中文版工作復健問卷於心智障礙者之信效度研究
82
0
0
全文
(2)
(3) － 14. 》. － α －. Dr. Escorpizo 世世. 「 －. You're doing a great job!( :. － － （ :. －. ！. 丁. 2016/8. i.
(4) Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire WORQ. ICF. ！. WORQ ！. －. －. －. －. 一. Cronbach's ICC. ！ －. ( (. ( Cronbach's. ( (. 0.84 ！. 0.93. (. (. :. ii.
(5) Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ) is widely used to explain the body functions and structures, the limitations of activity/participation, as well as the environmental factors of the employment readiness for persons with disabilities. In addition to English and Germany versions of WORQ, the Chinese version of WORQ was developed recently, however, these were no psychometric parameters of Chinese version were developed. Therefore, the objective of this study is to exam the reliability and validity of Chinese version of WORQ for persons with mental dysfunctions. Exploratory factor analysis was used to evaluate the construct validity of the questionnaire; Cronbach's α coefficient was used to indicate the internal consistency of WORQ and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to represent the test-retest reliability of WORQ. Based on the results of exploratory factor analysis, there were four factors extracted, which were "basic work ability and body endurance"; "emotional management and personality traits"; "adaptability and personal interaction" and "sensory and physical conditions". In addition, the results indicated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α= 0.84) and high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.93). Therefore, the results indicated that the Chinese version of WORQ is scientifically valid and reliable. According to our finding, we recommended the professionals in various fields could use WORQ to assess the barriers of work and employment readiness for people with mental dysfunctions, in order to assist them to reach the goals of employment. Keyword: Reliability and Validity , Chinese version of WORQ. iii.
(6) . ................................................................................................................ i ......................................................................................................... ii ......................................................................................................... iii. . ............................................................................................................. iv. . ............................................................................................................. vi. . ........................................................................................................... viii. ................................................................................................... 1 －. ............................................................................ 1. －. ........................................................................................ 4. ........................................................................................ 5. 丁 ........................................................................................... 7 ............................................ 7. 一. － －. WORQ. ！. －. ... 10. ................................................... 14. ......................................................................................... 19 ...................................................................................... 19 iv.
(7) －. ...................................................................................... 20. －. ...................................................................................... 23. －. 不 ...................................................................................... 24. － －. .......................................................................... 27 ......................................................................................... 29 .......................................................... 29. .................................................. 32. .................................................. 45. ..................................................................................... 47 －. ...................................................................................... 47. －. ...................................................................................... 51. －. ...................................................................................... 52. －. ...................................................................................... 54. ....................................................................................................... 57. WORQ. ...................................................... 65. v.
(8) 2-1. ........................................ 15. 3-1. ....................................................................... 22. 4-1. ANOVA. 4-2 4-3. 一. ........................................................... 30. ANOVA. ................................................... 30. ANOVA. ................................................... 31. 4-4 KMO. .................................................................. 32. 4-5. KMO. Bartlett’s. ......................... 32. 4-6. ............................... 33. 4-7 4-8. 1 EZparallel. ....................... 35 ................................................ 36. 4-9. –. ......................... 36. 4-10. –. 4-11. –. 4-12. ....................... 39 –. 4-13. –. vi. ............ 37. ............ 39 ....................... 41.
(9) 4-14. –. ............ 41. 4-15. ......................... 43. 4-16. .............................................. 45. vii.
(10) 2-1 ICF. ................................................................................. 10. 3-1 －. ........................................................................................... 19. 3-2 －. ....................................................................................... 24. 4-1. .................................................... 35. viii.
(11) .
(12) －. －. － ！ (. (. 2015. 2016. 105 115 103. 6. 2016 (. 19 2. 7,731 8,277. 11.0%. 1,810. ！ ， 。 ， ！. － : 2012 Chan et al., 2010. 96. 7. 11. (. 一 1.
(13) -. International Classification of. 一. Functioning, Disability and Health. :. ？ ICF. 」. 2014 ICF ( ( 2014. :. ICF. ICF 2010. ）. ICF ; :. Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire WORQ ICF. ICF. 2.
