• 沒有找到結果。

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Weight Choosability of theta Graphs"

Copied!
86
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs

Ting-Feng Jian

Advisor: Gerard Jennhwa Chang

Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan University

August 2, 2014

(2)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs

Outline

1. Introduction 2. The Paths 3. The Cycles 4. The θ-graphs

5. The Generalized θ-graphs 6. Further Problems

(3)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

Definitions

1. G = (V , E ) be a connected graph but not K2.

(4)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

Definitions

2. L(e) ⊆ R, a list of weights of e.

(5)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

Definitions

3. L-edge weighting: f such that f (e) ∈ L(e).

(6)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

Definitions

4. induced weight: g (v ) =P

uv∈Ef(uv ).

(7)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

Definitions

5. proper weighting: g (v ) 6= g (v).

(8)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

Definitions

1. L(e) = {1, 2, ..., k}, f proper weighting

⇒ G is k-edge weight colorable.

2. L(e) ⊆ R, f proper weighting

⇒ G is k-edge weight choosable.

(9)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

Problems

Conjecture (M.Karonski, T.Luczak, and A.Thomason) ([1]) Every connected graph G 6= K2 is 3-edge weight colorable.

Conjecture (T.Bartnicki, J.Grytczuk, and S.Niwczykl) ([2]) Every connected graph G 6= K2 is 3-edge weight choosable.

(10)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

Recent Result

Theorem (M.Kalkowski, M.Karonski, and F.Pfender, 2010) ([8]) Every connected graph G 6= K2 is 5-edge weight colorable.

Theorem (T.Bartnicki, J.Grytczuk, and S.Niwczyk1)

([2]) A clique, complete bipartite graph, or a tree, not K2, is 3-edge weight choosable.

(11)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

Polynomials

1. Edge Set: E = {e1, e2, ..., em}.

2. Variables xe = f (e) ∈ L(e).

3. Associated polynomial of G of orientation D:

PG(x1, x2, ..., xm) = Y

vv∈E (D)

X

e=uv ∈E

xe− X

e=uv∈E

xe

! 6= 0

(12)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

Example

Then the associated polynomial: PG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)

= (x4−x2−x5)(x1+x5−x3)(x2−x4−x5)(x3+x5−x1)(x1+x2−x3−x4).

(13)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

Combinatorial Nullstellensatz

Theorem (N. Alon, 1999)

([3]) Let F be an arbitrary field, and let P(x1, x2, ..., xm) be a polynomial in F[x1, x2, ..., xm]. Suppose that the coefficient of x1k1x2k2...xmkm in P is non-zero and deg(P) =Pm

i=1ki. Then for any subsets A1, A2, ..., Am of F satisfying |Ai| ≥ ki + 1 for all i = 1, 2, ..., m, there exists

(a1, a2, ..., am) ∈ A1 × A2× ... × An so that P(a1, a2, ..., am) 6= 0.

(14)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

Monomial Index

Define the monomial index by mind(P) = min

M h(M) = min

M max

1≤i ≤mki. Coeffiecient of x1x2...xm is non-zero

⇒ 2-egde Weight Choosable.

Coeffiecient of x1k1x2k2...xmk2 is non-zero for ki ≤ 2

⇒ 3-egde Weight Choosable.

(15)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

Example

Then the associated polynomial: PG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)

= (x4−x2−x5)(x1+x5−x3)(x2−x4−x5)(x3+x5−x1)(x1+x2−x3−x4).

(16)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

Permanent

Let m × m matrix A = [aij].

1. Permanent:

perA = X

σ∈Sm

m

Y

i=1

ai σ(i )

! .

2. Let K = (k1, k2, ..., km), ki ≥ 0 and Pm

i=1ki = m.

Repeating the i -th columns ki times, denoted A(K ).

(17)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

Permanent Index

permanent index:

The minimum of k so that there is

K = (k1, k2, ..., km), ki ≤ k for all i and perA(K ) 6= 0.

(18)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

Orientation

Fixed orientation D of a graph G , define the associated matrix AG = [aij] by

aij =

1, if ej is incident to the head of ei;

−1, if ej is incident to the tail of ei; 0, if ej and ei are not incident.

(19)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

The Relation

PG(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) AG

= (x4− x2− x5) 0 −1 0 1 −1 (x1+ x5− x3) 1 0 −1 0 1 (x2− x4− x5) 0 1 0 −1 −1 (x3+ x5− x1) −1 0 1 0 1 (x1+ x2− x3− x4) 1 1 −1 −1 0

(20)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

The Relation

Coefficient of x1x2x3x4x5: perAG.

