國立交通大學
生物科技學系
博士論文
霍氏格里蒙菌熱穩定性溶血素造成活體
內外肝臟毒性的探討
Thermostable direct hemolysin from
Grimontia hollisae causes in vitro and in vivo
hepatotoxicity
研究生:林晏任
Student: Yan-Ren Lin
指導教授:吳東昆 博士
Advisor: Prof. Tung-Kung Wu Ph.D
霍氏格里蒙菌熱穩定性溶血素造成活體
內外肝臟毒性的探討
Thermostable direct hemolysin from Grimontia
hollisae causes in vitro and in vivo hepatotoxicity
研究生:林晏任 Student: Yan-Ren Lin
指導教授:吳東昆 博士 Advisor: Prof. Tung-Kung Wu Ph.D
國立交通大學
生物科技學系
博士論文
A Dissertation
Submitted to Institute of Biological Science and Technology,
National Chiao Tung University,
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of Doctor of Biological Science and Technology Hsinchu,
Taiwan, Republic of China
Feb, 2013
i
摘要
霍氏格里蒙菌(G. hollisae)已經被證實會產生熱穩定性溶血素(Gh-TDH)。以往的 研究指出此毒素在人體會經由腸胃吸收,造成消化道的傷害,尤其在小腸是格外 劇烈。然而,熱穩定性溶血素除了會在小腸吸收外,更有可能經由門脈循環(portal system)的靜脈回流侵犯肝臟造成二次傷害,但此關係卻從未被研究過。在本研究中,我們將進行熱穩定性溶血素造成活體內外肝臟毒性(in vitro and in vivo
hepatotoxicity)的探討。我們使用純化的 G. hollisae recombinant thermostable direct
hemolysin (Gh-rTDH) 來進行 肝 毒性 的分析 。在活 體外 培養老鼠 肝 臟細胞株
(FL83B cell line)和人類正常肝臟細胞(primary human liver cell)來測試此毒素後發
現,此毒素對老鼠和人類的肝臟細胞均造成劇烈的傷害。在接觸此毒素後,肝臟
細胞出現細胞質流失和皺縮等(loss of cell cytoplasm with cell shrinkage)型態上的
改變,並且最終造成細胞死亡。細胞毒性測試(MTT assay)的結果顯示當毒素濃
度超過 10-6μg/ml 則開始顯著造成肝細胞死亡,作用時間越長或毒素的濃度越高,
則毒殺肝細胞的作用就更為明顯(dose and time dependent)。Gh-rTDH 在結合異硫
氰酸螢光素(fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated)之後被用來定位細胞受侵犯的
部位,我們發現此毒素起初會圍繞肝細胞,最後將進入細胞內並且侵犯細胞核造
成細胞死亡。另外,在活體內的實驗中,我們讓若干數量的小鼠(BALB/c)口服單
次且不同劑量的熱穩定性溶血素或霍氏格里蒙菌,並且進行抽血分析以評估其肝
ii
glutamic-pyruvic transaminase) 、 膽 紅 素 (bilirubin) 、 白 蛋 白 (albumin) 、 球 蛋 白
(globulin)在餵食毒素或細菌後均發生顯著異常,肝臟酵素在餵食後第八小時上升
至最高峰。病理切片則證實無論是餵食毒素或直接餵食細菌,在肝臟的門脈周圍
區域(periportal area)皆會遭受明顯的破壞,毒素或細菌的濃度越高,破壞越大。
除此之外,此毒素對於心臟、腎臟並沒有造成顯著的傷害。最後,我們使用正子
照影18
F-FDG PET (positron emission tomography)/CT (computer tomography) scan
來活體評估老鼠在餵食毒素或細菌前後之肝臟代謝功能及復原情形。結果發現老
鼠在餵食毒素或細菌後,其代謝功能有顯著下降,並且在七天後可逐漸回復其功
能。總結來說,本研究首次證實霍氏格里蒙菌之熱穩定性溶血素的確具有活體內
外之肝臟毒性,肝臟的門脈周圍區域是此毒素主要的侵犯部位,肝臟代謝功能可
iii
Abstract
G. hollisae thermostable direct hemolysin (Gh-TDH) is produced by most strains of G.
hollisae. This toxin has been reported to be absorbed in the intestines in humans. In
addition to being absorbed by the intestine, TDH may also cause secondary injury to
the liver via effects on the venous return of the portal system. However, a relationship
between the TDH and the liver has not been reported or analyzed. In this study, we
analyzed the hepatotoxicity of TDH in vivo and in vitro to provide insights into the
acute injury and recovery stages of THD-induced hepatotoxicity in living animals.
Liver cells (primary human non-cancer cell and FL83B mouse cells) were treated and
mice (BALB/c) were fed with this toxin to investigate its hepatotoxicity. In this study,
G. hollisae recombinant thermostable direct hemolysin (Gh-rTDH) was purified for
further analysis. Morphological examination and cytotoxicity assays using liver cells
were also performed. The morphological changes included cell detachment and a loss
of cell cytoplasm with cell shrinkage. The MTT assay revealed that the cytoviability
of liver cells decreased in proportion to the concentration of Gh-rTDH over different
treatment durations (dose and time dependent.). Moreover, we noted that Gh-rTDH
damaged liver cells in vitro when the concentration of Gh-rTDH exceeded 10-6μg/ml.
Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated toxin was used to analyze the localization of
iv
located around the cellular margins and subsequently entered the nucleus. Mice were
subjected to liver function measurements and liver biopsies following toxin treatment
and wild-type bacterial infection. Liver function measurements and liver biopsies of
the mice following treatment with toxin or infection with wild-type Grimontia
hollisae showed elevated levels of transaminases and damage to the periportal area,
respectively. PET (positron emission tomography)/CT (computed tomography)
images were taken to assess liver metabolism during acute injury and recovery. The
PET/CT images revealed that the reconstruction of the liver continued for at least one
week after exposure to a single dose of the toxin or bacterial infection. In conclusion,
the hepatotoxicity of Gh-TDH was firstly demonstrated. The damage was located in
v
誌謝 (Acknowledgement)
從一位急診臨床醫師跨入生物科技這個有點熟悉但又相當
陌生的領域當中。起初雖因反覆實驗失敗而充滿徬徨,但過
程中我仍學習到許多基礎科學的知識、實驗的方法,最重要
的是嚴謹的實驗態度。首先要感謝我的指導教授吳東昆老師,
體諒我在職的身分,並在此基礎與臨床結合的題目上,給予
解惑及最大的協助鼓勵。再來要感謝生科所的諸位學長姐、
學弟妹的幫忙,尤其是裕國、文亮、聖慈、宜芳的全心的付
出與大力的支持,如果沒有你們幫忙,整個過程是無法獨自
完成的。感謝光田醫院核醫團隊對於動物影像實驗的幫忙與
指導。最後,感謝彰化基督教醫院、交大應化諸位長官、師
長的支持與照顧,與一路相伴的家人,你們都是我堅強的後
盾,謝謝大家。
vi
TABLE OF CONTENT
摘要……….…………..……….i ABSTRACT………..………..……….….iii 致謝………....v TABLE OF FIGURES………..ix LIST OF TABLES……….…….x 1. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION………..………11.1 Vibrio species caused diseases throughout the world………...………1
1.2 Grimontia hollisae cause diseases in human………3
1.3 Thermostable direct hemolysin was a violence factor……….….…...….4
1.4 Research summary…...8
2. CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS………..…...10
2.1 Bacterial strains and materials……….…...…10
2.2 Molecular cloning, protein expression and purification, and characterization of G. hollisae recombinant thermostable direct hemolysin (Gh-rTDH)…...10
2.3 Protein electrophoresis, detection and confirmed by MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometry………...….12
2.4 Analyzed the in vitro hepatotoxicity of Gh-rTDH………..13
2.4.1 Cytoviability and morphological examination of Gh-rTDH treated human liver cell and FL83B cells………..………..13
2.4.2 Cytoviability assay………..……….…...…14
2.4.3 Confocal microscopy……….…..…….14
2.4.4 TUNEL assay ………...………..….……15
2.5 Analyzed the in vivo hepatotoxicity of Gh-rTDH………15
2.5.1 BALB/c served as an in vivo model………...…..15
2.5.2 Withdraw blood for analyzing the liver functions………..…..16
2.5.3 Withdraw blood for analyzing the cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity……..17
vii
2.5.5 18F-FDG PET/CT scan………..…..…...…..18 2.6 Infection models –In vivo hepatotoxicity of the G. hollisae strain, Escherichia
coli containing the recombinant Gh-tdh gene (E. coli-TOPO-tdh), and the E. coli-TOPO strain in BALB/c mice………...21
2.7 Analyzed the in vivo and in vitro hepatotoxicity of fiber from Gh-rTDH…...…22 3. CHAPTER 3 RESULTS……….…24
3.1 Identification of the Gh-rTDH purified from G. hollisae………...…….24 3.2 Gh-rTDH caused in vitro liver cell damage……….26
3.2.1 Gh-rTDH-FITC bound the margin of liver cells and invaded their
nucleuses………..29 3.2.2 Gh-rTDH caused liver cells death by cell apoptosis………....31
3.3 Liver damages in vivo were induced by Gh-rTDH………..34 3.3.1 Acute hemolytic status in vivo was caused by Gh-rTDH…….………...….36
3.3.2 Gh-rTDH damaged the functions of albumin synthesis in liver and triggered immune system………38 3.3.3 Gh-rTDH might not cause in vitro cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity…….38
3.3.4 Liver biopsy demonstrate that the damages located in the periportal area of liver……….…..39 3.3.5 Decrease and recovery in metabolism of livers in living animals evaluated
by 18F-FDG PET/CT scan….………...42 3.4 Fiber form of Gh-rTDH did not cause in vivo and in vitro hepatotoxicity.……..50
3.5 G. hollisae and E. coli-TOPO-tdh but not E. coli-TOPO causes in vivo
hepatotoxicity………..………...53
3.5.1 Liver damages in vivo were induced by G. hollisae and E.
coli-TOPO-tdh………..53 3.5.2 Decrease and recovery in metabolism of livers in mice evaluated by
18
F-FDG PET/CT scan………...……..53
3.5.3 Liver biopsy demonstrates that the damages were located in the periportal area of the liver……….……..……..54
viii
4. CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION……….……62 5. CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES…………...…..67
5.1 Analyze the relationships between chronic liver diseases and TDH...67 6. CHAPTER 6 EFERENCES………...72
ix
List of Figures
Figure 1 Influence of water temperature on the concentration of V. vulnificus in Gulf
Coast oyster meats………..………3
Figure 2 TDH from V. parahaemolyticus damaged the intestine……….….5
Figure 3 Model of heat-induced conformational change of TDH……….6
Figure 4 TDH might not only be absorbed by intestine but also probably caused secondary injury to the liver via venous return of portal system……….……..8
Figure 5 The parameters in analyzing the in vitro hepatotoxicity of TDH from G. hollisae. Mouse and human liver cell served as an in vitro model………..…...9
Figure 6 The parameters in analyzing the in vivo hepatotoxicity of TDH from G. hollisae and G. hollisae. BALB/c served as an in vivo model…..………….…….…...9
Figure 7 18F-FDG and Isoflurane were treated to each mouse before scan started….20 Figure 8 Purification and characterization of the Gh-rTDH protein………..24
Figure 9 Tandem mass spectrum of the doubly charged tryptic peptide at m/z 1024.543 from SDS-PAGE of Gh-rTDH………..………...26
Figure 10 The morphology of liver cells (FL83B) was clearly changed after the administration of 1 μg/ml Gh-rTDH for 24 hours at 37 °C………..27
Figure 11 The MTT assay of mouse liver cells……….……..28
Figure 12 The MTT assay of human liver cells………..…...…..29
Figure 13 Subcellular localization of Gh-rTDH………..………....…30
Figure 14 The liver cells were administrated with 1μg/ml of Gh-rTDH for 24 hours and performed with TUNEL assay were observed by confocal microscopy………...32
Figure 15 In the control group, the liver cells were administrated with PBS for 24 hours and performed with TUNEL assay was observed by confocal microscopy…...33
Figure 16 Liver function evaluation after a single administration of Gh-rTDH..…...35
Figure 17 Gh-rTDH induces an acute hemolytic status……….…….…37
Figure 18 Gh-rTDH might not cause cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity…….……...39
Figure 19 Liver biopsy demonstrate that the damages located in the periportal area of liver……….….….41
Figure 20 Low levels of 18F-FDG uptake could be noted in mice fed with different dosages of Gh-rTDH and shock state was noted………..46
Figure 21 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for mice treated with Gh-rTDH……...…….…….47
Figure 22 In the mice fed with Gh-rTDH for 8 hours, they were administrated for 0.07 mCi 18F-FDG by tail vein injection and images taking were performed……….50
x
administration of fiber form of Gh-rTDH………51
Figure 24 The pathological images of liver parenchyma which obtained from liver
biopsy in mice were observed by microscopy at 200X magnification……….52
Figure 25 E. coli-TOPO did not cause abnormal liver functions………55 Figure 26 Acute liver injury could be noted in mice fed with G. hollisae……….….56 Figure 27 Acute liver injury could be noted in mice fed with E. coli-TOPO-tdh…...57 Figure 28 18F-FDG uptakes in livers were obviously decreased in the mice fed with G. hollisae……….………58
Figure 29 18F-FDG uptakes in livers were obviously decreased in the mice fed with E. coli-TOPO-tdh……….…….………58
Figure 30 E. coli-TOPO did not cause obvious liver injury. .……….………59 Figure 31 The ratios of liver/muscle 18F-FDG uptake levels in mice fed with
bacteria……….60
Figure 32 Liver biopsy (tissue harvested at the time of animal sacrifice) following
bacterial infection……….…61
Figure 33 Oysters are the major seafood productions of Lu-Kung and Wang Kong in
central Taiwan………..69
Figure 34 Each patient is suggested to receive the examination of liver ultrasound in
our cooperative EDs after exposure to TDH for 1, 42, 178 and 365 days…………...71
List of Table
Table 1 Vibrio species implicated as causes of human disease and number of deaths
1
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Vibrio species caused diseases throughout the world
Diseases caused by different Vibrio species have been observed in large
populations throughout the world, particularly in Asia, the United States, and
Africa.(1-3) V. cholera and V. parahaemolyticus are the major etiological agents of
Vibriosis, which is associated with the ingestion of raw, undercooked, or contaminated
seafood (1, 2) Grimontia hollisae (previously named V. hollisae) has been frequently
reported to cause diseases in humans, including severe gastroenteritis, hypovolemia,
and septicemia following the consumption of shellfish or oysters.(4-6) Vibrio species
that are associated with human illness are listed in Table 1, together with Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data on the number of reported cases and
deaths in the United States. Previous studies reported that during warm summer
months, virtually 100% of oysters will carry V. vulnificus and/or Vibrio
parahaemolyticus (Figure 1); densities in US Gulf Coast oysters often exceed 104
organisms/g of oyster meat. Although Vibrios do not appear to affect oysters, some
species may be pathogenic to marine life.(1, 7, 8) Although V. parahaemolyticus has
always been recognized as an important enteropathogen and cause human diseases.
