研究限制與未來發展方向

本研究採用問卷法的方式進行，其限制有二：首先，臉書使用者眾多，組 成也很複雜，本研究單從Ptt 批踢踢實業坊之問卷版收集樣本，可能會有樣本 不夠具代表性的問題，無法反映推論到各年齡層、生活型態的使用者身上，未 來相關研究可以針對特定族群來調查該族群的狀況，或是分別調查各個族群的 狀況來探討是否本研究所發現的現象是否為普同性的現象，以避免僅使用單一 族群推斷其他族群可能發生的誤差狀況。由於本研究其中一個對個體臉書自我

展現的推想為理想我，但在本次樣本結果中並未獲得證實。若考慮到不同年齡 層的發展狀況，可能在國、高中生階段，個體在臉書上不會有太多層的社交關 係，加上同儕間的比較、競爭，凸顯自我比符合社會期待重要時，可能就會發 生本研究假設的臉書性格會比現實活躍的情況，所以不同年齡層的使用習慣會 是未來可以深入探討的目標之一。其次，本研究屬自陳式量表，加上網路匿名 與隔離的特性，並不能直接確認受試者的填答認真程度，僅能從後續的資料中 剔除無法使用的樣本，未來研究或許可以尋找更好的管道或是作答方式來解決 此項問題。

另外，在研究方法上，本研究另有三個問題值得注意：首先，本研究所使 用的臉書幸福感量表，原始量表原有三個構念，然而本研究只抽取出兩個構 念，並且此二構念並不完全對應於原始量表中的三個構念。其中臉書自尊構念 題目與題意並不夠完整，後續研究希望能夠找到更好的臉書幸福感指標，也許 效果會更加明顯。其次，臉書幸福感與現實幸福感非完全獨立之面向，即個體 在臉書上獲得幸福感後，這樣的正面感受有可能連帶提升其現實的幸福感。往 後是否能有更好的區分方式，還需要進一步深入探討。最後，本研究所探討的 性格變項至幸福感之間，仍存有許多其他變數的影響，如臉書上的現實朋友、

社會比較、從眾、年齡、使用習慣等影響，導致個體在臉書上的行為充滿更複 雜的變化，解釋上也需要更詳細的說明，未來研究可以針對特定的性格作更深 入的探討，以了解特定的性格差距至幸福感之間更具體的心理運作機制。

研究者相信臉書態度同質性就是現在引發眾多討論的「同溫層」效果，許 多人開始注意到自身周圍的意識形態的單一性，並且藉由觀察到社會其他不同 聲音而發現自己處在「同溫層」中，只接收到單一價值觀的資訊與想法，無法 客觀的面對社會中的其他人事物，漸漸引起社會各階層、團體之間的對立與衝 突，所以「同溫層」效果其實是目前網路世界中，非常值得深入探討的議題。

而「同溫層」效果可能包括很多議題，例如種族、國家、黨派、男女、年齡、

意識形態等，都可能成為「同溫層」。本研究僅探討了臉書上四種功能中的態

度同質性，它只是「同溫層」效果中的冰山一角，未來研究可以持續對各種

「同溫層」進行探討，了解各種「同溫層」對個體帶來的各種可能影響。

參考文獻

李仁豪（2014）。「BFI 人格量表中文化及相關五大人格特質量表信效度研 究」。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 102-2410-H- 040-009-SSS），未出版。

陸洛（1998）。中國人幸福感之內涵，測量及相關因素探討。「國家科學委員 會研究彙刊: 人文及社會科學」，8，115-137.

陸洛、黃茂丁、高旭繁（2005）。工作與家庭的雙向衝突：前因，後果及調節 變項之探討。「應用心理研究（台灣）」，27，133-166。

曾文志（2007）。大學生對美好生活的常識概念與主觀幸福感之研究。「教育 心理學」，38，417-441。

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York, NY:

Henry Holt and Company.

Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Wainapel, G., & Fox, S. (2002). "On the Internet no one knows I'm an introvert": Extroversion, neuroticism, and Internet

interaction. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5, 125-128.

Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Kaplan, H., & Dorpatcheon, N. (2008). Click to the past:

The impact of extroversion by users of nostalgic websites on the use of Internet social services. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1907-1912.

Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1289-1295.

Amiel, T., & Sargent, S. L. (2004). Individual differences in Internet usage motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 711-726.

Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130-1132.

Behm-Morawitz, E. (2013). Mirrored selves: The influence of self-presence in a virtual world on health, appearance, and well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.023

Bessière, K., Seay, A. F., & Kiesler, S. (2007). The ideal elf: Identity exploration in world of warcraft. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 530-535. doi:

10.1089/cpb.2007.9994

Biocca, F., Levy, M. R., & Lawrence, J. (1997). Communication in the age of virtual reality. Psyccritiques, 42(2), 170.

Block, J. (1961). Ego identity, role variability, and adjustment. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 25(5), 392.

Butt, S., & Phillips, J. G. (2008). Personality and self-reported mobile phone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 346-360.

Courtois, C., Van Looy, J., De Vocht, M., & De Marez, L. (2011). Self-discrepancy and MMORPGs: Testing the moderating effects of avatar identification and pathological gaming in world of warcraft. Paper presented at the International Conference on the Social Aspects of Digital Gaming. Stuttgart, Germany Crowe, N. (2010). 'It's like my life but more, and better!' - Playing with the Cathay

Shark Girls: MMORPGs, young people and fantasy-based social play.

International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 16(2), 201-223.

Donahue, E. M., Robins, R. W., Roberts, B. W., & John, O. P. (1993). The divided self: concurrent and longitudinal effects of psychological adjustment and social roles on self-concept differentiation. Journal of Personality and Social

Psychology, 64, 834.

Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and

scholarship. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230.

Freud, S. (1920). A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Boni and Liveright.

Gangadharbatla, H. (2008). Facebook me: Collective self-esteem, need to belong, and internet self-efficacy as predictors of the iGeneration’s attitudes toward social networking sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8, 5-15.

Guadagno, R. E., Okdie, B. M., & Eno, C. A. (2008). Who blogs? Personality predictors of blogging. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1993-2004.

Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.

Psychological Review, 94, 319-340. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319 Holone, H. (2016). The filter bubble and its effect on online personal health

information. Croatian Medical Journal, 57, 298.

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History,

measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 693-710.

Lawson, K. (2000). Beyond corporeality: The virtual self in postmodern times.

Journal of Psychological Practice, 6(1), 35-43.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509.

McElroy, J. C., Hendrickson, A. R., Townsend, A. M., & DeMarie, S. M. (2007).

Dispositional factors in internet use: Personality versus cognitive style. MIS

Quarterly, 31, 809-820.

Oh, H. J., Ozkaya, E., & LaRose, R. (2014). How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life

satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 69-78.

Ong, E. Y., Ang, R. P., Ho, J. C., Lim, J. C., Goh, D. H., Lee, C. S., & Chua, A. Y.

(2011). Narcissism, extraversion and adolescents’ self-presentation on Facebook. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 180-185.

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. London, UK: Penguin.

Pedersen, D. M. (1997). Psychological functions of privacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 147–156.

Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person-A psychotherapists view of psychotherapy (Vol. 2004 ed.). London, UK: Constable.

Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R.

(2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 578-586.

Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Rawsthorne, L. J., & Ilardi, B. (1997). Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the Big-Five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1380.

Suh, A. (2013). The influence of self-discrepancy between the virtual and real selves in virtual communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 246-256. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.001

Suler, J. R. (2000). Psychotherapy in cyberspace: A 5-dimensional model of online and computer-mediated psychotherapy. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3,

151-159.

Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., & Ducheneaut, N. (2009). The Proteus effect: Implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior.

Communication Research, 36, 285-312. doi: 10.1177/0093650208330254

附錄

非

非

請選出最符合您在臉書上使用狀況的選項

17. 我與臉書上的朋友們大部分都在現

請選出最符合您目前使用臉書的狀況的選項