第二外国語としての日本語学習の動機づけと学習態度
34
0
0
全文
(2) . Jin-Ji Lu. Fu-Shun Wang . .
(3) 118 .
(4) ¡¢ £¤¥¦£¡§¨ © ª«
(5) ¬® ¯°±²³´µ¶· ¸¹º»¼½¾± ²³¿À¢ £Á¾º»À¨Â¦½¾£Ã ÄÅÆ © ÇÈ ÉÊËÌÍ º»Î¨ÏÐÑÒ¼Ó¨ÔÕÖ× ØÙÂÊÚÏÐÛÜ ÝÞÏÐßàáâÏÐãäåæÏÐçè ÏÐÆ£éÏÐêë쾩
(6) . . . ¡
(7) ¢£ ¤¥¦§¨© ¥ª«¬® ¯ °±¢£²¢£³´µ¶·¸¢£¹º¡·»¼½¥ ¾¿ÀÁ«¡ ¢£²Ã¢£ÄÂ¥¡À¿Å â£ÆÇ ÈÉ«ÊË ¢£¡ Ì·Í ÎÏ ÐÑÒ ÓÊÔÃ⣢£ ¢£ÆÇ.
(8) 119 . . .
(9) 120 . Abstract. With the increase of Japanese learners, learning objectives and motivations become varied. To help students achieve their learning objectives, a teacher should understand students’ learning motivation and attitude, examining their learning performances.. Choosing students who take elective Japanese of Hsiuping Institute of Technology and of Providence University as research objects, this research studies undergraduates’ curriculum needs and views on taking elective Japanese. From the statistical analysis, a concrete and preliminary result is carried out.. 1.. Motivation of learning Japanese: With factor analysis used, the results of forty questions are grouped into five. factors as follows: Integrative motivation — Japan understanding factor and Japan worshiping factor Instrumental motivation — occupational interest factor Incentive motivation — inducible factor Elite motivation — self-content factor Intrinsic motivation— integrative motivation and elite motivation Extrinsic motivation— instrumental motivation and incentive motivation . The interaction of these four groups of motivations, or five factors, forms a motivation complex, encouraging students to learn Japanese. Besides, this research studies the comparison of five factors considering learners’ different demographic characteristics..
(10) 121 . 2.. Attitude toward learning Japanese: The result of factor analysis is grouped into two key factors; one is active. learning factor, and the other is diligence factor.. Keywords: second foreign language, learning Japanese, motivation, learning attitude.
(11) 122 .
(12) ¡ ¢£ ¤¥¦§¨©ª«¬®¯¡°¬ ±²¤ ³ ´ µ¶·¸¹ º»¼½¾¿ À¼ÁÂÃļÅÆÇ °¬ ÈÉÊË« °¬Ì¨ÍË«¡ ÎÏÐ ÑÒª«ÓË ÒÔÕÖ×ت ÙÚÛ ÛØܸÝÞª« ¸ßàá⪤ãä¯×Ø¡ åææç ßàè骫ê ë¸ìíª«îïðããä ñææò ó âôõöã÷ãä øùç ó¡ãú¬ûüý þãúÿ. ~ ãú鮯}ª«®ÔÆ¡ÿ~|{ãú¬¸ãú[
(13) Æ\ð]^ _« `@¸?Õ¬ >= ×Ø¡ ÿ~|{ <;]^ :®Ê/.-«¡ ,æ +*) . (¤ÿ'«« ÿ~|{@&®××%$«¡# Õ" Dornyei(2001) !01ú2345« ÿ~(motivation) 67 ÿ8[(direction) (magnitude)Æ® ãú9ÿA® ¡McGroaty(2001) ÿ~¸B6® / CDEF
(14) ]^GH¸ì{¤IJ®ÖÝÕ «¡Crookes and Schmidt (1991) K.-8[ª« ÿ~|{LMãúNO¸_{P ]1Ë«¡ãú¬QR S ¶T UVW ãúXY Za®ÿ~|{GH¸bcØÝÕ8¡defñ,,ñg ãúh ãúÿ~|{ij
(15) Ø
(16) Økl¸mnª ¤Õã úhÿ~|{o/«® ãú¬Ë«pqãúEF¸%r Ê ãúÿ~|{« ãúZs¸Ít Øuܸv_ 1
(17) .
