• 沒有找到結果。

The Impact of Automatic Speech Technology on Contrastive Stress among Adult EFL Learners 陳美、曹秀蓉

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "The Impact of Automatic Speech Technology on Contrastive Stress among Adult EFL Learners 陳美、曹秀蓉"

Copied!
3
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

The Impact of Automatic Speech Technology on Contrastive Stress among Adult EFL Learners

陳美、曹秀蓉

E-mail: [email protected]

ABSTRACT

The study aimed to explore the impact of Automatic Speech Recognition System (ASRS) on the development of English oral abilities including pronunciation, pitch, timing and emphasis for EFL college students in Taiwan. It is used ASRS—MyET to increase students’ opportunities of after-class oral practice and training in virtual learning communities. The participants were 40 freshmen at the English Department of DaYeh University in Taiwan. They were assigned into a control group and an experiment group. Each group contains 20 students, including 10 English low-proficient and 10 English high-proficient students according to their English scores of the pretest. The control group received the lecture on contrastive stress in a classroom. In addition to the lecture in a classroom as the control group, the experiment group was required after the class to practice contrastive stress with an ASRS for six weeks. After six-week treatment, all participants did a posttest. The main findings are: (1) The ASRS helps students improve their pronunciation, pitch and timing. (2) The ASRS helps low-proficient students improve their pronunciation, pitch and timing more than high-proficient students. (3) Most students held positive attitudes toward the use of ASRS. Based on the findings, some discussion of the results, pedagogical implications and suggestions for further study are proposed.

Keywords : Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) ; Automatic Speech Recognition System (ASRS) ; Oral Abilities Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS 封面內頁 簽名頁 授權書 iii 中文摘要 iv ABSTRACT………

… v ACKNOWLEDGEMENT………vi TABLE OF CONTENTS………

………vii LIST OF FIGURES………xi LIST OF TABLES ………

………xiii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the Study………1 1.2 Motivation of the Study………4 1.3 Purpose of the Study……… 5 1.4 Research Questions……… 5 1.5 Significance of the Study………6 1.6 Limitations of the Study……… 7 1.7 Definition of Terms………8 1.8 Organization of the Study……

………11 Chapter II. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Pronunciation Teaching……… 12 2.2 Application of CALL………14 2.2.1 History of CALL………14 2.2.2 Application of CALL………16 2.2.3 Characteristics of CALL………17 2.2.4 Learning Methods in CALL……… 18 2.3 ASRS on Oral Ability Development……… 21 2.3.1 Types of ASRS…

………21 2.3.2 Principles of ASRS……… 22 2.3.3 Current Application of ASRS………23 2.3.4 Studies on ASRS for Oral Development………… 24 2.4 Behaviorist Methods of Instruction…

……… 28 2.4.1 Classical Conditioning……… 28 2.4.2 Operant Conditioning ………

…30 2.4.3 Mastery Learning……… 31 Chapter III. METHODOLOGY 3.1 The Experimental Design of the Study……… 33 3.2 Participants……… 34 3.3 Experimental Materials and

Instruments………… 35 3.3.1 Handouts of Contrastive Stress……… 35 3.3.2 Pretest and Posttest………

……… 36 3.3.3 Questionnaire………37 3.3.4 Online ASRS………

……38 3.4 Procedure………45 3.5 Data Analysis………

…47 Chapter IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Investigation of Students’ Progress……… 48 4.2 Comparison between High-Proficient and Low- Proficient Group……… 53 4.3 Students’ Attitudes toward ASRS

……… 57 4.3.1 About Practicability of ASRS……… 59 4.3.2 About Opportunity Increase of Oral Practice with ASRS………60 4.3.3 About Effectiveness of ASRS………61 4.3.4 About Difficulty of Using ASRS……… 62 4.3.5 About Future Application of ASRS……… 63 Chapter V.

CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 5.1 Summary of the Findings………64 5.2 Conclusions…………

………66 5.3 Pedagogical Implications……… 67 5.4 Suggestions for Further Research……… 68 REFERENCES Chinese References……… 70 English References…

……… 73 APPENDIX A THE ORAL PRETEST..………80 APPENDIX B

(2)

