Uncategorized References
1. Lozano, R., et al., Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, 2012. 380(9859): p. 2095-128.
2. Muir, A.J., The rapid evolution of treatment strategies for hepatitis C. The American journal of gastroenterology, 2014. 109(5): p. 628-635.
3. Law, J.L.M., et al., A hepatitis C virus (HCV) vaccine comprising envelope glycoproteins gpE1/gpE2 derived from a single isolate elicits broad cross-genotype neutralizing antibodies in humans. PloS one, 2013. 8(3): p. e59776.
4. Feld, J.J. and J.H. Hoofnagle, Mechanism of action of interferon and ribavirin in treatment of hepatitis C. Nature, 2005. 436(7053): p. 967.
5. Scheel, T.K. and C.M. Rice, Understanding the hepatitis C virus life cycle paves the way for highly effective therapies. Nat Med, 2013. 19(7): p. 837-49.
6. Wilkins, T., et al., Hepatitis C: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician, 2010. 81(11): p. 1351-7.
7. Maheshwari, A., S. Ray, and P.J. Thuluvath, Acute hepatitis C. Lancet, 2008.
372(9635): p. 321-32.
8. Chen, J.Y. and R.T. Chung, Future classes of hepatitis C virus therapeutic agents. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 2012. 26(4): p. 949-66.
9. Datta, S., et al., Case-finding for hepatitis C in primary care: a mixed-methods service evaluation. Br J Gen Pract, 2014. 64(619): p. e67-74.
10. Washburn, M.P., D. Wolters, and J.R. Yates, 3rd, Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat Biotechnol, 2001. 19(3): p. 242-7.
11. Zhang, X., et al., Multi-dimensional liquid chromatography in proteomics--a review. Anal Chim Acta, 2010. 664(2): p. 101-13.
12. Sestak, J., D. Moravcova, and V. Kahle, Instrument platforms for nano liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A, 2015. 1421: p. 2-17.
13. Peng, J., et al., Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis:
the yeast proteome. J Proteome Res, 2003. 2(1): p. 43-50.
14. Xu, P., D.M. Duong, and J. Peng, Systematical optimization of reverse-phase
63
chromatography for shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res, 2009. 8(8): p.
3944-50.
15. Zizzo, A.N., et al., A national retrospective study of paediatric end-stage liver disease as a predictor of change to second-line therapy in children with autoimmune hepatitis. Liver Int, 2017.
16. Yang, F., et al., High-pH reversed-phase chromatography with fraction concatenation for 2D proteomic analysis. Expert Rev Proteomics, 2012. 9(2):
p. 129-34.
17. Spicer, V., et al., 3D HPLC-MS with Reversed-Phase Separation Functionality in All Three Dimensions for Large-Scale Bottom-Up Proteomics and Peptide Retention Data Collection. Anal Chem, 2016. 88(5):
p. 2847-55.
18. Kirkland, J.J., M.A. van Straten, and H.A. Claessens, High pH mobile phase effects on silica-based reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic columns. Journal of Chromatography A, 1995. 691(1): p.
3-19.
19. Hubner, N.C., S. Ren, and M. Mann, Peptide separation with immobilized pI strips is an attractive alternative to in-gel protein digestion for proteome analysis. PROTEOMICS, 2008. 8(23-24): p. 4862-4872.
20. Horth, P., et al., Efficient fractionation and improved protein identification by peptide OFFGEL electrophoresis. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2006. 5(10): p.
1968-74.
21. Kopaciewicz, W., et al., Retention model for high-performance ion-exchange chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A, 1983. 266: p. 3-21.
22. Dowell, J.A., et al., Comparison of two-dimensional fractionation techniques for shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem, 2008. 80(17): p. 6715-23.
23. Lau, E., et al., Combinatorial use of offline SCX and online RP-RP liquid chromatography for iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomics applications. Mol Biosyst, 2011. 7(5): p. 1399-408.
24. Edman, P., Method for determination of the amino acid sequence in peptides.
Acta chem. scand, 1950. 4(7): p. 283-293.
25. Ma, B., et al., PEAKS: powerful software for peptide de novo sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 2003. 17(20): p. 2337-2342.
26. Henzel, W.J., et al., Identifying proteins from two-dimensional gels by molecular mass searching of peptide fragments in protein sequence databases.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1993. 90(11): p.
