第五章 結論與建議
第三節 研究限制
本研究已在研究架構、研究方法、資料處理與統計分析上力求嚴謹，並且符 合學術規範，但是仍然有研究上的限制，如下所示。
一、研究推論的限制
本研究因空間與人力因素，研究對象採取便利抽樣，而且僅限於臺北地區 B 國中 7 年級參與本課程的學生，故推論具有侷限性，研究結果無法應用至所有年 齡層學生。其次，由於採用自陳式量表回收問卷，非使用精密儀器測量專注程度，
較無法反應受試者真正的情況，因此亦無法得知科學數值與自我陳述之間的誤差
值。第三，本研究非採用縱貫研究進行，雖然所有研究假說獲得驗證，但僅為暫 時性答案，這是因為人的行為與知覺會隨著時空環境而有所改變，因此無法類推 到長期沉浸於擴增實境學習環境的情況之中。
二、系統設計的限制
為配合國中電腦教室的設備與成本考量，因此本擴增實境學習系統是以網站 的形式來呈現，並以電腦螢幕作為擴增實境的顯示方式，未能以其他形式的系統 架構進行開發。而在教材內容方面也聚焦於數位單眼的基礎攝影知識架構，但此 知識架構並未包含所有攝影知識。而在用字遣詞方面，也盡量符合國中學生的理 解程度。另外，基於現實考量，本課程實施時間僅為二堂課(共計 90 分鐘)，因 此亦會造成研究結果的限制。
三、研究變項的限制
雖然本研究已在研究設計上盡力排除其他因素影響研究結果，但仍有相當多 的因素是足以影響學生使用擴增實境進行學習的接受度，如學生的個人因素、學 習教材設計、老師個人特質等，以及學生接觸到新教學媒體所產生「新奇效應」
的內在特質，因此不能完全排除這層面的影響。
參考文獻
一、中文部分
吳明隆(2008)。結構方程模式：SIMPLIS 的應用。臺北市：五南。
卓詠欽、王健華(2008 年 5 月)。擴增實境(Augmented Reality)應用於臺灣教育之 初探研究：以國小自然與生活科技教育為例。「第十二屆全球華人電腦教育 應用大會(GCCCE)」發表之論文，美國密西根州立大學。
林信志、湯凱雯、彭郁雅(2010 年 12 月)。從使用意圖探討擴增實境數位教材之 最佳設計策略。「2010 國際學術研討會(TAECT)」發表之論文，淡江大學。
林勝賢、張承憲、陳宗禧(2010 年 10 月)。探討擴增實境融入行動學習對國小學 生自然與生活科技學習動機與學習成就的影響。「TANET 2010 臺灣網際網 路研討會」發表之論文，國立臺南大學。
邱皓政(2005)。量化研究法(一)：研究設計與資料處理。臺北市：雙葉書廊。
邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北市：五南。
侯正裕、陳靜枝、陳鴻基 (2010)。為何人們使用社交網站？認知專注的觀點。
資訊管理學報，17，97–116。
范丙林、薛威明、蔣丏(2008 年 6 月)。圖卡式擴增實境於電腦輔助教學之設計應 用。「2008 玩具與遊戲設計暨造型設計研討會」發表之論文，國立臺北教育 大學。
張芳全(2008)。問卷就是要這樣編。臺北市：心理。
張珈(2010)。行動數位渾天儀用於國小天文觀測教學(未出版之碩士論文)。國立 臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
張紹勳(2000)。研究方法。臺中市：滄海。
教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要重大議題：資訊教育。取自 http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php
蔡博元、林慧玉、吳邦昌(2011 年 4 月)。閱聽人使用數位閱讀系統之意願探討。
「ITAC 2011 資訊科技應用學術研討會」發表之論文，中國科技大學。
賴崇閔、黃秀美、廖述盛、黃雯雯(2009)。3D 虛擬實境應用於醫學教育接受度 之研究。教育心理學報，40，341-362。
二、英文部分
Abad, M., Díaz, I., & Vigo, M. (2010). Acceptance of mobile technology in hedonic scenarios. Proceedings of the 24th BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference,
Swinton, UK, 250–258.
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694.