THE ORAL POSTTEST A……… 82 THE ORAL POSTTEST B………86 THE ORAL POSTTEST C………89 THE ORAL POSTTEST D………

…………92 APPENDIX C QUESTIONNAIRE……… 95 REFERENCES

1.王定欽 (Ding-Chin, Wang) & 夏崇舜 (Hsia-Chung, Shun) (2003)。 使用語音辨識軟體Just Talk 提升學生英語溝通能力先期研究。親民技術 學院。 2.王黃隆 (Huang-Lung, Wang) (2003)。電腦輔助教學對國中英語低成就學生實施補救教學之效益分析。 國立高雄師範大學教育學 系碩士論文 3.石素錦 (Su-Chin, Tan) (2003)。 從認知心理與社會互動談兒童語言發展。 九年一貫新課程新趨勢國民小學英語科教材教法

。 文鶴出版有限公司。 4.自由時報(Liberty Times)。 新托福首測14人挑燈夜戰。2006.5.21 5.沈翠蓮 (Tsui-Lien, Chen) (2001)。教學原理與 設計。 五南圖書出版有限公司。 6.邱淑真 & 陳淳麗 (Shu-Zhen, Chiu & Chun Li, Chen) (2005)。數位外籍教師輔助國小英語學習的成效與 分析。發表於第十四屆國際教學研討會。 7.林寶山 (Pao-Shan, Lin) (1998)。 教學原理與技巧。 五南圖書出版有限公司。 8.施玉惠&朱惠 美 (Yu-Hui, Shih & Hui-Mei, Chu) (1999)。 國小英語課程之精神與特色。 教育研究資訊 4, 7(2),頁1-3。 9.韋金龍 (Chin-Lung, Wei) (2001)。 多媒體網路電腦在英語教學的應用。 英語教學, vol. 25(3),頁55-63。 10.張春興 (Chun-Hsing, Chang) (2004)。 教育心理學-三化 取向的理論與實踐。東華書局。 11.梁雅美 (Ya-Mei, Liang) (2003)。語音多媒體工具對國小學童英語口語表達能力之影響—Talkworks軟體 為例。國立台北師範學院論文。 12.陳錦芬 (Chin-Fen, Chen) (2003)。 電腦多媒體在英語教學上的潛能與考量。 九年一貫新課程新趨勢國 民小學英語科教材教法。 文鶴出版有限公司。 13.蔡俊傑 (Chuan-Chieh, Tsai) (1994)。電腦輔助教學的理論與實務。師友, 319,頁 9-12

。 14.聯合報(UDN)。 大學新趨勢全英語上課.2006.3.29。 15.劉顯親 (Hsien, Chin, Liu) (1993)。 互動式影碟與英語教學。英語教學 (Jan.)

,vol.17 3 ,頁20-22。 16.戴維揚 (Wei-Yang, Tai) (2003)。九年一貫英語科新課程新趨勢。九年一貫新課程新趨勢國民小學英語科教材教 法。文鶴出版有限公司。 English References 1. Abrami, P. C. (2001). Understanding and promoting complex learning using technology.

Educational Research and Evaluation, 7 (2/3), 113-136. 2. Acton, W. R., Gilbert, J., &Wong, R. (1991). Integrating pronunciation into the second language curriculum. Paper presented at the 25th Annual International TESOL Concention, New York. 3. Adam, F. ,& Aker, G. (Eds.). (1982).

Factors in adult learning and instruction. Tallahassee. FL: Florida State University, International Institute of Andragogy. 4. Ahmad, K, Corbett, G., Rogers, M., & Sussex, R. (1985). Computers, language learning and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 5. Alessi, S.

M. ,& Trollip, S. R. (1985). Computer- based instruction. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. 6. Anderson, L.W. (1993). A functional analysis of Bloom’s learning for mastery. Outcomes, 12 (2). 14-18. 7. Aviles, C. B. (2001). A study of mastery learning versus non-mastery teaching instruction in an undergraduate social work policy class. Reports Research, 143. 8. Bailey, K. M. ,& Savage, L. (1994). New ways in teaching speaking. Alexandria, VA: TESOL. 9. Beauvosi, M. H. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom:

Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25 (5), 455-464. 10. Beauvosi, M. H. (1994). E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computers and the Humanities, 28, 177-90. 11. Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching:

Computer-assisted language learning. Longman. 12. Bloom, B. S. (1974). A Introduction to mastery learning theory. In J.H Block (ED.). School, society and mastery learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston. 13. Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York:

McGraw-Hill. 14. Bloom, B, Madaus, G ,& Hastings, J. (1981). Evaluation to improve learning. New York: McGraw-Hill. 15. Bloom, B, Hastings, J. ,& Madaus, G (1971).Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill. 16. Bloom, B. S.

(1984).The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Leadership, 41 (8), 4-17. 17. Brown, H. D.