(14) Finger, Escorpizo, Bostan, & De Bie, 2014 ICF. －. 3.
(15) － Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire. WORQ. 2014. － 一. － ( ( －. － ( ( ( ( (. 4. :.
(16) Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire 2004 Gilbride, Thomas, & Stensrud, 1998 (. ICF. 一. Finger et al., 2014 2014. －. 2015 ！. 0. ~10. 40. 103. － 一 (. 一. 5. 10. 15.
(17) 6.
(18) 丁 －. －. 丁 一. ICF. ！. Work Rehabilitation. －. Questionnaire. 100 (. 一 ！. 2014 2012 －. ！. ！. :. :. 、. 、. 7.
(19) 」. ）. ＜ 1998. 2002. 丁 ！. 、. 1998 2013. 2009. 2011 2006. 」 : ！. 2013) －. 2007 2011. 8. －.
(20) 2013. 丁. 2013. 2009. 。 、. 9.
(21) 一. ！. － 一. 2001. ICF. 一. WHO. ！. 且 functioning. 且 health. disability. 一 body function. ( and body structure. activity and participation. (. environment factors (. ( personal factors (. 2011. 2-1 ICF 101. 7. (. 11 10. 2012.
(22) WHO. 一. (. 2012 一. 」 ( (. ！. 一. ！. ！ ！ ＜. ！. ！. 11.
(23) ICF. ！. －. ICF Escorpizo, Finger, Glässel, & Cieza, 2011 ！. －. ICF. －. ！. 2010. (. 4. Fong Chan. －. ICF. 一. ICF. (. ICF. 2014 ICF. ！. (. 2012. ！ 、. 、. 2014 ICF. (. 》. : ICF. － 2011. 一. 98. ( 12.
(24) ICF. 98 ICF 一. 2009 (. ICF. ICF. ） ！. ICF －. ICF. 、. 13. ！.
(25) WORQ 2006. (. 2015. ILO. 1983. 2006 Work disability. ！. Escorpizo et al., 2011. WHO ICF. 一. ！. : Finger et al., 2012. ICF. : Finger et al.,. 2012 2010. 6. WHO : 14.
(26) 2-1 ICF b117. b126. b130. b134 b152 b210. b140 b160 b230. 下 b144. b164 b235. b280. b455 b730. b740. b810 d155. d160 d172. d170 d210. d163. d166 d177. d175. d220. d230. d240 d310 、. -、 d360. d350. d410. d315 d415. d430 ＜ d530. d450 d470. d455. d540. d710 d825 d845 d855. d440. d445 ＜ d465 d475 三上. d570 d720. d830. d840 d850 d870 :. 15.
(27) 2-1 -. e1101. e115 ；. e225. e130. e240. e310. ； e120 ； e125 ； e150 ； e155 ： ； e250. e260. e320 e330 e355. e430. e325 e340 e360. e460. e465. e525 e535 e540 e550. e555. e565 e570 e580. e585. e590 2009 Finger et al, 2012 Bickenbach, Cieza, Rauch, & Stucki, 2012. 、 》. Finger et al., 2012. 16. ！.
(28) Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire WORQ. ，. ！. ICF WORQ. 一. Finger et al., 2014. : 18. e. e310. e330. e580. e590 d. d830. d825. d840. d845. d850. d855 40. b b117. b126. b130. b144. b152. b210. b134. 下 b160. b230. b164. b235. b730. b280. b455. b810. d d155 d210. d160. d166. d230. d240. d315. -、. d430. d440. d470 d720. d177. d350. d360 d445. d475 三上 d540. d570. d870 0. ~10. 17.
(29) Finger 18~65. 74. 、 0.79. － -0.419. 0.88 II -0.439 SF-36. -0.353. －. Finger et al., 2014. :. 18. EuroQol 0.511.
(30) － WORQ. －. :. －. －. －. －. 不. － － Cronbach's α ！. 3-1 －. 19. ICC.
(31) － －. －. 1. :. －. 一 2. 18~50. 3. 4 、 155. －. 1 『. 、 －. 154. － 一 3-1 79. 51.3%. 18~20. 37 50.6%. 75. 48.7%. 24.0% 21~30 31~40. 29. 18.8%. 6.5%. 41~50. 78 10. 21~30 30. : 70.1%. 19.5%. 108 16. 10.4% 一. 20.