Coefficient of x12x2x3x4: perAG(2, 1, 1, 1, 0)/2!.

Coefficient of x12x22x3: perAG(2, 2, 1, 0, 0)/2!2!.

Coefficient of x13x2x3: perAG(3, 1, 1, 0, 0)/3!.

(21)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

The Lemma

Lemma

([2]) Let A = [aij] be a m × m matrix with finite permanent index. Let the polynomial

P(x1, x2, ..., xm) =

m

Y

i=1 m

X

j=1

aijxj

! ,

then mind(P) = pind(A).

(22)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Introduction

Useful Result

Theorem

([2]) Let AG be an associated matrix of G . If pind(AG) ≤ k, then G is (k + 1)-edge weight choosable.

(23)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Paths

Paths

Let path Pm : v1v2...vm+1 with m edges.

(24)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Paths

Associated Matrices

APm =

0 −1 0 0 0 . ..

1 0 −1 0 . .. 0

0 1 0 . .. 0 0

0 0 . .. 0 −1 0

0 . .. 0 1 0 −1

. .. 0 0 0 1 0

 .

(25)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Paths

2-Choosability

Theorem

Let Pm be a path. Let APm be the associated matrix of Pm, m ≥ 2. Then

perAPm = (−1)m2, if m is even 0, otherwise.

AP2 =0 −1 1 0



AP3 =

0 −1 0

1 0 −1

0 1 0

(26)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Paths

3-Choosability

Lemma

Let APm be the associated matrix of path Pm with m ≥ 4 edges. Let K = (k1, k2, ..., km) where k1 = km = 0,

k2 = k3 = 2, and other ki = 1. Then perAPm(K ) = 4 K = (0, 2, 2, 1, ..., 1, 0)

(27)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Paths

3-Choosability

APm(K ) =

−1 −1 0 0 0 0 · · · 0 0

0 0 −1 −1 0 0 · · · 0 0

1 1 0 0 −1 0 · · · 0 0

0 0 1 1 0 −1 · · · 0 0

0 0 0 0 1 0 · · · 0 0

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

0 0 0 0 0 0 · · · 0 −1

0 0 0 0 0 0 · · · 1 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 · · · 0 1

 ,

(28)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Paths

Non-2-Choosability

P3 is 2-choosable. Take x1, x3 so that x1 6= x3 and x2 6= 0.

(29)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Paths

Non-2-Choosability

Pm is not 2-choosable for odd m ≥ 5.

(1) xi 6= xi+2 and x2 6= 0, xm−16= 0.

(2) Assign L(e2j) = {j − 1, j} for j = 1, 2, ...,m−32

(30)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Cycles

Cycles

Let E = {e1, e2, ..., en} be the edge set of Cn. Give the orientation as ei+1 follows ei for i = 1, 2, ..., n − 1 and e1

follows en.

(31)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Cycles

Associated Matrices

ACn =

0 −1 0 0 · · · 0 0 1

1 0 −1 0 · · · 0 0 0

0 1 0 −1 · · · 0 0 0

0 0 1 0 · · · 0 0 0

... ... ... ... . .. ... ... ...

0 0 0 0 · · · 0 −1 0

0 0 0 0 · · · 1 0 −1

−1 0 0 0 · · · 0 1 0

 .

(32)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Cycles

2-Choosability

n is odd: an= 1n+ (−1)n = 0.

n is even:

bij =

1, if i − j = 0;

−1, if i − j = −1(mod n);

0, otherwise.

an= (1n2 + (−1)n2)bn2 = 4, if 4 divides n 0, otherwise.

(33)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Cycles

2-Choosability

Theorem

Let Cn be a cycle. Let ACn be the associated matrix of Cn, n ≥ 3. Then

perACn = 4, if 4 divides n;

0, otherwise.

(34)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Cycles

3-Choosability

Theorem

Let ACn be the associated matrix of Cn, n ≥ 4.

Let K = (k1, k2, ..., kn) where k1 = k2 = 2, k3 = k4 = 0 and other ki = 1.

Then

perACn(K ) = (−1)n× 4.

In particular, perACn(K ) 6= 0.

