• 沒有找到結果。

數位遊戲化的聽覺口語法輔助工具之設計 - 政大學術集成

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "數位遊戲化的聽覺口語法輔助工具之設計 - 政大學術集成"

Copied!
59
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1). 立. 政 治 大. ‧ 國. 學. Design of A Digital Game-Based Auditory Verbal. Nat n. al. er. io. sit. y. ‧. Therapy Assistive Tool. Ch. i Un. engchi. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(2) . I. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(3) Abstract Auditory Verbal Therapy is one of the early therapies used on hearingimpaired children. The main purpose of this therapy is to help hearing-impaired children learn speaking and listening, and it focuses on practices in daily life. After interviewing some main caretakers to hearing-impaired children, we found that due to the lack of learning resources, the care takers of the children were often bothered by the preparation of teaching materials. Digital Game-based Learning is an innovative way of learning, which may ameliorate the learners’ motivation toward learning by digital games. This study aimed at integrating Auditory Verbal Therapy and Digital Game-based Learning to make a tool that assisted Auditory Verbal Therapy. The assistive tool may help the hearing-impaired children enjoy learning and also decrease the care taker’s burden of instruction material preparation. We designed a ‘Situated Instructional Game Assistive in Auditory Verbal Drills’ as a prototype to our research. The main function of the game was listening proficiency training. Together with some adorable scenes and interesting images and animations, the game was more entertaining and immersed the children in the scenarios and stories. The prototypical tool allowed the game to have different levels and also allowed the users to create new game levels. The design of the levels in the game was to ask hearing-impaired children to listen to the scenarios and make choices according to the stories they had heard. Creating new game levels was a standard process of making game levels, which provided the main care takers with materials to simply create new levels by adding a few audio II. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(4) components, and the new levels would then be ready for use in instruction. We invited six families with hearing-impaired children to use our prototypical tool under the user-testing stage in this study. Afterwards, we assessed and evaluated the tool by the following methods: Participant Observation, Semi-Structured Interviews and Questionnaire Survey. According of the results of the assessment and evaluation, it is positive that the Situated Instructional Game Assistive in Auditory Verbal Drills’ provided in this study was able to ameliorate the hearing-impaired children’s motivation toward learning. Also, the tool made the preparation of instruction materials more easy and efficient than it was before. In addition, we also found that allowing the hearing-impaired children create a new level in the game would make them more familiar with the scenario and stimulate them to think, which yielded the same results with Auditory Verbal Therapy.. Keywords: Auditory Verbal Therapy, Digital Game-Based Learning, Hearing Impaired, Early Intervention III. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(5) . .......................................................................................................... 6. .................................................................................................. 8. ”. ....................................................................................................... 8 ...................................................................................................... 8 .................................................................................................... 10 .................................................................................................... 15. 政 治 大. ............................................................................................. 19. ”. 立 ............................................................................................ 19. ‧ 國. ‧. ........................................................................................................ 21. ................................................................................................ 24. sit. y. Nat. 學. ”. ............................................................................................ 20. ”. ........................................................................................................ 25. ”. ........................................................................................................ 26. n. al. er. ........................................................................................................ 24. io. ”. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. ............................................................................................ 26 ................................................................................................ 28 ”. ........................................................................................................ 29 .................................................................................................... 29 ............................................................................................................ 30 ............................................................................................................ 31 ............................................................................................................ 32 2. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(6) . ..................................................................................... 35. ”. ......................................................................................... 35. ”. ........................................................................................................ 38. ”. ........................................................................................................ 43. ”. ................................................................................................. 45. ........................................................................................................ 47. ”. ................................................................................................................ 47. ”. ........................................................................................................ 48. 學. .............................................................................................................. 50. ‧ 國. ‧. Nat. y. io. n. al. sit. Ch. er. ”. 治 政 ........................................................................................................ 49 大 立. engchi. i Un. v. 3. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(7) 2-1 1993. 2006. ………………………12. 2-2. …………………………………………………..15. 2-3. ………………………………………………………………..21. 3-1. ………………………………………………..25. 3-2. ………………………………………………..25. 3-3. …………………………………………………..30. 3-4. ……………………………………………..31. 3-5. y. sit. ………………………………………………..39. n. al. ……………………………………….………..45. er. io. 5-2. …….…………………………………………..37. Nat. 5-1. …….…………………………………………..35. ‧. 4-2. ‧ 國. 4-1. ……….…………………………………..34. 學. 3-6. 立. 政 治 大 ………….…………………………………..32. 5-3. Ch. i Un. v. ………...………………………….………..46. engchi. 4. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(8) 3-1. ………………………………………………………………….24. 3-2. ……………………………………………………………..27. 3-3. ……………………………………………………………..28. 3-4. ………………………………………………………..29. 3-5. ………………………………………………....……..29. 3-6 The Smileyometer…………………………………………………………….33 3-7 The Funometer………………………………………………………………..33. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat al. Ch. engchi. 5. i Un. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(9) . Oller & Eilers, 1988. Menn & Stoel-Gammon, 2005. Yoshinaga-Itano Sedey. 立. 政 治 大 Coulter Mehl 1998. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat al. Committee on Infant Hearing. Ch. engchi. JCIH. i Un. v. Joint. 2007. 2007. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, 2007. 2010. 2012 2017 2007 6. 28.70%. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(10) 2016 2016. 90.7%. 2002. 30.3%. 78.1%. Dornan, Hickson, Murdoch, & Houston, 2007; Geers, 2006; Rhoades, 2001. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 y sit. io. n. al. er. Nat. —. Ch. engchi. 7. i Un. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(11) . ”. 1969 Pollack. Doreen. acoupedic programme 50. 1996. 政 治 大. 立. ‧ 國. 學. Auditory-Verbal International, 1991 Estabrooks, 1993. ‧. AG Bell, 1991. io. sit. y. Nat n. al. er. Caleffe-Schenck,1992; Lim & Simser, 2005; Goldberg, 1993. Ling. Ch 1993. i Un. v. Estabrooks, 2006, pp.4-5. engchi. Dunst, Trivette, Davis, & Cornwell, 1988. 2014. Smith, Polloway, 8. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(12) Patton, & Dowdy, 2001. Duquette, Durieux-Smith, Olds, Fitzpatrick, Eriks-Brophy, & Whittingham, 2002; Easterbrooks & O’Rourke, 2001; Hogan, Stokes, White, Tyszkiewicz, & Woolgar, 2008; Wu & Brown, 2004; Warner-Czyz, Davis, & Morrison, 2005 ; — 2014 2014. 立. 1.. ‧ 國. 學. 1994. ‧. io. sit. y. Nat. al. n. 2.. Simser, 1993. er. Estabrooks. 政 治 大. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. Marlowe 1993. Estabrooks, 1993; Simser, 1993 3.. 9. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(13) — Simser, 1993; Estabrooks, 1993 4. Simser, 1993 Pollack et al., 1997. 5.. —. Cole & Flexer, 2007. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 政 治 大 —. sit er. al. n. Goldberg. y. ‧. io. 6.. Nat. Estabrooks, 1993, 1994; Marlowe, 1993; Simser, 1993. Ch. ─. engchi. i Un. v. 1993. 1. 2.. 10. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(14) 3.. 