(32) 一 61.7%. 95. 一 29. 18.8%. 88. 30. 57.1%. 42.9% 107 69.5%. 47. 30.5%. 21. 19.5%. 66.
(33) 3-1. N=154 %. 18-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 :. 一. 22. 79 75. 51.3 48.7. 37 78 29 10. 24.0 50.6 18.8 6.5. 30 108 16. 19.5 70.1 10.4. 95 29 30. 61.7 18.8 19.5. 88 66. 57.1 42.9. 47 107. 30.5 69.5.
(34) － －. ！ ICF. Finger et al., 2014 2014 2015. ！ 18 e d 40 b d. 0 ~10. 23.
(35) －. 不 3-2. －. 2. 20. 3-2 －. 24. :.
(36) －. Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire. －. WORQ. 2014. 2015. 2. －. － :. －. －. － 0~10. －. 5 － 、. 5. 5 ！. 、 － 5. 25.
(37) －. － －. Finger － 20. 26.
(38) SPSS 22.0 for Windows. － :. 一. t. －. 2010. SPSS. －. Cronbach's α Cronbach's α. 20. ！. 27. ICC.
(39) 28.
(40) －. －. － －. － t. 一. :. N=154. －. 79. 48.7%. 75. t. =88.63. =48.42. =96.27 t=.99. N=154. － 18 29. 51.3%. 20. 18.8%. 21. 30. 37. 24.0%. 41. 50. 4-1. =51.09. p=.34 78 31. 10. 6.5% Levene. p=>.05. 29. 50.6% 40.
(41) 4-1. ANOVA. 18-20 21-30 31-40 41-50. 37 78 29 10. 45.59 53.24 36.65 66.09. N=154. － 108 16. 82.51 96.17 88.55 110.00. F 1.12. 70.1%. 30. :. 19.5%. 10.4%. 4-2. Levene. 4-2. p=>.05. ANOVA :. 30 108 16. 103.37 91.05 80.50. 51.19 50.87 35.87. F 1.23. 一. N=154. － 一. 一. 一 30. 19.5% 4-3. 一. 61.7%. 29. 18.8% Levene. p=>.05 一. 30. 95.
(42) 4-3. 一. ANOVA 95 29 30. 46.93 51.03 57.80. N=154. － 66. 94.51 86.45 91.23. 88. 48.7%. F 0.30. 51.3%. t. =88.51. =43.72. =97.47. =56.70. t=-1.10 N=154. －. 47. 30.5%. 107. t =99.38 =89.26 t=1.17. p=.27. =52.23. =48.51. p=.25. 31. 69.5%.
(43) － KMO. 一. Kaiser-Meyer-Olikin test. Barlett. Kaiser 0. 1. 1974. KMO. 、. KMO. ！. KMO. 1. ！. .70. Barlett. ！ ！. ！ p. .05. KMO 2010. 4-4. 2012. 4-4 KMO KMO .90 .80 .70 .60 .50 .50 4-5. :. marvelous meritorious middling mediocre miserable unacceptable. 、. KMO. － (. Barlett. .718 2135.05. p<.001. － Promax 4-5. KMO. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Bartlett df ***p<.001 32. Bartlett’s .718 2135.054 780.00 0.00.
(44) 4-6 q1 q2 q3 q4 q5 q6 q7 q8 q9 q10 q11 q12 q13 q14 q15 q16 q17 q18 q19 q20 q21 q22 q23 q24 q25 q26 q27 5kg : q28 5kg q29 q30 ， q31 q32 ＜ q33 q34 三上 q35 q36 丁 q37 q38 q39 ， q40. 2.73 2.45 2.63 2.59 2.61 3.20 3.84 4.25 3.42 3.80 0.30 1.94 1.68 2.46 2.71 0.90 3.43 3.47 2.42 3.13 1.49 1.41 5.44 4.62 1.54 1.04 0.37 3.14 0.31 0.32 1.82 2.13 1.27 4.05 0.11 1.79 3.29 3.15 0.11 1.19. 2.77 2.93 2.89 3.14 3.16 3.16 3.10 3.19 2.93 3.21 1.05 2.79 2.84 2.71 2.84 2.10 3.12 2.89 3.09 3.08 2.68 2.63 11.37 3.51 2.67 3.23 1.41 3.44 1.34 1.32 2.95 3.07 2.89 4.80 0.65 2.60 2.93 3.40 0.60 2.34 (. 33.