(2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. Fourth Ed. Longman. 18. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64 (8), 723-733. 19. Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classroom: Research on teaching and learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. 20. Chen, H. J. H. (2005). Developing a pronunciation practice web site based on automatic speech recognition technologies.

Paper presented at Fourteenth International Symposium on English Teaching, 29-38. 21. Chen, H. J. H. (2006). Examining the consistency of evaluation provided by three automatic speech recognition system. Paper presented at the International Conference on English Instruction and Assessment at Chung-Cheng University. 22. Chen, C. F., Fan, C. Y. ,& Lin, H. P. (1995). A new perspective on teaching English pronunciation:

Rhythm. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on English Teaching, English Teaching Association, ROC.

24-41. 23. Chiu, M. H. (1998). Increasing interactions via electronic mail. M. S. Lin, P.H. Chen, Y. N. Leung, & J. Katchen (Eds.), Paper presented at the Proceedings of the seventh International Symposium on English Teaching (Vol. I), 339-348. Taipei. 24. Chiu, T. L. (2005). Web-based speech recognition-enhanced English conversation for college learners. Paper presented at the Fourteenth International Symposium on English Teaching, 70-79. 25. Chiu, T; L. (2006). Effects Of online conversation materials with the support of speech recognition technology on college EFL learners. Master, Tsing Hua, University, Taiwan. 26. Chiu, T. L., Chung, Y., Liou, H. C, & Chen, J. C. (2006). Development of web-based conversation materials using automatic speech recognition: How to compliment. Paper presented at the International Conference on English Instruction and Assessment at Chung-Cheng University. 27. Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17-31. 28. Cobb, T. (1999). Breadth and depth of lexical acquisition with hands-on concordancing.

Computer-assisted language learning, 12 (4). 245-360. 29. Crystal, D. (1981). Clinical linguistics. New York: Harper Press. 30. Crystal, D. (1990). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (2nd Ed.). Cambridge: Brasil Blackwell. 31. Dalton, C. ,& Seidlhofer, B. (1994). Pronunciation. Oxford:

Oxford University Press. 32. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: a research-based

(3)

approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 379-397. 33. Egan, K. B. (1999). Speaking: A critical skill and a challenge. CALICO Journal. 16, 277-293. 34.

Ehsani, F. ,& Knodt, E. (1998). Speech technology in computer-aided language learning: Strengths and limitations of a new CALL paradigm.

Language learning and technology, 2 (1), 54-73. 35. Eskenazi, M. (1999a). Using automatic speech processing for foreign language pronunciation tutoring: Some issues and a prototype. Language Learning and Technology, 2 (2), 62-76. 36. Eskenazi, M. (1999b). Using a computer in foreign language pronunciation training: What advantages? CALICO Journal. 16, 447-469. 37. Garcia, M. R ,& Arias, F. V. (2000). A comparative study in motivating and learning through print-oriented and computer-oriented tests. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 13, 457-465. 38. Gimson, A. C. (1980). An introduction to the pronunciation of English. (3 nd.) London: Edward Arnold. 39. Goodwin, J. (2001). Teaching pronunciation. In M, Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second of foreign language. 117-137 Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle. 40. Guskey, T. R. (1987).

Defining the essential elements of mastery learning. Outcomes, 6 (1), 30-34. 41. Hannafin, M. J ,& Peck, K. L. (1988). The design, development, and evaluation of instruction software. NY: Macmillan. 42. Healey, D., & Johnson, N. (1995). A brief introduction to CALL. In D. Healey & N.

Johnson (Eds.), 1995 TESOL CALL interest section software list (pp. iii-vii). Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications. 43. Huang, S. Y. (1998). The value of networked computers in teaching EFL writing. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching (Vol. II), 519-528. Taipei. 44. Jenkins, J. (1998).Which pronunciation norms and models for English as an international language? , ELT Journal, 52 (2). 119-126. 45. Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically–based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an International language. Applied Linguistics, 23. 83-103. 46. Juffs, A. (1990). Tone, syllabic structure and interlanguage phonology: Chinese learners

’ errors. Internation Review of Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 99-115. 47. Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-76. 48. Kim, I. S. (2006).

Automatic speech recognition: Reliability and pedagogical implications for teaching pronunciation. Educational Technology and Society. 9 (1), 322-33. 49. Knowles, G (1987). Patterns of spoken language. New York: Longman. 50. Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A. ,& Bangert- Drowns, R.L. (1990).

Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. 60 (2). 265-299. 51. Kuo, F. J. (2004). The relationship between stress teaching and high and low achievers. Master, Department of English, National Kaohsiung Normal University. 52. Lee, L. (2002). Synchronous online exchanges: A study of modification devices on non-native discourse. System, 30(3), 275-288. 53. Levis, J (2005).

