• 沒有找到結果。

第六章 結 論

一、 葛根素對學習記憶過程之影響:葛根素對學習獲得障礙誘發劑之作 用,對於乙醯膽鹼毒蕈鹼接受器拮抗劑 scopolamine 無改善作用,但 對乙醯膽鹼尼古丁接受器拮抗劑 mecamylamine、sertonin 釋放促進劑 p-chloroamphetamine 及非 NMDA 接受器拮抗劑 MK-801 等具明顯改善 作用。

二、 葛根素對改善 CXM 誘發記憶鞏固障礙之作用機轉:此改善作用均可被

毒蕈鹼接受器拮抗劑 SCOP、尼古丁接受器拮抗劑 MECA 及 serotonin 釋放促進劑 PCA 拮抗;進一步,其改善作用亦可被突觸後 5-HT2接受器 致效劑 DOI、非選擇性突觸後α接受器拮抗劑 phenoxybenzamine 及非 選擇性突觸後

β

接受器拮抗劑 propanolol 拮抗,但無法被 5-HT1A接受 器致效劑 8-OH-DPAT 所拮抗。

三、 葛根素改善學習記憶障礙作用與中樞神經系統及突觸前或突觸後接受 器之關係:葛根素經腦室給藥後,在 5,7-DHT 破壞 dorsal raphe 後,

對 CXM 誘發大鼠記憶鞏固之障礙仍具改善作用,但在 6-OHDA 破壞 locus coeruleus 後,只在 10

µ

g 劑量下具改善作用(p<0.01),但仍 比假手術組的改善作用明顯下降。另外,葛根素經腦室給藥後,於側 腦室給與 cholinergic neurotoxin AF64A 誘發大鼠學習記憶障礙亦 具拮抗作用。

綜合上述結果,顯示葛根素可增強記憶形成過程中的學習獲得及記憶獲 得,其作用機轉可能直接作用於中樞 cholinergic system 或間接經由中樞 noradrenergic system、serotonergic system 及 exitatory amino acid system 之調節而影響中樞 cholinergic system 改變 Ach 之活性所致;亦 與蛋白質之合成有關。

參考文獻

1. 孫馮翼、孫星衍:神農本草經,卷(二),葛根。五洲出版社,北臺灣 1985;

pp7。

2. 中國醫學科學院藥物研究所:中草藥現代研究(一),葛根。北京醫科大 學暨中國協和醫科大學聯合出版社,北京 1995;12:pp285-90。

3. 郭建全、孫其榮、周全:葛根藥理作用研究進展。中草藥 1995;26(3):

163-65。

4. 辛洪波:葛根對氧自由基的消除作用。中國病理生理雜誌 1991;7(2):

199。

5. Fan LL, Sun LH, Li J, Yue XH, Wang SY, Dong SQ. Protective effect of puerarin against mycordial reperfusion injury: Mycoardial metabolism and ultrastructure. Chinese Medical J 1992; 105(6):451-56.

6. Fan LL, Sun LH, Li J, Yue XH, Wang SY. Protective effect of puerarin against myocardial reperfusion injury:Study on cardiac function. Chinese Medical J 1992; 105(1): 11-7.

7. 陳連壁、柴強、趙愛平、柴象樞:葛根素對犬腦血流量的影響。中國中 藥雜誌 1995;20(9):560-2。

8. 王磊一、趙愛平、王福文、柴強、柴象樞:葛根素對大鼠急性腦缺血的保 護作用。中國中藥雜誌 1997;22(12):752-4。

9. Rosenzweig MR, Bennett EL. Basic processes and modulatory influences in the stages of memory formation. IN: Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

Lynch G, McGaugh JL, Weinberger, NM (eds.) 1984; 263-88.

10. Changeux JP. A critical view of neuroal model of learning and memory. In: Memory Concepts. Andersen P, Hvalby, Paulsen O, Hokfelt B (eds.). Elsevier Science Publisher BV, Netherlands 1993; 413-33.