Asai, K., Kobayashi, H., & Kondo, T. (2005). Augmented instructions: A fusion of augmented reality and printed learning materials. Proceedings of the fifth IEEE
international Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 213–215. doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2005.71
Azuma (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Teleoperators and Virtual
Environments, 6(4), 355–385.
Azuma, R. T., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001).
Recent advances in Augmented Reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and
Applications, 21(6), 34–47.
Balog, A., & Pribeanu, C. (2010). The role of perceived enjoyment in the students' acceptance of an augmented reality teaching platform: A structural equation modelling approach. Studies in Informatics and Control, 19(3), 319–330.
Berry, R., Makino, M., Hikawa, N., Suzuki, M., & Inoue, N. (2006). Tunes on the table. Multimedia Systems, 11(3), 280–289. doi: 10.1007/s00530-005-0008-7 Billinghurst, M. (2002). Augmented reality in education, New Horizons for Learning.
Retrieved from http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/technolog y/billinghurst.htm
Bimber, O., & Raskar, R. (2005). Modern approaches to augmented reality.
Proceeding of ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Courses, New York, USA, 1–86. doi:
10.1145/1198555.1198711
Bouta, H., Retalis, S., & Paraskeva, F. (2012). Utilising a collaborative macro-script to enhance student engagement: A mixed method study in a 3D virtual
environment. Computers & Education, 58(1), 501–517.
Bruner, G. C., & Kumar, A. (2005). Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices. Journal of Business Research, 58(5), 553–558.
doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.08.002
Carmigniani, J., Furht, B., Anisetti, M., Ceravolo P., Damiani, E., & Ivkovic, M.
(2011). Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimedia
Tools and Applications, 51(1), 341–377. doi: 10.1007/s11042-010-0660-6
Chandra, S., Srivastava, S. C., & Theng, Y. L., (2009). Role of Cognitive Absorption and Trust for Collaboration in Virtual World. Proceeding of Pacific Asia
Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2009), Hyderabad, India, 1–13.
Chandra, S., Theng, Y. L., Lwin, M. O., & Foo, S. (2009). Examining the role of cognitive absorption for information sharing in virtual worlds. Proceeding of the
59th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA 2009), Chicago, USA, 1–33.
Chen, C. M., & Tsai, Y. N. (2012).Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools. Computers & Education, 59(2), 638–
652. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.001
Chen, Y. C. (2006). A study of comparing the use of augmented reality and physical models in chemistry education. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM international
conference on Virtual reality continuum and its applications, Hong Kong, 369–
372. doi: 10.1145/1128923.1128990
Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1990). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with
everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Davis, F. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user
information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology). Retrieved fromhttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15192
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 318–339. doi: 10.2307/249008 Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer
technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science,
35(8), 982
–1003. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in
human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2012). Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education.
Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002
Farkhatdinov, I., & Ryu, J. H. (2009). Development of educational system for
automotive engineering based on augmented reality. Proceedings of the ICEE &
ICEER 2009, Korea, 126–131.
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2009). Flow online: Lessons learned and future prospects. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(1), 23–34. doi:
10.1080/01449290701662169
Irawati, S., Hong, S., Kim, J., & Ko, H. (2008). 3D edutainment environment:
Learning physics through VR/AR experiences.
Proceedings of the 2008
International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, Japan, 2008,
21–24. doi: 10.1145/1501750.1501755Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011). The 2011
Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006).A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740–755.
doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
Lapointe, L., & Rivard, S. (2007). A triple take on information system implementation.
Organization Science, 18(1), 89–107. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0225
Lee, J. O., & Kim, Y. S. (2011). An AR-based Wiring Practice for PLC Training.
Journal of International Council on Electrical Engineering, 1(4), 425–429.