(45) Kaiser. 1. － Cattell. 2010 2012 1. － 13. 4-7. 6.950 2.619 1.963 1.665 1.243 1.053 0.965 0.872 0.813 0.736 0.681 0.560. 0.556. 51.696%. 4.797 2.925 2.931 3.153 4.660 3.568 3.371 1.361 2.046. 3.188. 1.414. Horn. 4.417. 1.511. 1965. parallel analysis. 』 ！. ！. － 2012. 2012. －. Lautenchlager, Lance. Flaherty 1989 EZparallel. 4-8. － 4. －. 6. 34. 4. 5.
(46) 4-7. 1. % 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9. 7.421 3.005 2.428 2.083 1.602 1.476 1.428 1.311 1.236. 18.553 7.513 6.070 5.207 4.006 3.691 3.569 3.279 3.091. % 18.553 26.066 32.136 37.343 41.349 45.040 48.609 51.888 54.978. 10 11 12 13. 1.202 1.151 1.065 1.032. 3.004 2.877 2.662 2.580. 57.982 60.860 63.522 66.101. % 6.950 2.619 1.963 1.665 1.243 1.053 .965 .872 .813 .736 .681 .560 .556. :. 4-1 35. 17.375 6.547 4.909 4.162 3.108 2.633 2.413 2.180 2.033. % 17.375 23.922 28.831 32.992 36.100 38.733 41.146 43.326 45.360. 4.797 2.925 2.931 3.153 4.660 3.568 3.371 1.361 2.046. 1.841 1.704 1.400 1.391. 47.201 48.904 50.305 51.696. 3.188 1.414 4.417 1.511.
(47) 4-8. EZparallel. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13. 7.421 3.005 2.428 2.083 1.602 1.476 1.428 1.311 1.236 1.202 1.151 1.065 1.032. 2.072 1.923 1.812 1.715 1.627 1.549 1.475 1.408 1.341 1.276 1.273 1.219 1.166. – 6.774. 2.387. 1.772. 1.428. 30.904%. 5.517 4.762 4.003. 4-9. 2.212. 4-9. –. % 1 2 3. 7.421 3.005. 18.553 7.513. % 18.553 26.066. %. 2.428. 6.070. 32.136. 1.772. 4.431. 27.335. 4.003. 4. 2.083. 5.207. 37.343. 1.428. 3.569. 30.904. 2.212. 6.774 2.387. :. 36. 16.935 5.969. % 16.935 22.904. 5.517 4.762.
(48) 4-10. –. q15 q28 5kg q14 q12 q27 5kg : q32 ＜ q24 q10 q20 q35 q36 丁 q21 q34 三上 q5 q4 q6 q7 q37 q1 q8 q3 q18 q2 q9 q23 q30 ， q25 q31 q33. .665 .659 .618 .584 .524 .500 .450 .424 .400 .376 .351 .320 .305 -.237 -.214 -.137 .139 .062 -.109 .326 .309 .267 .040 .078 -.116 -.128 -.127 .212. -.027 -.062 .141 -.076 -.163 -.054 .176 .181 -.026 -.179 .016 .081 -.067 .810 .715 .656 .539 .424 .390 .385 .376 .349 .340 .339 -.065 -.207 .083 -.073. -.111 .053 -.124 -.121 -.084 .072 .054 .150 .301 .112 -.097 .307 .013 .071 .009 -.082 -.158 .227 -.011 -.130 -.073 .194 -.168 .185 .789 .756 .489 .424. .242 -.027 .308 .253 .097 .063 -.296 -.084 -.107 .329 .141 .065 -.021 .243 .205 .016 -.166 -.016 .367 -.081 -.039 -.059 .265 -.196 -.115 .111 .211 .082. .151. -.051. .402. .119. q22. .144. .191. .320. .089. q26. -.126 .187 .255. -.022 .190 .174. .302 .291 .283. .231 -.036 -.078. q19 q17. 、: 37.
