• 沒有找到結果。

九年一貫課程設計理念與國中教師教育信念研究

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "九年一貫課程設計理念與國中教師教育信念研究"

Copied!
3
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

九年一貫課程設計理念與國中教師教育信念研究—以中彰 投四縣市國中教師為例

曾素秋

中文摘要

教師之教育信念是影響教育革新之關鍵。本文主要在於探討九年一貫課程設 計理念與國中教師教育信念,由研究者以九年一貫課程設計理念為依據,自編「國 民中學九年一貫課程教師教育信念問卷」,採用調查法了解在九年一貫課程設計 實施後教師之教育信念,以描述統計分析各量表選項填答分數之平均數、標準 差、及各選項選答人數、及百分比,用以探討九年一貫課程實施之成效並提出教 育建言。

研究結果發現:

1.教師較無法認同九年一貫課程能培養學生之十大基本能力,但對九年一貫 課程諸如課程計畫之執行、創新教學之理念建構學校本位課程等教學設計 理念則傾向支持認同。

2.教師對九年一貫課程,教師需參與課程組織、教師為教學設計者、教師需 具備能力指標轉換之能力、教師是學生經驗之分享者、學生是學習的主 體、教學需適應個別差異、教師要於教學時融入重要議題、使用多元評量、

評量與教學之結合等,「教師角色與評量」層面持傾向「正向、支持、肯 定」之態度。

3.教師在九年一貫課程「學習領域」面向,表示持「負面、反對」傾向,尤

(2)

其對「學習領域的分野」、「合科教學取代分科教學」表示不贊同。而在「學 校本位課程」推動表示持「正向、肯定」傾向。

4.教師對九年一貫課程「課程推動」層面傾向「正向、支持、肯定」之態度,

包括教師對九年一貫課程學校課程委員會之任務以及教師自行編輯教材 與減少對教科書依賴之理念予以肯定、認同。

5.國中教師對目前九年一貫課程關於「課程革新」層面,傾向「負向、反對、

否定」之態度,主要呈現反對意見的在於,教師不認為「九年一貫課程可 降低各年級的上課時數以減輕學生的負擔」以及「實施一綱多本」之爭議。

6.教師對目前九年一貫課程之「課程特色」,包括:以課程綱要取代課程標 準、以基本能力培養課程設計核心之看法則傾向「正向、支持、肯定」之 態度。

7.九年一貫課程實施成效難以評估,教師教育信念無法完全支持九年一貫課 程之設計理念,仍有許多問題亟待改善:包括九年一貫課程教育目標之釐 清、協同教學模式推動不易、習學領域劃分之合理性、一綱一本與一綱多 本之爭議、升學考試與總結性評量結合之再思量、教育改革推行的步驟等。

關鍵字:九年一貫課程、教育信念、課程改革

(3)

The research of Grade 1-9 Curriculum conception and junior high school teachers’ educational beliefs

Abstract

The aim of the study is to compare Grade 1-9 curriculum rationale with junior high school teachers’ education belief. Depending on Grade 1-9 curriculum rationale, the researcher designed the questionnaire to investigate the teachers’ education belief.

The study result includes:

1. The junior high school teachers couldn’t identify Grade 1-9

Curriculum goals. They think Grade 1-9 curriculum couldn’t foster students’

Core Competence.

2. The junior high school teachers identify the Grade 1-9 curriculum rational of the teachers’ role and instructional assessment.

3. The junior high school teachers didn’t agree the compartment of learning areas and team teaching in Grade 1-9 curriculum, but they agree

school-based curriculum.

4. The junior high school teachers support to found Committee of School Curriculum Development to move Grade 1-9 curriculum.

5. The junior high school teachers didn’t agree Grade 1-9 curriculum could reduce the pressure of junior high school students.

6. The junior high school teachers identify the characteristic of Grade 1-9 curriculum.

7. The effect of Grade 1-9 Curriculum is difficult to judge. The junior high school teachers can’t support all of the Grade 1-9 Curriculum conception.

Key word: Grade 1-9 Curriculum、educational belief、Curriculum Reform

參考文獻

相關文件

If the application for reimbursement of rent for the school premises is approved, I agree to include in the school accounts all income generated through the use of my school

help students develop the reading skills and strategies necessary for understanding and analysing language use in English texts (e.g. text structures and

• e‐Learning Series: Effective Use of Multimodal Materials in Language Arts to Enhance the Learning and Teaching of English at the Junior Secondary Level. Language across

← This allows teachers to adapt the school-based English Language curriculum and devise learning/teaching materials that better suit the diverse abilities, needs

The researcher of this study maintained that the junior high school curriculum emphasized too much on plane geometry and should incorporate existing high school curriculum

Most of teachers agree with positive effects of the 99 curriculum on practical instruction in school, however, they seem to concern inequalities of content between volumes and

13 Certificate in Professional Development Programme for Secondary School Teachers (Mathematics Teaching) [5 weeks].

分項計畫「海上絲路之探索」之設計與推行,基本上針對本校通