Lee, K. (2012). Augmented Reality in Education and Training. TechTrends, 56 (2), 13–21. doi:10.1007/s11528-012-0559-3
Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. H. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information &
Management, 42(8), 1095–1104.doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.10.007
Leong, P. (2011). Role of social presence and cognitive absorption in online learning environments. Distance Education, 32(1), 5–28. doi:
10.1080/01587919.2011.565495
Liao, C., To, P. L., Liu, C. C., & Kuo, P. Y. (2011). Factors influencing the intended
use of web portals. Online Information Review, 35(2), 237–254. doi:
10.1108/14684521111128023
Lin, H. F. (2009). Examination of cognitive absorption influencing the intention to use a virtual community. Behaviour and Information Technology, 28(5), 421–431.
doi: 0.1080/01449290701662169
Liu, S., Liao, H., & Pratt, J. A. (2009). Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computers & Education, 52(3), 599–607.
doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.002
Magni, M., Taylor, S. M., & Venkatesh, V. (2010). To play or not to play: A cross-temporal investigation using hedonic and instrumental perspectives to explain user intentions to explore a technology. International Journal of
Human-Computer Studies, 68(9), 572–588. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.03.004
Martin, S., Diaz, G., Sancristobal, E., Gil, R., Castro, M., & Peire, J. (2011). New technology trends in education: Seven years of forecasts and convergence.
Computers & Education, 57(3), 1893
–1906. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.003
Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Saorín, J.L., Contero, M., Alcaniz, M., Pe´rez-Lo´pez, D. C., &
Ortega, M. (2010). Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers & Graphics, 34(1), 77–91. doi: 10.1016/j.cag.2009.11.003
Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1994). Augmented Reality: A class of displays on the Reality-Virtuality Continuum. Proceedings of
Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, 282
–292.Moon, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context.
Information & Management, 38(4), 217
–230. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
Motokawa, Y., & Saito, H. (2006). Support system for guitar playing using augmented reality display. Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Society of Japan Annual
Conference, 11th, 243
–244. doi: 10.1109/ISMAR.2006.297825Pan, Z., Cheok, A. D., Yang, H., Zhu, J., & Shi, J. (2006). Virtual reality and mixed reality for virtual learning environments. Computers & Graphics, 30(1), 20–28.
doi:10.1007/11736639_4
Pengcheng, F., Mingquan, Z., & Xuesong, W. (2011). The significance and
effectiveness of augmented reality in experimental education. Proceedings of
2011 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government (ICEE), China,
1–4. doi: 978-1-4244-8694-6/11/$26.0Roca, J. C., Chiu, C. M., & Martinez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model.
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683–696.
doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003
Saade, R., & Bahli, B. (2004). The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42(2), 317–327.
doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.12.013
Serenko, A. (2008). A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification.
Interacting with Computers, 20(4-5), 461
–472.doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.04.004
Shang, R., Chen, Y., & Shen, L. (2005). Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations for consumers to shop on-line. Information and Management, 42(3), 401–413.
Shelton, B. E., & Hedley, N. R. (2002). Using augmented reality for teaching
Earth-Sun relationships to undergraduate geography students. Proceeding of The
First IEEE International Workshop on Augmented Reality Toolkit, 1
–8. doi:10.1109/ART.2002.1106948
Skadberg, Y. X., & Kimmel, J. R. (2004). Visitors’ flow experience while browsing a web site: Its measurement, contributing factors and consequences. Computers in
Human Behavior, 20(3), 403–422. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00050-5
Sumadio, D. D., & Rambli, D. R. A. (2010). Preliminary evaluation on user acceptance of the augmented reality use for education. Proceeding of 2010
Second International Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications, Bali, Indonesia, 461–465. doi: 10.1109/ICCEA.2010.239
Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model.
Management Science, 42(1), 85
–92. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.42.1.85Tan, K. T. W., Lewis, E. M., Avis, N. J., & Withers, P. J. (2008).Using augmented reality to promote an understanding of materials science to school children.
Proceeding of ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2008 educators programme, Singapore,
1–8. doi: 10.1145/1507713.1507716Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering
experiences (‘‘absorption’’), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of
Abnormal Psychology, 83(3), 268–277.
Teng, C. I. (2010). Who are likely to experience flow: Impact of temperament and character on flow. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 863–868. doi:
10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.012
Thomas, P. (2006). Cognitive absorption: Its antecedents and effect on user intentions to use technology. Proceedings of the Twelfth Americas Conference on
Information Systems, Acapulco, Mexico, 1092–1103.
Thompson, N., & McGill, T. J. (2008). Multimedia and cognition: Examining the effect of applying cognitive principles to the design of instructional materials.
Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(2), 143-159.
Tsai, M. K., Lee, Y. C., Lu, C. H., Chen, M. H., Chou, T. Y. (2012). Integrating geographical information and augmented reality techniques for mobile escape guidelines on nuclear accident sites. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 109, 36–44.
Vallino, J. R. (1998). Interactive augmented reality (Doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester, New York), Retrieved from
http://www.google.com.tw/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=Interactive%2Baugmented%2Brea lity&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDwQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.is t.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.83.2329%26rep%3Drep 1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=-Hm6ToGiNInqmAWs6pCUCA&usg=AFQjCNG96Z7b E_8yY0ouLZx0s0M9mHAWng&sig2=iBxer5-FWb09OmW3YEAneA
van der Heijden, H. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: The case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information & Management, 40(6), 541–549 van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS
Quarterly, 28(4), 695–704.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model.
Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.
Wakefield, R., & Whitten, D. (2006). Mobile computing: A user study on hedonic/utilitarian mobile device usage. European Journal of Information
Systems, 15(3), 292–300.
Webster, J., Trevino, L. K., & Ryan, L. (1993). The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 9(4), 411–
426. doi: 10.1016/0747-5632(93)90032-N
Wright, K., & Granger, M. (2001). Using the web as strategic resource: An Applied Classroom Exercise. Proceedings of the International Academy for Information
Management (IAIM) Annual Conference: International Conference on
Informatics Education and Research (ICIER), New Orleans, USA, 69–78.
Wu, X., & Gao, Y. (2011). Applying the extended technology acceptance model to the use of clickers in student learning: Some evidence from macroeconomics classes.
American Journal of Business Education, 4(7), 43–50.
Yan, H., Yun, R., Liang, C., Yu, D., & Zhang, B. (2011). Research on augmented reality display method of scientific exhibits. Transactions on edutainment V,
6530(2011), 259–269. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-18452-9_21
Yi, M. Y. & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predictingthe use of web-based information systems:
self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology
acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 431–449. doi: 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00114-9
Zhang, P., Li, N., & Sun, H. (2006). Affective quality and cognitive absorption:
Extending technology acceptance research. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii
International Conference on System Sciences, USA, 8, 1–10. doi:
0-7695-2507-5/06/$20.00
附錄一 預試問卷
題目中所指稱的擴增實境(AR)是指「AR you ready?學攝影」中的擴增實境效果。每一題 目之後均有五種「同意程度」的選項，依據您個人感受所符合的程度，在適當的□內打
題目 非常同意 同意 普通 不同意 不同意 非常
附錄二 正式問卷
題目 非常 同意 同意 普通 同意 不 不同意 非常
附錄三 研究實施家長同意書
親愛的家長：
您好，我是國立臺灣師範大學圖文傳播學系碩士生吳美慧，擬定於今年四
~五月份在貴子弟的「資訊教育」課程中，進行三個禮拜的新科技介紹示範與 學習 - 「AR You Ready 學攝影」，共計三小時。課程的內容將以新穎有趣的擴 增實境技術，來教導一些基礎入門的攝影知識，讓孩子在電腦課中不僅接觸到 擴增實境技術，還可以學習到攝影的相關知識。因應研究上的需要，在完成後 需要填寫一份問卷，以了解貴子弟對於本課程的感覺以及接受度為何，因此期 望能徵求您的同意，讓貴子弟參與此次的課程活動。後學將會完全依照學術的 嚴謹規範，所有問卷內容完全保密，僅供學術上使用，個人資料絕對不會公開，
請您完全不必擔心。懇請 您惠予同意，並請在本同意書上簽名，謹此感謝。
肅此 敬祝 鈞安
國立臺灣師範大學圖文傳播學系碩士生 後學 吳美慧 敬上
茲同意本人子女 _____________（姓名）參與「AR You Ready 學攝影」課 程，並同意研究者可將課程期間蒐集之問卷資料用於學術研究與公開發表。唯 研究者需將參與學生的個人資料與學校資料妥善匿名處理，並遵行研究倫理來 進行研究，以確保參與者之有關權益。
家長簽名：
日期： 年 月 日
*請直接交回本頁即可。