(35)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Cycles

Associated Matrices

ACn =

0 −1 0 0 · · · 0 0 1

1 0 −1 0 · · · 0 0 0

0 1 0 −1 · · · 0 0 0

0 0 1 0 · · · 0 0 0

... ... ... ... . .. ... ... ...

0 0 0 0 · · · 0 −1 0

0 0 0 0 · · · 1 0 −1

−1 0 0 0 · · · 0 1 0

 .

(36)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Cycles

Finding A(K )

AC4(K ) =

0 0 −1 −1

1 1 0 0

0 0 1 1

−1 −1 0 0

AC5(K ) =

0 0 −1 −1 1

1 1 0 0 0

0 0 1 1 0

0 0 0 0 −1

−1 −1 0 0 0

 a4 = 4, a5 = −4.

(37)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Cycles

Finding A(K )

ACn(K ) =

0 0 −1 −1 0 · · · 0 1

1 1 0 0 0 · · · 0 0

0 0 1 1 0 · · · 0 0

0 0 0 0 −1 · · · 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 · · · 0 0

... ... ... ... ... . .. ... ...

0 0 0 0 0 · · · 0 −1

−1 −1 0 0 0 · · · 1 0

 .

an = an−2 = (−1)n× 4.

(38)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Cycles

Non-2-Choosability

Theorem

If 4 does not divide n, then Cn is not 2-edge weight colorable.

(39)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Cycles

Consequences

2-edge weight choosable:

P3, Pm for even m and Cn for 4 divides n.

3-edge weight choosable:

Pm for odd m 6= 3 and Cn for 4 does not divide n.

(40)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

What Is a θ-graph?

θ(m1, m2, m3) for the θ-graph if the lengths of the upper, middle, and lower paths are m1, m2, m3, respectively.

(41)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

Associated Matrices

Aθ(3,2,3) =

0 −1 0 1 0 1 0 0

1 0 −1 0 0 0 0 0

0 1 0 0 −1 0 0 −1

1 0 0 0 −1 1 0 0

0 0 −1 1 0 0 0 −1

1 0 0 1 0 0 −1 0

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 −1

0 0 −1 0 −1 0 1 0

 .

(42)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

Associated Matrices

AX AXY AXZ AYX AY AYZ AZX AZY AZ

,

AX, AY, and AZ: associated matrix of paths of lengths m1, m2, m3, respectively.

Other submatrices have only two numbers: 1 on the upper left and −1 on the lower right.

(43)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

Notations

1. S = (R, C ) where |R| = |C | and

R ⊆ {1, 2, ..., m}, C ⊆ {1, 2, ..., m}.

2. AS: submatrix of A formed by the R rows and C -th columns.

3. A(S): submatrix of A obtained by deleting the R rows and C columns.

(44)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

The Main Proposition

Proposition

Let Aθ(m1,m2,m3) be the associated matrix of θ(m1, m2, m3).

Let S3 demote the permutation group of rank 3. Then 1. perAθ(m1,m2,m3)= perAθ(mσ(1),mσ(2),mσ(3)) for all σ ∈ S3. 2. perAθ(m1+4,m2,m3)= perAθ(m1,m2,m3) for m1 ≥ 3.

(45)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

The Proof

Let A = Aθ(m1+4,m2,m3) and B = Aθ(m1,m2,m3). Such A has the following form:

A=

0 −1 0 0 0 0 0 · · ·

1 0 −1 0 0 0 0 · · ·

0 1 0 −1 0 0 0 · · ·

0 0 1 0 −1 0 0 · · · AXY AXZ

0 0 0 1 0 −1 0 · · ·

0 0 0 0 1 0 −1 · · ·

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 · · ·

... ... ... ... ... ... ... . .. ... ...

AYX AY AYZ

AZX AZY AZ

 .

Choose R = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6} with |R| = 5.

(46)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

The Proof

perAS1 = perA(R,{1,2,3,4,5}) = per

1 0 −1 0 0

0 1 0 −1 0

0 0 1 0 −1

0 0 0 1 0

0 0 0 0 1

= 1.

perAS2 = perA(R,{1,3,4,5,6}) = per

1 −1 0 0 0

0 0 −1 0 0

0 1 0 −1 0

0 0 1 0 −1

0 0 0 1 0

= 1.

