• 沒有找到結果。

Exploring the effects of primary students' learning styles and self-regulated learning strategies on 黃玉雪、吳為聖

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Exploring the effects of primary students' learning styles and self-regulated learning strategies on 黃玉雪、吳為聖"

Copied!
3
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

Exploring the effects of primary students' learning styles and self-regulated learning strategies on

黃玉雪、吳為聖

E-mail: [email protected]

ABSTRACT

Exploring the Effects of Primary Students’ Learning Styles and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies on English Learning Achievement Previous researches revealed that learners’ learning results is related to their learn-ing styles and students’

self-regulated English learning strategies could influence their learning achievements. However, rare empirical evidences had on enlightenment of for-eign language learning. Therefore, the purposes of this study were to explore the rela-tionships and differences of elementary school students’ learning styles and self-regulated English learning strategies on English learning achievements. A survey was administrated to 330 students from third to sixth grade in a public elementary school. Students’ English vocabulary test scores and examination scores were collected. Descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlation, one-way ANOVA, and two-way ANOVA were employed to analyze the effective data. The find-ings are as follows: (1)Majority of the subjects were

‘Divergent’ style, followed by ‘As-similator’, ‘Accommodator’, and ‘Converger’ styles.(2)The subjects frequently utilized regulative orientation of cognition, followed by management orientation of resource and regulative orientation of motivation, to learning English.(3)The subjects with different learning styles had significant differences on their English learning achievements.

(4)Self regulative learning strategies had positive influences on English learning achievements and on-line vocabulary test scores respectively. (5)The learning styles and self-regulated learning strategies had an interactive effect on English learning achieve-ments.

Based on the findings, implications on English teaching and school administrations are discussed. Suggestions for improving English teaching are also provided .

Keywords : learning styles、self-regulated learning、vocabulary

Table of Contents

內容目錄 中文摘要 .....................iii 英文摘要 .................

....iv 誌謝辭  .....................v 內容目錄 ................

.....vi 表目錄  .....................viii 圖目錄  ..............

.......x 第一章  緒論...................1   第一節  研究背景.......

........1   第二節  研究動機與目的............4   第三節  研究範圍與限制...

.........7   第四節  研究流程...............9 第二章  文獻探討.......

..........12   第一節  學習風格之理論及其相關的研究12   第二節  自我調整學習策略之意涵及 其相關的研究.22   第三節  國小英語學習成效及其影響因素.....38 第三章  研究方法........

.........43   第一節  研究架構與假設............43   第二節  研究對象與工具.

...........47 第四章  研究結果.................60   第一節  樣本人口統計

.............60   第二節  不同學習風格國小學生的英語學習成效之        差異性分析.

.............63   第三節  國小學生自我調整學習策略與英語學習成        效的相關分析

.............67   第四節  國小學生學習風格與自我調整學習策略對        英語學習成效 之交互作用分析......71   第五節  研究假設檢驗.............76 第五章  結論與建議.

...............78   第一節  研究結論...............78   第二節  研究 建議...............80 參考文獻 .....................87 附錄A  研究問 卷.................98 附錄B  專家效度修改意見彙整表 ..........102 附錄C  研 究問卷專家效度學者名單 .........104 表目錄 表 2- 1學習風格比較表................19 表 2- 2五大學派分析表................27 表 2- 3自我調整學習策略之定義彙整表........

.29 表 3- 1自我調整學習策略預試量表有效預試樣本彙整表..49 表 3- 2自我調整學習策略量表之項目分析暨信度分析彙 整表50 表 3- 3自我調整學習策略之信度分析表.........52 表 3- 4自我調整學習策略量表之分量表、題號與題數

...53 表 3- 5Kolb學習風格分類表..............55 表 3- 6Kolb學習風格量表信度分析表 .....

.....55 表 4- 1正式問卷樣本來源彙整表............60 表 4- 2樣本分佈情形...........

......61 表 4- 3學習風格分佈情形...............62 表 4- 4自我調整學習策略分佈情形....

