第五章 結論與建議

第二節 後續研究建議

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

第五章 結論與建議

第二節 後續研究建議

本研究採用實價登錄資料分析影響花蓮縣農地價格之資料,由於需要許多 距離資料,因此運用實價登錄資料內之座標進行定位。但由於個資法之限制,

此座標經過模糊化,代表其存在一定範圍內之誤差,可能在透過 Arcgis 進行距 離之計算時,與實際距離將有所誤差。因此,如能取得更精確之座標或距離計 算之方式,將使實證結果更為準確。

又本研究由於資料之限制,將自然景觀變數簡化僅剩「自海岸之距離」,而 於文獻回顧中可知,衡量景觀方式還有視線、等級等。因此,未來如能透過現 堪或訪談方式,取得更多種類衡量自然景觀變數之方式,應可更加深入探討影 響花蓮縣農地價格之自然景觀因素。

花蓮縣與台東縣同屬東部區域計畫範圍,其自然條件及農地市場之性質應 較為接近,因此,如能將台東納入範圍,對於我國東部農地之研究將更具整體 性,並得更深入探討自然景觀對於我國東部農地價格之影響。

56

土地金融季刊』,31(1):75-97。

5.梁仁旭、陳奉瑤,2014,『不動產估價』第三版,臺北市:財團法人中國地政

8.黃炳文,2005,農地興建農舍的課題與調整方向,『農業世界』,278:93-97。

9.楊佩欣,2007,「住商混合使用對房價之影響─台北市經驗」,國立政治大學碩 士論文。

10.劉健哲、黃炳文,2004,「農地管理政策與興建舍問題之研究」,『社經法制 論叢』,34:305-336。

11.劉健哲、黃炳文,2005,農地管理政策與農地興建農舍問題之研究,『經社 法治叢論』,34:305-336

12.趙蕙萍,1992,「臺灣農地價格之研究」,臺灣大學農業經濟系碩士論文。

英文參考文獻

1.Alston,J.M., 1986,“An Analysis of Growth of U.S. Farmland Prices”,1963–

82,American Journal of Agricultural Economics,68(1):1-9.

I

2.Brown,G.M., and Pollakowski, H.O., 1977,”Economic Valuation of Shoreline”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 59(3):272–278.

3.Benson,E.D.,Hansen,J.L.,Schwertz,A.L., and Smersh,G.T.,1998,” Pricing Residential Amenities:The Value of a View”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,16(1):55-73.

4.Bond,M.T., Seiler,V.L., and Seiler,M.J.,2002,” Residential Real Estate Prices:a Room With a View”, Journal of Real Estate Research,23(1-2):129-138.

5.Boris, P.,Yakov,O., and Larissa,F.,2005,” Factors Affecting Housing Modifications and Housing Pricing: A Case Study of Four Residential Neighborhoods in Haifa, Israel”, Journal of Real Estate Research,27(4):371-407.

6.Boxall,P.C., Chan,W.H., and McMillan,M.L.,2005,”The Impact of Oil and Natural Gas Facilities on Rural Residential Property Values: a Spatial Hedonic Analysis”, Resource and Energy Economics,27(3):248–269.

7.Beron,K.,Murdoch,J., and Thayer,M.,2001,”The Benefit Visibility Improvement:

New Evidence From The Los Angeles Metropolitan Area”, J. Real Estate Finance Econ,22(2):319–337.

8.Chicoine,D.L., 1981,” Farmland Values at The Urban Fringe:An Analysis of Sale Prices”, Land Economics,57(3):353-362.

9.Correll,M.R., Lillydahl, J.H. and Singell, L.D.,19 78,”The Effects of Gre en belts on Residential Property Values:Some Findings on the Political Economy of Open Space”, Land Economics,54(2),207-217.

10.Cheshire, P.C. and Sheppard,S.,2002,”Welfare Economics of Land Us e Regulation”, Journal of Urban Economics,52:242–269.

11. Cassel, E.,Mendelsohn,R.,1985,”The choice of functional forms for hedonic price equations: comment”, J. Urban Econ.,18(2):135–142.

12.Drescher,K.,Henderson,J., and McNamara,K.,2001,” Farmland Prices Determinants”, American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting,Chicago,Illinois,Auguest5-8,2001.

13.David Maddison,2000,” A Hedonic Analysis of Agricultural Land Prices in England and Wales”, European Review of Agricultural Economics,27(4):519-532.

II

15.Fennema,A.T.,Veeneklaas,F.R.,Vreke,J.,1996,”Meerwaarde Woningen Door Nabijheid Nan Groen (Surplus Value of Dwellings in The Vicinity of Green Areas )”,Stedebouw en Ruimtelijke Ordening,77(3):33-35.