(47)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

The Proof

perAS3 = perA(R,{1,2,3,4,7}) = per

1 0 −1 0 0

0 1 0 −1 0

0 0 1 0 0

0 0 0 1 0

0 0 0 0 −1

= 0.

perAS4 = perA(R,{2,3,4,5,6}) = per

0 −1 0 0 0

1 0 −1 0 0

0 1 0 −1 0

0 0 1 0 −1

0 0 0 1 0

= 0.

(48)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

The Proof

perAS5 = perA(R,{2,3,4,5,7}) = per

0 −1 0 0 0

1 0 −1 0 0

0 1 0 −1 0

0 0 1 0 0

0 0 0 1 −1

= −1.

perAS6 = perA(R,{3,4,5,6,7}) = per

−1 0 0 0 0

0 −1 0 0 0

1 0 −1 0 0

0 1 0 −1 0

0 0 1 0 −1

= −1.

(49)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

The Proof

perA =

6

X

k=1

perASkperA(Sk)

= perA(S1)+ perA(S2)− perA(S5)− perA(S6).

perB =

m1+m2+m3

X

k=1

perB({2},{k})perB({2},{k})

= perB({2},{1})− perB({2},{3}).

(50)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

The Proof

perA(S1)+ perA(S2)= perB({2},{1}), perA(S5)+ perA(S6) = perB({2},{3})

perA = perB.

perAθ(m1+4,m2,m3) = perAθ(m1,m2,m3).

(51)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

The Table of perA

θ(m1,m2,m3)

m1 = 1 m3 = 2 m3 = 3 m3 = 4 m3 = 5 m3 = 6

m2 = 2 0 4 0 4 0

m2 = 3 0 −4 0 4

m2 = 4 0 −4 0

m2 = 5 0 4

m2 = 6 0

(52)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

The Table of perA

θ(m1,m2,m3)

m1 = 2 m3 = 2 m3 = 3 m3 = 4 m3 = 5 m3 = 6

m2 = 2 −20 0 4 0 −20

m2 = 3 4 0 4 0

m2 = 4 −4 0 4

m2 = 5 4 0

m2 = 6 −20

(53)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

The Table of perA

θ(m1,m2,m3)

m1 = 3 m3 = 3 m3 = 4 m3 = 5 m3 = 6

m2 = 3 0 −4 0 4

m2 = 4 0 −4 0

m2 = 5 0 4

m2 = 6 0

(54)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

The Table of perA

θ(m1,m2,m3)

m1 = 4 m3 = 4 m3 = 5 m3 = 6

m2 = 4 20 0 −4

m2 = 5 −4 0

m2 = 6 4

(55)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

The Table of perA

θ(m1,m2,m3)

m1 = 5 m3 = 5 m3 = 6

m2 = 5 0 4

m2 = 6 0

m1 = 6 m3 = 6 m2 = 6 −20

(56)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

2-Choosability

Theorem

Let Aθ(m1,m2,m3) be the associated matrix of θ(m1, m2, m3).

Then perAθ(m1,m2,m3) 6= 0 if and only if m = m1 + m2+ m3 is even.

(57)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

Useful Proposition

Proposition

([2]) Let G be a graph whose edge set can be partitioned into two subgraph P, Q, in which P = {e1, e2, ..., em}.

Assume that the associated matrices AP, AQ have permanent indexes at most 2. Let perAP(K ) 6= 0 where K = (k1, k2, ..., km) with ki = 0 for any correspondent edge ei incident to Q. Then pind(AG) ≤ 2.

(58)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

The Proof

We can separate P into two parts:

P1 = {ei ∈ P : ei does not link to Q}, P2 = {ei ∈ P : ei link to Q}.

AG =

AP1 ... 0 ... AP2 ...

0 ... AQ

.

(59)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

The Proof

By assumption, all the edges ei in P2 gives ki = 0.

AG(K) =AP(K ) ...

0 AQ(K(Q))



with permanent

perAG(K) = perAP(K ) × perAQ(K(Q)) 6= 0.

(60)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

Consequences

m1 ≤ m2 ≤ m3.

If m3 ≥ 4, then P = Pm3 and Q = Cm1+m2. Check the case m3 ≤ 3.

(61)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The θ-graphs

3-Choosability

m1 m2 m3 K perAθ(m1,m2,m3)(K )

1 2 2 (0, 2, 1, 1, 1) 12

1 2 3 (1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1) 4

1 3 3 (2, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1) 16 2 2 2 (1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1) −20 2 2 3 (2, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1) −4 2 3 3 (1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1) 4 3 3 3 (2, 2, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1) 4

.