11. Jodar L, Kaneto H. Synaptic plasticity: Stairway to memory. Jpn J Pharmacol 1995; 68: 359-87.

12. Olton DS, Meck WH, Church RM. Separation of hippocampal and agmydaloid involvement in temporal memory dysfunctions. Brain Res 1987;

404: 180-8.

13. Decker MW, McGaugh JL. The role of interactions between the cholinergic and other neuero modulatory systems in learning and memory. Synapse 1991;

7:151-68.

14. 那琦、謝文全:重輯名醫別錄。中國藥學研究所,台中 1977;71-2。

15. 謝文全等:神農本草經( 古今功能輯注本)。中國藥學研究所,台中 1995;7。

16. 森立之:本草經集注。南大阪印刷株式會社,日本 1972;64。

17. 岡西為人:重輯新修本草。國立中國醫藥研究所,台北 1964;200-1。

18. 宋、唐慎微,艾晟:經史證類大觀本草。正言出版社,台北 1977;224-5。

19. 謝文全等:重輯開寶重定本草。中國藥學研究所,台中 1998;106。

20. 那琦等:重輯嘉祐補注神農本草。中國藥學研究所,台中 1989;83。

21. 明、李時珍:圖解本草綱目。文光圖書公司,台北 1970;740-2。

22. 清、吳其濬:植物名實圖考長編。世界書局,台北 1962;568-71。

23. 清、吳其濬:植物名實圖考。世界書局,台北 1974;540-3。

24. 中國醫學科學院藥物研究所:中草藥現代研究(一),葛根。醫科大學暨 中國協和醫科大學聯合出版社,北京 1995;(12):pp258-84。

25. 樓之岑、秦波主編:常用中藥材品種整理和質量研究,9.葛根類的研究。

醫科大學暨中國協和醫科大學聯合出版社,北京 1995;pp380-419。

26. 石昌順:中藥葛根的研究進展。中草藥 1994;25(9),496。

27. 王磊一、趙愛平、王福文、柴強、柴象樞:葛根素延緩易中風型高血壓 大鼠缺血性痙欒的發作和死亡。中國中藥雜誌 1997;23(7):431。

28. 那琦等:臺灣產藥材之生藥學研究(10),臺灣產葛根之生藥學研究。私 立中國醫藥學院研究年報 1982;251-99。

29. 宋紅普、貫釗:葛根的藥學研究及其臨床應用概況。上海中醫藥雜誌 1999;4:47-9。

30. 康秀汝、張普云、王榮:葛根素降低眼內壓的研究。中華眼科雜誌 1993;

296:336-9。

31. Graham RB. Memory.In: Graham RB (ed), Physiological Pschology, A Division of Waddsworth Inc, California, 1990; 611-48.

32. Izquierdo I. Enogenous state dependency: Memorydepends on the relation between the neurohumoral and hormonal ststes pressent after taining and at the time of testing. In: Lynch G, McGaugh JL, Weinberger NM (eds.),

Neurobiology of learning and memory, The Guilford Press, New York, 1984;

333-50.

33. Rosenzweig M.R. and Bennet E.L. Basic process and modulatory influences in the stages of memory formation, In: Lynch G, McGaugh JL, Weinberger NM (eds.), Neurobiology of learning and memory, The Guilford Press, New York, 1984; 263-88.

34. 韓太真、吳馥梅主編:學習與記憶的神經生物學。北京醫科大學暨中國 協和醫科大學聯合出版社,北京 1998;1(1):pp2-10。

35. Deutsh JA: The cholinergic synapse and the side of mechanism.Science 1971;

174: 788-94.

36. Drachman DA and Leavitt J. Human memory and the cholinergic system: A relationship to aging? Arch Neuro 1974; 30: 113-21.

37. Suits E, Isaacson RL. The effects of scopolamine hydrobromide on one-way and two-way avoidance learning in rats.Int J Neurophrmacol 1968; 7:441-6.