(2)

.......62 表 4- 5英語成就評量成績分佈情形...........63 表 4- 6線上英語字彙學習成效分佈情形.

........63 表 4- 7不同學習風格與英語成就評量成績之變異數同質性檢 定................

......64 表 4- 8不同學習風格學生之英語成就差異分析......64 表 4- 9學習風格在英語線上字彙成績之單因 子變異數分析摘 要......................66 表 4-10自我調整策略和英語成就評量成績之相關 性....68 表 4-11自我調整策略和英語線上字彙檢測成績之相關性..70 表 4-12學習風格與自我調整學習策略二因子 變異數分析摘要 表......................72 表 4-13單純主要效果變異數分析摘要表....

.....74 表 4-14學習風格與自我調整學習策略二因子變異數分析摘要 表...................

...75 表 4-15研究假設考驗情形一覽表............77 圖目錄 圖 1- 1研究流程...........

........11 圖 2- 1Kolb經驗學習環................17 圖 3- 1研究架構..........

.........43 圖 3- 2學生闖關紀錄.................58 圖 3- 3英語線上字彙檢測畫面...

..........59 圖 3- 4英語線上字彙檢測畫面.............59 REFERENCES

一、中文部分 方紫微(2000),學習輔導,第一屆大學教學方法與網路課程研討會論文集,新竹:國立交通大學。 王淑芬(2003),國小學童 學習風格與多元智能之相關研究,國立屏東師範學院數理教育研究所未出版碩士論文。 吳天方(1997),我國師範大學工業教育學生學習 風格之相關研究,教育研究資訊,5(5),114-132。 吳百薰(1998),國小學生學習風格相關因素之研究,國立台中師範學院國民教育研究 所未出版碩士論文。 吳百薰(1998),學習風格理論探究,國教輔導,37(5),47-53。 巫靜宜(2000),比較網路教學與傳統教學對學習效果 之研究-以Word 2000之教學為例,私立淡江大學資訊管理研究所未出版碩士論文。 周倩,張芳綺(2002),網路學習互動性之初探:科技 功能與認知學習,網路教學與圖書資訊學應用研討會論文集(pp. 85-101),新竹:國立新竹師範學院。 林生傳(1985),國中學生學習式態之 相關因素及其與學校教育態度、學業成就的關係,教育學刊,6,41-93。 林鳳春(2002),探討不同學習風格的國小學童運用網路教學在 動物分類學習之成效,國立台北市立師範學院科學教育研究所未出版碩士論文。 林桑瑜(2001),高中生自我調整學習策略之研究,國立 成功大學教育研究所未出版碩士論文。 林清山,程炳林(1996),國中生自我調整學習因素與學習表現之關係暨自我調整的閱讀理解教學 策略效果之研究,教育心理學報,28,15-58。 林錦雪(1994),CAI與傳統教學對不同學習風格之國小學生學習自然科學成就和態度之影 響,國立台南師範學院初等教育學系未出版碩士論文。 林麗琳(1995),國小資優班與普通班學生學習風格、學習適應與學業成就關係之 研究,國立台南師範學院初等教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。 侯玫如(2002),多重目標導向對國中生認知動機情感與學習行為之影響,

國立成功大學教育研究所未出版碩士論文。 施瀛欽(2003),不同學習風格之國小高年級學童其科學本質觀與對科學的態度之研究,國立 嘉義大學科學教育研究所未出版碩士論文。 徐善慧(1999),以學習類型理論來設計台灣現階段大學的工程教育,行政院國家科學委員會 專題研究計畫成果報告(國科會,No. NSC88-2511-S-005-001),台北:行政院國家科學委員會。 高翠霞,蔡崇建(1999),學習風格與教學設 計,教育資料與研,29,46-49。 張文華(2004),同步網路合作學習中學習風格對國小學童學習之影響,國立臺南師範學院資訊教育研究 所未出版碩士論文。 張玉茹(1997),國民中學學生英語學習動機、英語學習策略與英語學習成就相關之研究,國立高雄師範大學教育研 究所未出版碩士論文。 張春興(1996),三化取向的理論與實踐,教育心理學,台北:東華書局。 張酒雄,張玉茹(1998),國民中學學生英 語學習策略與英語學習成就相關之研究,國立高雄師範大學教育學系教育學刊,14,115-154。 張景媛(1987),教學類型與學習類型適配 性研究暨學生學習適應理論模式的驗證,國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導?究所未出版碩士論文。 張景媛(1993),國中生數學學習歷程 統整模式的驗證及應用,學生建構數學概念的分析及數學文字題教學策略的研究,國立臺灣師範大學教育心理學研究所未出版博士論文

。 教育部(2003),國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要社會學習領域,台北:教育部。 教育部(2003),國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要語 文學習領域,台北:教育部。 莊石瑛(2003),英文寫作自我效能、目標導向與自我調整學習策略之探討,國立屏東科技大學技術及職業教 育研究所未出版碩士論文。 許智豪(2004),Y世代,X世代和嬰兒潮世代學習風格分析之研究,私立淡江大學教育科技學系碩士在職專班 未出版碩士論文。 郭重吉(1987),英美等國晚近對學生學習風格之研究,資優教育季刊,22,2-8。 陳玉玲(2002),自我調整學習理論探 究及相關研究,國立高雄師範大學教育學系教育學刊,19,27-45。 陳品華(1999),二專生自我調整學習之理論建構與實證研究,國立政 治大學教育研究所未出版博士論文。 陳品華(2000),二專生自我調整學習之理論建構與實證研究,國立政治大學教育研究所未出版博士 論文。 陳淑珍(2004),不同學習風格的國小高年級學童使用數位學習系統進行水的三態教學之學習成效探討,國立新竹教育大學進修部 課程與教學未出版碩士論文。 程炳林(2002),多重目標導向,動機問題與調整策略之交互作用,師大學報,47(1),36-58。 程炳林(1995)

,自我調整學習的模式驗證及其教學效果之研究,國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所未出版博士論文。 程炳林(2001),動機,目 標設定,行動控制,學習策略之關係,自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證,師大學報,46(1),67-92。 黃玉枝(1991),國中資優學生與 普通學生學習風格及學校適應之比較研究,國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版碩士論文。 劉佩雲(1999),兒童自我調整學習之研 究,國立政治大學教育研究所未出版博士論文。 劉佩雲(2000),自我調整學習模式之驗證,教育與心理研究,23,173-206。 鄭孟 芳(2005),國小高年級學習風格、學習動機與學業成就相關研究,國立彰化師範大學生物學系未出版碩士論文。 魏麗敏(1996),影響國小 兒童數學成就之自我調節學習與情感因素分析及其策略訓練效果之研究,國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所未出版博士論文。

二、英文部分 Biggis, J. B. (1978). Individual and group difference in study prox-cesses. Britsh Journal of Educational Psychology, 48(1), 266-279 Bostrom, R. P., Olfman, L., & Sein, M. K. (1990). The importance of learning style in end-user Training. MIS Quarterly, 14(1), 101-119. Curry, L.

(1987). Integrating concepts of cognitive learning style: A review with attention to psychometric standards. Ontario, Can-ada: Canadian College of Health Service Executives. Dunn, R. & Dunn, K. (1978) Teaching their students through their in-dividual their styles. Reston VA: Resone

(3)

publishing. Dunn, R. (1983). Can students identify their own learning style? Edu-cational Leadership, 40(5), 60-62. Dunn, R. (1989). Do students from different cultures have different learning styles? International Education, 16(50), 3-7. Dunn, R. (1993). Learning style of the multiculturally diverse. Emer-gency Librarian, 20(4), 24-32. Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles:

Practical approaches for grades. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1999). The complete guide to the learning styles inservice system. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Dunn, R., & Price, G. E. (1980). The learning style characteristics of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24(1), 33-36. Dunn, R., & Reckinger, N. (1982). Learning styles. Educational Leadership, 39(1), 629-630. Dunn, R., Denig, S., & Lovelace, M. K.