4.. 5. ─ 6.. 立. ‧ 國 n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 9.. ‧. 8.. 學. 7.. 政 治 大. 2009. Ch. i Un. v. e nDanser g c h i2016. Kaipa. 2-1 85%. —. 11. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(15) Dornan, Hickson, Murdoch, & Houston, 2007; Geers, 2006; Rhoades, 2001; Lin — , 2011. Kaipa & Danser. 2016. Goldberg & Flexer. 1993. N= 366. = 42.9%. 政 治 大. 立. 78.5%. 學. ‧ 國. 86.7%. ‧. 2001. 114. y. Nat. Goldberg & Flexer. io. sit. 2009. 2013. n. al. er. 2-1 1993. Ch. Robertson & Flexer. i Un. v. = 36%. engchi. 11.7 N = 319 90%. 1993 85%. Pappas —. 1994 12. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(16) Duncan & Rochecouste 1999. Easterbrook —. 立. 政 治57% 大. 2000. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. 2000. Nat. McCaffrey —. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. Rhoades & Chisolm 2001 100%. 13. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(17) Warner-Czyz —. Dornan —. 2005. 2010. 政 治 大. 學. ‧ 國. 立. Jackson & Schatschneier. ‧. 2013. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat al. Duncan. Wray —. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 1999. 1997 14. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(18) Wu & Brown. 2004. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 2014. n. al. Ch. engchi. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 2-2. 2-2. i Un. v. 1.. 2. 3.. 4. 15. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(19) 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 1. ─. 3.. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 政 2. 治 大 4.. Nat. —. n. al. Ch. er. io. sit. y. ‧. 1.. 2.. engchi. 16. i Un. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(20) 1.. …… 2.. 立. 政 治 大. ‧ 國. 學. ‧. ─. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. —. 17. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(21) ”. 立. ’. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. B. ‧. ‧ 國. “. 政 A治 大. “. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. ” C “. 18. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(22) ”. D. 1. 2. 2016. ─. ”. ‧. 2010. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 2008. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 政 治 大. Prensky 2001, 2007. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 19. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(23) 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.. ”. 立 Randel —. Pierfy. 3. 1992. 15. 學. 68. 38. 56% O. ‧. ‧ 國. 1977 22. 32%. 政 治 大. Leary —. 2005. 22. Nat. er. io. sit. y. Kuo 2007. al. —. n. iv n C Gopher, Weil, & Bareket, h 1994; Sparrowhawk, & Heald, 2002; e nMcFarlane, gchi U Whitehall & McDonald, 1993. Kirriermuir. McFarlane 2004. 1.. ─. 2.. 20. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(24) Chen. Lee 2009 2015 Rosas —. ”. 立. 2003. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 y. Nat n. al. er. io. sit. 2-3. Ch. Lingokids. engchi. Lingokids. i Un. v. APP. 2-3. 1. APP. 21. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(25) 2. Fun Chinese APP. 3. APP. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 4. Lingokids. 政 治 大. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. APP. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 5. C-PEN 2.0 ——─. 22. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(26) 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat al. Ch. engchi. 23. i Un. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(27) . ”. 3-1 1.. 立. 2.. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 3.. n. hi-fi ; high fidelity. • • •. Ch. engchi. • • •. i Un. v. • • • •. 3-1. 24. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(28) . ”. 4-6. 3-1 3-2 3-1. 政 治 大. 立. ‧ 國. 學. 3 3. 4. D. 4. 11. 10. io. 2. al. 3. n. 3-2. 8. sit. C. Nat. 8. er. 4. ‧. B. y. 4. A. Ch. engchi. A. 5. 11. B. 5. 5. C. 4. 1. D. 5. 5. 4. 4. E. 5. 10. 4. 10. F. 5. 2. 4. 2. i Un. v. 4 4. 9 2. 25. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(29) . ”. ”. 1.. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 2014. 26. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(30) 3-2. 政 治 大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 2.. 3-2. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 3-3. 27. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(31) 3-3. 1.. 立. ‧ 國. y sit. n. al. er. io. (4). Nat. (3). ‧. (2). 學. (1). 政 治 大. (5). Ch. engchi. i Un. v. (6) (7) (8) (9) —— 2. Keynote 28. Unity. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(32) 3-4. Keynote 3-5. ─ C#. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 y. Nat. 3-5. n. al. er. io. 3-4. sit. Unity. v ni C h” engchi U. 29. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(33) 3-3. 3-3. 政 治 大. 學. ‧ 國. 立. ‧. 3C. y. n. al. er. io. sit. Nat. Ch. engchi. 30. i Un. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(34) 3-4. 立. 3-4. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat al. Ch. engchi. 