研究限制 - 國小學生網路搜尋合作學習對集體效能與自我效能之影響

本研究設計雖經仔細安排，然而仍存在下列幾項限制：

1.樣本限制

本實驗之樣本僅取苑裡國小五六年級學生，樣本具有地區性。由於數位落差存在城鄉之間，相對的其電腦網路自我效能亦可能存在差異，因此本研究之推論應只限於鄉鎮地區國小高年級學生。

2.分組模式

本實驗為了觀察高、中、低效能學生分別在高、低效能情境之下之效能變化，因此各組型內之組員自我效能差異性不足，如高效能者面對的組員只有一位效能不同，如此情形亦發生在低自我效能者的比較情況。所以若能設計較為明顯差距的效能情境，其差異可能更為明顯。

3.任務性質

本研究以加總性之網路搜尋專題為任務，小組績效以組員個別之表現加總來衡量。由於任務性質對小組合作之模式有決定性之影響，因此如果本研究之任務改為其他模式，如最大表現或是連結性的，則本研究之推論尚須進一步驗證。

4.網際網路對小學生的適用性

本實驗任務為網路搜尋合作，在合作過程中將無可避免的受網際網路中五花八門資料所影響，其中充斥許多遊戲誘惑，偶有發現學生對小組合作不專心，而私下到遊戲網站。且在網際網路上的資料對小學生來說其適用性尚待改進，雖然資料豐富，但組織仍然鬆散不全，或有錯誤之虞，而這些均是本實驗未控制之變因。

參考文獻

王岱伊 (民 91)，小組合作學習策略之研究。國立交通大學資訊科學研究所碩士論文。

計惠卿 (民 92)。解析 PBL 網路活動之合作分享功能。教學科技與媒體，64，85-101。

教育部(民 91)。九年一貫課程。取自. http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/index.php 黃政傑、林佩璇 (民 85) ，合作學習，台北，五南圖書。

陸慧英 (民 92)，利用網上協作改變教育範式。輯於，陳德懷、黃亮華，邁向數位學習社會，台北，遠流。

梁家玉 (民 91)，自我效能對網路合作學習之影響。國立交通大學資訊學程碩士班碩士論文。

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.

Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for workgroup innovation:

development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235-258.

Baker, D. F. (2001). The development of collective efficacy in small task in small groups.

Small Group Research, 32, 4, 451-474.

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 2, 122-147.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory.

Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1988). Reflection on nonability determinants of competence. In R. J. Sternberg

& J. Kolligian, Jr. (Eds.), Competence considered: Perceptions of competence and incompetence across the lifespan: 315-362. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of control. NY: Freeman.

Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75-78.

Bandura, A. (2001). Cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annul. Rev. Psychology. 52, 1-26.

Bandura, A. (2002). Growing primacy of human agency in adaptation and change in the electronic era. European Psychologist, 7, 1, 2-16.

Chen, G., & Bliese, P. D. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 3, 549-556.

Choi, J. N., Price, R. H., & Vinokur, A. D. (2003). Self-efficacy changes in groups: effects of diversity, leadership, and group climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 357-372.

Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.

Compeau, D. R. & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19, 2, 189-211.

Dillienbourg, P., & Schneider, D. (1995). Collaborative learning and the Internet. Retrieved 2003, from http://tecfa.unique.ch/tecfa.html

Dodge, B. (1997). Some Thoughts About WebQuests. Retrieved 2004, from http://edweb.sdsu.edu/courses/edtec596/about_webquests.html.

Earley, P. C. (1993). East meets west meets mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Academy of Magagement Review, 10, 803-813.

Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6, 1.

Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M. & Medsker, G. J. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49, 2, 429-452.

Feltz, D. L., & Lirgg, C. D. (1998). Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 557-564.

Fernández-Ballesteros, R., Díez-Nicolás, J., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A.

(2002). Determinants and structural relation of personal efficacy to collective efficacy.

Applied Psychology, 51, 1, 107-125.

Gibson, C. B., Randel, A. E., & Earley, P. C. (2000) Understanding group efficacy: An empirical test of multiple assessment methods. Group & Organization Management, 25, 1,

67-96.

Gibson, C. B. (2001). From knowledge accumulation to accommodation: Cycles of collective cognition in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 2.

Gibson, C. B. (2003). The efficacy advantage: Factors related to the formation of group efficacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 10, 2153-2186.

Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy : A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 2, 183-211.

González, M. G., Burke, M. J., Santuzzi, A. M., & Bradley, J. C. (2003). The impact of group process variables on the effectiveness of distance collaboration groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 629-648.

Gros, B. (2001). Instructional design for computer-supported collaborative learning in primary and secondary school. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 439-451.

Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 5, 819-832 Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups:

Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87-106.

Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work ( and those don’t). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hackman, J. R. (1992). Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette,

& L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Hodges, L., & Carron, A. V. (1992). Collective efficacy and group performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23, 48-59.

Jex, S. M., & Bliese, P. D. (1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of

work-related stressor: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 3, 49-361.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1990). Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN:

International Book Company.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory. In R. S. Tindale, L. Heath, J. Edwards, E. J. Posavac, F. B. Nryant, Y.

Suarez-Balcazar, E. H. King, & J. Myers. (Eds.) Theory and research on small groups, NY:

Plenum.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone. Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.

Joiner, R., et al. (1999). Comparing human-human and robot-robot interactions. In P.

Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning (pp. 197-218). Amsterdam: Pergamon.

Joo, Y. J., Bong, M. & Choi, H. J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational technology, Research and Development, 48, 2, 5-17.

Jung, D. I., & Sosik, J. J. (2003). Group potency and collective efficacy. Group &

Organization Management, 28, 3, 366-391.

Juvonen, J. & Nishina, A. (1997). Social motivaton in the classroom: Attributional accounts and development analysis. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 10, 181-211.

Lee, C., & Farh, J. L. (2004). Joint effects of group efficacy and gender diversity on group cohesion and performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 1, 136-154.

Lester, S. W., Meglino, B. M., & Korsgaard, M. A. (2002). The antecedents and

consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups.

Academy of Management Journal, 45, 2, 352-368.

Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995). Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20, 645-678.

Linnenbrink, E. A. & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as enabler for academic success.

School Psychology Review, 31, 3, 313-327.

Linnenbrink, E. A. & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 119-137.

Little, B. L. & Madigan, R. M. (1997). The relationship between collective efficacy and performance in manufacturing work teams. Small Group Research, 28, 4, 517-534.

Malone, J. W. (2001). Shining a new light on organizational change: improving self-efficacy through coaching. Organization Development Journal, 19, 2, 27-36.

Margolis, H., & McCabe, P. P. (2003). Self-efficacy: A key to improving the motivation of struggling learners. Preventing School Failure, 47, 4, 162-169.

Martin, J. (2001). Organizational behavior. Retrieved 2004, from

http://www.thomsonlearning.co.uk/businessandmanagement/martin2/ch06.pdf.

Mathieu, J. E., Martineau, J. W., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1993). Individual and situational influences on the development of self-efficacy: Implications for training effectiveness.

Personnel Psychology, 46, 1, 125-147.

Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y. & Johnson, R. D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted

character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9, 2, 126-163.

Mukkonen, H., Hakkarainen, K., & Lakkala, M. (1999). Collaborative technology for facilitating progressive inquiry: Future learning environment tools. Paper presented at the CSCL, Stanford.

Mulvey, P. W. & Klein, H. J. (1998). The impact of perceived loafing and collective efficacy on group goal process and group performance. Organization Behavior and human decision processes, 74, 1, 62-87.

O'Leary-Kelly, A. M. (1998). The influence of group feedback on individual group member response. In G. R. Ferris. (Ed). Research in personnel and human resources management, 16. (pp. 255-294). Stamford, CT, USA: Jai Press.

Orrill, C. H. (2001). Supporting online PBL: Design considerations for collaborative problem-solving communication tools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Seattle.

Ouwerkerk, J. W., & Ellemers, N. (2002). The benefits of being disadvantaged:

performance-related circumstances and consequences of intergroup comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 73-91.

Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), Perception, London: Ablex.

Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 2, 139-158.

Pescosolido, A. T. (2003). Group efficacy and group effectiveness: The effects of group efficacy over time on group performance and development. Small Group Research, 34, 1, 20-42.

Pintrich, P., & DeGroot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 1, 33-40.

Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Prussia, G. E., & Kinicki, A. J. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 2, 187-198.

Riggs, M. L., & Knight, P. A. (1994). The impact of perceived success-failure on

motivational beliefs and attitudes: A causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 5, 755-766.

Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1985). Peer Models: Influence on children’s self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 313-322.

Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2000). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A.

Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation. San Diego:

Academic Press.

Schwartz, D. L. (1999). The productive agency that drives collaborative learning. In P.

Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning (pp. 197-218). Amsterdam: Pergamon.

Slavin, R. E. (1984). Students motivating students to excel: Cooperative incentives, cooperative tasks, and student achievement. Elementary School journal, 85, 1, 53-63.

Slavin, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership.

48, 5, 71-82.

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: theory, research, and practice. Needham Height, Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.

Slavin, R. E. (1996). Cooperative learning in middle and secondary schools. The Clearing House, 69, 4, 200-204.

Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work related performance: A meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240-311.

Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.

Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2004). Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning. Computers & Education, 42, 403-424.

Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching

Uribe, D., Klein, J. D., & Sullivan, H. (2003). The effect of computer-mediated collaborative learning on solving ill-defined problems. Educational Technology, Research and

Development, 51, 1, 5-19.

Wang, S.-L., & Lin, S. S. J. (2000, August). Cross culture validation of Motivational Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Paper presented in the 2000 annual meeting of American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., USA.

Wentzel, K. R. & Wigfield, A. (1998). Academic and motivational influences on students’

academic performance. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 2.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-51.

附錄

一、自我效能問卷

各位同學你好，對於這學期的電腦課請依你的判斷回答，對題目的問題是否和你想法符合，數字越大表示越符合題目。請在格子裡打D。

和我符合的程度＝＝＞

非常不符合１不大符合２有一點符合３部分符合４非常符合５

1 我相信這學期電腦課我會得到優異成績 2 我相信我能理解這學期電腦課的每一個部分 3 我自信我能學會這學期電腦課所教的基本操作 4 我自信我能理解老師教的最複雜的部分

5 我自信能將這學期電腦課的作業做好，考試考好 6 我預期我能在這門課拿高分

7 我相信我能精通這學期電腦課所教的方法技能 8 考量這門課的困難度、老師、和自己的能力，我

覺得我可以學好這門課

二、集體效能問卷

各位同學你好，對於你們小組，請依你的判斷回答，對題目的問題是否和你想法符合，數字越大表示越符合題目。請在格子裡打D。

信心程度＝＝＞

非常不符合１不大符合２有一點符合３符合４非常符合５

1 我相信我們這一組會得到優異成績

2 我相信我們這一組能理解專題的每一個部分 3 我相信我們這一組能學會專題所教的基本操作 4 我相信我們這一組能理解專題的最複雜的部分 5 我相信我們這一組能將專題做好，考試考好 6 我預期我們這一組能在這次專題得高分

7 我相信我們這一組能學會專題所教的方法技能 8 考量這次專題的困難度、老師、和自己的能力，我覺

得我們這一組可以做好這次專題

三、下次任務集體效能問卷

各位同學你好，恭喜你們小組完成這次任務，接著你們小組要進行下一次小組任務，請依你的判斷回答，對題目的問題是否和你想法符合，數字越大表示越符合題目。請在格子裡打D。

信心程度＝＝＞

非常不符合１不大符合２有一點符合３符合４非常符合５

1 我相信我們這一組下一次會得到優異成績

2 我相信我們這一組下一次能理解專題的每一個部分 3 我相信我們這一組下一次能學會專題所教的基本操

作

4 我相信我們這一組下一次能理解專題的最複雜的部分

5 我相信我們這一組下一次能將專題做好，考試考好 6 我預期我們這一組下一次能在這次專題得高分

7 我相信我們這一組下一次能學會專題所教的方法技能

8 考量這次專題的困難度、老師、和自己的能力，我覺得我們這一組下一次可以做好這次專題

四、合作滿意度問卷

各位小朋友：

恭喜您完成這次合作專題，請按照你心中的感覺來回答下列題目，對於合作的過程我覺得： (靠近左邊的答案，還是靠近右邊的答案，請把數字圈起來)

1組員網路知識？不足 1 2 3 4 5 充足 2組員之間互相？不了解 1 2 3 4 5 互相了解 3組員之間想法？沒有創意 1 2 3 4 5 有創意 4合作相處覺得？不愉快 1 2 3 4 5 愉快

5討論的時間？不足 1 2 3 4 5 充足 6組員之間？各做各的 1 2 3 4 5 一起合作 7完成報告？很花時間 1 2 3 4 5 很省時間 8搜尋資料過程？很雜亂 1 2 3 4 5 有順序

9完成的過程？慢又差 1 2 3 4 5 快又好 10對於小組成績？不滿意 1 2 3 4 5 很滿意

11比較團隊合作和單獨做？單獨做

學的多 1 2 3 4 5 團隊合作學的多

五、電腦網路使用經驗問卷

各位同學你好：

你家裡是否有電腦 F有 F沒有(如果沒有電腦以下問題請不用回答)

你家裡的電腦是否可以讓你上網 F可以 F不可以(如果不可以、以下問題請不用回答)

你再家裡一週共可以上網：

F1到2小時 F2到3小時 F3到4小時 F5小時以上

六、學生作品舉例

1.銀河系是什麼？太陽在銀河系的什麼位置？

我們所居住的銀河系，它比普通的星系還要稍微大一些，直

在文檔中國小學生網路搜尋合作學習對集體效能與自我效能之影響 (頁 79-94)