2
1990s. This increase has been noted in multiple countries, including Japan and the
United States, and appears to be associated with the appearance of a new clonal group
with pandemic potential.(1, 9)
Table 1 Vibrio species implicated as causes of human disease and number of deaths
associated with infection with these species.(1)
NOTE:++, Most common clinical presentation; +, neither rare nor most common
clinical presentation; (+), rare clinical presentation. aData reflect Vibrio infections
reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention during 1999. Data are
from the 24 states that reported cases; for many of these states, reporting of Vibrio
3
Data were kindly provided by R. Tauxe, US Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Atlanta. bData include 4 cases associated with foreign travel. cThe 31
reported deaths are from a group of 75 cases for which data on death were available.
Figure 1 Influence of water temperature on the concentration of V. vulnificus in Gulf
Coast oyster meats. Each point represents the geometric mean of all observations
recorded within a 3°C temperature range.(8)
1.2 Grimontia hollisae cause diseases in human
G. hollisae (had ever been named V. hollisae) was recently and more frequently
4
septicemia after the consumption of shellfish and oysters.(1, 4-6, 10) G. hollisae was
ever a species of Vibrio and was firstly reported by Hickman et al.(11) Moreover,
Thompson et al. reported that V. hollisae strains (GenBank/EMBL accession nos
AJ514909-AJ514911) shared 99.5 % 16S rDNA sequence similarity, but had only
94.6 % similarity to their closest phylogenetic neighbor, EnteroVibrio norvegicus. 16S
rDNA sequence similarity of V. hollisae and Vibrio cholerae was only 91 %.
Therefore, these results suggest that V. hollisae should be placed into a novel genus as
G. hollisae.(12)This organism is reported to not usually grow on TCBS agar or
Mac-Conkey agar but does grow well on sheep blood agar and marine agar.(13)
However, the mechanism of morbidity caused by G. hollisae had not been well
addressed. Although some specific laboratory examinations have been shown to be
the way to detect G. hollisae but the incidence was still highly suspected to be
underestimated because of the detecting techniques were not very popular throughout
the world.(11, 13, 14)
1.3 Thermostable direct hemolysin was a violence factor
Thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH) was well known as a toxin constituted of
165 amino acid residues and which performed a variety of biological activities
5
Figure 2 TDH from V. parahaemolyticus damaged the intestine. (1) PBS was treated
to the intestine of rabbit and did not cause damages. (2) TDH from V.
parahaemolyticus damaged the intestine where lumens suffered edema and
hemorrhage.(15)
Some previous study reported that TDH is detoxified by aggregation into fibrils
after being heated at 60-70 °C, which can be reversibly refolded into the toxic native
form by being rapidly cooled after unfolding at higher temperatures (Figure 3).(16,
6
Figure 3 Model of heat-induced conformational change of TDH. Rapid heating and
cooling (A) slow heating and cooling (B).(16) TDHn: native TDH; TDHu: unfolded
TDH; TDHi: intermediate of TDH with fibrillar structure
The hemolytic activity of TDH is suppressed by the addition of Congo red, a
dye known to be sensitive to amyloid fibrils.(16, 17) These findings support the idea
that the conformational change in TDH, with the increase in β-sheet content, in a cellular membrane, may be associated with its cytotoxicity. The toxin effects of TDH
had been identified from a variety of Vibrio species, including V. cholera non-O1, V.
parahaemolyticus, V. mimicus, V. alginolyticus, and G. hollisae.(18-22) Among them,
the production of TDHs were reported to present with similar thd gene sequences and
7
but not in other Vibrio species.(18) In addition, the lipophilic effect of Gh-TDH is still
not clearly discussed in current reports. The toxic effects of TDH have been reported
to be mainly localized to the intestinal portion of gastrointestinal (15, 17, 24).
However, a relationship between TDH and the liver has not been reported or analyzed.
TDH might not only be absorbed by the intestine but may also cause secondary injury
to the liver via effects on the venous return of the portal system. In this study, we
aimed to analyze the hepatotoxicity of TDH using in vivo and in vitro analyses and to
provide evidence regarding the acute injury and recovery stages of THD-induced
8
1.4 Research summary
Previous studies emphasized the toxin effect of TDH mainly located in the
intestine of gastrointestinal tract.(15) However; the relationships between TDH and
liver had not been reported or analyzed. TDH might not only be absorbed by intestine
but also probably caused secondary injury to the liver via venous return of portal
system (Figure 4). In this study, we aim to analyze the hepatotoxicity of TDH and G.
hollisae (toxin and infection model) by in vitro (Figure 5) and in vitro (Figure 6)
analyses and provide an evidence to report the acute injury and recover stages of liver
in living animals by 18F-FDG PET (positron emission tomography)/CT (computer
tomography) scan.
Figure 4 TDH might not only be absorbed by intestine but also probably caused
secondary injury to the liver via venous return of portal system.
Seafood
hollisae
G.
TDH
Intestine
Portal
9
Figure 5 The parameters in analyzing the in vitro hepatotoxicity of TDH from G.
hollisae. Mouse and human liver cell served as an in vitro model.
Figure 6 The parameters in analyzing the in vivo hepatotoxicity of TDH from G.
hollisae and G. hollisae. BALB/c served as an in vivo model.
Morphological examination Cytoviability assay Confocal microscopy
The reason of cell death
Analyze the liver functions via withdraw
blood Analyze the cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity Liver biopsy 18F-FDG PET/CT scan
10
Chapter 2 Materials and Methods
2.1 Bacterial strains and materials
The G. hollisae strain ATCC 33564 was obtained in a freeze-dried form from
the Culture Collection and Research Center (Hsin-Chu, Taiwan). Phenyl Sepharose 6
Fast Flow and protein molecular weight standards were purchased from GE
Healthcare (Piscataway, NJ). The protein assay kits were obtained from Bio-Rad
(Hercules, CA). Protein purification chemicals were obtained from Calbiochem (La
Jolla, CA).