38. Stevens R. Scopolamine impairs spatial maze performace in rats. Physiol Behav 1981; 27:385-6.

39. Van HA, Sroet J, Harren F, Feenstra M. Scopolamine differentially disrupts the behavior of male and female wistar rats in a delayed nomatching to position procedure. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1990; 35:903-9.

40. Paylor R, Rudy JW. Cholinergic receptor blockde can impair the rat’s performance on both the place learning and cued versions of the Morris water task:The role of age and pool wall brightness. Behav Brain Res 1990;

36: 79-90.

41. Evan S, Robert L. The effects of scopolamine hydrobromide on one-way and two-way avoidance learning in rats. Int J Neuropharmacol 1968; 7:

441-6.

42. Rush DK. Scopolamine amnesia of passive avoidance: a deficit of information acquisition. Behav Neural Biol 1988; 50: 255-74.

43. Glick SD, Greenstein S. Differential effects of scopolamine and

mecamylamine on passive avoidance behavior. Life Sci 1972; 11: 169-79.

44. Paul BS Clark, Hans C. Fibiger. Reinforced alternation performance is impair by muscarinic but not by nicotinic receptor blockade in rats. Behav Brain Res 1990; 36: 203-7.

45. Beninger RJ, Wirsching BA, Jhamandas RJ. Effects of altered cholinergic function on Working and reference memory in the rat. Physiol Pharmacol 1985; 64: 376-82.

46. Dunnett SB. Neural transplantation in animal model of dementia.

Eur J Neurosci 1990; 2: 567-87.

47. Goto T, Kuzuya F, Endo H, Tajima T., Ikari H. Some effects of CNS cholinergic neurons on memory. J Neural Transm 1990; 30: 1-11.

48. Oei TPS. Catecholamines and aversive learning: a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1980; 4: 161-73.

49. Collier TJ, Gash DM, Sladek JR. Transplantation of norepinephrine neurons into aged rats improves performance of a learned task. Brain Res 1998;

448(1): 77-87.

50. Sara SJ, Dyon-Laurent C, Herve A. Novelty seeking behavior in the rat is dependent upon the integrity of the noradrenergic system. Brain Res, Cognitive Brain Res 1995; 2(3): 181-7.

51. Pisa M, Fibiger HC. Evidence against a role of the rat’s dorsal noradrenergic bundle in selective attention and place memory. Brain Res 1983; 272: 319-29.

52. Mair RG, Anderson CD, Langlas PJ, McEntee. Thiamine deficiency deplete cortical norepinephrine and impairs learning processes in the rat. Brain Research 1985; 360: 273-84.

53. Sternberg DB, Isaacs KR, Gold PE, McGaugh JL. Epinephrine facilitation of appetitive learning: attenuation with adrenergic receptor antagonists. Behav

& Neural Biol 1985; 44(3): 447-53.

54. Ohno M, Kobayashi M, Kishi A, Watanabe S. Working memory failure by

combined blockade of muscarinic and beta-adrenergic transmission in the rat hippocampus. Neuroreport 1997; 8(7): 1571-75.

55. Nicoll RA, Malenka RC, Kauer JA. Functional comparison of neurotransmitter receptor subtypes in mammalian central neurons system.

Physiol Rev 1990; 70(2): 513-65.

56. Chiu TH, Yang YR, Yang JJ, Chen CL. Inhibition of locus coeruleus neurons by serotonin at high doses. Chinese Journal of Physiology 1995;

38(3): 153-57.

57. Kandel ER. Biological memory models: the switch from short- to long-term facilitation at the connections between sensory and motor neurons of the gillwithdrawal reflex in Aplysia. In: Anderson P, Hvalby O, Hokfelt (Eds.), Memory concepts: Basic and clinical aspects, Elsevier Science Publishers 1993; 93-8.

58. Meneses A, Hong E. Role of 5-HT1B, 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors in learning. Behav Brain Res 1997; 87: 105-10.