(18) 123 . Reilly(1994)
(19)
(20)
(21) (Ellis1997)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25) ¡¢£ ¤¡¥¦ §¨© ª«¬® ¤¡ ¯°¨±
(26) ² ³ ´µ¶·¤¡
(27) ¶ ² ´¸
(28) ¶
(29) ¹ ´ º» ¼½ ´¾ ¤¡ . «¿ ¢£ÀÁÂÃÄ ¢£Å³¡·Æ¢£ª Ç «¿ ÈÉ· ºÊË Ì ¯°²²Í² ÎÏ Ð(intrinsic motivation) ÎÏ Ð(extrinsic motivation) ° Ñ·°Ï ·Ò ¡®¢£· ij¬Æ® ¢£ ¤² Ä® ²¥©¦§Ó Ô·°Ì¼
(30) .
(31) 124 .
(32)
(33) Deci
(34)
(35) ¡¢
(36) £
(37) ¤¥ ¦§¨ §¨ §¨©
(38) ª «¬Gardner and Lambert®«
(39) ª ¯ °±«¬²³´(integrative motivation)(instrumental motivation)
(40) ´ ¬µ
(41)
(42) ¶ ·¸¹º
(43) » ¼½ ¾ ¿
(44) »ÀÁ
(45) ÁÂ ¢
(46) à Ĭ Å ¼½ ¾ ¹ Á Æ´ (Gardner and Lambert 1972)
(47) à ÷ÇÈ ·
(48) ¹
(49) ¤¥ ÉÁ ÊË
(50) Gardner¤¥Gardner and Lambert (1959,1972) ´ · Lukmani(1972) ÌͺÎÏÐ Â
(51) ¹Ñ
(52) Horwitz(1990) º
(53) ·´Â ¡
(54) Ò ¯ÓÔ¼¢Õ ºÖ×Ì£ º¤Ø
(55) ¥
(56) Ö×Ì£ Ö¦§Ìº
(57) ´·Â ¨Ù© ª
(58) Ö¦§Ìº°±
(59) ÎÚ¢
(60) «ÛÕ ¬ ÜÝÞ
(61) £ß ·
(62) Gardner¡® àÇȯ
(63) °
(64) ±ª ¯ ª¯ Çȯ ²á
(65) ·.
(66) 125 . Oxford and Shearin (1994)
(67)
(68)
(69)
(70)
(71). ¡¢££¤¥¦ ¤
(72) §§ ¨© ª «¬ ¬¦®¯ ° ± ¡²³³´¤
(73) µ ¶ · ¡¸¹ º » ¤ ¢³ ¼¬ ´³ ¼¤©ª ½¾¿ ÀÁ¶¾¿ ©  ½ ÃÄ ¡¦½
(74)  µ¤¢£Å¤ ¤¥¦ §¡¢££Æ
(75) ÇÈ É ÊËÌ ¶¨ © Í ¨ ©ÎÏ
(76) À Ъ« ¬ÑÅ®±¯ÒÅ®±°±Å®±¤  ²Ó³ ´µ· ¶· ÔÕ Ô¦ Ö¬  ×زӳ٬Ѯ±ÏÄ´ ¸¹Úº µ·Ù¬Ñ®±ÏÄ °±Å®±
(77) µ· ÔÖÛ µ·¶ÜϬ »¼ ¸½Õ ¾ ¯ÒÅ¿ ÜÀÁ  ¶¨© Ýᢣ£
(78) Gardner & Lambert(1972) Ĩů ÝÆ ÎÞ ½ ÇÈ ×Ø ´ ½É¾¿À®±¬ÑÅ®±°±Å®± ÊËß®± ®±¯Ò ®±à ¬Ñ®±ÏÙÝÆÌÍ ¬ ¬°±Å®±
(79) ÝÆ ÐÎÎ ¿¬ Â Ï ÊÎή±¯ÒÅ®±ÏÙ ÝÆáÐ.