2.2 Molecular cloning, protein expression and purification, and characterization of G. hollisae recombinant thermostable direct hemolysin (Gh-rTDH)
The G. hollisae tdh gene was obtained via PCR using G. hollisae genomic DNA
as the template and two primers, YKW-hol-TDH-N1
(5’-ATGAAATACAGACATCT-3’) and YKW-hol-TDH-C1
(5’-TTATTGTTGAGATTCAC-3’). PCR reaction was carried out under the following
conditions: denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at
94 °C for 15 s, annealing at 58 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min
followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The amplified DNA fragment was
11
recombinant plasmid pCR2.1®-TOPO-Gh-tdh. The recombinant plasmid was
sequenced using an ABI PRISM® 3100 Genetic analyzer according to the
manufacturer’s protocol (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
The pCR2.1-TOPO-Gh-tdh plasmid harboring the tdh gene was transformed
into Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)(pLysS) cells (Promega, Madison, WI) for
recombinant protein production and purification. In parallel, the pCR2.1-TOPO
plasmid was used as a negative control. Colonies were inoculated into Luria-Bertani
broth supplemented 50 g/mL kanamycin and grown for 16 hours at 37 °C. The cells
were harvested by centrifugation at 6,000 x g for 30 min, and then resuspended in 40
mL of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7) buffer. The mixture was sonicated, and the cell debris
was removed by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 30 min at 4 °C. Purification method
was according to a previously described method.25 Overall, the supernatant containing
produced Gh-rTDH protein was loaded on a Phenyl-Sepharose 6 Fast Flow column
pre-equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7) and eluted with a linear 0 to 50%
ethylene glycol gradient. Fractions exhibiting hemolysis were pooled, dialyzed, and
added with NaCl to a 200 mM concentration. The active sample was applied to a
Phenyl-Sepharose 6 Fast Flow column with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7) and then eluted
with 4 void volumes of a step gradient consisting of 200, 100, 50 mM NaCl and 20
12
Tris-HCl buffer and the Gh-rTDH was dialyzed against 0.1M PBS buffer (Na2HPO4,
NaH2PO4, NaCl, pH 7.1) at 4°C overnight for cell and animal experiments. The
molecular cloning, protein expression, and purification of Gh-rTDH were performed
according to previous reports (17, 24). The effect of endotoxin has been excluded
before the experiment started. In this study, the endotoxin contamination had been
excluded during protein preparation by the method of anion-exchange
chromatography using diethylaminoethane (DEAE) chromatographic matrices.(25, 26)
Other prevention strategies including staff education (the use of aseptic technique,
understanding the nature of contamination, and good housekeeping), and sterility tests
were routinely performed before the study started.
2.3 Protein electrophoresis, detection and confirmed by MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometry
For sodium dodecylacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), the protein
sample was mixed with 5 x sample treatment buffer (125 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2%
SDS, 10% glycerol, 5%-merceptoethanol, and 0.05% bromophenol blue), and heated
at 100 °C for 10 min. Electrophoresis was performed according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. After electrophoresis, the gel was soaked in Coomassie Blue R 250
13
(40% methanol, 7% acetic acid) and II (5% methanol, 7% acetic acid) until the stained
band was distinct against a clear background. The protein identities of SDS-PAGE
bands corresponding to Gh-rTDH were confirmed by MALDI-TOF/TOF mass
spectrometry.
2.4 Analyzed the in vitro hepatotoxicity of Gh-rTDH
2.41 Cytoviability and morphological examination of Gh-rTDH treated human liver
cell and FL83B cells
FL83B (BCRC 60325) and primary human non-cancer cell (kindly provided by
the Liver Transplantation Center of one medical center in central Taiwan; IRB number:
120305) were cultured for use in these studies. Following attachment, the cells were
treated with Gh-rTDH at a concentration of 1 μg/ml for 24 hours at 37 °C; the treating dose was determined according to the initial results of the IC50 determination (1 μg/ml,
obtained from MTT assay). Images of the experimental group, cellular morphology
were recorded microscopically at 4 time points (before Gh-rTDH exposure and after
exposure to Gh-rTDH for 8, 16, and 24 hours). In addition, cells treated with PBS
(mixed with culture medium) were served as control group, they were also observed
at the same time points with the experimental group. All experimental or control
14
2.42 Cytoviability assay
Cytoviability of human liver cell and FL83B cells were measured by the MTT
assay using 4 treatment durations (12, 16, 24 and 48 hours). In the MTT assay, cells
were treated with PBS as control groups and treated with Gh-rTDH at different
concentrations (10to 10-8 μg/ml mixed with culture medium and administered in a total volume of 250 μl). For control group, the same concentration of vehicle was added to the culture medium. After culture for different treating durations (12hours,
16hours, 24hours and 48hours), cells were incubated with MTT for another 4 hours at
37°C. Overall, the medium was removed and DMSO was added into each well. The
absorbance of the samples was measured at 570 nm using a microtiter plate reader. All
experiments were performed independently for five times
2.43 Confocal microscopy
Confocal microscopy was used to investigate the locations where Gh-rTDH
invaded in liver cells. Gh-rTDH was conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanat (FITC)
(emission 488nm, green) as Gh-rTDH-FITC and the reactions were performed using
the FluoReporter FITC Protein Labeling Kit (molecular probes) according to the
15
cells/well) and incubated in the culture medium to attach. After cells were attached,
they were treated with 10 μg/ml of Gh-rTDH-FITC mixed with culture medium for 20 and 40 min in darkness. Subsequently, the cells were washed 3 times using PBS
(SIGMA) buffer and they were also stained with propidium iodide (PI) (SIGMA)
(emission 650 nm, red) with working solution 5mg/ml in PBS for 5 min in darkness.
Finally, the cells were washed 3 times using PBS buffer and observed at 26 °C by confocal microscopy (Olympus FV300).
2.44 TUNEL assay
TUNEL assay was performed for analyzing the reason of cell death. FL83B
cells were respectively administrated with 1 μg/ml of Gh-rTDH for 24 hours and PBS (control group) and the result of TUNEL assay according to the manufacturer’s
protocol (ApoAlert® DNA Fragmentation Assay Kit) and were observed by confocal
microscopy (Olympus FV300).
2.5 Analyzed the in vivo hepatotoxicity of Gh-rTDH
2.51 BALB/c served as an in vivo model
A total of 114 female mice aged 6 weeks were obtained from the National
16
All mice were fed normal diets. This study was carried out in strict accordance with
the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the
National Institutes of Health. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the
Ethics of Animal Experiments of the National Chiao Tung University (Permit
Number: 01001008). All surgery was performed under sodium pentobarbital
anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.
2.52 Withdraw blood for analyzing the liver functions (n=25)
Twenty-five mice were divided into 5 groups (n = 5 for each group). One group
served as a control group and was administered PBS; the other 4 groups were
administered different dosages of Gh-rTDH (0.1, 1, 10, and 100 μg) as a single treatment. The dosage that might initiate organ injury in animals has never been
reported (information on natural infection in humans is also lacking). Therefore, the
treatment dosages were carefully determined and modified according to the initial
results of the IC50 determination (1 μg/ml, obtained from the MTT assay described
above). All mice were treated using the same volume (200 μl), the same treatment time (10:00 am) and via gastric tubes without volume loss (i.e., vomiting). One
hundred microliters of whole blood was withdrawn from the orbital vascular plexus of
17
sampling times: before treatment with PBS or Gh-rTDH and 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 and
256 hours after treatment with PBS or Gh-rTDH. The blood samples were analyzed
for the continuation of liver function as assessed by glutamic-oxaloacetic
transaminase (GOT), glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (GPT), total/direct/indirect
bilirubin, albumin and globulin)(Reagents Beckman Coulter®). One-way ANOVA
analysis was used to analyze the significant differences between each treatments/time
point. All analyses were performed with the SPSS statistical package for Windows
(Version 15.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
2.53 Withdraw blood for analyzing the cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity (n=20)
Twenty mice were divided into 4 groups (each n=5). One of the 4 groups was
served as control group which were fed with PBS and the other 3 groups were
respectively fed with Gh-rTDH in dosages of 1 μg, 10 μg and 100 μg in single administration via gastric tubes (each mouse was fed at AM10:00 with total volumes
of 200 μl). Each mouse was also respectively withdrawn 100 μl of whole blood at the 5 different time points: (1) before feeding with PBS or Gh-rTDH; (2) after feeding
with PBS or Gh-rTDH for 4, 16, 64, and 256 hours. Their blood samples were
analyzed for nephrotoxicity by detecting the level of creatinine (Assay kit: Creatinine
18
for cardiotoxicity by detecting the levels of CK-MB (Assay kit: CK-MB Reagent
Pack, Beckman Coulter®; Supply: Beckman Coulter Synchron CX7 Analyzer) and
Troponin I (Assay kit: ADVIA Centaur TnI-Ultra Readypack®; Supply: Bayer ADVIA
Centaur). Above all, blood samples were diluted appropriately for enough volume to
be detected by analyzers and were operated according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
One-way ANOVA analysis was also used to analyze the significant differences
between each treatments/time point.
