參考文獻

(3) 輕視而貶抑對方（例如後者：對你這種人我非常看不起、你讓我看輕你）

(4) 要求對方做汙穢的動作，藉以辱罵對方（例如後者：你去吃米田共《即糞便》吧！）

5 民法規定拾獲他人財物可要求原價 30% 的酬謝，此可解釋為社會透過法令來「鼓勵」大眾實踐「拾金不昧（即『廉』）之文化價值觀，避免完全受到貪婪人性之影響。此外，法令雖未明文規範教師的言行舉止，但多數教師謹守「經師、人師」的普遍看法與期待，

因此社會未立法可顯示對教職及傳統觀念的「尊重」；至於部份教師的穿著打扮較新潮，可能藉以吸引學生注意力與學習動力，而此顯示教師正因應社會諸多改變與挑戰。

6 相關評論可參見 Smelser（1998）、Wallace 和 Wolf（1998: 178-179）。

文崇一（1989）。《中國人的價值觀》。臺北：東大。

方念萱、蘇彥豪（1998）。〈網路傳播中的對話與對峙--以女性主義連線版的言說為例〉，《新聞學研究》，56: 183-218。

朱建民、葉保強、李瑞全（2005）。《應用倫理與現代社會》。臺北縣蘆洲：國立空中大學。

李玫蓉（2004）。《國中生趨向表現目標、文化價值觀與適應性學習組型之關係》，成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。

胡敏琪（2002）。《網路建構「平民公共領域」的可能性探討——以璩

美鳳光碟事件為例》，世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。

陳宗韓、陳振盛、劉振仁、鄭錦宏（2006）。《倫理學的理論與應用》。臺北縣中和：新文京開發。

莊敬民（2005）。《文化價值觀與社會資訊化對於財富與生活滿意度的影響》，中央大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。

黃俊傑、吳光明（1993）。〈古代中國人的價值觀：價值取向的衝突及其消解〉，沈清松（編），《中國人的價值觀—―人文學觀點》，頁1-33。臺北：桂冠。

黃瑞祺（1996）。《批判社會學——批判理論與現代社會學》。臺北：

三民。

黃慧英（1988）。《後設倫理學之基本問題》。臺北：東大。

黃學碩（1997）。《網際網路公共傳播內容分析：以交大 BBS 站為例》，交通大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。

楊中芳（1993）。〈中國人真是「集體主義」的嗎？試論中國文化的價值體系中國人真是「集體主義」的嗎？試論中國文化的價值體系〉，楊國樞（編），《中國人的價值觀—― 社會科學觀點》，頁321-434。臺北：桂冠。

楊國樞（1993）。〈傳統價值觀與現代價值觀能否同時並存？〉，楊國樞（編），《中國人的價值觀—―社會科學觀點》，頁 65-119。臺北：桂冠。

翟本瑞（2002）。〈網際網路能否成為公共領域？〉，《網路社會學通訊期刊》，26。上網日期：2007 年 11 月 1 日，取自 http://www.

nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/26/social/26-19.htm 鄔昆如（1993）。《倫理學》。臺北：五南。

潘美岑（2004）。《網際網路溝通的語言遊戲》，政治大學廣播電視研

究所碩士論文。

劉潔玲（2002）。〈從中國傳統文化思想及價值觀論目標取向理論在華人社會的運用〉，《教育研究資訊》，10(3): 183-203。

盧諭緯（1999）。《當我們同在一起！BBS 社交性討論區之言說分析》，中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。

藍采風（2000）。《社會學》。臺北：五南。

Burnett, G., & Bonnici, L. (2003). Beyond the FAQ: Explicit and implicit norms in Usenet newsgroups. Library and Information Science Research, 25, 333-351.

Chang, Chia-ling. (2005). Application of politeness theory to tag questions translated from English to Chinese. Master Thesis of Graduate Institute of English Language, Literature and Linguistics, Providence University, R.O.C.

Colomb, G. C., & Simutis, J. A. (1996). Visible conversation and academic inquiry: CMC in a culturally diverse classroom. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 203-222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cutler, R. H. (1996). Technologies, relations, and self. In L. Strate, R.