(80) 126 . Gardner & Lambert (1972)
(81)
(82)
(83) ¡¢£¤ ¥ ¦¥ § ¨ © ª«¬® ¬¯ §°£ °± ²¯ §¥³ ´ µ¶·¸ ¹ º »¡¢
(84) ¢¯³¯ ¢´©££¤²¥¼ ½¾ ¿ ° ÀÁ©
(85) ¦§¨Â©ª² Ellis(1985)°©ÃÄ¥¨ÂÅÆ °ÇÈÉ« ȬÀÁ° ÊÉË . . ¯Ì ®¯ ÍÎÏ° Ð Ñ Ò ÓÔÕֱϰ Рѣ®¯ .
(86) 127 .
(87)
(88)
(89)
(90) . ¡¢£¤ ¥¦§¨©ª «¨©¬®¯¥¯¥© ° ¥
(91) ± . ¡¢£¤ ¥¦§¨©ª «¨©¬®¯¥¯¥© ¥ ±² ±
(92) ¤³ ´µ ¶· ¸ ¹º»± ¼ ½¾¿ ¸« Gardner and Lambert(1972)ÀÁÂõ . Ä (Likert scale)¡ ¢£ ¤¥
(93) ¦Å§¥
(94) ¨§©Æ´µª « ÇÈ¥ 2 Likert
(95)
(96) ¡¢£¤¥¦§¨©ª«¬®¤¯©°± ®² ³¤¡´µ¶µ·¸ ³¹º»´µ¶¼½¸ ·½¾.
(97) 128 . ⾰⚕ߩା㗬ᕈߣᅷᒰᕈ
(98)
(99) . Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha . ቇ⠌⠪ߩ⢛᥊⊛ᖱႎ ᕈ㧦Ԙ↵غԙغᅚ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 (Cronbach's Alpha)
(100) .
(101) 129 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(102) . . . . ቱᄢቇߪ ੱୃޔᐔᛛⴚቇ㒮ߪ ੱߢࠆޕ
(103) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(104) . . . . ੑᐕ↢ߪ ੱ ޔᐕ↢ߪ ੱ ޔᐕ↢ߪ ੱ৻ޔᐕ↢ߪ ੱߢ ࠆޕ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(105) . . ᣣ⚻ ߒߪ ੱޔᣣ⚻ ࠅߪ ੱߢࠆޕ.
(106) 130 .
(107) . SPSS for Windows .
(108)
(109)
(110) . .
(111) . . . . . . . . . . ¡¢ . . £¤¥¦ §¨©ª« . . ¬®¯°± . . ² ³´±µ¶ . . ² ·¸ . . ¹º»¼½ . . . . ² ¾¿ÀÁÂÃÀ¡ÄÅÆÇÈ»É 4
(112) ¡ 5 ¢£¤¥¦§¨©¢£ª«¬®¯ °±²³´§¨µ ¶·¸¹º»¼§¨½¾ .
(113) 131 .
(114)
(115) . . . .
(116)
(117) . .
(118) . . ¡ ¢ £ ¤ . . ¥ ¦ §¦¨ . . ¡ ¢©ª . . «¬® . . ¥ ¯°±² . . ³ . . ¥ ´µ ¶ . . · . . ¸¹º»¼
(119) . . °½¾
(120) . . ¿ÀÁ³ÂÃ Ä . . ÅÆ ÇÈÉÊ . . Ë ½Ì¨ . . ÍÎÏ ÐÑÒÓ . . ¡ ¯° ÔÕΤ . . Ö×ØÙÚÙÛÙÜÝÞ . . ¢ßà . . áâã . .
(121) 132 .
(122) . .