(49) 4-10. –. q11 q13 q39 ， q16 q38 q40. .203 -.065 .082 .080 .140 .149 .176. q29. -.212 .212 -.084 .104 .020 .203 .119. Hair, Black, Babin, Anderson. Tatham. .173 .095 .128 .011 -.039 -.066 .162. .579 .552 .412 .382 .274 .206 .197. 2006 200. .4. 150. .45. 2012. .45. －. －. 、. 4-10. 13. 11. 9. 7 6.796 2.436 1.803 1.444 0.976. 33.641%. 5.760 3.629 3.127 2.889. 2.209. 4-11 4-12 5. 15 5. 38. 11. 4.
(50) 4-11. –. % 1 2 3. 7.421 3.005. 18.553 7.513. % 18.553 26.066. %. 2.428. 6.070. 32.136. 1.803. 4.509. 27.590. 3.127. 4 5. 2.083 1.602. 5.207 4.006. 37.343 41.349. 1.444 .976. 3.611 2.440. 31.201 33.641. 2.889 2.209. 6.796 2.436. 16.990 6.091. % 16.990 23.081. 5.760 3.629. :. 4-12 q24 q20 q10 q18 q28 5kg q17 q9 q3 q8 q37 q21 q19 q22 q33 q34 三上 q11 q27 5kg : q35 q12 q15. – .662 .596 .593 .533 .516 .511 .496 .485 .478 .433 .422 .421 .340 .313 .221 -.257 .136 .005 .180 .312. -.009 .000 .053 .024 .328 -.006 -.213 -.045 -.032 -.118 .159 .029 .061 -.008 .148 .552 .527 .511 .480 .439. .026 -.210 -.003 .211 -.091 .049 .128 .085 .125 .220 .028 .124 .113 -.207 -.077 -.021 .023 -.018 -.063 -.109. -.145 .053 .040 -.016 -.107 -.015 .028 .227 .161 .124 -.010 -.055 .050 .218 -.052 .126 -.268 -.050 .071 .167. -.082 .151 .028 .084 -.037 .158 .064 -.138 -.185 .128 .202 .182 .228 .310 -.024 .242 -.095 .124 -.106 -.115 、:. 39.
(51) 4-12. –. q32 ＜ q14 q39 ， q38 q36 丁 q29 q5 q4 q6 q7 q2 q40 q1 q13 q16 q30 ， q23 q25 q31 q26. .296 .342 -.200 -.080 .168 .156 .036 .006 .129 .367 .056 .183 -.053 -.187 -.105 .135 .430 .076 .268 -.120. .425 .386 .363 .249 .210 .196 .027 .024 -.070 -.040 -.075 -.066 -.021 .173 .233 .007 -.252 .038 .219 .125. .071 -.044 .054 .044 -.074 .109 .832 .724 .592 .435 .011 -.143 .169 .102 .081 -.097 -.144 .110 .035 .095. -.239 .323 .086 .130 .156 .065 .055 .049 -.003 -.103 .603 .566 .507 .498 .259 -.099 -.043 .048 -.175 -.008. .020 -.125 .181 .008 -.094 .135 .104 .046 -.076 -.200 -.131 -.069 .040 .170 .065 .616 .589 .422 .326 .298. – 6.812. 2.481. 1.811. 1.502. 36.250% 2.092. 1.021. 0.872. 5.818 3.858 3.012 3.122. 2.147. 4-13. 4-14 5. 15 3. 7 6. 40. 4.