Jacobson & S. B. Gibson (Eds.), Communication and cyberspace:

Social interaction in an electronic environment (pp. 317-333).

Cresskill, N.J.: Hampton Press.

Davis, B. H., & Brewer, J. P. (1997). Electronic discourse: Linguistic individuals in virtual space. Albany, NY.: State University of New York Press.

Denzin, N. K. (1999). Cybertalk and the method of instances. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net (pp. 107-126). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.

Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Boston:

Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere.

Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Hall, S. (1986). On postmodernism and articulation. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10(2), 45-60.

Hanna, B. E., & De Nooy, J. (2004). Negotiating cross-cultural difference in electronic discussion. Multilingua, 23(3), 257-281.

Herring, S., Johnson, D., & DiBenedetto, T. (1995). This discussion is going too far! Male resistance to female participation on the Internet. In M.

Bucholtz & K. Hall (Eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 67-96). New York: Routledge.

Hoijer, H. (1948). Linguistic and cultural change. Language, 24, 335-345.

Hsu, Yu-shuang (2000). A sociolinguistic study on the cultural values reflected in Chinese men’s and women’s given names in Taiwan.

Master Thesis of Graduate Institute of Linguistics, Fu Jen Catholic University, R.O.C.

Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and technology: From the telephone to the Internet. London: Polity Press.

Jordan, T. (2001). Language and libertarianism: The politics of cyberculture and the culture of cyberpolitics. Sociological Review, 49(1), 1-17.

Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Kramarae, C., & Taylor, H. (1993). Women and men on electronic networks:

A conversation or a monlogue? In H. Taylor, C. Kramarae, & D.

Ebben (Eds.), Women, information technology and scholarship (pp.

52-61). Urbana, IL: Center for Advanced Study.

Lee, Jin Gu (2004). Korean Protestantism as viewed by netizens: A focus on recent activities of anti-Christian sites. Korea Journal, 44(4): 223-245.

Liao, Kung-feng (1991). A survey of child naming and value change in Taiwan. Master Thesis of Graduate Institute of Linguistics, Fu Jen Catholic University, R.O.C.

Light, A., & Rogers, Y. (1999). Conversation as publishing: The role of news forums on the web. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved September 01, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/

vol4/issue4/light.html

Porter, M. E. (2000). Attitudes, values, beliefs and the microeconomics of prosperity. In L. E. Harrison & S. P. Huntington (Eds.), Culture matters. New York: Basic Books.

Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.

Rescher, N. (1969). Introduction to value theory. London: Prentice-Hall.

Richardson, K. (2005). Internet discourse and health debates: A linguistic approach to health risk debates. Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: The Free Press.

Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, MA., USA: Blackwell.

Smelser, N. J. (1998). Presidential address: The rational and the ambivalent in the social sciences. American Sociological Review, 63(1), 1-15.

Smith, M. B. (1969). Social psychology and human values. Chicago: Aldine.

Smith, C. B., McLaughlin, M. L., & Osborne, K. K. (1997). Conduct control on Usenet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4).

Retrieved September 01, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol2/

issue4/smith.html

Sterne, J. (1999). Thinking the Internet: Cultural studies versus the millennium. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net (pp. 257-288). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.

Storey, J. (2001). Cultural theory and popular culture: An introduction (3rd ed.). Harlow, England; New York: Prentice Hall.

Ulijn, J. M., & Kumar, R. (1999). Technical communication in a multicultural world: How to make it an asset in managing international business. In P. J. Hager & H. J. Schriber (Eds.), Managing global discourse: Essays on international scientific and technical communication (pp. 319-348). New York: Wiley.

Wallace, P. (1999). The psychology of the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wallace, R. A., & Wolf, A. (1998). Contemporary sociological theory:

Expanding the classical tradition (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:

Prentice Hall.

Wooffitt, R. (2001). Researching psychic practitioners: Conversation analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor & S. J.Yates (Eds.). Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 49-92). London: Sage.

在文檔中新聞事件之網路議論—關於文化價值觀之闡述 (頁 32-38)