5011-64
5015.
27. Thiede, B., et al., Peptide mass fingerprinting. Methods, 2005. 35(3): p. 237-247.
28. Eng, J.K., A.L. McCormack, and J.R. Yates, An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 1994.
5(11): p. 976-989.
29. Märk, T.D. and G.H. Dunn, Electron impact ionization. 2013: Springer Science & Business Media.
30. Harrison, A.G., Chemical ionization mass spectrometry. 1992: CRC press.
31. Kaufmann, R., Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry: a novel analytical tool in molecular biology and biotechnology.
Journal of biotechnology, 1995. 41(2-3): p. 155-175.
32. Fenn, J.B., et al., Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science, 1989. 246(4926): p. 64-71.
33. Wilm, M.S. and M. Mann, Electrospray and Taylor-Cone theory, Dole's beam of macromolecules at last? International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Processes, 1994. 136(2-3): p. 167-180.
34. Kaltashov, I.A. and R.R. Abzalimov, Do ionic charges in ESI MS provide useful information on macromolecular structure? Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2008. 19(9): p. 1239-1246.
35. Schwartz, J.C., M.W. Senko, and J.E. Syka, A two-dimensional quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2002. 13(6): p. 659-669.
36. Hager, J.W., A new linear ion trap mass spectrometer. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2002. 16(6): p. 512-526.
37. Wells, J.M. and S.A. McLuckey, Collision‐induced dissociation (CID) of peptides and proteins. Methods in enzymology, 2005. 402: p. 148-185.
38. Wu, W.W., et al., Discovery-and target-based protein quantification using iTRAQ and pulsed Q collision induced dissociation (PQD). Journal of proteomics, 2012. 75(8): p. 2480-2487.
39. Wasinger, V.C., et al., Progress with gene‐product mapping of the Mollicutes:
Mycoplasma genitalium. Electrophoresis, 1995. 16(1): p. 1090-1094.
40. Anderson, N.L. and N.G. Anderson, Proteome and proteomics: new technologies, new concepts, and new words. Electrophoresis, 1998. 19(11):
p. 1853-1861.
41. Fenselau, C. and X. Yao, Proteolytic Labeling With 18 O for Comparative
65
Proteomics Studies: Preparation of 18 O-Labeled Peptides and the 18 O/16 O Peptide Mixture. Quantitative Proteomics by Mass Spectrometry, 2007: p.
135-142.
42. Heller, M., et al., Trypsin catalyzed 16 O-to-18 O exchange for comparative proteomics: tandem mass spectrometry comparison using MALDI-TOF, ESI-QTOF, and ESI-ion trap mass spectrometers. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2003. 14(7): p. 704-718.
43. Gygi, S.P., et al., Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nature biotechnology, 1999. 17(10): p. 994-999.
44. Thompson, A., et al., Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Analytical chemistry, 2003. 75(8): p. 1895-1904.
45. Evans, C., et al., An insight into iTRAQ: where do we stand now? Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2012. 404(4): p. 1011-1027.
46. Choo, Q.-L., et al., Isolation of a cDNA Clone Derived from a Blood-Borne Non-A, Non-B Viral Hepititis Genome. Science, 1989. 244(4902): p. 359.
47. Kuo, G., et al., An assay for circulating antibodies to a major etiologic virus of human non-A, non-B hepatitis. Science, 1989: p. 362-364.
48. Tsai, P., et al., Viral dynamics of persistent hepatitis C virus infection in high-sensitive reporter cells resemble patient's viremia. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, 2017.
49. Casey, T.M., et al., Analysis of Reproducibility of Proteome Coverage and Quantitation Using Isobaric Mass Tags (iTRAQ and TMT). Journal of Proteome Research, 2017. 16(2): p. 384-392.
50. Pichler, P., et al., Peptide labeling with isobaric tags yields higher identification rates using iTRAQ 4-plex compared to TMT 6-plex and iTRAQ 8-plex on LTQ Orbitrap. Analytical chemistry, 2010. 82(15): p.
6549-6558.
51. Chenau, J., et al., Peptides OFFGEL electrophoresis: a suitable pre-analytical step for complex eukaryotic samples fractionation compatible with quantitative iTRAQ labeling. Proteome science, 2008. 6(1): p. 9.
66
附表
表 7 第三組(Day30,81)iTRAQ 標記定量蛋白質結果