2.54 Liver biopsy (n=9)
Nine mice were divided into 3 groups, which were treated with PBS, 10 μg of Gh-rTDH or 100 μg of Gh-rTDH (n = 3 in each group) in a single administration via a gastric tube. All mice had their livers biopsied after 8 hours of treatment. Samples
were prepared with H&E staining from tissue harvested at the time of animal
sacrifice.
2.55 PET/CT scan (n=60)
In this study, the 18F-FDG (2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose) PET /CT scan was
used to take images in detection the liver cells metabolism in living animals after
19
ST). 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging provides precise fusion of molecular PET images
with high-quality anatomical CT images. Technical parameters used for CT portion of
PET/CT are designed as follow: CT scan type with helical full of 0.5 second, a
detector row configuration of 16x1.25mm, an interval space of 2.5 mm, the slice
thickness of 1.2 mm, pitchof 1.75:1 (high quality mode), a speed of 17.5mm per
rotation, scan FOV of large, voltage of 120 kVp and current of 200 mA. Technical
parameters used for PET portion of 18F-FDG PET/CT are designed as follow 10 min
in each bed, the FOV chosen for imaging reconstruction is 20 cm and PET resolution
is 4.5 mm FWHM. The reconstructive parameters are type 3D iteration.
Sixty mice were divided into 4 major groups and each group (n=15) was respectively
fed with PBS, 1 μg, 10 μg and 100 μg of Gh-rTDH in single administration via gastric tubes. Among each group, mice were further grouped to receive 18F-FDG PET/CT
scan in different time points including the 8th (n=5), 72th (n=5) and 168th (n=5) hours
after feeding with Gh-rTDH. In the study, 0.07mCi 18F-FDG for each mouse was
given by tail vein injection before taking the image (Figure 7A). After injection the
18
F-FDG, images taking were performed one hour later with appropriate general
anesthesia (Isoflurane) (Figure 7B-D). In our study, each mouse did not be proposed
to receive 18F-FDG PET/CT scan in every time points to follow up because of
20
influence the results of this study. In the 18F-FDG PET/CT images, the 18F-FDG
uptake value was calculated using region of interest (ROI). In each mouse, the ROIs
of liver and muscle were recorded for semi-quantification which was proposed to be
the ratios of liver/muscle 18F-FDG uptake level.
Figure 7 18F-FDG and Isoflurane were treated to each mouse before scan started. (A)
18
21
Isoflurane was used to perform general anesthesia. (C) Mice were respectively lay
down on the box and (D) received 18F-FDG PET/CT scan.
2.6 Infection models –In vivo hepatotoxicity of the G. hollisae strain, Escherichia coli containing the recombinant Gh-tdh gene (E. coli-TOPO-tdh), and the E.
coli-TOPO strain in BALB/c mice (n=126).
An animal infection model was set up to demonstrate the hepatotoxicity of
bacterial infection. The G. hollisae strain (wild type), E. coli-TOPO-tdh, and E.
coli-TOPO strains were cultured. Seventy-five mice were divided into three major
groups (n=25 for each group) and infected with bacteria via oral administration. Two
groups were infected with G. hollisae and E. coli-TOPO-tdh to demonstrate their
hepatotoxicity; the third group was infected with E. coli-TOPO to serve as a control
group. For each major group, five subgroups were established (n=5 for each group)
according to their treatment dosage (107, 108, 109, 1010 and 1011 organisms/ml and
treated with the same volumes. One hundred microliters of whole blood was
withdrawn at 8 different time points: before treatment with bacteria and 4, 8, 16, 32,
64, 128 and 256 hours after treatment with bacteria. Blood samples were analyzed for
continued liver function (GOT, GPT, total bilirubin, albumin and globulin). In
22
and E. coli-TOPO (n=2 for each group). For these animals, liver biopsies and H&E
staining (200X) were performed 8 hours after bacterial treatment. Finally, 54 mice
were treated with G. hollisae, E. coli-TOPO-tdh and E. coli-TOPO (n=18 for each
group) with a single administration. Among each group, mice were sub-grouped for
treatment with bacteria at the concentrations of 107, 109 and 1011 organisms/ml (n=6
for each group). In each concentration group, mice received a PET/CT scan at 8, 72
and 168 hours (n=2 for each group) after bacterial treatment.
2.7 Analyzed the in vivo and in vitro hepatotoxicity of fiber from Gh-rTDH (n=34)
In this study, fiber form of Gh-rTDH was prepared by heat treatment at 60 °C,
and the aggregates were collected by centrifugation. The method of preparing fiber
form of Gh-rTDH was according to a previously described method.(16) The
productions of fiber form of Gh-rTDH were confirmed by testing their hemolytic
ability. FL83B cells were treating with fiber form of Gh-rTDH and morphological
examination and cytoviability assay were performed (procedures and conditions were
uniform with previous description in the method section of 2.4). Moreover, mice
(n=25) were also fed with fiber form of Gh-rTDH and their liver functions including
23
biopsy and pathological images were taken in mice (n=8) for further analyzing the
hepatotoxicity of mice (procedures and conditions were uniform with previous
24
Chapter 3 Results
3.1 Identification of the Gh-rTDH purified from G. hollisae
Electrophoresis of the homogeneous protein revealed a molecular mass of ~ 22
kDa as determined by the SDS-PAGE (Figure 8). Moreover, we found that tandem
mass spectrum of the doubly charged tryptic peptide at m/z 1024.543 from
SDS-PAGE of Gh-rTDH and a unique hit matching the 35VSDFWTNR42 of Gh-rTDH
peptide sequence was identified from the mass differences in the y-fragment ion series
25
Figure 8 Purification and characterization of the Gh-rTDH protein. (A) Coomassie
blue-stained SDS-PAGE of Gh-rTDH protein. Marker proteins (M): phosphorylase b
(97 kDa), albumin (66 kDa), ovalbumin (45 kDa), carbonic anhydrase (30 kDa),
trypsin inhibitor (20 kDa), α-lactoalbumin (14 kDa); lane 1: cell crude extract of BL21(DE3) pLysS strain containing pCR2.1-TOPO plasmid alone; lane 2: crude
protein expressed from BL21(DE3) pLysS strain containing pCR2.1-TOPO-Gh-tdh
gene; lane 3 and 4: Phenyl Sepharose 6 Fast Flow purified protein showed a
26
Figure 9 Tandem mass spectrum of the doubly charged tryptic peptide at m/z
1024.543 from SDS-PAGE of Gh-rTDH. A unique hit matching the 35VSDFWTNR42
of Gh-rTDH peptide sequence was identified from the mass differences in the
y-fragment ion series of MALDI TOF/TOF spectrum.