31. i Un. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(35) ─. 立. The Smileyometer. 3-6. MacFarlane. The Smileyometer. The Funometer. 2002. Risdan. 3-7. The Funometer. Hanna. The. n. al. The. er. io. sit. y. Nat Smileyometer. Casey. ‧. Smileyometer. Read. 學. ‧ 國. -5. Kanerva 1997. 政 治 大. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 3-5. 01. 02.. 32. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(36) 3-6 The Smileyometer. Casey. 2002. 3-7 The Funometer. Risdan. Hanna. 學. ‧ 國. MacFarlane. 政 治 大. 立. Kanerva 1997. 3-6. ‧. Likert Scale. Read. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat al. 3-5. 3-6. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 1.. 2.. 33. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(37) 3.. 3-6. 政 治 大. 立. ‧ 國. 06.. sit. n. 05.. al. er. io. 04.. y. Nat. 03.. ‧. 02.. 學. 01.. ─. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. ─. 07. 08. 09. 10. 11.. 34. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(38) . . ”. 4-1. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. io. sit. y. Nat n. al. er. 4-1. 政 治 大. Ch. engchi. 35. i Un. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(39) “. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat al. Ch. engchi. 36. i Un. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(40) 4-2. 4-2. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat al. Ch. engchi. 37. i Un. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(41) 立. 政 治 大. 2.. sit. n. al. er. io. 4.. y. Nat. 3.. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 1.. 5. 6.. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. ”. 3-2. ”. 1.. 38. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(42) ” 2. F. 立. 政4-3 治 大 F. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 28. B. 1. a 39 l. C. 2. 49. D. 2. E F. io. sit. y. Nat 2. A. 4. 30. n. er. 4-3. F. Ch. engchi. 4i Un. v. 36. 5. 27. 2. 5. 16. 1. 43. 5. 11. 1. 38. 3. 12. 3.. 39. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(43) 4-6 4.. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 5.. 政 治 大. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat al. 4-6. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 6.. 40. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(44) 2. 7.. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 1.. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 2. 2 41. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(45) 3.. 4.. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 1.. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 2.. 3.. B F 42. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(46) B. F F. B B. ”. ‧. ”. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 政 治 大. 3C. n. er. io. al. sit. y. Nat. 1.. A. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. B OK D 2.. A. 43. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(47) D 3.. A 3C 3C 20 B 3C C. 政 治 大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. io. y sit. Nat. B. n. al. er. 4.. D. 30. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. E. F 5. B. ”. 44. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(48) B 6.. ’. ’. F. ”. 5-1. sit. n. al. er. io. 4-4. B. y. Nat. D. B D. ‧. ”. 學. 4-4. ‧ 國. 立. 政 治 大. Ch. i Un. engchi. v. 01.. 100%. 0%. 02.. 66.7%. 33.3%. 5-3 4. 45. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(49) ” ─ 4-5. 01.. 政 治 大 4.17. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. i v4.33 n U. 4.5. 5. 4.5. 4.5. 4. 5. 07.. 4.5. 4.5. 4. 5. 08.. 4.5. 4.5. 4. 5. 09.. 4.5. 4.5. 4. 5. 10.. 4.5. 4.5. 4. 5. 3.33. 4. 立. 02.. ‧ 國. ‧. 4.17. 4.33. ─. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 04.. 學. 03.. 3.83. 05. 06.. Ch ─. engchi. 11.. 46. 4. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(50) ”. 政 治 大. 學. —. ‧. ‧ 國. 立. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat al. Ch. engchi. 47. i Un. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(51) 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 sit. io. n. er. Nat al. y. ”. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. ─ ——. 48. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(52) . ”. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat al. Ch. engchi. 49. i Un. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(53) 1.. 2016 30. 2.. 2009 98. 3.. 2014. 4.. 立. 2008 治 政 大. 2010 1-19. ‧. 6.. ‧ 國. 91. (2015). (. n. al. 2010. Ch. engchi. sit. 2008. er. io. 8.. ). y. Nat. 7.. T&D. 學. 5.. 9.. 27-50. i Un. v. :. AG Bell Academy for Listening and Spoken Language, (2011). Principles of LSLS.. 10. Auditory-Verbal International, (1991). Auditory-verbal position statement. The Auricle, 4, 11-12. 11. Caleffe-Schenck, N., (1992). The auditory-verbal method: Description of a training program for audiologists, speech language pathologists, and teachers of 50. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(54) children with hearing loss. The Volta Review, 94, 65-68. 12. Chen, M.-P., & Lee, C.-Y., (2009). A computer game as a context for non-routine mathematical problem solving: The effects of type of question prompt and level of prior knowledge. Computers & Education, 52(3), 530-542. 13. Cole, E. B., & Flexer, C. A., (2007). Children with hearing loss: Developing listening and talking, birth to six. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing. 14. Dornan, D., Hickson, L., Murdoch, B., & Houston, T., (2007). Outcomes of an auditory-verbal program for children with hearing loss: A comparative study. 政 治 大. with a matched group of children with typical hearing. The Volta Review, 107. 立. (1), 37–54.. ‧ 國. 學. 15. Duncan, J., & Rochecouste, J. (1999). Length and complexity of utterances. ‧. produced by kindergarten children with impaired hearing and their hearing peers.. sit. y. Nat. Australian Joumal of Education of the Deaf, 5, 63-69.. n. al. er. io. 16. Duncan, J., (1999). Conversational skills with hearing loss and children with. i Un. v. normal hearing in an integrated setting. The Volta Review, 101(4), 193-211.. Ch. engchi. 17. Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., Davis, M., & Cornwell, J., (1988). Enabling and empowering families of children with health impairments. Children’s Health Care, 17(2), 71–81. 18. Easterbrook, S. R., O'Rourke, C. M., & Todd, N.W., (2000). Child & family factors associated with deaf children's success in A-V therapy. The American Journal of Otology, 21, 341-344. 19. Estabrooks, W. (Ed.), (1994). Auditory-verbal therapy: for parents and professionals. Washington, DC: A.G. Bell. 51. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(55) 20. Estabrooks, W., (1993). Still listening…auditory-verbal therapy for “older” children. The Volta Reviews, 95(3), 231-252. 21. Estabrooks, W., (2006). Auditory-verbal therapy and practice. Washington, DC: AGB Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing. 22. Geers, A., (2006). Factors influencing spoken language outcomes in children following early cochlear implantation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol, 64, 50-65. 23. Goldberg, D. M., (1993). Auditory-verbal philosophy: A tutorial. The Volta Review, 95(3), 181-186.. 政 治 大. 24. Goldberg, D. M., & Flexer, C., (1993). Outcome survey of auditory-verbal. 立. graduates: Study of clinical efficacy. Journal of the American Academy of. ‧ 國. 學. Audiology, 4(3), 189-200.. ‧. 25. Goldberg, D. M., & Flexer, C., (2001). Auditory-verbal graduates: Outcomes. y. sit. n. al. er. io. 12(8), 406-414.. Nat. survey of clinical efficacy. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology,. i Un. v. 26. Gopher, D., Weil, M., & Bareket, T., (1994). Transfer of skill from a computer. Ch. engchi. game trainer to flight. Human Factors, 36(3), 387-405.. 27. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, (2007). Year 2007 Position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention. Pediatrics, 120, 898-921. 28. Kaipa, Ramesh and Michelle L Danser., (2016). Efficacy of auditory-verbal therapy in children with hearing impairment: A systematic review from 1993 to 2015. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 86, 124-34. 29. Kuo, M. J. (2007). How does an online game based learning environment 52. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(56) promote students’ intrinsic motivation for learning natural science and how does it affect their learning outcomes? Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhances Learning, 135-143. 30. Kirriemuir, J., & McFarlane, A., (2004). Literature review in games and learning. Bristol: Nesta Futurelabs. 31. Lin, H. C.,Shu, M. T., Lee, K. S., Lin, H. Y., Lin, G., (2007). Reducing false positives in newborn hearing screening program: how and why. Otology & Neurotology, 6(28), 788-792.. 政 治 大. 32. Ling, L., (1993). Auditory-Verbal Options for Children with Hearing. 立. Impairment: Helping to Pioneer An Applied Science. The Volta Review, 95, 187-. ‧ 國. 學. 196.. ‧. 33. Lim, SYC. & Simser, J., (2005). Auditory-verbal therapy for children with. sit. y. Nat. hearing impairment. Annals Academy of Medicine, 34(4), 308-312.. n. al. er. io. 34. Marlowe, J., (1993). Audiological Assessment and Management in the Auditory-. i Un. verbal Approach. The Volta Review, 95, 205-215.. Ch. engchi. v. 35. McCaffrey, H., Davis, B. L., MacNeilage, P.F., & Von H. D., (2000). Multichannel cochlear implantation and the organization of early speech. The Volta Review, 101(1), 5-28. 36. McFarlane, A., Sparrowhawk, A. and Heald, Y., (2002). The role of games in education. 37. Menn, L. & Stoel-Gammon, C., (2005). Phonological development: Learning sounds and sound patterns. In J. Berko Gleason (Ed.), The development of language (6th ed.), pp. 62-111. Needham Heights, MA: Pearson. 53. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(57) A research report to DfES. 38. O’Neil HF, Baker EL and Wainess R., (2005). Classification of learning outcomes: Evidence from the computer games literature. Curriculum Journal, 16(4), 455-474. 39. Oller, D. K., & Eilers, R. E., (1988). The role of audition in infant babbling. Child development, 441-449. 40. Pappas, D. G., Flexer, C., & Shackelford, L., (1994). Otological and habilitative management of children with Down Syndrome. Laryngoscope, 104(9), 1065-1070.. 立. 政 治 大. 41. Pierfy, D. A., (1977). Comparative simulation game research: Stumbling blocks. ‧ 國. 學. and steppingstones. Simulation & Games, 8(2), 255-268.. ‧. 42. Pollack, D., Goldberg, D. M., & Caleffe-Schenck, N., (1997). Educational. sit. y. Nat. audiology for the limited-hearing infant and preschooler: An auditory-verbal. n. al. er. io. program. Charles C Thomas Pub Limited.. i Un. v. 43. Prensky, M., (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-638.. Ch. engchi. 44. Prensky, M., (2007). Digital Game-Based Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill. 45. Randel, J., Morris, B., Wetzel, C. D., & Whitehall, B., (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A review of recent research. Simulation & Gaming, 23(3), 261-276. 46. Read, J. C., MacFarlane, S. J., & Casey, C., (2002, August). Endurability, engagement and expectations: Measuring children’s fun. In Interaction design and children (Vol. 2, pp. 1-23). Shaker Publishing Eindhoven. 54. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(58) 47. Rhoades, E. A., (2001). Language progress with an auditory-verbal approach for young children with hearing loss. International Pediatrics, 16(1), 41-47. 48. Rhoades EA, Chisolm TH., (2001). Global language progress with an auditoryverbal approach. The Volta Review, 101(2), 5-24. 49. Robertson L, Flexer C., (1993). Reading development: A parent survey of children with hearing impairment who developed speech and language through the A-V method. The Volta Review, 95(3), 253–261. 50. Rosas, R., Nussbaum, M., Cumsille, P., Marianov, V., Correa, M., & Flores P. et. 政 治 大. al., (2003). Beyond Nintendo: Design and assessment of educational video. 立. games for first and second grade students. Computers & Education, 40(1), 71-94.. ‧ 國. 學. 51. Simser, J., (1993). Auditory-Verbal Intervention: Infants and toddlers. The Volta. ‧. Review, 95(3), 217-229.. sit. y. Nat. 52. Smith, T., Polloway, E., Patton, J. & Dowdy, C., (2001). Teaching students with. n. al. er. io. special Needs in inclusive settings. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.. i Un. v. 53. Warner-Czyz, A. D., Davis, B. L., & Morrison, H. M., (2005). Production. Ch. engchi. accuracy in a young cochlear implant recipient. Volta Review, 105(2), 151. 54. Whitehall, B.V., & McDonald, B.A., (1993). Improving learning persistence of military personnel by enhancing motivation in a technical training program . Simulation & Gaming, 24(3), 294-313. 55. Wray, D., Flexer, C., &Vaccaro, V., (1997). Classroom performance of children who are hearing impaired and who learned spoken communication through the A-V approach: An evaluation of treatment efficacy. The Volta Review, 99(2), 107-119. 55. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(59) 56. Wu, C. D, & Brown, P. M., (2004). Parents' and teachers' expectations of Auditory-Verbal therapy. The Volta Review, 104(1), 5-20. 57. Yoshinaga-Itano, C., & Apuzzo, M. L., (1998). Identification of hearing loss after age 18 months is not early enough. American Annals of the Deaf, 143(5), 380-387.. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat al. Ch. engchi. 56. i Un. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.DCT.010.2018.B02.

(60)

參考文獻

相關文件

6 《中論·觀因緣品》,《佛藏要籍選刊》第 9 冊,上海古籍出版社 1994 年版,第 1

The first row shows the eyespot with white inner ring, black middle ring, and yellow outer ring in Bicyclus anynana.. The second row provides the eyespot with black inner ring

substance) is matter that has distinct properties and a composition that does not vary from sample

Teachers may consider the school’s aims and conditions or even the language environment to select the most appropriate approach according to students’ need and ability; or develop

In 2006, most School Heads perceived that the NET’s role as primarily to collaborate with the local English teachers, act as an English language resource for students,

• Is the school able to make reference to different sources of assessment data and provide timely and effective feedback to students according to their performance in order

This research was based on a 12-year compulsory education syllabus in the field of mathematics, and it integrated mathematical culture to develop game-based lesson plans to

Hope theory: A member of the positive psychology family. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive