教師職場靈性量表之發展

教 師 職 場 靈 性 量 表 之 發 展

吳和堂

摘要

本研究旨在發展教師職場靈性量表，首先依據文獻提出初稿，分為工作 意義感、社群感及組織認同感三個層面共17題；其次，聘請4位專家進行審 閱，審閱結果共修改6題，維持原題目者有11題；第三，進行預試，採探索性 因素分析，經項目分析、因素與信度分析等三步驟，其中於第一因素分析中 刪1題，剩下的16題進行第二次因素分析，結果發現變異解釋量上，總變異 解釋量為75.00%，總信度為 .95；第四，就探索性因素分析所得的16題進行 驗證性因素分析。本研究結果發現初始模式整體適切性可接受，基本適切度 （項目品質檢驗）良好，三個潛在變項的組合信度與平均變異萃取量也都符 合標準。此外，三個潛在變項具有構念區辨力，也與效標具有顯著的正向關 聯。綜言之，本研究發展的16題三層面職場靈性量表具有信、效度，可供以 進行相關研究。 關鍵詞：工作意義感、社群感、組織認同感、職場靈性 健康促進與衛生教育學報 第 46 期，頁 1-37，2016 年 12 月

Journal of Health Promotion and Health Education No. 46, pp. 1-37, December 2016 國立高雄師範大學教育學系教授，_{E-mail: t1665@nknucc.nknu.edu.tw} 通訊地址：高雄市苓雅區和平一路_{116號，聯絡電話：07-7172930轉2191} 投稿日期：_{104年12月16日；修改日期：105年2月20日；接受日期：105年2月22日} DOI: 10.3966/207010632016120046001 04-1-吳和堂_p001-038.indd 1 2017/2/10 下午 04:28:13

吳和堂　教師職場靈性量表之發展

₂₉

參 考 文 獻

一、中文部分

杜強國、林芳生（2009）。靈性健康與職場靈性之探索性研究—以C公司為 例。全球商業經營管理學報，1，35-50。 林鉦棽、蕭淑月、何慧清（2005）。社會交換理論觀點下組織支持、組織知識分 享行為與組織公民行為相關因素之研究—以信任與關係為分析切入點。人 力資源管理學報，5（1），77-110。 邱皓政（2010）。量化研究與統計分析—SPSS（PASW）資料分析範例（五 版）。臺北市：五南。 凃金堂（2012）。SPSS與量化研究。臺北市：五南。 張火燦、劉嘉雯、黃名楊（2010）。職場靈性影響工作家庭平衡之研究：整合模 式的驗證。臺灣管理學刊，10（l），79-102。 郭生玉（2004）。教育測驗與評量。臺北市：精華書局。 黃芳銘（2010）。結構方程式—理論與應用（五版）。臺北市：五南。 黃國隆、陳惠芳（1998）。資訊技術、組織價值觀與組織承諾之關係。管理學 報，15（3），343-366。 黃毅志（2003）。「臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構與評估：社會 科學與教育社會學研究本土化。師大教育研究集刊，49（4），1-31。 鄭伯壎（1993）。組織價值觀與組織承諾、組織公民行為、工作績效的關係！不 同加權模式與差距模式之比較。中華心理學刊，35（1），43-58。 賴志超、鄭伯壎、陳欽雨（2001）。臺灣企業員工組織認同的來源與其效益。人 力資源管理學報，1（1），27-51。

二、英文部分

Abdullah, A. G. K., & Ismail, A. (2013). Validating and standardization the Scale of Malay Version Workplace Spirituality from Malaysian school settings.

30

健康促進

與

衛生教育

學報　第 46 期

International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(6), 1418-1430.

Aktouf, O. (1992). Management and theories of organizations in the 1990s: Toward a critical radical humanism? Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 407-431. Altaf, A., & Awan, M. A. (2011). Moderating affect of workplace spirituality on the

relationship of job overload and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics,

104(1), 93-99.

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.

Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. A. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization.

Academy of Management Review, 14(2), 20-39.

Ashmos, D., & Duchon, D. P. (2000). Spirituality at work: A conceptualization and measure. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(2), 134-145.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models.