Changing context and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39. 369-377. 54. Levinson, S. ,& Liberman, M. (1981).

Speech recognition by computer. Scientific American, April, 64-76. 55. Liaw, M. L. (1998). Using electronic mail for English as a foreign language instruction. System, 26 (3), 335-51. 56. Liu, N. F ,& Littlewood, W. (1997). Why do many students appear reluctant to participate in classroom learning discourse? System, 25 (3), 371-384. 57. Mackay, I. (1985). Introducing practical phonetics. Taipei: Crane Inc. 58. Martin, J. B. ,& Joan, R.

(1999). Phonetics: The science of speech. Oxford University Press Inc. 59. Morley, J. (1991). The pronunciation component in teaching English to speakers of other languages. TESOL Quarterly, 25 (3), 481-520. 60. Murray, D. E. (2005). Teaching for learning using new technology. Paper presented at the Fourteenth International Symposium on English Teaching, 103-111. 61. Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves. L. (2002).

The pedagogy-technology interface in computer assisted pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15, 441-467. 62. Pan, C.

H. (2005). What’s wrong with EFL learners’ intonation in Taiwan: A pedagogical perspective. Paper presented at the Fourteen International Symposium and Book Fair on English Teaching. English Teachers’ Association, ROC. 202-216. 63 Pennington, M. &Richards, J. (1986).

Pronunciation revisited. TESOL Quarterly, 20. 207-226. 64. Richards, J. C. ,& Schmidt, R. (2003). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Longman. 65. Ricordati, T. H. (1996). The development, implementation, and evaluation of a mastery learning teaching. Nova Southeastern University. 66. Ritter, F. E. ,& Schooler, L. J. (2002). The learning curve. In International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. 8602-8605. Amsterdam: Pergamon. Retrieved May 20, 2007, form http:// www.iesbs.com/ 67. Schmerling, S. F. (1976). Aspects of English sentence stress. Texas: University of Texas Press. 68. Taylor, R. (1980). The computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee. New York:

Teachers College Press. 69. Tsai, P. H. (2003). A duet of pedagogy and technology—an evaluation of MyET, a computer assisted pronunciation training system made in Taiwan. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the R.O.C.. 439-452. Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung. 70. Underwood, J. (1984). Linguistics, computers and language teachers: A communicative approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 71. Wachowicz, K. A., & Scott, B. (1999). Software that listens: It’s not a question of whether; it’s a question of how. CALICO Journal, 16 (3), 253-275. 72. Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer Assisted Language Learning: An Introduction. In Fotos S. (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching, 3-20. Tokyo: Logos International. 73. Warschauer, M. (1997). The internet for English teaching: Guideline for teachers. TESL Reporter, 30 (1), 27-33. 74. Warschauer, M, & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning. Language teaching, 31, 57-71. 75. Wiburg, K. M. (2003). Technology and teaching English language learners. Pearson Education, Inc.

76. Yan, S. C. (1998). The world wide web as an EFL writing tool. Paper presented at the The Proceedings of the Seventh International

Symposium on English Teaching (Vol. II), 897-903. Taipei. 77. Yeh, D C. (2002). Evaluation of computer-assisted teaching interactive multimedia CD-ROMs of English learning: An Example of far east English reader for senior high schools. Master thesis. National Taiwan Normal University.

78. Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 2 (1), 7-27.

參考文獻

相關文件

• Formation of massive primordial stars as origin of objects in the early universe. • Supernova explosions might be visible to the most

The difference resulted from the co- existence of two kinds of words in Buddhist scriptures a foreign words in which di- syllabic words are dominant, and most of them are the

• elearning pilot scheme (Four True Light Schools): WIFI construction, iPad procurement, elearning school visit and teacher training, English starts the elearning lesson.. 2012 •

(Another example of close harmony is the four-bar unaccompanied vocal introduction to “Paperback Writer”, a somewhat later Beatles song.) Overall, Lennon’s and McCartney’s

Microphone and 600 ohm line conduits shall be mechanically and electrically connected to receptacle boxes and electrically grounded to the audio system ground point.. Lines in

The min-max and the max-min k-split problem are defined similarly except that the objectives are to minimize the maximum subgraph, and to maximize the minimum subgraph respectively..

In view of this, this paper attempt to explore the impact of service quality, product involvement, perceive risk on purchase intention.. For affected consumer’s major factor in

In addition, the degree of innovation management implementation has essential impact on the two dimensions of competitiveness including technological innovation and