(123) . ¡ ¢£ ¤¥ ¦§
(124) ¨
(125) ©¥ ª«¬®¯° ±²³
(126) ´ª. µ ±²³ ¶ µ ±² ³ ³¶· ¸ ¹ µ¨ µº³¡ » ¶·© ¼½¾±² ¿ ¦§
(127) ¨ À§Á³ Â. à ¹ ĵ ¡ © ŵ
(128) ¨ ±³¿À ±ÆÇÈ É º³Ê˲ §Ì ÍÎÏʨ ² À§ ¿³
(129) ¨Ð ÑÒÓÓÔÓÕ ² ÑÒÓÓÔÓÕ
(130) ²¦§
(131) ¨ À§ Ö× ØÙ ¡§ Ú ÛÜ Ý² .
(132) 133 .
(133) .
(134) . . . Levene . .
(135) . .
(136) . .
(137) . .
(138) . .
(139) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(140)
(141) . 6
(142) .
(143) 134 . . Levene . . . . . .
(144)
(145) . .
(146) . . .
(147) . . .
(148) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(149)
(150)
(151)
(152) .
(153) 135 . .
(154) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ߦࠃࠆߣ ╙ޔ࿃ ߩ ⊛⊒ ޟะ╙ߣޠ࿃ ߩޟᣣᧄߎ߇ࠇߦޠ ᗧߥ ᕈ߇ࠄࠇߚ ᕈ 㧕ޕ. .
(155) 136 . Levene . . .
(156) . .
(157) . . .
(158) . . .
(159) . . .
(160) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(161)
(162)
(163)
(164)
(165) .
(166) 137 .
(167) . .
(168) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(169) ࠄߣ߽߃ߥቇ↢߇ ߢࠆޕ.
(170) . .
(171) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ߦࠃࠆߣ߁ߘ߽ߡߣޔᕁ߁ߣߘ߁ᕁ߁ቇ↢߇วࠊߖߡ ߢޔ ߤ ࠄߣ߽߃ߥቇ↢߇ ߢࠆޕ.
(172) 138 .
(173)
(174) . ᰴᢙ. ߣߡ߽ߘ߁ᕁ߁. 㧑. ലߥ㧑. ⚥Ⓧ㧑. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ߹ߞߚߊߘ߁ᕁࠊߥ. . . . . ή࿁╵. . . . . . . . . ߘ߁ᕁ߁ ߤߜࠄߣ߽߃ߥ ߘ߁ᕁࠊߥ. ว⸘. ߦࠃࠆߣ߁ߘ߽ߡߣޔᕁ߁ߣߘ߁ᕁ߁ቇ↢߇วࠊߖߡ ߢޔ ߤ ࠄߣ߽߃ߥቇ↢߇ ߢࠆޕ
(175) ߣߡ߽ߘ߁ᕁ߁. ᰴᢙ. 㧑. ലߥ㧑. ⚥Ⓧ㧑. . . . . ߘ߁ᕁ߁. . . . . ߤߜࠄߣ߽߃ߥ. . . . . . . . . ోߊߘ߁ᕁࠊߥ. . . . . ή࿁╵. . . . . . . ߘ߁ᕁࠊߥ. ว⸘. . ߦࠃࠆߣ߁ߘ߽ߡߣޔᕁ߁ߣߘ߁ᕁ߁ቇ↢߇วࠊߖߡ ߢޔ ߤ ࠄߣ߽߃ߥቇ↢߇ ߢࠆޕ.
(176) 139 .
(177)
(178) . .
(179) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ߦࠃࠆߣ߁ߘ߽ߡߣޔᕁ߁ߣߘ߁ᕁ߁ቇ↢߇วࠊߖߡ ߢޔ ߤ ࠄߣ߽߃ߥቇ↢߇ ߢࠆޕ .
(180) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ߦࠃࠆߣ߁ߘ߽ߡߣޔᕁ߁ߣߘ߁ᕁ߁ቇ↢߇วࠊߖߡ ߢޔ ߤ ࠄߣ߽߃ߥቇ↢߇ ߢࠆޕ.
(181) 140 .
