270
1 1
1
/
NT WF WR
( P-A ) NT-WF NT-WR WF-WR
P-A T-test
P-A T-test
p 0.016
P-A T-test p 0.06
( Frucius Lycii ) ( Cortex Lycii ) ( Blood sugar level )
1-2
3
( L y c i u m Chinese Mill. )
4-5
6
1. 250 mg/dl 2.
HbA1c 9% 3. 4.
a. ( Cr. 1.5 ) b. ( AMI )
c. ( CVA )
A D L - 2 ( ) d .
35 ( ) 100 300 cc
(
70 gm 240 cc )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
37 9 28
22-65 40.3±11.4
- Normal none taken ( NNT ) 36
- Normal with fruit ( NWF ) 34
- Normal with root ( NWR ) 30
36 20 16
34-79 59.1±12.4
- D M none taken ( DMNT ) 33
- DM with fruit ( DMWF ) 32
- DM with root ( DMWR ) 30
( P-A ) = -
324 361 mg/dl
250 mg/dl 253
2 5 5 m g / d l
283 mg/dl
(N) 37 (NNT) 36 36
(NWF) 34 34
(NWR) 30 30
(DM) 36 (DMNT) 33 2 31
(DMWF) 32 2 30 (DMWR) 30 1 29
T-test
P-A
( )
T-test
/
NNT 66-117 mg/dl/66-128 m g / d l 9 0 . 9 ± 1 0 . 3 m g / d l
/98±14.3 mg/dl NWF 70-
1 1 0 m g / d l / 7 4 - 1 2 9 m g / d l
90.2±9.0 mg/dl/97.4±14.3 mg/dl N- WR 54-107 mg/dl/79-142 mg/dl
89.3±10.8 mg/dl/99.7±17.1 mg/dl
/
DMNT 72-249 mg/dl/89-
337 mg/dl 154.5±48.1 mg/dl
/206.0±67.6 mg/dl DMWF
89-240mg/dl/96-451 mg/dl 147.5±36.4 mg/dl/216.3±79.4 mg/dl
DMWR 75-224 mg/dl/72-286 mg/dl 1 3 6 . 8 ± 3 4 . 0 m g / d l / 1 9 3 . 9 ± 5 6 . 0 mg/dl
7.4 7.2 10.9 mg/dl
58.7 68.8 62.0 mg/dl
( P-A )
NT-WF NT-WR WF-WR
P-A
T-test
P - A
27.8±11.9 mg/dl 14.4±13.4 mg/dl T-test p 0.016
NT WF WR
N 90.9±10.3/98.0±14.3 90.2±9.0/97.4±14.3 89.3±10.8/99.7±17.1
DM 154.5±48.1/206.0±67.6 147.5±36.4/216.3±79.4 136.8±34.0/193.9±56.0 All data showed in / Average SD mg/dl
NT WF WR
N 7.4±13.5 7.2±13.2 10.9±14.9
DM 58.7±54.2 68.8±57.6 62.0±45.7
All data showed in Average SD mg/dl
NT-WF WF- NT T-test, NT-WR WR - NT T-test, WF-WR WR-WF T-test,
(NT>WF) (NT<WF) p (NT>WR) (NT<WR) p (WF>WR) (WF<WR) p N 10.4±6.7 14.7±9.2 0.06 15.4±9.3 15.2±11.7 0.48 10.7±9.2 14.1±11.0 0.16
DM 42.0±37.7 60.6±30.0 0.19 45.0±39.5 64.8±40.9 0.24 27.8±11.9 14.4±13.4 0.016 All data showed in Average SD mg/dl
P-A
10.4±6.7 mg/dl 14.7±9.2 mg/dl T-test p 0.06
T- test p 0.016
P-A
2 7 . 8 ± 1 1 . 9 m g / d l 14.4±13.4 mg/dl
T-test p 0.06
P-A
1 0 . 4 ± 6 . 7 mg/dl 14.7±9.2 mg/dl
( ) 7
B1
( B1 )
B1 7
8-10 11
12
( > 250 mg/dl )
1.
2001/7 2.Shabana NM, Mirhom YW, Genenah AA, Aboutabl EA, Amer
HA. Study into wild Egyptian plants of potential medicinal ac- tivity. Ninth communication:hypoglycaemic activity of some selected plants in normal fasting and alloxanised rats. Arch Exp Veterinamed 1990; 44: 389-94.
3.Peng X, Tian G. Structural characterization of the glycan part of glycoconjugate LbGp2 from Lycium barbarum L. Carbohydr Res 2001; 331: 95-9.
4.
1989; 116-7 5.
1997 6.
1997; 17: 231-3 7.
1996
8. II
2001; 29: 16
9. 2 20
2001; 20: 345-6 10.
2003/7 11.
2001: 36: 196-9 1 2 .
2002/6
The Influence on Blood Sugar Level by Single Administration of Frucius and Cortex Lycii in Well
Control DM Patient
Shih-Ying Lee, Ding-Yu Guo1, and Chiu-Kuei Sung1
This study is aimed to answer the question "whether Frucius Lycii(fruit) and Cortex Lycii(root) had same influence to blood sugar". There are two sets of group, diabetes and normal. Each group is divided into three ca- tegories by what's been taken, namely None-NT; with Frucius Lycii-WF and with Cortex Lycii-WR. The results showed no significant difference between normal and diabetes. No matter AC, PC & PC minus AC sugar value and between NT-WF, NT-WR and WF-WR within group. But when we examined positive and minus value of PC- AC sugar in each group, there is significant difference between diabetes with fruit and root (p=0.016). While in normal group, there is barely significant between without herb and with fruit (p=0.06). These indicating that if there is a raise or fall of blood sugar, it is usually significantly higher or lower of blood sugar levels, no matter in normal or diabetes for comparing of these two subgroups. So as leading the conclusion of Frucius Lycii(fruit) and Cortex Lycii(root) had difference influence on blood sugar in normal and diabetes person. ( J Intern Med Taiwan 2005;
16: 225-229 )
Department of Neurology, Department of Nurse1 West Garden Hospital