3.2 Gh-rTDH caused in vitro liver cell damage
The morphology of liver cells was obviously changed after administrating with
1 μg/ml Gh-rTDH for 24 hours at 37 °C. The morphological changes included cell detachment, and loss of cell cytoplasm with cell shrinkage (Figure 10A-D). The MTT
assay also revealed that the cytoviability of liver cells decreased in proportion to the
concentrations of Gh-rTDH in different treating durations. Moreover, we noted that
the Gh-rTDH damaged the liver cells in vitro when the concentration of Gh-rTDH
crossed 10-6 μg/ml (Figure 11). Moreover, in this study, primary human hepatocytes
(non-cancer liver cells) were used to demonstrate the toxicity of Gh-TDH via MTT
assay. These primary human hepatocytes were kindly provided by the liver
transplantation center of a medical center in central Taiwan under IRB permission
(IRB number: 120305). In this MTT assay, the Gh-TDH still caused obvious
27
Figure 10 The morphology of liver cells (FL83B) was clearly changed after the
administration of 1 μg/ml Gh-rTDH for 24 hours at 37 °C. The morphological changes included cell detachment and a loss of cell cytoplasm with cell shrinkage;
they were the same cells recorded in different time points. (A) The liver cells before
exposure and (B) after exposure to the Gh-rTDH protein for 8 hours, (C) for 16 hours
28
Figure 11 The MTT assay of mouse liver cells. The MTT assay revealed that the
cytoviability of mouse liver cells decreased in proportion to the concentration of
Gh-rTDH over different treatment durations. Moreover, we noted that Gh-rTDH
damaged liver cells in vitro when the concentration of Gh-rTDH exceeded 10-6 μg/ml.
29
Figure 12 The MTT assay of human liver cells. The MTT assay revealed that the
cytoviability of primary human hepatocytes (non-cancer liver cells) decreased in
proportion to the concentration of Gh-rTDH over different treatment durations.
Moreover, we noted that Gh-rTDH damaged liver cells in vitro when the
concentration of Gh-rTDH exceeded 10-8μg/ml.
3.21 Gh-rTDH-FITC bound the margin of liver cells and invaded their nucleuses
Gh-rTDH-FITC was used to demonstrate the locations where the protein
invaded. The confocal microscopy with FITC filter revealed that Gh-rTDH-FITC
bound around the margin of liver cells after administrating with 10 μg/ml Gh-rTDH-FITC for 20 min at 26 °C (Figure 13 A-C). Moreover, Gh-rTDH-FITC further located in the nucleus of liver cell after treating with Gh-rTDH-FITC for 40
30
min at 26 °C and PI was also stained for confirming the location of nucleus (Figure 13 D-F).
Figure 13 Subcellular localization of Gh-rTDH. The liver cells respectively
administrated with 10 μg/ml Gh-rTDH-FITC for 20 (A-C) and for 40 (D-F) min at 26 °C and were observed by confocal microscopy. (A) The liver cells were observed without FICT filter (B) with FITC filter (C) merge A and C confirmed that
31
liver cell was invaded by Gh-rTDH-FITC (green) (E) nucleus stained with PI (red) (F)
merge of D and E confirmed that Gh-rTDH-FITC was located in the nucleus of liver
cell.
3.22 Gh-rTDH caused liver cells death by cell apoptosis
After treating liver cells with 1 μg/ml of Gh-rTDH for 24 hours, TUNEL assay was performed and positive findings were noted. DNA fragmentations could be noted
in the cytoplasm of cells (Figure 14 A-D). In the control group, TUNEL assay was
32
Figure 14 The liver cells were administrated with 1 μg/ml of Gh-rTDH for 24 hours
and performed with TUNEL assay were observed by confocal microscopy. (A)
TUNEL positive, (B) stained with PI, (C) merge of A and B, (D) merge of C and
33
Figure 15 In the control group, the liver cells were administrated with PBS for 24
hours and performed with TUNEL assay was observed by confocal microscopy. (A)
34
3.3 Liver damages in vivo were induced by Gh-rTDH
The levels of GOT and GPT were not elevated in the control group after the
administration of a single dose of PBS. However, the mean GOT and GPT levels were
clearly elevated in the group that was treated with 0.1 μg Gh-rTDH, and the highest levels were observed 8 hr after toxin administration. Similar findings were observed
in other treatment groups. Higher doses of Gh-rTDH were clearly associated with
35
Figure 16 Liver function evaluation after a single administration of Gh-rTDH. The
levels of liver function were abnormal after a single administration of Gh-rTDH.
36
(0.1, 1, 10, and 100 μg), and the control group was treated with PBS (n = 5 for each group). Acute liver injury was demonstrated by elevating the levels of (A) GPT and
(B) GOT; the highest levels could be found at the 8th hr after feeding in both. (C)
Hyperbilirubinemia and (D) hypoalbuminemia also occurred in the mice that were
treated with Gh-rTDH. The hyperbilirubinemia was the most severe at the 8th hr, and
hypoalbuminemia was noted after 32 hr of treatment with Gh-rTDH. (E) Globulin
levels were gradually increased after exposure to Gh-rTDH. *A p-value < 0.05 was
considered statistically significant.
3.31 Acute hemolytic status in vivo was caused by Gh-rTDH
In addition, the total bilirubin level did not change in the control group (Figure
16 C) the distributions of bilirubin were similar in different time points after exposure
with PBS (Figure 17 A). However, in the groups fed with Gh-rTDH, their total
bilirubin levels were obviously elevated and the higher dosage of Gh-rTDH made the
levels of total bilirubin higher (Figure 17 C). Moreover, the proportions of indirect
from bilirubin were much higher than the direct from of bilirubin within 8 hours after
exposure with Gh-rTDH in the dosages of 1 μg and 100 μg (Figure 17 B and C). According to our findings, the acute hemolytic status in vivo could be induced by
37
Figure 17 Gh-rTDH induces an acute hemolytic status. The distribution of direct and
indirect bilirubin in mice that were fed with (A) PBS (control), (B) 1 μg of Gh-rTDH, or (C) 100 μg of Gh-rTDH. The percentages of indirect form of bilirubin were similar in different time points after exposure to PBS. In mice fed with 1 μg and 100 μg of Gh-rTDH, the percentages of indirect form of bilirubin both obviously increased in
the 4th hour and gradually subsided. This result indicated that the Gh-rTDH caused
acute hemolytic status in vivo and the severity associated with the feeding dosages of
38
3.32 Gh-rTDH damaged the functions of albumin synthesis in liver and triggered
immune system
The albumin levels began to decrease after feeding with Gh-rTDH for 32 hours
and were in proportion to the feeding dosages. Moreover, in the groups fed with
Gh-rTDH, their albumin levels progressively decreased and which did not recover
even in the 256th hour (Figure 16 D). These results indicated that in the mice fed with
Gh-rTDH, their functions of albumin synthesis were damaged and were difficult to
recover in the initial 256 hours after exposure to Gh-rTDH. In addition, the globulin
levels were higher in groups fed with Gh-rTDH than in control group. This finding
indicated that Gh-rTDH might trigger immune system in circulation (Figure 16 E).
3.33 Gh-rTDH might not cause in vitro cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity.
The creatinine and CK-MB levels which significantly and clinically reflected
the kidney and heart injury were both not elevated in the groups fed with Gh-rTDH.
The levels of creatinine and CK-MB did not change in proportion to the feeding
dosages of Gh-rTDH. Moreover, the Troponin I levels were also normal in all mice
39
Figure 18 Gh-rTDH might not cause cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity.
Cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity were surveyed by withdrawing blood. Mice were
respectively fed with three different dosages of Gh-rTDH (1 μg, 10 μg and 100 μg) and control group was fed with PBS (each group n=5). Their levels of (A) creatinine
and (B) CK-MB were both normal in the serum of mice after single exposure to
Gh-rTDH.
3.34 Liver biopsy demonstrate that the damages located in the periportal area of
40
In the control group, the liver biopsy was performed and normal liver
parenchyma without pathological change was noted (Figure 19 A and B). However, in
mice fed with 10 μg of Gh-rTDH, the liver biopsy demonstrated the preserved liver parenchyma architecture with mild congestion over the periportal areas at the low
power magnification, and spotty liver cells damage around the portal vein at the high
power magnification. These damages were obviously located in the periportal area
(zone 1 of the liver acinus) (Figure 19 C and D). Moreover, in mice fed with 100 μg of Gh-rTDH, severe congestion with hemorrhage were noted at the low power
magnification and high power magnification revealed that confluent injury of liver
cells with intracytoplasmic acidophilic and ballooning change and nuclear pyknosis.
The periportal area damages of liver were more severe in mice fed with 100 μg than in mice fed with 10 μg of Gh-rTDH (Figure 19 E and F). Otherwise, the similar findings could be noted in each mice group received liver biopsy (each group n=3).
Therefore, these findings demonstrated that Gh-rTDH drained from the portal vein
41
42
liver. The pathological images of liver parenchyma which obtained from liver biopsy
in mice, were observed by microscopy at low power magnification -100X (A)(C)(E)
and at high power magnification- 400X (B)(D)(F). In the mice fed with PBS (control
groups), (A) the parenchyma were homogenous and health, (B) liver cells around
portal vein were not damaged. In the mice fed with 10 μg of Gh-rTDH, (C) the parenchyma were mild congestive over the periportal areas and (D) the spotty
damages could be noted in liver cells around the portal vein. In the mice fed with 100
μg of Gh-rTDH, (E) the parenchyma were severe congestive with hemorrhage around the periportal areas and (F) most of the liver cells around the portal vein were
damaged, these cells revealed that confluent injury of liver cells with intracytoplasmic
acidophilic and ballooning change and nuclear pyknosis. Above all, these images
demonstrated that the Gh-rTDH was absorbed by intestine and caused secondary
injury to the liver via venous return of portal system.
P: portal vein, Arrows: the damaged liver cells
3.35 Decrease and recovery in metabolism of livers in living animals evaluated by
PET/CT scan
In the mice fed with Gh-rTDH, the levels of 18F-FDG uptake were decreased
43
color light in merge images indicated that 18F-FDG was uptake by cells. General
lower level of 18F-FDG uptake could be noted in mice fed with higher dosage with
Gh-rTDH and shock state complicated with multiple organ failure was highly
suspected (Figure 20A-I). The level of 18F-FDG uptake in liver was further surveyed
in cross section images. In our study, each mouse had three series of images including
CT, PET and merge of CT and PET after receiving PET/CT scan (Figure 21A). We
found that in the mouse fed with Gh-rTDH, their 18F-FDG uptake in liver were
obviously fewer than in mouse fed with PBS, and their decreases were in proportion
to the dosages of Gh-rTDH (Figure 21B). Moreover, we also noted that the ratios of
liver/muscle 18F-FDG uptake level were obviously decreased in the 8th hour after
feeding with Gh-rTDH and the severity was dose-dependent. In addition, the ratios of
liver/muscle 18F-FDG uptake level recovered to the normal range and even crossed
the normal range in the 72th and 168th hour after feeding with Gh-rTDH, respectively.
These results indicated that the metabolisms of livers exposed to Gh-rTDH were
initially decreased and the recovery continued at least for one week after single
exposure of toxin (Figure 21C). The severities of organ damages were provided by
18
F-FDG PET/CT scan in the mice fed with Gh-rTDH for 8 hours. Intestine and liver
were both the major organs damaged by feeding with different dosages of Gh-rTDH
47
Figure 20 Low levels of 18F-FDG uptake could be noted in mice fed with different dosages of Gh-rTDH and shock state was noted. All mice had 3 series of images
including (A)(D)(G) CT, (B)(E)(H) PET and (C)(F)(I) merge of CT and PET. In the
8th (A-C), 72th (D-F) and 168th (G-I) hours after feeding with Gh-rTDH, the general
uptake of 18F-FDG were all decreased in proportion to the dosages of Gh-rTDH. Mice
in control group were fed with PBS.
Figure 21 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for mice treated with Gh-rTDH. Mice were administrated for 0.07 mCi 18F-FDG by tail vein injection and images taking were
48
performed 1 hour later. (A) All mice had 3 series of images including CT, PET and
merge of CT and PET. The location of liver was labeled as a dotted line where the
cross section images were obtained. (B) These images were cross section of livers. In
the 8th, 72th and 168th hours after feeding with Gh-rTDH, the uptake of 18F-FDG in
livers were all decreased in proportion to the dosages of Gh-rTDH. (C) The 18F-FDG
uptake value was calculated using ROI in each mouse (total n=60); the ROIs of liver
and muscle were recorded for semi-quantification in the groups fed with PBS
(control), 1 μg, 10 μg and 100 μg of Gh-rTDH (each group n=15, and each group were equally divided into 3 groups in different time points: 8th (n=5), 72th (n=5) and
168th (n=5) hours). The ratios of liver/muscle 18F-FDG uptake level were much fewer
in mice fed with Gh-rTDH than in those fed with PBS within the initial 8 hour.
Moreover, the levels returned and crossed to the normal range in the 72th hour and
50
Figure 22 In the mice fed with Gh-rTDH for 8 hours, they were administrated for
0.07 mCi 18F-FDG by tail vein injection and images taking were performed. The
severities of organ damages were provided by 18F-FDG PET/CT scan. Intestine and
liver were both the major organs damaged by feeding with (A) 1 μg; (B) 10 μg and (C) 100 μg of Gh-rTDH and the damages were also dose-dependent.
3.4 Fiber form of Gh-rTDH did not cause in vivo and in vitro hepatotoxicity
The fiber form of Gh-rTDH did not have hemolytic activity in our study. Cell
morphology did not change after exposure to fiber form of Gh-rTDH for 24 hours and
MTT assay revealed that the cytoviability of FL83B cells also did not decrease after
treating fiber form of Gh-rTDH in different dosage and treating durations. In mice fed
with fiber form of Gh-rTDH their liver function tests were normal (Figure 23A-E) and
51
Figure 23 The levels of liver functions were normal in the serum of mice after single
administration of fiber form of Gh-rTDH. Six-week-old female BALB\c were
52
10 μg and 100 μg) and control group were fed with PBS (each group n=5). The levels of (A) GPT and (B) GOT did not elevate. (C) Hyperbilirubinemia and (D)
hypoalbumenia were not occurred. (E) The levels of globulin were not increased after
exposure to Gh-rTDH.
