Human Rights Council Report Card:
Government Positions on Key Issues 2006-2007
Source of Information for UPR: Role of civil society and experts in the review process:
Adoption of the UPR outcome:
5 Supported role of civil society and independent experts in providing information for the report serving as the basis of the review
5 Supported a review process led by independent experts
5 Opposed adoption of UPR outcome by consensus
7 Supported a review process controlled by States and opposed role of experts and civil society
7 Supported adoption of UPR outcome by consensus
: Supported a State-led review process with participation of civil society and experts
Algeria 7 7 7
Argentina 5 5
Azerbaijan
Bahrain 7 7 7
Bangladesh 7 7 7
Brazil 5 :
Cameroon 7 7 7
Canada 5 7 5
China 7 7 7
Cuba 7 7
Czech Republic 5 5 5
Djibouti 7 7 7
Ecuador 5 :
Finland 5 5 5
France 5 5 5
Gabon 7 7 7
Germany 5 5 5
Ghana 7 7 7
Guatemala 7 :
India 7 7 7
Indonesia 7 7 7
Japan Member Countries
Establishing a credible Universal Periodic Review mechanism
7 Supported information provided
by the State as the primary basis for
the report and opposed submissions
by civil society directly to the council.
Human Rights Council Report Card:
Government Positions on Key Issues 2006-2007
Source of Information for UPR: Role of civil society and experts in the review process:
Adoption of the UPR outcome:
5 Supported role of civil society and independent experts in providing information for the report serving as the basis of the review
5 Supported a review process led by independent experts
5 Opposed adoption of UPR outcome by consensus
7 Supported a review process controlled by States and opposed role of experts and civil society
7 Supported adoption of UPR outcome by consensus
: Supported a State-led review process with participation of civil society and experts
Member Countries
Establishing a credible Universal Periodic Review mechanism
7 Supported information provided by the State as the primary basis for the report and opposed submissions by civil society directly to the council.
Jordan 7 7 7
Malaysia 7 7 7
Mali 7 7 7
Mauritius 7 7
Mexico 5 :
Morocco 7 7 7
Netherlands 5 5 5
Nigeria 7 7 7
Pakistan 7 7 7
Peru 5 :
Philippines 7
Poland 5 5 5
Republic of Korea 5 7 5
Romania 5 5 5
Russia 7 7 7
Saudi Arabia 7 7 7
Senegal 7 7 7
South Africa 7
Sri Lanka 7 7 7
Switzerland : 5
Tunisia 7 7 7
Ukraine
Human Rights Council Report Card:
Government Positions on Key Issues 2006-2007
Source of Information for UPR: Role of civil society and experts in the review process:
Adoption of the UPR outcome:
5 Supported role of civil society and independent experts in providing information for the report serving as the basis of the review
5 Supported a review process led by independent experts
5 Opposed adoption of UPR outcome by consensus
7 Supported a review process controlled by States and opposed role of experts and civil society
7 Supported adoption of UPR outcome by consensus
: Supported a State-led review process with participation of civil society and experts
Member Countries
Establishing a credible Universal Periodic Review mechanism
7 Supported information provided by the State as the primary basis for the report and opposed submissions by civil society directly to the council.
United Kingdom 5 5 5
Uruguay 5 5 5
Zambia 7 7 7
Chile 5 5
Colombia 7 7
Costa Rica 5 5
Iran 7
Liechtenstein 7
New Zealand 5
Norway 5 7
Panama 5 5
Paraguay 5 5
USA 5 7
1
