第六章 研究結論與建議
第二節 未來研究建議
本研究主要係針對具單一中介變項的結構方程模式設計做深入探討，其具有 三個潛在變項與九個服從常態分配的連續觀測變項，在不同路徑係數的設計下，
進行模擬研究，對於其他的模式設定，其推論力仍需進一步作驗證。而對於後續 之相關研究，有以下幾點建議：
一、 本研究所設定的模式為具有潛在中介變項的模式中較基本且具代表性的模 式，故後續的研究中，可針對較複雜的模式作深入研究。例如：模式中具 有兩個以上的潛在中介變項等。
二、 本研究所模擬的觀測變項為服從常態分配的連續變數，未來可將觀測變項 設定為二元或類別資料進行深入研究。
三、 目前國內參與許多大型調查資料庫的研究測驗。例如：國際數學與科學教 育成就趨勢調查(Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study，簡稱 TIMSS)、國際評量計畫（The Programme for International Student Assessment，
簡稱 PISA）、台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫(Taiwan Education Panel Survey，簡
稱 TEPS）等。可將本研究的模式套用於資料庫中，探討影響學童學習成就 的因子，對未來教育發展將有所助益。
參考文獻
中文文獻
白豐銘 (2006)。卡方差異檢定應用於認知神經連結檢測之模擬研究。國立台中教 育大學碩士論文。
李默英 (1983)。年級、性別、角色、數學學習態度與數量成就的關係。國立政治 大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
張春興 (1989)。張氏心理學辭典。台北：東華書局。
蔡良庭、楊志堅、王文中、施慶麟 (2008)。應用 MIMIC 模式評估方法以檢驗試 題差異性之研究。測驗學刊。 55 (2)，287-311。
英文文獻
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
Aroian, L. A. (1944). The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 265–271.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Beauducel, A. & Wittmann, W. W. (2005). Simulation study on fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis based on data with slightly distorted simple structure.
Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 41-75
Bentler, P. (1997). EQS for Windows (Version 5.6) [Computer software]. Encino, CA:
Multivariate Software.
Bollen, K. A. (1987). Total, Direct, and Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models.
Sociological Methodology, 17, 37-69.
Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. (1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociological Methodology, 20, 115-140.
Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational
Research Methods, 11, 296-325.
Cheung, M. W.-L. (2007). Comparison of approaches to constructing confidence intervals for mediating effects using structural equation models. Structural
Equation Modeling, 14, 227-246.
Clogg, C. C., Petkova, E., & Shihadeh, E. S. (1992). Statistical Methods for Analyzing Collapsibility in Regression Models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 51-74.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Collins, L. M., Graham, J. W., & Flaherty, B. P. (1998). An alternative framework for defining mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 295-312.
Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indices to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited.
Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 343-367.
Folmer, H. (1981). Measurement of the effects of regional policy instruments by means of linear structural equation models and panel data. EEnvironment and
Planning A, 13, 1435-1448.
Freedman L.S. & Schatzkin A. (1992). Sample size for studying intermediate endpoints within intervention trails or observational studies. Am J Epidemiol, 136, 1148-1159.
Goodman, L. A. (1960). On the exact variance of products. Journal of' the American
Statistical Association, 55, 708-713.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with
readings. New York: Macmillan.
Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statisticalclarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 4, 599-610.
Hoyle, R. H., & Smith, G. T. (1994). Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: A conceptual overview. Journal of Consulting and
Clinical Psychology, 62, 429-440.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation
Modeling, 6, 1-55.
Iacobucci, D., Saldanha, N., & Deng, X. (2007). A meditation on mediation: Evidence that structural equations models perform better than regressions. Journal of
consumer Psychology, 17, 140-154.
James, L. R. & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 307-321 .
Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602-619.
Kadijevich, D. (2006). Developing trustworthy TIMSS background measures: A case study on mathematics attitude. The Teaching of Mathematics, 9, 41-51.
Kadijevich, D. (2008). TIMSS 2003: Relating dimensions of mathematics attitude to mathematics achievement. Zbornik instituta za pedago
ka istraivanja, 40,
327-346.Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social
psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Lomnicki, Z. A. (1967). On the distribution of products of random variables. Journal
of the Royal Statistical Society B, 29, 513-524.
MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95-107.
MacKinnon, D. P. (1994). Analysis of mediating variables in prevention and intervention research. NIDA Research Monograph, 139, 127-153
MacKinnon, D. P. (2000). Contrasts in multiple mediator models. In J. Rose, L.
Chassin, C. C. Presson, & S. J. Sherman (Eds.), Multivariate applications in
NJ: Erlbaum.
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
MacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimating mediating effects in prevention studies. Evalualion Review, 17, 144-158.
MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173-181.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V.
(2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate
Behavioral Research, 39, 99-128.
MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41-62.
Maxwell, S. E., Kelley, K., & Rausch, J. R. (2008). Sample size planning for statistical power and accuracy in parameter estimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 537-563.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2006). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles:
Muthén & Muthén.
Olkin, I., & Finn, J. D. (1995). Correlations redux. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 155-164.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods,
Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717-731.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior
Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312.
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification. Multivariate
Behavioral Research, 25, 214-12.
Stone, C. A., & Sobel, M. E. (1990). The robustness of estimates of total indirect cffects in covariance structure models estimated by maximum likelihood.
Psychomerrika, 55, 337-352.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Homework pratices and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and perceived responsibility beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 397-417.