(52) 4-13. –. % 1 2 3. 7.421 3.005. 18.553 7.513. % 18.553 26.066. %. 2.428. 6.070. 32.136. 1.811. 4.528. 27.762. 3.013. 4 5 6. 2.083 1.602 1.476. 5.207 4.006 3.691. 37.343 41.349 45.040. 1.502 1.021 .872. 3.756 2.553 2.179. 31.518 34.070 36.250. 3.122 2.092 2.147. 6.812 2.481. 17.030 6.203. % 17.030 23.234. 5.818 3.858. :. 4-14. –. q24. .620. .136. .027. -.174. -.071. -.155. q20. .587. .066. -.198. .008. .124. -.025. q33 q17 q18 q3 q8 q9 q19 q10 q21 q37 q22 q34 三上 q36 丁 q27 5kg : q32 ＜ q12. .571 .558 .530 .510 .507 .470 .462 .457 .434 .429 .326 .220 .200 -.034 .116 .049. -.209 .010 .073 -.006 .016 -.102 .030 .209 .148 -.075 .059 .163 .163 .598 .533 .502. -.236 .049 .212 .089 .128 .141 .123 .017 .024 .224 .110 -.070 -.075 .022 .073 -.067. -.008 -.094 -.056 .140 .062 .025 -.118 .099 -.052 .120 .065 -.113 .067 -.181 -.130 .128. -.001 .052 .025 -.179 -.234 .094 .069 .146 .104 .108 .189 -.068 -.173 -.005 .115 -.043. .371 .069 .019 -.054 -.058 -.146 .102 -.165 .135 -.030 .079 .052 .115 .034 -.009 .054. q28. .348. .471. -.083. -.036. .073. -.095. .196. .470. -.102. .185. -.066. .044. q15. 5kg. 、:. 41.
(53) 4-14. –. q35. -.053. .437. -.024. -.027. .076. .253. q14 q5 q4 q6 q7 q2 q1 q40 q13 q16. .244 .064 .018 .144 .263 -.072 -.117 .273 -.089 -.187. .395 -.049 -.031 -.065 .103 -.055 -.066 -.148 -.041 .183. -.036 .812 .709 .577 .426 -.010 .171 -.135 .099 .081. .325 .069 .068 -.006 -.025 .838 .625 .445 .422 .348. -.086 .000 -.025 -.119 -.096 .088 .129 -.149 .017 .118. .051 .177 .127 .005 -.215 -.245 -.021 .065 .339 .093. q30 ， q23 q31 q11 q39 ， q25 q26 q29 q38. -.034 .407 .119 -.184 -.074 .238 .013 .266 -.034. .056 -.193 .295 .313 .143 -.134 -.047 .070 .140. -.089 -.131 .041 -.033 .043 .105 .086 .097 .043. .124 .036 -.035 .044 -.049 -.075 -.106 -.057 .056. .837 .609 .418 .023 -.074 .161 .076 -.071 -.106. .023 -.027 .027 .523 .470 .375 .357 .295 .229. －. ！. (. ( (. (. 4-15. 42.
(54) 4-15. q10 q12 q14 q15 q20 q21 q24 q27 q28 q32 ＜ q34 三上 q35 q36 丁 q1 q2 q3 q4 q5 q6 q7 q8 q9 q18 q37 q17 q19 q22 q23 q25 q26 q30 q31 q33. 5kg 5kg. 1 1 、: 43.
(55) 4-15. q11 q13 q16 q29 q38 q39 q40. 20. 44.
(56) SPSS 22.0. － Cronbach's α. .84. 0.7. 4-16 Cronbach's α. ！ q1 q2 q3 q4 q5 q6 q7 q8 q9 q10 q11 q12 q13 q14 q15 q16 q17 q18 q19 q20 q21 q22 q23 q24. .25 .20 .44 .34 .44 .28 .34 .41 .40 .56 .20 .35 .25 .54 .45 .21 .49 .57 .47 .46 .54 .49 .28 .47. .84 .84 .84 .84 .84 .84 .84 .84 .84 .83 .84 .84 .84 .83 .84 .84 .83 .83 .83 .84 .83 .84 .87 .83 、: 45.
(57) 4-16. (. ) Cronbach's α. ！ q25 q26 q27 q28 q29 q30 q31. .33 .12 .23 .51 .35 .29 .40. .84 .84 .84 .83 .84 .84 .84. q32 q33 q34 q35. .38 .37 .18 .28. .84 .84 .84 .84. q36 q37 q38 q39 q40. .50 .14 .16 .25 .27. .83 .84 .84 .84 .84. － 154. －. － 20 ！. ICC ！. 46. .93.
