• 沒有找到結果。

依據研究結果,提出未來研究與實際應用之建議等兩部分陳述如下:

一、未來研究建議方面

本研究瞭解自我效能在動作學習過程中會受到結果獲知的影響,且結果獲知也會造 成動作學習有差異,但是自我效能和結果獲知對於動作學習的影響程度尚未釐清,也就 是未知自我效能的提升和結果獲知的給予何者是影響動作學習的主要變項,未來研究可 探討自我效能是否為動作學習的中介變項,確認自我效能及結果獲知在動作學習過程中

的角色。

二、實際應用建議方面

本研究瞭解結果獲知會改變動作學習過程中的自我效能,而自我效能會影響學習的 態度,例如傾向付出較多的時間學習等 (Bandura, 1977),此時教師及運動教練等的教學 者應注重學習者自我效能,提升學習者自我效能,有助於學習者動作學習。

引用文獻

Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111-150.

Á vila, L. T. G., Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Positive social-comparative feedback enhances motor learning in children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 849-853.

Baddeley, A. D., & Longman, D. J. A. (1978). The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. Ergonomics, 21, 627-635.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, Vol. 4 (pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT:

Information Age.

Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9-44. doi: 10.1177/0149206311410606.

Bandura, A., & Wood, R. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 805-814.

Buekers, M. J., & Magill, R. A. (1995). The role of task experience and prior knowledge for detecting invalid augmented feedback while learning a motor skill. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, Human Experimental Psychology, 48, 84-97. doi: 10.1080/14640749508401377

Buekers, M. J., Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1992). The effect of erroneous knowledge of results on skill acquisition when augmented information is redundant. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, Human Experimental Psychology, 44, 105-117. doi: 10.1080/14640749208401285

Buekers, M. J., Magill, R. A., & Sneyers, K. M. (1994). Resolving a conflict between sensory feedback and knowledge of results, while learning a motor skill. Human Movement Science, 26, 27–35.

Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. (1987). The measurement of handedness. Brain and Cognition, 6, 175-183.

Chiviacowsky, S. (2014). Self-controlled practice: Autonomy protects perceptions of competence and enhances motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15, 505-510. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.05.003

Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2007). Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78, 40-47.

Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Self-controlled learning: The importance of protecting perceptions of competence. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 458.

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00458

Choi, Y., Qi, F., Gordon, J., & Schweighofer, N. (2008). Performance-based adaptive schedules enhance motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40, 273-280. doi:

10.3200/JMBR.40.4.273-280

Cummings, L. L., Schwab, D. P., & Rosen, M. (1971). Performance and knowledge of results as determinants of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 526-530.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

Feltz, D. L. (1984). Self-efficacy as a cognitive mediator of athletic performance. In W. F.

Straub & J. M. Williams (Eds.), Cognitive sport psychology (pp. 191–198). Lansing, NY: Sport Science Associates.

Feltz, D. L., & Chase, M. A, (1998). The measurement of self-efficacy and confidence in sport. In J. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 65-80). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technologies.

Holloway, J. B., Beuter, A., & Duda, J. L. (1988). Self-efficacy and training for strength in adolescent girls. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 699-719.

Janelle, C. M., Kim, J., & Singer, R. N. (1995). Subject controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 627-634.

Maibach, E., & Murphy, D. A. (1995). Self-efficacy in health promotion research and practice: Conceptualization and measurement. Health Education Research, 10, 7-50.

Moritz, S. E., Feltz, D. L., Fahrbach, K. R., & Mack, D. E. (2000). The relation of

self-efficacy measures to sport performance: A meta-analytic review. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 280-294.

Naghsh, Z., Tababaee, M. G., & Tarkhan, R. A. (2011). Structural model of the relationship between self-efficacy perceived instrumentality and academicachievement: Investigating the mediating role of self-regulating learning. Advances in Cognitive Science, 12(4), 1-9.

Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory.

Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4

Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.

Ryan, L. J., Henry, K., Robey, T., & Edwards, J. A. (2004). Resolution of conflicts between internal and external information sources on a time reproduction task: The role of perceived information reliability and attributional style. Acta Psychologica, 117, 205-229. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.06.005

Ryan, L. J., & Robey, T. B. (2002). Learning and performance effects of accurate and erroneous knowledge of results on time perception. Acta Psychologica, 111, 83-100.

Saemi, E., Porter, J. M.,Ghotbi-Varzaneh, A., Zarghami, M., & Maleki, F. (2012). Knowledge of results after relatively good trials enhances self-efficacy and motor learning.

Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 378-382. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.12.008

Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355-386.

Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.

Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2011). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2000). Motor learning and performance: A problem-based learning approach (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Swinnen, S. P. (1996). Information feedback for motor skill learning: A review. In H. N.

Zelaznik (Eds.), Advance in motor learning and control (pp. 37-66). Champaign, IL:

Human Kinetics.

Wulf, G., & Adams, N. (2014). Small choices can enhance balance learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70, 265-272.

Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Cardozo, P. L. (2014). Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning. Human Movement Science, 37, 12-20.

doi:10.1016/j.humov.2014.06.004

Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Drews, R. (2015). External focus and autonomy support: Two important factors in motor learning have additive benefits. Human Movement Science, 40, 176-184.

Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Normative feedback effects on the learning of a timing task. Human Movement Science, 38, 235-240.

Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Altering mindset can enhance motor learning in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 27, 14-21.

附錄一

參與研究知情同意書

您好:

非常感謝您參與本研究,本實驗旨在瞭解伸展動作的練習判斷力,第一天實驗約需 20分鐘,需要您填寫自我效能量表及練習伸展動作;第二天實驗約需10分鐘,需要您填 寫自我效能量表及進行伸展動作測驗,實驗過程不會對人體健康造成任何傷害,如果您 在實驗過程中感到身體不適,可以隨時告知研究人員,終止或退出本研究。此研究結果 僅供學術參考,您的資料將妥善保管,未來本研究公開發表或出版時亦不會顯現您的基 本資料。

感謝您的參與!

研 究 員:林 逸 電話:7734-3224 手機:0988257401 指導老師:卓俊伶博士 電話:7734-3201 手機:0955532385 單 位:國立臺灣師範大學體育學系

--- 《參加者知情同意書》

編號: 號 經過閱讀,並且瞭解以上陳述,我願意參與本研究。

姓 名:

出生日期: 年 月 日 電話:

附錄二

慣用手檢定問卷

請您依照一般日常生活習慣,迅速回答下列問題,謝謝!

一般我較常採用?手從事下列活動:(請勾選)

右手 左手 1 寫字

2 畫東西 3 丟擲東西 4 使用剪刀 5 拿牙刷

6 拿刀子(無使用叉子的情況下) 7 拿湯匙

8 拿掃帚(在上的手) 9 拿火柴點火

10 開盒子或瓶子的蓋子

編號: 姓名:

附錄三

供實驗參與者參考之距離資料。

附錄四

表4 保留測驗變異誤差之單因子變異數分析摘要

變異來源 SS df MS F η2

組間 2.67 2 1.34 4.01* .21 組內 10.00 30 .33

全體 12.67 32

表5 保留測驗絕對誤差與變異誤差之組間主要效果事後比較

組別 M 正向組 負向組 正確組

絕對誤差

正向組 1.48 - * *

負向組 3.35 - *

正確組 2.24 -

變異誤差

正向組 1.38 - * -

負向組 2.07 - *

正確組 1.63 -

*p < .05

表6 自我效能與絕對誤差、變異誤差之迴歸係數摘要表

相關文件