(62)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

What Is a Generalized θ-graph?

Generalized θ-graph θ(m1, m2, ..., mp):

p paths which have the two common endpoints.

In particular, θ(m) = Pm and θ(m1, m2) = Cm1+m2.

(63)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

A Useful Theorem

Theorem

([2]) If G 6= K2 is a clique, complete bipartite graph, or a tree, then mind(G ) ≤ 2.

(64)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

Step 1

Step 1. θ(2, 2, ..., 2) = K2,p is 3-edge weight choosable.

(65)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

Step 2

Step 2. mi ≥ 2 for all i = 1, 2, ...p

θ-graph θ(m1, m2, ..., mp) with is 3-edge weight choosable.

(66)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

Step 3

Step 3. θ(m1, m2, ..., mp, 1) is 3-edge weight choosable.

(67)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

Step 3

Let L ⊆ R and c ∈ R.

L+ c = {l + c : l ∈ L}.

Arbitrary choose x ∈ L(u0u1) and fix this x. p ≥ 3, define a lists L(e) on θ(m1, m2, ..., mp) by

L(e) = L(e) + x p− 2.

(68)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

Odd Cycle Absorbs P

3

Theorem

Assume that k ≥ 3. Let G = (V , E ) be a graph. Suppose there are path P3 = v0v1v2v3 and odd cycle Ct in G such that P3∩ Ct = {v0, v3} ⊂ V . If G − P3 is k-edge weight choosable, then so is G .

(69)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

The Proof

(70)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

The Proof

(71)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

The Proof

(72)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

The Proof

(73)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

The Proof

(74)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

The Proof

(75)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

The Proof

(76)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

The Proof

(77)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

The Proof

(78)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

The Proof

(79)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

The Proof

L(e) =









L(e) + xv0v12 +xv2v32 , if e = ui−1ui for odd i ≤ s;

L(e) −xv0v12xv2v32 , if e = ui−1ui for even i < s;

L(e) + xv0v12xv2v32 , if e = ui−1ui for odd i > s;

L(e) −xv0v12 + xv2v32 , if e = ui−1ui for even i > s;

L(e), otherwise.

(80)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs The Generalized θ-graphs

The Proof

xe =









xexv0v12xv2v32 , if e = ui−1ui for odd i ≤ s;

xe + xv0v12 +xv2v32 , if e = ui−1ui for even i < s;

xexv0v12 +xv2v32 , if e = ui−1ui for odd i > s;

xe + xv0v12xv2v32 , if e = ui−1ui for even i > s;

xe, otherwise

(81)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs Further Problems

Problems

1. Total Weight Choosability, by T. Wong and X. Zhu [9].

2. Weight Choosability of Hypergraphs,

by M. Kalkowski, M. Karonski, and F. Pfender [10].

(82)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs References

References

(83)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs References

References

(84)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs References

References

(85)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs References

References

(86)

Weight Choosability of theta Graphs References

References

參考文獻

相關文件

The function f (m, n) is introduced as the minimum number of lolis required in a loli field problem. We also obtained a detailed specific result of some numbers and the upper bound of

另外因為 Gal(L/F ) 是 Gal(L/K) 的 normal subgroup, 所以由 Second Fundamental Theorem 4.1.8 知 F/K 也是 Galois extension, 而且 Gal(F/K) isomorphic to Gal(L/K)/Gal(L/F )

A subgroup N which is open in the norm topology by Theorem 3.1.3 is a group of norms N L/K L ∗ of a finite abelian extension L/K.. Then N is open in the norm topology if and only if

Because both sets R m  and L h i ði ¼ 1; 2; :::; JÞÞ are second-order regular, similar to [19, Theorem 3.86], we state in the following theorem that there is no gap between

(a) The magnitude of the gravitational force exerted by the planet on an object of mass m at its surface is given by F = GmM / R 2 , where M is the mass of the planet and R is

The Hilbert space of an orbifold field theory [6] is decomposed into twisted sectors H g , that are labelled by the conjugacy classes [g] of the orbifold group, in our case

Lemma 4.5.. Then, the proof is complete.. By Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 4.6, the conclusion is drawn. Baes, Convexity and differentiability properties of spectral functions and

We will give a quasi-spectral characterization of a connected bipartite weighted 2-punctually distance-regular graph whose halved graphs are distance-regular.. In the case the