Figure 24 The pathological images of liver parenchyma which obtained from liver
biopsy in mice were observed by microscopy at 200X magnification. In the mice fed
53
liver cells around portal vein were not damaged. Similar finding were noted in the
mice fed with (B) 10 and (C) 100 μg of fiber form of Gh-rTDH. Above all, fiver form of Gh-rTDH did not cause periportal area damages in liver. P: portal vein
3.5 G. hollisae and E. coli-TOPO-tdh but not E. coli-TOPO causes in vivo hepatotoxicity
3.51 Liver damages in vivo were induced by G. hollisae and E. coli-TOPO-tdh.
In the control group, the GOT and GPT level did not elevate after feeding them
with a single dosage of E. coli-TOPO (Figure 25). However, in the group fed with G.
hollisae (Figure 26) and E. coli-TOPO-tdh (Figure 27), the mean GOT and GPT
levels were obviously elevated and the highest levels could both be respectively found
in the 16th hour and 8th hour after feeding with bacteria. Higher concentrations of
bacteria are clearly associated with higher levels of GOT and GPT, which clinically
indicate more severe liver injury in mice. Acute hemolytic status, poor functions of
albumin synthesis and more triggered immune system could be noted in the mice fed
with G. hollisae and E. coli-TOPO-tdh. These patterns were similar with mice directly
fed with toxin (Gh-rTDH).
54
PET/CT scan.
We found that in the mice fed with G. hollisae (Figure 28) and E.
coli-TOPO-tdh (Figure 29), 18F-FDG uptakes in their livers were obviously fewer
than in mice fed with E. coli-TOPO (Figure 30), and their decreases were in
proportion to the amount of bacteria. Moreover, we also noted that the ratios of
liver/muscle 18F-FDG uptake levels decreased in the 8th hour after feeding with G.
hollisae and E. coli-TOPO-tdh. Among them, the ratios of liver/muscle 18F-FDG
uptake levels recovered in the 72th and 168th hour, respectively (Figure 31A and B).
Moreover, E. coli-TOPO did not cause significant liver injuries (Figure 31C).
3.53 Liver biopsy demonstrates that the damages were located in the periportal area
of the liver.
In mice fed with G. hollisae, the liver biopsy demonstrated obvious cell
damages over the periportal areas (Figure 32A). Spotty liver cell damages around the
portal vein were noted in mice fed with E. coli-TOPO-tdh (Figure 32B). Finally, in
the mice fed with E. coli-TOPO, there was no pathological damage in liver
55
Figure 25 E. coli-TOPO did not cause abnormal liver functions. In the control group,
the GOT and GPT level did not elevate after feeding them with a single dosage of E.
56
Figure 26 Acute liver injury could be noted in mice fed with G. hollisae. GOT/GPT
levels were obviously elevated and the highest levels could both be respectively found
57
Figure 27 Acute liver injury could be noted in mice fed with E. coli-TOPO-tdh.
GOT/GPT levels were also obviously elevated and the highest levels could both be
respectively found in the 16th hour and 8th hour after feeding with bacteria. This
58
Figure 28 18F-FDG uptakes in livers were obviously decreased in the mice fed with G. hollisae. The decreases were in proportion to the amount of bacteria.
Figure 29 18F-FDG uptakes in livers were obviously decreased in the mice fed with E. coli-TOPO-tdh. The decreases were in proportion to the amount of bacteria.
59
Figure 30 E. coli-TOPO did not cause obvious liver injury. The uptakes of 18F-FDG were not decreased.
60
Figure 31 The ratios of liver/muscle 18F-FDG uptake levels in mice fed with bacteria. The ratios of liver/muscle 18F-FDG uptake levels recovered in the 72th and 168th hour,
61
respectively (A and B). Moreover, E. coli-TOPO did not cause significant liver
injuries (C).
Figure 32 Liver biopsy (tissue harvested at the time of animal sacrifice) following
bacterial infection. In mice fed with G. hollisae, the liver biopsy demonstrated
obvious cell damages over the periportal areas (A). Spotty liver cell damages around
the portal vein were noted in mice fed with E. coli-TOPO-tdh (B). Finally, in the mice
62
Chapter 4 Discussion
In this study, liver cells were firstly treated with G. hollisae TDH and the in
vitro hepatotoxicity was demonstrated by direst observation and MTT assay. The
hepatotoxicity caused by Gh-TDH was both dose- and time-dependent. Very low
concentration of TDH (> 10-6 μg/ml) damaged the liver cells. We also noted that the
MTT assays yielded a similar pattern over 12, 16, 24, and 48 hr under different toxin
concentrations. One possible explanation is that when the concentration of toxin
increased, cells were not only killed by this toxin but also probably suffered cell
division suppression. Therefore, when we prolonged the treatment durations, the
number of surviving cells did not clearly differ between the 4 time points. Naim et al.
reported that V. parahaemolyticus TDH caused Rat-1 cells injury and the TDH might
induce cytotoxicity by acting inside the cells.(27) In our study, we noted that the
Gh-rTDH-FITC invaded inside of liver cells via binding around the margin of cell and
further located in their nucleus in short time. Therefore, the destructions caused by G.
hollisae TDH were quite quick and lethal in liver cells.
Morros et al. firstly reported a patient suffered G. hollisae infection and
presented with liver cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy in 1982.(28) Some previous
studies demonstrated that the symptoms of patients with Vibrio species infections
63
However, the evidence of hepatotoxicity caused by G. hollisae TDH had never been
provided. In this study, we found that the GOT and GPT levels of mice fed with
Gh-rTDH were obviously increased and acute liver injury were highly suspected.
Muscle injury was not favored as the major reason for the elevation of GOT/GPT, as a
18
F-FDG PET/CT scan did not show muscle injury. Moreover, the liver biopsy
revealed that the periportal areas of liver were damaged and their severity associated
with the dosage of Gh-rTDH. The functions of periportal area in liver were well
known as oxidative energy metabolism of fatty and amino acids, glucose release and
glycogen formation, ammonia detoxification, protective metabolism, and the
synthesis of albumin.(29-31) Therefore, mice with periportal area injury caused by
Gh-rTDH might also suffer some complications including malnutrition, protective
system destruction, hepatic encephalopathy and hypoalbumenia. Clinically, the
hypoalbumenia could be induced by decreased (hepatic) production or increased loss
(gut tract loss). The result of hypoalbumenia in this study might be influenced by both
mechanisms. The globulin levels also increased as the protective systems of the livers
were damaged and the toxin triggered their immune systems in the circulation.
Overall, the evidence of hypoalbumenia could be provided in our mice fed with
Gh-rTDH and in whom their globulin levels also increased because of their protective
64
TDH was well known as having a strong hemolytic activity in vitro.(14, 23, 32,
33) However, the in vivo hemolysis caused by TDH had not been well provided. The
acute hemolytic status in vivo results in acute anemia, which would exacerbate tissue
hypoxia and organ hypoperfusion. Therefore, septicemia caused by Vibrio species
with the tdh gene might be more critical than that caused by the Vibrio species
without the tdh gene. Clinically, the hepatotoxicity might be caused via hemolysis.
However, the pathological findings revealed that the hepatic injury was mainly
located at the periportal areas, and the injury was not diffused. It is suspected that the
major etiology is toxin absorption and injury to the liver via the venous return of the
portal system.
Clinical PET/CT scan had been reported as an excellent tool to survey tumor and
organ metabolism in small animals.(34) Damages of liver caused by Gh-rTDH could
be demonstrated by blood withdrawal and liver biopsy. However, the conditions of
recovery and organ metabolism in living animals were difficult to be analyzed.
Therefore, 18F-FDG PET/CT scan was performed in our assessment. We noted that the
uptake of 18F-FDG in the livers decreased in proportion to the feeding dosages of
Gh-rTDH, which indicated that the damages of livers in living animals were
dose-dependent. After single exposure to Gh-rTDH, the uptake of 18F-FDG gradually