59. Santucci AC, Knott PJ, Haroutunian V. Excessive serotonin release, not deoletion, leads to memory impairments in rats. European Journal of Pharmacology 1996; 295(1): 7-17.

60. Ogren SO. Evidence for a role of brain serotonergic neurotransmission in aviodance learning. Acta Physiol Scand 1985; 544: 1-71.

61. Petkov VD, Belcheva S, Konstantinova E, Kehayov R. Participation of different 5-HT receptors in the memory process in rats and its modulation by the serotonin depletor p-chlorophenylamine. Acta Neurobiol Exp 1995; 55(4):

243-52.

62. Ohno M, Yamamoto T, Watanabe S. Working memory deficits induced by interahippocampal administration of 8-OH-DPAT, a 5-HT1A receptor agonist, in the rat. Eropean Journal of Pharmacology 1993; 243: 29-34.

63. Ruotsalainen S, MacDonald E, Kovisto E, Stefanski R. 5-HT1A receptor

agonist (8-OH-DPAT) and 5-HT2 receptor agonist (DOI) disrup the non-cognitive performance of rats in a working memory task. Journal of Psychopharmacology 1998; 12(2): 177-85.

64. Flood JF, Baker ML, Davis JL. Modulation of memory processing by glutamic acid receptor agonists and antagonists. Brain Res 1990; 521:

197-202.

65. Francis PT, Palmer AM, Snape M, Wilcock GK. The cholinergic hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: a review of progress. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 1999; 66(2): 137-47.

66. Ahlandeeer M, Misane I, Schott PA. Abehavioral analysis of the spatial learning deficit induced by the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (Dizocilpine) in the rat. Neuropsychopharmacology 1999; 21: 414-26.

67. Rison RA, Stanton PK. Long-term potentiation and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors: Foundation of memory and neurologic disease? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1995; 19(4): 533-52.

68. Gibbs ME, Ng KT. Diphenylhydantoin facilitation of labile, protein-independent memory. Brain Res Bulletin 1976; 1(2): 203-8.

69. Davis HP, Squire LR. Protein synthesis and memory. Psychol Bull 1984; 96:

518-59.

70. Nabeshima T, Itoh K, Kawashima K, Kameyama T. Effects of 5-HT2

receptor antagonist on cycloheximide-induced amnesia in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1989; 32: 787-90.

71. Schweri MM, Carr LA. The effects of cycloheximide and anisomycin on monamine synthesis in a brain synaptosome preparation. J Neural Transm 1982; 54: 41-50.

72. Nabeshima T, Noda Y, Itoh K, Kameyama T. Role of cholinergic and GABAergic neuronal system in cycloheximide-induced amnesia in mice.

Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1988; 31:405-9.

73. Martin R Farlow. Etiology and pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Heal-Syst Pharm 1998; 55(1): S5-10.

74. Larson EB, KuKull WA, Katzman RL. Cognitive impairment: dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Annual Review of Public Health 1992; 13: 431-49.

75. Fratiglioni L. Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s and current possibilities for prevention. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 1996; 165: 33-40.

76. Gottfries CG. Alzheimer’s disease and senile dementia: biochemical characteristics and aspects of treatment . Psyschopharmacology 1985; 86:

245-52.

77. Price DL. New perspectives on Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Rev Neuroosci 1986; 9: 489-512.

78. Smith G. Animal models of Alzheimer’s disease: experimental cholinergic denervation. Brain Res 1988; 13: 103-18.

79. Tomlison BE, Irving D, Blessed G. Cell loss in the locus coeruleuus in senile dementia of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Sci 1981; 49: 419-28.

80. Mcentee WJ, Crook TH. Age-associated memory impairment: arole for catecholamines. Neurology 1990; 40: 526-30.

81. Cross AJ, Crow TJ, Ferrier IN, Johnson JA, Bloom SR, Corsellis JAN.

Serotonin receptor changes in dementia of the Alzheimer type. J Neurochem 1984; 43: 1574-81.

