The Study on the Learning Differences of Junior High School Students in Rural and Urban Area of Changhua
李坤章、賴瓊琦
E-mail: 9707847@mail.dyu.edu.tw
ABSTRACT
In order to reduce the differences between rural area as well as towns and make up some students from cultural disadvantaged areas by many supplementary measures. Compared with students from towns, others from faraway areas are generally considered to be cultural deprivation and short of competitiveness owing to fewer classes. Thus the scores of the high school entrance examination have been bad basically. In Taiwan the transportation is very convenient, the qualities of teachers are average and the information dissemination is very fast at present. What kinds of differences on learning between students from faraway areas and towns make learning achievement have different results? This research mainly is to discuss differences between middle-school students from faraway areas and towns during learning process, and understand how these factors of difference on learning affect learning achievement.Students from faraway areas and towns in Changhua had the questionnaire survey. The researches of questionnaire were divided into two parts: basic data and attitude scale. The family background data includes the occupation of parents, the family economic condition and the socioeconomic status; moreover, reviewing time and going to cram schools or not.The topics of attitude scale on questionnaire were divided into five parts: First, the factor of student mood; Second, understanding learning and
metacognition; Third, attitude of getting along with teachers; Fourth, the factor of getting along with classmates; Fifth, the factor of family process. After analyzing and compiling statistics, this study discovered that it had had obvious differences between
middle-school students from faraway areas and towns during learning process. It included if going to cram school after school, the length of supplementary time and family factors; such as: care and participation of parents. Thus all of differences came out obviously. Based on the above conclusions, the further suggestions will be given according to family factors of students as well as the secondary education implementation of faraway middle schools. Furthermore, this subject will be deeply researched in the future.
Keywords : learning achievement ; rural areas ; learning differences Table of Contents
第一章 緒論...01 第一節 研究背景...01 第二節 研究動機與目
的...03 第三節 研究架構與流程...06 第四節 研究範圍與限制...07 第五 節 名詞釋義...09 第二章 文獻探討...10 第一節 相關理論與研
究...10 第二節 影響學生學習的學理基礎...14 第三章 研究設計與實施...22 第一節 現況分析...22 第二節 研究設計...29 2.1問卷設
計...29 2.2研究對象...32 2.3量化分析工具...32 第四章 實 施與結果 34 第五章 結論與建議 171 參考文獻 176 附錄 178 【附錄一】學生學習差異問卷題目 178
REFERENCES
1. 王文科，王智弘編譯（2002）。McMillan, Sally Schumacher著。質的教育研究:概念分析。台北市:師大書苑。 2. 王克難譯(2003)
。Alexander Sutherland Neill著。夏山學校 台北市:遠流。 3. 李駱遜（2002）。「教室中的隱形人」:被忽略幼兒的研究。幼兒教育年刊
，14，91-112。 4. 吳麗娟(1987) 讓我們更快樂。台北:心理。 5. 吳國淳譯(1996)。家庭環境與學校學習。台北:五南。 6. 吳美枝、何禮恩 譯（2001）。Jean McNiff，Pamela Lomax，Jack Whitehead著。行動研究:生活實踐家的研究錦囊。嘉義市:濤石文化。 7. 林清江（1981）
。社會教育學新論—我國社會與教育關係之研究。台北市:五南。 8. 林惠真等合著（1999）。海闊天空開放教育，教師篇:開放教育與教 師進修。台北市:國際村。 9. 周新富(2006)。家庭教育學－社會學取向。台北市:五南。 10.胡秉正(1973)。教育心理學。台北:三民。 11.胡 龍騰 潘中道 黃瑋瑩譯(2000)。Ranjit Kumar 著。研究方法:步驟化學習指南。台北:學富文化。 12.張春興(1994)。教育心理學－三化取向 的理論與實踐。台北:東華。 13.張淑美(1994)。不同地區教育機會差異之探討。國立高雄師範大學學報 ,5 , 87–110。 14.徐澄清(1998)。
社會化過程的重要機轉-同儕互動。健康世界，145，10-14。 15.郭俊賢,陳淑惠譯 (1998)。Linda Campbell, Bruce Campbell, Dee Dickinson 著。多元智慧的教與學。台北市:遠流。 16.黃政傑編譯(1989)。讓孩子完全學習—布魯姆論教育。台北:師大書苑。 17.黃淑玲 (1995)。國 民中小學學生人際關係、學業成就與自我觀念相關之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。 18.黃鴻文(2003)。國民中學學生文化 之民族誌研究。台北:學富文化。 19.葉肅科(2004)。社會心理學。台北:洪葉文化。 20.劉慶仁（2005）。美國新世紀教育改革。台北: 心
理。 21.翟本瑞 (2002)。家庭文化資本對學校教育影響之研究:以農業縣山區小學為例。教育與社會研究，4，181-195。