(182)
(183) . . ᰴᢙ. ߣߡ߽ߘ߁ᕁ߁. 㧑. ᢁߥ㧑. ⚥Ⓧ㧑. . . . . ߘ߁ᕁ߁. . . . . ߤߜࠄߣ߽߃ߥ. . . . . . . . . ߹ߞߚߊߘ߁ᕁࠊߥ. . . . . ή࿁╵. . . . . . . ߘ߁ᕁࠊߥ. ว⸘. .
(184)
(185) .
(186)
(187) . ߣߡ߽ߘ߁ᕁ߁. ᰴᢙ. 㧑. ലߥ㧑. ⚥Ⓧ㧑. . . . . ߘ߁ᕁ߁. . . . . ߤߜࠄߣ߽߃ߥ. . . . . . . . . ߹ߞߚߊߘ߁ᕁࠊߥ. . . . . ή࿁╵. . . . . . . ߘ߁ᕁࠊߥ. ว⸘. .
(188) .
(189) 141 .
(190)
(191) .
(192) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(193) . .
(194) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(195) .
(196) 142 . . . . .
(197) . .
(198) . . .
(199) . . ® .
(200) . . .
(201) . . .
(202) . . .
(203) . . . ¡¢£ ¤¥
(204) . . . ¦ §¨©ª«¢¢¬® ¢
(205) . . . ¯ °±
(206) . . .
(207)
(208) .
(209) 143 .
(210)
(211)
(212)
(213) Gardner
(214)
(215)
(216)
(217)
(218) ¡¢ £ Gardner and Lambert (1959)¤
(219) ¥¥¦
(220) § ¨¢ ©ª « Oxford and Shearin (1994) ¬® ¯ °± ²¤¬ ³´ §µ ¬¤¬ ¶
(221)
(222)
(223)
(224) °± « ¬¢ ¦ ·
(225) ® ² ¸ (curiosity and interest) ¹¯º (identification with the model) » ¡¼(interaction with peers) ¢½ ¾¸
(226)
(227) ¿ ¢
(228) ¢ ¹¯º À ¤
(229) £Á ¿ Á ¬¤
(230) £Â.
(231) 144 .
(232) ࡙㧙࡚ ࿑ ㊄㌛㈽ ╬
(233) Deci¡¢ ¡ £ N ¤ ¥¦£ ¤ ¦ §¨ ©ª« ¬ᄸ¥¥ §¨ £㧞 ¤¦ ࡕ࠺®¯° ±² ³ ³´ ⍮µ ⍮¶ ¤¦ ·¸ £㧟 ¤ ¦£㧠 ¤ ¦ ´ §¨°
(234) ° ¹ §¨º » ¤ ¦ ·¸ §¨ㅧ²ᰴ « ¡ 㧦 ¤ ¥ ¦ ¤ ¦ ¼½ ¾ ¤ ¦¼ ¡ 㧦¤ ¦¼¤ ¦¼¡ ¤¦. ¤¦§¨ ᅤ ᒻ¿ . §¨Ꮻ ÀÁ±²¶·ÂÃÄž╬ Æ Ç¸ ÈÉ
(235) Ê ¿ Ëਇ ÊÈÉ⺖Ì¡ §¨ ÍÎÏÐ¯Ñ ᒻ §¨§¨ ÒÓ¡Ô§¨⛮⛯ Ô ォ²¿Õ Ǹ §¨ §¨ᡰ¸ ·¸ ¡ ¡.
(236) 145 .
(237)
(238) .
(239)
(240)
(241)
(242)
(243)
(244)
(245) Ellis (1985)¡
(246) ¢£¤¥¦§¨©ª«¬® ¯°
(247) ±²¬ ¤¥ ¤¥³ ´ ¤µ´¥¶ª«·¸¹º»©¬®¼ ª«¸¹ ½ ¤¥¾¬¿ÀÁ
(248) Â
(249) ¤¥¦§ ¥¶ÃÂĪ«´ÅÆ¥¸¹ º¥¶ ¼ ©Ç¥¦ Èɵʧ ¯Á ËÌ ¤Í ÄÎ ÇÏÐ § ËÂÑÀ ¤
(250) § ÌÒÌ ¤ Ó§ .
