (TMA; DuPont 2940) with a micro-expansion probe at a heating rate of 10◦C min−1. Moreover, we also examined the microstructures, gas penetration, and adhesion strength with a transmission electron microscope (TEM; Philips TECNAI G2) operating at 200 kV, Illinois-8501, and a micro-computer universal testing machine (Hung Ta Co.), respectively. The UV lamp used for UV-curing was an Entela UVP 100W. In addition, we recorded the electroluminescent effects and lifetimes of OLEDs by Keithley 2400 and Spectrascan PR650, respectively (Fig. 2). The electrical conducting properties were investigated with a 4-point probe (Everbeing SR-4). The thickness of encapsulating adhesive was measured by a surface profiler (TENCOR P-10).
2.4. Fabrication of OLEDs and flexible OLEDs
The indium tin oxide (ITO) glass (5/) was ultrasonically washed with the acetone, methanol, and de-ionized water for 5 min. After dried with a stream of nitrogen as well as the oven and treatment of O2plasma for 90 s, we deposited
NPB (hole transport layer; 50 nm), Alq3(light-emitting layer; 50 nm), LiF (electron
injection layer; 3 nm), and Al (cathode; 80 nm) layer by layer onto the ITO glass with vacuum evaporation. Finally, lab-made organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites (100m) were deposited on the Al electrode by spin-coating technique (stage I: 1500 r.p.m. for 20 s; stage II: 3500 r.p.m. for 30 s) and cured by UV illumination for 10 s (Fig. 3(a)). The similar process was executed in the fabrication of flexible OLEDs except the ITO glass was replaced with the ITO PET (poly(ethylene terephthalate)) (Fig. 3(b)).
Scheme 1.
Fig. 3. Structures of lab-made OLEDs and flexible OLEDs. (a) ITO glass/NPB (50 nm)/Alq3(50 nm)/LiF (3 nm)/Al (80 nm)/nanocomposite (100m); (b) ITO PET/NPB (50 nm)/Alq3
(50 nm)/LiF (3 nm)/Al (80 nm)/nanocomposite (100m).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. UV curable organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites
Epoxy and silicone resins[14]are well-known polymeric mate-rials for electronic, mechanic, and biological industmate-rials due to their chemical modifiability, high transparency, and good processability.
Nonetheless, discoloration takes place while epoxy polymers are cured at high temperature and silicone polymers have high cost and weak reactivity, causing their long curing duration. In order to achieve a compromise, therefore, we have combined these two materials to silicone-epoxy polymers, which possess no color stain at high curing temperature, moderate cost, and short curing time. Via in situ polymerization, furthermore, silicone-epoxy polymer
Table 1
Thermal, gas barrier, and adhesive properties of lab-made organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites.
Sample Tda(◦C) CTE40–100 ◦ C(ppm◦C−1) Gas permeability (%) Adhesion strength (kgf cm−2)
Nanocomposite a 305 95.28 7.404 89.1
Nanocomposite b 315 94.20 5.312 70.4
Nanocomposite c 320 80.96 3.304 65.7
Nanocomposite d 328 76.62 1.104 53.8
aThe values of T
544 M.-H. Chang et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 115 (2009) 541–546
Fig. 4. TEM results of lab-made organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites. (a) Nanocomposite a, (b) nanocomposite b, (c) nanocomposite c, and (d) nanocomposite d.
monomers are blended with nano-fillers (silica/alumina), curing agents, and photoinitiators to form UV curable organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites as shown inScheme 1and nano-fillers were completely homogeneously dispersed in the polymer matrices as shown in the TEM results (Fig. 4).
The curing duration for lab-made organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites with the irradiation of UV is 10 s while that with conventional thermal method is several hours. With UV proce-dure, the whole production efficiency can be promoted and the product is immediately ready for testing, shipment, and stor-age rather than a multi-step thermal drying process. Moreover, UV procedure has lower energy consumption and is also an environment-friendly technology without emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and flammability.
3.2. Thermal properties and electrical insulation
Fig. 5 indicates the thermal characterization of lab-made organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites. As shown inTable 1, the decomposing temperature (Td; 5 wt% weight loss) of nanocom-posite a is approximately 305◦C. When 5, 10, and 15 wt% of alumina were added, nevertheless, their Tdraise and reach 315, 320, 328◦C, respectively. The improvement of the thermal prop-erties was attributed to the high thermal stability of nano-fillers (silica/alumina). The CTE of lab-made organic/inorganic hybrid
nanocomposites are also shown inFig. 6and tabulated inTable 1. We observe that the CTE decrease with the increase of alumina because the epoxy network with high amounts of nano-fillers rises the crosslinking portions and forms rigid structure, leading to the decline of CTE.