Journal of the Academic of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.

Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1993). EQS/Windows user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software.

Beyer, J. M. (1999, August). Culture, meaning and belonging at work. Paper presented at the 1999 Chicago Academy of Management Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Bishop, P. D., Chertok, F., & Jason, L. A. (1997). Measuring sense of community: Beyond local boundaries. Journal of Primary Prevention, 18(2), 193-212.

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.

Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral

Research, 1(2), 245-276.

Cohn, M. M., & Kottkamp, R. B. (1993). Teachers, the missing voice in education. Albany, NY: Suny.

Conger, J. A. (1994). Spirit at work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

吳和堂　教師職場靈性量表之發展

₃₁

Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and

organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars.

Academy of Management Review, 21, 619-654.

Doolittle, R. J., & MacDonald, D. (1978). Communication and a sense of community in a metropolitan neighborhood: A factor analytic examination. Communication

Quarterly, 26(3), 2-7.

Duchon, D. T., & Plowman, A. (2005). Nurturing the spirit at work: Impact on work unit performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 807-833.

Eby, L. T., Freeman, D. M., Rush, M. C., & Lance, C. E. (1999). Motivational bases of affective organizational commitment: A partial test of an integrative theoretical model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 463-483. Edwards, M. R., & Peccei, R. (2007). Organizational identification: Development

and testing of a conceptually grounded measure. European Journal of Work and

Organizational Psychology, 16(1), 25-57.

Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.

Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological

methods, 4(3), 272-299.

Farr, J. L., & Ford, C. M. (1990). Individual innovation. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational

strategies (pp. 63-80). Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Finegan, J. E. (2000). The impact of person and organizational values on organizational commitment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(2), 149-169.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research,

18, 39-50.

32

健康促進

與

衛生教育

學報　第 46 期

Frankl, V. E. (1963). Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy. New York, NY: Washington Square.

Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693-727.

Garcia-Zamor, J. C. (2003). Workplace spirituality and organizational performance.

Public Administration Review, 63(3), 355-363.

Gardner, D. G., & Pierce, J. L. (1998). Self-esteem and self-efficacy within the organizational context an empirical examination. Group & Organization

Management, 23(1), 48-70.

Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2003). Handbook of workplace spirituality and

organizational performance. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data

analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hawley, J. (1993). Reawakening the spirit in work: The power of charming

management. San Francisco, CA: Berretta-Koehler.

Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases.

Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 286-316.

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and

applications. Chicago, IL: SPSS.

Jurkiewicz, C. L., & Giacalone, R. A. (2004). A values framework for measuring the impact of workplace spirituality on organizational performance. Journal of

Business Ethics, 49(2), 129-142.

Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.

Kinjerski, V. (2013). The spirit at work scale: Developing and validating a measure of individual spirituality at work. In J. Neal (Ed.), Handbook of faith and spirituality

in the workplace (pp. 383-402). New York, NY: Springer.

吳和堂　教師職場靈性量表之發展

₃₃

Kinjerski, V., & Skrypnek, B. J. (2006). Creating organizational conditions that foster

employee spirit at work. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(4), 280-295.

Krishnakumar, S., & Neck, C. P. (2002). The “what”, “why” and “how” of spirituality in the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(3), 153-164.

McAllister, D. J., & Bigley, G. A. (2002). Work context and the definition of self: How organizational care influences organization-basei self-esteem. Academy of

Management Journal, 45(5), 894-904.

McLver, J., & Carmines, E. G. (1981). Unidimensional scaling (Vol. 24). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

McLaughlin, C. (1998). Spirituality at work. The Bridging Tree, 1, 11.

McMillan, D. W. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology,

24(4), 315-325.

Miller, B. (1992). Collective action and rational choice: Place, community, and the limits to individual self-interest. Economic Geography, 68(1), 22-42.

Milliman, J., Czaplewski, A. J., & Ferguson, J. (2003). Workplace spirituality and employee work attitudes: A exploratory empirical assessment. Journal of

Organizational Change Management, 16(4), 426-447.

Milliman, J., Ferguson, J., Trickett, D., & Condemi, B. (1999). Spirit and community at Southwest Airlines: An investigation of a spiritual values-based model. Journal of

Organizational Change Management, 12(3), 221-233.