(58) －. － －. －. －. －. － －. 一. － － －. －. －. 154. 一. －. ！. : 2007. 2012. －. －. ！. －. 《. 47. 《.
(59) －. －. 40. － KMO. .718. (. Barlett. 2135.05 p<.001 － Promax. 13 －. 一. ！. Kaiser. 1. Cattell. － Horn. ！ (. 5kg. 5kg 三上. ＜ 丁. ( 48.
(60) (. 1. 1 (. 20 － － 103. 10. －. 15. 一. (. (. 一. ( (. 2012. ！. －. ！ ！. :. 49. ((.
(61) 、 ( 2013. 2011). －. 2007. －. 18-50. －. 一 154. Cronbach's α 20. －. 0.84 ICC. 0.93 ！ －. 0.88 Finger et al., 2014. 50. Finger 0.79.
(62) － － :: －. －. 21~30. － 一 t 一. KMO 2135.05. Barlett. p<.001 (. (. (. (. Cronbach's α ICC. ！ ！. Cronbach's α. － (. .84 ！. .93. (. 51.
(63) － －. －. －. 一. － ICF －. －. －. 2014. －. 2015. 0~10 “ 0. ”. “. ”. “. ”. 10. (. －. －. －. 52. “. ”. 、.
(64) －. －. ！. 53.
(65) － －. －. －. ！. －. －. 、:. :. －. －. 一 一. ！. －. －. －. 一. －. －. －. －. 一. 、. 《 、. 54. 5.
(66) －. ！. ！. －. ( －. ！. －. －. －. 55.
(67) 56.
(68) 1998. 14(3). 28-32 2013. 2011. ICF. 11(1). 2015. 6. 30 http://www2.evta.gov.tw/safe/docs/safe95/userplane/half_year_display. asp?menu_id=3&submenu_id=511&ap_id=1312 2012 125. ICF. 一. 19-28. 2007 11(2) 2010. 149-198 ICF. ) 4 2013. 43-46. 七 38(3). －. 2009. 29-53 ICF. －. 2010 ICF. F. 57.
(69) Chan, J. Keegan, C.Sung, M. Drout, C. H. Pai, E. Anderson, & N. McLain. 4. 23-42. 2015. 104. 12. 16. 10400146761 2014. 103. 10. 15. 1031561659 1998 135. ！. 46-54 2006 23. － 27-53. 2013 ／ 2013. 2010. SPSS PASW. －. 2010. 一. 4. ( 2012. ICF 47-48. SPSS 2007. 丁. 3(2). －. 61-71. 2011. －. 58. ／.
(70) α 2004 16(1). 51-57. 2012 2011 30(1). 5-18. 2011 98. 一 5. 25-46 2015 13(4). －. 2013. 255-267. ／ 2011 一 24(4). 525-548. 2002. 1(2). 88-94 2014 2011. 42(1). 31-40 2006 2015 2016. 6. :. :. 100. 27. http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOS/Statistic.aspx?f_list_no=312&fod_l ist_no=3530 59.
(71) 2016. 2016. 6. 27. http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOS/Statistic.aspx?f_list_no=312&fod_l ist_no=4198 2016 27. 2016. 6. http://crpd.sfaa.gov.tw/index.php/tw/. 2009. 一. (. －. ／. 2009 8(1). 2015. 6. 30. http://www2.evta.gov.tw/safe/docs/safe95/userplane/half_year_display. asp?menu_id=3&submenu_id=477&ap_id=843 Chan, F., Keegan, J., Sung, C., Drout, M., Pai, C. H., Anderson, E., & Mclain, N. (2010). The World Health Organization ICF Model as a Framework for Assessing Vocational Rehabilitation Outcomes. 4. 1-22.. 60.