Fig. 6. TMA curves of lab-made organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites.
The electrical conductivities of lab-made organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites have also been investigateed. According to the experimental results of electrical resistance measurement, all of lab-made organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites have no elec-trical conductivities. The elecelec-trical insulation of nanocomposites may avoid electrical interference of devices while they are applied for encapsulating adhesives.
3.3. Gas permeability and adhesion strength
As shown inTable 1, the gas permeability and adhesion strength decrease with the increase of alumina since nano-fillers exhibit excellent resistance to gas penetration and low surface energy with the glass. In case of nanocomposite d, its gas permeability and adhe-sion strength can reach 1.104% and 53.8%, respectively.
3.4. Encapsulation of OLEDs and flexible OLEDs with organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites
Since nanocomposite d has best gas barrier capability among all of lab-made organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites, we have utilized it for the encapsulation of OLEDs and flexible OLEDs. In case of OLEDs without encapsulation, as shown inFig. 7, the luminance sharply reduces while the device is actuated and the half-lifetime, defined as the duration when the luminance decays from the
orig-Fig. 7. The lifetimes of lab-made OLEDs.
Fig. 8. The lifetimes of lab-made flexible OLEDs.
inal amount to its half, is only 11 h, representing the oxygen and moisture in the air cause the corrosion for metal electrode and organic layers. Nevertheless, the half-lifetime dramatically rises to 92 h while nanocomposite d is encapsulated in the device. This result manifests organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites can resist the penetration of moisture and oxygen in the air into the OLEDs, quenching the degradation of metal electrode as well as organic materials and rising the lifetimes. Compared with com-mercial UV curable encapsulating adhesive (EPO-TEK H20S; Epoxy technology Inc.), lab-made nanocomposite d has shorter curing time and longer lifetime because the half-lifetimes and curing time of OLEDs with EPO-TEK H20S are 43 h and 3 min, respectively.
The similar result can be found in the case of flexible OLEDs (Fig. 8). The half-lifetimes of flexible OLEDs with the encapsulation of nanocomposite d is 36 h, which is 5.1 and 2.7 folds longer than those without encapsulation and with EPO-TEK H20S, respectively. This result demonstrates organic/inorganic hybrid nanocompos-ites exhibit excellent gas blocking effect, promoting the lifetimes of flexible OLEDs.
4. Conclusions
We conclude that UV curable organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposites with high thermal stability, fast curing time, good adhesion strength, moderate CTE, and excellent gas resistance have been successfully prepared by in situ polymerization. Furthermore, they have also been proved to be a superior material for encapsula-tion of electronic devices since the lifetimes of OLEDs and flexible OLEDs with encapsulation are 8.4 and 5.1 times longer than those without encapsulation, respectively.
Acknowledgement
Financial support by ITRI 7354DC4300 is highly appreciated.
References
[1] I.S. Chronakis, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 167 (2005) 283. [2] X. Yang, T. Dai, Y. Lu, Polymer 47 (2006) 441.
[3] J. Huang, C. He, X. Liu, J. Xu, C.S.S. Tay, S.Y. Chow, Polymer 46 (2005) 7018. [4] C. Wu, T. Xu, W. Yang, Eur. Polym. J. 41 (2005) 1901.
[5] H.Y. Lin, J.H. Lee, M.K. Wei, C.L. Dai, C.F. Wu, Y.H. Ho, H.Y. Lin, T.C. Wu, Opt. Commun. 275 (2007) 464.
546 M.-H. Chang et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 115 (2009) 541–546 [6] C.W. Tang, S.A. VanSlyke, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51 (1987) 913.
[7] C.W. Tang, S.A. VanSlyke, C.H. Chen, J. Appl. Phys. 65 (1989) 3610. [8] J. Lu, Y. Tao, Y. Chi, Y. Tung, Synth. Met. 155 (2005) 56.
[9] S.F. Lim, W. Wang, S.J. Chua, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 85 (2001) 154.
[10] L.M. Do, K. Kim, T. Zyung, H.K. Shim, J.J. Kim, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70 (1997) 3470. [11] E. Picard, H. Gauthier, J.F. Gerard, E. Espuche, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 307 (2007)
364.
[12] V. Vladimirov, C. Betchev, A. Vassiliou, G. Papageorgiou, D. Bikiaris, Compos. Sci. Technol. 66 (2006) 2935.
[13] M. Frounchi, S. Dadbin, Z. Salehpour, M. Noferesti, J. Membr. Sci. 282 (2006) 142.
[14] A.V. Pocius, Adhesion and Adhesive Technology: An Introduction, Munich/ Hauser Publishers, New York, 1997, p. 208.