• 沒有找到結果。

臺灣女裝品牌藍海策略之初探:以無齡感時尚生活館為例

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "臺灣女裝品牌藍海策略之初探:以無齡感時尚生活館為例"

Copied!
72
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)A Study of the Blue Ocean Strategy in Women’s Clothes Made by Taiwanese Brands : A Case of an Ageless and Fashionable Center. 107. 2.

(2) 1985-2005 。. 35. …. …. …. I.

(3) Abstract The women’s clothes made by Taiwanese brands reached the summit between 1985-2005. With the experience, Taiwanese brands’ managers should understand the habits of consumers more than international brands. In the supply chain, they had absolute advantages over distance and speed. What is the reason that Taiwanese brands are going downhill? Author had run my own brand of women's clothes for 35 years. There are two reasons for Taiwanese brands are going downhill. First, the lack of an international perspective will lead to increasing production costs. Second, do not pay attention on advertising will cause less customers’ loyalty. So, this paper analyses by observational survey and case study method. The first chapter is an introduction including research background, research motivation and purpose. Chapter 2: Ageless, the definition of lifestyle, the definition of shopping malls and department stores and shopping malls’ regulations and security. Chapter3: Research methods by observational survey and case study method. Chapter4: From the research methods, we find that Taiwanese brands have obstacles in the supply chain and marketing because consumers do not like wear the same clothes with someone and international brands appear. Chapter 5: Building an ageless and fashionable center by finding market problems and potential opportunities. Chapter 6: Conclusion. Author hope to benefit society by making a new business.. Keywords : ageless, fashion, lifestyle, fashionable center, social enterprise. II.

(4) ……………………………………………………………………………. I. Abstract……………………………………………………………………….. II. ……………………………………………………………………………. III. …………………………………………………………………………. V. …………………………………………………………………………. VI. ……………………………………………………..................... 1. ……………………………………………………... 1. ……………………………………………………... 3. ……………………………………………………... 6. ……………………………………………………………. 7. ………………………………………………………... 7. …………………………………………... 8. ………………………………... 8. ……………………….... 9. ……………………………………………………………. 14. …….………………………………………………….. 14. ………………………………………………….. 15. ………………………………………………. 17. ……………………………………………………... 17. …………………………………………... 20. (. ). III.

(5) ……………………………………………………... 25. ……………………………………………………... 26. ………………………………... 27. …………………………………. 29. ……………………………………………………... 29. ……………………………………………………... 29. SWOT. ………………………………………….. 31. …………..…………………………………………. 33. …………………………………………………………………. 47. ……………………………………………………... 47. ……………………………………………………... 48. ………………………………………………………………………. 50. A…………………………………………………………………………. 52. B…………………………………………………………………………. 62. IV.

(6) 2-1. …………………………………………………. 10. 2-2. …………………………………………………. 11. 3-1. ……………………………………………………..... 14. 4-1. …………………………………………………. 17. 4-2. …………………………………………………………... 21. ……………………………………………. 22. 【………………………………………... 23. …………………………………. 24. ………………………………………………….. 31. 5-2. ……………………………………………………………... 33. 5-3. ……………………………………………….………….. 35. 5-4. ………………………………………………………... 36. 5-5. ……………………………….………………………. 44. 5-6. …………………………………………………………... 44. 4-3 2012-2014 4-4 4-5 5-1. 5-7. 2012. 2014. SWOT. …. 【. ……………………………………………………. V. 45.

(7) . 1-1. ………………………………………………... 3. 1-2. ……………………………………... 4. 4-1. ……………………………………………………….... 18. 4-2. 1982. …………………………………………………….. 20. 4-3. 1985. ……………………………………………………. 21. 5-1. …………………………………………... 34. 5-2. …………………………………………………... 35. 5-3. ………………………………………... 37. 5-4. ………………………………………………………... 39. 5-5. ………………………………………………………... 41. 5-6. ………………………………………………………... 43. 5-7. …………………………………………………………... 44. VI.

(8) 1975. 1980 …. … … …. 1980. ATT 【 …. 1980. … 1.

(9) …. …. … …. 1980. 1990. …. 2010. UNIQLO. UNIQLO 【 【 【 2011. ZARA. 1985-2005 。. 2.

