未來展望

根據學生們的回應與研究檢討中所提到的問題，在系統建構的部分可做一改善。一 方面提供簡便快速的操作模式（包含指令的數量與長度、重新設計組內溝通的方法等），

另一方面誠如多數人所建議，可以配合場景加入一些圖片，甚至是聲音、動畫。畢竟圖 形化是一種發展的趨勢，教科書都普遍增加色彩與圖片了，各何況與五光十色的網路世 界相比，純文字化的教學活動環境已不再能滿足大眾的胃口了。因此使用操作簡便且圖 形化後的系統，也許可提升學生們於合作過程中頻繁互動的意願。

規劃系統機制使其可以自動捕捉小組合作互動模式為另一個值得深入研究的部 分。互動頻率值運作機制是本研究中所嘗試設計的，僅初步地獲知組員間互動的頻率，

沒有針對對話內容進行分析。倘若能夠設法加入自動化分析的機制，相信會對合作過程 的評估工作有很大的助益。當然也已有關於這方面的研究了（例如：G.. K. W. K. Chung et al., 1999）。不過所採用的方法是事先歸類所有可能用到的對話句型，並將它們內建 在系統中。缺點是使用者的溝通侷限於這些內建的句子裡，無法任意交談。為了符合網 路中介模擬環境所擁有的「模擬」特性，必須秉持於自然狀況下，提供毫無限制的溝通 環境的原則。那麼，想在這種狀況下交由系統正確地評估小組合作互動過程，將成為一 項頗具難度的課題了。

參考文獻

Blaney, N. T., Stephan, S., Rosenfield, D., Aronson, E., & Sikes, J. (1977). Interdependence in the classroom: A field study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(2), pp. 121-128.

Brush, T. A. (1998). Embedding cooperative learning into the design of integrated learning system: rationale and guidelines. Educational Technology Research & Development, 46(3), pp. 5-18.

Carrier, C. A. & Sales, G. C. (1987). Pair versus individual work on the acquisition of concepts in a computer-based instructional lesson. Journal of Computer-based Instruction, 14, pp. 11-17.

Chambers, B. & Abrami, P. C. (1991). The relationship between student team learning outcomes and achievement, causal attributions, and affect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, pp. 140-146.

Chen, G. D., Wang, C. Y., & Ou, K. L. (2003). Using group communication to monitor web-based group learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(4), pp. 401-415.

Cohen, E.G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: conditions for productive small groups.

Review of Educational Research, 64(1), pp. 1-35.

Cooper, C. R., Marquis, A., & Edward, D. (1986). Four perspectives on peer learning among elementary school children. In E. C. Mueller & C. R. Cooper (Eds.), Process and outcome in peer relationships. pp. 269-298. New York: Academic Press.

Curtis & Pavel. (1992). Mudding: social phenomena in text-based virtual realities.

Proceedings of the conference on Directions and Implications of Advanced Computing.

Curtis, P. & Nichols, D. A. (1993). MUDs grow up: Social virtual reality in the real world.

Xerox PARC.

Dalton, D. W., Hannafin, M. J., & Hooper, S. (1989). Effects of individual and cooperative

computer-assisted instruction on student performance and attitudes. Educational Technology Research & Development, 37(2), pp. 15-24.

G.K. W. K. Chung, H. F. O’Neil, Jr., & H. E. Herl. (1999). The use of computer-based collaborative knowledge mapping to measure team processes and team outcomes.

Computers in Human Behavior, 15, pp. 463-493.

Hsieh, C. H. & Sun, C. T. (2004). MUD for learning: Classification and instruction. To appear in International Journal of Instructional Media, 33(3).

Huxham, M. & Land, R. (2000). Assigning student in group work projects. Can we do better than random? Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(1), pp. 17-22.

Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. (1987). Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. (1992). Positive interdependence: the heart of cooperative learning. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d ’Apollonia, S. (1996).

Within-class grouping: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), pp.

423-458.

Milson, Fred. (1973). An introduction to group work skill. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Morgan, B. B. Jr., Salas, E., & Glickman, A. S. (1993). An analysis of team evolution and maturation. Journal of General Psychology, 120(3), 277-291.

Nunamaker, J. F. Jr., Dennis, A. R., Valacish, J. S., Vogel, D. R., & George, J. F. (1991).

Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM, 34(7), pp.

40-61.

Oetzel, J. G.. (1998). Culturally homogeneous and heterogeneous groups: explaining communication processes through individualism-collectivism and self-construcal.

International Jouranl Intercultural Rel., 22(2), pp. 135-161.

O’Neil, H. F. Jr., Chung, G.., & Brown, R. (1997). Use of networked simulations as a context to measure team competencies. In H. F. Jr. O’Neil, Workforce readiness: competencies and assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 411-452.

Palmer, J. D. & Fields, N. A. (1994). Guest editor’s introduction: computer-supported cooperative work. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), pp. 15-17.

Reid & Elizabeth. (1999). Hierarchy and power: social control in cyberspace. In Communities in cyberspace. London: Routledge. pp. 107-133.

Rheingold & Howard. (1993). The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. (Out of print, can be found online:

http://www.well.com/user/hlr/vcbook/).

Robert E. Slavin. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), pp.

315-342.

Robert E. Slavin. (1995). Cooperative learning: theory, research, and practice. Allyn and Bacon.

Roth, W. M. (1995). Authentic school science-knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.

Stone, Allucquere Rosanne. (1991). Will the real body please stand up? Boundary stories about virtual cultures. In Cyberspace: first steps. MA: MIT Press. pp. 81-181.

Suler & John. (1996). Life at the palace: a cyber psychology case study.

(http://www.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/palacestudy.html).

Turkle & Sherry. (1999). Looking toward cyberspace: beyond grounded sociology.

Contemporary Sociology, 28, pp. 643-648.

Webb. N.M. (1982). Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational

Research, 52(3), pp. 421-445.

Webb, N., & Palincsar, A. S. (in press). Group processes in the classroom. In D. Berliner & R.

Valfee (Eds), Handbook of Research in Educational Psychology, pp. 841-873.

Weigel, R. H., Wiser, P. L., & Cook, S. W. (1975). Impact of cooperative learning experiences on cross-ethnic relations and attitudes. Journal of Social Issues, 31(1), pp.

219-245.

Zdenek & Sean. (1999). Rising up from the MUD: inscribing gender in software design.

Discourse & Society, 10(3), pp. 379-409.

王岱伊 (2002). 小組合作策略。國立交通大學資訊科學研究所碩士論文。

梁家玉 (2002). 自我效能對網路合作學習之影響。國立交通大學電機資訊學院學程碩士 論文。

黃惠仙 (2002). 網路學習者互動歷程之研究─以文本溝通為例。國立中正大學教育學研 究所碩士論文。

劉彥君 (2003). 累積接續式網路合作學習設計。國立交通大學資訊科學研究所碩士論 文。