(2001). Two sides of the same coin or different strokes for different folks? Teacher Librarian, 28(3), 9-15. Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. E. (1975, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1985, 1987, 1989). Learning Style Inventory. Available from Price Systems, Box 1818, Lawrence, KS 66044-1818. Dunn, R., Gemake, J., Jali, F., & Zenhausern, R. (1990, April). Cross-cultural differences in the learning styles of elemen-tary-age students of four ethnic backgrounds. Journal of Multi-cultural Counseling and Development.18(2), 68-93. Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1986). The Manual of Learning Styles. 10 Linden Avenue, Maidenhead: Peter Honey. Keefe, J. W. (1982). Assessing student learning styles: An overview of learning style and cognitive style inquiry. In National Associa-tion of Secondary School Principals (Ed.), Student learning style and brain behavior (pp. 1-2). Reston, Virginia: National Association of Secondary School Principals. Keefe, J. W. (1987). Theory and practice. Reston, Virginia: National Association of Secondary School Principals. Keefe, J, W. (1988). Profiling and Utilizing Learning Style. Reston, Virginia:NASSP. Kolb, D. A. (1976).

Organizational Psychology:A book of Readings. Sydney: Prentice-Hall. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Sydney: Prentice-Hall. Kolb, D. A. (1985). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and

development. Sydney: Prentice-Hall. Kolb, D. (1985). Learning style inventory: Self-scoring inventory and interpretation booklet. Boston: Mcber and Company Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in school science. New York: Harper & Row. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). Taking control of research on volitional control: Challenges for future theory and research. Learning and Indi-vidual Difference, 11(3), 335-355. Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.451-502). San Diego, Califor-nia: Academic Press. Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educa-tional Psychology, 92(3), 544-555. Pintrich, P. R. (2000c). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Con-temporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 92-104. Rasmussen, K. L., & Davidson-Shivers, G.

V. (1998). Hypermedia and learning Styles: Can performance be influenced?. Journal of Education Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(4), 291-308.

Sewell,T. (1986). The measurement of learning style. A critique of four assessment tools. Wisconsin: Wisconsin University. Swisher, K. (1994).

American Indian learning styles survey: An as-sessment of teachers knowledge. The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 13, 59-77. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martines-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self regulated learing strategies, phase in self regulation: shifting from process goals tooutcome goals. American Educational Research Journal. 23(4), 614-628

Zimmerman. B.J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement.In B.J. Zimmerman& Schunk. D. H. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research and practice (pp.1-25). New York: Springer-Verlag. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.13-39). San Diego, California: Academic Press. Zimmerman. B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives (2nd ed., pp.

1-38). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

參考文獻

相關文件

S3: And the products were the lipase fatty acid…no, no, fatty acid and glycerol and the enzyme remained unchanged. S1: Our enzyme was amylase and our substrate

By analyzing the lettering styles and comparing with the script, the way of lettering evolution directed another variety “Fraktur”, which became the fourth family of Gothic typefaces

Basing on the observation and assessment results, this study analyzes and discusses the effects and problems of learning the polynomial derivatives on different level students

• elearning pilot scheme (Four True Light Schools): WIFI construction, iPad procurement, elearning school visit and teacher training, English starts the elearning lesson.. 2012 •

DVDs, Podcasts, language teaching software, video games, and even foreign- language music and music videos can provide positive and fun associations with the language for

 Incorporating effective learning and teaching strategies to cater for students’ diverse learning needs and styles?.  Integrating textbook materials with e-learning and authentic

• 2) Enhancing learning and teaching of fiction and non-fiction through the use of Supported Reading as a teaching strategy and e-Learning resources.. • 3) Exploring

Kolb (2005), “Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education”, Academy of Management Learning & Education,