16.Gibbons, S., Mourato, S., and Resende,G.,2011,” The Amenity Value of English Nature:A Hedonic Price Approach”, Environmental and Resource Economics,57(2):

175-196.

17.Garrod,G.D., and Willis, K.G.,1992,”The Envir onmental Economic Imp act of Woodland: A Two State Hedonic Price Model of The Amenity Value of Forestry in Britain”, Applied Economics,24(7):715-728.

18.Gatto, M., De Leo,G.A.,2000,”Pricing Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: The Neverending Story”, Bioscience 50:347–355.

19. Gujarati, D. N, 2003, Basic Econometrics.4th Edition, McGraw-Hill International Edition.

20.Huang,H.,Miller,G.Y.,Sherrick,B.J., and Gomez,M.I.,2006, “Factors Influencing Illinois Farmland Values”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(2)458-470.

21. Jacqueline M. Hamilton, 2007,”Coastal Landscape and The Hedonic Price of Accommodation”, Ecological Economics,62(5):594-602.

22.Jim,C.Y. and Wendy, Y.C., 2009,” Value of Scenic Views:Hedonic Assessment of Private Housing in Hong Kong”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 91(4):226-234.

23.Jim,C.Y. and Wendy, Y.C., 2007,”Consumption Preferences and Environmental Externalities: a Hedonic Analysis of The Housing Market in Guangzhou”,

Geoforum,38(2):414-431.

24..Kask, S.B.,Maani,A.,1992,”Uncertainty,Information and Hedonic Pricing”, Land Economics,68(2):170–184.

25..Kulshreshtha, S.N., and Gillies,J.A.,1993,”Economic Evaluation of Aesthetic Amenities: A Case Study of River View”, Water Resources Bulletin,29(2): 257–266.

26. Livanis,G.,Moss,C.B.,Breneman,V.E.,and Nehring,R.F.,2006,” Urban Sprawl And Farmland Prices”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics,88(4),915-929.

III

27. Lutzenhiser,Margot, and Netusil, N.R., 2001,”The Effect of Open Spaces on a Home's Sal e Price”, Contemporary Economic Policy,19(3):291–298.

28. Luttik,J.,2000,” The Value of Trees, Water and Open Space as Reflected by House Prices in The Netherlands”, Landscape and Urban Planning,48(3-4):161-167.

29. Lake,I.R.,Andrew A. Lovett, Ian J. Bateman, and Brett H.Day.,2000, “Using GIS and Large-Scale Digital Data to Implement Hedonic Pricing Studies”, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(6):521–541.

30. Leggett, C.G.,Bockstael,N.E.,2000,”Evidence of The Effects of Water Quality on Residential Land Prices”, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 39(2):121–144.

31..Malpezzi, S,2002 , ”Hedonic Pricing Models: A Selective and Applied Review” , The Center for Urban Land Economics Research, 20-21.

32.Moss,C.B., 1997,“Returns, Interest Rates, and Inflation:How They Explain Changes in Agricultural land Values”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(5):1311-1318.

33..McLeod,P.B., 1984,”The Demand for Local Amenity: An Hedonic Price Analysis”, Environment and Planning A, 16 (3):389–400.

34..Plattner,R.H., and Campbell, T.J.,1978,”A Study of the Effect of Water View on Site Value”, Appraisal Journal, 46 (1):20-25.

35..Paterson, R.W., and Boyle,K.J.,2002,”Out of Sight, Out of Mind? Using GIS to Incorporate Visibility in Hedonic Property Value Models”,Land Economics,78(3)

: 417-425.

36..Rodriguez, M., and Sirmans, C.F.,1994,”Quantifying the Value of a View in Single-Family Housing Markets”, Appraisal Journal,62(4):600-603.

37..Rosen, S.,1974,”Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition”, J. Polit. Economy,82(1):34–55.

38..Stewart,P.A. and Libby, L.W., 1998,“Determinants of Farm Land Value:The Case of DeKalb County, Illinois”, Review of Agricultural Economics,20(1): 80-95.

39.Tyrvainen, L.,1997,” T he Amenit y Value of the Urban Forest: An Applic ation of the Hedonic Pricin g Method ”, Landscape and Urban Planning,37(3-4):211–222.

40.Tyrvainen, L., and An tti,M.,2000,”Propert y Pri ces and U rban Forest Am eniti es”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39(2):205–23.

IV

‧ 國

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

網頁參考文獻

1.遠見雜誌,104 年 10 月 25,「六大亂象難遏止,台灣快沒耕地可用!」,2015 年 8 月號:http://www.gvm.com.tw/Boardcontent_29205.html。

V

在文檔中 自然景觀與農地管制如何影響農地價格 ─花蓮縣的個案 - 政大學術集成 (頁 68-73)