(10) 35. 1-1. 1-1 (. ). 3.

(11) …. …. 2011. NT550. 2015. NT330. …. 220 … …. UNIQLO. ZARA ……. 1-2. 1-2 (. ). 4.

(12) … 【. …. …. 【 「. 、. 2-3 2. 2016-17. 1.1. …. 5.

(13) …. ……. 6.

(14) Andrews (1999). 7.

(15) 【. (. ). …. . …. …. 8.

(16) …. …. ( (. ) ). … … …. … …. … …. (. …. (. …. 9. ). ).

(17) ( ). ( ). 2-1. 2-1. 【. 【. ( ). … … ……. ( ). 2-2 2-2. 10.

(18) ( ). … … … 【. 【. 11. ….

(19) …. 【. SOGO. (. ). … ( ) …. ( ). …. …. ( ) …. 【 … …. ( ). 12.

(20) . 13.

(21) 【. (MBA. 】. ). 3-1. 【. 3-1. outlet. …. 14.

(22) 20 60. …. 【. (. 2003). 15.

(23) . 16.

(24) 2012 20.01. 2016. 1. 「. 4-1. 4-1. l. B2. l. l. 3 1. l. UNIQLO 4. 17.

(25) … …. -. 4-1. 2012 【. 18.

(26) …. 【. 【. ( ) …… ( ). …. 19.

(27) 1982. … … 4-2. 4-2. 1982 (. ). 20.

(28) 1982. 12. 300. 500. 1985. 100. 4-3. 4-2. 4-3. 1985. (. 4-2. 21. ).

(29) … 】. 4-3. 2012-2014. 4-3. 2012-2014. 2012. 21. 7. 8. 2. 38. 2013. 18. 9. 7. 1. 35. 2014. 14. 10. 6. 0. 30. 2012. (. 2014. ) 5-10 ……. (. ). (. ). 27%-30%. 22. 30%-33%.

(30) 4-4. 【 4-4. 【. 1.. 2. 1. 【 3. 2.. 4. … 5.. 1.. 【. 1.. …. 2. 3.. 2.. 4.. 3. 4.. 5.. 23. 【 」.

(31) … 4-5. 2012. 2014. 2. 4-5. 1. …. …. 2012. 2014. …. 【. 2012. 2013. 2014. 124,000. 95,000. 72,000. 4,000. 3,500. 3,000. 496,000,000. 332,500,000. 216,000,000. 49,600,000. (66,500,000). (64,800,000). 10%. 20%. 30%. 446,400,000. 266,000,000. 151,200,000. 6. 5. 4. 267,840,000. 133,000,000. 60,480,000. 25%. 25%. 25%. 200,880,000. 99,750,000. 45,360,000. 40.5%. (30%). (21%). …. 29%-33%. 25%. 24.

(32) 2012. 2014. …. 35. 2015. …. 80. 30. 25.

(33) (. ) …. (. ). 」. …. 26.

(34) 80%. 20%. …. …. … (. ). (. ). (. ). …. …. …. 27.

(35) ……. …. 28.

(36) 50-65 …. 。. 29.

(37) …. …. 【. —. 89 24. 30. 65.

(38) 。. …. SWOT 5-1. SWOT l. Strengths. l. (. +. +. +. 31. ). +. +.

(39) l. l. l. l … l … l l. Weaknesses. 【. l l. B2 「. l Opportunities. 32.

(40) … l. Threats l. …. 200. 5-2. 5-1 5-2. 200. 50. 33.

(41) 5-1 ( (. (. ). (. ). 101 15. 「 「 5-2. 34. )).

(42) 5-2 ( (. 「. ) 5-3. 2. 5-3. 20 30 20 20. 20 20. ). 35.

(43) 30 30. (. ). 5-4 5-4. 2016. 55. 4 10.06 41.44 22.54 20.01 38.82 8.298 3.771. 5-5. 36. 1.

(44) 5-3 ( (. ). ). 1.. 37.

(45) (1). (2). M S 2.. 3.. •. 38. L. XL.

(46) (. ). 5-4. 5-4. (. (. ). 39. ).

(47) 1.. …. 2.. (. ). Nifei Nifei. … …. -. TRX. 40. 、 --.