(251) 146 .
(252)
(253)
(254)
(255)
(256)
(257) .
(258)
(259)
(260) . ¡ ¢£¤ ¥¦§ ¨©ª¦§ ¨« ¬®¯°¬ ± ² ± ³´µ ± ³¶ ±
(261) ·¸¹ º¨¶»µ
(262) ¼ ½¾¿¥Àº³¬¨. Á¨¨Ã·¼
(263) ¡ ¼Ä½ ÅÅÆÅ¿
(264)
(265) ¡¨ ÂÃ
(266) Å £Ç¨ . È
(267) É Ä³º ÊËÌͲ ¨ ΠŠϨ¨¶ £Ç¨ÅШ ÐÑÒ Ó½
(268) ´´ ϨÔÕÖ×ØÙÚÛܺÝ. º Ä
(269) ¬ £º
(270) ۻè
(271) ¨ º
(272) Þ¨ .
(273) 147 .
(274)
(275)
(276) ¡¢ .
(277) 148 . Crookes ,G.,and Schmidt,R.W. Motivation Reopening the research agenda. Language learning, 41 (1991): 469-512. Deci,E.L. Intrinsic motivation. New York:Plenum Press. (1975)
(278) Dornyei,Z. Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Longmam. (2001) Ellis,R. Understanding Second Language Acquisition .Oxford University Press.(1985) Ellis,R. Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press. (1997) Gardner, R.,and Lambert,W. Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology.13 (1959): 266-272. Gardner, R.,and Lambert,W. Attitudes and Motivation in second language learning. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House (1972): 132 Gardner,R.,and Macintyre, P. An instrumental motivation in language study: who says it isn`t effective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.13 (1991): 57-72. Horwitz,E. Attending to the affective domain in foreign language learning In S.S.Magnan(Ed). Shifting the instructional focus to the learner (1990): 15-33. Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Language. Lukmani,Y. Motivation to learn and language proficiency. Language Learning. 22 (1972): 261-273. McGroaty, “M. Situating second language motivation”, In Z. Dornyei and R. Schimidt (eds.), Motivation and Second Language Acquisition, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center (2001): 69-90. Oxford, R., and Shearin, J., Language Learning Motivation: Expanding the Theoretical Framework, Modern Language Journal 78:1 (1994), 12-28. Reilly, M. Accessing Achievement in theLearner-Centered Curriculum. Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Center. (1994).
(279)
(280) .
(281) .
(282) 149 .
(283) .
(284)
(285) .
(286)
(287) ¡ ¡ ¢£¤£¥
(288) ¦ §¨ ¨ ¨ ©ª « ¬® ¯¬¯° ±² ³´«µ ¶±² · · ¯¸¬¹ º » ¼ ½ » · ¾ ¿À¯ Á Âì¬Ä ·¼·¼Å ¿ ¬¹ ºÆ.
(289) 150 . .
(290)
相關文件
Middle school transition stress: Links with academic performance, motivation, and school experience.. Self-Concept
e-Learning activities that support the teaching of Reading Courseware platforms for Reading Comprehension.. Practise downloading eBooks
Cost-Sensitive Multiclass Classification CSMC Motivation and
Random Forest: Theory and Practice Neural Network Motivation.. Neural Network Hypothesis Neural Network Training Deep
Network behavior of university students has internet addiction factor, data collection factor, entertainment media factor, affection.. communication factor, and online
Its basic principle is to regard selecting or do not selecting a feature as a two-level independent factor; the parameters of SVM as continuous noise factors; the accuracy of the
Keywords: Financial and Insurance Industry, Work Motivation, Work Pressure, Job Satisfaction, Organizational
(計畫名稱/Title of the Project) 提升學習動機與解決實務問題能力於實用課程之研究- 以交通工程課程為例/A Study on the Promotion of Learning Motivation and Practical