Mirvis, P. H. (1997). Soul work in organizations. Organization Science, 8(2), 193-206. Moore, T. W., & Casper, W. J. (2006). An examination of proxy measures of workplace

spirituality: A profile model of multidimensional constructs. Journal of Leadership

& Organizational Studies, 12(4), 109-118.

Pawar, B. S. (2009). Individual spirituality, workplace spirituality and work attitudes: An empirical test of direct and interaction effects. Leadership & Organization

Development Journal, 30(8), 759-777.

34

健康促進

與

衛生教育

學報　第 46 期

Perrone, K. M., Webb, L. K., Wright, S. L., Jackson, Z. V., & Ksiazak, T. M. (2006). Relationship of spirituality to work and family roles and life satisfaction among gifted adults. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 28(3), 253-268.

Petchsawang, P., & Duchon, D. (2009). Measuring workplace spirituality in an Asian context. Human Resource Development International, 12(4), 459-468.

Pielstick, C. D. (2005). Teaching spiritual synchronicity in a business leadership class.

Journal of Management Education, 29(1), 158-159.

Piryaei, S., & Zare, R. (2013). Workplace spirituality and positive work attitudes: The moderating role of individual spirituality. Indian Journal of Economics and

Development, 1(4), 91-97.

Rego, A., & e Cunha, M. P. (2008). Workplace spirituality and organizational commitment: An empirical study. Journal of Organizational Change Management,

21(1), 53-75.

Sheep, M. L. (2004). Nailing down gossamer: A valid measure of the

person-organization fit of workplace spirituality. Retrieved from http://ejournal.narotama.

ac.id/files/Person-organization%20fir%20&%20sprituality.pdf

Shellenbarger, S. (2000, December 27). More relaxed boomers, fewer workplace frills and other job trends. Wall Street Journal, p. B-i.

Tabachnica, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Vancouver, J. B., & Schmitt, N. W. (1991). An exploratory examination of person‐organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel Psychology,

44(2), 333-352.

Weiss, D. J., Davis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the

Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota.

Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of

Management Review, 7(3), 418-428.

Yee, R.-W., Lee, P.-K., Yeung, A.-C., & Cheng, T. C.-E. (2013). The relationships

吳和堂　教師職場靈性量表之發展

₃₅

among leadership, goal orientation, and service quality in high-contact service industries: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics,

141(2), 452-464.

36

健康促進

與

衛生教育

學報　第 46 期

The Development and Construct Validity of

Teachers’ Scale of Workplace Spirituality

Ho-Tang Wu

Abstract

The aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive examination of reliability and validity of Teachers’ Scale of Workplace Spirituality (TSWS) in Taiwan school setting. The processes of scale development were on the following steps: First, according to the literature, a 17-intial-item theoretical model was used to develop the TSWS. Second, the 17 intial items revised by 4 experts, and 6 items wrer revised, the other 11 items remained. Third, the revised 17 items were analyzed by try-out, including item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and reliability analysis. In first try-out, 1 item was deleted, for it posited on the wrong factor. But in the second one, the remained 16 items divided into 3 factors, named sense of meaning work, sense of community and sense of organizational identification, with acceptable validity and reliability. Fouth, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to verify the initial model of 3-factor-and-16-item. The overall pattern of results indicated that the TSWS was reasonably reliable and valid in Taiwan school settings. Finally, in order to find the level and group difference on teacher’s workplace spirituality, author compiled the formal questionnaire based on CFA outcome, and resurveyed 610 samples. The finding showed that teacher’s workplace spirituality is on above average level. Furthemore, the served education stage (divied into three subgroup, served at primay schoo, juinior and senior high

Professor, Department of Education, National Kaohsiung Normal University, E-mail: t1665@nknucc.nknu.edu.tw

吳和堂　教師職場靈性量表之發展

₃₇

school) and marital status (married and unmarry) reach significant difference. To sum up, the TSWS is validity and reliable, it colud be a research tool for further study.

Key words: sense of meaning work, sense of community, sense of organizational identification, workplace spirituality