(48) 5-5 (. ). 1.. 2. (1). (2). …. 41.

(49) (3). 18 130. 60. 18-60 【. A. … +. 42.

(50) 5-6 (. ). -. 。. 30. …. 43.

(51) 5-7. (. ). 5-5. 5-6. 8/9. 10/11. 5-5. 2/3. 3/4. 4/5. 6/7. 5-6 1. 44. 6. 12.

(52) (. ). 5-7. 【. 5-7. (. ). (. ). 1.. 1.. 1.. 2.. 2.. 2.. 3.. 3. 3.. 4.. 4.. 5.. -. 5.. 6.. 6. 7.. 7.. 8.. 8. 9.. -. 45.

(53) … … … … …. … … 。. …. …. A. 46.

(54) …. …. …. 47.

(55) …. …. 48.

(56) . 49.

(57) (2003). :. : 2008. Andrews, M. (1999), “The seduction of agelessness”, Ageing and Society, Vol. 19, pp. 301-18.. ( 2016. 3. 22. ). https://read01.com/y646N6.html#.WjVzzq33V-W (2017. 6. 29. ). https://kknews.cc/society/ovlkjep.html (2016. 5. 13. ). https://kknews.cc/zh-tw/news/jgxlmy.html. https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/ (2006. 4. 3. ). http://agaaeric.pixnet.net/blog/post/37751011-%5B. 50. %5D.

(58) %3F-. https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/. https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/ (2017. 12. 22. ). …. https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=38933&ctNode=3111&mp=1. http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/ (2004. 5. 18. ). http://glrs.moi.gov.tw/LawContentDetails.aspx?id=FL030203&KeyWordHL= (2016. 3. 24. ). NEWoMan. http://www.bubu-jp.com/archives/2052 (2016. 5. 6. ). …. -2016. http://dksopn98.pixnet.net/blog/post/447643118-. 51. …. -2016.

(59) A. IP. …. 52.

(60) 1. 5 2. /. 1. 6. 11. 1. 2.. 3 12. 3.. 1.. :. 40, 60, 80. 1.. 1.. :. 2 2.. ( ). 53. 10 7. 4. * 12. 9. 8.

(61) (. )* / : 1.. 2. 3.. 3. ( Ed /. /. : 4. ). 54.

(62) 5. (. ). (. ). :. K. (. 55. ).

(63) / 1. 1. 2. 3.. * 12. 2. 1. 2. *. Runway. 10 3. 4. 5. SOP. 56.

(64) IT. 57.

(65) #. / 1. 1. 2.. 3. 3.. 6. 18. 50-120. * 12. 1. 2. 2.. 5. 12. 60. 300. 1. 300. 50-120. *. 3. 58. 50-120. EDM.

(66) 4. 50. 2. 100. 50-120. IT. 1. 2.. 5. 1.. 2.. 10. 3.. 3.. 40. 4.. 4.. 4. 59.

(67) 5. 518. 60.

(68) : 1. 2. 3. 1.. SOP. 61.

(69) B. (. ). ( ). 62. (. ). (. ).

(70) (. ). (. ). 1.. 2.. (. ). 63.

(71) . 64.

(72) (. (. ). 2004). 65.

(73)

參考文獻

相關文件

— Teacher explains to students that Step 6 in the marketing research process involves deciding the survey contact methods (how), places (where) and times (when).. — Activity

* School Survey 2017.. 1) Separate examination papers for the compulsory part of the two strands, with common questions set in Papers 1A & 1B for the common topics in

For the data sets used in this thesis we find that F-score performs well when the number of features is large, and for small data the two methods using the gradient of the

Microphone and 600 ohm line conduits shall be mechanically and electrically connected to receptacle boxes and electrically grounded to the audio system ground point.. Lines in

Biases in Pricing Continuously Monitored Options with Monte Carlo (continued).. • If all of the sampled prices are below the barrier, this sample path pays max(S(t n ) −

Because communities of interest are often important, the basic theoretical concept in the bandwagon model is not the number of users, but the user set– that is, the set of consumers

By using the case study and cross analysis of the results, The Purpose of this research is find out the Business implementing Supply Chain Management system project, Our study

This research first analyzed the electronic component industry, and then studied the literature on vertical integration, strategic alliance, and supply chain management.. An