82. Palmer AM, Francis PT, Benton JS, Sims NR, Mann DMA, Neary D, Snowden JS, Bowen DM. Presynaptic serotonergic dysfunction in patient with Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem 1987; 48: 8-15.

83. Tejani-Butt SM, Yang J, Pawlyk AC. Altered serotonin transporter sites in Alzheimer’s disease raphe and hippocampus. Neuroreport 1995; 6(8):

1207-10.

84. Mattson MP. Author’s response to commentaries. Neurobiology of Aging 1995; 16: 461-3.

85. Ohno M, Yamamoto T, Watanabe S. Amygdaloid NMDA and muscarinic receptors involved in working memory performance of rats. Physiology &

Behavior 1993; 54(5): 993-7.

86. Olney JW. NMDA receptor hypofunction, excitotoxicity, and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of Aging 1995; 16(3): 459-61.

87. JodarL, Kaneto H. Synaptic plasticity: stairway to memory. Jph J Pharmacol 1995; 68: 359-87.

88. Blokland A. Acetylcholine: A neurontranamitter for learning and memory?

Brain Res REV 1996; 21: 285-300.

89. Essman WB. Serotonin in learning and memory. In: Essma WB(Ed.), Clinical Pharmacology of Learning and Memory, Spectrum Public Inc., New York 1983; 43-67.

90. Ogren SO. Central serotonin neurons in avoidance learning: Interaction with noradrenaline and dopamine neurons. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1985, 23:

107-23.

91. Ogren SE. Serotonin receptor involvement in the avoidance learning deficit caused by p-chloroamphetamine-induced serotonin release. Acta Physiol Scand 1986; 126: 449-62.

92. Robinson SE. Effect of specific serotonergic lesions on cholinergic neurons in te hippocampus、cortex and striatum. Life Sci 1983: 32: 345-53.

93. Maura G, Fedele E, Raiteri M. Acetylcholine release from the hippocampal slices is modulated by 5-hydroxytrptamine. Eur J Pharmacol 1989; 165:

173-79.

94. Matsuno K, Senda T, Matsunaga K, Mita S, Kaneto H. Similar ameliiiorating effects of benzomorphans and 5-HT2 antagonists on durg-induced impairment of passive aviodance response in mice: comparison with acetylcholinersterase inhibitors. Psychopharmacology 1993; 32: 787-90.

95. Cheng CHK, Costall B, Kelly ME, Naylor RJ. Actions of

5-hydeoxytryptophan to inhibit annnd disinhibit mousse behaviour in the light/dark test. Eur J Pharmacol 1994; 255: 39-49.

96. Mitoma H, Konishi S. Monoaminergic long-term faciltation of GaBa-mediated inhibitory transmission at cerebellar synapses. Neuroscience 1999; 88(3): 871-83.

97. Moran PM, LeMaitre MH, Philouze V, Reymann Jm, Allain H, Leonard BE:

Reversal of learning and memory impairments following lesion of the nucleus basalis magnnocellularis (NBM) by concurrent noradrenergic depletion using DSP4 in the rat. Brain Research 1992; 595(2): 327-33.

98. Pan SY. Influence of intraventricular injection of 6-hydroxydopamine on passive-avoidance response, acetylcholine, and muscarinic receptors in mouse brain. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 1991; 12: 344-7.

99. Narang N, Wamsley JK. Time dependent changes in DA uptake sites, D1 and D2 receptor binding and mRNA after 6-OHDA lesions of the medial forebrain bundle in the rat brain. J Chem Neuroana 1995; 9: 41-53.

100. Ricaurte GA, Markowska AL, Wenk GL, Hatzidimitriou G, Wlos J, Olton DS. 3,4-methylenedioxymethampheetamine, serotonin and memorrry. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1993; 266: 1097-105.

101. Patel TD, Azmitia EC. Zhou FC. Increased 5-HT1A receptor immunoresctivity in the rat hippocampus following 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine lesions in the cingulum bundle and fimbria-fornix. Behav Brain Res 1996; 73:

319-23.

相關文件