(72) Bickenbach, J., Cieza, A., Rauch, A., & Stucki, G. (2012). ICF Core Sets: Manual for Clinical Practice. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. Retrieved from http://www.icf-core-sets.org/en/page1.php Bültmann, U., Sherson, D., Olsen, J., Hansen, C. L., Lund, T., & Kilsgaard, J. (2009). Coordinated and tailored work rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation undertaken with workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19, 81-93. Escorpizo, R., Ekholm, J., Gmünder, H. P., Cieza, A., Kostanjsek, N., & Stucki, G., (2010). Developing a core set to describe functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20(4), 502-511. Escorpizo, R., Finger, M. E., Glässel, A., & Cieza, A. (2011). An international expert survey on functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21(2), 147-155. Escorpizo, R., Finger, M. E., Glässel, A., Gradinger, F., Lückenkemper, M., & Cieza, A. (2011). A systematic review of functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21(2), 134-146. Escorpizo, R., Reneman, M. F., Ekholm, J., Fritz, J., Krupa, T., Marnetoft, S. U., Maroun, C. E., Guzman, J. R., Suzuki, Y., Stucki, G., Chan, C. C. (2011). A conceptual definition of vocational rehabilitation based on 61.
(73) the ICF: Building a shared global model. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21(2), 126-133. Finger, M. E., Escorpizo, R., Bostan, C., & De Bie, R. (2014). Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ): Development and preliminary psychometric evidence of an ICF-based questionnaire for vocational rehabilitation. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 24(3), 498-510. Finger, M. E., Escorpizo, R., Glässel, A., Gmünder, H. P., Lückenkemper, M., Chan, C., …Cieza, A. (2012). ICF Core Set for vocational rehabilitation: results of an international consensus conference. Disability & Rehabilitation, 34(5), 429-438. Finger, M. E., Selb, M., De Bie, R., & Escorpizo, R. (2014). Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in physiotherapy in multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation: A case study of low back pain. Physiotherapy Research International. Gilbride, D. D., Thomas, J. R., & Stensrud, R. (1998). Beyond status code 26: Development of an instrument to measure the quality of placements in the state-federal program. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 29(1), 3-7. Glässel, A., Rauch, A., Selb, M., Emmenegger, K., Lückenkemper, M., & Escorpizo, R. (2012). A case study on the application of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-based tools for vocational rehabilitation in spinal cord injury. Work (Reading, Mass.), 41(4), 465-474. Hoefsmit, N., Houkes, I., & Nijhuis, F. (2014). Environmental and personal factors that support early return-to-work: A qualitative study using the ICF as a framework. Journal of Work, 48(2), 203-215.. 62.
(74) Portmann Bergamaschi, R., Escorpizo, R., Staubli, S., & Finger. M. E. (2014). Content validity of the work rehabilitation questionnaire-self-report version WORQ-SELF in a subgroup of spinal cord injury patients. Journal of Spinal Cord, 52(3), 225-230. Wang, Y., & Lin, Y. (2013). Employment outcome predictors for people with disabilities in Taiwan -A preliminary study using ICF conceptual frameworks. Journal of Rehabilitation, 79(2), 3-14. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1345910737?accountid=36319. 63.
(75) 64.
(76) WORQ. 65.
(77) 66.
(78) 67.
(79) 68.
(80) 69.
(81) 70.
(82) 71.
(83)
相關文件
Plant, Roger (2012), Draft Report on the Application of International Legal Instruments of Human Trafficking and Forced Labour: A Case of Taiwan,
5.1.1 This chapter presents the views of businesses collected from the business survey, 12 including on the number of staff currently recruited or relocated or planned to recruit
This study proposed the Minimum Risk Neural Network (MRNN), which is based on back-propagation network (BPN) and combined with the concept of maximization of classification margin
Based on the observations and data collection of the case project in the past three years, the critical management issues for the implementation of
and Liu, S.J., “Quantifying Benefits of Knowledge Management System: A Case Study of an Engineering Consulting Firm,” Proceedings of International Symposium on Automation and
(計畫名稱/Title of the Project) 提升學習動機與解決實務問題能力於實用課程之研究- 以交通工程課程為例/A Study on the Promotion of Learning Motivation and Practical
(英文) In this research, we will propose an automatic music genre classification approach based on long-term modulation spectral analysis on the static and dynamic information of
The effect of gender on motivation and student achievement in digital game-based learning: A case study of a contented-based classroom. Using game-based learning to
